More rapid effect "lightsaber".

Well, I know the lightsaber effect where you flatten the effects of lightning and cut the film, but I need a faster way to do it.

The program's Premiere Elements 7.0.

THX

There could be some useful tips in this TUTORIAL.

Also, I think that the SFX will go a long way to help with the illusion. Here is a link to SFX Group (music) files. Some are free and some are for sale:

http://www.stevengotz.com/audio.htm

http://www.FindSounds.com/ISAPI/search.dll

http://www.Freesound.org/index.php

http://www.a1freesoundeffects.com/

http://www.ljudo.com/default.asp?lang=tEnglish&do=it

http://www.Sounddogs.com/

http://www.SoundSnap.com/

http://www.stock20.com/commerce/index.php

http://www.Shockwave-sound.com/index.html

http://www.SmartSound.com

http://www.ilovewavs.com/effects/music/music.htm

http://www.Jamendo.com/en/albums

http://www.5alarmmusic.com/

http://www.studiocutz.com/

http://www.partnersinrhyme.com/

http://www.Newgrounds.com/audio/

http://www.soundclick.com/bands/default.cfm?bandID=180598

http://www.Soundrangers.com/

http://www.muvipix.com

Good luck

Hunt

Tags: Premiere

Similar Questions

  • Lumetri: Two and more Lumetri effects on a clip

    If I have more than one lumetri effect on a clip (i.e. for the secondary color correction with masks)

    I can only change the last effect in lumetri added in the Panel of lumetri!

    Also if the other effect of lumetri is selected in the effect options.

    Is there a work around?

    Nesting the clip before adding the second Lumetri.

  • more low effect of arc text

    is there a different way to a text bow vertical lines below letters remain vertical?

    wilson bulldog ice hockey.jpg

    Mesh points must be visible when the object is selected and can be edited with the "Mesh Tool" (U) or (A) direct Selection tool. If you have never changed the mesh points, they act differently from standard anchor points Bezier. They have 4 direction points (3, if the edge points).

    The direct Selection tool can also edit the mesh points, but can not add points as can "Mesh tool.

    Edit:

    Oh, I just realized, you must use the "Warp" effect instead of the method of the "envelope to". Try the method of the "envelope" for more control.

  • Sequence to sequence more recent effects of old routine?

    Hey guys!

    Kind of complicated issue which I hope has a simple solution.

    I have a sequence of two hours that was published in first CS6. While I was finalizing the edit, I had someone doing color work on the piece in the Magic Bullet in first CC. Now that the edition is complete, there is a difference of ~ 25 minutes between one sequence and the other, related to small changes, medium changes and entire scenes being deleted. The two reference sequences the same media.

    Is it possible to quickly apply the work of the color of its sequence (as effects applied to each element) to the new sequence with the changes that we want?

    Thanks much for any help you can provide!

    Hi ctbckdrptrn,

    Yes, you must do it manually. There is no automatic way to reach this workflow.

    Kind regards

    Vinay

  • Lightsaber effect - how do you think what ILM at - it?

    I don't think that all of us would disagree that the laser swords made by people like Ryan Wieber looks something like lightsaber ILM (lucasfilm).

    Let's look at this in a little more detail...

    I'll ignore the episodes 4 to 6 (1970) because they have not been manufactured using technology, and thus we can hardly hope to achieve these effects as we use technology.

    Thus, the series prequel, episodes 1-3 (2000) is what interests me.

    The Phantom Menace:

    Screen shot 2011-06-01 at 17.48.54.png

    These swords are very organic looking. They seem to be made up of some sort of system that uses the transfer mode "Add", "Screen", which I was using in the two upcoming movies.

    The color on the sabres is sophisticated enough - much more pleasant AND realistic that all 'Color Correction' used in the tutorials for After Effects lightsaber.

    I don't know these tools specifically, but I guarantee you that they did some motion tracking, some roto work (probably automatic because they can afford it) then added some blur and used for blending modes to create the effect. They can come with their own plug-ins Glow, but any light is generated by a blur applied to a shape using a blending mode.

    Here it's not how they did, because you are probably not using the same tools, but how can recreate you the effect as simply and easily as possible. The technique I did a demo in the video is my version of a manifesto years by Alex Lindsay , who is a friend of mine (who who also worked for ILM at the same time). Compositing digital all the traces its roots to John Knoll , who was one of the designers of Photoshop of origin and who also worked at ILM. It's all math applied to the pixels.

    Discover how Photoshop works with channels, colors and blending modes, so you will be able to understand how the After Effects or any compositing application. Simply following tutorials that use a specific plug-in won't teach you not much more than a possible use of the plug-in to achieve the effect shown. Do some experiments with the basics using nothing but the blur, blending modes and channel command (levels, curves, etc.) and you'll be well on your way to being a guru of EI. Then you can refine your technique and your eye so that all your effects are credible.

  • Effect of more realistic market...

    I have a clip where the talent is on foot along a path in the background (filmed in front of a green screen). I currently have the scale of nearly 70% to 90% for a few seconds to give the impression that the actress is following the path. However, his feet seem to drag along the way. I'm looking to find out how to make it look more realistic. I'm a moderate after effects and first user, so I'm ready to try some more advanced effects if necessary. Any suggestions?

    No magic. Just a lot of extra keyframes. Change of the depth and the scale is not linear, but exponential function / linked the cosine of the lens. You just need to tweak a lot more, which is ultimately the point with any form of character animation.

    Mylenium

  • After effects 13.7.0.124 hangs when I try to make some compositions

    Hey Adobe Community! I need help.

    I am running After Effects 13.7.0.124 on my Mac El Capitan 10.11.3. I was able to render compositions quite well in the past, until the last two days. I don't know what changed, but there are some compositions when I hit record it gives me the spinning wheel of death and others who seem to make it ok. My guess is that something is wrong with some compositions, but I am confused that I was able to make them in the past, and I see no difference between those who fail and those who work. All the world running in this and any ideas for how to resolve or create workarounds? (I couldn't even copy and paste the data from the failing compositions in nine because this does not work too). Thank you very much!

    AHHH! I found it!

    So the answer to my other concern is Yes. You can have too many compositions. I had to get out of the parts that were deeply nested composition and pull them up. For example, if I had 'A Comp' in a larger "Comp B", I used sections of Comp B and then continuation and upward. So finally, there was a 'Comp P' where I really only necessary as a part of 'A Comp', but since I had compiled them all together like that earlier, EI had to dig deep to get the parts. So, as usual, it was my fault!

    I am SO relieved to find the answer to this. The project concerns an iOS design front end of an application give meal plans custom personalized people according to their diet and recipes using what they have.

    So in summary, nests too in AE. Take 2 minutes to get the right composition instead of the more rapid capture. That would have saved me 3 days of confusion.

  • Asks the plugin noise reduction effect-made clip jerky and slow down after application?

    I apply an effect - the neat video Plugin to reduce noise. for some reason when I apply the effect, playback of the clip is really slow and jerky. Why is this?

    Hi Dragonsfire,

    I'm looking at the rendering time and it's extremely slow, like the clip is 30 secs long 2mins but render time estimate is like 3 hours! My laptop is not the fastest, but it is not no more ancient. Any suggestions on the reduction to make time-no understood them with a much more powerful computer!

    You have met one of the intensive more rendered effects on the stage of post-production. Sorry if you think that something goes wrong. Likely, that's fine, except that it takes very long time to process images with that plugin.

    Here are some tips on the neat video forum:

    The real rendering for your clip speed should be around approximately 2 images per second. This value seems normal for a HD (1920 x 1080) image size and material to the average (you don't mention your hardware specifications). You can speed up a bit by disabling some of these filter options:

    • disable the very low freq, high quality options
    • some of the fixed noise reduction in some or all channels amounts (luminance / chrominance or Y/Cr/Cb) and/or ranges of frequency at 0%
    • reduction of the time filter RADIUS
    • disable the option of adaptive filtering

    These measures allow the filter a little faster, but at the expense of the quality of filtration reduced. Noise reduction is usually a compromise between quality and processing speed. When you need good quality, it makes sense to give some time to the process with the top of the settings page. When that is not necessary, you can use a less accurate and more rapid filtration.

    Thank you

    Kevin

  • Toshiba Satellite U400-14Z upgrade to a faster processor - which is the most rapid possible?

    Hello.

    I want to upgrade an old Toshiba Satellite U400-14Z (http://www.toshiba.eu/discontinued-p...lite-u400-14z/) a little by changing the CPU. Initially there is a processor Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 with FSB to 1066 MHz but I thought to put there P9700 or P9500. It seems that they are similar, specification is exactly, except the speed and the amount of memory cache level 2. The question is: would this work?
    I also found CPU called T9900, which is the fastest of the family. However, T-line requires more power than the line P, 25W to 35W in comparison. Is it possible that she would work in this phone?
    Maybe there's even some CPU more Rapids that would fit. Y at - it all? I'm looking for the maximum possible speed.
    Thank you for the answers.

    Concerning
    Lucas

    Posted by fel81
    Hello.

    Maybe there's even some CPU more Rapids that would fit. Y at - it all? I'm looking for the maximum possible speed.

    I found Intel® Core 2 Extreme Processor QX9300 who might be compatible. It has 4 cores and a thermal power of 45W design, compared to P8400 of TDP 25W. I suspect that the cooling of this laptop is insufficient to be able to disperse the money.

  • About update software - where is more readily available update file size indicated?  I have satellite internet (paying for GBs), live in a very rural area and need to plan the best cost/speed efficient location to perform the task.

    It's painful.  I thought I posted question already in the first search bar.  I don't understand why Apple in the description of software update in short does not show the size of the file.  I live very rural, have internet satellite and pay for GBS; I have to plan where it will be more cost effective speed. Am I missing a quick and easy answer?

    Also, can you recommend a management updates software APP where I can set the time to start and complete the download and installation. 02:00-08:00 Eastern time zone.  Thank you.

    Let them know by providing your comments

    Apple.com/Feedback

    the combo update is 1.47 GB

    https://support.Apple.com/kb/DL1859?locale=en_US

    as for your last question, no. I wouldn't use anything else that what already came with my mac to facilitate this.

  • Pavilion g series 1016-tx: with a burned (more likely) display card, I can't get done recovery without getting a blue screen

    Hello all, I have this old laptop that has one of these double called graphics cards. Unfortunately the ATI you won't work after a few years, I get blue screen when you try to start. I disabled the ATI display driver, and he worked well with the integrated INTEL card.

    And then I tried to restore the thing to factory default settings by using the Recovery Manager. Once more I am getting blue screen when you try to start, which means I can't get the recovery made. And this time I won't be able to boot in safe mode to disable the display driver.

    Any help?

    Hi @JonJon ,

    Welcome to the HP Forum! Is a great place to find answers and advice! You have the best experience on the HP forum, I would like to draw your attention to the Guide of the HP Forums. First time here? Learn how to publish and more.

    I understand that you have a failed graphics card that overcame you by turning off that one and using the integrated card, when you tried to perform a recovery, that he had failed as a result of the card, recovery won't work due to the fact that it tests the equipment prior to installation and of course it will detect the problem.  I don't know, but after talking with a colleague, you should be able to install from a disk of Windows, but I am not sure. You may be able to download Windows from the web, if this is not possible, it would be probably more cost-effective to replace Notepad.

    Please let me know if this information helps you solve the problem by marking this message as 'accept as Solution', this will help others easily find the information they seek. "In addition, by clicking on the" ""Twww.Mountainview.rsb.qc.ca Up ' below is a great way to say thank you!

  • Stereo field rotation effect STILL absent from the hearing.

    We could say that this is a feature request, but since it was part of the program, I consider it more of a bug.

    Until the program has been rewritten in 64-bit, hearing has an effect of imaging rotation stereo stereo field that allowed you to pan the stereo image to some degree in the left/center/right channels. This was and is different from the center channel option in the stereo Expander effect.

    If you look at the replaced elements, not implemented. Page of audition CS5.5 (features replaced, not implemented |) Audition CS5.5), you will see a bunch of stuff that was subsequently brought in the new version of the hearing. Even the stereo field rotation, one of the more simple effects, is still reported missing.

    It's really frustrating that I have to have two versions of the hearing on my computer, because this feature is one that I need for my music editing. It would be really nice to finally abandon this legacy version.

    It has been a few years now, since the transition. I would like to hear among developers Adobe what's still MIA of the novelties of the hearing, or who do I contact to get there.

    Use Stereo Field rotation numbers were very low, and we have not heard much demand for this purpose after the re - write.  A large part of the functionality of this effect can be duplicated through multitrack Automation as well, if the priority has never been high enough in any development previous cycle.  The issue of the backlog in our database is still open, however, and I'll make sure that your request is added to the comments.

  • Helps to create a more driven by police.

    Untitled-1.png

    Got me on this one and could use assistance or a link to some help to create an effect that I want to do. Have two letters, a D & G. What I would do is put the top or bottom of the G under the D to give it a more and effect. As a figure 8 If you understand what I mean. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance and I'm using CS6 perfectly up-to-date.

    I look in a layer mask and paint (or back on) the section of G, you want to appear 'behind' the D. You probably want to manipulate the shadow of D, so that it appears on the g at this time.

    Good luck and hope that helps.

    Hunt

  • Video effects missing in CS6 Mac

    I am a member of the creative cloud subscription and I install a Windows and Mac of CS6.

    The other day I went looking for a Zoom effect in the body that I was previously using Windows in my Mac installation and could not find it.

    Today I have bothered to check how it has been used, "Camera view", but it is not present on the Mac.

    Installing Windows also had more overall effects, i.e. feathers of edge.

    Under Windows I have all applications of CS6, on the Mac, I have installed only what I intend to use the body, AF, hearing and PS, could have a little more but not the dev web ones.

    What are the differences between CS6 Win & Mac or have I forgotten to install something.

    Thank you

    If you search for the string "Windows only" in the community help search, you will find all the features that a Windows of Premiere Pro version. There are a number of things not on Mac.

    See this post for more details: http://forums.adobe.com/message/3295811#3295811

  • After Effects CS6: Opinions on how to proceed with the change of resolution in a project

    I recently finished a project that I've been very proud of. The only problem was that I did all this in the bad resolution . I already found how to solve this problem so that this won't happen again, but the tricky part is to know how to convert my project as a whole in a higher resolution.

    My project consists of seven different compositions, rolled in a composition of master. Everything works fine except the resolution problem. I ended up changing each composition in my desired resolution, but then I resize issues with text, photos, effects, drawn in the 3d Department... more all effects are calibrated is no longer properly (an example would be initially on moved text and off-screen but covers only a short distance after the change of resolution).

    I've already reviewed all over again. I'm ok with this because it'll take me only a few days to duplicate everything. It may even be easier. However, if someone has an idea I would like to give it a shot. This would be an opportunity learning great anyway.

    To clarify, my initial project was made in the wrong resolution (720 x 480). (1920 x 1080) resolution change is fairly easy, but everything needs resizing and remade. Y at - it an easier way to convert a composition with all its effects, items, settings, etc. in another composition of a resolution more high without having to start over? Since it is also an opportunity of learning, if you think of something which pourrait work, then I would still hear it. I'm willing to try anything.

    You are probably best to do it again.

    720 x 480 is not only a much lower resolution, it is a format of 4 x 3.  1920 x 1080 is not HD, but also a 16: 9 aspect ratio screen.  It is wider.  You'd end up to take full advantage of the larger screen, reposition the graphics in your computer in any case.

    Consider it a lesson learned by checking the parameters of your computer until you start working seriously.

    There is a script that comes with newer versions of AE which will scale to the top of your comps if you choose to use it.  I've never had to use, so I forgot his name.  But it will not automatically forward to take advantage of the wide screen aspect ratio.

Maybe you are looking for