LAN-to-LAN tunnel between VPN 3000 and Cisco 1721

Hello

I have a current LAN-to-LAN tunnel configuration between VPN 3000 (3.6) and Cisco 1721 (12.2 (11) T).

When I use the encryption = authentication and Des-56 = ESP\MD5\HMAC-128 for the IPSec Security Association, everything works fine.

However, I would like to Turn off encryption for some time getting the speed improvements, so I changed

Encryption = null esp (in 1721) and to "null" in VPN-3000.

Now the tunnel is setup but I can spend only ICMP traffic. When I pass the traffic UDP\TCP the message below appears the Cisco 1721

% C1700_EM-1-ERROR: error in packet-rx: pad size error, id 75, hen offset 0

Has anyone seen this behavior?

All those put in place an IPSec Tunnel with only the ESP authentication and NO encryption between VPN-3000 and Cisco 1721?

Thanx------Naman

Naman,

Disable you the vpn Accelerator? "no accel crypto engine. Sure that you can't do with a null module vpn.

Kurtis Durrett

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • LAN to Lan tunnel between ASA 5505 and 3030.

    I am unable to build a tunnel vpn site-to-site between an ASA 5505 and our Cisco 3030.  I tried all possible combinations except one that will work.  I am able to ping each peer on the other site.  Someone at - it a config between two tunnels of Lan to Lan to work between a 5505 and 3030 that works.  Thank you

    Hello

    Please visit this link using config:

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/VPN-3000-series-conce...

    Kind regards

    Aditya

    Please evaluate the useful messages.

  • NAT via LAN-to-LAN configuration between router IOS and Cisco VPN 3000

    Hello

    I have the following document on the creation of a virtual LAN2LAN including NAT private network.

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2284/products_configuration_example09186a00801ae24c.shtml

    It? s easily do this with the hub. Now, I have to set it up on the IOS router, and for this purpose, I can? t find any information. NAT, I have my private network to a single IP address that must be by tunnel as my local network official.

    Anyone have documentation on this szenario? I can? t is not on the OCC.

    Thanks for the support

    Hello.

    Concentrators are very friendly units (IMHO) to VPN with NAT and VPN.

    You build an acl defined traffic over the vpn (110) based on the nat wouldn't

    You create an acl to set what is NAT had (111) and create a NAT statement accordingly

    Here is an example configuration.

    !

    crypto ISAKMP policy 10

    BA 3des

    md5 hash

    preshared authentication

    Group 2

    vpnsrock crypto isakmp key! address x.x.x.x

    !

    !

    Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-SHA-ESP-3DES-3des esp-sha-hmac

    !

    10 VPN ipsec-isakmp crypto map

    defined peer x.x.x.x

    game of transformation-ESP-3DES-SHA

    match address 110

    !

    interface Fa0

    NAT outside IP

    VPN crypto card

    !

    !

    interface fa1

    IP nat inside

    !

    IP nat inside source list 111 interface fa0 overload

    IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 y.y.y.y

    access-list 110 permit ip fa0 - ip network-remote control-generic generic-mask

    access-list 111 allow local-network ip network-remote control-generic generic-mask

    !

  • Help with a VPN tunnel between ASA 5510 and Juniper SSG20

    Hello

    We have a customer wanting to configure a VPN Site to Site tunnel between a new purchased 5510 of ASA located in his direction with its Juniper SSG20 Office, located in the main office. We contacted HP and they send us a Cisco professional to do the job.

    After 2 days from 16:00 to 22:00 and error and countless hours of research online and nunerous calls, we are still unable to get traffic from the network of agencies to enter the tunnel.

    Main branch
    1.1.1.2                                 1.1.1.1
    -----                                               -----------
    192.168.8.0/24 | ASA|-----------------------------------| Juniper |    192.168.1.0/24
    -----                                               -----------
    192.168.8.254 192.168.1.254

    According to Cisco professionals, the tunnel is now in place but no traffic through. We are unable to ping anything on the network on the other side (192.168.1.0/24). We receive timeout ping all the time. The Cisco professional told us it's a routing or NAT problem and he's working on a solution!

    Through research, I came across a post on Experts-Exchange (here) [the 1st comment on the original post] which States "...". that both sides of the VPN must have a different class of LAN for the VPN to work... " Would that be our problem?

    It has become a critical issue to the point that he had to replace the Cisco ASA with a temporary Juniper SSG5 on another subnet (192.168.7.0/24) to get the tunnel upward and through traffic until the ASA VPN issue is resolved and I didn't need to say that the client is killing us!

    Help is very appreciated.

    Thank you

    1. Yes, ping package from the interface of the ASA is considered valuable traffic to the LAN of Juniper.

    SAA, need you traffic from the interface source ASA's private, because interesting to determine by crypto ACL MYLIST traffic between 192.168.8.0/24 and 192.168.1.0/24.

    You will also need to add the following configuration to be able to get the ping of the interface of the ASA:

    management-private access

    To initiate the ping of the private interface ASA:

    ping 192.168.1.254 private

    2. the default time before the next generation of new key is normally 28800 seconds, and if there is no interesting traffic flowing between 2 subnets, he'll tear the VPN tunnel down. As soon as there is interesting traffic, the VPN tunnel will be built automatically into the next generation of new key. However, if there is traffic before generating a new key, the new tunnel will be established, and VPN tunnel will remain standing and continue encrypt and decrypt traffic.

    Currently, your configuration has been defined with ITS lifetime of 3600 seconds GOLD / 4608000 kilobytes of traffic before the next generate a new key (it will be either 3600 seconds, or 4608000 kilobytes period expires first). You can certainly change it by default to 28800 seconds without configuring kilobytes. SA life is negotiated between the ASA and Juniper, and whatever is the lowest value will be used.

    Hope that helps.

  • LAN-to-Lan tunnel between three ASA/PIX

    Hi guys,.

    I need help to solve a problem I had.

    Here is the topology, I hope you can see what it says.

    I have lan-to-lan VPN of ASA #1 à #3 of PIX and ASA #2

    We now have access to the ASA #2 to PIX n ° 3 network.

    How can I fix this in the most simple.

    We do not want a tunneln between ASA #2 and #3 of PIX. We already did that, but the connection was horrible.

    ASA #1 and #2 of ASA are located in China, and PIX is in Sweden.

    the uses of the ISP ASA #2 struggled with their line in Sweden.

    Thanks in advance!

    It is easy to achieve. You must configure three things:

    (1) allow same-security-traffic intra-interface on ASA1

    (2) extend the crypto-ACL on all devices:

    ASA2 to ASA1:

    10.10.30.0 to 10.10.20.0 (already there)

    10.10.30.0 to 10.10.10.0

    PIX3 to ASA1:

    10.10.10.0 to 10.10.20.0 (already there)

    10.10.10.0 to 10.10.30.0

    ASA1 with the ASA2:

    10.10.20.0 to 10.10.30.0 (already there)

    10.10.10.0 to 10.10.30.0

    ASA1 to PIX3:

    10.10.20.0 to 10.10.10.0 (already there)

    10.10.30.0 to 10.10.10.0

    (3) configure the NAT Excemption on ASA1 that this traffic will be natted as you did for the existing VPN traffic.

    --
    Don't stop once you have upgraded your network! Improve the world by lending money to low-income workers:
    http://www.Kiva.org/invitedBy/karsteni

  • PPTP VPN between clients Windows and Cisco 2921 router

    Hi all!

    I have a problem with PPTP VPN between Windows clients and router Cisco 2921 with permission of RADIUS (IAS). When I try to connect to Cisco 2921 of Windows 7 by using MS-CHAP v2 I get the message 778: it was not possible to verify the identity of the server. Can I use PAP - power is OK. On Windows XP, the same situation.

    Cisco config:

    version 15.0

    horodateurs service debug datetime msec

    Log service timestamps datetime msec

    encryption password service

    !

    hostname gw.izmv

    !

    boot-start-marker

    boot-end-marker

    !

    logging buffered 51200 warnings

    !

    AAA new-model

    !

    AAA authentication ppp default local radius group of

    !

    AAA - the id of the joint session

    !

    clock timezone + 002 2

    !

    No ipv6 cef

    IP source-route

    IP cef

    !

    !

    Authenticated MultiLink bundle-name Panel

    !

    Async-bootp Server dns 192.168.192.XX

    VPDN enable

    !

    VPDN-Group 1

    ! PPTP by default VPDN group

    accept-dialin

    Pptp Protocol

    virtual-model 1

    echo tunnel PPTP 10

    tunnel L2TP non-session timeout 15

    PMTU IP

    adjusting IP mtu

    !

    redundancy

    !

    interface Loopback0

    IP 192.168.207.1 255.255.255.0

    !

    !

    interface GigabitEthernet0/0

    Description $ETH-LAN$$ETH-SW-LAUNCH$$INTF-INFO-GE $ 0/0

    IP 192.168.192.XXX 255.255.255.0

    IP 192.168.192.XX 255.255.255.0 secondary

    IP nat inside

    IP virtual-reassembly

    automatic duplex

    automatic speed

    !

    !

    interface GigabitEthernet0/1

    no ip address

    Shutdown

    automatic duplex

    automatic speed

    !

    !

    interface GigabitEthernet0/2

    Description - Inet-

    no ip address

    NAT outside IP

    IP virtual-reassembly

    automatic duplex

    automatic speed

    PPPoE enable global group

    PPPoE-client dial-pool-number 1

    No cdp enable

    !

    !

    interface virtual-Template1

    IP unnumbered Loopback0

    IP mtu 1492

    IP virtual-reassembly

    AutoDetect encapsulation ppp

    by default PPP peer ip address pool

    PPP mppe auto encryption required

    PPP authentication ms-chap-v2

    !

    !

    interface Dialer1

    the negotiated IP address

    NAT outside IP

    IP virtual-reassembly

    encapsulation ppp

    Dialer pool 1

    Dialer-Group 1

    PPP authentication pap callin

    PPP pap sent-username DSLUSERNAME password DSLPASSWORD

    No cdp enable

    !

    !

    IP local pool PPP 192.168.207.200 192.168.207.250

    IP forward-Protocol ND

    !

    !

    overload of IP nat inside source list NAT_ACL interface Dialer1

    IP nat inside source static tcp 192.168.192.XX 25 expandable 25 82.XXX.XXX.XXX

    IP nat inside source static tcp 192.168.192.XX 1352 82.XXX.XXX.XXX 1352 extensible

    IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1

    !

    NAT_ACL extended IP access list

    deny ip 192.168.192.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.YYY.0 0.0.0.255

    deny ip 192.168.192.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.YYY.0 0.0.0.255

    deny ip 192.168.192.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.YYY.0 0.0.0.255

    deny ip 192.168.192.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.YYY.0 0.0.0.255

    permit tcp 192.168.192.0 0.0.0.255 any eq www

    permit tcp 192.168.192.0 0.0.0.255 any eq 443

    permit tcp 192.168.192.0 0.0.0.255 any eq 1352

    permit tcp host 192.168.192.XX no matter what eq smtp

    permit tcp 192.168.192.0 0.0.0.255 any eq 22

    permit tcp host 192.168.192.XX no matter what eq field

    permit tcp host 192.168.192.XX no matter what eq field

    permit tcp host 192.168.192.XX no matter what eq field

    allowed UDP host 192.168.192.XX matter what eq field

    allowed UDP host 192.168.192.XX matter what eq field

    allowed UDP host 192.168.192.XX matter what eq field

    !

    host 192.168.192.XX auth-port 1645 1646 RADIUS server acct-port

    Server RADIUS IASKEY key

    !

    control plan

    !

    !

    !

    Line con 0

    line to 0

    line vty 0 4

    line vty 5 15

    !

    Scheduler allocate 20000 1000

    end

    Debugging is followed:

    14:47:51.755 on 21 oct: PPP: Alloc context [294C7BC4]

    14:47:51.755 on 21 oct: ppp98 PPP: Phase is

    14:47:51.755 on 21 oct: ppp98 PPP: using AAA Id Unique = 8 b

    14:47:51.755 on 21 oct: ppp98 PPP: permission NOT required

    14:47:51.755 on 21 oct: ppp98 PPP: via vpn, set the direction of the call

    14:47:51.755 on 21 oct: ppp98 PPP: treatment of connection as a callin

    14:47:51.755 on 21 oct: ppp98 PPP: Session Session handle [62] id [98]

    14:47:51.755 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: State of the event [OPEN] [initial check]

    14:47:51.755 on 21 oct: ppp98 PPP LCP: switch to passive mode, State [stopped]

    14:47:53.759 on 21 oct: ppp98 PPP LCP: exit passive mode, State [departure]

    14:47:53.759 on 21 oct: LCP ppp98: O CONFREQ [departure] id 1 len 19

    14:47:53.759 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: MRU 1464 (0x010405B8)

    14:47:53.759 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: AuthProto MS-CHAP-V2 (0x0305C22381)

    14:47:53.759 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: MagicNumber 0xF018D237 (0x0506F018D237)

    14:47:53.759 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: event [UP] State [departure at REQsent]

    14:47:54.351 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: I CONFREQ [REQsent] id 0 len 18

    14:47:54.351 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: MRU 1400 (0 x 01040578)

    14:47:54.351 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: MagicNumber 0x2F7C5F7E (0x05062F7C5F7E)

    14:47:54.351 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: PFC (0 x 0702)

    14:47:54.351 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: RAC (0 x 0802)

    14:47:54.351 on 21 oct: LCP ppp98: O CONFNAK [REQsent] id 0 len 8

    14:47:54.351 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: MRU 1464 (0x010405B8)

    14:47:54.351 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: State of the event [receive ConfReq-] [REQsent to REQsent]

    14:47:54.751 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: I CONFACK [REQsent] id 1 len 19

    14:47:54.751 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: MRU 1464 (0x010405B8)

    14:47:54.751 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: AuthProto MS-CHAP-V2 (0x0305C22381)

    14:47:54.751 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: MagicNumber 0xF018D237 (0x0506F018D237)

    14:47:54.751 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: State of the event [receive ConfAck] [REQsent to ACKrcvd]

    14:47:54.915 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: I CONFREQ [ACKrcvd] id 1 len 18

    14:47:54.915 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: MRU 1400 (0 x 01040578)

    14:47:54.915 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: MagicNumber 0x2F7C5F7E (0x05062F7C5F7E)

    14:47:54.915 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: PFC (0 x 0702)

    14:47:54.915 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: RAC (0 x 0802)

    14:47:54.915 on 21 oct: LCP ppp98: O CONFNAK [ACKrcvd] id 1 len 8

    14:47:54.915 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: MRU 1464 (0x010405B8)

    14:47:54.915 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: State of the event [receive ConfReq-] [ACKrcvd to ACKrcvd]

    14:47:55.275 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: I CONFREQ [ACKrcvd] id 2 len 18

    14:47:55.275 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: MRU 1464 (0x010405B8)

    14:47:55.275 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: MagicNumber 0x2F7C5F7E (0x05062F7C5F7E)

    14:47:55.275 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: PFC (0 x 0702)

    14:47:55.275 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: RAC (0 x 0802)

    14:47:55.275 on 21 oct: LCP ppp98: O CONFACK [ACKrcvd] id 2 len 18

    14:47:55.275 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: MRU 1464 (0x010405B8)

    14:47:55.275 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: MagicNumber 0x2F7C5F7E (0x05062F7C5F7E)

    14:47:55.275 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: PFC (0 x 0702)

    14:47:55.275 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: RAC (0 x 0802)

    14:47:55.275 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: State of the event [receive ConfReq +] [ACKrcvd to open]

    14:47:55.295 on 21 oct: ppp98 PPP: Phase is AUTHENTICATING,

    14:47:55.295 on 21 oct: ppp98 MS-CHAP-V2: O CHALLENGE id 1 len 28 of 'gw.izmv '.

    14:47:55.295 on 21 oct: ppp98 TPIF: State is open

    14:47:55.583 on 21 oct: ppp98 MS-CHAP-V2: I ANSWER id 1 len 71 of "domain\username".

    14:47:55.583 on 21 oct: ppp98 PPP: Phase TRANSFER, tempting with impatience

    14:47:55.583 on 21 oct: ppp98 PPP: Phase is AUTHENTICATING, unauthenticated user

    14:47:55.587 on 21 oct: ppp98 PPP: request sent MSCHAP_V2 LOGIN

    14:47:55.591 on 21 oct: ppp98 PPP: received LOGIN response PASS

    14:47:55.591 on 21 oct: ppp98 PPP AUTHOR: author data NOT available

    14:47:55.591 on 21 oct: ppp98 PPP: Phase TRANSFER, tempting with impatience

    14:47:55.595 on 21 oct: Vi3 PPP: Phase is AUTHENTICATING, authenticated user

    14:47:55.595 on 21 oct: Vi3: given msg No. MS_CHAP_V2

    14:47:55.595 on 21 oct: Vi3 MS-CHAP-V2: SUCCESS O id 1 len 46 msg is "tG @ #QDD @(@B@ (@[email protected]/ ** / @I @:[email protected]/ ** / @@@ EJFDE)).

    14:47:55.595 on 21 oct: Vi3 PPP: Phase is in PLACE

    14:47:55.595 on 21 oct: Vi3 CPIW: protocol configured, start state cf. [original]

    14:47:55.595 on 21 oct: Vi3 CPIW: State of the event [OPEN] [Initial report on startup]

    14:47:55.595 on 21 oct: Vi3 CPIW: O CONFREQ [departure] id 1 len 10

    14:47:55.595 on 21 oct: Vi3 CPIW: address of 192.168.207.1 (0x0306C0A8CF01)

    14:47:55.595 on 21 oct: Vi3 CPIW: event [UP] State [begins to REQsent]

    14:47:55.595 on 21 oct: Vi3 CCP: protocol configured, start state cf. [original]

    14:47:55.595 on 21 oct: Vi3 CCP: State of the event [OPEN] [Initial report on startup]

    14:47:55.595 on 21 oct: Vi3 CCP: O CONFREQ [departure] id 1 len 10

    14:47:55.595 on 21 oct: Vi3 CCP: MS - PPC supported bits 0 x 01000060 (0 x 120601000060)

    14:47:55.595 on 21 oct: Vi3 CCP: event [UP] State [begins to REQsent]

    14:47:55.599 on 21 oct: % LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface virtual-access.3, changed State to

    14:47:55.603 on 21 oct: % LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface virtual-access.3, changed State to

    14:47:56.027 on 21 oct: Vi3 LCP: I have TERMREQ [open] id 3 len 16

    14:47:56.027 on 21 oct: Vi3 LCP: (0x2F7C5F7E003CCD740000030A)

    14:47:56.027 on 21 oct: Vi3 CPIW: event [BOTTOM] State [REQsent on startup]

    14:47:56.027 on 21 oct: Vi3 CPIW: State of event [CLOSE] [begins with initial]

    14:47:56.027 on 21 oct: Vi3 CCP: event [BOTTOM] State [REQsent on startup]

    14:47:56.027 on 21 oct: Vi3 PPP DISC: MPPE required not negotiated

    14:47:56.027 on 21 oct: Vi3 PPP: sending Acct event [low] id [8B]

    14:47:56.027 on 21 oct: Vi3 CCP: State of event [CLOSE] [start with initial]

    14:47:56.027 on 21 oct: Vi3 LCP: O TERMACK [open] id 3 len 4

    14:47:56.027 on 21 oct: Vi3 LCP: event [receive TermReq] State [Open to stop]

    14:47:56.027 on 21 oct: Vi3 PPP: Phase ENDS

    14:47:56.027 on 21 oct: Vi3 LCP: event [CLOSE] [off status of closing]

    14:47:56.675 on 21 oct: Vi3 PPP: block vaccess to be released [0x10]

    14:47:56.675 on 21 oct: Vi3 LCP: event [CLOSE] State [closing closing]

    14:47:56.679 on 21 oct: Vi3 LCP: event [BOTTOM] State [closing on Initial]

    14:47:56.679 on 21 oct: Vi3 PPP: compensation AAA Id Unique = 8 b

    14:47:56.679 on 21 oct: Vi3 PPP: unlocked by [0x10] always locked by 0 x [0]

    14:47:56.679 on 21 oct: Vi3 PPP: free previously blocked vaccess

    14:47:56.679 on 21 oct: Vi3 PPP: Phase is BROKEN

    14:47:56.679 on 21 oct: % LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface virtual-access.3, changed State to down

    14:47:56.683 on 21 oct: % LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface virtual-access.3, state change downstairs

    I'll be very grateful for any useful suggestions

    We had the same problem using MS-CHAP-V2 and 3945 router using IOS 15.2. When you add the same combination of username/password locally it worked fine but it wasn't no of course of the solution. We have solved this problem by adding the following line in the config file:

    AAA authorization network default authenticated if

    This is because Windows 2000 clients require the use of a statement of authorization aaa in the router config. Maybe it was default (and therefore not shown) previous iOS releases.

    Success!

    Wil Schenkeveld

  • L2l IPSec VPN 3000 and PIX 501

    Hello

    I have a remote site that has a broadband internet connection and uses a PIX 501.  We wanted to connect them with our main office using our VPN 3000 via VPN site-to-site.

    I followed the following documentation:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2284/products_configuration_example09186a00800949d2.shtml#tshoot

    However the L2L session does not appear on the hub when I check the active sessions.

    The network diagram, as well as the PIX config and the screenshots of the VPN configuration for the IPSec-L2L tunnel is attached.

    Any help or advice are appreciated.

    I just noticed that the PIX firewall, the phase 1 paramateres are not configured. You must configure the same PASE 1 and phase 2 settings on both ends of the tunnel.

    For example, on CVPN 3000, you have configured settings Phase 1 as 3DES, pre-shared key etc... We have the same configuration on the PIX firewall too.

    Here is an example of sample config

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2284/products_configuration_example09186a00800949d2.shtml

    I hope this helps!

  • VPN 3000 and wildcard peer IKE

    The order PIX (http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_sw/v_63/cmdref/gl.htm#wp1027312) reference:

    ISAKMP key address

    To configure a preshared authentication key and associate the key with a host name or the IPSec peer address, use the address isakmp key command. Use the address no. isakmp key command to remove a preshared authentication key and its associated IPSec peer address.

    A 0.0.0.0 netmask. may be entered as a wildcard indicating that any peer IPSec with a preshared key valid given is a valid counterpart.

    Question: Is it possible to do the same thing on the VPN 3000? I have a bunch of PIX firewall, they use DSL w / DHCP. I need them to operate in the Mode of Extension of network, but unlike PIX, I can't seem to get the VPN 3000 to accept the '0.0.0.0' as you can do it with PIX. Anyone has any idea if this is possible or another way to achieve the goal? Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.

    Yep, it's possible, even if it's not too obvious how you do :-) The following configuration example shows how do:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2284/products_configuration_example09186a00801dd672.shtml

    The key option is the "Default pre-shared key" under the core group.

  • Clients vpn AnyConnect and cisco using the same certificate

    Can use the same certificate on the ASA client Anyconnect and cisco vpn ikev1-2?

    John.

    The certificate is to identify a user/machine rather than the Protocol, then Yes, generally 'yes' you can use the same certificate for SSL/IKEv1/IKEv2 connections.

    What you need to take care of, it's that said certificate is fulliling Elements of the Protocol, for example implmentations IKEv2 is 'necessary' particular KU are defined and client-server-auth/auth EKU are defined on the certificates.

    M.

  • Access VPN ASA and cisco ISE Admin

    Hello

    Currently I'm deployment anyconnect VPN Solution for my client on ASA 9.2 (3). We use the ISE 1.3 to authenticate remote users.

    In the policy stipulates the conditions, I put the condition as below.

    Policy name: Anyconnect

    Condition: DEVICE: Device Type Device Type #All Device Types #Dial - in access EQUALS AND
    RADIUS: NAS-Port-Type is equal to virtual

    I'm authenticating users against the AD.

    I am also restrict users based on group membership in authorization policies by using the OU attributes.

    This works as expected for remote users.

    We also use the ISE to authenticate administrators to connect to the firewall. Now what happens is, Cisco ASA valid also against policy, administrators and their default name Anyconnect.

    Now the question is, how to set up different political requirement for access network admin and users the same Firewall VPN.

    Any suggestions on this would be a great help.

    See you soon,.

    Sri

    You can get some ideas from this article of mine:

    http://ltlnetworker.WordPress.com/2014/08/31/using-Cisco-ISE-as-a-generic-RADIUS-server/

  • A Site VPN PIX501 and CISCO router

    Hello Experts,

    I have an at home test lab, I set up a site to site vpn using a router Cisco PIX501 and CISCO2691, for configurations, I have just a few links on the internet, because my background on VPN configuration is not too good, for the configuration of routers, I followed this link:

    www.Firewall.CX/Cisco-Technical-Knowledgebase/Cisco-Routers/867-Cisco-ro...

    and for configuring pIX I just use the VPN Wizard of pix. All confgurations but ping failed. Hope you can help me with this, don't know what to do here (troubleshooting).

    Joint here is the configuration of my router, topology, as well as the pix configuration. Hope you can help me with this. Thanks in advance.

    Hi Mark,

    I went in the Config of the ASA

    I see that the dispensation of Nat is stil missing there

    Please add the following

    access-list allowed sheep ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 172.21.1.0 255.255.255.0

    inside NAT) 0 access-list sheep

    Then try it should work

    Thank you

    REDA

  • VPN 3000 RRI

    Hi guys,.

    I'm working on the creation of a vpn between a vpn 3000 and a

    point of control, the problem I have on the vpn3000 is that if I do not have

    Select "reverse road injection" it won't establish the vpn.

    I thought she might have because the roads of local lan did not exist

    on the vpn 3000, so I added static to match the list of the network, but it

    still wouldn't go out, as soon as I activate the reverse road injection it

    works very well.

    any ideas?

    Thank you

    Adam Baxter.

    Adam,

    Take out the static routes and also injection Road opposite say-able.

    Activate the logs on the hub of gravity 1-13 for IPSEC & IPSECDBG, IKE, AUTH, IKEDBG, AUTHDBG.

    Try to send a ping to the interesting traffic. Capture logs and send them to this post, let me take a look and see if there is a question that jumps.

    See you soon

    Gilbert

  • IPSec tunnels between duplicate LAN subnets

    Hi all

    Please help to connect three sites with our Central site has all the resources for users, including internet access.

    The three sites will be the ASA 5505 like their WAN device.

    We need to know is - it possible, allowing to configure an IPsec Tunnel between the three ASA with duplicate LAN subnets.

    Central site two networks 192.168.1.x 24, 192.168.100.x 24

    Distance a 24 192.168.1.x subnet

    Two remote a subnet 192.168.100.x 24

    If it is possible we also do hair distance one ping, above two remote to the Central Site to access internet, what sites need are on the Central Site, including e-mail, network, other resource also records.

    We have no other way to make this network, as all security is on our Central Site, website filtering, Application filtering, filtering of network traffic all.

    We understand that we can change two remote sites to a different subnet from the Central Site, but we have so many host devices, it will take weeks or months, so to change the MS AD domain for all users, servers too.

    We really need your expertise to do this in a laboratory and then in production.

    Thank you

    Hello Stephen,

    You can check the following links for the subnets overlap talk to each other:-

    1 LAN-to-LAN IPsec VPN with overlapping networks

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a0080b37d0b.shtml

    2 IPsec between two IOS routers with overlapping of private networks

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps5855/products_configuration_example09186a0080a0ece4.shtml

    Important point is local network must connect to the remote network via the translated addresses.

    for example, you won't be ablt to use real IP of the communication.

    For haripinning or turning U:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00805734ae.shtml

    Hope that helps.

    Kind regards

    Dinesh Moudgil

  • VPN between a PIX and a VPN 3000

    I'm trying to set up a VPN between PIX and a VPN 3000. All configurations are complete, but the tunnel has not been established. On the PIX, to 'see the crypto engine' and ' show isakmp his ' orders, I do not see the tunnel. Of "show ipsec his ' command, I can see the mistakes"#send"continues to increase when I try to connect to the remote network. Here is the copy - paste command:

    Tag crypto map: myvpnmap, local addr. 10.70.24.2

    local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (10.70.24.128/255.255.255.128/0/0)

    Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (10.96.0.0/255.224.0.0/0/0)

    current_peer: 10.70.16.5:0

    LICENCE, flags is {origin_is_acl},

    #pkts program: encrypt 0, #pkts: 0, #pkts 0 digest

    #pkts decaps: 0, #pkts decrypt: 0, #pkts check 0

    compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0

    #pkts uncompressed: 0, #pkts compr. has failed: 0, #pkts decompress failed:

    #send 12, #recv errors 0

    local crypto endpt. : 10.70.24.2, remote Start crypto. : 10.70.16.5

    Path mtu 1500, fresh ipsec generals 0, media, mtu 1500

    current outbound SPI: 0

    SAS of the esp on arrival:

    the arrival ah sas:

    SAS of the CFP on arrival:

    outgoing esp sas:

    outgoing ah sas:

    outgoing CFP sas:

    Obviously, the PIX identifies protected traffic but failed to establish the tunnel. I was wondering what could be the reason for these kind of mistakes? That means them growing '#send errors?

    Thank you very much!

    Sending error mean simply the PIX is grateful to encrypt this traffic, but there is no built tunnel and so it must drop the package.

    you will need to look at why the tunnel is not under construction however, "sending error" are just a byproduct of some other configuration issue. On the PIX, it looks like you would have something like:

    Crypto ip 10.70.24.128 access list allow 255.255.255.128 10.96.0.0 255.224.0.0

    On the 3000 under the L2L section and the Local and remote network, you need the exact opposite of the latter, then it would be:

    / Local network mask = 10.96.0.0/0.31.255.255

    / Remote network mask = 10.70.24.128/0.0.0.127

    If you have something else the tunnel will fail to come. Otherwise, we see that the Cryptography debugs the PIX and the trunk of the 3000 when the tunnel is built.

  • Use the client VPN tunnel to cross the LAN-to-LAN tunnel

    I have been troubleshooting an issue and cannot cross an obstacle. The ASA is running ASA running 1,0000 code 24. I am using a client VPN tunnel to connect to the ASA. The ASA has already a LAN-to-LAN tunnel, set up and operating and I need the VPN client to access the remote site over the LAN-to-LAN tunnel.

    The internal IP address of the local part is 192.168.0.0/24 and the IP address of the Remote LAN-to-LAN tunnel is 172.20.1.0/24. The clients are distributed 192.168.200.0/24 IPs. I have attached the relevant configuration for the SAA.

    When the VPN client on the network, I can access resources on the ASA network internal. On the internal network of the SAA, users can access resources through the LAN-to-LAN tunnel. Client VPN cannot access resources on the LAN-to-LAN tunnel. For the latter, there are no hits on the C-TEST access list.

    Thank you for your help.

    try adding...

    permit same-security-traffic intra-interface

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00806370f2.html#wp1042114

Maybe you are looking for