Motocast - not reliable

Similar Questions

• [PLEASE HELP] This cable or accessory is not reliable...

  I have recently (July 21) received a used iPhone that I bought online. Everything works like new, it's just that on the second day, the phone was telling me that the charger is not reliable, but it worked fine yesterday! Now, my phone does not load please help me on this!

  Thanks in advance (iPhone 5 s)

  -Kirsty

  Y at - it a brand name on the charger, there are many people who are not quality controlled or it could be damaged and can be a problem.

  Contact apple to make an appointment for the genius bar or buy an Apple recommended charger.

  http://www.Apple.com/contact/

• The certificate is not reliable because no sender string has been provided

  There is a thread archived with this question in many responses, however, there is no explanation as to why this error is thrown on some systems and not on others and on FireFox and not on Safari, Chrome, IE, FireFox (on Mac). Not on all Windows systems this error pops up, but it shows that in some systems of windows and all Linux systems I've tried. So, is this a problem on the server or is it a FireFox problem?

  You can get this certificate is not reliable error if the server does not send a required intermediate certificate.

  Firefox automatically records the intermediary certificates that send servers in Manager certificates for future use.
  If a server does not send a complete certificate chain then you get an untrusted error when Firefox has stored missing intermediate certificates to visit a server in the past that a send it, but you get an untrusted error if this intermediate certificate is not yet registered.

  You can check the certificate through a site like this string:

  • http://www.Networking4all.com/en/support/tools/site+check/

• Not reliable-Facebook login

  Hey hope that you guys are doing well,

  So this is my situation, I was working and I decided to take a brake and I wanted to check my facebook but I got a connection of the and there is no way that I could verify, I like firefox, google chrome the hatred and ie and safari is too slow, which can do to solve this problem, I tried to reinstall firefox , but nothing, I disabled my local internet firewall and nothing, I thought it was the firefall, but it was not so, I need your help guys! (I had to use google chrome) :)

  Thank you
  See you soon,.
  Jesus

  Here is a screenshot *http://i.imgur.com/LbjjNZh.png *

  Check the date and time of the clock on your computer: (double) click on the clock icon in the Windows taskbar.

  Find out why the site is not approved, then click on "Technical Details to expand this section.
  If the certificate is not reliable because no issuer channel was provided (sec_error_unknown_issuer) and then see if you can install the intermediate certificate from another source.

  You can retrieve the certificate and check details such as WHO issued the certificates and the expiration dates of certificates.

  • Click on the link at the bottom of the error page: "I understand the risks".

  Let Firefox recover the certificate: "Add Exception"-> "get certificate".

  • Click on the "view..." button. "and inspect the certificate and the Coachman, who is the issuer of the certificate.

  You can see more details like the intermediate certificates that are used in the details pane.

  If "I understand the risks" is missing, then this page can be opened in a (i) frame and in this case, try the shortcut menu and use "Frame this: Open image in New Tab".

  • Note that some firewall monitors connections (sure) and that programs like Sendori or FiddlerRoot can intercept connections and send their own certificate instead of the certificate of the Web site.
  • Note that it is not recommended to add a permanent exception in such a case, so only use it to inspect the certificate.

• "The certificate is not reliable because no issuer channel was provided."

  When you try to access a site, get the message: "the certificate is not reliable because no issuer channel was provided." I was able to access the site with no problems until yesterday.
  There is no option that allows me to continue to the page, so I tried to add an exception manually. However, when I try to do it on my "certificates" tab, I get a message telling me that this Web site already has a valid certificate.
  What is the problem? I am able to access the site on other computers, it is only on my laptop this problem appears...

  Hello, this is a question of a server that does not properly implement intermediate certificates which binds to the CA certificate trusted by the browser root: http://www.sslshopper.com/ssl-checker.html#hostname=andromeda.lf1.cuni.cz

  to avoid that, please just visit this site once, that will put the necessary certificates in the cache of the browser: http://www.terena.org/activities/tcs/repository/

• No matter what I do on firefox, I get a message that the action is not reliable. How can I fix it?

  I started this morning, opens Firefox as usual. The normal task bar has been replaced by a taskbar of Bing. I couldn't get rid of him. So, I tried to reset Firefox. The taskbar of Bing was not deleted. I uninstalled firefox and downloaded the latest version and installed. I also uninstalled the taskbar of Bing as found in my list of programs. I opened Firefox and no matter what I select on the menu or on a website a message appears saying that the site is not reliable. It is as far as I can get in Firefox! The message arrives even for internal actions within Firefox. How can I fix it. It's very frustrating!

  Make a check of malware with several malware scanning of programs on the Windows computer.
  
  Please scan with all programs, because each program detects a different malicious program.
  
  All of these programs have free versions.

  Make sure that you update each program to get the latest version of their databases before scanning.

  • Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware:
    http://www.Malwarebytes.org/MBAM.php
  • AdwCleaner:
    http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/download/adwcleaner/
    http://www.Softpedia.com/get/antivirus/removal-tools/AdwCleaner.shtml
  • SuperAntispyware:
    http://www.SUPERAntiSpyware.com/
  • Microsoft security scanner:
    http://www.Microsoft.com/security/scanner/en-us/default.aspx
  • Windows Defender:
    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/using-Defender
  • Spybot Search & Destroy:
    http://www.safer-networking.org/en/index.html
  • Kasperky free Security Scan:
    http://www.Kaspersky.com/security-scan

  Alternatively, you can write a check for an infection rootkit TDSSKiller.

  • Utility anti-rootkit TDSSKiller:
    http://support.Kaspersky.com/5350?El=88446

  See also:

  • "Spyware on Windows": http://kb.mozillazine.org/Popups_not_blocked

• Since the last update, our site generates this error: the certificate is not reliable because no sender string has been provided.

  We are a company with sales almost exclusively through our site. In the last two weeks, we have had many reports (the certificate is not reliable because no issuer channel was provided) of our customers who use FireFox. I suspect that there has been a recent update. Our site worked fine with FireFox so far.

  We could start maybe not tell our customers how to set their browser settings. We have clients from across the country and the complaints are coming from across the country. Chrome, Opera, Safari and IE do not have this problem.

  You can check the certificate through a site like this string:

  • http://www.Networking4all.com/en/support/tools/site+check/

• Security issue: W540 doesn't sleep is not reliable

  My W540 sleeps not reliable and is surely asleep. Several times, I found my laptop inside a closed bag.

  When the laptop lid is closed, it should be out of time!

  I think that it is a serious problem of safety and reliability.

  Please fix this.

  BrendaEM

  Redesign of the UEFI/Bios to make sure the laptop to sleep and stay asleep help protect human lives.

  .. .and the logevity and processor.

• A .cab file needed for installation is not reliable. Please check the Cryptographic Services are enabled and that the cab file is valid .__Help! __

  OK, so I need DirectX 0.9 c to the game red alert 3, but I can't on the new directx installed on my computer because of this error
  A .cab file needed for installation is not reliable. Please check Cryptographic Services are enabled and the certificate file is valid.

  have you tried solutions on how to solve this problem posted by mods on the previous posts with a similar problem, but it does not work for me

  help is appreciated, thanks

  Game of automatic encryption Services Cryptography on AutoServices and then try again to install the program. To set the cryptographic on AutoServices, follow these steps:

  1. Start the Administrative Tools utility in control Panel.
  2. Double-click Services.
  3. Click Cryptographic Services, and then click Properties.
  4. Click Automatic for Startup type, and then click Start.

  Reference: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/822798/ and follow all practices listed in the article.

  Man is the only animal that laughs and cries; because it is the only animal that is struck by the difference between what things are and what they could be.

• file CAB of DirectX is not reliable

  Hello

  I have a Sony Vaio VPCZ 112 GX.

  System:

  Windows 7 Professional 64 bit
  M 520 @ 2.40 GHz
  4.00 GB RAM

  I was installing the virtual Ferrari Simulator that automatically installs updated to DirectX 9. Update I lost the internet connection and when I restarted the installation of DirectX 9 it says:

  "directx CAB file is not reliable check cryptogenic services."

  When I try to run the game, it says - Xinput1_3.dll not found.

  I tried to uninstall and reinstall the game but nothing.

  Someone please help! Will be well appreciated.

  Thanks in advance.

  Concerning

  Yoann

  Hey,.

  Thanks for the help.

  However, I solved this last night by installing the redistributable components.

  See you soon!

• Garry s Mod 13, install DirectX has failed, "a .cab file is needed for installation is not reliable?

  Hey!

  I did research on this problem literally all over the web, on the forums, support contact Dell and Microsoft hardware too.

  But the question is always free!

  -Very well, so I recently downloaded 13 beta Garry Mod, and I wanted to play. I clicked on 'Play' and he said:

  "Error!"

  You need to update DirectX - google search for "DirectX Runtime" "

  So, I put google and downloaded the link he gave me. I ran the program, and that's what happned:

  "Initializing...". »

  "Installation of components: "

  DirectX Runtime Opitonal Componets.

  Then suddenly out of nowhere, a window pops up saying:

  "A .cab file is needed for installation is not reliable." Please check the cyptographique Services are enabled and the certificate file is valid. »

  After clicking 'OK', it goes back to the origional instalation window saying "Installation failed."

  I'm extremely lost here, I searched for answers, but none of them seem to apply or work.

  I have Windows 7 on an Alienware M14XR2.

  Something will help you, thanks!

  try creating another account

• Synchronization in the cloud is not reliable!

  Why Adobe can't just sync files between my different computers and the cloud just be turned on when I put it ON - so many times I experienced when I arrived at my job after working at home - no synchronization has been made. It is not reliable! Adobe, you should have look at Dropbox - it never happens it!

  I asked (kind of) the same question.

  You say that the synchronization is being turned off somehow?

  I never watch it.   All I see is that the synchronization does not work as expected.  There has been many times that I was walking around my code because my files were not synchronized by Adobe Creative cloud.

  Interesting to note that there's been NO response too.

• MERGER is not reliable?

  Hello gurus,

  Fusion is behaving strangely, and it is not reliable to use
  
  Select * from version of v$.

  Oracle Database 11 g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64 bit Production
  PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
  CORE Production 11.2.0.2.0
  AMT for Linux: Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
  NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
  

  Scenario 1: Expect not to see a record in t1 (1 = 2 condition in a subquery), but got different results

  drop table t1;

  Create table t1 (col1 varchar2 (1) not null);

  
  MERGE INTO t1
  USING (SELECT model
  OF THE DOUBLE
  WHERE 1 = 2) s
  (1 = 2)
  WHEN NOT MATCHED
  THEN
  INSERT (col1)
  VALUES (s.dummy);
  
  = > 1 merged rank
  
  Select * from t1;

  col1
  ----
  X
  
  commit;

  Scenario 2: I expect Oracle but Oracle thrown an exception error (in this case constraint violation not null)

  drop table t2;

  
  Create table t2 (col1 varchar2 (1));

  insert into t2 values ('X');
  insert into t2 values ('Y');
  insert into t2 values ('Z');

  commit;

  With the distinct keyword, it works fine.

  MERGE INTO t1
  USING (SELECT col1 separate
  THE t2
  WHERE 1 = 2) s
  WE (t1.col1 = s.col1)
  WHEN NOT MATCHED
  THEN
  INSERT (col1)
  VALUES (s.col1);
  
  = > 0 rows merged

  with the max() function, he throws ORA-01400: cannot insert NULL into ('USER'. "" T1 ". ("' COL1 ')

  MERGE INTO t1
  USING (SELECT max (col1) as col1
  THE t2
  WHERE 1 = 2) s
  WE (t1.col1 = s.col1)
  WHEN NOT MATCHED
  THEN
  INSERT (col1)
  VALUES (s.col1);

  = > ORA-01400: cannot insert NULL into ('USER'. "" T1 ". ("' COL1 ')

  
  Is - this known bug? If so, slipped in 12 c?

  Please notify

  Thank you
  Pierrette

  First case is certainly a bug. Oracle merge where the conditions of article and the conditions of the clause. So the execution plan is:

  SQL > explain the plan for
  2 MERGER IN Q1
  3 USE (SELECT model
  4 DOUBLE
  5 WHERE 1 = 2) s
  6 (1 = 2)
  7 WHEN NOT MATCHED
  8 THEN
  9. INSERT (col1)
  10 VALUES (s.dummy);

  He explained.

  SQL > select *.
  table 2 (dbms_xplan.display)
  3.

  PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Hash value of plan: 615954128

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  |   0 | MERGE STATEMENT |      |     1.     4.     2 (0) | 00:00:01 |
  |   1.  MERGE | T1 |       |       |            |          |
  |   2.   VIEW |      |       |       |            |          |
  |   3.    TABLE ACCESS FULL | DOUBLE |     1.     2.     2 (0) | 00:00:01 |
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

  PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Note
  -----
  -dynamic sample used for this survey (level = 2)

  14 selected lines.

  SQL >

  And it is set to 11.2.0.3:

  SQL > MERGE IN t1
  HELP (SELECT model 2A
  3 DOUBLE
  4. WHERE 1 = 4) s
  5 (1 = 2)
  6 WHEN NOT MATCHED
  7. CAN
  8 INSERT (col1)
  9 VALUES (s.dummy);

  0 lines merged.

  SQL > explain the plan for
  2 MERGER IN Q1
  3 USE (SELECT model
  4 DOUBLE
  5 WHERE 1 = 4) s
  6 (1 = 2)
  7 WHEN NOT MATCHED
  8 THEN
  9. INSERT (col1)
  10 VALUES (s.dummy);

  He explained.

  SQL > select *.
  table 2 (dbms_xplan.display)
  3.

  PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Hash value of plan: 3917943597

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  |   0 | MERGE STATEMENT |      |     1.     4.     0 (0) |          |
  |   1.  MERGE | T1 |       |       |            |          |
  |   2.   VIEW               |      |       |       |            |          |
  |*  3 |    FILTER |      |       |       |            |          |
  |   4.     TABLE ACCESS FULL | DOUBLE |     1.     2.     2 (0) | 00:00:01 |
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

  PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):
  ---------------------------------------------------

  3 - filter (NULL IS NOT NULL)

  Note
  -----
  -dynamic sample used for this survey (level = 2)

  20 selected lines.

  SQL >

  SY.

• iMessage is still not reliable for 2012

  Read about the lack of reliability of iMessage, it seems to happen from 2012.

  The upgrade to Yosemite to 10.10.5 did nothing to make it more reliable?  My question is

  He is sending my computer, but I'm told that a message was sent a text message for me.

  but I do not receive my MacBook Air iMessage request.  Is this something to do

  with her, sent from an iPhone to a MacBook Air (mid-2013)?

  If the message is a text message that have sent you, Messages he will receive unless you have an updated iPhone in place to relay the text message on your computer.

  Transfer system preferences.

  Continuity requirements transfer procedure

  Transfer continuity troubleshooting procedure

  Continuity of transfer troubleshooting (2)

  iPhone, iPad, iPod touch and Mac using continuity - connect

  SMS relay - set and use - Yosemite / iOS 8

  SMS relay - set and use - Yosemite / iOS 8 (2)

  Sending text messages

• I why Google is not reliable? its a Web site everyone uses!

  his saying this.

  This connection is Untrusted

  You asked Firefox to connect on www.google.co.uk, but we cannot confirm that your connection is secure.

  Normally, when you try to connect safely, sites will present a reliable identification to prove that you're in the right place. However, the identity of this site cannot be verified.
  What should I do?

  If you normally connect to this site without problems, this error can mean that someone is trying to impersonate the identity of the site, and you should not continue.

  This site uses HTTP Strict Transport Security (HST) to specify that Firefox didn't connect safely. As a result, it is not possible to add an exception for this certificate.

  www.Google.co.UK uses an invalid security certificate.

  The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is unknown.
  The server may not send the appropriate intermediate certificates.
  A certificate of origin additional should be imported.

  (Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer)

  That is the only site that gives you an untrusted connection or it is rampant with many sites? Before creating exceptions, we recommend that you investigate the cause of the problem. In some cases, just Firefox is not set up to work with your security software or parental filter mentioned previously. In other cases, however, a malware infection can be reading all your navigation and you do not want to clean that up.

  As a starting point, use one of these: BitDefender, ESET, Kaspersky or Avast?