Loopback address VRF who flees to the global routing table

Similar Questions

• How can I write the trigger for the global temporary Table

  Hi Grus,
  How can I write the trigger for the global temporary Table.
  
  I created the TWG with trigger using the script below.
  
  
  CREATE A GLOBAL_TEMP GLOBAL TEMPORARY TABLE
  (
  EMP_C_NAME VARCHAR2 (20 BYTE)
  )
  ON COMMIT PRESERVE ROWS;
  
  
  CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER TRI_GLOBAL_TEMP
  BEFORE DELETE, UPDATE OR INSERT
  ON GLOBAL_TEMP
  REFERRING AGAIN AS NINE OLD AND OLD
  FOR EACH LINE
  BEGIN
  INSERT INTO VALUES EMPNAME (: OLD.) EMP_C_NAME);
  END;
  /
  
  
  trigger was created successfully, but her would not insert EMPNAME Table...
  
  Please guide if mistaken or not? If not wanting to give a correct syntax with example
  
  
  Thanks in advance,
  Arun M M

  BEGIN
  INSERT INTO EMPNAME VALUES (:OLD.EMP_C_NAME);
  END;
  

  you are referencing old value in insert stmt.
  
  BEGIN
  INSERT INTO EMPNAME VALUES (:new.EMP_C_NAME);
  END;
  

  then run your app, it works very well...

  CREATE GLOBAL TEMPORARY TABLE GLOBAL_TEMP
  (
  EMP_C_NAME VARCHAR2(20 BYTE)
  )
  ON COMMIT PRESERVE ROWS;
  
  CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER TRI_GLOBAL_TEMP
  BEFORE DELETE OR UPDATE OR INSERT
  ON GLOBAL_TEMP
  REFERENCING NEW AS NEW OLD AS OLD
  FOR EACH ROW
  BEGIN
  dbms_output.put_line(:OLD.EMP_C_NAME||'yahoo');
  INSERT INTO EMPNAME VALUES (:new.EMP_C_NAME);
  dbms_output.put_line(:OLD.EMP_C_NAME);
  END;
  /
  
  create table EMPNAME as select * from GLOBAL_TEMP where 1=2
  
  insert into GLOBAL_TEMP values('fgfdgd');
  commit;
  select * from GLOBAL_TEMP;
  select * from EMPNAME;
  
  output:
  1 rows inserted
  commit succeeded.
  EMP_C_NAME
  --------------------
  fgfdgd               
  
  1 rows selected
  
  EMP_C_NAME
  --------------------
  fgfdgd               
  
  1 rows selected
  

  He got Arun

  Published by: OraclePLSQL on December 28, 2010 18:07

• BlackBerry smartphones not the host routing table entries

  My blackberry storm2 shows no entries in the host routing table. I'm on a service plan that supports BIS everything was fine. My phone rebooted for no reason, and that's when the problem started

  Help, please

  Hello and welcome to the community!

  I suggest the following, in order, even if they seem redundant to what you have already tried (steps 1 and 2, each should result in a message to your BB to come...) Please wait for this before moving on to the next step):

  (1) registry HRT

  • KB00510 How to register a BlackBerry smartphone with wireless network
  • Please wait a 'registration' message reach your Messages application

  (2) remove and return Service directories

  • KB05000 Remove the maintenance book for the BlackBerry Internet Service email account in the BlackBerry smartphone
  • If you do not have access CMIME, continue deleting
  • KB02830 Send the directories for the BlackBerry Internet Service
  • Please wait "the Activation' Messages, one per already configured e-mail account, arrive in your Messages. If you have not already configured email accounts, please wait 1 hour.

  (3) restart to take batt

  • Each time a random strange behavior or slow creeps, the first thing to do is a battery pop reboot. With power ON, remove the hood back and remove the battery. Wait a minute, then replace the battery and cover. Power on and wait patiently through the long reboot - about 5 minutes. See if things return to functioning. Like all computing devices, BB suffers from memory leaks and others... with a hard reboot is the best remedy.

  I hope that will move things again for you! If any stage does not properly complete, proceed to the subsequent steps will be useless... and you will need to contact your mobile provider for formal support. It's their network that your BB is unable to communicate with, after all.

  Good luck!

• trigger on the global temporary table

  Hello

  I have a global temporary table

  CREATE GLOBAL TEMPORARY table to register)

  no_registre NUMBER primary key,

  date of create_time

  ) ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS.

  I have to write a trigger on the table every time that the insertion is made.

  create or replace trigger tri_register

  before inserting the REGISTER

  for each line

  Start

  : new create_Date: = sysdate;

  end;

  /

  This trigger can work on this registry table?

  Thank you

  913578 wrote:

  Sorry Karthik.

  the thing is that I did not have privelleges to test, I send the code to some dba who makes deployment.

  Sorry to hear that!

  Please tell me... We can write triggers on GTT?

  of course, you can!

  SQL > create a global temporary table registry
  () 2
  no_registre 3 number primary key,
  create_time date 4
  5)
  6 on the validation to delete lines;

  Table created.

  SQL > create or replace trigger register_trig before insert in the register for each line
  2 start
  3: new.create_time: = sysdate;
  4 end;
  5.

  Trigger created.

  SQL > insert into values of registry (no_registre) (1);

  1 line of creation.

  SQL > select * from registry;

  NO_REGISTRE CREATE_TI
  ----------- ---------
  1 8 JULY 13

• L2l VPN between ASA with the IP address public and CISCO2911 behind the ISP router with port forwarding

  Hi all

  My apologies if this is a trivial question, but I spent considerable time trying to search and had no luck.

  I encountered a problem trying to set up a temporary L2L VPN from a Subscriber with CISCO2911 sitting behind the router of the ISP of an ASA. ISP has informed that I can't ignore their device and complete the circuit Internet on the Cisco for a reason, so I'm stuck with it. The Setup is:

  company 10.1.17.1 - y.y.y.y - router Internet - z.z.z.z - ISP - LAN - 10.x.x.2 - XXX1 - ASA - 10.1.17.2 - CISCO2911 - 10.1.15.1 LAN

  where 10.x.x.x is a corporate LAN Beach private network, y.y.y.y is a public ip address assigned to the external interface of the ASA and the z.z.z.z is the public IP address of the ISP router.

  I have forwarded ports 500, 4500 and ESP on the ISP router for 10.1.17.2. The 2911 config attached below, what I can't understand is what peer IP address to configure on the SAA, because if I use z.z.z.z it will be a cause of incompatibility of identity 2911 identifies himself as 10.1.17.2...

  ! ^ ^ ^ ISAKMP (Phase 1) ^ ^ ^!
  crypto ISAKMP policy 5
  BA 3des
  md5 hash
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  lifetime 28800
  isakmp encryption key * address no.-xauth y.y.y.y

  ! ^ ^ ^ IPSEC (Phase 2) ^ ^ ^!
  crymap extended IP access list
  IP 10.1.15.0 allow 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA 3rd-esp esp-sha-hmac
  card crypto 1 TUNNEL VPN ipsec-isakmp
  defined peer y.y.y.y
  game of transformation-ESP-3DES-SHA
  match the address crymap

  Gi0/2 interface
  card crypto VPN TUNNEL

  Hello

  debug output, it seems he's going on IPSEC States at the tunnel of final bud QM_IDLE's.

  What I noticed in your configuration of ASA box, it's that you're usig PFS but not on 2911 router.

  So I suggest:

  no card crypto OUTSIDE_map 4 don't set pfs <-- this="" will="" disable="" pfs="" on="" asa="">

  Then try tunnel initiate.

  Kind regards

  Jan

• active sessions for the global temporary table

  Hello
  
  Is there no view or the way to know how many active users evaluate a global temporary table?
  
  Rgds,
  Piyush

  The following query should list the user accounts writing (with INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE) into the temporary table 'TWG' belonged to "O":

  select s.username, l.sid
  from v$lock l, v$session s
  where l.id1 =
  (select object_id from dba_objects where owner='O' and object_name='GTT')
  and l.sid = s.sid;
  

  The following query should list all user accounts by using the temporary table named "GTT" with SELECT/INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE statement:

  select username
  from v$session s, v$access a
  where s.sid = a.sid
  and object ='GTT';
  

  Edited by: P. Forstmann on June 9, 2010 09:40

• order of the lines of the global temporary table

  I have a global temporary table "TMP_PAYMENT_ANNUITY" and I insert records in there with loop for each iteration of loop insert a row in the table.
  Now, I'm back records inserted user with cursor in this way:

     open o_annuity_payments for 
        select * from TMP_PAYMENT_ANNUITY;

  Can I be sure that the slider will have records in exactly the same order as inserted loop them?
  Or do I also insert rownumber column of my table that I filled with the loop iteration variable, and I'll be back slider like this:
  

     open o_annuity_payments for 
        select * from TMP_PAYMENT_ANNUITY
         order by ROWNUMBER;

  Currently, I have "ROWNUMBER"-column in the table, but maybe I should create then? ".
  The question is about the order of the rows, how this order will be without "in order to" - clause?
  
  Published by: CharlesRoos on June 2, 2010 03:03

  CharlesRoos wrote:
  >
  What makes the solution of the temporary table better?
  >

  1. This approach/solution is easier to read for other developers. Ugly hierarchical query with the function LAG is difficult to read and edit.

  I agree with you! It's one of the reasons when you should stop developing very sophisticated SQL statements. Even if the performance is slightly better.

  2-hierarchical-feature in sql is always slow and friendly error.

  I don't think that a hierarchical solution is necessary. but it may depend on your version of Oracle (think MODEL clause).

  3. it is easy to implement the "temporary table solution." with complex sql construction will be time-consuming and bug-friendly and complex.
  3. I'm not sure the question of perfomance, here I may be wrong, I test/compare.

  ...

  CharlesRoos wrote:
  1 can someone confirm that I don't need "ORDER byclause?

  I never would implement it WITHOUT a prescription by cluase. Why depend on such a solution?
  One of your strong points would improve maintainability. It is against this requirement.
  Imagine this happening, for example, when another developer decided to move from a temporary to a normal table. Maybe by adding a field 'user '.
  In such a scenario, you can find ways where the output is sorted not more properly.

  I can't find Google evidence.

  2. what happens if I order by as:

  select * from TMP_PAYMENT_ANNUITY
  ORDER BY ROWID;
  

  This approach maybe gives me the order of the rows as they are in the table?

  main problem is that you cannot test if it STILL works without order. But you will need to find not only one rare case that breaks it.

  * In a multiuser environment, the table could put a few lines where another session comes to delete certain lines. This could influence the agenda.
  * oracle could change something for the release of "like orders ' (I did they did already in the GROUP BY clause from 9i to 10g).

• The Internet Routing Table storage

  Hello

  If I'm providers with two suppliers with two separate routers running iBGP between them--will both my routers have to store two separate copies of the routing table so consume twice the space AAGR? So roughly 1 million routes?

  In order to answer your question, that you understand that the FIB is a place where registered a neighbor routes are stored. But this isn't the only place. You are right that the FIB will contain what the router has determined as being the 'best' roads and, usually, a single road for each prefix. But if you run THAT BGP then the router must also store in BGP (separated from the FIB) tables what he learned from his neighbors. So if 2 full courses of advertising ISP then the table router BGP will have two copies of the complete course (an external neighbor) and one IBGP.

  HTH

  Rick

• Small request help on the use of the global temporary table - some doubts

  
  Hi all

  Few days back according to a condition, I used a TWG (on the ranks of commit preserve).

  I created a trigger (before the insertion of line level) on GTT that calls a procedure (pragma autonomous transaction declared in the procedure).

  Procedure inserts data into two tables and I have a validation final (after the two insertion of data in tables) in the procedure.

  I tested by inserting the number of lines in TWG and found that the two tables are correctly supply procedure called by trigger.

  Which means that my works absolutely perfect functionality. (performance is also good)

  Now, my question is: since in the production source ETL tool will load this TWG.

  ETL will use this table in different processes simultaneously.

  Suppose that a single session ETL populates this table, and at the same time in parallel another session fills this table with different data. is there a lock on this TWG?

  Would the TWG is blocking other lines to add at any time?

  Is it possible that data may disappear without completing the entire process prematurely TWG?

  PS the feature I developed is the generic exception feature. This works for all valid tables for the database. For most of the tables will be filled with ETL, that's why I had these doubts in my mind.

  I apologize, if these seems like childish doubts.

  Thank you very much

  Arpit Agrawal

  Each line I'll get my GTT and follow all the features [trigger procedure &], will be considered as a session until the validation, right?

  This is not correct, a session is considered between the opening of session (session is created) and close the session (session is closed) of the database.

  If I use, validation TWG deletions here, how would he had differed on commit preserve as when my feature is completed, I don't want to keep more data.

  If on commit delete has been used here, it wouldn't make a difference in your case since you make is ENGAGING in some AUTONOMOUS OPERATIONS.

  In both cases, commit delete and commit preserve, you don't have to worry about the data inside the TWG because it will be empty onece you logoff (session ends).

  However, you can perform a delete operation in your session if you do not want to keep the data up to the end of the session.

• The Global NAT FVRF questions - for Expert

  Hi Expert,

  I have a client with a DMVPN network. Here is a simple drawing of installation:

  

  First I set the router og BRANCH1 config: BRANCH1 - Config.txt

  What the client wants is simple:

  Host 200.200.200.200 reach the host 192.168.100.2 on port 3389.

  So I thought to do the static NAT like this:

  IP nat inside source static tcp 192.168.100.2 3389 100.10.10.2 3389

  but it does not work because the BRANCH1 router is configured with FVRF who wants to say outside interface is in a VRF and local area network inside interface is globally. I couldn't see any traffic coming to the server (192.168.100.2) but I could see the translation in the nat process.

  So I tried to configure the virtual interface of NAT (NVI) I read that NVI works best in the VRF environment. This time with these lines:

  interface FastEthernet0/0
  Description * WAN connection *.
  bandwidth 20000
  IP vrf forwarding DMVPN-VRF
  IP 100.10.10.2 255.255.255.0
  IP access-group OUTSIDEACL in
  activate nat IP
  IP virtual-reassembly
  automatic duplex
  automatic speed
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/1
  Description * to connect to the computer 3 *.
  IP 192.168.100.1 address 255.255.255.0
  NBAR IP protocol discovery
  activate nat IP
  IP virtual-reassembly
  load-interval 30
  automatic duplex
  automatic speed
  No cdp enable

  IP nat source static tcp 192.168.100.2 3389 100.10.10.2 3389 extensible

  Then I finally got some entries of traffic in the server 192.168.100.2. See the Wireshark log:

  200.200.200.200 192.168.100.2 TCP stgxfws > ms-wbt-Server [SYN] Seq = 0 Win = 64240 Len = 0 MSS = 1260

  
  

  192.168.100.2 200.200.200.200 ms-wbt-Server TCP > stgxfws [SYN, ACK] Seq = 0 Ack = 1 win = 64240 Len = 0 MSS = 1460

  So far so good but but... the router sends an ICMP destination 13 unreachable code to the server:

  10.1.0.1 192.168.100.2 ICMP Destination unreachable (Communication administratively filtered)

  I guess that is because the router performs a search in the global routing table instead of the destination FVRF.

  Anyone know how I can fix this problem?

  Maybe a solution to HUB1 for this so everything is managed central, what do you thing?

  Best regards

  Laurent Rlap

  I can't spoke1 config. But first the routing needs to work and I would like to try a leak of the VRF the way in Global.

  IP route 200.200.200.200 255.255.255.255 FastEthernet0/0

  When this is fixed we can watch NAT.

  / Ralph

• Urgent: Can disable us ipv6 loopback address of the server of 2012?

  We organize our application in 2012, but the problem is that it does not accept permits servlets, as it is to bind to the loopback ipv6 address. We need immediate fix or suggestion that we are in the process of migrating applications

  Please suggest a way to disable the ipv6 loopback address?

  We tried the netsh interface ipv6 command > uninstall, but even if we are witnessing the loopback address

  C:\Users\esnedatadm>netsh the interface ipv6 show address

  Interface 1: Pseudo-Interface 1

  Addr Type DAD State valid life life prefs address

  ---------  ----------- ---------- ---------- ------------------------

  Other Preferred infinite infinite: 1

  This issue is beyond the scope of this site (for consumers) and to be sure, you get the best (and fastest) reply, we have to ask either on Technet (for IT Pro) or MSDN (for developers)
  *
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home s/fr-U.S./Accueil
  http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/Forum

• Using a global temporary table in BI Pubisher

  Hi all
  
  We have written a PL/SQl package that contains a function that fills the data in a global temporary table. We call this package in the "beforeReport" trigger in our data model.
  
  Our Dataquery section in the data model contains a 'Select' on this global temporary table statement. We are able to call the function, but there is no data from the Global Temp table.
  
  Initially, we have created the global table to try. Do we need to create this global temporary table in the package itself.
  
  Please advice.
  
  Thank you!

  Just use this

• Empty blackBerry Smartphones host routing table, will not register with the network.

  I want to apologize if I put this post in the wrong thread.

  So here's the question. I sent a request to my service provider to upgrade several SIM's have Blackberry service added to them. I asked specifically for them to make sure that the SIM card have been set to BES not BIS. The first SIM card I try to register with the network does the following for me. The phone, before I save it with the BES server can call and surf the internet. Once I have sync the phone with the company's server and I go back outside to check on her send and receive these emails, I try to control the internet and it says that the service is not available. I have 3G (Yes capitol) service and I can make phone calls. The host routing table is empty and when I try to save the phone it just says 'sent message' but I never receives the roads. I wiped the phone and repeat the steps with the same result. I contaced the carrier because all the Google search I did pointed to the carrier but they swear the correct plan is attached. Please if anyone can help me it would be greatly appreciated.

  Hello and welcome to the community!

  In fact, he should persist with the carrier. But first try to remove this BB to your BES, then by the ResetToFactory WIPE to remove the it strategy. Then run everywhere with the BB, ensuring that you can do all the activities of BIS (including filling of the HRT) before activating the BES. If it continues to fail, then you must climb the carrier and BIS get work before you activate BES.

  HRT and the functions of BIS should not be affected by BES, unless there is something in your it strategy that does. It is not very likely but it should impact the devices ALL active BES, not one only.

  Good luck!

• I do not use a proxy server to connect to internet, but Firefox is automatically configured to use the loopback address.

  I have a direct connection to the internet and that you do not use a proxy server. Every few weeks, Firefox will automatically reset itself to be configured to use a proxy to the loopback address (127.0.0.1). Manually change to 'No proxy' works, but I have to do so every time I open the browser or even a new tab. The only solution I can find is to create a new profile that gives me a new, clean install of FF, but then I lose all my Add-ons. This has happened several times now and it's extremely frustrating. I have scanned for malware, but have not found any problems.

  Hello rjlasser, first of all please make sure that none of your extensions is the origin of the problem (some circumvention of censorship of youtube addons do also use proxies for example).

  Otherwise please see How to fix the preferences that will not save for common solutions.

• How to disable IPV6 for the LOOPBACK address in windows vista

  Hi all

  I have problems in ASP.NET when running any site due to IPV6 alias for the loopback address

  So I need to know how to disable IPV6 for the LOOPBACK address in windows vista

  Help, please

  http://www.lboro.AC.UK/it/Vista/IPv6.html

  There is a record for this difficulty to the bottom of the page above for Tunnel and loopback interfaces...