IPSEC tunnel between 2 7606 PE

Similar Questions

• IPSec tunnel between a client connection mobility and WRV200

  Someone has set up an IPSec tunnel between a client connection mobility and WRV200? I can't get the right configuration.

  Agitation, these products are treated by the Cisco Small Business support community. Please refer to the URL: https://supportforums.cisco.com/community/netpro/small-business

• Problem on the establishment of a GRE/IPsec tunnel between 2 cisco routers

  Hello world

  I am trying to establish a GRE IPsec tunnel between two cisco routers (2620XM and a 836).

  I created a tunnel interfaces on both routers as follows.

  2620XM

  interface Tunnel0

  IP 10.1.5.2 255.255.255.252

  tunnel source x.x.x.x

  tunnel destination y.y.y.y

  end

  836

  interface Tunnel0

  IP 10.1.5.1 255.255.255.252

  tunnel source y.y.y.y

  tunnel destination x.x.x.x

  end

  and configuration of isakmp/ipsec as follows,

  2620XM

  crypto ISAKMP policy 10

  md5 hash

  preshared authentication

  ISAKMP crypto key {keys} address y.y.y.y no.-xauth

  !

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac to_melissia

  !

  myvpn 9 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  defined peer y.y.y.y

  Set transform-set to_melissia

  match address 101

  2620XM-router #sh ip access list 101

  Expand the access IP 101 list

  10 permit host x.x.x.x y.y.y.y host will

  836

  crypto ISAKMP policy 10

  md5 hash

  preshared authentication

  ISAKMP crypto key {keys} address x.x.x.x No.-xauth

  !

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac to_metamorfosi

  !

  myvpn 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  defined peer x.x.x.x

  Set transform-set to_metamorfosi

  match address 101

  836-router #sh access list 101

  Expand the access IP 101 list

  10 licences will host host x.x.x.x y.y.y.y

  Unfortunately I had no isakmp security associations at all and when I enter the debugging to this output.

  CRYPTO: IPSEC (crypto_map_check_encrypt_core): CRYPTO: removed package as currently being created cryptomap.

  Any ideas why I get this result? Any help will be a great help

  Thank you!!!

  I think it's possible. It seems to me that you are assuming that the address of the interface where goes the card encryption is peering address. While this is the default action, it is possible to configure it differently.

  As you have discovered the card encryption must be on the physical output interface. If you want the peering address to have a different value of the physical interface address outgoing, then you can add this command to your crypto card:

  card crypto-address

  so if you put loopback0 as the id_interface then he would use loopback0 as peering address even if the card encryption may be affected on serial0/0 or another physical interface.

  HTH

  Rick

• Public static IPsec tunnel between two routers cisco [VRF aware]

  Hi all

  I am trying to configure static IPsec tunnel between two routers. Router R1 has [no VRF] only global routing table.

  Router R2 has two routing tables:

  * vrf INET - used for internet connectivity

  * global routing table - used for VPN connections

  Here are the basic configs:

  R1

  crypto ISAKMP policy 1
  BA 3des
  md5 hash
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  ISAKMP crypto key 7V7u841k2D3Q7v98d6Y4z0zF address 203.0.0.3
  invalid-spi-recovery crypto ISAKMP
  !
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac TRSET_AES-256_SHA
  transport mode
  !
  Crypto ipsec TUNNEL-IPSEC-PROTECTION profile
  game of transformation-TRSET_AES-256_SHA
  !
  interface Loopback0
  10.0.1.1 IP address 255.255.255.255
  IP ospf 1 zone 0
  !
  interface Tunnel0
  IP 192.168.255.34 255.255.255.252
  IP ospf 1 zone 0
  source of tunnel FastEthernet0/0
  tunnel destination 203.0.0.3
  ipv4 ipsec tunnel mode
  Ipsec TUNNEL-IPSEC-PROTEC protection tunnel profile
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/0
  IP 102.0.0.1 255.255.255.0

  !

  IP route 203.0.0.3 255.255.255.255 FastEthernet0/0 102.0.0.2

  #######################################################

  R2

  IP vrf INET
  RD 1:1
  !
  Keyring cryptographic test vrf INET
  address of pre-shared-key 102.0.0.1 key 7V7u841k2D3Q7v98d6Y4z0zF
  !
  crypto ISAKMP policy 1
  BA 3des
  md5 hash
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  invalid-spi-recovery crypto ISAKMP
  crypto isakmp profile test
  door-key test
  function identity address 102.0.0.1 255.255.255.255
  !
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac TRSET_AES-256_SHA
  transport mode
  !
  Crypto ipsec TUNNEL-IPSEC-PROTECTION profile
  game of transformation-TRSET_AES-256_SHA
  Test Set isakmp-profile
  !
  interface Loopback0
  IP 10.0.2.2 255.255.255.255
  IP ospf 1 zone 0
  !
  interface Tunnel0
  IP 192.168.255.33 255.255.255.252
  IP ospf 1 zone 0
  source of tunnel FastEthernet0/0
  tunnel destination 102.0.0.1
  ipv4 ipsec tunnel mode
  tunnel vrf INET
  Ipsec TUNNEL-IPSEC-PROTEC protection tunnel profile
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/0
  IP vrf forwarding INET
  IP 203.0.0.3 255.255.255.0

  !

  IP route 102.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 FastEthernet0/0 203.0.0.2

  #######################################################

  There is a router between R1 and R2, it is used only for connectivity:

  interface FastEthernet0/0
  IP 102.0.0.2 255.255.255.0
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/1
  IP 203.0.0.2 255.255.255.0

  The problem that the tunnel is not coming, I can't pass through phase I.

  The IPsec VPN are not my strength. So if someone could show me what mistake I make, I'd appreciate it really.

  I joined ouptup #debug R2 crypto isakmp

  Source and destination Tunnel0 is belong to VRF INET, the static route need to be updated.

  IP route vrf INET 102.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 FastEthernet0/0 203.0.0.2

  crypto isakmp profile test

  VRF INET

  door-key test
  function identity address 102.0.0.1 255.255.255.255

• IPSec tunnels between duplicate LAN subnets

  Hi all

  Please help to connect three sites with our Central site has all the resources for users, including internet access.

  The three sites will be the ASA 5505 like their WAN device.

  We need to know is - it possible, allowing to configure an IPsec Tunnel between the three ASA with duplicate LAN subnets.

  Central site two networks 192.168.1.x 24, 192.168.100.x 24

  Distance a 24 192.168.1.x subnet

  Two remote a subnet 192.168.100.x 24

  If it is possible we also do hair distance one ping, above two remote to the Central Site to access internet, what sites need are on the Central Site, including e-mail, network, other resource also records.

  We have no other way to make this network, as all security is on our Central Site, website filtering, Application filtering, filtering of network traffic all.

  We understand that we can change two remote sites to a different subnet from the Central Site, but we have so many host devices, it will take weeks or months, so to change the MS AD domain for all users, servers too.

  We really need your expertise to do this in a laboratory and then in production.

  Thank you

  Hello Stephen,

  You can check the following links for the subnets overlap talk to each other:-

  1 LAN-to-LAN IPsec VPN with overlapping networks

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a0080b37d0b.shtml

  2 IPsec between two IOS routers with overlapping of private networks

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps5855/products_configuration_example09186a0080a0ece4.shtml

  Important point is local network must connect to the remote network via the translated addresses.

  for example, you won't be ablt to use real IP of the communication.

  For haripinning or turning U:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00805734ae.shtml

  Hope that helps.

  Kind regards

  Dinesh Moudgil

• IPSec Tunnel between Cisco 2801 and Netscren 50 with NAT and static

  Hello

  My problem isn't really the IPSec connection between two devices (it is already done...) But my problem is that I have a mail server on the site of Cisco, who have a static NAT from inside to outside. Due to the static NAT, I do not see the server in the VPN tunnel. I found a document that almost describes the problem:

  "Configuration of a router IPSEC Tunnel private-to-private network with NAT and static" (Document ID 14144)

  NAT takes place before the encryption verification!

  In this document, the solution is 'routing policy' using the loopback interface. But, how can I handle this with the Netscreen firewall. Someone has an idea?

  Thanks for any help

  Best regards

  Heiko

  Hello

  Try to change your static NAT with static NAT based policy.

  That is to say the static NAT should not be applicable for VPN traffic

  permissible static route map 1

  corresponds to the IP 104

  access-list 104 refuse host ip 10.1.110.10 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0

  access-list 104 allow the host ip 10.1.110.10 all

  IP nat inside source static 10.1.110.10 81.222.33.90 map of static route

  HTH

  Kind regards

  GE.

• I can weight of the IPSec Tunnels between ASAs

  Hello

  Remote site: link internet NYC 150 MB/s

  Local site: link internet Baltimore 400 MB/s

  Backup site: link internet Washington 200 Mb/s

  My main site and my backup site are connected via a gigabit Ethernet circuit between the respective base site switches.  Each site has its own internet connection and my OSPF allows to switch their traffic to the backup site if the main website is down.  We are opening an office in New York with one ASA unique connected to 150 Mbps FIOS internet circuit.  We want to set up an IPSec tunnel on the main site and the backup on the remote site, but want the remote site to prefer the tunnel in Baltimore, except if it is down.

  Interesting traffic would be the same for the two tunnels

  I know that ASA cannot be a GRE endpoint.  How can I force the New York traffic through the tunnel in Baltimore as long as it works?  An IPSec tunnel can be weighted?

  Thank you

  It is not in itself weighting, but you can create up to 10 backup over LAN to LAN VPN IPsec peers.

  For each tunnel, the security apparatus tried to negotiate with the first peer in the list. If this peer does not respond, the security apparatus made his way to the bottom of the list until a peer responds, or there is no peer more in the list.

  Reference.

• IPSec tunnel between 2 routers

  Hello

  I am trying to configure an IPSec VPN tunnel between 2 routers Cisco, connected to the internet via the ATM interface, my router is a 1841 with the network 10.200.36.0 address the remote router is a Cisco network 192.168.9.0 address with 877.

  I have tryied to follow some tutorials, unsuccessfully, because I can't always ping all IP addresses on the remote network and also the VPN tunnel is not up!

  Can help you please give me a configuration model, or maybe let me know how to configure step by step on mine and remote router?

  Thank you very much!

  Concerning

  Riccardo

  Here is an example. x.x.x.x and y.y.y.y are the public IPs of routers:

  ROUTER1 hostname

  !

  crypto ISAKMP policy 10

  BA aes 256

  AUTH pre

  Group 5

  !

  ISAKMP crypto key cisco1234 address y.y.y.y

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES256-SHA1 esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac

  !

  Profile of crypto ipsec TunnelProfile

  the transform ESP-AES256-SHA1 value

  !

  interface Tunnel0

  IP 10.255.255.0 255.255.255.254

  tunnel Dialer source 0

  tunnel destination y.y.y.y

  ipv4 ipsec tunnel mode

  Tunnel TunnelProfile ipsec protection profile

  !

  interface Dialer0

  IP x.x.x.x

  !

  IP route 192.168.9.0 255.255.255.0 Tunnel0

  hostname ROUTER2

  !

  crypto ISAKMP policy 10

  BA aes 256

  AUTH pre

  Group 5

  !

  ISAKMP crypto cisco1234 key address x.x.x.x

  !

  Crypto ipsec ESP-AES256-SHA1 transform-set esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac

  !

  Profile of crypto ipsec TunnelProfile

  the transform ESP-AES256-SHA1 value

  !

  interface Tunnel0

  IP 10.255.255.1 255.255.255.254

  tunnel Dialer source 0

  tunnel destination x.x.x.x

  ipv4 ipsec tunnel mode

  Tunnel TunnelProfile ipsec protection profile

  !

  interface Dialer0

  IP address y.y.y.y

  !

  IP route 10.200.36.0 255.255.255.0 Tunnel0

  --
  Don't stop once you have upgraded your network! Improve the world by lending money to low-income workers:
  http://www.Kiva.org/invitedBy/karsteni

• Double IPSec tunnel between routers

  I am facing the following challenge:

  I have two routers and want to build two IPSec encapsulated between them, with the help of ASIT tunnel interfaces.

  The interaces two tunnel would in that case the same source and destination ip addresses.

  With a single tunnel interface defined, it works well, however, as soon as the second tunnel interface is defined, the first breaks down.

  Here is an example configuration:

  interface Tunnel0
  IP 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.252
  source of tunnel Serial1/0
  tunnel destination 10.1.1.6
  ipv4 ipsec tunnel mode
  protection of ipsec profile ipsecprofile tunnel
  !
  Tunnel1 interface
  IP 192.168.1.5 255.255.255.252
  source of tunnel Serial1/0
  tunnel destination 10.1.1.6
  ipv4 ipsec tunnel mode
  protection of ipsec profile ipsecprofile tunnel
  !

  In fact, the matter is rather a conceptual issue than a direct. What is the root cause, this type of configuration does not work?

  ESP protocol is the distinction between endponits ESP SAs based on SPI identifier as well, isn't? If so, what is wrong here?

  Thanks in advance...

  Hi Frank,.

  As a general rule, you cannot have two interfaces of tunnel with the same tunnel source (series 1/0) and destinations (10.1.1.6) tunnel; with the same method (ipv4) tunel.

  The work around that would be to bounce one of the tunnels on a loopback interface.

  This tunnel 1: tunnel_interface_1 - series 1/0---internet---10.1.1.6

  and tunnel 2: tunnel_interface_2---loopback---serial1/0---internet---10.1.1.6

  In this way the two tunnels can be up at the same time.

  I hope this helps.

  -Shrikant

  P.S.: Please check question one answer, if it has been resolved. Note the useful messages. Thank you.

• Traffic is failed on plain IPSec tunnel between two 892 s

  Have a weird case and you are looking for some suggestions/thougs where to dig because I have exhausted the options.

  Note: I replaced the Networkid real to a mentined below.

  Topology: a classic IPSec VPN tunnel between two 892 s of Cisco, with pre-shared key and no GRE. A 892 (branch_892) has access to the Internet using PPPoE and has three network / VLAN behind it. A VLAN is coordinated to the PPPoE internet access. Access to the other two VLAN - VL92 (100.100.200.0/24) and VL93 (100.100.100.0/24) is performed via the VPN tunnel.

  Second 892 (892_DC) has just one interface - WAN on Gigabit enabled/connected and a static route to the default GW. It doesn't have any defined interal network. If the router is strictly used to send traffic to VL92/VL93 to the domestic 892 via IPSec tunnel.

  Here's the problem: access to VL93 (100.100.100.0/24) works, however for VL92 (100.100.100.0/24) - does not work.

  Devices in VL92 I ping IP address of 892_DC through the VPN tunnel. The 892_DC router I can ping devices in VL92. However, I can't VL92 ping any device beyond the 892_DC and at the same time the packets arriving on 892_DC for VL92 are not sent through the VPN tunnel.

  I took the package trace on 892_DC using capture point/buffer to nathalie caron to VL92 packages and saw that the traffic coming to the 892_DC. I run the nathalie caron even on Branch_892, and there was not a single package.

  So... What's the problem? More interesting, I modified the way left on VL92 access list and still - no packets are sent through the tunnel.

  Any idea? Two routers config are below

  -------

  892_DC #show ru

  !

  crypto ISAKMP policy 10

  BA aes 256

  hash sha256

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  isakmp encryption key * address 1.2.3.4

  ISAKMP crypto keepalive 10 periodicals

  !

  address of 1.2.3.4 crypto isakmp peers

  Description of-COIL-892

  !

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set IT-IPSec-Transform-Set esp - aes 256 sha256-esp-hmac

  Crypto ipsec df - bit clear

  !

  map IT ipsec - IPSec crypto - Crypto - map 10-isakmp

  defined peer 1.2.3.4

  disable the kilobytes of life together - the security association

  86400 seconds, life of security association set

  the transform-set IT-IPSec-Transform-Set value

  match a lists 101

  market arriere-route

  QoS before filing

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0

  IP 10,20,30,40 255.255.255.240

  IP 1400 MTU

  IP tcp adjust-mss 1360

  automatic duplex

  automatic speed

  card crypto IT-IPSec-Crypto-map

  !

  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.20.30.41

  !

  access list 101 ip allow any 100.100.100.0 0.0.0.255 connect

  access list 101 ip allow any 100.100.200.0 0.0.0.255 connect

  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Branch_892 #sh run

  !

  crypto ISAKMP policy 10

  BA aes 256

  hash sha256

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  isakmp encryption key * address 10,20,30,40

  ISAKMP crypto keepalive 10 periodicals

  !

  address peer isakmp crypto 10,20,30,40

  !

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set IT-IPSec-Transform-Set esp - aes 256 sha256-esp-hmac

  Crypto ipsec df - bit clear

  !

  map IT ipsec - IPSec crypto - Crypto - map 10-isakmp

  defined peer 10,20,30,40

  disable the kilobytes of life together - the security association

  86400 seconds, life of security association set

  the transform-set IT-IPSec-Transform-Set value

  match address 101

  market arriere-route

  QoS before filing

  !

  FastEthernet6 interface

  Description VL92

  switchport access vlan 92

  !

  interface FastEthernet7

  Description VL93

  switchport access vlan 93

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0

  Description # to WAN #.

  no ip address

  automatic duplex

  automatic speed

  PPPoE-client dial-pool-number 1

  !

  interface Vlan1

  Description # local to #.

  IP 192.168.1.254 255.255.255.0

  IP nat inside

  IP virtual-reassembly in

  !

  interface Vlan92

  Description fa6-nexus e100/0/40

  IP 100.100.200.1 255.255.255.0

  !

  interface Vlan93

  Description fa7-nexus e100/0/38

  IP 100.100.100.1 255.255.255.0

  !

  interface Dialer0

  no ip address

  No cdp enable

  !

  interface Dialer1

  IP 1.2.3.4 255.255.255.248

  IP mtu 1454

  NAT outside IP

  IP virtual-reassembly in max-pumping 256

  encapsulation ppp

  IP tcp adjust-mss 1414

  Dialer pool 1

  Dialer-Group 1

  Authentication callin PPP chap Protocol

  PPP chap hostname ~ ~ ~

  PPP chap password =.

  No cdp enable

  card crypto IT-IPSec-Crypto-map

  !

  Dialer-list 1 ip protocol allow

  !

  access-list 101 permit ip 100.100.100.0 0.0.0.255 any

  access-list 101 permit ip 100.100.200.0 0.0.0.255 any

  !

  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1

  Yes correct sounds - so another possible problem is the routing is routing 100% correct on both sides? Can you put the two sides config for review?

• NAT in the IPSec tunnel between 2 routers x IOS (877)

  Hi all

  We have a customer with 2 x 877 routers connected to the internet. These routers are configured with an IPSec tunnel (which works fine). The question is the inbound static NAT translation problems with the tunnel - port 25 is mapped to the address inside the mail server. The existing configuration works very well for incoming mail, but prevents users from access to the direct mail server (using the private IP address) on port 25.

  Here is the Config NAT:

  nat INET_POOL netmask 255.255.255.252 IP pool

  IP nat inside source map route INET_NAT pool INET_POOL overload

  IP nat inside source static tcp 10.10.0.8 25 25 expandable

  IP nat inside source static tcp 10.10.0.8 80 80 extensible

  IP nat inside source static tcp 10.10.0.8 443 443 extensible

  IP nat inside source static tcp 10.10.0.7 1433 1433 extensible

  IP nat inside source static tcp 10.10.0.7 extensible 3389 3389

  allowed INET_NAT 1 route map

  corresponds to the IP 101

  access-list 101 deny ip 10.10.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 101 permit ip 10.10.0.0 0.0.0.255 any

  On the SAA, I would setup a NAT exemption, but how do I get the same thing in the IOS?

  See you soon,.

  Luke

  Take a look at this link:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/iOS/12_2t/12_2t4/feature/guide/ftnatrt.html

  Concerning

  Farrukh

• Multiple IPSec tunnels between two international research reports

  Hello, I have a no. 2851 to HQ and 2821 2nd site. Using IPSec VPN to connect two LANs and it works very well. Now, I want to connect another local network on each site through the same VPN. I want to separate the traffic between the LANs. Is this possible?

  You cannot use another crypto card if you must use the same IP for the peers you.

  If you have other addresses ip at each end to close the tunnel, you can use another crypto card.

  If the answer is no, then you can manipulate you acl of the traffic of interest to decide which lan can reach for witch lan.

• Problem with IPSEC tunnel between Cisco PIX and Cisco ASA

  Hi all!

  Have a strange problem with one of our tunnel ipsec for one of our customers, we can open the tunnel of the customers of the site, but not from our site, don't understand what's wrong, if it would be a configuration problem should can we not all up the tunnel.

  On our side as initiator:

  Jan 14 13:53:26 172.27.1.254% PIX-7-702208: ISAKMP Phase 1 Exchange started (local 1.1.1.1 (initiator), remote 2.2.2.2)

  Jan 14 13:53:26 172.27.1.254% PIX-7-702210: Exchange of ISAKMP Phase 1 is complete (local 1.1.1.1 (initiator), remote 2.2.2.2)

  Jan 14 13:53:26 172.27.1.254% 6-PIX-602202: ISAKMP connected session (local 1.1.1.1 (initiator), remote 2.2.2.2)

  Jan 14 13:53:26 172.27.1.254% PIX-6-602201: Phase 1 ISAKMP Security Association created (local 1.1.1.1/500 (initiator), 2.2.2.2/500 remotely, authentication = pre-action, encryption = 3DES-CBC, hash = SHA, group = 2, life = 86400 s)

  Jan 14 13:53:26 172.27.1.254% PIX-7-702209: ISAKMP Phase 2 Exchange started (local 1.1.1.1 (initiator), remote 2.2.2.2)

  Jan 14 13:53:26 172.27.1.254% PIX-7-702201: ISAKMP Phase 1 delete received (local 1.1.1.1 (initiator), remote 2.2.2.2)

  Jan 14 13:53:26 172.27.1.254% PIX-6-602203: ISAKMP disconnected session (local 1.1.1.1 (initiator), remote 2.2.2.2)

  Jan 14 13:53:56 172.27.1.254% PIX-7-702303: sa_request, CBC (MSG key in English) = 1.1.1.1, dest = 2.2.2.2, src_proxy = 172.27.1.10/255.255.255.255/0/0 (type = 1), dest_proxy = 192.168.100.18/255.255.255.255/0/0 (type = 1), Protocol is ESP transform = lifedur hmac-sha-esp, esp-3des 28800 = s and 4608000 Ko, spi = 0 x 0 (0), id_conn = 0, keysize = 0, flags = 0 x 4004

  The site of the customer like an answering machine:

  14 jan 11:58:23 172.27.1.254% PIX-7-702208: ISAKMP Phase 1 Exchange started (local 1.1.1.1 (answering machine), 2.2.2.2 remote)

  14 jan 11:58:23 172.27.1.254% PIX-7-702210: Exchange of ISAKMP Phase 1 is complete (local 1.1.1.1 (answering machine), 2.2.2.2 remote)

  14 jan 11:58:23 172.27.1.254% 6-PIX-602202: ISAKMP connected session (local 1.1.1.1 (answering machine), 2.2.2.2 remote)

  14 jan 11:58:23 172.27.1.254% PIX-6-602201: Phase 1 ISAKMP Security Association created (local 1.1.1.1/500 (answering machine), distance 2.2.2.2/500, authentication = pre-action, encryption = 3DES-CBC, hash = MD5, group = 1, life = 86400 s)

  14 jan 11:58:23 172.27.1.254% PIX-7-702209: ISAKMP Phase 2 Exchange started (local 1.1.1.1 (answering machine), 2.2.2.2 remote)

  14 jan 11:58:23 172.27.1.254% PIX-6-602301: its created, (his) sa_dest = 2.2.2.2, sa_prot = 50, sa_spi = 0x9de820bd (2649235645) sa_trans = sa_conn_id of hmac-sha-esp, esp-3des = 116

  14 jan 11:58:23 172.27.1.254% PIX-7-702211: Exchange of ISAKMP Phase 2 is complete (local 1.1.1.1 (answering machine), 2.2.2.2 remote)

  Jan 14 12:28:54 172.27.1.254% PIX-6-602302: SA deletion, (his) sa_dest = 2.2.2.2, sa_prot = 50, sa_spi = 0x9de820bd (2649235645), sa_trans = esp-3desesp-sha-hmac, sa_conn_id = 116

  Kind regards

  Johan

  From my experience when a tunnel is launched on one side, but it is not on the other hand, that the problem is with an inconsistency of the isakmp and ipsec policies, mainly as ipsec policies change sets and corresponding address with ASA platform when a tunnel is not a statically defined encryption card he sometimes use the dynamic tag to allocate this vpn connection. To check if this is the case go ahead and make a "crypto ipsec to show his" when the tunnel is active on both sides, see on the SAA if the corresponding tunnel is the static encryption card set or if it presents the dynamic encryption card.

  I advise you to go to the settings on both sides and ensure that they are both in the opposite direction.

• IPSec Tunnel permanent between two ASA

  Hello

  I configured a VPN IPSec tunnel between two ASA 5505 firewall. I want to assure you as the IPSec tunnel (this is why the security association) is permanent and do not drop due to the idle state.

  What should I do?

  Thanks for any help

  Yves

  Disables keepalive IKE processing, which is enabled by default.

  (config) #tunnel - 10.165.205.222 group ipsec-attributes

  KeepAlive (ipsec-tunnel-config) #isakmp disable

  Set a maximum time for VPN connections with the command of vpn-session-timeout in group policy configuration mode or username configuration mode:

  attributes of hostname (config) #-Group Policy DfltGrpPolicy
  hostname (Group Policy-config) #vpn - idle - timeout no

  attributes of hostname (config) #-Group Policy DfltGrpPolicy
  hostname (Group Policy-config) #vpn - session - timeout no

  Thank you

  Ajay

• RV180 dhcp via IPSEC Tunnel

  Hello

  I have set up an ipsec tunnel between rv180 (site A) and asa5520 (site B) successful. The dhcp server to clients is on the B site. The dhcp clients request going through the tunnel, they leave the rv180 on the wan interface and arrive at site B with the wan-ipaddress from site A. The configured dhcp-relay on the website match the remote network (site B), configured in the on site A ipsec tunnel. Is there anyway that all traffic pass through the ipsec tunnel? We want it for security reasons.

  Any help is greatly appreciated.

  Ralf

  Dear Ralf,

  Thank you to reach small business support community.

  Unfortunately the relay DHCP Relay not of DHCP request to the IPSec VPN tunnel.  I hope that this answer to your question and do not hesitate to contact me if there is any additional help with what I can help you.

  Kind regards

  Jeffrey Rodriguez S... : | :. : | :.
  Support Engineer Cisco client

  * Please rate the Post so other will know when an answer has been found.