NAC L2 OOB VG issue with wired user

Similar Questions

• NAC L2 OOB VG Design for wired

  Hi all

  I need help of the NAC 2 OOB virtual layer for wired users design bridge . On Cisco documentation configuration only example is present, but it is for wireless users who is not applicable to my case (wired users); Here are the details; Please correct me if the design does not at any time;

  1: create a virtual local network (241) for the management of the CAM on the kernel.

  2: create a virtual local area network (240) for the management of CASES on the kernel.

  3: the IP addresses of both (10.10.240.1) E0 and E1 (10.10.240.1) for the CASE will be on the same subnet and same ip address.

  4: create all Trusted SVI's VLAN (vlan 10,20) on the kernel.

  5: configure manage subnets for vlan not reliable (100, 200) on CASES

  6: create a vlan mapping n/b approved and not approved (10 to 100, from 20 to 200)

  7: core connected to the CAs: E0, trunk allowed vlan 10, 20, 240

  8: core connected to the CAs: E1, trunk allowed vlan 100, 200

  9: another typical configuration

  I don't have a LABORATORY to test. I'm just confused if I missed something as implementation will be critical, and I'll try to avoid all risks.

  Please give me suggestion and best practices. Also please let me know if I need a config added?

  Kind regards

  Abdul Majid Khan

  Abdul,

  Port profiles are used to determine if a port is managed or not managed, so you will need at least a port profile. Here you can define what will be the VLAN initial of the switchports that the final VLAN will be etc etc.

  More details here: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/nac/appliance/configuration_guide/48/cam/m_oob.html#wp1083087

  HTH

  Faisal

• Install issues with C:\Users as a symbolic link to D:\Users

  I discovered this problem earlier this year, but has been recently bitten by it again, so I thought I should report it.

  I have 2013 LabView student which was delivered with a Sparkfun Arduino edition. My computer has an SSD as C: and a magnetic HDD as D:. I am familiar with Linux (Debian) and like the idea of users being entirely on a separate OS drive install to do the backup not only data, but also my easiest settings. I have my entire users folder on D: and a symbolic link (mklink j) on C:. Nothing that I have installed or used seems to have a problem with this configuration, until I first tried to install LabView 2013. The installer actually converted the symbolic link to a directory which as you can imagine all sorts of things in Windows. I have to go in recovery to resetablish the symbolic link mode.

  I got there, but recently installed Packager NI 2014 so I got to spend the last LINX and came across the same bug. (Installation of the latest LINX has not triggered the bug, just installing MPON.) Finally, I reaiized what has been wroing after panic that someone sniffed my network traffic and hacked my Microsoft account because I had just used a public WiFi at a local library without sending my traffic via an encrypted VPN tunnel...

  I don't know how to get more details about this bug, and I'm really not want to try to reproduce due to the dispute must recover. I hope someone in the NC can it track down and crush.

  SymbolicLinks under Windows using for Installation of the program paths is strongly discouraged by Microsoft itself as it break various things, not only confusing installers. They that prohibit specifically for several places because of that. Symbolic links, theoretically possible since NTFS v3 only appeared in Windows Vista and are even in Windows 7, a feature and not hidden. Hidden enough that it is not used often and he still has many quirks.

  Windows Installer Component and component Wiindows Services still are struggling to work correctly with symbolic links, which makes it difficult for software developers to create standard installers who can actually work correctly when targeting paths that contain symbolic links.

  Your Linux background very probably plays tricks on you. While symbolic (and difficult) links are an inherent feature of almost every Unix file system driver since its inception at the beginning, it is still a feature rarely exercised under Windows, except for some internal virtualization of Windows files to the locations of user files.

  A lu interestying is this wiki article whiich details some of the possible problems with symbolic links even under the most recent versions of Windows. For example, it is interesting to note that redirect the program basically files will be an upgrade of Windows fail catastrophally.

• 802. 1 x EAP - TLS for wired users with ACS 5.5

  Hi all

  We are setting up a new configuration for wired users authentication with 802.1 x (EAP - TLS). ACS 5.5 we use as an authentication server.

  We have added the certificate (internal) CA root and certifcate for ACS signed by CA. Now, we want to check that authentication works or not. I hope that the CA root and identity certifcate also we need to install in laptop computers. But I don't know how to download the certifcates for client machine manually to CA.

  Please suggest on how to get certificates for clients both manually and automatically?

  Thank you

  Vijay

  Hi Vijay,

  for Wired 802.1 x (EAP - TLS) you must have the following certificates:

  Intermediate server on ACS - Root CA, CA certificate,

  The customer - Root CA, intermediate CA, user certificate (in the case of user authentication) or Machine certificae (in the case of authentication of the computer)

  I do not know what third-party certificate you use, if its Microsoft in the House or any other certificate server, you need to download the client certificate to the server itself.

  In the case of Microsoft, there will be a user certificate template. You can select and create user certificate

  This is an old document, but a computer certificate for the user configuration steps, you can see the steps to download the certificate user if his server from Microsoft:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/secure-access-control...

  In case you use the third serevr certificate, then you must check with them on how to download the certificate of the user

  See you soon

  Mohammed (rate useful message)

• Flex sign in with a user ACL with APs switch locally

  Hi all
  Flex connects allow a user ACL to download the session with local authentication, dial-up, Central? We use ISE for the central policy engine and have the DACL of a wiring installation but am about to embark on WLAN. The controller is a 5508 and the. APs are 3700.

  Second question-if the feeder connect APs do not any form by the user ACL, the other option is to have units in normal mode where they are both centrally switched and authenticated at the center that I understand to support one user ACL. Our WAN links are between 10 Mbps - 30mbps and latency most would be about 40ms. Did this cause issues with network links EXPANDED size and latency?
  Thank you

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPad App

  Well you run v7.6 so FlexConnect user RADIUS ACLs are supported by this doc since v7.5.

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless/5500-Series-Wireless-...

  The extent of latency WAN 200ms is good, but it depends on your use of the WAN now and AP how you plan on installing and the increase in wireless on your WAN traffic. There is a minimum requirement, but you're on at the end to make sure that you have sufficient bandwidth, otherwise you will need to QoS traffic capwap for ensure that APs do not bounce connected to stand alone.

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App

• compatibility issue with the software for Windows XP

  When I try to install a program, it says that I need to be runniing in windows XP. I try to install the program in compatibility mode and get the same message, and the program does not load. When I called the technical support for the program they tell me I need to download a donwload of compatibility for microsoft. I find no download for this issue. Thank you for your help.

  You could ask Zoll Medical to be more specific about any download (get a link) that they could help you.

  You are in contact with other users of this equipment you can ask them if they have similar problems and have any alliterative solution.

  Have you tried right clicking on the shortcut to the Setup.exe and choose the option "Run As Administrator"?

• How many user take RDP at the same time with different user login ID in Server R2 2012

  How many user take RDP at the same time with different user login ID in Server R2 2012?

  How many user take RDP at the same time with different user login ID in Server 2008 R2?

  How many user take RDP at the same time with different user login ID in Server 2012 starndard?

  How many user take RDP at the same time with different user login ID in Server 2008 standard?

  This issue is beyond the scope of this site (for consumers) and to make sure you get the best answer, we need to ask either on Technet (for IT Pro) or MSDN (for developers)
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home s/fr-U.S./Accueil
  http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/Forum
  
  
  If you give us a link to the new thread we can point to some resources it

• I am running Windows Server 2003 R2 and am having a problem with a user profile.

  I'm running windows server 2003 r2 and am having a problem with a user profile, we have a logon.bat file that runs to map drives, but also call a logon.html file, that user gets the logon.html appear, but IE blocked then this happens only for a single user, others are ok. Any ideas please?

  original title: profile of Win 7 issue

  Hello

  Your Windows 2003 R2 server question is more complex than what is generally answered in the Microsoft Answers forums. It is better suited for the IT Pro TechNet public. Please post your question in the Microsoft Technet Forum. You can follow the link to your question:

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en/category/WindowsServer/

  Hope the information is useful.

• When I log in with the user account that reflects on the one hand by car, there is no batch file or a script in AD for this user profile

  Hello

  I created a new user in AD (Server 2003).

  When I connect with the user account that reflects on the one hand by car, it not there no batch file or a script in advertising for this user profile. I don't want user to access this part by car.

  If anyone can help.

  Kind regards

  Virendra Tainya

  Hello Virenda,

  Thanks for posting your query on the Microsoft Community.

  I would like to inform you that we have a support forum dedicated to systems on area issues, I suggest you to send your query on Microsoft TechNet forum for this issue. You can get more effective suggestions and adapted by experts familiar with this topic.

  Please visit the link below to find a community that will support what ask you:

   

  Microsoft TechNet

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/WindowsServer/en-us/home?Forum=winservergen

  Hope the helps of information. Let us know if you need help with Windows related issues. We will be happy to help you.

  Thank you

• Should have issue with PE8 airbags!

  PE7 was (at least for me) usable and stable.  He did what I wanted, and I don't remember the problems of stability.  That all ending with an 'upgrade' to PE8.  I can't seem to make it work for 2-5 minutes before it crashes.  It happens at different times and in various activities... just look at the screen.

  I have a good video card NVIDIA (which very well seems to work with all the other products that I have), but I read the 'solution' pinned at the top of this forum, updated to version "beta" of the driver who is supposed to fix the random crash... However, my 195,81 verified drivers have had zero impact on the uniform PE8 crashing.  I was not able to complete a single project, as I've "improved" version 7.  My system is vista 32 bit with 4 GB of physical ram and a stocky core2quad processor.  It runs CAD, flight sims and other audio applications and video two well and probably... but not PE8.  The only other app with what he has had problems is PSE8... but the minor issues with PSE8 pale in comparison with the total absence of ergonomics in PE8.

  I see so many similar reviews and comments from the forum... I wish, oh how I wish I had waited for a decision on the upgrade!

  So the question is: given this release has been horrible, there will be a free and fixed version 8?  .. .or will be Adobe attempt to make his customers wait (and pay) version 9?  I can say that if they think that this is the case, Adobe loses me as a client PSE & PE... and all hope it will be for the review of their substitutes like Lightroom, Photoshop or Premiere (non-elements).  They can be produced purposes... but if the prospect of the company is such with the entry-level products, it won't take long for a company to feel too big for her panties with the highest range as well.

  Has no QA whatever happen with PSE8 or PE8?

  I can also use ffdshow, but I turned off this one due to the poor performance in the Organizer.

  I don't know how if button PrE, but FFDShow asked all sorts of headaches to the PrPro. A few users have been able to do anything when it was installed. To return to the PrPro 1.0 release (first 7), Adobe changed the engine to display live Show. I don't know at what time in pre development even could happen - don't know my history of pre, as I know PrPro.

  For users of PrPro, the complete withdrawal of FFDShow got things back to normal. It seems a little difficult to get rid of, however.

  As to why your PrE earlier will work fine with the same images, but PrE 8 is having issues, I can't help, as I don't know what's under the hood with 8 PrE. Perhaps a new feature that Smurf things with the MS MJPEG CODEC, or maybe the conflict is elsewhere.

  I think that the Mogran, at least, has a trial, but he had the MainConcept MJPEG for so long, I forget now.

  I would look at disabling FFDShow, as a test. Make a System Restore Point before the withdrawal, in the case that has zero to do with anything whatsoever, and you want to roll back to have. Then remove and test. I would also like to do a System Restore Point it too, just in case.

  Good luck

  Hunt

• Form with active user rights only works on some machines.

  I created a pdf file that contains video media. For this I have attached an acrobat form created with extended user rights. When send a certain number of respondents, some are able to open and fill out the form, and then return the form (in pdf format) while others experience a message "this operation is not allowed.

  The pdf of media is created in Acrobat 9 pro on the Windows XP platform and the form in Acrobat as well. The form has three drop-down menus and the three fields to fill.

  If the form is sent on its own, everyone is able to access.  It is only when the form is sent as an attachment to the pdf of video media that this is a known issue. The pdf file must be retro-compatible with Acro7.

  My problem is that I do not understand why it works with some and not others. (These are not coprorates but people.)

  You will appreciate the help. Date deadline has passed.

  For use with Acrobat you don't need extended Forms user rights.

• Single Sign on authentication failed with error [user: username is found, but]

  Hello
  
  URGENT:
  
  One user is trying to connect to Essbase by Excle worksheet. To connect in Essbase, this user who connects to the network using the VPN connection. I suspect that this question arises because of an invalid password, but the user claiming that password is correct. When I checked the user information in Essabase, he gave an external authentication that is valid.
  
  Please help me on this issue. What should go wrong with this user?
  
  * Single Sign on authentication failed with error [user: username found, but could not authenticate] *.
  
  Thanks again for your help.
  
  Kind regards
  UB.

  If essbase uses an external authentication as MSAD, you can get the password changed at the level of the AD by someone who takes care of the administration.

  See you soon

  John
  http://John-Goodwin.blogspot.com/

• ios10 problem with non-users of iphone messaging

  After upgrading my iPhone 6 ios10, I had intermittent problems with the messaging of Android users (basically, the conversations no iMessage). In about 60% of the time it is not just to deliver the message no matter what I do (pressing the 'Try Again' don't work do not). He has no problem with the reception of the texts, but I can't answer to Android users (Interestingly, I can message users of Android if they are in a group with iPhone users text). I tried everything was updated to the last verision until reset of ios everything.

  I can't find anything online about this. I'm the only one who what?

  Group Messaging uses the MMS. Normal text messages using SMS. SMS uses the voice channel to transfer messages and is strictly a basic function. If you are experiencing problems sending SMS, contact your carrier.

• Huawei P9 - I have many issues with getting my pictures from the phone to my Imac

  Huawei P9 - I have many issues with getting my pictures from the phone to iphoto on my Mac.

  Before the summer I bought a Huawei P9 phone, I can easily see the photos on the phone - I can't just them on my mac.  When I connect via a USB cable, it refuses my permissions.

  I try to use my Google account to view on the Mac and move the iPhoto - I can't work either! I can see them, I can't move them!

  I'm pulling my hair out and I have enough to do with! Help, please...

  Jim Hosking

  You need the phone provider support - there is a problem with the way their phone works and how to use it and has nothing to do with the Photos or iPhoto - if pictures is consistent with standards of good Photos and iPhoto won't work with it

  You may need special third party software for your phone load in Photos or iPhoto

  LN

• El Capitan permissions bad for lib with multiple users

  On my Mac with multiple users and running El Capitan, I encountered a problem with an application (GoGlobal) failed to start with "errno = 13", which is a problem of permissions with usr/local/lib /.

  I determined that on Yosemite, usr/local/lib was owned by root and permissions: drwxr-xr-x. However, on El Capitan, usr/local/usr / local / lib lib is owned by one of the nicks (random?) and has permissions drwx-, which is the source of the errno = 13.

  I got around the problem by chmod 755 to lib /, but I fear that a future update will reset these permissions impassable previous values. Please correct these settings in install and update routines.

  GoGlobal isn't a request to Apple. You can send your message to the developer, who develops not only the Application itself, but the installation script that puts in place of its components.