Make two cheating SG200 four switches with vlan

Similar Questions

• VMware Distributed Switch with VLAN

  Hi again,

  A lot of work with VLAN now.

  But just a quick Questions. Is there a documentation or HowTo Guides how to set up vSphare VMware Distributed Switch with several VLANS on a Switch GS724Tv4?

  

  But soon, I try to add a host or network, it is empty.

  This is probably an easy problem of VMware, but I try here first to see if someone has document guide HowTo so I can start with.

  Thank you

  Christian

  Never mind about this,

  I found the problem on my own, but perhaps a documentation would be great to have. But it's a good start to have the right license of VMware, before you start.

  * I was just out of luck when I thought *.

  / Christian

• Operating a SG200-08 switch with case removed.

  I'll put a SG200-08 (8 port switch) within a 2U rack mount chassis.

  To improve cooling I thought I'd take off the outer case.

  Is there or are there problems with the help of the switch with the cover removed?

  Thank you

  Glen

  Hi Glen, the first question would be, the warranty is voided and you are not entitled to any help. The second question is static electricity and environmental concerns. The third question would probably be your property insurance.

  He is strongly against the recommendation to alter or change these units.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Can I do a composite picture to join two, three, or four images with a framework?

  I would like to make a composite image for my food blog, and so far I have used Photoshop, but just downloaded Lightroom and would like to find a way to do the same.

  It is very basic, either two photos, side, side, or four photos arranged in checkerboard form I hope with a nice frame around them

  is this doable in Lightroom?

  If you scroll to the tab (bottom right) printing, you can click the menu drop-down to change printer to JPEG.

• Mini of the UCS + 4 switches, no VLAN

  Hi all

  I have a mini UCS with 6324 modules e/s with B200 m3 x 5 blades, each ESXi 6.0 running.

  I want to uplink the UCS mini with four cables to four switches separated for traffic, and I wish that each host ESXi b200 see four separate vmincs, one on each network. The switches have no VLAN, but running DHCP. I want to get DHCP from each card.

  How can I go on the correspondences between the vNIC?  Groups of LAN Pin?

  Hi Alex,

  That is right. You can also implement Layer 2 disjoint explained in the guide below for more secure access.

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/data-center-virtualiza...

  I hope this helps.

  Qiese Sa'di

• PIX 6.3 (4) failover strangeness with VLAN

  I have a failover pair 535 6.3 (4) running and have experienced strange things while he was trying to get the dynamic failover to work. We use the serial cable to failover and a GE dedicated to the traffic of State via a cable directly connected x. We have a mix of standard interfaces for non - VLAN'ed, but also a physical I / f including 10 ~ VLAN. We are well within the limits of i / f allowed on the PIX so that isn't a problem. Also the

  VLAN'ed i / f on the two firewalls connects via a 802. 1 q trunk on the same switch Procurve 9315. All the required them VLAN is configured as marked on the two ports on the switch.

  The problem we had was that all as-based interfaces on the VLAN and physics i / f associated with these virtual local networks were perpetually in the State (pending) and we had no stats in the status section of the command 'show fail', which implies to me that stateful failover did not in fact. Failover works and traffic passes regardless of which firewall is enabled.

  Based on things I've read that I concluded that the problem is probably that 'Hello' messages were not being seen on each VLAN. So I did a bunch of capture on the VLAN different i / f of the PIX expecting to see outgoing Hello in the local unit, but saw nothing. Then I had a thought that maybe they were sent out without a label on the physical I / f, so I made a capture on it and also got nothing else than to the Hellos coming out to the physical interface.

  What we did that fixed it was to add the VLAN physics to the list of allowed VLANS labeled on firewall connected switch ports. As if by magic the physics I / f to the Normal State, as did all the local VIRTUAL network interfaces, and we started to get statistics on the State of the output of the show fail command section.

  And yet a capture on any of the interfaces VLAN does still not show the Hellos, and a capture on the physical displays now the bidirectional Hello for the physical LAN. Weird.

  So my questions are:

  1 > why the VLAN interfaces are dependent on their physical I / f for failover. I was told that you need not have any IP or configured for physical integrity, nameif I / f it's just must be enabled for the VLAN I / fs to work.

  2 > how are the VLAN I / f passing Hellos to the other.

  I can include my config if that helps.

  Peter

  Peter,

  (1) why is a good question. AFAIK that is according to the doc (same link below)

  "When you set up failover for an interface VLAN, Hello packets are sent through the physical interface, so the physical interface must be configured with an ip address."

  (2) I don't think that they are:

  One of the guides

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/sw/secursw/ps2120/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a0080172786.html

  "Note that failover is supported with VIRTUAL local network interfaces. But the failover LAN interface command does not support VIRTUAL local network interfaces or failover link commands. "

  So basically it looks like helo packets are sent only on physical interfaces (dumped on any vlan you put them) and the VLAN will be "failover" If the pix, but if you had a failure in one vlan particular the pix would not notice it until the vlan the physical interface has been awarded to failed.

  Of course, it works in the equivalent level of the FWSM code - but FWSM never had the physical interfaces.

  The train 7.x supports subinterfaces, obviously.

  -Jason

  Please rate this message if it helps!

• With the help of two CAN channels on cRIO with 9853

  I have a cRIO 9014 controller RT and 9112 chassis and a CAN Module 9853.  I used successfully CAN receive and channel CAN Transmit example projects to check the work of material.  Then, I took two screws FPGAS of each project and grouped in a single FPGA VI by copying just the two in the same VI.  I can correctly transmit and receive with the host live

  My goal now is to be able to use the two CAN channels on the module 9853 for transmitting and receiving CAN Messages on each channel.  I like to use in a project in hybrid Mode later, so I think that there is only a single DMA channel available after that Scan Engine takes 2.  Maybe that's why I get an error when I make a copy of everything in the FPGA VI, make a new FIFO and make copies renowned host of screws with different names of variables to match the copied content from FPGA VI.

  Any other ideas on how to proceed would be appreciated.

  Also, I know that CAN1 needs an external power supply, so it is no more a problem.

  Thank you

  John

  I thought about it, I don't know why, but some parts with part 'FPGA to receive channel CAN' in their own lines fixed.  Now CAN receive is as fast as can be, never drop frames or overflowing the FIFO.  He also compiled FPGA Bitfile 30% faster and was about 50% less use of the device.  Weird...

  If you're curious, here's the new VI:

  

  John

• What are the bare minimum commands to get a stack of PC6825 3 - switch with inter switch Link Aggregation?

  I am brand new to PowerConnect switches, even though I am familiar with the concepts of VLANS, aggregation of links and spanning tree.

  I am on a deadline to get some new ones installed 6248 in our baskets and get them functioning as a stack. What are the bare minimum commands for:

  • Three switches in a stack (master/Eve/member)
  • 2 ports grouped between each (total redundancy) switch with loops WITHOUT switching

  All the switches are running firmware v3.3.9.1 (January 2014).

  Thank you

  The range of interface Ethernet 1/g1-1 / g2 allows you to select the ports you want in the channel of the port. Page 293

  Channel-group 1 Auto mode to create 440 lacp lag page

  Select the Group of channels with interface port-channel 1

  Switchport page 601 in trunk mode

  Switchport trunk allowed vlan [VLAN you use]

  http://FTP.Dell.com/manuals/all-products/esuprt_ser_stor_net/esuprt_powerconnect/PowerConnect-6248_Reference%20Guide_en-us.PDF

• Evaluate the NSX with VLAN

  Second question about the VLAN:

  Is there a reason that would prevent it from doing an assessment of NSX deployment on VLAN?

  We have a set C7000 enclosure with 16 blades G6 and 4 Flex-10 switches, which we removed from production. Before deploy us NSX "the right way", we would evaluate NSX on the old blades. I have no problem to create clusters of edge, calculation and Mgmt, but I couldn't do a deployment of best practices of NSX without leaf spine VLAN (unless the boss wants to invest in 4 HP more Flex-10 switches for evaluating!).

  My idea: create a VLAN "backbone" and 3 "leaf VLAN," all with MTU 1600 or better and start creating our documentation run-book for the NSX.

  THX in advance

  Yes, you can do a deployment with VLANS and it will work. You will be able to use Distributed firewall, Distributed routing (some design considerations apply here) and many other features. Of course you need to master them VLAN for the virtual machine to each host if you do not use an overlay.

  Nikhil

  / cc: NimishDesai. maxard66 rbudavari

• Virtual switch with virtual bases DMZ

  Hi all

  trying to wrap my hands around it.  Sure you can have an ESXi installation without creating a virtual switch OK?  I have a scenario where they have 3 all current hosts to run ESXi 5.x.  It have a physical NIC card which is plugged in the demilitarized zone on the firewall and another NETWORK card inside network.  They want to get up some virtual machines in the DMZ.  I was under the impression that if dididn can't you have a virtual switch with a virtual DMZ then it would be a security risk.  Is the separate physical NIC enough?

  Thanks in advance!

  It doesn't matter what you need a virtual switch in order to have something to connect to the VM too.  If you like inside the network and a DMZ network then you can set up a separate virtual switch for each NETWORK card, that way you have separation virtual switch and physical NIC.  This way VM is placed only on the demilitarized zone would only speak and other DMZ VM inside VM is placed on the virtual switch inside would only speak to those.  Because of the way virtualization works it should be not to mention and the operating system is not between the two.  Now if that's enough, it's your security staff.  Some COMPUTER security requires a complete physical separation of workloads DMZ, some require only virtual separation.

• WHY MAKE TWO COPIES OF EMAILS THAT I SEND IN MY OUTBOX

  SAME AS MOST HIGH: WHY MAKE TWO COPIES OF EMAILS THAT I SEND IN MY OUTBOX

  I guess that your account is Outlook.com or Gmail. These two put mail in your Outbox and Thunderbird does.

  If it's an of these, go to menu (alt + T) tools > account settings > copies and folders and change your sent does not save a copy in.

• My Ipad air2 does not start.  Tried hold it together switch with on/off switch.  Apple logo appears for about 15 seconds and then turns off again.

  My Ipad air2 does not start.  Tried hold it together switch with on/off switch.  Apple logo appears for about 15 seconds and then turns off again.

  Is there another way to start the IPAD?

  Try the steps here:

  https://support.Apple.com/en-us/HT201412

• that either the app can make me drawing on a photo with a pen?

  that either the app can make me drawing on a photo with the stylus? I tried with Picsay Pro, but I couldn't find the pen function. Are there any suggestions?

  If you have installed Evernote you can also send your project to Evernote and possibly save with this app.

• Calibration use four 8960 with GPIB, sometimes delay ibwrt of service more than 200ms

  We use four 8960 and four power with GPIB for calibration, his time is more than 30-40%. What can I do? Thank you!

  There are features that allow you to write to several instruments. I don't remember the name of ib casual and I write my phone. You should always read sequentially. Otherwise, go to ethermet instruments.

• Ran Malwarebytes & two threats were each one with the same name: PUM. Disabled.SecurityCenter. fact that associated with MSSE PUM & the boxes unchecked in MS security Center.

  Original title: PUM. Disabled.SecurityCenter

  I recently removed "patch system" of my Dell computer XP. Malwarebyte s was the only software to do. MSSE caught, but couldn't fix it. I then updated & ran MSSE on my Toshiba - no threats not found. I then ran Malwarebytes & two threats were each one with the same name: PUM. Disabled.SecurityCenter both at the Date of the registry in HKLM\SOFTE\Microsfot\SecurityCenter\AntiVirusDisableNotify & HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsfot\securityCenterFirewallDisableNotify.  These two have been listed bad: Good (0) (1).  In the Malwarebytes wesite, I read that this has something to do with MSSE. In a commentary, he says it occurs if, in the MS Security Center, the notification "Notify me if my computer might be at risk because of my virus protection software settings" is unchecked.  I then went ahead & check all 3, firewalls, viruses & automatic updates. My computer seems to work well, except that the fan runs all the time (there are a lot of processes running & the CPU usage is very--often 100%, but the computer works fast).

  My questions are: 1) the PUM associated MSSE & the boxes unchecked in MS security Center; (2) should I click on "ignore" in the Malwarebytes scan? 3) was right to check all the boxes in the center of security - "altert me if my computer may be at rist b/c of my xxx software settings?  Thanks in advance for your help.

  PC fan2

  Hello

  (1) is associated with MSSE PUM & the boxes unchecked in MS security Center;

  The following thread might answer this question: http://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?showtopic=69859

  (2) should I click on "ignore" in the Malwarebytes scan?

  Yes

  3) was right to check all the boxes in the center of security - "altert me if my computer may be at rist b/c of my xxx software settings?

  Only, run antivirus software at the same time. Firewall must be performed, evil-ware bytes can be run at your pleasure.