INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Similar Questions

• Can access the shared folder by using the name of the server, but is unable to use the intellectual property

  

  Hi, I need help with a very strange problem.

  I have a Server 2003 domain controller to PC and all the domain user can access any shared folder of the server using IP address or FULL domain name.

  So I joined a R2 of 2012 new server to the domain as a workstation normal and not as a new domain on the network controller, and the problem is that one cannot access a shared folder on the new server by using the IP, but can be accessed using the name of the computer.

  My Admin user can access the folder using the IP address or the name comp. on any work, but the user of my AD position may not use intellectual property.

  I can using Ping IP or name of the computer for every user of AD.

  Please check the attached images.

  When I try to access it using IP, it gives me the following error:

  \\192.168.0.2 is not accessible. You might not have permission to use this network resourse. Contact the administrator of this server to fing out if you have access permissions.

  Currently, there are no available connection server to process the logon request.

  Hello

  You may need to ask the question on the TechNet Forums:

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/WindowsServer/en-us/home

  Kind regards

• 100.0 Mbps, but not the acquisition of intellectual property

  100.0 Mbps, but not the acquisition of intellectual property

  Hello manicuredlawns,

  This sounds like the behavior of the specific virus. You have already run a full system scan with your anti-virus security software?
  You may need to do this in Mode without failure to a complete analysis of the system:
  http://www.Microsoft.com/resources/documentation/Windows/XP/all/proddocs/en-us/boot_failsafe.mspx?mfr=true
  I suggest to choose Safe Mode with network on see if the network connection works differently.
  Also try a restore of the system in safe mode to see if it makes no progress:
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/304449

• Error message: this isn't a problem with intellectual property. Board of Directors, but rather with your SQL Server when you visit a Web site.

  Original title: an error occurred in SQL server?

  Hello, I just wanted to go to this site, but this error pops up: error SQL

  An error occurred in SQL server:

  This isn't a problem with intellectual property. Board of Directors, but rather with your SQL Server. Please contact your host and copy the above message.

  «Back to index »

  Please help me, I just moved my computer so I had to disconnect from the internet, but now he has problems.

  Is the site I tried to go to: http://www.minecraftforum.net/topic/227822-166-millenaire-npc-village-076c-duplicate-villager-fix/

  Hey Brainiac,

  1. are you encounter problems with this site?

  2. are you able to connect to this site from a different computer?

  3. were you able to connect to this website before?

  4. you remember to make changes to the computer before this problem?

  The problem seems to be, with the site that you are visiting. You can check if you can access the site from another computer.

  Hope this information is useful.

• warning by email: we discovered the series of illegal attempts on your e-mail account of different areas of the intellectual property. It's for your own safety to continue to use your account, click on the button below.

  Original title:

  warning by email

  Got this e-mail with the subject attention!

  Is - is this legitimate?

  He wants me to press any key to continue

  Thank you

  Microsoft account

  Microsoft Security info

  We discovered the series of illegal attempts on your e-mail account of different areas of the intellectual property. It's for your own safety to continue to use your account, click on the button below.

  Continue

  Note: Please do not ignore this email to avoid your closed account

  Thank you

  The team Microsoft account

  Hello

  Phishing scam.
  Ignore!

  FYI

  Microsoft usually has a green shield on the name of the sender.

  

  This indicates that the e-mail coming from Microsoft / play the sender.

  If, in case of doubt, please check your email to see if the Green Shield is there. ***

  Phishing: Frequently asked questions
  How can I Report Spam, Phishing or abusive messages in Outlook.com?

  My account has been hacked

  How to recognize phishing e-mails, phone calls or links

• Protection of the rights of intellectual property in file Bar

  Hello

  I generate file *.bar for my application of stunts, but I decovert that the file (* .bar) can open by WinRAR and all my *.qml files can be read!

  So, where is the protection of intellectual property rights?

  You cannot access bar files on the device, and that the apps are distributed only by using bb world usually there is no other way to access as well.

• Parody of intellectual property

  Hello

  I have the critical alert.

  Deny (192.168.97.16) IP spoofing to virtual_plc on the interface outside

  That I understand because the two addresses are on the same subnet, but on different interfaces.

  However, I want to communicate, how do I do it please?

  I have attached a drawing of the network.

  Us VPN in the site of our clients, where the VPN server gives us the address 192.168.97.x.

  Of the Subscriber's network is 151.133.100.x where our router is at 151.133.100.80.

  We static NAT 151.133.100.81 and 151.133.100.81 by 192.168.100.180 and 192.168.100.184 respectively.

  Our router is an ASA5505

  Thanks in advance.

  John

  Ah ha, you have no default route defined.

  Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x

  x.x.x.x = within the intellectual property of ASA else are you vpn'ing in.

• What is no-WINS node? Does this mean he does not broadcast server service and the WINS service to resolve a name to intellectual property?

  What is no-WINS node? Does this mean he does not broadcast server service and the WINS service to resolve a name to intellectual property?

  Hi Adam,.

  essentially servers (nodes) Wins, run a program that turns the words we type in on Internet:

  (ESPN.com) in the actual physical address of ESPN.com servers.

  So no Wins use only the real 119.97.555.34 (not a real address) instead of ESPN.com words

  B Eddie

• Image rejected because refusal of intellectual property

  Hello

  So, I submitted this image and dismissed due to the refusal of intellectual property

  Painted Ladies by astroprojector - Photo 93593623 / 500px

  However, in similar image search, I found there are a lot of images more like my who were accepted. Click on this link.

  Pictures free rights, photos, and graphics. Adobe Stock

  There is no explanation about what intellectual property is the problem and why the other images have been accepted? These images are correct release property, or images just arbitrarily approved or rejected?

  Thanks for your patience so I checked on that. The picture you posted of painted ladies it turned was acceptable to use and has been put online by the moderation team.

  The two examples you have posted most recently are impressive pictures. We cannot sell them for commercial use, with the prominent Union Bank logo on the building however. I recommend out clone as well as all the other logos you can see in the image and submit it again for a second review.

  Kind regards

  Mat Hayward

• Violation of intellectual property

  Hello. These 2 images have been refused because the 'Violation of intellectual property", but I don't see anything unusual and of course are my photos.

  

  @Marlon buildings in the top picture are clearly identifiable and as private property, you would need to obtain a release of property signed by the owners before you can sell the property for commercial use images. In the same image, the name of the boat is also visible and identifiable to that effect a release of the property would be required for that as well.

  The boat to the bottom image is identifiable by the name on the side. Try cloning try and try again. You can find a better result.

  Good luck!

  Mat Hayward

• Galleries of photos, logos and intellectual property

  I saw some images on Adobe Stock that resemble some logo designs I've seen on the spot. I decided to write a blog post about the dangers of the cheap logo design.

  I'm certain it violates the intellectual property rights of a person to use a photo for their brand even if they paid for it.

  Any info on this topic will be very welcome

  Hello

  Please see the FAQ for more information - FAQs, Adobe Stock

  Can I use an image Adobe Stock in my company or brand logo?

  N ° you must have complete ownership of the image that you use for your company logo, because logos are meant to be saved and protected to prevent other companies or organizations to use the same image. Because Adobe Stock only grants a right to use the images and does not transfer the property, these images cannot be used in or as a logo.

  Thank you

  Bev

• Security problems.  Adobe connects vires of intellectual property. and if so recognize who visited my recordings.  Thank you

  Security problems.  Adobe connects vires of intellectual property. and if so recognize who visited my recordings.  Thank you

  Connect does not collect IP addresses. Records can follow who saw them if viewers are journaled in Connect.

• Statement of apex management 4.2: intellectual property protection

  4.2 review and don't see not where the below stated guidance is addressed. While I found the ability to package an application with install sql scripts and others. I can't find where there was the possibility of protecting intellectual property rights. I missed something or has simply not addressed or included? IE: there should be the possibility to export and install an application read/only run with or without the ability to circumvent or modify administrator.
  
  http://www.Oracle.com/technetwork/developer-tools/Apex/application-express/Apex-sod-087560.html
  
  Oracle Application Express
  Management representation statement
  Last updated: April 18, 2012
  ..
  Application deployment - provide more opportunities for the packaging and distribution of APEX applications to improve the protection of intellectual property rights and to facilitate customization.
  ..

  Hi Johnny,.

  Due to time constraints, we do not unfortunately have to address the function of Application deployment, as indicated in the declaration of the Direction you provided a link to APEX 4.2. However, it is our intention to address this feature in a future version of Application Express.

  Kind regards
  Hilary

• Add hosts to the new regime of intellectual property

  We have recently moved offices and changed our intellectual property system, and now I can not add the host to Vcenter.  I can get to all the consoles of service, but when I go to the VI client and watch all host all VMs appear as disconnected.  The same goes for the host is Tjhe.  I tried to remove one at a time and to add them but get an error message...

  Add a host

  LUTZCPA

  A host with powered or suspended virtual

  machines cannot enter an enhanced VMotion

  Compatibility cluster that is configured for a

  Lower function CPU reference host.

  LUTZCPA\super6

  vCenter. LUTZCPA.COM

  05/06/2010 09:07:49

  05/06/2010 09:07:49

  05/06/2010 09:07:50

  What should I remove every army until I have re - add the? any help is appreciated.  Thank you

  Looks like you have set too low level CVS

  ---

  VCP MCSA, MCTS Hyper-V, VMware vExpert 2009, 3/4

  http://blog.vadmin.ru

• Flash of intellectual property Protection

  Hello

  I wanted to know how my intellectual property, such as the graphic designs, pictures, drawings of interpolations , etc. can be protected in one. flash swf file?

  This is because it is a. decompliers , which can very easily convert my files in swf file. fla and so can access my drawings to jpeg , photos, etc.

  Is there a best practice that can be followed through which one can take form any measures of security within flash code, etc.? And if so someone knows what are these measures?

  Also is there a way to monitor and look for my online Design materials such as through google?

  Thank you

  Dan

  The only way lightning protects your original graphics is that after he did compression extractable material will be reduced in quality, otherwise: there is no protection.

• Validation of intellectual property question

  Hello
  
  Referring to the Sub statement of the OAS best practices guide
  
  Oracle® Application Server Best Practices Guide
  10g (10.1.4.0.1)
  B31762-02 part number
  
  http://download-West.Oracle.com/docs/CD/B28196_01/core.1014/b31762/accessmgr.htm#CJGDJCIG
  
  
  Chapter: 2.2.1 using the Validation of IP, HTTPS and secure Cookies in order to mitigate the risk of an attack of Cookie response
  
  "Oracle recommends that you always enable validation by IP limit the risk of a response cookie.
  attack. If exceptions are necessary, for example, when you deploy by using a reverse proxy topology,
  to ensure that only allowed IP addresses are included in the list of exceptions. Avoid
  always turn off IP validation. »
  
  We turned off IP validation on all of our Web servers for 2 reason below:
  
  1. we do authentication on a different server (URL redirection in the authentication scheme)
  2. We also do authentication on the IIS server and weblogic server.
  
  Question:
  (1) to activate this IP Validation on 'ON', add the IP address of all the location where the cookie is created or updated?
  
  (2) if that's the case, then that includes all the Web server host, the IIS server that create the obssocookie?
  
  Appreciate the comments.

  It is difficult to answer without knowing your topology.

  If you think about it this way, it should help you answer your own question:

  The IP validation is the process of comparing the IP address of the client with the value of the intellectual property in the ObSSOCookie. The value of the cookie is the IP address of the HTTP client when authenticating.

  Validation of off means IP - regardless of the IP address from where a connection to an HTTP server protected WebGate originates, no comparison of the value of intellectual property to the IP in the ObSSOCookie will happen.

  The IP validation on means - the client IP will always be compared to the value of the cookie. If they are not the same, it is assumed that the cookie is reproduced by an invalid client and session (cookie) is not valid.

  IP Validation on way to exceptions: Do IP Validation EXCEPT when the IP address of the client matches a value in the list of exceptions.

  Mark