RV180 dhcp via IPSEC Tunnel

Hello

I have set up an ipsec tunnel between rv180 (site A) and asa5520 (site B) successful. The dhcp server to clients is on the B site. The dhcp clients request going through the tunnel, they leave the rv180 on the wan interface and arrive at site B with the wan-ipaddress from site A. The configured dhcp-relay on the website match the remote network (site B), configured in the on site A ipsec tunnel. Is there anyway that all traffic pass through the ipsec tunnel? We want it for security reasons.

Any help is greatly appreciated.

Ralf

Dear Ralf,

Thank you to reach small business support community.

Unfortunately the relay DHCP Relay not of DHCP request to the IPSec VPN tunnel.  I hope that this answer to your question and do not hesitate to contact me if there is any additional help with what I can help you.

Kind regards

Jeffrey Rodriguez S... : | :. : | :.
Support Engineer Cisco client

* Please rate the Post so other will know when an answer has been found.

Tags: Cisco Support

Similar Questions

  • Send from FW traffic via IPSec tunnel

    Hello

    I have a FW in site B that needs to authenticate VPN users that connect to the FW in site B to an RSA RADIUS server to site A. So, this means that the FW would send traffic RADUIS via its peer interface to site A. At least that is how the RADIUS server in site A see traffic. The RADIUS server will see it as coming from au pair from right side of site B's IP address?

    The public (peer) IP of the interface does not part of interesting traffic, and I wonder if it might bite me in the a$ $.

    Does this make any sense?

    Thank you!

    Perhaps add it but make an exclusion of Protocol in the interesting traffic.

    That is to say excluding isakmp and esp traffic.

    I'm not sure if it will work, but its worth a try

  • Cisco recommended for the GRE VIA IPSEC router.

    Hello world

    I intend to connect our two remote locations via IPSEC tunnel, looking for the cheapest option available for the router options.

    Do you have any good recommendations?

    Have a nice weekend!!

    Very appreciated

    Hello

    There is 1 that I love so much, it's 892fsp of Cisco.

    It has 8-port switch, you can make l2tp vpn, free will, love, ips, zbf...

    I hope this helps.

    Thank you

    PS: Please do not forget to rate and score as correct answer if this answered your question

  • Cannot reach the destination of an IPSec tunnel through another IPSec tunnel

    Hi all

    I have a PIX 515E version 8.0 (2).

    I have two remote sites connected to this PIX via IPSec tunnels.

    Each remote site can reach local networks behind the PIX, but I can't reach remoteSiteB remoteSiteA.

    Thus,.

    SiteA <----- ipsec="" -----="">PIX1 SiteX <---------------->10.0.8.1 10.30.8.254

    SiteB <----- ipsec="" -----="">PIX1 SiteX <---------------->10.0.8.1 10.138.34.21

    SiteA can ping SiteX

    SiteB can ping SiteX

    SiteA cannot ping SiteB

    SiteB cannot ping SiteA

    If I do not show crypto isakmp ipsec his I see appropriate subnets:

    Tag crypto map: CRYPTO-MAP, seq num: 4, local addr: 203.166.1.1

    permit access-list ACLVPN-TO_SITEA ip 10.138.34.16 255.255.255.240 host 10.30.8.254

    local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (10.138.34.16/255.255.255.240/0/0)

    Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (10.30.8.254/255.255.255.255/0/0)

    current_peer: 104.86.2.4

    Tag crypto map: CRYPTO-MAP, seq num: 5, local addr: 203.166.1.1

    access-list ACLVPN-TO_SITEB allowed host ip 10.30.8.254 10.138.34.16 255.255.255.240

    local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (10.30.8.254/255.255.255.255/0/0)

    Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (10.138.34.16/255.255.255.240/0/0)

    current_peer: 216.178.200.200

    Journal messages that seem to point to the problem...

    April 18, 2013 13:27:35: % PIX-4-402116: IPSEC: received a package of ESP (SPI = 0xD51BB13A, sequence number = 0x21A) 104.86.2.4 (user = 104.86.2.4) at 203.166.1.1.  Inside the package décapsulés does not match policy negotiated in the SA.  The package indicates its destination as 10.138.34.21, its source as 10.30.8.254 and its Protocol 6.  SA specifies its local proxy like 10.0.8.0/255.255.255.0/0/0 and his remote_proxy as 10.30.8.254/255.255.255.255/0/0

    My question is really what I have to do something funky to allow traffic to pass between the two tunnels?

    Hello

    This could be much easier if we have seen the real configurations.

    But here are some things to be confirmed in the configurations (some of them you mentioned above, but I still quote once again)

    • Make sure that each firewall, you set the appropriate VPN L2L ACL
    • Make sure that you have configured NAT0 on the central PIX "outside" interface for the Site A and Site B
    • Make sure the Central PIX has "same-security-traffic permit intra-interface" configured. This will allow the Site traffic to enter the Central PIX 'outside' interface and head back on the same interface to Site B. And vice versa.

    To view some actual configurations that may be required provided everything else is ok. (I assume that all devices are Cisco)

    Central PIX

    permit same-security-traffic intra-interface

    A connection to the site

    SITE-A-CRYPTOMAP of the 10.0.8.0 ip access list allow 255.255.255.0 host 10.30.8.254

    SITE-A-CRYPTOMAP of the 10.138.34.16 ip access list allow 255.255.255.240 host 10.30.8.254

    Site B connection

    SITE-B-CRYPTOMAP of the 10.0.8.0 ip access list allow 255.255.255.0 10.138.34.16 255.255.255.240

    SITE-B-CRYPTOMAP to the list of allowed access host ip 10.30.8.254 10.138.34.16 255.255.255.240

    NAT0

    access list for the INTERIOR-NAT0 allowed ip 10.0.8.0 255.255.255.0 host 10.30.8.254

    access list for the INTERIOR-NAT0 allowed ip 10.0.8.0 255.255.255.0 10.138.34.16 255.255.255.240

    NAT (inside) 0-list of access to the INTERIOR-NAT0

    OUTSIDE-NAT0 allowed host ip 10.30.8.254 access list 10.138.34.16 255.255.255.240

    OUTSIDE-NAT0 allowed ip 10.138.34.16 access list 255.255.255.240 host 10.30.8.254

    NAT (outside) 0-list of access OUTSIDE-NAT0

    Site has

    CENTRAL-SITE-CRYPTOMAP to the list of allowed access host ip 10.30.8.254 10.0.8.0 255.255.255.0

    CENTRAL-SITE-CRYPTOMAP to the list of allowed access host ip 10.30.8.254 10.138.34.16 255.255.255.240

    the INTERIOR-NAT0 allowed host ip 10.30.8.254 access list 10.0.8.0 255.255.255.0

    the INTERIOR-NAT0 allowed host ip 10.30.8.254 access list 10.138.34.16 255.255.255.240

    NAT (inside) 0-list of access to the INTERIOR-NAT0

    Site B

    CENTRAL-SITE-CRYPTOMAP of the 10.138.34.16 ip access list allow 255.255.255.240 10.0.8.0 255.255.255.0

    CENTRAL-SITE-CRYPTOMAP of the 10.138.34.16 ip access list allow 255.255.255.240 host 10.30.8.254

    the INTERIOR-NAT0 allowed host ip 10.138.34.16 access list 255.255.255.240 10.0.8.0 255.255.255.0

    the INTERIOR-NAT0 allowed host ip 10.138.34.16 access list 255.255.255.240 host 10.30.8.254

    NAT (inside) 0-list of access to the INTERIOR-NAT0

    Hope this helps

    -Jouni

  • Traffic is failed on plain IPSec tunnel between two 892 s

    Have a weird case and you are looking for some suggestions/thougs where to dig because I have exhausted the options.

    Note: I replaced the Networkid real to a mentined below.

    Topology: a classic IPSec VPN tunnel between two 892 s of Cisco, with pre-shared key and no GRE. A 892 (branch_892) has access to the Internet using PPPoE and has three network / VLAN behind it. A VLAN is coordinated to the PPPoE internet access. Access to the other two VLAN - VL92 (100.100.200.0/24) and VL93 (100.100.100.0/24) is performed via the VPN tunnel.

    Second 892 (892_DC) has just one interface - WAN on Gigabit enabled/connected and a static route to the default GW. It doesn't have any defined interal network. If the router is strictly used to send traffic to VL92/VL93 to the domestic 892 via IPSec tunnel.

    Here's the problem: access to VL93 (100.100.100.0/24) works, however for VL92 (100.100.100.0/24) - does not work.

    Devices in VL92 I ping IP address of 892_DC through the VPN tunnel. The 892_DC router I can ping devices in VL92. However, I can't VL92 ping any device beyond the 892_DC and at the same time the packets arriving on 892_DC for VL92 are not sent through the VPN tunnel.

    I took the package trace on 892_DC using capture point/buffer to nathalie caron to VL92 packages and saw that the traffic coming to the 892_DC. I run the nathalie caron even on Branch_892, and there was not a single package.

    So... What's the problem? More interesting, I modified the way left on VL92 access list and still - no packets are sent through the tunnel.

    Any idea? Two routers config are below

    -------

    892_DC #show ru

    !

    crypto ISAKMP policy 10

    BA aes 256

    hash sha256

    preshared authentication

    Group 2

    isakmp encryption key * address 1.2.3.4

    ISAKMP crypto keepalive 10 periodicals

    !

    address of 1.2.3.4 crypto isakmp peers

    Description of-COIL-892

    !

    !

    Crypto ipsec transform-set IT-IPSec-Transform-Set esp - aes 256 sha256-esp-hmac

    Crypto ipsec df - bit clear

    !

    map IT ipsec - IPSec crypto - Crypto - map 10-isakmp

    defined peer 1.2.3.4

    disable the kilobytes of life together - the security association

    86400 seconds, life of security association set

    the transform-set IT-IPSec-Transform-Set value

    match a lists 101

    market arriere-route

    QoS before filing

    !

    interface GigabitEthernet0

    IP 10,20,30,40 255.255.255.240

    IP 1400 MTU

    IP tcp adjust-mss 1360

    automatic duplex

    automatic speed

    card crypto IT-IPSec-Crypto-map

    !

    IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.20.30.41

    !

    access list 101 ip allow any 100.100.100.0 0.0.0.255 connect

    access list 101 ip allow any 100.100.200.0 0.0.0.255 connect

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Branch_892 #sh run

    !

    crypto ISAKMP policy 10

    BA aes 256

    hash sha256

    preshared authentication

    Group 2

    isakmp encryption key * address 10,20,30,40

    ISAKMP crypto keepalive 10 periodicals

    !

    address peer isakmp crypto 10,20,30,40

    !

    !

    Crypto ipsec transform-set IT-IPSec-Transform-Set esp - aes 256 sha256-esp-hmac

    Crypto ipsec df - bit clear

    !

    map IT ipsec - IPSec crypto - Crypto - map 10-isakmp

    defined peer 10,20,30,40

    disable the kilobytes of life together - the security association

    86400 seconds, life of security association set

    the transform-set IT-IPSec-Transform-Set value

    match address 101

    market arriere-route

    QoS before filing

    !

    FastEthernet6 interface

    Description VL92

    switchport access vlan 92

    !

    interface FastEthernet7

    Description VL93

    switchport access vlan 93

    !

    interface GigabitEthernet0

    Description # to WAN #.

    no ip address

    automatic duplex

    automatic speed

    PPPoE-client dial-pool-number 1

    !

    interface Vlan1

    Description # local to #.

    IP 192.168.1.254 255.255.255.0

    IP nat inside

    IP virtual-reassembly in

    !

    interface Vlan92

    Description fa6-nexus e100/0/40

    IP 100.100.200.1 255.255.255.0

    !

    interface Vlan93

    Description fa7-nexus e100/0/38

    IP 100.100.100.1 255.255.255.0

    !

    interface Dialer0

    no ip address

    No cdp enable

    !

    interface Dialer1

    IP 1.2.3.4 255.255.255.248

    IP mtu 1454

    NAT outside IP

    IP virtual-reassembly in max-pumping 256

    encapsulation ppp

    IP tcp adjust-mss 1414

    Dialer pool 1

    Dialer-Group 1

    Authentication callin PPP chap Protocol

    PPP chap hostname ~ ~ ~

    PPP chap password =.

    No cdp enable

    card crypto IT-IPSec-Crypto-map

    !

    Dialer-list 1 ip protocol allow

    !

    access-list 101 permit ip 100.100.100.0 0.0.0.255 any

    access-list 101 permit ip 100.100.200.0 0.0.0.255 any

    !

    IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1

    Yes correct sounds - so another possible problem is the routing is routing 100% correct on both sides? Can you put the two sides config for review?

  • RV180 VPN route all internet traffic via IPSec VPN

    Hello

    I install my RV180 to VPN to our headquarters Fortigate 60 C. It works really well

    My only problem is that I don't know how to move internet traffic on our remote site by Headquarters. We want to use this technique so that all sites have the same web content filtering provided by our main Fortigate unit. I see clearly that all traffic destined to our internal network will go trough the VPN tunnel, but internet traffic will go through our modem at the remote site.

    My way of fortigate thinking said that I need a static route to transfer all traffic through the VPN tunnel. I've read elsewhere that I need to set up some sort of ACL.

    Anyone else has any ideas on this / has anyone successfully implemented somehting similar?

    Hi Jared,

    I don't think that RV180 takes complete care of tunneling. Complete tunneling allows you to all your traffic to VPN. RV180 made only split tunneling.

    Thank you

    Vijay

    Sent by Cisco Support technique iPad App

  • How to troubleshoot an IPSec tunnel GRE?

    Hello

    My topology includes two firewalls connected through the Internet "" (router) and behind each firewall, there is a router.

    The routers I configured a GRE tunnel that is successful, then I configured an IPsec tunnel on the firewall.

    I does not change the mode to transport mode in the transform-set configuration.

    Everything works; If I connect a PC to the router, it can ping another PC on the other router. However if I change mode of transport mode that they cannot.

    I was wondering how can I ensure that the IPSec tunnel WILL really works? How can I fix it or package tracking?

    Thank you.

    I was wondering how can I ensure that the IPSec tunnel WILL really works? How can I fix it or package tracking?

    To verify that the VPN tunnel works well, check the output of
    ISAKMP crypto to show his
    Crypto ipsec to show his

    Here are the commands of debug
    Debug condition crypto x.x.x.x, where x.x.x.x IP = peer peer
    Debug crypto isakmp 200
    Debug crypto ipsec 200

    You will see ACTIVE int the first output and program non-zero and decaps on the output of the latter.

    For the GRE tunnel.
    check the condition of the tunnel via "int ip see the brief.

    In addition, you can configure keepalive via the command:

    Router # configure terminal
    Router (config) #interface tunnel0
    Router(Config-if) 5 4 #keepalive

    and then run "debug keepalive tunnel" to see packets hello tunnel going and coming from the router.

    Kind regards
    Dinesh Moudgil

    PS Please rate helpful messages.

  • Multiple IPSec Tunnels, even peer

    Hi all

    I need to know if it's possible with Cisco technology to create several PKI IPsec tunnels with the same peer and the same subnet of destination in phase2.

    Thank you

    Brigitta

    The server reports that, or the firewall?

    If this is the firewall, make sure that you have a nat rule saying not NAT traffic firewall 'interesting' via the VPN.

  • RV180 and Cisco IPSec VPN client

    Hi NetPro,

    RV180 router supports VPN client using the regular Cisco VPN client connections?

    Data sheet says it works with client QuickVPN. If the regular non-Quick client is not supported, both clients can coexist (= be installed simultaneously) on the same PC?

    Is supported customer QuickVPN split tunneling?

    Thank you!

    Lubomir

    Lubomir Hello,

    The RV180 currently supports QuickVPN and PPTP VPN connections. It also has the IPSec tunnel as well, but it does not support the Cisco VPN client.

    I saw a question have Cisco VPN and the QuickVPN installed on the same computer.

    The QuickVPN client supports only split tunneling.

    I hope that answers your questions.

  • I can weight of the IPSec Tunnels between ASAs

    Hello

    Remote site: link internet NYC 150 MB/s

    Local site: link internet Baltimore 400 MB/s

    Backup site: link internet Washington 200 Mb/s

    My main site and my backup site are connected via a gigabit Ethernet circuit between the respective base site switches.  Each site has its own internet connection and my OSPF allows to switch their traffic to the backup site if the main website is down.  We are opening an office in New York with one ASA unique connected to 150 Mbps FIOS internet circuit.  We want to set up an IPSec tunnel on the main site and the backup on the remote site, but want the remote site to prefer the tunnel in Baltimore, except if it is down.

    Interesting traffic would be the same for the two tunnels

    I know that ASA cannot be a GRE endpoint.  How can I force the New York traffic through the tunnel in Baltimore as long as it works?  An IPSec tunnel can be weighted?

    Thank you

    It is not in itself weighting, but you can create up to 10 backup over LAN to LAN VPN IPsec peers.

    For each tunnel, the security apparatus tried to negotiate with the first peer in the list. If this peer does not respond, the security apparatus made his way to the bottom of the list until a peer responds, or there is no peer more in the list.

    Reference.

  • 9.0 can a dynamic nat be used via ipsec vpn?

    9.0 can a dynamic nat be used via ipsec vpn?

    We have a vpn and work between asa and when we run traffic through a static nat rule traffic goes over the vpn. When we use a dynamic nat traffic does not get picked up by the ACL vpn.

    We disable the nat rules to switch back and just so, even when we use the same destination to source the result is the same.

    Am I missing something with 9.0 versions of code? If I disable all the nats and pass traffic it goes via the vpn.

    So, it seems that when you use the dynamic nat statement, it pushes traffic to the external interface without looking at the acl of vpn. Please let me know if I'm crazy, I'm a newb on 8.3 zip code.

    Thank you

    Have you included in the ACL crytop natted ip address or range?

    You allowed natted ip address or range to the other end of the tunnel?

  • 1841 can route between tunnel GRE and IPSEC tunnel?

    Hello everyone!

    See the image below.

    Main office (10.0.1.0/24 LAN) and branch (10.0.2.0/24 LAN) are connected through the GRE tunnel.

    The third office (10.0.3.0/24) is attached to the second branch via IPSEC.

    Is there the way to establish the connection between the third and the main office through cisco 1841?

    Is it possible to perform routing, perhaps with NAT?

    In fact we need connection with a single server in the main office.

    Thank you

    Hello

    It is possible to build this configuration.

    the IPSEC connection between 10.0.3.x and 10.0.2.x should also encapsulate the traffic to main office.

    Steps to follow:

    Central office, to shift traffic to 10.0.3.x above the GRE tunnel.

    The second part, add the 10.0.3.x - 10.0.1.x selection of traffic to the ACL IPSEC with the third

    The third part, add the 10.0.3.x - 10.0.1.x selection of traffic to the ACL IPSEC with the second pane.

    Please rate if this helped.

    Kind regards

    Daniel

  • IPSec tunnel between 2 routers

    Hello

    I am trying to configure an IPSec VPN tunnel between 2 routers Cisco, connected to the internet via the ATM interface, my router is a 1841 with the network 10.200.36.0 address the remote router is a Cisco network 192.168.9.0 address with 877.

    I have tryied to follow some tutorials, unsuccessfully, because I can't always ping all IP addresses on the remote network and also the VPN tunnel is not up!

    Can help you please give me a configuration model, or maybe let me know how to configure step by step on mine and remote router?

    Thank you very much!

    Concerning

    Riccardo

    Here is an example. x.x.x.x and y.y.y.y are the public IPs of routers:

    ROUTER1 hostname

    !

    crypto ISAKMP policy 10

    BA aes 256

    AUTH pre

    Group 5

    !

    ISAKMP crypto key cisco1234 address y.y.y.y

    !

    Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES256-SHA1 esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac

    !

    Profile of crypto ipsec TunnelProfile

    the transform ESP-AES256-SHA1 value

    !

    interface Tunnel0

    IP 10.255.255.0 255.255.255.254

    tunnel Dialer source 0

    tunnel destination y.y.y.y

    ipv4 ipsec tunnel mode

    Tunnel TunnelProfile ipsec protection profile

    !

    interface Dialer0

    IP x.x.x.x

    !

    IP route 192.168.9.0 255.255.255.0 Tunnel0

    hostname ROUTER2

    !

    crypto ISAKMP policy 10

    BA aes 256

    AUTH pre

    Group 5

    !

    ISAKMP crypto cisco1234 key address x.x.x.x

    !

    Crypto ipsec ESP-AES256-SHA1 transform-set esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac

    !

    Profile of crypto ipsec TunnelProfile

    the transform ESP-AES256-SHA1 value

    !

    interface Tunnel0

    IP 10.255.255.1 255.255.255.254

    tunnel Dialer source 0

    tunnel destination x.x.x.x

    ipv4 ipsec tunnel mode

    Tunnel TunnelProfile ipsec protection profile

    !

    interface Dialer0

    IP address y.y.y.y

    !

    IP route 10.200.36.0 255.255.255.0 Tunnel0

    --
    Don't stop once you have upgraded your network! Improve the world by lending money to low-income workers:
    http://www.Kiva.org/invitedBy/karsteni

  • ASA 8.6 - l2l IPsec tunnel established - not possible to ping

    Hello world

    I have a problem of configuration of the CISCO ASA 5512-x (IOS 8.6).

    The IPsec tunnel is created between ASA and an another non-CISCO router (hereinafter "router"). I can send packets ping from router to ASA, but ASA is NOT able to meet these demands. Sending requests of ASA is also NOT possible.

    I'm trying to interconnect with the network 192.168.2.0/24 (CISCO, interface DMZ) premises and 192.168.3.0/24 (router).

    The CISCO ASA has a static public IP address. The router has a dynamic IP address, so I use the dynamic-map option...

    Here is the output of "show run":

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ASA 1.0000 Version 2

    !

    ciscoasa hostname

    activate oBGOJTSctBcCGoTh encrypted password

    2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted passwd

    names of

    !

    interface GigabitEthernet0/0

    nameif outside

    security-level 0

    address IP X.X.X.X 255.255.255.0

    !

    interface GigabitEthernet0/1

    nameif inside

    security-level 100

    the IP 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0

    !

    interface GigabitEthernet0/2

    nameif DMZ

    security-level 50

    IP 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0

    !

    interface GigabitEthernet0/3

    Shutdown

    No nameif

    no level of security

    no ip address

    !

    interface GigabitEthernet0/4

    Shutdown

    No nameif

    no level of security

    no ip address

    !

    interface GigabitEthernet0/5

    Shutdown

    No nameif

    no level of security

    no ip address

    !

    interface Management0/0

    nameif management

    security-level 100

    IP 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0

    management only

    !

    passive FTP mode

    internal subnet object-

    192.168.0.0 subnet 255.255.255.0

    object Web Server external network-ip

    host Y.Y.Y.Y

    Network Web server object

    Home 192.168.2.100

    network vpn-local object - 192.168.2.0

    Subnet 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0

    network vpn-remote object - 192.168.3.0

    subnet 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0

    outside_acl list extended access permit tcp any object Web server

    outside_acl list extended access permit tcp any object webserver eq www

    access-list l2l-extensive list allowed ip, vpn-local - 192.168.2.0 vpn-remote object - 192.168.3.0

    dmz_acl access list extended icmp permitted an echo

    pager lines 24

    asdm of logging of information

    Outside 1500 MTU

    Within 1500 MTU

    MTU 1500 DMZ

    management of MTU 1500

    ICMP unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1

    don't allow no asdm history

    ARP timeout 14400

    NAT (DMZ, outside) static static vpn-local destination - 192.168.2.0 vpn-local - 192.168.2.0, 192.168.3.0 - remote control-vpn vpn-remote control - 192.168.3.0

    !

    internal subnet object-

    NAT dynamic interface (indoor, outdoor)

    Network Web server object

    NAT (DMZ, outside) Web-external-ip static tcp www www Server service

    Access-Group global dmz_acl

    Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Z.Z.Z.Z 1

    Timeout xlate 03:00

    Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02

    Sunrpc timeout 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 mgcp from 01:00 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00

    Sip timeout 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 prompt Protocol sip-0: 03:00 sip - disconnect 0:02:00

    Timeout sip-provisional-media 0:02:00 uauth 0:05:00 absolute

    timeout tcp-proxy-reassembly 0:01:00

    Floating conn timeout 0:00:00

    dynamic-access-policy-registration DfltAccessPolicy

    identity of the user by default-domain LOCAL

    Enable http server

    http 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 management

    No snmp server location

    No snmp Server contact

    Server enable SNMP traps snmp authentication linkup, linkdown warmstart of cold start

    IKEv1 crypto ipsec transform-set ikev1-trans-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac

    Crypto ipsec ikev2 proposal ipsec 3des-GNAT

    Esp 3des encryption protocol

    Esp integrity md5 Protocol

    Crypto dynamic-map dynMidgeMap 1 match l2l-address list

    Crypto dynamic-map dynMidgeMap 1 set pfs

    Crypto dynamic-map dynMidgeMap 1 set ikev1 ikev1-trans-set transform-set

    Crypto dynamic-map dynMidgeMap 1 set ikev2 ipsec-proposal 3des-GNAT

    Crypto dynamic-map dynMidgeMap 1 life span of seconds set association security 28800

    Crypto dynamic-map dynMidgeMap 1 the value reverse-road

    midgeMap 1 card crypto ipsec-isakmp dynamic dynMidgeMap

    midgeMap interface card crypto outside

    ISAKMP crypto identity hostname

    IKEv2 crypto policy 1

    3des encryption

    the md5 integrity

    Group 2

    FRP md5

    second life 86400

    Crypto ikev2 allow outside

    Crypto ikev1 allow outside

    IKEv1 crypto policy 1

    preshared authentication

    3des encryption

    md5 hash

    Group 2

    life 86400

    Telnet timeout 5

    SSH timeout 5

    Console timeout 0

    management of 192.168.1.2 - dhcpd address 192.168.1.254

    enable dhcpd management

    !

    a basic threat threat detection

    Statistics-list of access threat detection

    no statistical threat detection tcp-interception

    WebVPN

    internal midgeTrialPol group policy

    attributes of the strategy of group midgeTrialPol

    L2TP ipsec VPN-tunnel-Protocol ikev1, ikev2

    enable IPSec-udp

    tunnel-group midgeVpn type ipsec-l2l

    tunnel-group midgeVpn General-attributes

    Group Policy - by default-midgeTrialPol

    midgeVpn group of tunnel ipsec-attributes

    IKEv1 pre-shared-key *.

    remote control-IKEv2 pre-shared-key authentication *.

    pre-shared-key authentication local IKEv2 *.

    !

    class-map inspection_default

    match default-inspection-traffic

    !

    !

    type of policy-card inspect dns preset_dns_map

    parameters

    maximum message length automatic of customer

    message-length maximum 512

    Policy-map global_policy

    class inspection_default

    inspect the preset_dns_map dns

    inspect the ftp

    inspect h323 h225

    inspect the h323 ras

    inspect the rsh

    inspect the rtsp

    inspect esmtp

    inspect sqlnet

    inspect the skinny

    inspect sunrpc

    inspect xdmcp

    inspect the sip

    inspect the netbios

    inspect the tftp

    Review the ip options

    !

    global service-policy global_policy

    context of prompt hostname

    no remote anonymous reporting call

    Cryptochecksum:fa02572f9ff8add7bbfe622a4801e606

    : end

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    X.X.X.X - ASA public IP

    Y.Y.Y.Y - a web server

    Z.Z.Z.Z - default gateway

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ASA PING:

    ciscoasa # ping DMZ 192.168.3.1

    Type to abort escape sequence.

    Send 5, echoes ICMP 100 bytes to 192.168.3.1, time-out is 2 seconds:

    ?????

    Success rate is 0% (0/5)

    PING from router (debug on CISCO):

    NAT ciscoasa #: untranslation - outside:192.168.2.1/0 to DMZ:192.168.2.1/0

    NAT: untranslation - outside:192.168.2.1/0 to DMZ:192.168.2.1/0

    NAT: untranslation - outside:192.168.2.1/0 to DMZ:192.168.2.1/0

    Outside ICMP echo request: 192.168.3.1 DMZ:192.168.2.1 ID = 3859 seq = 0 len = 40

    Outside ICMP echo request: 192.168.3.1 DMZ:192.168.2.1 ID = 3859 seq = 1 len = 40

    Outside ICMP echo request: 192.168.3.1 DMZ:192.168.2.1 ID = 3859 seq = 2 len = 40

    Outside ICMP echo request: 192.168.3.1 DMZ:192.168.2.1 ID = 3859 seq = len 3 = 40

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ciscoasa # show the road outside

    Code: C - connected, S - static, RIP, M - mobile - IGRP, R - I, B - BGP

    D - EIGRP, OSPF, IA - external EIGRP, O - EX - OSPF inter zone

    N1 - type external OSPF NSSA 1, N2 - type external OSPF NSSA 2

    E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - external OSPF of type 2, E - EGP

    i - IS - L1 - IS - IS level 1, L2 - IS - IS IS level 2, AI - IS inter zone

    * - candidate by default, U - static route by user, o - ODR

    P periodical downloaded static route

    Gateway of last resort is Z.Z.Z.Z to network 0.0.0.0

    C Z.Z.Z.0 255.255.255.0 is directly connected to the outside of the

    S 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 [1/0] via Z.Z.Z.Z, outdoors

    S * 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 [1/0] via Z.Z.Z.Z, outdoors

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Do you have an idea that I am wrong? Probably some bad NAT/ACL I suppose, but I could always find something only for 8.4 iOS and not 8.6... Perhaps and no doubt I already missed the configuration with the unwanted controls, but I've tried various things...

    Please, if you have an idea, let me know! Thank you very much!

    Hello

    I've never used "global" option in ACL, but it looks to be the origin of the problem. Cisco doc.

    "The global access rules are defined as a special ACL that is processed for each interface on the device for incoming traffic in the interface. Thus, although the ACL is configured once on the device, it acts as an ACL defined for Management In secondary interface-specific. (Global rules are always in the direction of In, never Out Management). "

    You ACL: access-list extended dmz_acl to any any icmp echo

    For example, when you launch the ASA, there is an echo response from the router on the external interface--> global can block.

    Then to initiate router, the ASA Launches echo-reply being blocked again.

    Try to add permit-response to echo as well.

    In addition, you can use both "inspect icmp" in world politics than the ACL.

    If none does not work, you can run another t-shoot with control packet - trace on SAA.

    THX

    MS

  • IPSec tunnels between duplicate LAN subnets

    Hi all

    Please help to connect three sites with our Central site has all the resources for users, including internet access.

    The three sites will be the ASA 5505 like their WAN device.

    We need to know is - it possible, allowing to configure an IPsec Tunnel between the three ASA with duplicate LAN subnets.

    Central site two networks 192.168.1.x 24, 192.168.100.x 24

    Distance a 24 192.168.1.x subnet

    Two remote a subnet 192.168.100.x 24

    If it is possible we also do hair distance one ping, above two remote to the Central Site to access internet, what sites need are on the Central Site, including e-mail, network, other resource also records.

    We have no other way to make this network, as all security is on our Central Site, website filtering, Application filtering, filtering of network traffic all.

    We understand that we can change two remote sites to a different subnet from the Central Site, but we have so many host devices, it will take weeks or months, so to change the MS AD domain for all users, servers too.

    We really need your expertise to do this in a laboratory and then in production.

    Thank you

    Hello Stephen,

    You can check the following links for the subnets overlap talk to each other:-

    1 LAN-to-LAN IPsec VPN with overlapping networks

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a0080b37d0b.shtml

    2 IPsec between two IOS routers with overlapping of private networks

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps5855/products_configuration_example09186a0080a0ece4.shtml

    Important point is local network must connect to the remote network via the translated addresses.

    for example, you won't be ablt to use real IP of the communication.

    For haripinning or turning U:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00805734ae.shtml

    Hope that helps.

    Kind regards

    Dinesh Moudgil

Maybe you are looking for