l2l ASA vpn issues

Similar Questions

• With the help of ASA 5510 L2L and VPN L2TP

  I would let my remote users access to all resources bhind the ASA and my remote branches.

  Here's my setup.  ASA5510 as a hub to the data center.

  172.21.x.x of internal network directly connected

  DMZ directly connected 172.22.1.x.x

  L2L branch1 VPN 10.47.x.x

  L2L branch2 VPN 10.47.y.x

  172.21.y.x remote users L2TP Windows Client

  I can access my internal resources related to the ASA but not the DMZ or branch offices. I need injection road routing and reverse?

  You also need to configure crossed.  http://goo.GL/vLqAR

• ASA VPN with Fortgate

  Hello people!

  I still have the problem with VPN... Laughing out loud

  I have to create a new VPN site to site between ASA 5510 (8.42 IOS) and Fortgate, but something is very strange, Don t VPN came and I see in the debug crypto 10 ikev1 the newspaper to follow:

  [IKEv1] phase 1 default: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Gr OUP Description: RRs would be: Cfg 1 group would be: Group 2

  But if I ask the other peer to change in Group 2, the msg in the SAA is:

  [IKEv1] phase 1 default: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Gr OUP Description: RRs would be: Group 2 GCF: Group 1

  Fortgate is possible to activate the two specific groups of VPN 1 and 2, and I would ask the other peer left this way and the ASA show:

  [IKEv1] phase 1 default: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Gr OUP Description: RRs would be: Group 2 GCF: Group 1
  [IKEv1] phase 1 default: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Gr OUP Description: RRs would be: Cfg 1 group would be: Group 2

  The show isakmp his:

  9 counterpart IKE: 179.124.32.181
  Type: user role: answering machine
  Generate a new key: no State: MM_WAIT_MSG3

  I have delete and creat VPN 3 x and the same error occurs.

  Everyone has seen this kind of problem?

  Is it using Fortigate version 5 by chance?

  I saw Cisco ASA VPN problems repeatedly with this code Fortigate, but above all it has been a problem of Phase 2 and defining KB life maximally on the side of the ASA has solved it... However this seems not to be your problem here.

  The first thing in your config I see you have PFS enabled - have you insured it is located on the side of Fortinet or tried to turn it off on the side of Cisco to see if it happens?

  Be stuck at MM_WAIT_MSG3 means that you sent your return policy, but then you have not received the third package in the ISAKMP riding so either the Fortigate is unhappy with something or there's a routing problem (however unlikely given that you have already had communication)

  Try on the side of the ASA:

  debug crypto isakmp 7

  You can also confrm your external interface is 'outside1 '? You can see this "see intellectual property."

• ASA VPN - allow user based on LDAP Group

  Hello friends

  I have create a configuration to allow connection based on LDAP Group.

  I m not specialize in the firewall and I tried to follow the links above, but both seem old, commanded several is not available.

  http://www.tunnelsup.com/Cisco-ASA-VPN-authorize-user-based-on-LDAP-group

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/ASA-5500-x-series-NEX...

  Anyone know how I can do?

  Thank you

  Marcio

  I like to use the Protocol DAP (dynamic access policies) to control this.  Follow this guide:

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/document/7691/ASA-8X-dynamic-access-policies-DAP-deployment-guide

• Assign the static IP address by ISE, ASA VPN clients

  We will integrate the remote access ASA VPN service with a new 1.2 ISE.

  Authentication is performed in Active directory. After authentication, can address assigned to a specific user of VPN by ISE IP?

  This means that the same VPN user will always get the same IP address. Thank you.

  Daniel,

  You can override the IETF-RADIUS-Framed-IP-Address in the authorization policy.

  However if I may make a suggestion:

  Unless you have only a handful of users to do so, it may be appropriate to assign the address of ISE pool or perform the mapping of LDAP attributes on ASA itself.

  In the latter case, the IP addresses are kept on the server as LDAP attributes and ASA will map the IP address. You don't want to keep address IP DB in several places.

  M.

• Device behind a Firewall other, ASA VPN

  I have a client who wants to put their VPN / behind the ASA ASA main connected to the Internet.  Both devices have an inside leg for the internal network, but the ASA VPN connects directly to the Internet ASA.

  Topology:

  Outisde FW: Internet transfer Procedure > ASA/FW > leg DMZ to ASA/VPN

  ASA VPN: Outside the L3 Interface interface DMZ of ASA/FW link

  On the outside NAT FW I would be the external address of the VPN / ASA outside the public IP address is available and I have a rule that allows all IP from outside to outside the private IP VPN.  Inside = 192.168.254.1 outside = public IP address.

  Configured on the VPN / ASA, ASA standard SSL Remote Access.

  When I hit the NAT public IP address, nothing happens.  I've run packet - trace on the FW outside, and everything seems good.

  Someone at - it a sampling plan / config for a similar topology?     Internet > ASA/FW > dmz-leg > ASA/VPN

  Thanks in advance,
  Bob

  Can share you your NAT and routing configuration? Of these two ASAs

• ASDM conc (ASA) VPN access

  I have the script like this:

  an ASA, which is the FW, TR making static NAT from the public to the private IP and private IP address add is add conc (another ASA) VPN. I am accessing these devices via the VPN client and I get the address IP of VPN pool set on VPN conc. VPN conc. is in a DMZ VLAN, but it also has connection to the local network segment. Purposes of mgmt, I connect to this VPN through SSH conc via a switch in the local network segment. To use the http access, I have to be on one of the servers that are in the local network segment. Since then, when I set up the VPN connection, I'm sure VPN conc., what can do to access http directly from my PC?

  This sets up on the conc VPN:

  management-access inside
  
  After that you should be able to use ASDM over the VPN tunnel, by connecting to its inside ip address.
  hth
  
      Herbert
  
      (note, I assume the name of the interface connected to the LAN is named "inside", if not adapt at will )

• ASA VPN positive = SSL VPN?

  Hello

  I have a pair of FO, I need to exchange an ASA5520 who owns a license of VPN over 750

  Can I use an ASA5520 with ASA5500-SSL-750 instead

  Regards Tony

  Yes, it is always available on order. Part number: ASA5520-VPN-PL =

  In addition, this more ASA VPN would be much much cheaper than the SSL VPN license.

  Thank you

  Kiran

• L2l ios VPN does not

  Hi all

  I am reproducing my client on the GNS scénarion.

  It is a frank l2l ios vpn and I use on two NAT routers.

  When I train trigger (ping using the source interface) VPN, VPN is not coming, and there is no error during the isakmp debug

  Please go through the configuration below and suggest me

  Thanks toufik

  It does not appear to be configured for each LAN routing. May need to configure the default route on each router to point to the other.

  In addition, enabling the option 'enable isakmp crypto '.

  All the other configuration looks OK.

• New ASA/VPN configuration

  So, I am looking to add one of my spare 5510 firewall to my secondary network as a vpn connection.

  All I want this new ASA to do is handle my site anyconnect VPN connections.  I'm pretty new to ASAs if any help would be great.  I know how to create a new access VPN on my ASA and I added a NAT for my inside and outside traffic to my new Pool of IP VPN.

  My question is, since it's only for the VPN and I want all my current internal traffic to continue to the asa 5510 existing routing, do I have to enter the ACL to my new single AAS of VPN?  ACLs are used for VPN traffic and do I need them to traffic the route via VPN?

  I'll put up inside interface of connection to one of my main Cisco switches and the outside interface connects to my DMZ switch on the new ASA only VPN.

  Thank you

  I don't know if I am how you connect to the external interface of single ASA VPN. Normally, in this type of installation, we would see the ASA VPN "in parallel" with the perimeter firewall.

  You mention the DMZ switch that threw me a little. If you are in France through your main firewall and go to single ASA VPN via the DMZ then Yes you will need to allow several open ports (protocol 50, udp/500, tcp/443 among others) and may have to do some other techniques (NAT - T, etc.) depending on the type of remote you are implementing. That's why we rarely see this configuration used - it adds a good dose of complexity without significant benefit.

  When the old facility is used, you need to switch internal to know to route traffic to the pool VPN through the only ASA VPN inside the interface. A static route is more often used, although you can use OSPF or EIGRP if you wanted to.

  Should generally not be any access list that VPN traffic around the Bank access lists incoming interface. Back to remote clients traffic is coming from inside and out through (and is usually part of anestablished connection) so no access list is necessary inside.

• ASA VPN on physical IP address only?

  Hello

  Is it possible to set up a virtual IP address dedicated to endpoint on ASA VPN version 8.3 and later?

  I don't want to use the physical IP address on my external interface.

  Thank you

  No problem. Mark pls kindly responded to this post like so that others may learn from your post. Thank you.

• ASA Vpn load balancing and failover

  Hi all.

  We have two asa5520 configured as main unit and emergency in failover configuration, and everything works fine.

  Is it possible with this configuration (switch), configure the vpn load balancing/grouping?

  Thank you

  Daniele

  Hi Daniele,

  You cannot run two of them on two firewalls ASA, VPN feature load balancing or failover functionality.

  Where you need to use the two feature, you must use more than three ASA firewall, two first ASAs will work as the failover and the ASA third will work as cluster VPN for them, the following example uses four firewalls:

  ASA1 (active FO) - ASA2 (TF Standby)

  (VPN virtual master)

  |

  |

  |

  |

  (Backup VPN device)

  ASA3 (active FO) - ASA4 (TF Standby)

  Kind regards

  Wajih

• 8.2 ASA vpn filter for connections l2l

  I have a vpn-filter set to my police L2L. The remote site uses a Cisco 1811 router and the main hub is a Cisco 5580. I already have an acl of vpn-filter in place on an existing L2L connection which works fine. The only question is, when I make changes to the ACLs for add/remove access, I have to reload the whole of the tunnel until the changes take place.

  My question is, are at - it a command to reload the access control without destroying the tunnel?

  Hi Jeffrey,.

  Design whenever there are changes in the attributes of Group Policy (including the vpn-filter, dns ip of victories or vpn-Protocol etc.), you need to reset the respective tunnel while phase 2 is negotiating with the newly added policy. The command to clear a specific tunnel is: -.

  his clear crypto ipsec peer

  For more details on the command, please see the link below

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa80/command/reference/C3.html#wp2133652

  So, to answer your query wasn't there command is not to reset the access control. There had been such a command you would still back the tunnel to trigger negotiations ipsec with the new group policy settings.

  HTH...

  Concerning
  Mohit

• 8.4 ASA using NAT VPN issue.

  Hello

  I'm working on a customer site and they have a problem with one of their VPN (we have other works well), but it is a major issue and I think it's because we use manual NAT and NAT of the object on the same server for different things.

  Traffic between indoors and outdoors:

  It works with a specific manual NAT rule of source from the server 10.10.10.10 object

  Inside

  SRC-> DST

  10.10.10.10-> 1.1.2.10 1.1.1.10-> 1.1.2.10 SNAT = VPN =-> 1.1.2.10 1.1.1.10 1.1.1.10-> 1.1.2.10 <3rd party="" fw="">

  It works with a specific using the NAT on the server of 10.10.10.10 object

  Remote

  SRC-> DST

  1.1.1.10-> 1.1.2.10 1.1.1.10-> 1.1.2.10 <3rd party="" fw="">= VPN =-> 1.1.2.10 1.1.1.10 1.1.1.10-> DNAT 10.10.10.10

  If we have the manual NAT and NAT object it does anyway.

  So the question is (as I am new to zip code 8.3 ASA) should not mix the 2 types of NAt and look at configuring it all with manual NAT or NAT object?

  With the NAT object out it does not work as it is taken in ouside NAT inside all:

  Dynamic NAT (inside, outside) source no matter what interface (this NAT to 1.1.1.1 then does not match the card encryption for VPN)

  and I tried a no - nat above that, but that does not work either.

  Straws and hugging come to mind try to configure a different config. Any pointers in the right direction would be great.

  Kind regards

  Z

  Hello

  I'm not sure that installing even with the explanation. Each NAT configuration I did for VPN used Section 1 Manual / NAT twice.

  You have configured the rule by default PAT that you use as Section 1 NAT rule. NAT rules in the new software are divided into 3 sections

  • Section 1: Manual / twice by NAT
  • Section 2: Purpose NAT
  • Section 3: Manual / double NAT (moved to section 3 using the setting "auto after")
  • The Sections are passed by from 1 to 2 and 3 in order to find a match.

  You should also notice that the Section 1 and Section 3 NAT has "line number" similar to the ACL parameter type. So if you have a default existing PAT rule configured for Section 1 and just add another Section 1 NAT rule without line/order number (VPN NAT) then it will just fall under the existing rule, making the new useless rule.

  I would advice against the use of the rule by default PAT as Section 1 NAT rule. Finally, this means that you be constantly watch and edit its configuration when you try to configure more specific rules.

  As a general rule 3 of the Section the PAT above default configuration would be the following

  NAT (inside, outside) after the automatic termination of dynamic source no matter what interface

  This would mean that you need to remove the old. That would mean as naturally as the change would temporarily dismantling all the current connections through "inside", "Outside" while you change the NAT rule format.

  If after this configure a NAT twice to the VPN (wihtout the setting "auto after"), it will be the rule in article 1 while the default PAT will be Section 3. Of course, Section 1 will be matched first.

  I'm not quite sure of what your setup of the foregoing have understood.

  You're just source NAT?

  I guess that the configuration you do is something like this?

  network of the LAN-REAL object

  10.10.10.0 subnet 255.255.255.0

  purpose of the MAPPED in LAN network

  1.1.1.0 subnet 255.255.255.0

  being REMOTE-LAN network

  1.1.2.0 subnet 255.255.255.0

  NAT static destination of LAN LAN-REAL-MAPPED Shared source (indoor, outdoor) REMOTE - LAN LAN

  If the network 1.1.1.0/24 is supposed to be one that is connected directly to your "external" to the format interface may need to be anything else.

  -Jouni

• MS CA for VPN L2L ASA

  What type of certifcates I should issueing bee in my ASA.

  Now I'm issueing IPSEC (offline) and I don't know if it's the right kind.

  I have ICP work for mobile users. simply not L2L

  Yes,

  Which can cause failure.

  Put command

  "ignore-ipsec-keyusage" under the CompanyTrustPoint

  That should solve.