Loadbalancing ASA VPN and firewall failover issue

Similar Questions

• RVL200 - SSL VPN and firewall rules

  Forgive my ignorance, but I have been immersed in the configuration of this device RVL200 to allow Remoting SSL VPN to a customer site, sight unseen.  I have the basics of the VPN set up in config, but now move the firewall rules.  We want to block all internal devices to access the Internet, but I don't want to cripple the remote clients that will be borrowed by blocking their return via the SSL VPN traffic.  This leads to my questions:

  (1) a rule of DENIAL of coverage for all traffic OUTBOUND will prevent the primary function of the VPN (to allow the administration away from machines on the local network)?

  (2) if the answer to #1 is 'Yes', what ports/services do I need to open the side LAN?

  (3) building # 2, configuring authorized outbound rules apply only for VPN clients, rather than all the hosts on LAN?

  (4) as the default INCOMING traffic rule is to REFUSE EVERYTHING, do I have to create a rule to allow the VPN tunnel, or guess that in the configuration of the router?

  Here are some other details:

  • The LAN behind the RVL200 is also isolated LAN in a manufacturing environment
  • All hosts on this network have a static IP address on a single subnet.
  • The RVL200 has been configured with a static, public IP on the WAN/INTERNET side.
  • DHCP has been disabled on the RVL200
  • Authentication to the device will use a local database.
  • There is no such thing as no DNS server on the local network
  • The device upstream of the RVL200 is a modem using PPPoE DSL, and the device has been configured for this setting.
  • Several database of local users accounts were created to facilitate the SSL VPN access.

  I worked with other aspects of it for a long time, but limited experience with VPN and the associated firewall rules and zero with this family of aircraft.  Any help will be greatly appreciated.

  aponikikay, there is no port forwarding necessary to the function of the RVL200 SSL - VPN.

  Topic 1. That is not proven. It shouldn't do. The router should automatically make sure that the SSL - VPN router service is functional and accessible.

  Re 2. No transfer necessary. In addition, never before TCP/UDP port 47 or 50 for VPN functions. The TCP 1723 port is used for PPTP. UDP 500 is used for ISAKMP. You usually also to transmit TCP/UDP 4500 port for IPSec encapsulation.

  Let's not port 47. ERM is an IP protocol that is used for virtual private networks. It is a TCP or UDP protocol. GRE has 47 IP protocol number. It has nothing to do with TCP or UDP port 47. TCP and UDP are completely different protocols of free WILL.

  It goes the same for 50: ESP is the payload for IPSec tunnels. ESP is the Protocol IP 50. It has nothing to do with TCP or UDP port 50.

  'Transfer' of the GRE is configured with PPTP passthrough option.

  'Transfer' of the ESP is configured with IPSec passthrough option.

• Client VPN and WinXP compatibility issue

  I have the Cisco VPN client installed on my WinXP SP2 for VPN access occasionally to our or networks to do. Suddenly I lost the ability to ping or against opening a TCP/UDP on my PC in LAN connection last week. All communications initiated FROM my PC worked fine. I did a lot of experiments and found that the issue is a Cisco VPN Windows service. As soon as the service, everything is OK. Some updates of Windows came last week and I thing that some of them is not interoperable with the Cisco VPN client. The client is 4.8.01.0300.

  Does anyone have the same experience or a solution without stopping the service manual?

  Have you tried to disable the Stateful Firewall VPN Client in the menu Options too?

• Remote access ASA, VPN and NAT

  Hello

  I try to get access to remote VPN work using a Cisco VPN client and ASA with no split tunneling. The VPN works a little, I can access devices inside when I connect, but I can't access the Internet. I don't see any errors in the log ASA except these:

  1 Jul 04:59:15 % ASA-3-305006 gatekeeper: failed to create translation portmap for udp src outside:192.168.47.200/137 dst outside:192.168.47.255/137
  1 Jul 04:59:15 % ASA-3-305006 gatekeeper: failed to create translation portmap for udp src outside:192.168.47.200/54918 dst outsidexx.xxx.xxx.xxx/53

  There is only one address public IP that is assigned to the external interface of DHCP. The Interior is 192.168.1.0/24 network which is PAT'ed to the external interface and the VPN network is 192.168.47.X.

  I think my problem is that the net.47 is not NAT'ed out properly and I don't know how to put in place exactly. I can't understand how this is supposed to work since the net VPN technically provenance from the outside already.

  Here are all the relevant config:

  list of vpn access extended permits all ip 192.168.47.0 255.255.255.0
  Within 1500 MTU
  Outside 1500 MTU
  IP local pool vpnpool 192.168.47.200 - 192.168.47.220 mask 255.255.255.0
  IP verify reverse path to the outside interface
  IP audit info alarm drop action
  IP audit attack alarm drop action
  ICMP unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
  ICMP allow all outside
  Global interface (2 inside)
  Global 1 interface (outside)
  NAT (inside) 0-list of access vpn
  NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
  NAT (outside) 2 192.168.47.0 255.255.255.0 outside
  static (inside, outside) tcp 3074 XBOX360 3074 netmask 255.255.255.255 interface
  static (inside, outside) udp 3074 XBOX360 3074 netmask 255.255.255.255 interface
  public static (inside, outside) udp interface 88 88 XBOX360 netmask 255.255.255.255
  public static tcp (indoor, outdoor) https someids netmask 255.255.255.255 https interface

  I can post more of the configuration if necessary.

  Change ' nat (outside) 2 192.168.47.0 255.255.255.0 apart ' "NAT (2-list of vpn access outdoors outside)" gives these:

  1 Jul 06:18:35 % gatekeeper ASA-3-305005: no group of translation not found for udp src outside:192.168.47.200/56003 dst outside:66.174.95.44/53

  So, how I do right NAT VPN traffic so it can access the Internet?

  A few things that needs to be changed:

  (1) NAT exemption what ACL must be modified to be more specific while the traffic between the internal subnets and subnet pool vpn is not coordinated. NAT exemption takes precedence over all other statements of NAT, so your internet traffic from the vpn does not work.

  This ACL:

  list of vpn access extended permits all ip 192.168.47.0 255.255.255.0

  Should be changed to:

  extensive list of access vpn ip 192.168.47.0 255.255.255.0 allow

  (2) you don't need statement "overall (inside) 2. Here's what to be configured:

  no nat (outside) 2 192.168.47.0 255.255.255.0 outside

  no global interface (2 inside)

  NAT (outside) 1 192.168.47.0 255.255.255.0

  (3) and finally, you must activate the following allow traffic back on the external interface:

  permit same-security-traffic intra-interface

  And don't forget to clear xlate after the changes described above and connect to your VPN.

  Hope that helps.

• VPN and firewall box

  Hello

  I have a site to another using VTI VPN.

  I tried to configure my fw by sector to decline to ping on my WAN IP, but when I applied it, my VPN is down.

  Could someone advise me how to do?

  Here is my config:

  type of class-card inspect entire game inside-outside-class
  https protocol game
  http protocol game
  dns protocol game
  match icmp Protocol
  tcp protocol match
  udp Protocol game
  type of class-card inspect all outside-Self-class match

  match the name of group-access ICMPReply

  Access-group name ISAKMP

  type of class-card inspect any VPN-Interior-class match
  match icmp Protocol
  tcp protocol match
  udp Protocol game
  http protocol game
  ssh protocol game
  https protocol game
  sip protocol game
  type of class-card inspect entire game inside-VPN-class
  match icmp Protocol
  tcp protocol match
  udp Protocol game
  http protocol game
  https protocol game
  ssh protocol game
  sip protocol game

  type of policy-card inspect the inside-outside-policy
  class type inspect inside-outside-Class
  inspect
  class class by default
  type of policy-card inspect VPN-Interior-policy
  class type inspect VPN-Interior-class
  inspect
  class class by default
  type of policy-card inspect the Interior-VPN-policy
  class type inspect the Interior-VPN-class
  inspect
  class class by default

  type of policy-card inspect outside-Self-policy
  class type inspect outside-Self-class
  inspect
  class class by default

  area inside security
  security of the outside area
  the security VPN zone

  zone-pair security starting source of domestic destination outdoors
  type of service-strategy inspect the inside-outside-policy
  VPN-In source destination inside VPN security zone-pair
  type of service-strategy inspect VPN-Interior-policy
  zone-pair security VPN-source inside VPN destination
  type of service-strategy inspect the Interior-VPN-policy

  auto-Out security of the zone-pair source outside the car destination
  type of service-strategy inspect outside-Self-policy

  Interface Tunnel100

  the Member's area VPN security

  Source of Dialer0 tunnel

  Interface Dialer0

  security of the outside Member area

  Interface Vlan1

  security of the inside members area

  ISAKMP extended IP access list
  allow udp any any eq isakmp
  allow a whole ahp
  allow an esp
  permit any any eq non500-isakmp udp

  ICMPReply extended IP access list
  allow all all host unreachable icmp

  Thank you

  Thank you, so the phase 1 is on the rise, however, phase 2 is not.

  I guess this works if you remove the ZBFW?

  Can you enable logging and check if there is no ZBFW error message?

  Also, you disable the tunnel after the configuration of ZBFW?

  clear the isa cry his

  Claire crying its

  Configuration seems correct.

• AnyConnect VPN and LAN access

  When remote users to connect to the Cisco ASA VPN and authenticate with Cisco AnyConnect client, they then full access to the environment internal of LAN of business as if they were sitting at their desks in the Office of the Corporation.

  Right?

  After that the remote client authenticates to the AnyConnect VPN, it is sensible to then run remote users of traffic through the corporate firewall (outside to inside) before allowing LAN access full corporate?

  Remote_User - vpn - ANYCONNECT-(outside) (inside) firewall - CORP_LAN

  Thank you

  Frank

  Hello

  Yes, by default, all traffic will be sent through the tunnel.

  If there are users VPN shouldn't be able to reach the resources, you need to establish rules for access to it. The best way to do this is by using VPN filter.

• ASA Vpn load balancing and failover

  Hi all.

  We have two asa5520 configured as main unit and emergency in failover configuration, and everything works fine.

  Is it possible with this configuration (switch), configure the vpn load balancing/grouping?

  Thank you

  Daniele

  Hi Daniele,

  You cannot run two of them on two firewalls ASA, VPN feature load balancing or failover functionality.

  Where you need to use the two feature, you must use more than three ASA firewall, two first ASAs will work as the failover and the ASA third will work as cluster VPN for them, the following example uses four firewalls:

  ASA1 (active FO) - ASA2 (TF Standby)

  (VPN virtual master)

  |

  |

  |

  |

  (Backup VPN device)

  ASA3 (active FO) - ASA4 (TF Standby)

  Kind regards

  Wajih

• Site to Site VPN between Cisco ASA 5505 and Sonicwall TZ170

  I'm trying to implement a VPN site-to site between our data center and office.  The data center has a Cisco ASA 5505 and the Office has a Sonicwall TZ170.  I managed to configure the two so that the vpn connects.  Each of the firewall I ping the IP Address of the internet firewall on the other side and a desktop computer I can ping the IP Address of the firewall internal datacenter but I can't carry traffic between private subnets datacenter and desktop.  Can anyone help?

  The config below has had IPs/passwords has changed.

  External Datacenter: 1.1.1.4

  External office: 1.1.1.1

  Internal data center: 10.5.0.1/24

  Internal office: 10.10.0.1/24

  : Saved
  :
  ASA Version 8.2 (1)
  !
  hostname datacenterfirewall
  mydomain.tld domain name
  activate the password encrypted
  passwd encrypted
  names of
  name 10.10.0.0 OfficeNetwork
  10.5.0.0 DatacenterNetwork name
  !
  interface Vlan1
  nameif inside
  security-level 100
  10.5.0.1 IP address 255.255.255.0
  !
  interface Vlan2
  nameif outside
  security-level 0
  1.1.1.4 IP address 255.255.255.0
  !
  interface Ethernet0/0
  switchport access vlan 2
  !
  interface Ethernet0/1
  !
  interface Ethernet0/2
  !
  interface Ethernet0/3
  !
  interface Ethernet0/4
  !
  interface Ethernet0/5
  !
  interface Ethernet0/6
  !
  interface Ethernet0/7
  !
  passive FTP mode
  clock timezone IS - 5
  clock to summer time EDT recurring
  DNS server-group DefaultDNS
  buydomains.com domain name
  permit same-security-traffic inter-interface
  permit same-security-traffic intra-interface
  inside_access_in list extended access permit icmp any one
  inside_access_in list extended access permitted tcp a whole
  inside_access_in list extended access udp allowed a whole
  inside_access_in of access allowed any ip an extended list
  outside_access_in list extended access permit icmp any one
  outside_access_in list extended access udp allowed any any eq isakmp
  IP DatacenterNetwork 255.255.255.0 OfficeNetwork 255.255.255.0 allow Access-list extended pixtosw
  pixtosw list extended access allow icmp DatacenterNetwork 255.255.255.0 OfficeNetwork 255.255.255.0
  IP OfficeNetwork 255.255.255.0 DatacenterNetwork 255.255.255.0 allow Access-list extended pixtosw
  pixtosw list extended access allow icmp OfficeNetwork 255.255.255.0 DatacenterNetwork 255.255.255.0
  outside_cryptomap_66.1 list of allowed ip extended access all OfficeNetwork 255.255.255.0
  outside_cryptomap_66.1 ip OfficeNetwork 255.255.255.0 allowed extended access list all
  outside_cryptomap_66.1 list extended access permit icmp any OfficeNetwork 255.255.255.0
  outside_cryptomap_66.1 list extended access allowed icmp OfficeNetwork 255.255.255.0 everything
  pager lines 24
  Enable logging
  asdm of logging of information
  Within 1500 MTU
  Outside 1500 MTU
  IP verify reverse path to the outside interface
  ICMP unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
  ASDM image disk0: / asdm - 623.bin
  don't allow no asdm history
  ARP timeout 14400
  NAT-control
  Global 1 interface (outside)
  NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
  inside_access_in access to the interface inside group
  Access-group outside_access_in in interface outside
  Route inside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 1.1.1.1 1
  Route OfficeNetwork 255.255.255.0 outside 1.1.1.1 1
  Timeout xlate 03:00
  Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
  Sunrpc timeout 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 mgcp from 01:00 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00
  Sip timeout 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 prompt Protocol sip-0: 03:00 sip - disconnect 0:02:00
  Timeout sip-provisional-media 0:02:00 uauth 0:05:00 absolute
  timeout tcp-proxy-reassembly 0:01:00
  dynamic-access-policy-registration DfltAccessPolicy
  Enable http server
  http 10.5.0.0 255.255.255.0 inside
  No snmp server location
  No snmp Server contact
  Server enable SNMP traps snmp authentication linkup, linkdown cold start
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-SHA-ESP-3DES-3des esp-sha-hmac
  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA 256 - aes - esp esp-sha-hmac
  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-MD5 esp-aes-256 esp-md5-hmac
  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-SHA esp - esp-sha-hmac
  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-MD5 esp - esp-md5-hmac
  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-192-MD5 esp-aes-192 esp-md5-hmac
  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5-esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA aes - esp esp-sha-hmac
  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-192-SHA esp-aes-192 esp-sha-hmac
  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-128-MD5-esp - aes esp-md5-hmac
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-aes-256 walthamoffice, esp-sha-hmac
  life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800
  Crypto ipsec kilobytes of life - safety 4608000 association
  Crypto dynamic-map ciscopix 1 corresponds to the address outside_cryptomap_66.1
  Crypto dynamic-map ciscopix 1 transform-set walthamoffice
  Crypto dynamic-map ciscopix 1 the value reverse-road
  map dynmaptosw 66-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic ciscopix
  dynmaptosw interface card crypto outside
  crypto isakmp identity address
  crypto ISAKMP allow outside
  crypto ISAKMP policy 10
  preshared authentication
  3des encryption
  sha hash
  Group 2
  life 86400
  crypto ISAKMP policy 13
  preshared authentication
  aes-256 encryption
  sha hash
  Group 2
  lifetime 28800
  crypto ISAKMP policy 30
  preshared authentication
  aes-256 encryption
  sha hash
  Group 2
  life 86400
  No encryption isakmp nat-traversal
  Telnet 10.5.0.0 255.255.255.0 inside
  Telnet timeout 5
  SSH 10.5.0.0 255.255.255.0 inside
  SSH timeout 5
  Console timeout 0
  management-access inside
  dhcpd address 10.5.0.2 - 10.5.0.254 inside
  dhcpd allow inside
  !

  a basic threat threat detection
  Statistics-list of access threat detection
  no statistical threat detection tcp-interception
  NTP server 66.250.45.2 source outdoors
  NTP server 72.18.205.157 source outdoors
  NTP server 208.53.158.34 source outdoors
  WebVPN
  attributes of Group Policy DfltGrpPolicy
  VPN-idle-timeout no
  username admin password encrypted
  tunnel-group 1.1.1.1 type ipsec-l2l
  tunnel-group 1.1.1.1 ipsec-attributes
  pre-shared-key *.
  !
  !
  !
  type of policy-card inspect dns preset_dns_map
  parameters
  message-length maximum 512
  !
  context of prompt hostname
  Cryptochecksum:7f319172e5de9c0e550804a263f8e49e
  : end

  Mattew, obvious lack of education is the rule exempt from nat for your tunnel, your access list pixtosw is similar on this example, I assume that you have gone through this link, if it does not see the configs on both sides.

  Add the statement of rule sheep in asa and try again.

  NAT (inside) 0-list of access pixtosw

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a008052c9d4.shtml

  Concerning

• AnyConnect vpn and a tunnel vpn Firewall even outside of the interface.

  I have a (no connection) remote access vpn and ipsec tunnel connection to return to our supplier is on the same firewall outside interface.

  The problem is when users remote vpn in they are not able to ping or join the provider above the tunnel network.

  now, I understand that this is a Bobby pin hair or u turn due to traffic but I'm still not able to understand how the remote vpn users can reach the network of the provider on the tunnel that ends on the same interface where remote access vpn is also configured.

  The firewall is asa 5510 worm 9.1

  Any suggestions please.

  Hello

  You are on the right track. Turning U will be required to allow vpn clients access to resources in the L2L VPN tunnel.

  The essence is that the split tunneling to access list must include subnets of the remote VPN to peer once the user connects they have directions pertaining to remote resources on anyconnect VPN

  Please go through this post and it will guide you how to set up the u turn on the SAA.
  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/document/52701/u-turninghairpinning-ASA

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/ASA-5500-x-series-next-generation-firewalls/100918-ASA-sslvpn-00.html

  Kind regards
  Dinesh Moudgil

  PS Please rate helpful messages.

• Help with a VPN tunnel between ASA 5510 and Juniper SSG20

  Hello

  We have a customer wanting to configure a VPN Site to Site tunnel between a new purchased 5510 of ASA located in his direction with its Juniper SSG20 Office, located in the main office. We contacted HP and they send us a Cisco professional to do the job.

  After 2 days from 16:00 to 22:00 and error and countless hours of research online and nunerous calls, we are still unable to get traffic from the network of agencies to enter the tunnel.

  Main branch
  1.1.1.2                                 1.1.1.1
  -----                                               -----------
  192.168.8.0/24 | ASA|-----------------------------------| Juniper |    192.168.1.0/24
  -----                                               -----------
  192.168.8.254 192.168.1.254

  According to Cisco professionals, the tunnel is now in place but no traffic through. We are unable to ping anything on the network on the other side (192.168.1.0/24). We receive timeout ping all the time. The Cisco professional told us it's a routing or NAT problem and he's working on a solution!

  Through research, I came across a post on Experts-Exchange (here) [the 1st comment on the original post] which States "...". that both sides of the VPN must have a different class of LAN for the VPN to work... " Would that be our problem?

  It has become a critical issue to the point that he had to replace the Cisco ASA with a temporary Juniper SSG5 on another subnet (192.168.7.0/24) to get the tunnel upward and through traffic until the ASA VPN issue is resolved and I didn't need to say that the client is killing us!

  Help is very appreciated.

  Thank you

  1. Yes, ping package from the interface of the ASA is considered valuable traffic to the LAN of Juniper.

  SAA, need you traffic from the interface source ASA's private, because interesting to determine by crypto ACL MYLIST traffic between 192.168.8.0/24 and 192.168.1.0/24.

  You will also need to add the following configuration to be able to get the ping of the interface of the ASA:

  management-private access

  To initiate the ping of the private interface ASA:

  ping 192.168.1.254 private

  2. the default time before the next generation of new key is normally 28800 seconds, and if there is no interesting traffic flowing between 2 subnets, he'll tear the VPN tunnel down. As soon as there is interesting traffic, the VPN tunnel will be built automatically into the next generation of new key. However, if there is traffic before generating a new key, the new tunnel will be established, and VPN tunnel will remain standing and continue encrypt and decrypt traffic.

  Currently, your configuration has been defined with ITS lifetime of 3600 seconds GOLD / 4608000 kilobytes of traffic before the next generate a new key (it will be either 3600 seconds, or 4608000 kilobytes period expires first). You can certainly change it by default to 28800 seconds without configuring kilobytes. SA life is negotiated between the ASA and Juniper, and whatever is the lowest value will be used.

  Hope that helps.

• Device behind a Firewall other, ASA VPN

  I have a client who wants to put their VPN / behind the ASA ASA main connected to the Internet.  Both devices have an inside leg for the internal network, but the ASA VPN connects directly to the Internet ASA.

  Topology:

  Outisde FW: Internet transfer Procedure > ASA/FW > leg DMZ to ASA/VPN

  ASA VPN: Outside the L3 Interface interface DMZ of ASA/FW link

  On the outside NAT FW I would be the external address of the VPN / ASA outside the public IP address is available and I have a rule that allows all IP from outside to outside the private IP VPN.  Inside = 192.168.254.1 outside = public IP address.

  Configured on the VPN / ASA, ASA standard SSL Remote Access.

  When I hit the NAT public IP address, nothing happens.  I've run packet - trace on the FW outside, and everything seems good.

  Someone at - it a sampling plan / config for a similar topology?     Internet > ASA/FW > dmz-leg > ASA/VPN

  Thanks in advance,
  Bob

  Can share you your NAT and routing configuration? Of these two ASAs

• VPN site to Site ASA 5510 and 871 w / dynamic IP

  What is the best method of creating a VPN site-to site between an ASA 5510 and a router 871 where the 5510 has a static IP address and has 871, a dynamic IP address?

  My ASA is running ASA software version 7.0 (5) and I can't find how to create a tunnel for a dynamic IP address via the ASDM. I have currently a tunnel between these two arrangements in place, but it was done by specifying the remote IP address, even if it is dynamic.

  Any suggestions or pointers would be * very * appreciated.

  -Adam

  This can help but it does not show ASDM.

  http://Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00807ea936.shtml

• l2l ASA vpn issues

  Hi all

  I have two firewalls that I'm trying to implement VPNs l2l between them. Once of them is an old wall of sonic and the other 5505.

  I put in all and ends the phase 1/2 and the tunnel rises however no traffic passes through

  Here is my configuration

  ASA (outside, 192.168.30.1) asa internal 192.168.10.0/25

  (Outside 192.168.30.2) SonicWALL sonicwall 192.168.20.0/24

  I have an accesslist that is configured on the asa and applied to the cypto card using card crypto XXXX 1, atch address YYY

  However when I watch the news ebugging on the console it says: "cannot locate the output for UDP of XXXX interface: 192.168.10.10/1 to 192.178.20.1/0.

  any ideas why this is?

  I just need a static route to say all traffic on asa with 192 source... 10.0 should go through 192.168.30.2?

  I guess it's the work of crypto card

  Am I wrong?

  Hello

  Begins to seems to me you have a filter ACL configured for your L2L VPN VPN and also the ACL filter of VPN and Crypto ACLs are the same things, which means you use a simple both ACL.

  Why I think it's like this is the fact that you say that your VPN L2L cross trading in the "packet-tracer" VPN Phase means Crypto VPN L2L ACL was correct. At the same time say you that the connection was stopped to the Phase of the VPN USER. He points to a VPN filter ACL being configured.

  In view of the foregoing, I also know that the ACL of filter for the L2L VPN behave with a logic different than typical ACL interface. In VPN L2L the ACL filter ALWAYS mention the remote network as the source ALWAYS and your Local network as the destination.

  If add you an ACL rule with order switched networks appears this fixes the VPN filter ACL problems and finally allowed traffic. Naturally I can only guess that I saw actual configurations at this point (which, usually with release "packet - trace", help to solve a problem faster just guessing)

  If you indeed filter VPN, you may be able to track him down with the following commands

  See the tunnel-group race

  Check if a "group policy" is defined then the command

  See establishing group policy enforcement

  This output should list the name of the ACL filter VPN if its game

  Regarding the installantion auto road. The default setting for ASA, is that it will create NO static routes automatically depending on the VPN configurations. This must be enabled manually in "crypto map" configurations, or you can configure static routes manually.

  ASA tracking to default TCP and UDP connections. ICMP is inspected only if his permit. By default, it is NOT inspected.

  Hope this helps

  Remember to mark a reply as the answer if it answered your question.

  Feel free to ask more if necessary.

  -Jouni

• Cisco asa 5505 and centos VPN server connection

  Hi all

  Please I want to set up a VPN between Cisco asa 5505 and centos server.

  Here's my senerio

  -------------------------

  ASA 5505

  Public IP 155.155.155.2

  Local NETWORK: 192.168.6.X

  CentOS Server

  ------------------

  Public ip address: 155.155.155.6

  Thank you guys

  Apology, do you mean access remote VPN Client of hundred BONE for Cisco ASA 5505?

  If the remote access, here are the sample configuration:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a008060f25c.shtml

• Cisco Anyconnect VPN and IPSEC coexist on ASA 5520?

  Can a Cisco ASA 5520 which has been configured as IPSEC VPN gateway and also be configured as a gateway ANYCONNECT VPN and vpn IPSEC service anyconnect vpn clients clients maintenance at the same time? Any negative impact on the performance or any other problem that everyone knows?

  I guess that by 2 connection limit, you are referring to the 2 licenses for anyconnect?  You should consider using the anyconnect essentials license, which is relatively cheap (100-200 dollars I think) and will take you to the edge of the platform with anyocnnect.

  You shouldn't have any problem using IPSEC with LDAP client.  It is quite common - my company is IPSEC as Anyconnect off the coast of the same interface using authentication ldap (even same-group policy) for the two.

  -Jason