LACP or PAGP aggregation of bandwidth

Similar Questions

• LACP. Recommendation of etherchannel, PaGP or static

  Hi all

  Some time ago I have red somewhere that the recommended way to create portchannels is to use the static method 'on' configuration. However, I am not able to find this information. Anyone here have a reference to the recommended method to configure portchannels?

  I found the following document:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/switches/LAN/catalyst6500/IOS/12.2Sx/best/practices/recommendations.html#wp1046803

  This document does not have an explicit statement that the method is preferable. Could someone help me with this please?

  Hi Michael,

  I would stay away from MODE in chanenling, a large part of the time that it leads to the switching loop.

  On the other hand, PAGP/LACP allows dynamically negotionation of etherchannel a being owners and the other open standard. LACP even allows active / standby group of several links and using some of them, but the others are in standby mode incase any member string fails.

  I'm not sure if it is registered anywere you can use on PAgp LACP or Pagp on LACP.

  If the grouping between the cisco devices, so we prefer to use the Pagp as is the owner of cisco.

  Kind regards

  Reem.

• Port of WLC 5508 and 4510 - channels

  LACP and PAgP are not based on the controller and it seems that the 4500 series will use no LAG.

  Interface Port-channel10
  Description Port-Channel WLC
  switchport
  switchport mode trunk
  service-policy input AutoQos - 4.0 - entry-policy
  service-policy output OUTPUT-PRIORITY-POLICE-ETHERCHANNEL

  interface GigabitEthernet3/1

  Cisco 5508 wireless controller description
  switchport mode trunk
  active in mode channel-group 10
  point to point spanning tree-type of link
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet3/2
  Cisco 5508 wireless controller description
  switchport mode trunk
  active in mode channel-group 10
  point to point spanning tree-type of link

  I get the error message "lacp not enabled on the remote port..". I removed the 2nd fiber cable and removed the channel group so I can get the WLC online. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  In order to get the channel of ether to work with the WLC, you must change your configuration of:

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet3/1
  active in mode channel-group 10
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet3/2
  active in mode channel-group 10
  !

  Mode it

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet3/1
  channel-group 10 mode on
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet3/2
  channel-group 10 mode on
  !

  Mode IT is said the switch to Link Aggregation Protocol try and negotiate by using one of two LACP or PAgP control protocols.

  using ONE fits in the configuration guide when you enable the option Cisco WLC LAG.

• Questions of circuits with switches HP BC at base of Cisco

  I saw a few topics on this already posted, some days ago, but I am unable to get my systems to operate in the way that I prefer.  Let me start by saying that I'm not a genius of the network, but I am very familiar with VMware itself.  In my past lives, I asked just a trunk, EtherChannel X # of VLAN and I scored on the vSwitch.  However, because of the cost of equipment Cisco, a new BladeCenter HP c3000 was purchased with GbE2c layer 2/3 Ethernet Blade switches and a group of us here can't understand how best to configure.  I hope that someone here has experience in this area.

  Existing configuration

  Cisco 6509 < = dual Ethernet 1 Gbps w / LACP (active) = > HP GbE2c Blade Switch < = several Configs VLAN = > Blade (i.e. Bay 5)

  Problem

  Whenever a new VLAN is added to the trunk, it must touch every single HP switch to manually add any VLANS.  Takes forever to get the new VLAN.  Also, it is expected that we get the cumulative flow that I don't think that works without groups of circuits from HP (according to my reading).  I could be wrong however.

  Desire

  Configure the HP switch so that it passes all the trunk contents up to the ESXi host and configures port groups only / VLAN tags to the dvSwitch.  Thus whenever definition trunk changes, everything that is needed in ESX is to create the new dvPortGroup.  In addition, they expect aggregation of bandwidth between the uplinks in the dvSwitch.

  Is it possible to reach this configuration?  Hosts run ESXi 4.1.

  P.S. I'm keep simple right now, ultimately I have can I extend that to 10 G ethernet and four or more rising by dvSwitch.

  Hello.

  We also have HP c3000/c7000 with HP GbE2c switches connected to Cisco switches.

  Each new VLAN, I create on Cisco, I have to create this VLAN on HP switches.

  I doubt that it is possible to not do it only once. To do this, HP switches must be member of the Cisco VTP domain, but as I know that HP does not support exclusive Cisco VTP. HP supports a similar protocol called GARP.

  Kind regards

  Ante

• Restricted Inter-VLAN with SG200-26 and SG300-10 routing

  Hi all

  My apologies if this has been covered elsewhere.

  My organization would like to organize a LAN game activity. The installation program I have in mind involves a switch 24 ports to connect all computers in player and saw that the switch connected to a smaller 'core' which has the connected the router and game server. I would like to know if I can put things up as follows...

  SG200-26 with 1 to 24 ports on VLANS separated so they can talk to eachother. I'd then ports 25 and 26 to be a trunk aggregated (for bandwidth and redundancy) port to carry all 24 VLAN more an additional management VLAN (VLAN 100 e.g.) that will be used to access the switch. I want these aggregated trunk ports to connect to a 'core' SG300-10 switch that is connected to the game server and a router for internet access.

  I would like to than the possibility of having two network connections of the server to the switch, one on the management of VLANS and the other on a VLAN different (e.g. 50 VLAN) which will be accessible by players (ports 1-24 of SG200-26). The power switch needs to be able to perform routing inter - VLAN restricted, because it does not VLAN 1-24 of eachother talk but they can talk to VLAN server, but only through specific service ports (e.g. 12345, 12346 port). Is this possible?

  Also how I configure the SG300-10 to enable the VLAN 1-24 of VLAN 50, but not to talk or VLAN 100. So, I will probably have the router on its own LAN VIRTUAL (VLAN 60 ex.) and allow for VLAN 1-24 for access, but only via HTTP port 80 for web access.

  What do you think?

  Thank you.

  Hi Marc, the default gateway of the computers will be the SVI to the switch.

  Router-> couche3-> SG300 layer 2 SG300

  router is 192.168.1.1

  VLAN 1 in 300 SG is 192.168.1.100

  2 VLAN on 300 SG is 192.168.2.1

  SG300 layer 2 has a 1u, 2 t trunk.

  My computer to connect to an access port 2 unidentified on the layer 2 SG300.

  I am able to ping 192.168.2.1

  I am able to ping 192.168.1.100

  I can not 192.168.1.1 pnig

  The reason is that the router has no idea on this subnet so cannot send the package to the source 192.168.2.x subnet.

  The ACL and the basic connection are 2 different animals. The ACL is to prevent intervlan communication. The basic connection must be tags trunk and vlan or static routes.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• WLC 4402 redundant link

  We have a WLC, currently it has a trunk single link in a 6506 and everything works fine.

  We've recently updated this network to the VSS system, so now we have two 6506, I want to connect the redundant port 4402 on the new switch, is there something special I need to do?

  as is a virtual switch that it should connect, does anyone know if WLC is capable of etherchannel or something similar?

  Thank you very much

  WLC called "LAG", but that's about the same. You can simply enable LAG or turn it off on the side of WLC. When activated, it will offer all of its ports. On the side of the switch that you need to configure "mode" on the portchannel, which means that the WLC is not compatible lacp or pagp.

  Nicolas

• redundancy switch

  Hello, I have two layer 2 switches. My requirement is to provide a fully redundant LAN. That means that PC is connected with a switch in case of failure of their connection will have all the time means that they will connect with any other switch to keep communicating through LAN. Please can someone suggest me an architecture that suits to draw CISCO packet.

  Good question, Leo.

  The best way is to have at least two nic card on your PC (with the same speed). with etherchannel, you can bring it to two different switch.

  Note that in Etherchannel, you have LACP and PAGP. LACP is good when you go on two different switches. two interconnect your switches, you can use the cable port or trunk right between the two switches.

• VMware syslog collector

  After you have configured remote syslog collector, I see only one type of log file as syslog.log for all ESXi hosts.

  What every newspaper he holds usually check if the logs locally on an ESXi we are looking for hostd.log, vmkernel.log, vmkwarning.log and so on?

  So, where are all these newspapers in syslog.log ending remotely?

  Yes it is to combine your logs in the syslog.log file that you look for each host.

  I can confirm from a glance at the mine-

  to d

  vpxa

  vmkernal

  pass

  FDM

  vmkwarning

  rhttpproxy

  snmpd

  spend-probe

  I also looked for the same document you have exploded this information in the past.  This indicates that all the log files are included.

  "To preserve newspapers more, ESXi can be configured to place these log files in a location of alternative storage disk and send the logs on the network to a syslog server."

  -----

  VMware KB: Location of ESXi 5.1 and 5.5 log files

  ESXi host 5.1 log files

  A 5.1 ESXi host logs are grouped according to the source component:

  • /var/log/auth.log: Shell ESXi authentication success and failure.
  • /var/log/dhclient.log: DHCP service to customers, including discovery, rental of addresses applications and renewals.
  • /var/log/esxupdate.log: ESXi Setup patch and update logs.
  • /var/log/lacp.log: Link Aggregation Control Protocol to connect.
  • /var/log/hostd.log: Organize the management of maintenance records, including VM and host of task and events, communication with the Client vSphere and vCenter Server vpxa and connections SDK agent.
  • /var/log/hostd-probe.log: Reactivity of host management service auditor.
  • /var/log/rhttpproxy.log: Connections HTTP proxy on behalf of other webservices to ESXi host.
  • /var/log/shell.log: ESXi Shell, including toggle usage logs and each command is entered. For more information, seecommand-line vSphere 5.5 Documentation and audit ESXi Shell connections and controls in ESXi 5.x (2004810).
  • /var/log/sysboot.log: Beginning VMkernel startup and module loading.
  • /var/log/boot.gz: a compressed file that contains the information of the newspaper to start and can be read with zcat var/log/boot.gz|more.
  • /var/log/syslog.log: Initialization of the service management, watchdogs, the scheduled tasks and DCUI use.
  • /var/log/usb.log: Events of peripheral USB arbitration, such as the discovery and transmission to the virtual machines.
  • /var/log/vobd.log: Similar to VMkernel Observation eventsvob.component.event.
  • /var/log/vmkernel.log: Core VMkernel logs, including starting the virtual machine, storage and device networking and events of the driver and the discovery.
  • /var/log/vmkwarning.log: A summary of the messages of warning and alert the journal extracted the VMkernel logs.
  • /var/log/vmksummary.log: A summary of ESXi host start and stop and a time pulse with availability, number of virtual machines running and services of consumption of resources. For more information, see Format of the logfile vmksummary ESXi 5.0 (2004566).
  • /var/log/Xorg.log: Video acceleration.

  ------

  VMware KB: Configure syslog on ESXi 5.x and 6.0

  VMware vSphere, ESXi 5.x and 6.0 hosts running a syslog service ( vmsyslogd ) that provides one mechanism standard for the recording of the VMkernel messages and other system components. In ESXi, by default these log files is placed on a local volume scratch or a virtual disk. To preserve newspapers more, ESXi can be configured to put these log files in a location of alternative storage disk and send the logs on the network to a syslog server.

  Retention, rotation and splitting the logs received and managed by a syslog server are fully controlled by this syslog server. ESXi 5.x and 6.0 can not configure or control the management of newspapers to a remote syslog server. For more information, see the documentation for the syslog server.

  Regardless of the specified additional syslog configuration using these options, newspapers continue to be placed on the default locations on the ESXi host. For more information, see location of ESXi 3.5 - 4.1 log files (1021801).

  A previous version of vSphere, ESXi are configured differently. For more information, see Enabling syslog on ESXi 3.5 and 4.x (1016621).

  If vSphere Syslog Collector will be used to receive logs of ESXi hosts, see Install or Upgrade vSphere Syslog Collector in Guide of installation and Installation of vSphere.

• Migrating from a distributed virtual switch pass

  I have a cluster that is approved for business-more.  I would like the host to a distributed switch.  The configuration of the virtual switch is as follows:

  4 NICs connected to a host, the NIC are part of an EtherChannel.  The network adapters are teamed up with ip route based on the hash of the IP.  All network adapters are connected to the same vSwitch with port groups created for access to the different VLANS

  I did the following to try to migrate to the new distributed switch: I broke the EtherChannel and removed three network adapters on the virtual switch and assigns them to the distributed switch.  At the same time grouping NETWORK adapters on the virtual channel switch based on the originating virtual, we changed the port ID.  I then migrated the service console more for the new switch successfully distributed.  I have created groups of ports on the virtual switch.

  The question is when I re - create the EtherChannel falls hosts on the network.  I have noted the following: "see attachment".

  Anyone using EtherChannel with distributed switches?

  Any help would be appreciated...

  How to configure etherchannel on your Cisco switch? You may not use LACP or PAgP. You must use "channel-group mode on.

• LACP SG200 - 08 double speed ethernet when two aggregation of links Mac it

  Hi guys, I use a mac mini and imac with 2 Thunderbolt ethernet adapter to make the aggregation of links on a SG200-08.

  To copy the files of drivers from the mac mini raid0 stroke, the speed of the network can reach 225 MB/S, but the actual speed of the disk drive is only 107 MB/S

  I mean that the two ports in each mac carry only the same data over time. Can he do a given separate two and carry on two ports?

  I can find use VLAN or else combine two IPs for one?

  Don't know how yo SG200-08 GUI web definition (this is my first time using the smart switch)

  Hi Yang, your computer supports a load such as link aggregation/LACP 802.3ad balance method? You can effectively double the data rates without a nic-team aggregation technology or link any.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Reference Dell M1000e + aggregator MI/O port mapping

  Hi all

  I intend to install a new chassis Dell M1000e with Dell M/o aggregator. During the time of solution, I have a few questions about correspondences between the physical uplink with NDC blade ports ports. A Please check the config below and specify my queries?

  My hardware:

  • 1 x Dell M1000e
  • 2 x M i/o aggregator (A1 & A2)
  • 16 x M630 Blade (Qlogic 57840 S ANC four ports card)

  Reference DELL M/o aggregator:

  (reserved for Future use) module QSFP + 2 ports (Port No1:33 - 36 & No2:37 Port-40)

  I want to use these two modules for my blades 4-port Quad and the confusion I had, how to associate these 16 ports (8 ports of each module) to the server blade and the amount of bandwidth I will get by blade with redundancy.

  Module 4-port SFP + 10 GbE (Flexi-O of the Bay) (Port No.: 41-48)

  Module 4-port 2/4/8 Gb FC FlexIO (Flexi Bay 1) (Port No.: 49-56)

  FYI - I would like to install ESXi 6.0 on all blades

  Thank you!!

  Vinay

  Oriented server ports are configured automatically as part of the aggregation of links groups if the server is configured for the LACP Protocol. Static GAL is not supported.

  You will use the segregation network VLAN. A VLAN for network traffic and the other for the CF. Here are the commands to configure interfaces for different VLANS.

  Unidentified:

  Dell (conf) # tengigabit interface 0/16

  Dell(conf-if-te-0/16) # vlan unidentified 4

  Output Dell(conf-if-te-0/16) #.

  Tag:

  Dell (conf) # tengigabit interface 0/16

  The tag vlan Dell(conf-if-te-0/16) # 4

  Output Dell(conf-if-te-0/16) #.

  Traffic from servers will follow the path of the VLAN. For example, if an internal server, facing the port is set to VLAN 4, that traffic will be transmitted on the uplink port which has also set to VLAN 4.

  By default, all external ports are placed in a single whole LAG. However, you can change the configuration to support several shifts of uplink. Page 159 of guys configuration takes you step by step on setting up several shifts of uplink.

  The aggregator automatically configures to match the FCoE parameters used in the switches to which it connects through its uplink ports. FIP snooping is automatically configured on an aggregator. Automatically configured port channel (LAG 128) works CWF port mode. See page 86 for more information and examples of config.

  For redundancy, you could stack the units together. 241 page details the process of stacking.

  Page 54 of 102 of the Guide blade IO has one other diagram that details more internal server port mapping for each blade.

• GAL/LACP with several VIRTUAL LANs

  Hello

  I have two switches SG-200-50. I created three VLANS on one and define the place of the other - there is no requirement for routing between VIRTUAL LANs. However, I want to trunk between local networks VIRTUAL using with LACP LAG. For example, A button 1-22 ports VLAN 1 and then 23-24 is the junction for this. 25-34 is VLAN2 and trunking is 35-36. VLAN 3 is 37-48 and 49-50 trunking. I seemed to be able to get 1 VLAN, the default, trunking but no VLAN 2.

  I have a few questions:

  1. the SG-200 will allow you to the trunk several VIRTUAL LANs for another switch?

  2. If so - how? I've lived the documentation and it does not mention explicitly "multiple" VLAN with DELAY.

  3 circuits is possible by a LAG (say 6 ports) happening all the VLANS on the switch?

  So the main question is that I want to achieve is possible on this switch. The reason why I'm doing it is of course of redundancy. Carrying one VLAN on both switches is preferable. I just need trunk correctly between them.

  See you soon! Any thoughts appreciated.

  Scott

  Hi Scott,.

  You had questions, which I copied in red. :

  1. the SG-200 will allow you to the trunk several VIRTUAL LANs for another switch?  Absolutely

  2. If so - how? I've lived the documentation and it does not mention explicitly "multiple" VLAN with DELAY.

  I have attached the Administrator's guide.  The OFFSET rules are defined at the bottom of page 82 of the attached document.

  The 200 series supports four lags, or in other words four groups aggregagted of links.

  3 circuits is possible by a LAG (say 6 ports) happening all the VLANS on the switch?  Yes as indicates it page 83 administrator guide.

  Assign up to eight ports active members to the static LAG.

  So the main question is that I want to achieve is possible on this switch. The reason why I'm doing it is of course of redundancy. Carrying one VLAN on both switches is preferable. I just need trunk correctly between them.

  Personally, I prefer to the trunk on gal differently, especially when you are trying only to achieve redundancy and higher aggregate bandwidth between switches.  It is also relevant to the 300 series as the product of the 300 series is just a richer product.

  You want; "I want to trunk between local networks VIRTUAL using with LACP LAG. For example, A button 1-22 ports VLAN 1 and then 23-24 is the junction for this. 25-34 is VLAN2 and trunking is 35-36. VLAN 3 is 37-48 and 49-50 trunking. It seemed to me be able to obtain VLAN 1, the default value, trunking but no VLAN 2. »

  What about using the ports numbers higher for the uplink between switches, I have no particular reason to use these ports except that they are on the right side of the switch.

  A B switch

  ports ports

  VLAN 1 1-24, 47-48 1-24, 47-48

  VLAN2 25-34, 25-34

  vlan3 35-46 35-46

  LAG ports 49-50 49-50

  The advantage of this is that now you have two ports of the traffic load balancing between switches of series two 200.  I could have more if I want, but I want to keep my simple example.

  Create a static OFFSET, by the sound of it you did already.

  I just used my 300 series switch (SF300 - 48P) as a demo, as I don't have a series 200 switch.  Configuration should be roughly about the same.  In my case, I have four ports GiG GE1 to GE4.  I will use GE1 and GE2 as my two members of a group LAG 1.  May sound a bit confusing, but follow below.

  Added two ports for the DELAY, note in the example below GE1 and GE2 are not connected to another switch, so they showup as ports of Eve;

  Also my 300 series switch supports eight groups of LAG, so captures the numbers 1 to 8 as shown in the following screen.

  

  Now that my LAG is created, you'll notice in the screenshot below that VLAN1 is added automatically to the LAG 1 as unmarked frames.

  Note: circled point, I selected LAG in this menu drop-down and then click Go.

  Note: 1 in the Red rectangular box represents GAL Group 1, which consists of GE1 and GE2

  

  Now, I add 2 VLAN group LAG 1 by selecting 2 VLAN selected then LAG and then click go, the following screen came.

  

  I clicked on the button marked radio in the rectangle above, to allow VLAN 2 send labeled on group GAL 1 ethernet frames.

  And so on for the other VLANS I migth.

  My methodology or train of thought, was to allow of vlan1 to just send frames unmarked on the Group LAG 1, but any other VLAN later is marked on the Group 1 GAL.

  You should be able to do exactly the same thing on the other switch 200 series.

  in my example, as I then simply take some CAT6 or CAT5e cables and connect GE1 on a 200 series switch to other Ge1 200 series

  I connect then GE2 on a 200 series switch to other Ge2 200 series.

  Now I have the aggregation of links and balancing working between switches.

  Hope this helps

  Best regards, Dave

• LACP using the 2 x 10G ports does not appear 20G?

  I currently have etherchannel configured 2 x 10g ports.

  Cat_6509 #sh run int ten8/1
  Building configuration...

  Current configuration: 156 bytes
  !
  interface TenGigabitEthernet8/1
  switchport
  switchport mode trunk
  desirable mode of channel-group 42
  end

  Cat_6509 #sh run ten9/1 int
  Building configuration...

  Current configuration: 156 bytes
  !
  interface TenGigabitEthernet9/1
  switchport
  switchport mode trunk
  desirable mode of channel-group 42
  end

  Cat_6509 #.

  Cat_6509 #sh int t8/1
  TenGigabitEthernet8/1 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
  The hardware is C6k 10000 MB 802.3, address is fc99.4736.a2f0 (bia fc99.4736.a2f0)
  Description: 10 Gig GEC to MADDC (VLAN split)
  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec,
  reliability 255/255, txload 5/255, rxload 1/255
  Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
  KeepAlive set (10 sec)
  Full-duplex, 10 Gb/s
  !
  Cat_6509 #sh int t9/1
  TenGigabitEthernet9/1 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
  The hardware is C6k 10000 MB 802.3, address is fc99.4736.a238 (bia fc99.4736.a238)
  Description: 10 Gig GEC to MADDC (VLAN split)
  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec,
  reliability 255/255, txload 8/255, rxload 1/255
  Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
  KeepAlive set (10 sec)
  Full-duplex, 10 Gb/s
  !
  Cat_6509 #sh int po42
  Port-channel42's up, line protocol is in place (tied)
  Material is EtherChannel, address is fc99.4736.a2f0 (bia fc99.4736.a2f0)
  Description: 10 Gig GEC to MADDC (VLAN split)
  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 20000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec,
  reliability 255/255, txload 7/255, rxload 1/255
  Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
  KeepAlive set (10 sec)
  Full-duplex, 10 Gb/s< should="" this="" be="" 20gb="" if="" the="" ports="" are="">

  Cat_6509 #show etherchannel 42 summary
  Flags: - Low P - D bundled in port-channel
  I have - autonomous s - suspended
  H Eve (LACP only)
  R - Layer 3 S - Layer2
  U - N running - is not in service, no aggregation
  f cannot allocate an aggregator

  M not in use, no aggregation due to minimum links has not met
  m don't use, port do not associate due to not meeting minimum links
  u - unfit to tied selling
  d default port

  w waiting to be aggregated
  Number of channels in use: 28
  Number of aggregators: 28

  Protocol for the Port-Channel port group
  ------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------
  Po42 42 PAgP Te8/1 (P) (SU) Te9/1 (P)

  Last applied Hash Algorithm of Distribution: fixed

  Cat_6509 #.

  Thank you

  ST

  Found this.  Does that help?

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/discussion/11494901/fabric-interconnect-uplink-port-channeling

• X 8 Dual Gigabit Ethernet Port Aggregation easily explained?

  Can you explain what that means?

  • Dual Gigabit Ethernet Port Aggregation

  In a totally non savy way

  @careyjames LACP is not available in AP mode.

• Does Windows natively support the aggregation of links?

  There are some descriptions on the aggregation of links in Wikipedia.

  http://en.Wikipedia.org/wiki/Link_aggregation

  "Note that Microsoft Windows does support not natively the aggregation of links (at least until Windows Server 2008)."

  I was wondering if this description is accurate? And what about the new windows operating system, such as Windows Server 2012 edition?

  Windows xp, Windows 7 and Windows 8 natively supports the aggregation of links? If the answer if not, anyone know why? I know, Linux and other operating systems support the aggregation of links.

  Hi, Peacegump,

  For NIC teaming or link aggregation support, you will need to contact your provider network adapter or an OEM (for example, Dell offers a driver of consolidation).  They provide you with a driver that allows the grouping of NETWORK adapters, because Windows does not offer this feature in the core of the operating system.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/winserverPN/thread/f200b747-d9fb-4632-b6a4-aaf89c3dcc9b

  Grouping network adapter and clustered servers

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/254101

  How to use matching with Advanced Networking Services (YEARS)?

  http://www.Intel.com/support/network/sb/CS-009747.htm

  Windows 7 - aggregation of links to double bandwidth: 2 p., 2 network cards of each

  http://www.SevenForums.com/network-sharing/124720-link-aggregation-bandwidth-doubling-2pcs-2-NICs-each.html

  If you need more information, transfer your question on the Forum on TechNet.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/winserverPN/threads