RV180 dhcp via IPSEC Tunnel
Hello
I have set up an ipsec tunnel between rv180 (site A) and asa5520 (site B) successful. The dhcp server to clients is on the B site. The dhcp clients request going through the tunnel, they leave the rv180 on the wan interface and arrive at site B with the wan-ipaddress from site A. The configured dhcp-relay on the website match the remote network (site B), configured in the on site A ipsec tunnel. Is there anyway that all traffic pass through the ipsec tunnel? We want it for security reasons.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Ralf
Dear Ralf,
Thank you to reach small business support community.
Unfortunately the relay DHCP Relay not of DHCP request to the IPSec VPN tunnel. I hope that this answer to your question and do not hesitate to contact me if there is any additional help with what I can help you.
Kind regards
Jeffrey Rodriguez S... : | :. : | :.
Support Engineer Cisco client
* Please rate the Post so other will know when an answer has been found.
Tags: Cisco Support
Similar Questions
-
Send from FW traffic via IPSec tunnel
Hello
I have a FW in site B that needs to authenticate VPN users that connect to the FW in site B to an RSA RADIUS server to site A. So, this means that the FW would send traffic RADUIS via its peer interface to site A. At least that is how the RADIUS server in site A see traffic. The RADIUS server will see it as coming from au pair from right side of site B's IP address?
The public (peer) IP of the interface does not part of interesting traffic, and I wonder if it might bite me in the a$ $.
Does this make any sense?
Thank you!
Perhaps add it but make an exclusion of Protocol in the interesting traffic.
That is to say excluding isakmp and esp traffic.
I'm not sure if it will work, but its worth a try
-
Cisco recommended for the GRE VIA IPSEC router.
Hello world
I intend to connect our two remote locations via IPSEC tunnel, looking for the cheapest option available for the router options.
Do you have any good recommendations?
Have a nice weekend!!
Very appreciated
Hello
There is 1 that I love so much, it's 892fsp of Cisco.
It has 8-port switch, you can make l2tp vpn, free will, love, ips, zbf...
I hope this helps.
Thank you
PS: Please do not forget to rate and score as correct answer if this answered your question
-
Cannot reach the destination of an IPSec tunnel through another IPSec tunnel
Hi all
I have a PIX 515E version 8.0 (2).
I have two remote sites connected to this PIX via IPSec tunnels.
Each remote site can reach local networks behind the PIX, but I can't reach remoteSiteB remoteSiteA.
Thus,.
SiteA <----- ipsec="" -----="">PIX1 SiteX <---------------->10.0.8.1 10.30.8.254
SiteB <----- ipsec="" -----="">PIX1 SiteX <---------------->10.0.8.1 10.138.34.21
SiteA can ping SiteX
SiteB can ping SiteX
SiteA cannot ping SiteB
SiteB cannot ping SiteA
If I do not show crypto isakmp ipsec his I see appropriate subnets:
Tag crypto map: CRYPTO-MAP, seq num: 4, local addr: 203.166.1.1
permit access-list ACLVPN-TO_SITEA ip 10.138.34.16 255.255.255.240 host 10.30.8.254
local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (10.138.34.16/255.255.255.240/0/0)
Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (10.30.8.254/255.255.255.255/0/0)
current_peer: 104.86.2.4
Tag crypto map: CRYPTO-MAP, seq num: 5, local addr: 203.166.1.1
access-list ACLVPN-TO_SITEB allowed host ip 10.30.8.254 10.138.34.16 255.255.255.240
local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (10.30.8.254/255.255.255.255/0/0)
Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (10.138.34.16/255.255.255.240/0/0)
current_peer: 216.178.200.200
Journal messages that seem to point to the problem...
April 18, 2013 13:27:35: % PIX-4-402116: IPSEC: received a package of ESP (SPI = 0xD51BB13A, sequence number = 0x21A) 104.86.2.4 (user = 104.86.2.4) at 203.166.1.1. Inside the package décapsulés does not match policy negotiated in the SA. The package indicates its destination as 10.138.34.21, its source as 10.30.8.254 and its Protocol 6. SA specifies its local proxy like 10.0.8.0/255.255.255.0/0/0 and his remote_proxy as 10.30.8.254/255.255.255.255/0/0
My question is really what I have to do something funky to allow traffic to pass between the two tunnels?
Hello
This could be much easier if we have seen the real configurations.
But here are some things to be confirmed in the configurations (some of them you mentioned above, but I still quote once again)
- Make sure that each firewall, you set the appropriate VPN L2L ACL
- Make sure that you have configured NAT0 on the central PIX "outside" interface for the Site A and Site B
- Make sure the Central PIX has "same-security-traffic permit intra-interface" configured. This will allow the Site traffic to enter the Central PIX 'outside' interface and head back on the same interface to Site B. And vice versa.
To view some actual configurations that may be required provided everything else is ok. (I assume that all devices are Cisco)
Central PIX
permit same-security-traffic intra-interface
A connection to the site
SITE-A-CRYPTOMAP of the 10.0.8.0 ip access list allow 255.255.255.0 host 10.30.8.254
SITE-A-CRYPTOMAP of the 10.138.34.16 ip access list allow 255.255.255.240 host 10.30.8.254
Site B connection
SITE-B-CRYPTOMAP of the 10.0.8.0 ip access list allow 255.255.255.0 10.138.34.16 255.255.255.240
SITE-B-CRYPTOMAP to the list of allowed access host ip 10.30.8.254 10.138.34.16 255.255.255.240
NAT0
access list for the INTERIOR-NAT0 allowed ip 10.0.8.0 255.255.255.0 host 10.30.8.254
access list for the INTERIOR-NAT0 allowed ip 10.0.8.0 255.255.255.0 10.138.34.16 255.255.255.240
NAT (inside) 0-list of access to the INTERIOR-NAT0
OUTSIDE-NAT0 allowed host ip 10.30.8.254 access list 10.138.34.16 255.255.255.240
OUTSIDE-NAT0 allowed ip 10.138.34.16 access list 255.255.255.240 host 10.30.8.254
NAT (outside) 0-list of access OUTSIDE-NAT0
Site has
CENTRAL-SITE-CRYPTOMAP to the list of allowed access host ip 10.30.8.254 10.0.8.0 255.255.255.0
CENTRAL-SITE-CRYPTOMAP to the list of allowed access host ip 10.30.8.254 10.138.34.16 255.255.255.240
the INTERIOR-NAT0 allowed host ip 10.30.8.254 access list 10.0.8.0 255.255.255.0
the INTERIOR-NAT0 allowed host ip 10.30.8.254 access list 10.138.34.16 255.255.255.240
NAT (inside) 0-list of access to the INTERIOR-NAT0
Site B---------------->----->---------------->----->
CENTRAL-SITE-CRYPTOMAP of the 10.138.34.16 ip access list allow 255.255.255.240 10.0.8.0 255.255.255.0
CENTRAL-SITE-CRYPTOMAP of the 10.138.34.16 ip access list allow 255.255.255.240 host 10.30.8.254
the INTERIOR-NAT0 allowed host ip 10.138.34.16 access list 255.255.255.240 10.0.8.0 255.255.255.0
the INTERIOR-NAT0 allowed host ip 10.138.34.16 access list 255.255.255.240 host 10.30.8.254
NAT (inside) 0-list of access to the INTERIOR-NAT0
Hope this helps
-Jouni
-
Traffic is failed on plain IPSec tunnel between two 892 s
Have a weird case and you are looking for some suggestions/thougs where to dig because I have exhausted the options.
Note: I replaced the Networkid real to a mentined below.
Topology: a classic IPSec VPN tunnel between two 892 s of Cisco, with pre-shared key and no GRE. A 892 (branch_892) has access to the Internet using PPPoE and has three network / VLAN behind it. A VLAN is coordinated to the PPPoE internet access. Access to the other two VLAN - VL92 (100.100.200.0/24) and VL93 (100.100.100.0/24) is performed via the VPN tunnel.
Second 892 (892_DC) has just one interface - WAN on Gigabit enabled/connected and a static route to the default GW. It doesn't have any defined interal network. If the router is strictly used to send traffic to VL92/VL93 to the domestic 892 via IPSec tunnel.
Here's the problem: access to VL93 (100.100.100.0/24) works, however for VL92 (100.100.100.0/24) - does not work.
Devices in VL92 I ping IP address of 892_DC through the VPN tunnel. The 892_DC router I can ping devices in VL92. However, I can't VL92 ping any device beyond the 892_DC and at the same time the packets arriving on 892_DC for VL92 are not sent through the VPN tunnel.
I took the package trace on 892_DC using capture point/buffer to nathalie caron to VL92 packages and saw that the traffic coming to the 892_DC. I run the nathalie caron even on Branch_892, and there was not a single package.
So... What's the problem? More interesting, I modified the way left on VL92 access list and still - no packets are sent through the tunnel.
Any idea? Two routers config are below
-------
892_DC #show ru
!
crypto ISAKMP policy 10
BA aes 256
hash sha256
preshared authentication
Group 2
isakmp encryption key * address 1.2.3.4
ISAKMP crypto keepalive 10 periodicals
!
address of 1.2.3.4 crypto isakmp peers
Description of-COIL-892
!
!
Crypto ipsec transform-set IT-IPSec-Transform-Set esp - aes 256 sha256-esp-hmac
Crypto ipsec df - bit clear
!
map IT ipsec - IPSec crypto - Crypto - map 10-isakmp
defined peer 1.2.3.4
disable the kilobytes of life together - the security association
86400 seconds, life of security association set
the transform-set IT-IPSec-Transform-Set value
match a lists 101
market arriere-route
QoS before filing
!
interface GigabitEthernet0
IP 10,20,30,40 255.255.255.240
IP 1400 MTU
IP tcp adjust-mss 1360
automatic duplex
automatic speed
card crypto IT-IPSec-Crypto-map
!
IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.20.30.41
!
access list 101 ip allow any 100.100.100.0 0.0.0.255 connect
access list 101 ip allow any 100.100.200.0 0.0.0.255 connect
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Branch_892 #sh run
!
crypto ISAKMP policy 10
BA aes 256
hash sha256
preshared authentication
Group 2
isakmp encryption key * address 10,20,30,40
ISAKMP crypto keepalive 10 periodicals
!
address peer isakmp crypto 10,20,30,40
!
!
Crypto ipsec transform-set IT-IPSec-Transform-Set esp - aes 256 sha256-esp-hmac
Crypto ipsec df - bit clear
!
map IT ipsec - IPSec crypto - Crypto - map 10-isakmp
defined peer 10,20,30,40
disable the kilobytes of life together - the security association
86400 seconds, life of security association set
the transform-set IT-IPSec-Transform-Set value
match address 101
market arriere-route
QoS before filing
!
FastEthernet6 interface
Description VL92
switchport access vlan 92
!
interface FastEthernet7
Description VL93
switchport access vlan 93
!
interface GigabitEthernet0
Description # to WAN #.
no ip address
automatic duplex
automatic speed
PPPoE-client dial-pool-number 1
!
interface Vlan1
Description # local to #.
IP 192.168.1.254 255.255.255.0
IP nat inside
IP virtual-reassembly in
!
interface Vlan92
Description fa6-nexus e100/0/40
IP 100.100.200.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Vlan93
Description fa7-nexus e100/0/38
IP 100.100.100.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Dialer0
no ip address
No cdp enable
!
interface Dialer1
IP 1.2.3.4 255.255.255.248
IP mtu 1454
NAT outside IP
IP virtual-reassembly in max-pumping 256
encapsulation ppp
IP tcp adjust-mss 1414
Dialer pool 1
Dialer-Group 1
Authentication callin PPP chap Protocol
PPP chap hostname ~ ~ ~
PPP chap password =.
No cdp enable
card crypto IT-IPSec-Crypto-map
!
Dialer-list 1 ip protocol allow
!
access-list 101 permit ip 100.100.100.0 0.0.0.255 any
access-list 101 permit ip 100.100.200.0 0.0.0.255 any
!
IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1
Yes correct sounds - so another possible problem is the routing is routing 100% correct on both sides? Can you put the two sides config for review?
-
RV180 VPN route all internet traffic via IPSec VPN
Hello
I install my RV180 to VPN to our headquarters Fortigate 60 C. It works really well
My only problem is that I don't know how to move internet traffic on our remote site by Headquarters. We want to use this technique so that all sites have the same web content filtering provided by our main Fortigate unit. I see clearly that all traffic destined to our internal network will go trough the VPN tunnel, but internet traffic will go through our modem at the remote site.
My way of fortigate thinking said that I need a static route to transfer all traffic through the VPN tunnel. I've read elsewhere that I need to set up some sort of ACL.
Anyone else has any ideas on this / has anyone successfully implemented somehting similar?
Hi Jared,
I don't think that RV180 takes complete care of tunneling. Complete tunneling allows you to all your traffic to VPN. RV180 made only split tunneling.
Thank you
Vijay
Sent by Cisco Support technique iPad App
-
How to troubleshoot an IPSec tunnel GRE?
Hello
My topology includes two firewalls connected through the Internet "" (router) and behind each firewall, there is a router.
The routers I configured a GRE tunnel that is successful, then I configured an IPsec tunnel on the firewall.
I does not change the mode to transport mode in the transform-set configuration.
Everything works; If I connect a PC to the router, it can ping another PC on the other router. However if I change mode of transport mode that they cannot.
I was wondering how can I ensure that the IPSec tunnel WILL really works? How can I fix it or package tracking?
Thank you.
I was wondering how can I ensure that the IPSec tunnel WILL really works? How can I fix it or package tracking?
To verify that the VPN tunnel works well, check the output of
ISAKMP crypto to show his
Crypto ipsec to show hisHere are the commands of debug
Debug condition crypto x.x.x.x, where x.x.x.x IP = peer peer
Debug crypto isakmp 200
Debug crypto ipsec 200You will see ACTIVE int the first output and program non-zero and decaps on the output of the latter.
For the GRE tunnel.
check the condition of the tunnel via "int ip see the brief.In addition, you can configure keepalive via the command:
Router # configure terminal
Router (config) #interface tunnel0
Router(Config-if) 5 4 #keepaliveand then run "debug keepalive tunnel" to see packets hello tunnel going and coming from the router.
Kind regards
Dinesh MoudgilPS Please rate helpful messages.
-
Multiple IPSec Tunnels, even peer
Hi all
I need to know if it's possible with Cisco technology to create several PKI IPsec tunnels with the same peer and the same subnet of destination in phase2.
Thank you
Brigitta
The server reports that, or the firewall?
If this is the firewall, make sure that you have a nat rule saying not NAT traffic firewall 'interesting' via the VPN.
-
RV180 and Cisco IPSec VPN client
Hi NetPro,
RV180 router supports VPN client using the regular Cisco VPN client connections?
Data sheet says it works with client QuickVPN. If the regular non-Quick client is not supported, both clients can coexist (= be installed simultaneously) on the same PC?
Is supported customer QuickVPN split tunneling?
Thank you!
Lubomir
Lubomir Hello,
The RV180 currently supports QuickVPN and PPTP VPN connections. It also has the IPSec tunnel as well, but it does not support the Cisco VPN client.
I saw a question have Cisco VPN and the QuickVPN installed on the same computer.
The QuickVPN client supports only split tunneling.
I hope that answers your questions.
-
I can weight of the IPSec Tunnels between ASAs
Hello
Remote site: link internet NYC 150 MB/s
Local site: link internet Baltimore 400 MB/s
Backup site: link internet Washington 200 Mb/s
My main site and my backup site are connected via a gigabit Ethernet circuit between the respective base site switches. Each site has its own internet connection and my OSPF allows to switch their traffic to the backup site if the main website is down. We are opening an office in New York with one ASA unique connected to 150 Mbps FIOS internet circuit. We want to set up an IPSec tunnel on the main site and the backup on the remote site, but want the remote site to prefer the tunnel in Baltimore, except if it is down.
Interesting traffic would be the same for the two tunnels
I know that ASA cannot be a GRE endpoint. How can I force the New York traffic through the tunnel in Baltimore as long as it works? An IPSec tunnel can be weighted?
Thank you
It is not in itself weighting, but you can create up to 10 backup over LAN to LAN VPN IPsec peers.
For each tunnel, the security apparatus tried to negotiate with the first peer in the list. If this peer does not respond, the security apparatus made his way to the bottom of the list until a peer responds, or there is no peer more in the list.
-
9.0 can a dynamic nat be used via ipsec vpn?
9.0 can a dynamic nat be used via ipsec vpn?
We have a vpn and work between asa and when we run traffic through a static nat rule traffic goes over the vpn. When we use a dynamic nat traffic does not get picked up by the ACL vpn.
We disable the nat rules to switch back and just so, even when we use the same destination to source the result is the same.
Am I missing something with 9.0 versions of code? If I disable all the nats and pass traffic it goes via the vpn.
So, it seems that when you use the dynamic nat statement, it pushes traffic to the external interface without looking at the acl of vpn. Please let me know if I'm crazy, I'm a newb on 8.3 zip code.
Thank you
Have you included in the ACL crytop natted ip address or range?
You allowed natted ip address or range to the other end of the tunnel?
-
1841 can route between tunnel GRE and IPSEC tunnel?
Hello everyone!
See the image below.
Main office (10.0.1.0/24 LAN) and branch (10.0.2.0/24 LAN) are connected through the GRE tunnel.
The third office (10.0.3.0/24) is attached to the second branch via IPSEC.
Is there the way to establish the connection between the third and the main office through cisco 1841?
Is it possible to perform routing, perhaps with NAT?
In fact we need connection with a single server in the main office.
Thank you
Hello
It is possible to build this configuration.
the IPSEC connection between 10.0.3.x and 10.0.2.x should also encapsulate the traffic to main office.
Steps to follow:
Central office, to shift traffic to 10.0.3.x above the GRE tunnel.
The second part, add the 10.0.3.x - 10.0.1.x selection of traffic to the ACL IPSEC with the third
The third part, add the 10.0.3.x - 10.0.1.x selection of traffic to the ACL IPSEC with the second pane.
Please rate if this helped.
Kind regards
Daniel
-
IPSec tunnel between 2 routers
Hello
I am trying to configure an IPSec VPN tunnel between 2 routers Cisco, connected to the internet via the ATM interface, my router is a 1841 with the network 10.200.36.0 address the remote router is a Cisco network 192.168.9.0 address with 877.
I have tryied to follow some tutorials, unsuccessfully, because I can't always ping all IP addresses on the remote network and also the VPN tunnel is not up!
Can help you please give me a configuration model, or maybe let me know how to configure step by step on mine and remote router?
Thank you very much!
Concerning
Riccardo
Here is an example. x.x.x.x and y.y.y.y are the public IPs of routers:
ROUTER1 hostname
!
crypto ISAKMP policy 10
BA aes 256
AUTH pre
Group 5
!
ISAKMP crypto key cisco1234 address y.y.y.y
!
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES256-SHA1 esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac
!
Profile of crypto ipsec TunnelProfile
the transform ESP-AES256-SHA1 value
!
interface Tunnel0
IP 10.255.255.0 255.255.255.254
tunnel Dialer source 0
tunnel destination y.y.y.y
ipv4 ipsec tunnel mode
Tunnel TunnelProfile ipsec protection profile
!
interface Dialer0
IP x.x.x.x
!
IP route 192.168.9.0 255.255.255.0 Tunnel0
hostname ROUTER2
!
crypto ISAKMP policy 10
BA aes 256
AUTH pre
Group 5
!
ISAKMP crypto cisco1234 key address x.x.x.x
!
Crypto ipsec ESP-AES256-SHA1 transform-set esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac
!
Profile of crypto ipsec TunnelProfile
the transform ESP-AES256-SHA1 value
!
interface Tunnel0
IP 10.255.255.1 255.255.255.254
tunnel Dialer source 0
tunnel destination x.x.x.x
ipv4 ipsec tunnel mode
Tunnel TunnelProfile ipsec protection profile
!
interface Dialer0
IP address y.y.y.y
!
IP route 10.200.36.0 255.255.255.0 Tunnel0
--
Don't stop once you have upgraded your network! Improve the world by lending money to low-income workers:
http://www.Kiva.org/invitedBy/karsteni -
ASA 8.6 - l2l IPsec tunnel established - not possible to ping
Hello world
I have a problem of configuration of the CISCO ASA 5512-x (IOS 8.6).
The IPsec tunnel is created between ASA and an another non-CISCO router (hereinafter "router"). I can send packets ping from router to ASA, but ASA is NOT able to meet these demands. Sending requests of ASA is also NOT possible.
I'm trying to interconnect with the network 192.168.2.0/24 (CISCO, interface DMZ) premises and 192.168.3.0/24 (router).
The CISCO ASA has a static public IP address. The router has a dynamic IP address, so I use the dynamic-map option...
Here is the output of "show run":
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASA 1.0000 Version 2
!
ciscoasa hostname
activate oBGOJTSctBcCGoTh encrypted password
2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted passwd
names of
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
nameif outside
security-level 0
address IP X.X.X.X 255.255.255.0
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
nameif inside
security-level 100
the IP 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
nameif DMZ
security-level 50
IP 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/3
Shutdown
No nameif
no level of security
no ip address
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/4
Shutdown
No nameif
no level of security
no ip address
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/5
Shutdown
No nameif
no level of security
no ip address
!
interface Management0/0
nameif management
security-level 100
IP 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
management only
!
passive FTP mode
internal subnet object-
192.168.0.0 subnet 255.255.255.0
object Web Server external network-ip
host Y.Y.Y.Y
Network Web server object
Home 192.168.2.100
network vpn-local object - 192.168.2.0
Subnet 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0
network vpn-remote object - 192.168.3.0
subnet 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0
outside_acl list extended access permit tcp any object Web server
outside_acl list extended access permit tcp any object webserver eq www
access-list l2l-extensive list allowed ip, vpn-local - 192.168.2.0 vpn-remote object - 192.168.3.0
dmz_acl access list extended icmp permitted an echo
pager lines 24
asdm of logging of information
Outside 1500 MTU
Within 1500 MTU
MTU 1500 DMZ
management of MTU 1500
ICMP unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
don't allow no asdm history
ARP timeout 14400
NAT (DMZ, outside) static static vpn-local destination - 192.168.2.0 vpn-local - 192.168.2.0, 192.168.3.0 - remote control-vpn vpn-remote control - 192.168.3.0
!
internal subnet object-
NAT dynamic interface (indoor, outdoor)
Network Web server object
NAT (DMZ, outside) Web-external-ip static tcp www www Server service
Access-Group global dmz_acl
Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Z.Z.Z.Z 1
Timeout xlate 03:00
Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
Sunrpc timeout 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 mgcp from 01:00 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00
Sip timeout 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 prompt Protocol sip-0: 03:00 sip - disconnect 0:02:00
Timeout sip-provisional-media 0:02:00 uauth 0:05:00 absolute
timeout tcp-proxy-reassembly 0:01:00
Floating conn timeout 0:00:00
dynamic-access-policy-registration DfltAccessPolicy
identity of the user by default-domain LOCAL
Enable http server
http 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 management
No snmp server location
No snmp Server contact
Server enable SNMP traps snmp authentication linkup, linkdown warmstart of cold start
IKEv1 crypto ipsec transform-set ikev1-trans-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
Crypto ipsec ikev2 proposal ipsec 3des-GNAT
Esp 3des encryption protocol
Esp integrity md5 Protocol
Crypto dynamic-map dynMidgeMap 1 match l2l-address list
Crypto dynamic-map dynMidgeMap 1 set pfs
Crypto dynamic-map dynMidgeMap 1 set ikev1 ikev1-trans-set transform-set
Crypto dynamic-map dynMidgeMap 1 set ikev2 ipsec-proposal 3des-GNAT
Crypto dynamic-map dynMidgeMap 1 life span of seconds set association security 28800
Crypto dynamic-map dynMidgeMap 1 the value reverse-road
midgeMap 1 card crypto ipsec-isakmp dynamic dynMidgeMap
midgeMap interface card crypto outside
ISAKMP crypto identity hostname
IKEv2 crypto policy 1
3des encryption
the md5 integrity
Group 2
FRP md5
second life 86400
Crypto ikev2 allow outside
Crypto ikev1 allow outside
IKEv1 crypto policy 1
preshared authentication
3des encryption
md5 hash
Group 2
life 86400
Telnet timeout 5
SSH timeout 5
Console timeout 0
management of 192.168.1.2 - dhcpd address 192.168.1.254
enable dhcpd management
!
a basic threat threat detection
Statistics-list of access threat detection
no statistical threat detection tcp-interception
WebVPN
internal midgeTrialPol group policy
attributes of the strategy of group midgeTrialPol
L2TP ipsec VPN-tunnel-Protocol ikev1, ikev2
enable IPSec-udp
tunnel-group midgeVpn type ipsec-l2l
tunnel-group midgeVpn General-attributes
Group Policy - by default-midgeTrialPol
midgeVpn group of tunnel ipsec-attributes
IKEv1 pre-shared-key *.
remote control-IKEv2 pre-shared-key authentication *.
pre-shared-key authentication local IKEv2 *.
!
class-map inspection_default
match default-inspection-traffic
!
!
type of policy-card inspect dns preset_dns_map
parameters
maximum message length automatic of customer
message-length maximum 512
Policy-map global_policy
class inspection_default
inspect the preset_dns_map dns
inspect the ftp
inspect h323 h225
inspect the h323 ras
inspect the rsh
inspect the rtsp
inspect esmtp
inspect sqlnet
inspect the skinny
inspect sunrpc
inspect xdmcp
inspect the sip
inspect the netbios
inspect the tftp
Review the ip options
!
global service-policy global_policy
context of prompt hostname
no remote anonymous reporting call
Cryptochecksum:fa02572f9ff8add7bbfe622a4801e606
: end
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
X.X.X.X - ASA public IP
Y.Y.Y.Y - a web server
Z.Z.Z.Z - default gateway
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASA PING:
ciscoasa # ping DMZ 192.168.3.1
Type to abort escape sequence.
Send 5, echoes ICMP 100 bytes to 192.168.3.1, time-out is 2 seconds:
?????
Success rate is 0% (0/5)
PING from router (debug on CISCO):
NAT ciscoasa #: untranslation - outside:192.168.2.1/0 to DMZ:192.168.2.1/0
NAT: untranslation - outside:192.168.2.1/0 to DMZ:192.168.2.1/0
NAT: untranslation - outside:192.168.2.1/0 to DMZ:192.168.2.1/0
Outside ICMP echo request: 192.168.3.1 DMZ:192.168.2.1 ID = 3859 seq = 0 len = 40
Outside ICMP echo request: 192.168.3.1 DMZ:192.168.2.1 ID = 3859 seq = 1 len = 40
Outside ICMP echo request: 192.168.3.1 DMZ:192.168.2.1 ID = 3859 seq = 2 len = 40
Outside ICMP echo request: 192.168.3.1 DMZ:192.168.2.1 ID = 3859 seq = len 3 = 40
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ciscoasa # show the road outside
Code: C - connected, S - static, RIP, M - mobile - IGRP, R - I, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, OSPF, IA - external EIGRP, O - EX - OSPF inter zone
N1 - type external OSPF NSSA 1, N2 - type external OSPF NSSA 2
E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - external OSPF of type 2, E - EGP
i - IS - L1 - IS - IS level 1, L2 - IS - IS IS level 2, AI - IS inter zone
* - candidate by default, U - static route by user, o - ODR
P periodical downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is Z.Z.Z.Z to network 0.0.0.0
C Z.Z.Z.0 255.255.255.0 is directly connected to the outside of the
S 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 [1/0] via Z.Z.Z.Z, outdoors
S * 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 [1/0] via Z.Z.Z.Z, outdoors
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you have an idea that I am wrong? Probably some bad NAT/ACL I suppose, but I could always find something only for 8.4 iOS and not 8.6... Perhaps and no doubt I already missed the configuration with the unwanted controls, but I've tried various things...
Please, if you have an idea, let me know! Thank you very much!
Hello
I've never used "global" option in ACL, but it looks to be the origin of the problem. Cisco doc.
"The global access rules are defined as a special ACL that is processed for each interface on the device for incoming traffic in the interface. Thus, although the ACL is configured once on the device, it acts as an ACL defined for Management In secondary interface-specific. (Global rules are always in the direction of In, never Out Management). "
You ACL: access-list extended dmz_acl to any any icmp echo
For example, when you launch the ASA, there is an echo response from the router on the external interface--> global can block.
Then to initiate router, the ASA Launches echo-reply being blocked again.
Try to add permit-response to echo as well.
In addition, you can use both "inspect icmp" in world politics than the ACL.
If none does not work, you can run another t-shoot with control packet - trace on SAA.
THX
MS
-
IPSec tunnels between duplicate LAN subnets
Hi all
Please help to connect three sites with our Central site has all the resources for users, including internet access.
The three sites will be the ASA 5505 like their WAN device.
We need to know is - it possible, allowing to configure an IPsec Tunnel between the three ASA with duplicate LAN subnets.
Central site two networks 192.168.1.x 24, 192.168.100.x 24
Distance a 24 192.168.1.x subnet
Two remote a subnet 192.168.100.x 24
If it is possible we also do hair distance one ping, above two remote to the Central Site to access internet, what sites need are on the Central Site, including e-mail, network, other resource also records.
We have no other way to make this network, as all security is on our Central Site, website filtering, Application filtering, filtering of network traffic all.
We understand that we can change two remote sites to a different subnet from the Central Site, but we have so many host devices, it will take weeks or months, so to change the MS AD domain for all users, servers too.
We really need your expertise to do this in a laboratory and then in production.
Thank you
Hello Stephen,
You can check the following links for the subnets overlap talk to each other:-
1 LAN-to-LAN IPsec VPN with overlapping networks
http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a0080b37d0b.shtml
2 IPsec between two IOS routers with overlapping of private networks
http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps5855/products_configuration_example09186a0080a0ece4.shtml
Important point is local network must connect to the remote network via the translated addresses.
for example, you won't be ablt to use real IP of the communication.
For haripinning or turning U:
http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00805734ae.shtml
Hope that helps.
Kind regards
Dinesh Moudgil
Maybe you are looking for
-
ProBook 440 G2: Windows not opening
my windows is not opening. I have two win8.1 pro and ubuntu OS. first of all there is a white screen, then after a while, that a screen indicating "PREPARATION AUTO REPAIR. and after a while that a blue screen appears on display, try again and all th
-
Hello I installed windows 8.1 (64-bit) on my laptop dv5z-1000 and I can not find working drivers for my webcam can you please help or suggest a 'solution' to get my webcam working again? Thank you
-
Problem with the Lenovo A536 applications update.
Hello, recently applications can not stretch. Can not update of applications like Facebook, Twitter, etc. I'm sorry for the bad English, use translate.google.com. Thanks in advance for your time.
-
I need a printer duplex function your advertising is not clear analysis - recommendations?
I need a printer duplex function your advertising is not clear analysis - recommendations?
-
I reinstalled my Vista OS and now am wondering if I should upgrade to Service Pack 2
I had problems to reboot, and I had to do a whole reinstall to my Vista operating system factory settings. I installed all the updates except SP2. When I had before Service Pack 2, (1) my printer had recurring problems. He'd stop work again and again