Is still around?

Similar Questions

• Why are my RMAN backup files still around?

  Environment:
  
  Oracle 11.2.0.3 EE on Solaris 64 bit
  
  Good morning (at least it's morning here at the moment),
  
  I have a test database that I have currently configured to do an incremental backup of level 0, every morning at about 03:00.
  
  I also do one "archivelog backup all" every 4 hours during the day.
  
  My archivelog deletion policy is "saved 2 times".
  
  I put RMAN in place with a 8 day recovery window (ALL - see below).
  
  I have multiple RMAN files dated 11 days ago.
  
  Question: Why these files are still around?
  

  RMAN> show all;
  
  using target database control file instead of recovery catalog
  RMAN configuration parameters for database with db_unique_name APSMDMP2 are:
  CONFIGURE RETENTION POLICY TO RECOVERY WINDOW OF 8 DAYS;
  CONFIGURE BACKUP OPTIMIZATION ON;
  CONFIGURE DEFAULT DEVICE TYPE TO DISK;
  CONFIGURE CONTROLFILE AUTOBACKUP ON;
  CONFIGURE CONTROLFILE AUTOBACKUP FORMAT FOR DEVICE TYPE DISK TO '%F';
  CONFIGURE DEVICE TYPE DISK BACKUP TYPE TO COMPRESSED BACKUPSET PARALLELISM 3;
  CONFIGURE DATAFILE BACKUP COPIES FOR DEVICE TYPE DISK TO 1;
  CONFIGURE ARCHIVELOG BACKUP COPIES FOR DEVICE TYPE DISK TO 1;
  CONFIGURE CHANNEL DEVICE TYPE DISK MAXPIECESIZE 5 G;
  CONFIGURE CHANNEL 1 DEVICE TYPE DISK FORMAT   '/rman/APSMDMP2/APSMDMP2_%T_%t_%s_%p';
  CONFIGURE CHANNEL 2 DEVICE TYPE DISK FORMAT   '/rman/APSMDMP2/APSMDMP2_%T_%t_%s_%p';
  CONFIGURE CHANNEL 3 DEVICE TYPE DISK FORMAT   '/rman/APSMDMP2/APSMDMP2_%T_%t_%s_%p';
  CONFIGURE MAXSETSIZE TO UNLIMITED;
  CONFIGURE ENCRYPTION FOR DATABASE OFF;
  CONFIGURE ENCRYPTION ALGORITHM 'AES128';
  CONFIGURE COMPRESSION ALGORITHM 'BASIC' AS OF RELEASE 'DEFAULT' OPTIMIZE FOR LOAD TRUE;
  CONFIGURE ARCHIVELOG DELETION POLICY TO BACKED UP 2 TIMES TO DISK;
  CONFIGURE SNAPSHOT CONTROLFILE NAME TO '/u01/app/oracle/product/11203/db_1/dbs/snapcf_APSMDMP2.f';

  I have several entries in V$ ARCHIVED_LOG with a BACKUP_COUNT = 1 but they are all dated to 21 days ago and have DELETED status as shown here:
  

   SEQUENCE# ARC APPLIED   DEL S CTIME                         BACKUP_COUNT
  ---------- --- --------- --- - ----------------------------- ------------
        4625 YES NO        YES D 09-oct-2012 13:21:09                     1
        4626 YES NO        YES D 09-oct-2012 13:21:48                     1
        4627 YES NO        YES D 09-oct-2012 13:22:23                     1
        4628 YES NO        YES D 09-oct-2012 13:22:50                     1

  I am able to see the content of the RMAN files, but I don't see anything that would cause them to not be removed during the RMAN runs. Here is an example of one of the files:

  BS Key  Type LV Size       Device Type Elapsed Time Completion Time
  ------- ---- -- ---------- ----------- ------------ -------------------
  6493    Incr 0  22.75G     DISK        01:35:54     2012-10-19:04:36:13
          BP Key: 6493   Status: AVAILABLE  Compressed: YES  Tag: FULL_DAILY
          Piece Name: /rman/APSMDMP2/APSMDMP2_20121019_797050819_6508_1
    List of Datafiles in backup set 6493
    File LV Type Ckp SCN    Ckp Time            Name
    ---- -- ---- ---------- ------------------- ----
    2    0  Incr 564035766  2012-10-19:03:00:19 /u05/oradata/APSMDMP2/sysaux01.dbf
    4    0  Incr 564035766  2012-10-19:03:00:19 /u05/oradata/APSMDMP2/users01.dbf
    5    0  Incr 564035766  2012-10-19:03:00:19 /u01/oradata/APSMDMP2/data_process_dt01_01.dbf
    9    0  Incr 564035766  2012-10-19:03:00:19 /u05/oradata/APSMDMP2/gmx_src_dt01_01.dbf
    10   0  Incr 564035766  2012-10-19:03:00:19 /u05/oradata/APSMDMP2/gmx_src_ix01_01.dbf
    12   0  Incr 564035766  2012-10-19:03:00:19 /u05/oradata/APSMDMP2/adm_data_ix01_01.dbf
    13   0  Incr 564035766  2012-10-19:03:00:19 /u05/oradata/APSMDMP2/patrol01_01.dbf
    16   0  Incr 564035766  2012-10-19:03:00:19 /u07/oradata/APSMDMP2/becosp_base_data_01.dbf
    18   0  Incr 564035766  2012-10-19:03:00:19 /u07/oradata/APSMDMP2/becosp_base_data_02.dbf
    27   0  Incr 564035766  2012-10-19:03:00:19 /u06/oradata/APSMDMP2/data_process_dt01_03.dbf
    30   0  Incr 564035766  2012-10-19:03:00:19 /u05/oradata/APSMDMP2/adm_data_dt01_02.dbf

  I use the "DELETE NOPROMPT OBSOLETE' after each database and backup archivelog. Here is my command file 0 extra strength:
  

  backup incremental level 0 cumulative database tag 'full_db';
  backup archivelog all not backed up 2 times tag 'full_arch';
  DELETE NOPROMPT OBSOLETE;

  I know I can manually remove the files and everything with a resync OVERLAP but I was trying to understand why it happened in the first place.
  
  Any suggestions are welcome.
  
  Please let me know if you need more information.
  
  Thank you very much!!
  
  -gary

  Hmm

  Perhaps, I see your logic.

  I post a thread as an editing tool that explains better than any I've seen.

  Give him a look and see if the answer isn't here.

  Best regards

  mseberg

• Hi, have not been here for awhile. Is John Izer still around?

  I'm looking for a cheap good Canon camera. I have an A70 has died. You want to replace it with something similar. Papa John and John helped me in the past forums differed a lot then.

  Hi, farmhandvp,

  I don't know if you're in the right place or not, but this is a support forum where users of windows are helping each other.

  If you are interested in Canon cameras, the best place to look would be the Canon site.

  PowerShot cameras.

  http://www.USA.Canon.com/Cusa/consumer/products/cameras/digital_cameras

  EOS cameras.

  http://www.USA.Canon.com/Cusa/consumer/products/cameras/slr_cameras

  Good luck.

• My download folder is empty in my computer, but according to firefox my downloaded items are still there. Can someone explain this?

  The files I downloaded are still on the download list (small box). However, the download in my documents folder is empty. These files are still around?

  You can right click on a file in the Download Manager window to check that.
  
  Open and open the folder that contains are grey in the context menu, then the file is no longer present in the original download location.

  • https://support.Mozilla.org/KB/downloads+window

• CAN´t stop Firefox to make a frame around linked picture blue!

  I tried to add:
  an img {border: none ;}}

  the CSS code

  but the framework is still around the linked picture!

  Try border = '0' in the real image tag (in the HTML language - not CSS)

  as in:

• Turning to black screen after the value time/RAM used FireFox

  Hello

  My question is for the graphics. It lasts for several months now and he came to a point where it starts eating away at me.

  I installed recently (within 6 months) 16 GB of RAM and a new extra GPU. I upgraded to an ATI Radeon HD 5750 to a Gigabyte Radeon R9 x 270. I never had this problem with my 5750 card, so that initially led me to believe it was a card problem, until I discovered that my problem seems to be ONLY with FireFox.

  Now to the question: arriving to 2.8 GB + of memory used (according to Task Manager), FireFox flashes for a brief moment and to scroll the screen or between tabs, becomes completely black, forcing me to re - load the browser. Now the first question of the use of FireFox, so initially, amount of RAM is crazy, and I tried to lower the settings by disabling extensions, all sorts of things and the fulfillment of the only thing that is extend the time before flash made his boring appearance.

  The screen flashes problem seems to be quite something else. I tried to upgrade to the latest version of FireFox, run a new installation of FireFox, update my graphic drivers their latest versions, just about everything I can think of, and nothing seems to fix. What seems to be the problem here? I would be very happy all feedback and better understand how I can solve this problem outside hard using a different web browser.

  Hardware specifications:
  Motherboard ASUS P6X58D
  Intel Core i7 930 @2. 8 GHz processor
  22 GB of total RAM (3 branches of 2 and 2 strips of 8)
  Gigabyte Radeon R9 270 x GPU
  Brand/model unknown 850W of power (honestly, I'm just too lazy to remove the top of my tower which is packed in a locked drawer to figure out the make and model at display time)

  Running FireFox in safe mode seems to have solved or at least slow the excessive RAM issue however FireFox has now terrible performance much earlier. Adding constantly freezes and scripts constantly crashing, it would seem that addons and extensions that I ran helped to solve these issues.

  What I do now is to reload firefox standard and turn my extensions one by one to see which seems to be the cause of most of the points in the use of the ram.

  AdBlock Plus seems to so far be keep stable FireFox without problem. Going to turn in my next toolbar. Will edit this post more information after having observed the behavior of FireFox.

  Edit: The reason to believe it's my toolbar like with AdBlock plus, FireFox was still around or less 1 GB to use physical RAM. After the reactivation of my toolbar, I jumped up to 2 GB. Contact the developer of the toolbar soon.

• How to check a page with a gray triangle?

  Often I play a game online through FaceBook, where you can watch videos, etc. to get rewards for you help in the game. Everything was fine until I recently updated my Linux Mint to 17.1 and who came with FireFox 33.0.

  Now when I start the game through FaceBook I get the "grey triangle" and I'm prevented from watching the videos, I am presented with the message "this connection is not approved.

  Is it all still around that? Any help would be greatefully received!

  When you visit the URL of video, you visit https sites?
  In the affirmative, please make sure that your time on the computer is correct and current.

  See also: error "this connection is untrusted" message - what to do

• Satellite A50 - problem gambling

  Hello
  When I try to play MURIEL (Medal of Honor: Allied Assualt) on my phone A50 Toshibe I am having some problems.
  My laptop has all the minimum system requirements and I have the whole GALIMA-settings to the lowest. My framerate is still around 20-30 (which is low for games) and it's still when the game starts with the intro to ea logo. When MURIEL reading my % of cpu is 99-100. When I check my use of GPU it uses only 7 MB to 64 MB MAX I have all the latest drivers. It seems that MURIEL does not even recognize my graphics card.
  Please help me.

  Xenon NL

  Hello

  As Feliks said, the graphic driver has a function of protection due to overheating.
  If the laptop is running with a maximum performance all the parties produce a lot of heat. This can damage the device. In this case, some drivers downgrade the graphics performance.
  It is a simple fact.
  Well, you can try to use the other drivers, but as you know: at your own risk!

  Good luck

  Good bye

• Chromebook 14: 14 Chromebook accepts more power

  Hello

  I bought a Factory reconditioned Chromebook 14 several months (24/03/2016).  Today, I plugged the chromebook for a bit of extra power (battery to 64% at the time). I noticed that the charge indicator on the battery icon in the lower right corner of the screen comes on.  Then I unplugged the power cord and plugged in. The indicator light on the side of the chromebook (next to the electric cannon) is a turn on.  After moving the cable of load at 3 different points of sale in the House (which have been confirmed working by other devices with the help of power), I determined that the problem is indeed with the Chromebook (or the power cable).  At this point, the battery is still around 60% and I chromebook turned off where the diagnostic data are needed.

  Other forums, I looked through so far have asked for the release of crosh on a battery test, I ran. The output is below:

  Welcome to crosh, the developers of Google Chrome OS shell.
  
  If you got here by mistake, don't panic!  Just close this tab and operate.
  
  Enter 'help' for a list of commands.
  
  crosh > battery_test
  No test of specified length. Default value of 300 seconds.
  Battery (64,98% left)
  The battery: 94,36%
  Please wait...
  Battery of 0.69% in 300 second (s).
  crosh >

  Please help.  I don't know if it's the charging cable, or the chromebook himself.  The battery seems fine. It just seems to be a problem with the entrance of power between the wall and the machine itself.

  Here's the whole problem, end-to-end.  I spoke to a Google Chromebook support Member who accompanied me through a hard reset-both with the power cable connected and without. This term did nothing. They me transferred to HP support. He checked that I didn't have another device to test the power cable, or another power cable to test the powered chromebook.

  While on the phone, we talked about how this was a buy refurbished with a 90 day warranty, and given that it was day 91 (Yes, the problem started the day after the expiry of the 90 day warranty), I had 2 options - pay $43 plus taxes and delivery for a new power cable , or pay $229 to send in the chromebook for maintenance.

  At that point, I decided I think about my options and call later with a decision.  In the meantime, I went and read amazon.com for power cable options and came across this:

  https://www.Amazon.com/replacement-adapter-Chromebook-laptop-computer/DP/B00IZQSP8K/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&QID=1467039372&SR=8-2&keywords=Chromebook+14+power+cord

  It came in the mail yesterday, and I was able to verify that it works with my chromebook (model 14-q039wm) and load the chromebook very well indeed.  My problem has been resolved with a new feeder from amazon for $15.99 + shipping costs.

  Thanks for helping make me the representative of Google!

• Improved LabVIEW 8 to 2013 and VI asked now to find the installation package for Run-Time Engine 7.0

  I recently installed LabVIEW 2013 on a computer (running Windows XP 32-bit).  The machine has also of LabVIEW 8 is installed, which is what I used before the upgrade.  I opened a VI has been created in LV8 and then saved it and all its subVIs in LV2013.  Now when I open the VI in LV2013 and try to run it, a window opens asking me to find the installation package 'lvruntimeeng.msi' for LabVIEW Run-Time Engine 7.0.  If I cancel this dialog box, and the subsequent message, indicating that the installion files were not, the VI appears (at least of the initial inspection) to function normally.

  I have closed LabVIEW, downloaded Run-Time Engine 7.0 on the site of NOR and tried to install it, but I received a message saying that it is already installed (as I had suspected).  How can I determine what part of the VI and/or its subVIs tries to make use of Run-Time Engine 7.0?  If not, how can I get LabVIEW to use instead the Run-Time Engine 2013 that was installed when I upgraded to LabVIEW 2013?

  Bob_Schor wrote:

  You run your VI of a project?  If so, you can watch the dependencies and get an idea of what live "in charge", you might have.  There may be "something old" in your code in LabVIEW 8, which was replaced in 2013, but ' plane still around "-If you can identify it, you can probably replace it with its"more modern"equivalent

  If you do not have the VI in a project, you can simply open LabVIEW, create a blank project and add your first level VI.  If all of your relevant screws are in a single folder, add the entire folder.  Now look in the dependencies.

  BS

  Yes, I run the VI from within a project of LV.  After some more research in the knowledge base OR I could solve the problem by using the following procedure:

  1. use the measurement and Automation Explorer to uninstall Run-Time Engine 7.0

  2. restart the PC

  3. open the project, close the project by choosing "save all".

  4. restart the PC

  5 reinstall the Run-Time Engine 7.0 using a file downloaded from ni.com

  6. restart the PC

  7. open the project, close the project by choosing "save all".

  8. open the project and run the VI.  No more messages on LabVIEW, trying to find the Run-Time Engine 7.0.

• Pavilion 550-a17c: how good are the graphics?

  Hello, I am looking to buy a new computer and I am looking for one that will be able to run modern games such as Grand Theft Auto V (GTA V), H1Z1, Hardline Battlefield, perhaps Mod of Garry's (Gmod) and any other game that will be released in a future that seems interesting to me. I have seen that this particular computer has all of the minimum requirements for GTA V, but the only thing I don't know is the graphics card, it's good enough to meet the minimum requirement or even recommended requirement? Please help, if this video card work it will save me $400 on a computer that I know will work. Thank you!

  NitroTY19,

  If your still around, I hope you see this. DO NOT BUY this device. There is NO graphic slot.

  There no PCIEx16.  Look at the photo of the motherboard and the description.

• HP photosmart c6150: my hp printer is not a symbol $.

  Then I will try to set up my hotspot for my printer. Did very well until I have try to put the password. Which includes a symbol $. And the list of available symbols include not one $. It's crazy. Is it all still around that. Download the upgrade. I use the small screen and available wireless Assistant threw the printer. So all options please let me know. Thank you.

  I have it. Had to Google on how to do this for a hotspot. But it worked. Thanks many many... thought that I had to buy a new printer. Very excited... Yahoo... ☺

• 2008 R2 web limits Server edition

  I try to install the support tools on Server 2008 Web, but it does not cscripts or xcopy.  Is it all still around that.

  Hello

  For assistance on this issue, you can post your question in the Forums of Techent.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/categories/

• I received an email that said Microsoft will pay me if I send this e-mail to third parties.

  Hello

  I received an email that said Microsoft will pay me if I send this e-mail to third parties. $245 for each email sent. I just want to confirm that it is this true or false?

  Hello

  I received an email that said Microsoft will pay me if I send this e-mail to third parties. $245 for each email sent. I just want to confirm that it is this true or false?

  That the hoax is so old, I'm surprised it's still around here.
  http://www.snopes.com/InBoxer/nothing/Microsoft-AOL.asp

• 2 revolutionary war does not not on Windows 7 (graphic corruption)

  I just installed the game 2 war of independence (which is a game of 2001) on Windows 7. He used to work on XP, and it does not work until the main menu of windows 7. However, at the time of entry in the physical game (i.e. using the graphics engine of the game), much graphical corruption occurs and the game hangs and I have to use the Task Manager to close. He once gave me the BSOD also. All my other games (the most recent including red faction guerrilla, crysis, farcry 2) everything works perfectly. I suspect it could be cos its an old game, so it could be the graphics driver that I need to roll back or even windows 7. I need to know if anyone has this problem and if they have found a solution for it.

  I have a Core i7 with a Palit Geforce GTX 275 and 2 GB of RAM Corsair DDR 3. I read a lot of cases where people are playing this game on Windows 7 without any problem. Please let know us if you want more details to help me with this problem I really love this game, but I also like Windows 7.

  Dexter83,
  If you have updated your driver graphic and tried the game in compatibility mode so it's not much else you can do.  Game developers (if he's still around) will have to create a hotfix or an update for the game.  You can check the forum I-war2 on the Atari website.  They may have more specific information about the do work with WIndows 7. Mike - Engineer Support Microsoft Answers
  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.