Jdev 12.1.2.0.0: Bounded taskflow are not not in the regions in the component palette

With the help of jdev versino 12.1.2.0.0. Created a project (Provider.jpr) with a stubborn workflow. Created file system. As the library of the ADF added jar of this project to another project (Consumer.jpr). Now, when I opened a jspx consumer and open, component palette > Select Provider.jar from the drop-down list, in the section of the regions, the stubborn taskflow is not listed.

However, when adfc-config is open, the stubborn taskflow appears in the component palette when the container is selected. Is this a bug or is there a change in the behavior of previous versions?

Ah, your bft was built with the faclets who are new to 12 c and cannot be used in pages based on JSF.

If you want to use the old technology JSPX, you need to create the fragments with "JSP XML" instead of facelets.

Question is why are you using jspx task flow if you use 12 c? Workflow based on faclets agree better (smaller and faster).

Timo

Tags: Java

Similar Questions

  • Passing the parameter to bounded taskflow with setPropertyListener

    Hi, OTN,.

    I can't get how to pass a parameter of ADF defined taskflow entry while I'm trying to follow the dev guide.

    On my JSF page in an area, I have a command button with setPropertyListener. Him his "code:"
    <af:commandButton text="newInformation" id="cb14"
                                      action="newInformation">
                      <af:setPropertyListener type="action"
                                              from="Hello"
                                              to="#{pageFlowScope.inputValue}"/>
                    </af:commandButton>
    JDev warns me that "inputValue is an unknown property.
    action "newInformation" navigates the region to a taskflow bounded, which has input parameter:
    <input-parameter-definition>
          <name>inputParm1</name>
          <value>#{pageFlowScope.inputValue}</value>
          <class>java.lang.String</class>
        </input-parameter-definition>
    Taskflow call activity has input parameter:
        <task-flow-call id="new-inf-tfd">
          <task-flow-reference>
            <document>/WEB-INF/new-inf-tfd.xml</document>
            <id>new-inf-tfd</id>
          </task-flow-reference>
          <input-parameter>
            <name>inputParm1</name>
            <value>#{pageFlowScope.parm1}</value>
          </input-parameter>
        </task-flow-call>
    On the default view of taskflow activity I want to display the parameter:
    <p>
        Here's your param:<af:outputText id="ot1" value="#{pageFlowScope.parm1.inputValue}"/>
    </p>
    And I don't see anything there.
    What did I miss?

    JDev 11.1.1.1.0. Thank you.

    Hi ILya Cyclone,

    I think you're confused. I think it should be like this:

    On my JSF page:


    action = "newInformation" >

    from = 'Hello '.
    to = "#{pageFlowScope.inputValue}" / >

    in stubborn taskflow, which has input parameter:


    inputParm1
    #{pageFlowScope.inputParam}
    java.lang.String

    Taskflow call activity has input parameter:



    /Web-INF/new-INF-TFD.XML
    new-inf-tfd


    inputParm1
    #{pageFlowScope.inputValue}

    On the default view of taskflow activity:


    Here are your settings:

    Sameh Nassar

  • ADF bound taskflow files divided into different folders

    Hi all

    I have problem with linked adf taskflow.
    our project have hundreds of bound taskflow so I want to divide it into different folder.
    so far, I can create boundtaskflow in the WEB - INF folder.
    But when I create another subfolder for example. WEB-INF/POC then, my taskflow linked in this folder can not find more.
    is it possible to split files in different folders?

    With respect,
    WP

    To move a taskflow, select the taskflow, Refactor menu-> Move.

  • A question about Application module and bounded taskflows

    Hello

    One of my friends sent me this question that I could not answer. The question is:


    Your application contains a workflow bounded with four pages.

    The pages are all based on different application modules and the workflow has the property of transaction, the value 'Always Begin new Transaction, and a commit operation is defined as the return of the activity. The user makes a few changes on each page, but a validation failure happens on the links on the third page.

    Which of these scenarios describes the outcome of this situation?

    A. None of the changes on pages undertakes all are cancelled.

    B. pages one and two and four engaged; page three is not validated.

    C. changes to the first two pages are validated; changes on the last two pages are not committed.

    D. it depends on the value that has been set in the property Transaction on each module of the application.

    I suggest the answer is A, but the answer my friend is C.

    What is your suggestions

    Thank you

    You are right.

    The point of transaction is that a couple of operation may be validated or cancelled together.

    If a stubborn workflow starts with a new transaction, when he wishes to complete, he must call a task flow return activity validation or cancellation. They call the underlying commit() or rollback() operations on the associated data control framework, essentially validation or restoring all the data attached to the frame controls.


    http://www.Oracle.com/technetwork/developer-tools/ADF/learnmore/ADF-task-flow-TRANS-Fund-v1-1-1864319.PDF

  • Passing parameters to bounded taskflow doubt

    Hello

    I tested the variable scopes during the call to the stubborn workflow.

    I have read the documentation on passing parameters to BTF.

    [http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E21764_01/web.1111/b31974/taskflows_parameters.htm#CHDIAIJJ]

    I have a guy in section 16.6 that say

    + If a stubborn workflow is implemented using a call activity of workflow, such as a region ADF or as a dynamic of the ADF region, you can specify parameter values using the standard EL expression syntax. For example, you can specify parameters using the #{bindings.bindingId.inputValue} or #{bindings.bindingId} or simply the syntax #{inputValue}. +

    That my guy is when I specify the value of the setting that I have to go must I use binding.something.inputValue or I can use someOthersScopes.myValue or something else.

    Thank you

    Published by: DV on 26 - it is a-2011 17:51

    Published by: DV on 30 - it is a-2011 11:39

    Hello

    Popup is called before Gets the value through setPropertyListener command, so the value is not be assigned to the param pageflowscope by the time popup is displayed, then the behavior observed.

    You must use in the manner set out in this doc pass parameter to a parent page/taskflow.

    Here is the code example:

    
      
         
        
      
      
      
        
         
      
    
    
    Popup code:
    
      
      
      
          
      
    
    
    Finally, retrieve the value from viewScope in pagedef:
    
         
              
         
    
    

    Jean Lou

  • Bounded TaskFlow onExit how to?

    Hi there;

    Imagine, my main page has an intermediate region dinamic, so even if the user navigate through the menus, this region shows him each linked form;

    It is straight and well when we run-one-time onEnter procedure;

    Now I want to clean some viewsObjects, (viewCriterias), relative to the exit to exceute-a-time procedure;

    How can I force a procedure of bounded task output stream?





    Thank you

    Marcos Ortega
    Campo Grande - Brasil

    Hmmm, I'm not sure that I understand what you're asking, but you do not know the initializer and finalizer listeners on the workflow?

    CM.

  • How to call a taskflow based on results from the drop-down list. ?

    Hello

    I want to call a taskflow based on the results of the drop-down list, I have a drop down list with LOV, if I choose a value insofar as it must call the taskflow are entrusted to him. How to do this. ?. How to assign a taskflow for all values and how to call it. Someone please help...

    Page:

    http://Java.Sun.com/JSP/page"version ="2.1 ".

    xmlns:af ="http://xmlns.oracle.com/adf/faces/rich" >. "

    valuePassThru = 'true '.

    valueChangeListener = "#{SelectBean.onSelection}" > "

    Main.XML (TaskFlow);

    http://xmlns.Oracle.com/ADF/controller"version ="1.2">

    Choose

    Choose.JSFF

    /Web-INF/FirstTF.XML

    FirstTF

    /Web-INF/SecondTaskFlow.XML

    SecondTaskFlow

    Choose

    First

    FirstTF

    Second

    SecondTaskFlow

    Code VlaueChange Listner already told you.

    First and second pages only contain output text component in my example. I think that is not necessary

    Concerning

    Vincent

  • Bounded gets dialog task flow that The ADF tent last pop entry scope page error stack flow controller

    I have a flow of stubborn task that I throw like a line-popup dialog box.  There are buttons with an action listener.  When I use AdfFacesContext.getCurrentInstance () .returnFromDialog (returnValue, null) at the end of the code in the event the message I get is

    ADFC 12001: The ADF controller pop tent last entry of error in page flow scope stack.

    The error is displayed in the debug window, but does not stop the application or display the message in the application.

    I use JDev 11.1.1.7

    Everything seems to work, why so this error occurring?

    I've seen this error, but no clear answer-related positions.

    Hello

    seems that the workflow is trying to clean up but there is nothing to clean up. I can't find any entry in the database of bugs, but think it's because the workflow in fact - if present in a dialog online - is not stacked.

    Frank

  • Taskflow dynamic array and reset the user interface States

    Hi team.

    I use JDeveloper 11.1.2.4.

    I have a nice flow dynamic bounded task that has a view main activity.  Links to view activity change as part of the workflow.  The workflow is initialized with a navigation event.  The display shows just a table of data corresponding to the navigation event.  The table is sortable.  It all works very well.

    The challenge that I meet is that users do not want details of the sort on the table has persisted between navigation events.  So they select NavA, the query executes against ViewA.  They select NavA, they query executes against ViewB.  The table and the activity of the view are the same.  And, during the navigation, in the framework of task flow not related, the display does not actually change in the region.  It is updated with the appropriate data, but the genre are also persisted.  It feels like the client stores the State of the table that I'm not able to remove the sorting criteria of the Rich Table via a managed bean.  Certainly, it feels like what must be launched from the client instead of a managed bean. I don't want to add buttons to view activity to do the reset, because users want this to be triggered by the navigation event.

    If I spend a dynamic unrelated workflow and to return to the dynamic workflow, so details are reset beautifully.  However, this is not an option for the users.

    Any suggestions on the approach would be appreciated.

    Thank you


    BradW

    OK, so I had to add this feature to my menu:

      public void setResetMainRegion(String regionName){
        if (regionName != null && !"".equals(regionName)){
          UIComponent mainRegion = JSFUtils.findComponentInRoot(regionName);
          RichTable table = (RichTable)JSFUtils.findComponent(mainRegion, "DynamicCodeTablesTab");
          if (table != null){
            List sc = new ArrayList() ;
            table.setSortCriteria(sc);
            AdfFacesContext ctx = AdfFacesContext.getCurrentInstance();
            ctx.addPartialTarget(table);
          }
    
        }
    

    The thing is that we must find the component, as it is extremely difficult to work with PageFlowScoped managed beans that have been created to support tables.  Such a simple fix, it took you a while to understand where the issue should be resolved.  It seems that some of these issues have to keep longer appears outside the BTF.  Not ideal because this introduces too many dependencies.  Trying to minimize as much as we can.

    BradW

  • 11.1.2.3 JDEV get the selected value of RichSelectOneChoice at the bean (but not in the value change listener)

    We have implemented our own listener of downloading files to export the table data in Excel. The reason for this was that we did not want certain columns to export.

    We have the collectionmodel table. All columns have been extracted from the table and for each column the value inside the component was read and written in the outputstreamwriter.

    Now the problem is, we have a few selectonechoice fell in the columns of the table read-only. For components, it exports the data that the index selected and the value selected.

    Is it possible that I can get the selectedValue of the component of type RichSelectOneChoice in the bean?

    We use Jdev pointers 11.1.2.3... Any are appreciated...

    Found the solution. Add LOV VO as iterator in a combination to page and access it as below... use index that selectonechoice.getvalue returns as well as the name of the iterator.

    BindingContainer links is BindingContext.getCurrent () .getCurrentBindingsEntry ();.
    DCIteratorBinding dciterContainer = (DCIteratorBinding) bindings.get (iteratorName);
    Ri rank = dciterContainer.getRowAtRangeIndex (index.intValue ());
    String val = (String) ri.getAttribute (attrName);

  • Why the bounding boxes are different between the XI Acrobat Pro and Acrobat DC?

    Hello

    Firstly apologies if this been asked elsewhere, but so far I have failed to find a solution.

    I have Acrobat Pro XI and Acrobat DC, each on two different PCs using Windows 8. Why the function edit text & Images interprets the same PDF document differently when displaying the bounding boxes. In Pro XI he produced 7 inclusive about 7 decent size paragraphs of text only. In MS bounding boxes are reduced to only 3 each effectively covering most thick of text in the document. To quickly select 3 of 7 bounding boxes to remove them entirely from my PDF seems not to be possible in DC, where I appear instead of having to select large portions of the text instead and delete accordingly.

    I don't see where in preferences maybe you can change the 'sensibility' or 'threshold' to distribute a PDF file in smaller sizes (but more) bounding boxes. Is it possible to make DC behave like a Pro XI?

    Any help would be appreciated.

    Mark

    These boxes are the result of speculation, well enough. The algorithm behind

    He probably changed between versions, so the different results.

    There is nothing you can do about it.

  • Bounding box, path points and control are not visible

    When I select an element, in this case of a building, to make changes, the entire file is selected instead of the building. There is nothing to separate when this happens. Can someone tell me how to solve this problem? Thank you

    PK,

    You can have a look for the mask of clipping or other means to disguise the work. You can start looking at the layers palette/Panel (expand as needed).

    Assuming that we are talking not only about view > Show Bounding Box (or Show Edges).

  • Set the breakpoint for the component browser jdev 11.1.2

    Hello:

    I have a project jdev which has various entity objects, display object, view links, etc.. No UI at all. What should I do in order to see the objects in the debugger? If I had a user interface, I put a breakpoint and the data is displayed in the debugger. I would break just before the component browser is displayed and discovers the entity objects, display objects, display them links, etc... How can I accomplish this?


    Thank you very much...

    do you mean component Palette... you mean the jdev ide debugging?
    or if you mean AM tester. then you can run the tester Am and play the breakpoint for the class generated for the OT, the VO and AOS Java...
    by default, the generated Java class will be an implementation file - EntityImpl, VOImpl, AMImpl
    chk here
    http://lh6.ggpht.com/-zfiT6m9Jae4/Td3BWFDks9I/AAAAAAAABbo/rcEfi4oDfXQ/S1600-h/image%25255B2%25255D.PNG

  • Bounding box does not object (Illustrator CS4)

    I don't know if this is a bug or a mistake on my part, but since last week, the bounding box for my objects really did match objects. It's really problematic when I try to turn the object using the bounding box handles.

    Occasionally, after I have transform the object covering the match again and will transform correctly. Sometimes it will stay off. If he refocus, undoing the changes back to the original size will cause the framework encompassing restore in his State do not match.

    Things, I tried to solve the problem:

    1. Reset bounding box
    2. Copy and paste the form to another document
    3. A new document from scratch (I thought it was possible I corrupted the file)
    4. Return the default keyboard shortcuts
    5. Restart Illustrator
    6. Rebooting my system

    To my knowledge, my system has not been last updated last week, or whatever again was installed. However, HE pushes the interview so there is a possibility that it has been updated and I don't know about it. The only programs open work in Illustrator is bridge, Outlook 2007, IE8, Explorer, InDesign CS4, Word 2007, Photoshop CS4, Acrobat 9 Professional, Dreamweaver CS4, PowerPoint 2007, Previewer and possibly FireFox 3. something (although not necessarily at the same time - usually about 7 of the above listed). My system is XP Professional SP3 with an Intel Core 2 Quad @ 2.66 GHz and 3.25 GB of RAM. The objects are not grouped, contain no clipping masks, contain no transparency masks and are not transparent traces. They are paths/simple forms, often of the rectangles.

    I've included some pics to explain better my problem. This first picture shows how the framework encompassing does not match the rectangle.

    MismatchedBoundingBox.gif

    The second image shows the process of transformation of the form through drag.

    TransformProcess.gif

    The third image shows the result.

    TransformResult.gif

    Thanks for any help you can provide!

    It is a display bug (?) that has been around for a while.  The corners of the rectangle enclosing space requirement and display then the bounding box must be established more then the object it contains.  That's correct, I think - but the bug occurs when you resize and she estimated the size of the bounding box, rather than the size of the object.

    The only solution for the bounding box to work is to zoom in order to have the corners of room bounding box to draw the size of the object.  Alternatively, look at your panel of transformation to manually resize your object.

    Would also report to Adobe so they know that we care about it being fixed: Adobe - feature request/Bug Report Form

  • passing the parameter to bounded taskflow

    jdev 11.1.1.7

    I call a taskflow 1 with parameters as:

    < taskFlow id = "OrgRegistrationTF1".

    taskFlowId="/WEB-INF/OrgRegistrationTF.xml#OrgRegistrationTF".

    Activation = "deferred."

                  xmlns=" http://xmlns.Oracle.com/ADF/controller/binding "> "

    < Parameters >

    < parameter id = "OrgId" value = "#{pageFlowScope.OrgId}" / >

    < / Parameter >

    < / taskFlow >

    Now this taskflow calls internally the taskflow(taskflow 2) another and I need to pass the same parameter that I got while watching taskflow1.

    How can I change the setting to a taskflow which is called from a taskflow?

    Sorry for this question!

    It's simple

    When you set the parameters of taskflow were suppased to be be designated as:

    /Web-INF/OrgRegSubTF.XML

    OrgRegSubTF

    OrgId

    #{pageFlowScope.OrgId}

Maybe you are looking for