Is it a GTX980 be much better than my 960?
One of my friends became one of the new Nvidia cards (1080?) and gave me his old 980 GTX super cheap. This update would make much difference in Photoshop CC 2015 compared to my current 960? I can see online test the 980 is roughly twice as fast, but I don't know if this applies to Photoshop somehow. I don't game anymore.
My configuration:
k monitor 4 running at full resolution
Win 10 64 - bit
i5-6400 2.7 Ghz
16 GB of RAM
GTX 960
For now, Photoshop is the most intensive thing I do on this PC. The small fan on my 960 is a bit noisy, and my friend tells me that his 980 is super quiet. In addition, I am considering possibly dabbling in some basic 3D at some point stuff.
Thanks for any help.
It can help the Adobe applications such as after effects and Premier, but also your games, far from a Photoshop goes I don't think you see no improvement. There may be some, but I expect that it is a major improvement.
Tags: Photoshop
Similar Questions
-
Static text is much better than the dynamic text with the same font settings
Hello
I have exactly the same parameters for static and dynamic text, but the static text seems much sharper. Someone knows why?
Police: Trebuchet MS
Size: 30 pt
Anti-alias for readability
There is a slight difference, but I would not say much better. Incorporate you the dynamic text characters.
-
- Just installed Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade - 32-bit
- Installed on the old Dell Dimension Dsktp 4500 s
- Monitor is a Dell S199WFP Flat widescreen.
- Everything seems fine, but the screen display resolution is messed up
- Display resolution is set to 640 x 480, then it should be something like 1024 x 768
- I can't change the resolution in the control panel
- the screen is recognized as "Non - PnP Monitor on Standard VGA Graphics Adapter generic
- It also seems that the driver is up-to-date
What's wrong?!? Someone please help.
Thank you!
I remember that when I tried to install the driver, there's a message that says that it is said that it is not supported. I don't know if I reinstalled the older operating system and then the new driver and vista or if there was a button to install the driver, even though it was not taken in charge. Most likely, I installed the driver on the old XP operating system and then applied the upgrade to Vista. I always run a clean install to clean any spyware etc. The driver supports the X 9 live is what it takes. Use Vista driver is already installed. I plan to upgrade to windows 7 in January and display the results.
-
can not play videos more even if I have adobe flash worked before better than chrome or explorer
Hello
I love firefox videos esp. Much better than the internet explore and chrome. Very stable and smooth. He played very well and then crashed. I thought it might be a few programs I uninstalled as shockwave who played hell with my computer. I uninstalled and reinstalled mozilla firefox and adobe flash player, but still could not play videos you tube, or golf revolution, etc. I took a screenshot, but I do not see an attachment to send you. It says I have to update adobe flash player or adobe flash player is required for video playback, which I have already done several times but it still doesn't appear in my firefox plugins. Please notify.
Have you downloaded the Flash Installer via this page?
Do you see the Flash plugin in its installation folder?
You should find the plugin Flash (NPSWF32_11_X_XXX_XXX.dll) file in this folder after you run the installer of Flash:
- 32-bit Windows: C:\Windows\System32\Macromed\Flash\
- 64-bit Windows: C:\Windows\SysWOW64\Macromed\Flash\
See also:
-
I used to have Firefox version 4 mt Desktop... then that you asked, I've updated to version 5... then everything happened in my computer... When I click the icon to open Firefox... it takes a long time to open and what I got is the following: script is not responding... a script on this page may be busy, or it may stop responding.
Script chrome://taugt/content/libs/includejs:595
Then my computer froze and stop working... I tried uninstalling and reinstalling several times but it's always the same failure.
I never had problem with version 4... Please let me download version 4 new... it is much, much better than this one again.
I have windows XP.
I hope I gave you enough information... If you held more... Please contact meHi Juan, you will need to only maintain Shift to use the Safe Mode, which is just to test. If you have disabled your addons, then you can simply start Firefox normally.
-
The 70 d is significantly better than the 7 d in the management of the high ISO situations?
I have a 6 d and it really spoiled me with its low noise high ISO capabilities. I wonder if the 70 d is much better than my 7 d when it comes to managing high ISO. It has the same sensor as the 6 d and I really like this display on D 70.
It is not "clearly" better - you will not see the difference that you can with the 6 d and higher models.
-
Lightroom is really better than a bridge and ACR?
I use Bridge and ACR for years. I have been turned off to learning Lightroom, but feel I can do is not so much because it seems the standard for photo editing.
So I sat down and tried to understand, and it was a pain in my butt. I guess that's just the learning curve, but it is not as simple as I thought it would be.
Is it really that much better than ACR and bridge? Should I even waste my time to learn?
If you have a good Bridge/ACR workflow then technically has no interest that Lightroom if you compare editing capabilities. Lightroom and Camera Raw have both share the same raw processing engine. You can get the same results of both programs. I switched to Lightroom years because I just love some of the things in the interface is better I like to work with Camera Raw. But it's my choice. I take no sides of the cataloging features as much as I can in Lightroom. I use it mainly for the develop module features. And I want to print from Lightroom as well. I don't think you should feel loose or lower when you talk to other photographers, just because you use Camera Raw and Bridge. Tools can give identical results. It's mostly a matter of choosing which is best for you.
-
I have a Yamaha psr-330 midi keyboard
I have an Akai mpk261midi keyboard
I have an Alesis v61 midi keyboard
they all sound the same in Logic Pro X, I can barely hear the sound of the piano, the pressure sensitivity is out of whack, I basically just plug and play midi keyboards and use software instruments without changing anything in Logic Pro X... why does my little Apple Wireless (bluetooth, remember) clearer keyboard better, more responsive and much stronger than any general midi keyboard? its embarrassing to say the least!
I have the volume to the maximum one time and even raised the gain on the software instrument "Piano Steinway tail" and still barely, I could hear a noise...
Please help me I have no other solution... IV ' e tasted its best thanks to a computer keyboard dang, how is this possible?
How can I get my midi keyboards sound as good as my computer wireless keyboard?
-
Image display bottom much darker than they are
I always liked Firefox. As a web designer and developer, FF has proved to be my favorite browser over and over again; However, since I've upgraded to the latest version of FF 6.0 beta, all background images on my html files saved on my PC screen a lot, much, much darker than they really are. IE normal poster and this is the first time that I had problem with FF and IE not. Please address. Also, FF also added in random around the anchor points when borders I hover over them.
This may be due to a problem with the profile for your monitor screen colors or color profiles embedded in images.
You can disable color management to test this.
You can set the pref to 0 on the subject gfx.color_management.mode: configuration page to disable color management.
You have to close and restart Firefox for the changes to take effect.See:
-
Windows Vista Service Pack (basic information)
Hello
I know this may seem a simple/stupid question, but I do not understand what are "Service Packs". I don't know much about computers.
I have restored my laptop to the factory setting today and I reinstall my programs again. I am trying to install a new program as well (Autodesk Inventor 2012). The installation says I can't because I need Service Pack 2 and I only have Microsoft Vista Home Premium (Version: 6.0.6001 Service Pack 1 Build 6001).
What are Service Packs? Can I upgrade to Service Pack 2 for free? If yes how? If I update it will help or hinder my system? Any pack is better than another?
Thanks for the information and assistance that you can give.
AstoriaBoro
You can install Service Pack 2 very simply - go to Windows Update and check for new updates - then install all available updates.
Once they are complete, return again (after a reboot) and do the same thing - repeat until there are no left.
Along the way you will be installed Service pack 2 :)
-
Why is windows 7 better than professional?
I was wondering why is windows 7 better than professional, because I want to see what features ultimate has this professional is not
Ultimate has some extra multimedia features, such as Windows Media Center. It also has the ability to run multiple languages, I think. In addition, there is not much difference. And if you do not need to connect to a domain, home edition Premium you will probably give everything that you need and want (and more).
Shawn B Keene | Microsoft contributor community
-
Why the LR5 catalog is better than PES 12 organizing?
Jim
I started using a trial version of the LR5.
I've been a regular user of the different versions of the EP over the years.
In general, I was pleased by the Organizer, & have various tags nested in each other.
I've never had a problem with it being unstable, and can usually find what I'm looking for.
(provided that I have correctly tagged it in the first place :-))
My first impression of the LR5 catalog is that it is not as intuitive.
I searched online for how to install the catalog & most of the discussion relates to catalogues how to have. -J' have already made that decision - just one:
So? What are the features I am missing in the LR5 catalog that make it better than the elements Organizer?
What do you think?
I am also a happy user of the Organizer, but I also use LR 4.4.
What I find interesting in LR:
-huge amount of customization possible and options (if you need it...)
-Ability to handle JPEG files as well as the raws (the Organizer doesn't let you open JPEGs in acr,)
-Smart ways to manage variants without copying files (virtual copies)
-The most advanced metadata management
-possibility to merge catalogs
-Much more supported by Adobe and user forums
-Advanced options in the output in the latest versions
What can be the subject of a debate, it's the difficulty of the learning curve, as well as the "robustness" of the software. The organizer has riddled many bugs (there were already several years before LR). The problem is that after having much more options makes more complex LR. For example, the database has three times the number of tables. It follows that LR forums are full of complaints about bugs or missing features... just because it's too rich and trying to satisfy the needs of each.
Several cases of problems with the Organizer are related to the function of backup that backs up the images and catalogs. Catalogues only backup LR. Backup of images is your responsibility. If you have problems, it isn't for lack of LR, it's yours.
I can't find a post I made to show the possible benefits of the Organizer, but it was just for fun.
-
PP CS5/5.5 overlay better than AE CS4?
Hello world.
I think I read somewhere earlier that the chrominance in CS5 PP/5.5 is better than Keylight in AE CS4. In fact, the PP effect can be improved Keylight, but I do not remember this for some.
If anyone can check this?
THX.
Paul
Keylight is still much superior, but Ultra key (the key effect I'm sure you're talking about) is capable enough and has the added advantage of being CUDA acclerated, so your keys to play in real time. It works best on images clean, well lit, well shot.
Keylight and Ultra are not related; Keylight is a third-party Foundry product, then that Ultra is derived from the Adobe of Serious Magic acquisition and their software saturation of inlay.
-
Rank() is really better than rownum for top-n-queries?
Several sources say that for databases Oracle rank() should be used instead of ' rownum < = not for top-n-queries. But here we have an application, where we have a lot of top-n queries are run on a large table with several million lines and rank() has a very bad performance. I get much better results when I use a query with rownum < = n, but the application programmer does not have to change it in the software because of these articles on rank() and rownum. I wonder, is it possible to find a better form of the rank () - request or an additional index, which gives me the same performance.
To explain my case, I created the following example (if you try it, be aware that depending on the size of your dba_objects you might need up to half of a free concert space in your space storage for this example).
create the table big_objects
as
Select
ASCII (m.alpha) * 100000 + o.object_id object_id,.
owner of o.Owner,
o.object_type,
m.Alpha: ' _'. o.object_name object_name,
SYSDATE-400+mod(100*object_id+99*ASCII(m.Alpha),365)+24/(o.object_id+ASCII(m.Alpha)) created
o.Status
Of
(select distinct)
Upper (substr(object_name,1,1)) alpha
Of
sys. DBA_OBJECTS
where
m Upper (substr (object_name, 1, 1)) between 'A' and 'Z').
sys. DBA_OBJECTS o
order by
object_name;
create index bigindex_1 on big_objects (owner, object_type, created);
analyze the big_objects statistical calculation table.
So my table looks a bit like dba_objects but with more lines, and I made a synthesis "created" date that is more similar to my actual case, where top-n designates a date of selection of the most recent records of a certain type.
This is the size of the segments on a nearly empty database 11 GR 2:
Select nom_segment, bytes, blocks of sys.dba_segments where nom_segment like '% BIG '.
BLOCKS OF BYTES NOM_SEGMENT
-------------- ---------- ----------
BIGINDEX_1 75497472 9216
BIG_OBJECTS 142606336 17408
On my database, the example of table is approx. 1.9 Mio rows:
Select count (*) in the big_objects;
COUNT (*)
----------
1884246
and about 1.4% of these lines have owner = 'SYS' and object_type = 'INDEX '.
Select
Count (*)
of big_objects
where owner = 'SYS '.
and object_type = 'INDEX ';
COUNT (*)
----------
25896
But I want to find the most recent 10 index only for the owner of the SYS. I think that the typical rank() approach would be:
Select
owner,
object_type,
object_name,
object_id,
status,
created
Of
(select
owner,
object_type,
object_name,
object_id,
status,
created,
Rank() over (order by created desc) rnk
Of
big_objects
where
owner = 'SYS '.
and object_type = 'INDEX')
where rnk < = 10
order by ASC created;
OWNER TYPE_OBJET FEATURE_NAME OBJECT_ID STATUS CREATED
------------------------------ ------------------- -------------------------------- ---------- ------- --------------------
SYS B_COLLELEMIND 6600515 INDEX VALID 15.04.2010 19:05:55
SYS V_I_WRI$ _OPTSTAT_IND_OBJ # _PL 8600466 15.04.2010 VALID INDEX 19:09:03
SYS G_I_RLS 7100375 INDEX VALID 15.04.2010 19:23:55
SYS V_I_DIR$ SERVICE_UI 8600320 INDEX VALID 15.04.2010 19:31:33
SYS L_I_TSM_DST2$ 7600308 INDEX VALID 15.04.2010 19:36:26
L_I_IDL_UB11 INDEX SYS 7600235 VALID 15.04.2010 19:57:34
INDEX SYS V_I_VIEWTRCOL1 8600174 15.04.2010 VALID 20:19:21
INDEX SYS L_I_TRIGGER2 7600162 15.04.2010 VALID 20:31:39
INDEX SYS L_I_NTAB1 7600089 15.04.2010 VALID 21:35:53
B_I_SYN1 INDEX SYS 6600077 VALID 15.04.2010 22:08:07
10 selected lines.
Elapsed time: 00:00:00.22
Execution plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Hash value of plan: 2911012437
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | 1427 | 188K | 1400 (1) | 00:00:17 |
| 1. SORT ORDER BY | 1427 | 188K | 1400 (1) | 00:00:17 |
|* 2 | VIEW | 1427 | 188K | 1399 (1) | 00:00:17 |
|* 3 | PUSHED RANK SORTING WINDOW | 1427 | 79912 | 1399 (1) | 00:00:17 |
| 4. TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | BIG_OBJECTS | 1427 | 79912 | 1398 (0) | 00:00:17 |
|* 5 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | BIGINDEX_1 | 1427 | 9 (0) | 00:00:01 |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):
---------------------------------------------------
2 - filter("RNK"<=10)
3 - filter (RANK () OVER (ORDER BY INTERNAL_FUNCTION ("CREATED") DESC) < = 10)
5 - access ("OWNER" = 'SYS' AND "OBJECT_TYPE" = 'INDEX')
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
1 recursive calls
0 db block Gets
25870 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
1281 bytes sent via SQL * Net to client
524 bytes received via SQL * Net from client
2 SQL * Net back and forth to and from the client
2 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
10 rows processed
Using the index, only the first two columns are used, all 25896 records I found above are read and ranked just to find the most recent of ten. Many unnecessary blocks are read and luckily all the necessary database blocks were already in memory. In our case real often enough a lot of physical reads are performed, which further aggravates the performance of the application.
In my example below with a ' rownum < = 10 ' all three columns in the index are used and the number of block receives is much, much smaller than in the rank() example.
Select
owner,
object_type,
object_name,
object_id,
status,
created
Of
big_objects
where
(owner, object_type, created)
in
(select
owner,
object_type,
created
Of
(select / * + first_rows (10) * /)
owner,
object_type,
created
Of
big_objects
where
owner = 'SYS '.
and object_type = 'INDEX '.
order by
owner,
object_type,
created desc
)
where rownum < = 10
)
order by ASC created;
OWNER TYPE_OBJET FEATURE_NAME OBJECT_ID STATUS CREATED
------------------------------ ------------------- -------------------------------- ---------- ------- --------------------
SYS B_COLLELEMIND 6600515 INDEX VALID 15.04.2010 19:05:55
SYS V_I_WRI$ _OPTSTAT_IND_OBJ # _PL 8600466 15.04.2010 VALID INDEX 19:09:03
SYS G_I_RLS 7100375 INDEX VALID 15.04.2010 19:23:55
SYS V_I_DIR$ SERVICE_UI 8600320 INDEX VALID 15.04.2010 19:31:33
SYS L_I_TSM_DST2$ 7600308 INDEX VALID 15.04.2010 19:36:26
L_I_IDL_UB11 INDEX SYS 7600235 VALID 15.04.2010 19:57:34
INDEX SYS V_I_VIEWTRCOL1 8600174 15.04.2010 VALID 20:19:21
INDEX SYS L_I_TRIGGER2 7600162 15.04.2010 VALID 20:31:39
INDEX SYS L_I_NTAB1 7600089 15.04.2010 VALID 21:35:53
B_I_SYN1 INDEX SYS 6600077 VALID 15.04.2010 22:08:07
10 selected lines.
Elapsed time: 00:00:00.03
Execution plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Hash value of plan: 3360237620
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | 10. 760. 17 (0) | 00:00:01 |
| 1. SORT ORDER BY | 10. 760. 17 (0) | 00:00:01 |
| 2. NESTED LOOPS |
| 3. NESTED LOOPS | 10. 760. 17 (0) | 00:00:01 |
| 4. VIEW | VW_NSO_1 | 10. 200 | 2 (50) | 00:00:01 |
| 5. UNIQUE HASH | 10. 200 | 4 (25) | 00:00:01 |
|* 6 | COUNTY STOPKEY |
| 7. VIEW | 11. 220. 3 (0) | 00:00:01 |
|* 8 | INDEX RANGE SCAN DESCENDING | BIGINDEX_1 | 1427 | 28540 | 3 (0) | 00:00:01 |
|* 9 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | BIGINDEX_1 | 3 | | 2 (0) | 00:00:01 |
| 10. TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | BIG_OBJECTS | 3. 168. 6 (0). 00:00:01 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):
---------------------------------------------------
6 - filter(ROWNUM<=10)
8 - access ("OWNER" = 'SYS' AND "OBJECT_TYPE" = 'INDEX')
9 - access ("OWNER" = "OWNER" AND "OBJECT_TYPE" = "OBJECT_TYPE" AND "CREATED" ="CREATED")
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
1 recursive calls
0 db block Gets
Gets 26 consistent
0 physical reads
0 redo size
1281 bytes sent via SQL * Net to client
524 bytes received via SQL * Net from client
2 SQL * Net back and forth to and from the client
1 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
10 rows processed
I made this comparison with versions of Oracle 10.2 and 11.2 and the result was more or less the same. How can I change the rank() query so that only the small number of really needed blocks are read from the database?Looks like this is one more place Oracle needs little hint :) 1 select 2 owner, 3 object_type, 4 object_name, 5 object_id, 6 status, 7 created 8 from 9 ( select /*+ index_desc(big_objects bigindex_1 ) */ 10 owner, 11 object_type, 12 object_name, 13 object_id, 14 status, 15 created, 16 rank() over (order by created desc) rnk 17 from 18 big_objects 19 where 20 owner = 'SYS' 21 and object_type = 'INDEX') 22 where rnk <= 10 23* order by created asc SQL> / OWNER OBJECT_TYPE OBJECT_NAME ------------------------------ ------------------- ------------------------------------- SYS INDEX B_I_TSM_SRC1$ SYS INDEX G_I_IDL_UB21 SYS INDEX B_I_PROCEDUREINFO1 SYS INDEX Q_I_TRIGGERJAVAC SYS INDEX B_I3_JIJOIN$ SYS INDEX V_I_FIXED_OBJ$_OBJ# SYS INDEX Q_I_OPQTYPE1 SYS INDEX L_I_NTAB2 SYS INDEX G_I_COLTYPE1 SYS INDEX B_I_SYN1 10 rows selected. Execution Plan ---------------------------------------------------------- 0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=ALL_ROWS (Cost=41064 Card=38923 B ytes=5293528) 1 0 SORT (ORDER BY) (Cost=41064 Card=38923 Bytes=5293528) 2 1 VIEW (Cost=39884 Card=38923 Bytes=5293528) 3 2 WINDOW (NOSORT STOPKEY) (Cost=39884 Card=38923 Bytes=2 335380) 4 3 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'BIG_OBJECTS' (TABL E) (Cost=39320 Card=38923 Bytes=2335380) 5 4 INDEX (RANGE SCAN DESCENDING) OF 'BIGINDEX_1' (IND EX) (Cost=190 Card=40151) Statistics ---------------------------------------------------------- 0 recursive calls 0 db block gets 14 consistent gets 0 physical reads 0 redo size 1083 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client 512 bytes received via SQL*Net from client 2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client 1 sorts (memory) 0 sorts (disk) 10 rows processedPublished by: Ramesh Eega, 21 May 2010 16:01
Published by: Ramesh Eega, 21 May 2010 16:05
-
Does anyone else have a problem with the left speaker is much lower than the right?
Any source that I use the left speaker is much lower than the left. If I put my finger on the right I can feel the pressure of air pushed but not by the left. Is it an iPhone defective 7?
Hello, TopDog16!
Welcome to congratulations on getting a new iPhone and Apple support communities 7. From what I see in your post, you have any questions on the stereo speakers in your new iPhone. I would be happy to help you with that!
Indeed, your iPhone has holes on both right and left sides on the lower edge (on each side of the connector of the Lightning). The holes on the right are only speaker on this edge of the phone, however. The other speaker in the pair is at the top of the phone, where the cut is, just above the screen. Check here to see if sound comes out.
This page has a large diagram of the iPhone of 7 speakers (in the section entitled "Buttons and external connectors"): iPhone 7 - technical specifications
Have a great rest of your week!
Maybe you are looking for
-
How to set the location of the function "reload the page" with the new update?
Since the new update, my previous settings have been changed and I can't get back them.I could already right-click and customize what I wanted to see, now, I have a "menu open from the things I've decided I don't want to see" option stuck right witho
-
Current date is 02/07/13
-
Integration attempt in trying to get the volume of a torus of revoling circle around the axis y. Central circle of distance from the origin R and radius r using slices. Standard simple calc problem often given to students. Works well on HP50 and TI-8
-
IdeaPad U310 Touch one finger scrolling
Hello I finally decided to upgrade my old Ideapad Y550 of 4 years and I'm pretty happy with my U310 so far. One thing I would change however, the habit of a scroll using my Y550 finger and I would have this return. Is it possible in the U310 to displ
-
All the music in question files saved on an external hard drive because I had to reinstall the operating system on my pc.