For automatic indexing loop should not index empty array

Hi guys,.

I wanted to say in this VI remove empty elements in the table. He worked for table 1 d, but as soon as I gave him a table 2D, for some reason that I was unable to remove empty elements:

sdfsdfsdfadgadf wrote:

So when I was debugging, I saw at the 3rd row and 4th iteration of line, out of the inside OF the terminal loop index outter loop is [].

Should not the terminal of the index of the outer loop treat [] as 'skip it '?

In this case, the tunnel of indexation in the outer loop takes an empty 1-d array and adds it as a line to the 2D table. Because the 2D tables can not be serrated, it fills the remaining elements of the line (all) with the default value. Maybe we could say that an empty array should mean 'add all', but this behavior goes back very far and I don't know what effect this would have. As mentioned, it is easy enough to do what you want with a conditional append in the outer loop.

sdfsdfsdfadgadf wrote:

I mean what you described certainly applies if [] a something, but in this case it didn't. To prove the point, try something like this:

Check the size of the table. You will find that it is 3,0,0. In other words, you have 3 pages, each with an empty 2D array, which is exactly what builds your code.

I try to avoid dealing with > 2D paintings and which deals with the cases where they can be empty, so I don't remember the details of why this happens, but IIRC, it follows the rules of the system.

Tags: NI Software

Similar Questions

  • Automatic indexation 2D array in the loop For - what is happening?

    I found many sources dealing 1 d tables in a loop For or a While loop, using automatic indexing, but nothing on the tables of higher order.

    I work with a program that feeds a 2D array in a loop (see table).  From what I see, it looks like this the results of automatic indexing in a 1 d, the first column of table 2-D table.

    This is the expected behavior, and it would hold true for arrays of higher order, table 3D for example?

    Is it possible to refer to the second column rather than the first?

    wildcatherder wrote:

    I found many sources dealing 1 d tables in a loop For or a While loop, using automatic indexing, but nothing on the tables of higher order.

    I work with a program that feeds a 2D array in a loop (see table).  From what I see, it looks like this the results of automatic indexing in a 1 d, the first column of table 2-D table.

    N ° it auto-index through a line at a time table.  You will get a 1 d table which consists of all of the columns that make up each row in each iteration.

    This is the expected behavior, and it would hold true for arrays of higher order, table 3D for example?

    Yes.  Automatic indexing on a 3D Board will give you a table on each iteration of each page 2D.

    Is it possible to refer to the second column rather than the first?  This question applies once you understand the first response.

  • #Missing formula Member for upper level members should not aggregate?

    I have some senior level members in an application of ASO that shouldn't have grouped in them values. I seem to remember that there is a formula for Member #Missing I can put each of these members to prevent aggregated values. Does anyone know of such a formula of Member? Thank you

    Add a dummy Member under the parent

    Mother ~ (read only)

    Dummy member ~ (store)

    Ordinary child 1

    Ordinary child 2

    Ordinary child 3

    Just make sure that there is no data loaded against the fake member.

    Concerning

    Celvin

  • Keyboard shortcut for "automatic adjustment"?

    Well, my previous question was how to hide the controls of the workstation, it is how to adjust automatically to work without having to use the "Display" commands  Is there a keyboard shortcut for this?  Now that I can expand my computer window because the controls are hidden, the guest operating system window enlarges not inside the frame as soon as I expanded the framework.  So I just get black spaces within the framework where I the Office of OS client to expand and Fill in automatically.

    I would normally use Autofit for this, but the control is hidden.  Now the normal thing would be to have an "Accelerator" keyboard to adjust automatically, but still, I don't see it.

    Y at - it no help for it?

    Thank you.

    -Roger

    "Autofit Guest" and "Autofit Window" are persistent parameters.  If you select "Autofit Guest", then you can (with VMware Tools) should always resize when you resize the window.  There is not much to gain by having keyboard shortcuts for them because you should not be disabling them frequently.

    A keyboard shortcut for "Fit Guest Now" would be more useful (and I guess that's what you're referring in fact), but, no, there is no shortcut for that either. (What you see in the menus, it's what you get). If you really want you can try to do an editor resources (e.g., Resource Hacker), vmware.exe of opening and editing of the accelerator table to add a shortcut key for the menu item 'Fit Guest Now', but this isn't something that we can support.

  • MOTOBLUR - ERROR ADDING THE ACCOUNT, USER NAME MUST NOT BE EMPTY...?

    Hello

    So here's my story... Today I decided to do a factory restore my world since I had seen some lag and thought that because I download as much just applications test and then uninstall them some 'basket' must have slept on my phone, causing my system to lag... I have provided zero factory, and everything was going well until the moment where I had to connect my motoblur account. When I logged on facebook, I noticed that instead of the Nice welcome message were characteristic of fb motoblur it just went to a cache of page that explains just read success!, I went and clicked done and then the same thing happened to twitter, but I thought everything was fine... I went and installed a few applications on the market, the top of the screens and other things and when I added my Social status widget I noticed it says to add a SOCIAL NETWORK (as if I had not added a network already)... I clicked on accounts and went on the facebook account, I had already logged in and noticed that the username is blank and the password used *... I clicked on save and got a message saying: ERROR ADD ACCOUNT. USER name SHOULD NOT BE EMPTY... same with my Twitter... and I can't sign in to any service motoblur...

    need help here since I use motoblur much... should I factory reset again?

    Thanks in advance!

    G

    UPDATE: HARD RESET FIXED!

  • How do I loop stops then automatically indexed table is connected to the index of the loop = 0

    I connected an array of 5 elements of a loop FOR with indexed auto activated (FOR the index of the loop is not no conthe second), IE after iteration 5 0-4 loop ends automatically ... HOW he gets himself finished?

    I have attached the image of refrence

    http://digital.NI.com/public.nsf/allkb/76895DA6D9BFE6B586256F7000745561

    http://CNX.org/content/m12221/latest/

    find the tutorial for how a for loop works decide the Iteration Count When Multiple Auto-Indexed entry bays are present?

  • Automatic indexing does not as soon as the first element of the array.

    Hello

    I have a state machine that uses automatic indexing in most of his State to write the registry to set the part for some test.  When the state machine reaches the section 'Now playing' (the fourth State, second battery sequence) I have a picture of two equal elements related to looping for to write the required registers for this specific test.  When I enter the current state read the the first address is the second element of the array which is '1' location and not the first address that must be '0 '.  I closed the program and restarted LabVIEW but I always get the second element in this loop that maintain the form part works correctly and I get an error because the first element turns on the chip.  Is there something I'm not see when it comes to self that he would keep from starting at the first element of indexing?  Please take a look and let me know what I can do wrong.  I have attached the main program and the print loop results screens and test probe.  Any help will be great.  It worked last week.

    I don't see no problem at all when I copy the loop in an another VI in order to run it. Your jpg shows nothing on the values of the probe.

  • Through tunnels of automatic indexation to write data files?

    Hello

    I use neither-controller to control a servo and position and torque data collection. I want to write data to the TDMS files.

    Recently, I learned about the design of producer/consumer model and I thought it would be a good approach to ensure that writing the files didn't slow down my timed loop of data collection.

    However, I also realized that my program seems to work well if I wire the data that I collect the tunnels of automatic indexation. Can I use a structure that executes only after the entire collection of data is made to write the charts that I built to TDMS files.

    Is there a reason that would make the last method against? Can the tunnels of idexing auto slow my loop enough to concern him? I collect only about 5,000 points of data for each channel.

    See you soon,.

    Kenny

    In my opinion, the main consideration is timing.  If you use consumers/producers, you essentially make writing while the data collection process is "pending" the next item to collect.  It should be the case that the consumption will be faster than production, so at any time, 99% of the data are already written, Yes (perhish forbid!) if the program crashes, you already have most of the data on the disk. fo

    Alternatively, you can use the tunnels and send an array of 5000 points (from the tunnel exit) for the writing process.  This requires it to be rather than parallel series - no writing occurs until all the 5000 points are generated, and the writing process, instead of is almost as soon as it starts, takes 5000 times longer (more or less).

    The series is 'simpler', especially for a beginner.  The producer/consumer, if you understand the design model, would be my preference.

    BS

  • Tunnel of automatic indexing problem

    I have a data acquisition program that uses an Auto-Indexed Tunnel in a loop to process and display data in a table 1 d.  The program behaves strangely with the first value in the array (the point where the program worked, in a few seconds).  13 other values in the table all correct update, but the value of time always shows approximately the same number.  The loop is scheduled to update the front values once per second.  If I use a table outside of the loop Index block For to get the value of time out of the matrix, I get the correct value for time increments upward by about a second each time that the loop runs.

    So basically, when the value of time is passed through the auto-index Tunnel, its output fluctuates up and down a few tenths of seconds each time the loop is executed (remaining to a single value... usually about 90, even if it changes each time I run), instead of starting with 0 and increases with time as the summer running program.

    I'm under LabVIEW 8.5.1

    Thank you

    Sam

    Because I have no data acquisition installed, I can not tell what is the size of the array is, but if it is greater than 14, the later elements overwrite time because 0 is also the default value. For safety, I add another case (empty) (e.g. - 1) and make it the default.

    A lot of things very unwise, for example in the dataHCC.vi 'calculate', you add an empty array in the table. This really does not something useful, right?

  • What is the physical meaning of automatic indexing of table entry...

    What is the physical interpretation of the automatic indexing. ?

    You wire up a table on the edge of a loop, it sequentially will index the table for you as he travels the loops. A While loop will also do this, but it is much more common on loops For, therefore, loops For making automatically while the While loops must be 'right click' and said to the index in the array. Get it?

  • loop for and while loop with empty table entry

    Hello

    I have a question with loop and loop.

    When a constant empty array (zero element) is connected to the loop For with "allowing the index", there are no interactions performed in loop For. But, if the loop is replaced by any loop, no problem.

    LabVIEW 2010

    Hello

    It is ok. I have no problem at all.

    For the 'loop' For when you connect the table thanks to indexing, the number of iterations is set to the size of the array. The iteration number assigned to N (in your case 10) is ignored.

    For the 'While' loop the number of iteration is defined by the Boolean Condition and the size of the array is ignored.

    Paul

  • Is what ODP should not be 64-bit for the 64-bit, and 64 oracle bones

    Underside of thread is ODP.Net

    Is what ODP should not be 64-bit for the 64-bit, and 64 oracle bones

    Is what ODP should not be 64-bit for the 64-bit, and 64 oracle bones

    Hi gurus,

    Oracle Data Provider for .NET - http://download.oracle.com/otn/other/ole-oo4o/ODTwithODAC1110720.zip

    Is above PACO is compatible with
    OS - windows 2003 (64-bit)
    Oracle - 10.2.0.1 (64 bit of business ed.)

    Thank you

    Hi user;

    I believe you can download the tool at the bottom of the link and you can use:
    http://www.Oracle.com/technetwork/database/Windows/downloads/index-090165.html

    Respect of
    HELIOS

  • No data found for SPARC index in table type

    I've been teting with code below
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    declare

    type int_tab_type is table of rowtype index of directory % oe_order_headers_all;
    n1_tab int_tab_type;

    Start

    Select * bulk collect into n1_tab
    of oe_order_headers_all
    where rownum < 10;

    n1_tab. Delete (2);
    n1_tab. Delete (5);
    n1_tab. Delete (6);
    n1_tab. Delete (8);

    I'm IN n1_tab.first... n1_tab. Last
    loop
    dbms_output.put_line (' index: ' | i);
    dbms_output.put_line (' order number: ' | n1_tab (i) .order_number);
    end loop;
    exception
    while others then
    dbms_output.put_line (SQLERRM);
    end;
    ------------------------------
    After that, as expected, I got the error ORA-01403: no data available for the index value 2.
    I know "indices of ' but I do not know how to use it with FOR loop.
    I want to know is possible to loop through the type of table for only those clues where some value exists.

    Please advice.

    Thank you
    Vishalaksha
    declare
    
    type int_tab_type is table of oe_order_headers_all%rowtype index by binary_integer;
    n1_tab int_tab_type;
    
    begin
    
    select * bulk collect into n1_tab
    from vin1234
    where rownum <10;
    
    n1_tab.delete(2);
    n1_tab.delete(5);
    n1_tab.delete(6);
    n1_tab.delete(8);
    
    FOR i IN n1_tab.first..n1_tab.last
    loop
    if n1_tab.exists(i) then
    dbms_output.put_line('index: '||i);
    dbms_output.put_line('Order Number: '||n1_tab(i).order_number);
    end if;
    end loop;
    exception
    when others then
    dbms_output.put_line(SQLERRM);
    end;
    

    can it be done?

    Published by: Khaled Aradhye, February 11, 2010 21:54

  • Automatic indexation shows that partial data

    Hello world

    Please see the attachment.  I added notes where the data are reported missing.  I know this has something to do with automatic indexing and I spent a bit of time to read about it and try different things, but I really need help now please.

    Thank you!


  • Win7 x 64 native driver for the OfficeJet 6110 does not recognize the element of automatic duplex unit add-on unit

    After upgrading my laptop Lenovo T61 to Windows 7 x 64, I find that my OfficeJet 6110 unit automatic duplexer is not recognized.  The duplexer has worked flawlessly for 3 years under Windows XP, but apparently he is not recognized with Win7 x 64 native driver.  The auto duplexer unit is a standard HP brand option for this printer.

    The printer is connected to a USB hub, which is connected to my laptop.  The duplexer works fine when reconnected to a XP operating system with the pack of HP software/driver installed.

    Y at - it a trick to make the add-on unit unit duplex automatic, recognized and functional element in Win7?

    Thank you!

    Hello
    Enter the control panel > devices and printers.
    Right-click the printer icon, and then click printer properties.
    Click the device settings tab.
    As installed in Duplex Automatic Two-Sided accessory and then click OK to save the change.

    Automatic duplex printing should now available.

    Kind regards
    Shlomi

Maybe you are looking for