#Missing formula Member for upper level members should not aggregate?

Similar Questions

• When I "manually export level zero data", I get a few upper level members

  I found that the export of level zero behaves differently over time. in our OSI 11.1.1.3 number cube, Feb. 4 EAS has exported only zero-level data when I "manually export level zero data. On 25 February, limbs stored exporting EAS with formula as well as the members of level as a Total, total compensation salary (when I manually 'export data to zero"). Why is this?

  In OSB, you export level zero blocks - i.e. at level zero in all sparse dimensions. Export may still contain high-level dense dimension members.

  Why it seems to me change over time, I'm not sure. Maybe to do with the question of whether data had been calculated when export has been run?

• For automatic indexing loop should not index empty array

  Hi guys,.

  I wanted to say in this VI remove empty elements in the table. He worked for table 1 d, but as soon as I gave him a table 2D, for some reason that I was unable to remove empty elements:

  

  

  sdfsdfsdfadgadf wrote:

  So when I was debugging, I saw at the 3rd row and 4th iteration of line, out of the inside OF the terminal loop index outter loop is [].

  Should not the terminal of the index of the outer loop treat [] as 'skip it '?

  In this case, the tunnel of indexation in the outer loop takes an empty 1-d array and adds it as a line to the 2D table. Because the 2D tables can not be serrated, it fills the remaining elements of the line (all) with the default value. Maybe we could say that an empty array should mean 'add all', but this behavior goes back very far and I don't know what effect this would have. As mentioned, it is easy enough to do what you want with a conditional append in the outer loop.

  sdfsdfsdfadgadf wrote:

  I mean what you described certainly applies if [] a something, but in this case it didn't. To prove the point, try something like this:

  

  Check the size of the table. You will find that it is 3,0,0. In other words, you have 3 pages, each with an empty 2D array, which is exactly what builds your code.

  I try to avoid dealing with > 2D paintings and which deals with the cases where they can be empty, so I don't remember the details of why this happens, but IIRC, it follows the rules of the system.

• WebCenter Navigation | Upper level nodes do not pick up the change of locale

  Hi all
  
  I am facing a problem with the beams of model and default navigation resources in WebCenter. (I tested in PS3 and PS4)
  
  I've implemented a change language menu which changes the settings regional managed user in a bean method. I used beams of resources of high level and the second level pages using the value by defect-navigation - model .xml. Here is my test case.
  
  (1) default application language is English
  Top level 2) as well as its child page is both showing English values (picked up from resource group)
  (3) use a language selector down to change the language of the application in Hindi (I replaced the method of calculateLocale() of CustomViewHandler class to apply this logic)
  (4) the second level in the navigation page begins to pick up the Hindi of resource group value, but the first level page still has the old English value.
  
  Even if I refresh the whole page with F5 or ctrl + F5, the top-level page does not reflect the new language.
  
  Does anyone have an idea why this is happening? I don't do any special implementation for the second level (partial trigger etc.), but what I have to do something for the first level?
  
  Thank you
  Prashant

  Hello.

  You must force to reevaluate the EL Expressions and invalidate cache SiteResources because WebCenter is cached Navigation model.
  The best multilingual for me is based on Phase ADF earpiece to force the phase of "prepareModel" when you change language. PrepareModel phase must invalidate SiteResource cache to force assess the EL Expressions.

  You have a multilingual sample based on ADF Phase listener downloadable here http://danielmerchanoracle.blogspot.com.es/2011/09/multi-lenguaje-en-una-aplicacion-de.html. In addition, it is a long explain on that (but it's in Spanish ;)).

  Blog entry: http://danielmerchanoracle.blogspot.com.es/2011/09/multi-lenguaje-en-una-aplicacion-de.html
  Example of direct download: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/46128268/Oracle%20WebCenter%20Samples/WCPortalTraduccion.rar

  Kind regards.

  Published by: Daniel Merchan on 13-Apr-2012 14:06

• Storage for Non option sheet dimension level members: store vs dynamic calc

  Hi all
  
  What is the general rule regarding the options of storage for leaf-level members? I think that it should be dynamic Calc under normal circumstances and have in store if we are going to load data in the leaf level no. Is this correct? Are there other aspects while defining members?
  
  Thank you and best regards,
  
  Amol

  Don't forget to consider whether the dimension is dense or sparse. Dynamic calcs generally much higher level work on dense dimensions as long as you are not data entry in senior level members. High level dynamic calcs in sparse dimension CAN work well, but more often on smaller dimensions. It really depends on what you pass in your cube. On scattered large, higher levels are almost always, but it's one of those areas where you can sometimes bend the rules.

  Also, be sure to consider the calc of the implications of doing something, stored or dynamic.

  -Jake

• Alias for the shared members in Smartview

  Hi gurus,

  I use Oracle EMP 11.1.2.3. I've migrated a planning 11.1.2.2 EPMA demand 11.1.2.3. The Alias for the shared members are not displayed when I go via Smartview, instead, is to show as [Parent]. [child]. But when I access the same application in 11.1.2.2, I can see the Alias.

  How to solve this problem?

  He was identified as a bug reading of this Oracle - Hyperion... Labs: Smart View issues with another hierarchy - Surprises in the fifth part of Essbase

  Concerning

  Celvin

  http://www.orahyplabs.com

• 11.1.2.3, clean the existing UDA Member, members should have no UDA at all.

  Hello

  (Essbase 11.1.2.3)

  I want to clean the existing of the UDA member (account), so that in the end there is no UDA at all.

  The docu says:

  "Note: to delete a UDA value, UDA allow the changesof use and, in the data source, leave the field empty UDA".

  https://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E24674_01/EPM.1112/eas_help/frameset.htm?ruleuda.html

  However I can't do...

  Tried the following in the data file: (I have not tested with a SQL source yet)

  Member (Level0), UDA (level (0)

  K12345 < tab >

  «K12345 < tab >»»

  K12345 < tab > < white >

  «K12345 < tab >»»

  K12345 < tab > < white > < tab >

  K12345 < tab > "«< tab >»»

  Also changed the separator of < tab > to ';' and tried all the top once again.

  I always get the message "Success" after the Sun load, but remain still the already existing UDA. When I give him a "dummy" UDA (for example "noUDA' in the data drop these UDA value replaces the existing (one or more).) However I don't want stuff like "dummy" in the otl.

  Someone at - it a trick?

  Thanks in advance!

  André

  Hi Andy - I just test this with a parent-child file against the size of the Sample.Basic market in 11.1.2.3.505, and it worked for me it is empty. Structure of the file is: Parent child UDA

  In the properties to build a global profile, I selected the market then checked "Allow changes to property" and "allow modifications of UDA.

  In properties to build the size of the field of the UDA, I put the dimension of 'Market', domain type UDA, and I also checked 'Delete when the field is empty' (it's all the way down the list of field properties, under 'Ignore the field for Dimension Build').

  Since you mention it, I wonder if you missed this last step?

• Formula member to count the number of members to particular generation

  Hello
  
  I write a formula for Member for a member in the account dimension to count the 5th generation of the entity dimension members and store the number as a value.
  
  I wrote the suite as a member formula:
  
  @COUNT (@GENMBRS("Entity",5));
  
  but the formula above are validated.
  
  Please help me with this...
  
  Thank you and best regards,
  AK
  
  Published by: user7313165 on July 29, 2010 01:52
  
  Published by: user7313165 on July 29, 2010 02:04

  If your revised formula is in fact exactly as you wrote it in your message, you cut the main @. In Sample.Basic a new Member of measure dimension dynamic calc with formula "@COUNT (SKIPNONE, @GENMBRS (market, 3));" valid and recovers.

• I can't open my apps in creative cloud; whenever I get the trial version and the question to purchase. But I am a member for several years now. We have already removed all apps and installed them, but it does not work. What should do?

  ?  I can't open my apps in creative cloud; whenever I get trial versions and the question to purchase. But I am a member for several years now. We have already removed all apps and installed them, but it does not work. What should do?

  Troubleshooting FAQ: What should I do if I have a subscription, but my application acts as if I had a trial?

• Create new Parent Member for current members

  Hello
  I have a rookie question for you. I have version 9.3.1.
  
  We have a dimension that has a number of related members. I want to create a new Member parent for these related members, using planning, screen size. I can do that, and the data will go with it? Can I cut and paste the members or the buttons they will move into alignment?
  
  Thank you

  No data will be affected until you refresh to essbase data will remain against members when you move, you will probably need to recalculate totals.

  See you soon

  John
  http://John-Goodwin.blogspot.com/

• I did all my selections for feathering, but should not be. What step am I missing?

  I did all my selections of pen, but should not be. What step am I missing?

  Please provide more information. What are you doing?

• Qustion formula Member

  Hello
  
  Here is the part of the Member for my cube of bso formula:
  
  IF (((@ISMBR("1234") == #Missing) or (@ISMBR("1234") == 0)))
  
  "5670" = "Income before tax" * 0.32445;
  ANOTHER ((@ISMBR("1234") <>, 0) OR (@ISMBR("1234") <>#Missing))
  '5670' = #Missing;
  End
  
  I mean, if GL 1234 is missing or 0, then GL 5670 is calculated using this. However it doesn't seem to work, 5670 is filled with the value of GL1234 is set.
  
  I want 5670 calculates the value GL1234 is missing or 0
  
  I'm missing here?
  
  Thank you
  
  Published by: Donny 28 Sep, 2012 12:58
  
  Published by: Donny 28 Sep, 2012 13:00
  
  Published by: Donny 28 Sep, 2012 13:00
  
  Published by: Donny 28 Sep, 2012 13:00

  No problem! For the latter, again I think this is a case of not having the "@ISMBR". Essbase provides a built-in function for this test, called @ISDESC - see http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17236_01/epm.1112/esb_tech_ref/isdesc.html.

  So you should do something like this:

  IF ((("1234" == 0) OR ("1234" == #Missing)) AND NOT (@ISDESC("HR")))
  

  I was also a little more explicit with the brackets, I know it is not always necessary, but I'm too lazy to memorize the rules of priority etc..  :)

• Calculation of low level members

  Hi all
  I want to add the formula for low level member and I want to keep the storage as dynamic calculation type
  so that its values can be calculated from the meber of high level.
  
  But during this operation, I get this error
  "Data storage cannot be set to label only, dynamic Calc or dynamic Calc and store for periods in Multicurrency."
  
  and the members of lower level storage type is automatically changed to store.
  
  Can anyone suggest me how can I calculate the value of the Member at a lower level by using the values of members toplevel?
  
  Thank you

  Hi, Mirka, what version of hyperion and what OS are you using?

  Thank you.

• Level members sheet showing as EXPAND

  In my application, Hyperion classic schedule - manage the Dimensions, my leaf-level members are icon next to them.

  This development should appear only for intermediate Parents and not of members at the leaf level.

  Any possible root cause? /

  We are on 11.1.2.3.500 - it IS because of this version OPTION - creating members on the fly?

  Thank you and best regards.

  Just the way it works with the ADF, boring functionality

  11.1.2.3

  

  11.1.2.4

  

  See you soon

  John

• Formula member of Smart View

  Hello
  
  Can someone tell me how to see memebr smartview formula 11.1.2.1.?
  I have opened the online form and select the Member that formula and clicked on the formula of Member under "more."
  The page has just made a nod, I couldn't see anything other than...
  
  Thank you very much

  Is ownership of "Member formula" activated for dimension with the formula in the form design, if it is not then in theory you should not be able to view the formulas in Smart View.

  See you soon

  John
  http://John-Goodwin.blogspot.com/