iPad 4 blocked mode recovery, itunes waiting for ipad

Similar Questions

• A question about synchronized waiting (block mode) for CPI in BB

  Hello

  I have such a scenario.

  Process a need to send a message to process B, in the send method, we need to wait until it receives the

  notification of process B that B has processed the message.

  All I know is that using ApplicationManager PostGlobalEvent() can send a message to B. But it is non-blocking mode.

  For example, after PostGlobalEent(), A must wait an appropriate event. There may be an another globalevent in A listener to listen on

  the notification.

  Thus in A, we will wait indefinitely until the listener has defined a status which a no need to wait any longer.

  I think that Infinity waiting consumes too much battery of BB.

  Is there a better method to avoid this problem constantly wait?

  In Windows Mobile, waitForSingleObject can easily deal with such a scenario. (blocking for the notification mode)

  I don't know if there is a similar way in BB.

  Any help?

  Sorry, I misread your original message and began to talk about the broader and more complicated case.

  You seem to want to send a message and it will hang until it is processed. You can do this as follows. You basically need a flag that can be set and queried in a thread-safe way, and it should also be possible to block until the indicator is defined without having an impact on the battery. The solution is simple. You need a flag (for example, a Boolean variable) and a monitor object. For example, you can put a Boolean field in the class of your message and use the message as a monitor instance. The beneficiary will be the message, treat it, acquire the monitor, set the flag and call notifyAll() on the monitor. The sender can thus post, acquire the monitor and loop until the flag is set, while citing wait() on the screen after each failure audit. This will have the effect of blocking the sender if the message has not yet been processed and that, until the message is processed. Waiting for a monitor is very cheap in what concerns the use of the battery, so don't worry about this.

  You can extend the simultaneous construction above to have a flag + result/exception and you get something similar to java.util.concurrent.Future of J2SE, I was talking about in my previous posts.

  P.S. If the processing of the message does not have a lot of time, I suggest that you consider the much simpler solution of using Application.invokeAndWait.

• recovery iPhone 6s + not recognized mode on iTunes

  I had recently an iPhone 6s over someone and when I tried to put it into recovery mode to put in shape, I got an error (23, 14, I think.) Subsequently, the phone has been blocked in Recovery mode and cannot be updated. Now, it is not yet recognized by iTunes on my PC. Has anyone else got a happen to them? How can I solve this problem?

  What version of iTunes are you running? What version of Windows?

  You can solve specific errors here: get help with iOS update and restore errors - Apple Support

• CREATE INDEXES online is waiting for the TX = 4 mode

  Hello

  I have a strange blocking problem where an INDEX CREATE LINE is waiting for a transaction that did only inserted a line in the parent table.

  Wait is mode TX = 4 (not TM locks) and I currently have it reproduced only on 11.2.0.3 and 11.2.0.4

  Easy to replicate the schema SCOTT:

  Session 1:

  SQL > set time on

  14:54:58 SQL > insert into SCOTT. Dept (DEPTNO, dname) values (50, 'test');

  1 line of creation.

  Session 2;

  14:55:24 SQL > create index test on SCOTT. EMP (ename) online;

  It's waiting ' enq: TX - line lock conflict ":"

  SQL > select sid, chain_signature from v$ wait_chains where blocker_is_valid = 'TRUE '.

  SID CHAIN_SIGNATURE

  ---------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------

  603 ' SQL * Net client message' < ='enq: TX - line lock conflict '

  While waiting to acquire the lock of transaction in mode 4:

  SQL > select * lock gv$ where sid = 603

  INST_ID SELECT ADDR KADDR SID TYPE ID1 ID2 LMODE CTIME BLOCK REQUEST

  ---------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------- ---- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

  1 00000006CDA05EB8 00000006CDA05F10 603 352577 0 4 0 348 2 AE

  1 00000006CDA06078 00000006CDA060D0 603 DL 779505 0 3 0 308 2

  1 00000006CD9FABE0 00000006CD9FAC38 603 DL 779505 0 3 0 308 2

  1 00007F28001F5028 00007F28001F5088 603 779505 0 2 0 308 2 TM

  1 00007F28001F5028 00007F28001F5088 603 779510 0 4 0 308 2 TM

  1 00000006CD9FA240 00000006CD9FA298 603 779505 0 4 0 308 2 OD

  1 00000006B4F26790 00000006B4F26808 589847 711499 6 0 308 2 TX 603

  1 00000006CDA0ED68 00000006CDA0EDC0 655377 996169 0 4 308 TX 603 0

  I've traced 10046 and 10704:

  broadcast message = obj 29231196672 #= 779514 tim = 1447251053634045

  ksqgtl * mode TX-000f001e-000ad97c = 4 flags = 0 x 10001 timeout = 21474836 *.

  ksqgtl: xcb = 0x6bb322528, ktcdix = 2147483647, topxcb = 0x6bb322528

  ktcipt (topxcb) = 0 x 0

  ksucti: init logon has of txn DID:

  ksqgtl:

  ksqlkdid: 0001-003F-0000AFC4

  ksudidTrace: ksqgtl

  ktcmydid(): 0001-003F-0000AFC4

  ksusesdi: 0001-003F-0000AFC3

  ksusetxn: 0001-003F-0000AFC4

  ksqcmi: TX, f001e, ad97c mode = 4 timeout = 21474836

  2015-11-11 15:11:36.566

  WAITING #140700792578680: nam ='enq: TX - line lock conflict ' ela 42932082 name = | mode = 1415053316 usn < < 16 | location = sequence 983070 = obj 711036 #= 779514 tim = 1447251096566283

  And there is nothing in V$ SESSION leader/block/line current. class obj # is EMP. current sql_id is the CREATE INDEX.

  If anyone has an idea on:

  -Why creating an index in line must wait for transactions that modified only parent table

  -How to continue the investigation

  -can or cannot reproduce in other versions

  Thanks in advance,

  Franck.

  I guess you have a constraint foreign key between emp and Dept.

  It's expected behaviours: since 11.1 any DML at one end of a referential integrity constraint translates into a mode lock 3 taken at the other end, and your phenomenon resembles a side effect of this.

  When you try to create the index online that your session must assume that the other session (holding mode 3 on the emp and dept) may have changed the emp and dept, so it must wait for the session to the commit or rollback.

  (I guess that in principle, he could walk the cancellation of the transaction see if EMP had in fact been changed - but maybe who was considered too complicated to be worth the risk to implement)

  Concerning

  Jonathan Lewis

  Updated - I just did a quick check to reproduce the effect on 11.1.0.7

  For reference - here are a few notes on modes of locking and how the application has changed over time: https://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2010/06/21/locks/

• Media, recovery waiting for thread 1 sequence (in transit)

  I have rebuilt our standby database using rman double since it lacked many newspapers of archiving.
  
  After the double, the eve is now almost in sync with the primary. The Marbles that ship through, but are not implemented in a timely. How long should wait to a journal of the Archives of the primary to be applied to the waiting?
  
  I need to know this so that a good script can be configured to check the primary and standby. For the moment, that they are never exactly synchronized - sequence always one behind the primary number.
  
  Why is Eve does not have in a timely fashion?
  
  From the journal of alerts:
  
  Media, recovery waiting for thread 1 sequence 11278 (in transit)
  
  The journal seems to be "in transit" for a long time
  
  PRIMARY:
  SQL > select max (sequence #) the journal of v current_seq $;
  
  CURRENT_SEQ
  -----------
  11278
  
  
  SB:
  SQL > select MAX (SEQUENCE #), APPLIED from V$ ARCHIVED_LOG in case of APPLICATION = 'YES' GROUP APPLIED;
  
  MAX(SEQUENCE#) APP
  -------------- ---
  YES 11277
  
  
  JOURNAL ALERTS:
  RFS [2]: Archived Log: ' / backup/prod/log_1_11277_704816194.dbf'
  Primary database is in MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE mode
  Mon Nov 1 15:22:01 2010
  Recovery Media Log /backup/prod/log_1_11272_704816194.dbf
  Mon 1 Nov 15:26:49 2010
  Recovery Media Log /backup/prod/log_1_11273_704816194.dbf
  Mon Nov 1 15:29:54 2010
  Recovery Media Log /backup/prod/log_1_11274_704816194.dbf
  Mon Nov 1 15:34:18 2010
  Recovery Media Log /backup/prod/log_1_11275_704816194.dbf
  Mon Nov 1 15:36:42 2010
  Recovery Media Log /backup/prod/log_1_11276_704816194.dbf
  Mon Nov 1 15:39:43 2010
  Recovery Media Log /backup/prod/log_1_11277_704816194.dbf
  Mon Nov 1 15:42:34 2010
  Media, recovery waiting for thread 1 sequence 11278 (in transit)
  
  I should add that I understand that for the primary and standby to be interrupted by a newspaper is not a concern (they ask). It's just that I wanted a check that compare the two script and at the time where they are never equal - when I understand them to be, and that newspapers should apply almost immediately.
  
  Published by: Dan on November 1, 2010 16:36

  How long should wait to a journal of the Archives of the primary to be applied to the waiting?

  also depends on the speed of the network.
  Make sure that the archives are shipped instead of sleep.

  PRIMARY:
  SQL > select max (sequence #) the journal of v current_seq $;
  CURRENT_SEQ

  11278 (it's not connect archivelog)... :)

  SB:
  SQL > select MAX (SEQUENCE #), APPLIED from V$ ARCHIVED_LOG in case of APPLICATION = 'YES' GROUP APPLIED;
  MAX(SEQUENCE#) APP

  YES 11277

  Hi check MRP starts or not?
  database principal that you must not check the current sequence, generated check last sequence... not common sequence.

  current sequence is redo log, which has not yet been archived

  I think that everything is perfect here... no problems.

  Hope you understand, I would like to know if it is not explicit, thank you.

• While trying to see Planner installation and operation, the test in local mode, the EXECUTION fails with message "Waiting for the number of virtual machines to register.

  While trying to see installation and operation Planner, the test in local mode with only 1 VM the EXECUTION fails with message "Waiting for the number of virtual machines to register.

  There may be a lot of problems in the desktop VM. Agent service see Planner is not running in VM Office. You can check in the event viewer to see what kind of error occurs. The most usual error missing file IP.txt c; drive or harness IP in the IP.txt produce if there is.

• App CC stay in mode "wait for install" for hours after download

  ATER, install the CC apps they simply stay in the mode "wait for install" for hours--doing nothing--indeed very annoying.

  Everyone has the same problems?

  Screenshot shows the problem with bridge CC - same thing for any other application

  Platform: Mac OS X 10.6.8

  Geman version

  Logged in as Admin

  No other Adobe apps running in background

  

  Maybe it helps to find a vats for the problem:
  Logout in the application Manager button is "grayed out" mode "wait...". »

  Manager application must be turned off via the main menu

  

• BPEL blocked waiting for a response in a human task onMessage

  I want to run an invoke after each reception. I used the onTaskUpdated.

  My script has 4 approvers series. After the first 3, everything works fine and the invoke is executed correctly.

  After the last of them, the flow is stuck on the onMessage 'pending' node: "waiting for"onTaskUpdated"to"NewPolicyApprovalHT.TaskService". Asynchronous callback. »

  I tried to activate the onStageComplete, but then the flow is waiting for answer for both nodes onMessage.

  SOA version 11.1.1.7.0.

  Clues?

  Thank you!

  OK solved.

  Sort of (sic) the first node that is assigned to the global variable was absent.

  Thank you.

• "waiting for encrypted google" does not allow me to open a Web site

  When I try to open lifenews.com, which I visited many times, there is a message saying left down "waiting for encrypted google." I don't even use google chrome? I don't know where to go to get rid of it, I don't want nothing blocked unless I specifically ask to be blocked. I did the research, said it's a blur, said another security settings to uncheck the ssl2 and ssl3. Nothing works. Can someone tell me please how to remove this thing waiting for encrypted google.

  You said blur, which is an add-on. Use the blur, or any extension of similar content filtering? If you think one of them might be the problem, you can test Firefox Safe mode. It is a standard diagnostic tool to disable extensions, hardware acceleration, and a few other advanced features of Firefox.

  Does not work if Firefox: Hold down the SHIFT key when you start Firefox.

  If Firefox is running: You can restart Firefox in Mode safe mode using either:

  • button "3-bar" menu > "?" button > restart with disabled modules
  • Help menu > restart with disabled modules

  and OK reboot.

  Two scenarios: A small dialog box should appear. Click on 'Start mode safe' (not update).

  Any improvement?

• "Waiting for socket available...". »

  After the AC1200 of LINKSYS router I can not load some sites in my Chrome.
  Chrome status bar continues to display: "Waiting for socket available...". "One of the Web sites not available for me is more Google search resutls.

  It works well with the previous router.

  It works well when I bypass my LINKSYS AC1200 and connect directly to my cable modem.

  It works fine from Firefox. It works even with the chrome in incognito mode.

  Only the combination of LINKSYS AC1200 with my Chrome me goves this access problem.

  No idea where to find do more "available for my Chrome sockets" ;-), please

  Clear the cache of chrome.

  Try IE 8, 9, 10 or 11, set the compatibility mode and test again.
  Disable any security browser addons such as No Script and Ad-Block or set them to allow all Pages when it is connected to the router.
  Clear all caches browser.
  Don't forget to log on to the Admin account on the router.
  Try disabling these features in Chrome:
  Top right corner, few bars options > settings > settings (left) > see the advanced settings.
  Uncheck the box for these:
  Use a web service to help solve the navigational errors
  Use a service forecast for complete searches and URLS typed in the address bar
  Predict the actions of the network to improve the performance of page loading
  Activate the protection from phishing and malware

  Which modem to ISP Mfr and model # you have?

• Waiting for redo log file missing when restore main database using RMAN backup that was taken on the database physical standby

  Here's my question after tons of research and test without have the right solutions.

  Target:

  (1) I have a 12.1.0.2 database unique main enterprise 'testdb' as database instance running on the server "node1".

  (2) I created physical standby database "stbydb" on the server "node2".

  (3) DataGuard running on the mode of MaxAvailability (SYNC) with roll forward in real time 12 default c apply.

  (4) primary database has 3 groups of one-man redo. (/oraredo/testdb/redo01.log redo02.log redo03.log)

  (5) I've created 4 standby redo logfiles (/oraredo/testdb/stby01.log stby02.log stby03.log stby04.log)

  (6) I do RMAN backup (database and archivelog) on the site of relief only.

  (7) I want to use this backup for full restore of the database on the primary database.

  He is a DR test to simulate the scenario that has lost every primary & Eve total servers.

  Here is how to save, on the database pending:

  (1) performance 'alter database recover managed standby database Cancel' to ensure that compatible data files

  (2) RMAN > backup database;

  (3) RMAN > backup archivelog all;

  I got elements of backup and copied to primary db Server something like:

  /Home/Oracle/backupset/o1_mf_nnndf_TAG20151002T133329_c0xq099p_.BKP (data files)

  /Home/Oracle/backupset/o1_mf_ncsnf_TAG20151002T133329_c0xq0sgz_.BKP (spfile & controlfile)

  /Home/Oracle/backupset/o1_mf_annnn_TAG20151002T133357_c0xq15xf_.BKP (archivelogs)

  So here's how to restore, on the main site:

  I clean all the files (data files, controlfiles oder all gone).

  (1) restore spfile from pfile

  RMAN > startup nomount

  RMAN > restore spfile from pfile ' / home/oracle/pfile.txt' to ' / home/oracle/backupset/o1_mf_ncsnf_TAG20151002T133329_c0xq0sgz_.bkp';

  (2) modify pfile to convert to db primary content. pFile shows below

  *.audit_file_dest='/opt/Oracle/DB/admin/testdb/adump '

  * .audit_trail = "db".

  * full = '12.1.0.2.0'

  *.control_files='/oradata/testdb/control01.ctl','/orafra/testdb/control02.ctl'

  * .db_block_size = 8192

  * .db_domain = "

  *.db_file_name_convert='/testdb/','/testdb /'

  * .db_name = "testdb".

  * .db_recovery_file_dest ='/ orafra'

  * .db_recovery_file_dest_size = 10737418240

  * .db_unique_name = "testdb".

  *.diagnostic_dest='/opt/Oracle/DB '

  * .fal_server = "stbydb".

  * .log_archive_config = 'dg_config = (testdb, stbydb)'

  * .log_archive_dest_2 = "service = stbydb SYNC valid_for = (ONLINE_LOGFILE, PRIMARY_ROLE) db_unique_name = stbydb'"

  * .log_archive_dest_state_2 = 'ENABLE '.

  *.log_file_name_convert='/testdb/','/testdb /'

  * .memory_target = 1800 m

  * .open_cursors = 300

  * runoff = 300

  * .remote_login_passwordfile = "EXCLUSIVE."

  * .standby_file_management = "AUTO".

  * .undo_tablespace = "UNDOTBS1.

  (3) restart db with updated file pfile

  SQLPLUS > create spfile from pfile='/home/oracle/pfile.txt'

  SQLPLUS > the judgment

  SQLPLUS > startup nomount

  (4) restore controlfile

  RMAN > restore primary controlfile to ' / home/oracle/backupset/o1_mf_ncsnf_TAG20151002T133329_c0xq0sgz_.bkp';

  RMAN > change the editing of the database

  (5) all elements of backup catalog

  RMAN > catalog starts by ' / home/oracle/backupset / '.

  (6) restore and recover the database

  RMAN > restore database;

  RMAN > recover database until the SNA XXXXXX; (this YVERT is the maximum in archivelog backups that extends beyond the scn of the backup of the data file)

  (7) open resetlogs

  RMAN > alter database open resetlogs;

  Everything seems perfect, except one of the file log roll forward pending is not generated

  SQL > select * from v$ standby_log;

  ERROR:

  ORA-00308: cannot open archived log ' / oraredo/testdb/stby01.log'

  ORA-27037: unable to get file status

  Linux-x86_64 error: 2: no such file or directory

  Additional information: 3

  no selected line

  I intended to use the same backup to restore primary basic & helps record traffic and the downtime between them in the world of real output.

  So I have exactly the same steps (except STANDBY restore CONTROLFILE and not recover after database restore) to restore the database pending.

  And I got the same missing log file.

  The problem is:

  (1) complete alert.log filled with this error, not the concern here

  (2) now repeat it in real time apply won't work since the Party shall LGWR shows always "WAITING_FOR_LOG."

  (3) I can't delete and re-create this log file

  Then I tried several and found:

  The missing standby logfile was still 'ACTIVE' at present RMAN backup was made.

  For example, on db standby, under Group #4 (stby01.log) would be lost after the restoration.

  SQL > select GROUP #, SEQUENCE #, USE (s), the STATUS from v$ standby_log;

  GROUP # SEQUENCE # USED STATUS

  ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

  4 19 ACTIVE 133632

  5 0 0 UNASSIGNED

  6 0 0 not ASSIGNED

  7 0 0 UNASSIGNED

  So until I take the backup, I tried on the primary database:

  SQL > alter system set log_archive_dest_state_2 = delay;

  This was the Group of standby_log side Eve #4 was released:

  SQL > select GROUP #, SEQUENCE #, USE (s), the STATUS from v$ standby_log;

  GROUP # SEQUENCE # USED STATUS

  ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

  4 0 0 UNASSIGNED

  5 0 0 UNASSIGNED

  6 0 0 not ASSIGNED

  7 0 0 UNASSIGNED

  Then, the backup has been restored correctly without missing standby logfile.

  However, to change this primary database means break DataGuard protection when you perform the backup. It's not accept on the production environment.

  Finally, my real questions come:

  (1) what I do may not do on parameter change?

  (2) I know I can re-create the control file to redo before delete and then recreate after. Is there any simple/fast to avoid the standby logfile lost or recreate the lost one?

  I understand that there are a number of ways to circumvent this. Something to keep a copy of the log file waiting restoration progress and copy up one missing, etc, etc...

  And yes I always have done no real-time applies "to the aid of archived logfile" but is also not accept mode of protection of production.

  I just want proof that the design (which is displayed in a few oracle doc Doc ID 602299.1 is one of those) that backs up data backup works effectively and can be used to restore the two site. And it may be without spending more time to resume backups or put the load on the primary database to create the database before.

  Your idea is very much appreciated.

  Thank you!

  Hello

  1--> when I take via RMAN backup, RMAN does not redo log (ORL or SRL) file, so we cannot expect ORLs or SRL would be restored.

  2nd--> when we opened the ORL database should be deleted and created

  3rd--> Expecting, SRL should not be an issue.we should be able to do away with the fall.

  DR sys@cdb01 SQL > select THREAD #, SEQUENCE #, GROUP #, STATUS from v$ standby_log;

  THREAD # SEQUENCE # GROUP # STATUS

  ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

  1 233 4 ACTIVE

  1 238 5 ACTIVE

  DR sys@cdb01 SQL > select * from v$ logfile;

  GROUP # STATUS TYPE MEMBER IS_ CON_ID

  ---------- ------- ------- ------------------------------ --- ----------

  3 /u03/cdb01/cdb01/redo03.log no. 0 online

  /U03/cdb01/cdb01/redo02.log no. 0 2 online

  1 /u03/cdb01/cdb01/redo01.log no. 0 online

  4 /u03/cdb01/cdb01/stdredo01.log WATCH No. 0

  /U03/cdb01/cdb01/stdredo02.log EVE 5 No. 0

  DR sys@cdb01 SQL > ! ls - ltr /u03/cdb01/cdb01/stdredo01.log

  method: cannot access the /u03/cdb01/cdb01/stdredo01.log: no such file or directory

  DR sys@cdb01 SQL >! ls - ltr /u03/cdb01/cdb01/stdredo02.log

  -rw - r-. 1 oracle oinstall 52429312 17 Oct 15:32 /u03/cdb01/cdb01/stdredo02.log

  DR sys@cdb01 SQL > alter database force claire logfile 4;

  change the database group claire logfile 4

  *

  ERROR on line 1:

  ORA-01156: recovery or current flashback may need access to files

  DR sys@cdb01 SQL > alter database recover managed standby database cancel;

  Database altered.

  DR sys@cdb01 SQL > change the database group claire logfile 4;

  Database altered.

  DR sys@cdb01 SQL > ! ls - ltr /u03/cdb01/cdb01/stdredo01.log

  -rw - r-. 1 oracle oinstall 52429312 17 Oct 15:33 /u03/cdb01/cdb01/stdredo01.log

  DR sys@cdb01 SQL >

  If you do, you can recreate the controlfile without waiting for redo log entry...

  If you still think it's something is not acceptable, you must have SR with support to analyze why he does not abandon SRL when controlfile_type is "underway".

  Thank you

• SRM does not wait for the guests of the DPM enabled

  Hello

  We are testing our environment vsphere 5/SRM and essentially 5, everything goes very well except for wake up initiated by the SRM to the DPM active guests.

  --------------------------------

  The SRM 5.0 doco States:

  SRM temporarily disables DPM for the cluster, and ensures that all guests there are lit before recovery begins. After the recovery or the test is completed, SRM reactive DPM for the cluster, but it hosts are found in the current state of execution while DPM is able to feed them downwards as needed.

  --------------------------------

  The question that we see is that SRM send indeed wake up for guests in mode standby and milestone of recovery as a success. The problem is that SRM does not wait until the guests are completely turned on before before feeding on the VMs. The day before hosts to wake the system correctly storage access newly presented no problem. The problem is that the bubbles to test network is not created on the hosts of the day before and no VMs are assigned to these hosts during the entire test.

  That said, I checked the advanced settings and I cannot find a setting that will force SRM to wait for the standby hosts to be fully integrated in the cluster before you perform additional steps.

  Everyone knows this behavior? Am I missing a setting somwhere? My fear is that this behavior will happen during a real failover and potentially cause problems.

  Thank you for your time,

  Smokey

  Hello

  This should not happen.

  Can you please open a SR, download bundle Journal, engineers will be able to understand what is happening?

  Once you open a case, display the number of SR.

  Michael.

• I try and put music on my phone through the Apple music and it says something about waiting for 90 days. Anyone know what it is or how to ignore it?

  I try and put music on my phone through the Apple music and it says something about waiting for 90 days. Anyone know what it is or how to ignore it?

  Looks like you may have recently changes your Apple ID you use iTunes on your iPhone.  When you change this ID, you are locked for 90 days.  You can change to another code, but you can download past purchases or save the content on your device until the expiry of this original lock.  When you change IDs the first time it is a nice warning that appears and asks if you are sure that you'll be locked in this ID for 90 days.  There is no way around the lock, other only of waiting.  I think that this prevents you form jittering in all your Apple ID friends and just download all, but that's probably what you're going through right now.  Good luck!

• Two "wait for Notification" with notifier unique?

  I feel like I should know the answer, but my code was buggy when I did.

  Can you have several screws 'wait for Notification"attached to the same notifier?

  Aid seems to suggest that the notifiers are only for two independent loops:

  Notifiers are a communication tool between the parties independent of a block diagram or two screws running on the same computer.

  Can you have several 'wait for Notification"live attached to the same notifier?

   

  Yes

  See the example to notify a demultiplexer.

  

• Windows 7 Edition Home Premium or wait for Windows 8

  Hello

  My six year, Sony's all-in-one PC is running slower and slower despite the developed and needs to be replaced this year. My dilemma is whether to replace now, probably with a laptop with screen 17.3 inch under Windows 7 Home Premium or wait for Windows 8 released. To use PC home and I'm a relatively unsohisticated user. Any advice much appreciated.

  Before getting a new laptop or PC, check their website to see if they already Win8 pilots. If so and you want something that looks like XP, I'd go for scope Win7 in time Win8 once it is released. A lot of the manufacturer may offer a "anytime upgrade" of Win7 for Win8 with the purchase of their product. Dell and others who did when Win7 is out; you buy a PC with XP installed, and you could get the upgrade later for a reduced price (and in some cases, free).

  I tried Win8 consumer Preview and really don't care for her. I'm not an iPad or iPhone user (I use my cell phone as a phone, not a computer), so I'm not all that familiar with the concept of full tile to do things. Give me a Start Menu and I'm happy :-)

  Of course, these are just my opinions, and I don't know there are many others who will be either agree or disagree with me, and that's ok. Diversity is what keeps life interesting :-)

  SC Tom