NAC SSO vpn: is the CASE real-IP mode supported?

Similar Questions

• IDSM2 on the inline 6500 IOS mode support?

  Hello

  I have a JOINT-2 running IPS5.1 (1 d) (recently updated to 4.x) software that sits on a 6500 IOS.

  The IPS Device Manager shows gi0/7 and gi0/8 as well in Promiscuous mode. There is no option to change the inline mode and pair them up.

  Is it so that JOINT-2 currently supports only Promiscuous mode?

  If so, this module is always as IDS despite the execution of IPS5.1. Is it not? What is the advantage that I get after upgrade from 4.x to 5.1?

  -Vasanth

  There are 2 pieces of the puzzle.

  There is the JOINT-2 version and it takes in charge, but also the native IOS of Cat 6 K version and that it supports.

  Supports the v5.1 (1 d) JOINT-2

  (a) promiscuous mode.

  (b) mode InLine Interface pair (2 interfaces are matched to online tracking) and also

  (c) pair online mode of Vlan (2 VLANS on a single interface is matched for online tracking, you will also see it called inline-on-a-stick)

  But for these features to be used, the code switch must also support the configuration on the side of the switch of the JOINT-2 for each of these 3 features.

  Native versions of IOS prior to 12.2 (18) SXE will only support the Promiscuous on JOINT-2 mode.

  12.2 (18) SXE and later versions support Interface InLine mode on JOINT-2 pair.

  No native IOS version does currently support InLine Vlan pair on JOINT-2 mode (a new versions native IOS with this support is currently in development).

  For inlining (IPS), you need to run a Native IOS version 12.2 (18) SXE and later and on the JOINT-2 run IPS versions 5.1 (or even older 5.0).

  (NOTE: Cat OS 8.5 (1) takes in charge the 3 modes of JOINT-2.) Therefore, if you use cat instead of the native IOS OS, then run version 8.5 (1) to have access to all the features of IPS 5.1 (1) on the JOINT-2)

  If you run a Native IOS version prior to 12.2 (18) SXE and the JOINT-2 then it can run in "Promiscuous" mode even if 5.1 (1) is responsible for the JOINT-2.

  However, even in "Promiscuous" mode the IPS 5.1 (1) software has a few advantages.

  There are several engines and engine parameters are only supported in version 5.1 and not the version 4.0. (So there are several signatures that are either one) not yet created for sensors 4.x, or b) signature 4.x is not as precise as the signature of 5.x in new engines.

  (These new engines are proved invaluable in writing signatures to detect some of the new attacks that came out last year).

  There are of course other benefits:

  For example:

  (1) risk of note to best aid priority to alerts.

  (2) fitlering more flexible mechanism for alerts that allows individual actions of fitlering

  The 2 features above are only 2 of the new features that have been added in 5.0 and 5.1 that apply both of promiscuity and online modes.

• NAC does not insert the CASE.

  Hello

  I have a problem when going to insert a Nac server in our manager of the NAC, the message that appears is "failed to add the server: Maximum limit for access servers own supported has been reached", but I Don t no matter what server do not have in this handler of the NAC. "»

  Someone has an idea?

  Kind regards

  Wagner Silveira

  Display resolution for registration: customer had bad licenses as they have been issued to the MAC address of the CASs. Licenses are always supposed to be issued to the MAC address of the CAM.

• Is the difference between TSMC and Samsung Chip in the real Iphone 6 s? If this is the case, how can I found it before buying a new? How can I

  Is the difference between TSMC and samsung chip processors in the real Iphone 6 s? If this is the case, how can I found it before buying a new one?

  No, it isn't.

• NAC 4.8 adding to the case because of the cam

  Hi all

  I threw a half because of the NAC installation and this is my first deployment of the NAC, I feel a little overwhelmed.

  I read the installation guide for the devices from the back to the front, but I have a problem after the addition of a case to the cam.

  I am able to add the case to the cam successfully, but almost immediately, the case and the cam can no longer ping between them in the cli.

  the States of event logs that the heap in connected to the cam, but newspapers then an error that the cam is unable to push the registration to the CAs. from this point, I get several questions of event log indicating that the case is out of sync

  I copied a part of the nac_manager.log which show the connection process:

  2012-03-09 22:33:06.037 + 1100 [TP-Processor24] INFO com.perfigo.wlan.web.admin.SecureSmartServer - SSS - connect: get the new connectorClient of 10.0.0.100

  2012-03-09 22:33:36.433 + 1100 [TP-Processor24] INFO com.perfigo.wlan.web.admin.SecureSmartManager - SSM - addSecureSmartServer: sleep for 2 seconds to click to restart

  2012-03-09 22:33:38.434 + 1100 [TP-Processor24] INFO com.perfigo.wlan.web.admin.SecureSmartManager - SSM - addSecureSmartServer: sleep for 2 seconds to click to restart

  2012-03-09 22:33:40.436 + 1100 [TP-Processor24] INFO com.perfigo.wlan.web.admin.SecureSmartManager - SSM - addSecureSmartServer: sleep for 2 seconds to click to restart

  2012-03-09 22:33:42.438 + 1100 [TP-Processor24] INFO com.perfigo.wlan.web.admin.SecureSmartManager - SSM - addSecureSmartServer: click on the STOPPED state

  2012-03-09 22:33:42.617 + 1100 WARN [TP-Processor24] com.perfigo.wlan.web.admin.SecureSmartPublisher - NAC Server 10.0.0.100 is out-of-sync.

  2012-03-09 22:33:42.702 + 1100 [TP-Processor24] ERROR com.perfigo.wlan.web.admin.FilePublisher - FilePublisher - writing: setPath failed...

  2012-03-09 22:33:42.793 + 1100 [TP-Processor24] ERROR com.perfigo.wlan.web.admin.FilePublisher - FilePublisher - writing: setPath failed...

  2012-03-09 22:33:42.833 + 1100 [TP-Processor24] ERROR com.perfigo.wlan.web.admin.SecureSmartPublisher - SSM publishAccess: impossible to publish the comments sign-up page

  2012-03-09 22:33:42.872 + 1100 [TP-Processor24] com.perfigo.wlan.jmx.admin.FileUtil - FileUtil - readFile INFO: /perfigo/control/conf/os-detection.fp

  2012-03-09 22:33:42.887 + 1100 [TP-Processor24] ERROR com.perfigo.wlan.web.admin.AccessConf - cannot activate ETH1 on 10.0.0.100

  2012-03-09 22:33:42.888 + 1100 [TP-Processor24] ERROR c.perfigo.wlan.web.admin.AdminIpAccessInfoManager - AIAIM - publishAccess: failure

  2012-03-09 22:33:42.888 + 1100 [TP-Processor24] INFO com.perfigo.wlan.web.admin.ServerConf - SC - stopOobSWissServer()

  2012-03-09 22:33:42.905 + 1100 [TP-Processor24] INFO com.perfigo.wlan.web.admin.SecureSmartManager - 10.0.0.100 added to Clean Access Manager

  2012-03-09 22:33:46.922 + 1100 [pool-1-thread-1] ERROR com.perfigo.wlan.web.admin.ConnectorClient - Exception of Communication: can't connect with the exception of server access own creation connection to: 10.0.0.100. nested exception is:

  java.net.SocketTimeoutException: connect timed out

  2012-03-09 22:33:46.922 + com.perfigo.wlan.web.admin.SecureSmartPublisher - SSP - connectAndPublish 1100 [pool-1-thread-1] ERROR: could not connect to 10.0.0.100

  2012-03-09 22:34:01.614 + 1100 [pool-1-wire-2] ERROR com.perfigo.wlan.web.admin.ConnectorClient - Exception of Communication: can't connect with the exception of server access own creation connection to: 10.0.0.100. nested exception is:

  java.net.SocketTimeoutException: connect timed out

  2012-03-09 22:34:01.615 + com.perfigo.wlan.web.admin.SecureSmartPublisher - SSP - connectAndPublish 1100 [pool-1-wire-2] ERROR: could not connect to 10.0.0.100

  2012 03-09 22:34:01.627 + 1100 [pool-1-wire-2] WARN com.perfigo.wlan.web.admin.SecureSmartPublisher - NAC Server 10.0.0.100 is out-of-sync.

  2012-03-09 22:34:05.628 + 1100 [TP-Processor19] com.perfigo.wlan.web.admin.ConnectorClient - Exception of Communication ERROR: could not connect with the exception of server access own creation connection to: 10.0.0.100. nested exception is:

  java.net.SocketTimeoutException: connect timed out

  2012-03-09 22:34:20.618 + 1100 [pool-1-wire-3] ERROR com.perfigo.wlan.web.admin.ConnectorClient - Exception of Communication: can't connect with the exception of server access own creation connection to: 10.0.0.100. nested exception is:

  java.net.SocketTimeoutException: connect timed out

  I've followed all of the installation guides recommendation of the disconnection of the interface untrust on the CASE and there is no HA configuration currently...

  What I don't understand is the inability of webcams and cases of ping each other, but they can ping other devices on the network. The SCA and the cam are in different VLANS.

  Any assistant to a guru of the NAC would be greatly appreciated.

  Thank you

  JS

  Thanks a lot Man, saved you my day

• optimize the case for a same computation structures

  Hi all. I want to compare an array of numbers with 0 in the first place, if they are greater than zero, we do a simple calculation such as 10 + 10; If they are less than 0, we make another simple calculation like 10-5; of course, it can be achieved by the VI I wrote it in the attachment, but I wonder if we have the best ways to solve it, maybe a single structure case because we have exactly the same calculation for the same situation. Thank you for your helpful suggestions. I updated a picture just in case if you do not want to download the VI.

  You can search the table of Boolean 1 d to the value True.  Then, the value will be-1 (no true), 0, 1, 2, or 3 for the index.  HAV that animate a single structure case. When the respective indicator is in each case.

  Of course if all calculations are exactly the same (assuming 10-5 is just simplified), you can put the calculation outside the structure of the case and feed it to the respective case.

  EDIT: You don't need to build an array of zeros to compare to another array.  You can simply use a zero scalar.  And you don't need that.  Just use the primitive > 0.

  In fact, I don't really know what you're trying to do here.  Why do you have different indicators in cases of false and real cases?

• structure of the event within the structure of the case? error or limitation of LabVIEW?

  Hello

  I am trying to reach a structure of the event within a box structure. The event is triggered by a mouse event (mouse down, move to the top).

  This vi tries to simulate behaviour of the device with a sensor, so the mouse triggered the structure of the event, won't be there in real working environment, so I can't remove the structure of the case.

  But as I noticed that if I try to click on the drawing (that my mouse events are triggered with) before activating the Boolean condition of 2D, I can access is no longer the component front (button, leads, etc.).

  They seems to be frozen. But if the case is true before you try click on the 2D drawing area, everything seems to work well.

  Is - this protected by a kind of LabVIEW bug or there is a limitation?

  These are my screws.

  Thank you

  

  Hello Nefertari,

  Use a Standard Architecture.

  I changed the code. I hope now that its fine.

  Please find the code updated the joint.

  LV 2012.

  Kind regards

  Leila

• I want to display strings that are in the structure of the case, in a text area

  Hello

  I write a vi, which has the structure of the event inside that one

  structure of the case.

  I have a problem, I have two cases.

  (1) when the value is true it executes the real deal, first it reads the string constant and second string indicator which is my out is put.

  (2) in the case of false it is pritty much even.

  I want to display the entries and exit puts different situations in the same text box is one for input and one for output.

  Someone can help me.

  
  

• Do nothing in the case structure with loop For

  Hello

  I am trying to extract data from my signal (0.3 0.4 0.6...). I want to extract values greater than 0.5 and put it in a table. If I use a loop For which I can determine each index of my data to be compared and it happened in the structure of the case. In the 'Real' box, I wanted the value to extract outside the loop For. And I want to "do nothing" if my value falls within the box 'False. ' However, it displays error, saying "' Tunnel: lack of assignment to the tunnel '."

  I tried to select 'Default', but it does not work since I use a Boolean comparison. I tried to use the registry to shift, but in vain too.

  Someone could guide me on this to extract only a value greater than 0.5 and index them?

  For example "0.6 0.7 0.8; 3 4 7 index.

  Satisfaction will be given.

  

  

  Here you have

• RandomGen elements, case structure nothing if it's false, while the loop passes iterations, can not get the values in table outside the structure of the case

  Hello!

  I tried to build a trigger that triggers a true value each 1000 milliseconds (from the first real);

  which real command structure box to a value of the randomNrGen of the sample and place it in a table.

  but I would like to USE this table and I can't do this beacause I can not get out of the structure of the case.

  AND:

  the while loop ignores samples; If you run the vi and look at the speed at which the table fills, ypu notice it is not periodic: the first few items are inserted at 1 second interval, but then it jumps one;

  would it be because of the wait time 1ms?

  1. How can I create a structure that does this:

  If set to True, it samples a value from Genesis at random and places it in the table

  OTHERWISE, it does NOTHING, without zeros sent to the table just waiting for the next true and only the values sampled at True remain in the table?

  2. How can I stop it pop samples (multiples of 1000 in my case)?

  In conclusion: I need to be able to take samples on the sample generator and store them in an array of 3d in a zig - zag (1.jpg) way, but able to think about it, we need to go beyond these two questions.

  Please ignore the meter.

  Please help me!

  TibiG wrote:

  Thanks, Crossrulz!

  This did not omit all values and it works fine.

  Is it possible to get information in a case without making use of the large loop?

  My program will become very complex (I need to synchronize a magnetometer and a stepper motor to make a 3d map of the magnetic field of the magnet) and I want to do everything as simple as possible.

  If there is a way to get information about a case structure, other tnan using registers with shift on the big loop, and you know it, please show me.

  Thank you!

  You could also use a Feedback node, just keep it out of the structure of the case.

• Changing Variables in the Structure of the case?

  Hi all

  I have a box structure. Depending on whether the case is t/f I would change the value of two variables. If I put two variables in the real part of the strcture case that they may not be in the wrong part. How would assign values outside the structure of matter? Could I refer to the time of their numeorus in different cases? Thank you.

  So, something like that?

  

• Mounted the case for POWERSHOT SX50HS

  Hello

  -What someone has a suggestion for a case for my camera.  Amazon has an Everready case it seems to be described as a product of inner quality. Canon has one on the site of tneir as well.

  Thank you guys!

  Hi, ICUTWO!

  For better quality and performance, we recommend going with a real gun carrying case for your camera.  The case of Soft Deluxe PSC-4100 is tailor-made for the Canon PowerShot SX30 IS, SX40 HS and your camera, the SX50 HS, who share all the very similar form factors.  You can learn more on this subject and order, if you wish, on the link below.

  We hope this helps!

  http://bit.LY/1d3LTBZ

• Disassemble the case HPE-250F

  To remove the pci-e wireless card, but the antenna extends under the top of the case.  Impossible to find an exit for the top panel and do not want to cut wire antennas, can anyone help?  Not covered in the info service/update available

  It's great!  You can get everything here http://h20574.www2.hp.com/results.htm?SID=4160010&MEID=E9351D0A-0619-4B9A-84F6-E85576EA8D35

  wonder why it is impossible to find with the search engines or the navigation through the website of hp?

  Download video with Real Player is a snap.

• Cisco ASA5520 facing ISP with private IP address. How to get the IPSec VPN through the internet?

  / * Style definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name : « Table Normal » ; mso-tstyle-rowband-taille : 0 ; mso-tstyle-colband-taille : 0 ; mso-style-noshow:yes ; mso-style-priorité : 99 ; mso-style-qformat:yes ; mso-style-parent : » « ;" mso-rembourrage-alt : 0 à 5.4pt 0 à 5.4pt ; mso-para-marge-top : 0 ; mso-para-marge-droit : 0 ; mso-para-marge-bas : 10.0pt ; mso-para-marge-left : 0 ; ligne-hauteur : 115 % ; mso-pagination : widow-orphelin ; police-taille : 11.0pt ; famille de police : « Calibri », « sans-serif » ; mso-ascii-font-family : Calibri ; mso-ascii-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-fareast-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-fareast-theme-font : minor-fareast ; mso-hansi-font-family : Calibri ; mso-hansi-theme-font : minor-latin ;}

  Hello guys,.

  I have Cisco ASA5520 facing the ISP with private IP address. We don't have a router and how to get the IPSec VPN through the internet?

  The question statement not the interface pointing to ISP isn't IP address private and inside as well.

  Firewall configuration:

  Firewall outside interface Gi0 10.0.1.2 > ISP 10.0.1.1 with security-level 0

  Firewall inside the interface Ethernet0 192.168.1.1 > LAN switch 192.168.1.2 with security-level 100

  I have public IP block 199.9.9.1/28

  How can I use the public IP address to create the IPSec VPN tunnel between two sites across the internet?

  can I assign a public IP address on the Gig1 inside the interface with the security level of 100 and how to apply inside to carry on this interface?

  If I configure > firewall inside of the item in gi1 interface ip address 199.9.9.1/28 with security-level 100. How to make a safe lane VPN through this interface on the internet?

  I'm used to the public IP address allocation to the interface outside of the firewall and private inside the interface IP address.

  Please help with configuration examples and advise.

  Thank you

  Eric

  Unfortunately, you can only complete the VPN connection on the interface the VPN connection source, in your case the external interface.

  3 options:

  (1) connect a router in front of the ASA and assign your public ip address to the ASA outside interface.

  OR /.

  (2) If your ISP can perform static translation of 1 to 1, then you can always finish the VPN on the external interface and ask your provider what is the static ip address assigned to your ASA out of the IP (10.0.1.2) - this will launch the VPN of bidirectionally

  OR /.

  (3) If your ISP performs PAT (dynamic NAT), then you can only start the tunnel VPN on the side of the ASA and the other end of the tunnel must be configured to allow VPN LAN-to-LAN dynamics.

• You try to run a Site to site VPN and remote VPN from the same IP remotely

  We currently have a site to site VPN configuration between our offices call center and a 3rd party that allows them to access our training to their employees to use environment while being trained on our systems. This tunnel is running between our ASA and their ASA without problem; However, when we have managers come out to the call center, they are unable to use remote VPN to access our office.

  Apparently the same IP peer remote that we use for our site to the other tunnel is the same IP that our managers use to access the internet when they are on-site with the customer. When I look at the logs it shows the VPN attempt and then I get treatment Information Exchange has failed. So from what I can understand when our managers are trying to connect to our firewall from the same IP address as the counterpart of site to site it automatically tries to create a tunnel, according to the information of the site to the other tunnel. If our managers are anywhere else, they can connect through remote VPN with no problems.

  My question is if anyone knows of a way to make the firewall allow VPN site to site and remote connections with the same remote IP address.

  Hi John,.

  Basically, in older versions, when you hit a static encryption card and you does not match this static encryption completely map the connection continues until the dynamic encryption card. For this reason, you can connect your IPSec clients before. A bug has been opened on this vulnerability.

  CSCuc75090  Details of bug

  The crypto IPSec Security Association are created by dynamic crypto map to static peers

  Symptom:

  When a static VPN peer adds all traffic to the ACL crypto, a surveillance society is based even if the pair IP is not allowed in the acl to the main façade encryption. Are these SA finally put in correspondence and commissioning the dynamic crypto map instance.

  Conditions:

  It was a planned design since the first day that allowed customers to fall through in the case of static crypto map did not provide a necessary cryptographic services.

  The SA must be made from a peer configured statically and a dynamic crypto map instance must be configured on the receiving end.

  Workaround solution:

  N/A

  Some possible workarounds are:

  Configure a static nat device when you try to use the remote VPN if the firewall remotely will be hit with a different public IP address. It would be a good solution, but it will depend on how many ip addresses public you have available, if you really want one of these ip addresses for that access.

  Also, I thought you could use AnyConnect instead of the IPSec VPN client. I don't know how many users need to connect from your PC to the remote site, but the ASA has 2 licenses SSL available that you could use. Because Anyconnect uses the SSL protocol, it won't have a problem on your environment.

  Below some information:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/ASA/asa84/configuration/guide/asa_84_cli_config/vpn_anyconnect.html

  Hope this helps,

  Luis.