Need help with query SQL Inline views + Group

Similar Questions

• Need help with a SQL query

  Hello

  I have a data in table (raj_table) with columns (char11) raj_id, raj_number (varchar2 (15)), raj_format (NUMBER), Primary_ID (identity with the values of the primary key column)

  Primary_ID raj_id Raj_number Raj_format

  1                            raj                 rajvend                      1

  2                            raj                 rajvend                      1

  3                            raj                 rajvendor1                 2

  4                            raj                 rajvendor1                 2

  5                            raj                 rajvendor1                 2

  6                            raj                 rajvendor2                 3

  I used under SQL to get query output as below, but has not achieved the required result:

  Select client_id vendor_number, vendor_format, primary_id, row_number() on sl_no (client_id partition, primary_id, vendor_format order of client_id primary_id, vendor_format, vendor_number, vendor_number)

  from raj_table by sl_no asc

  SL_NO raj_id raj_number raj_format primary_id

  1                   1                   raj              rajvendor                 1

  1                   2                  raj              rajvendor                 1

  2                   3                   raj              rajvendor1                2

  2                   4                   raj              rajvendor1                2

  2                   5                  raj               rajvendor1                2

  3                   6                    raj              rajvendor2                3

  I need help with a SQL query to get the result as above without using the group by clause. I want to bring together the combination of separate line of the three columns (raj_id, raj_number, raj_format) and add a unique serial number for each online game (SL_NO column below). So, above there are 3 unique set of (raj_id, raj_number, raj_format) I can get in a group by clause, but I can not add prmiary_id, SL_NO values if I group by clause. I used the analytical functions like row_number() but no luck. Need solution for this.

  with t as)

  Select 'raj' raj_id, 'rajvend' raj_number, 1 raj_format, 1 primary_id Union double all the

  Select option 2, 'raj', 'rajvend', 1 double Union all

  Select 3, 'raj', 'rajvendor1', 2 double Union all

  Select 4, 'raj', 'rajvendor1', 2 double Union all

  Select 5, 'raj', 'rajvendor1', 2 double Union all

  Select 6, 'raj', 'rajvendor2', 3 double

  )

  Select dense_rank() over (order of raj_id, raj_number, raj_format) sl_no,

  t.*

  t

  order by primary_id

  /

  PRIMARY_ID RAJ RAJ_NUMBER RAJ_FORMAT SL_NO
  ---------- ---------- --- ---------- ----------
  1 1 raj rajvend 1
  1 2 raj rajvend 1
  2 3 raj rajvendor1 2
  2 4 raj rajvendor1 2
  2 5 raj rajvendor1 2
  3 6 raj rajvendor2 3

  6 selected lines.

  SQL >

  SY.

• Need help with PL/SQL query complex

  I need help with a query that need access to data from 3 tables. That's what I did
  
  I created 3 tables
  
  CREATE TABLE post_table
  (
  post_id varchar (20),
  datepost DATE,
  KEY (post_id) elementary SCHOOL
  ) ;
  
  CREATE TABLE topic
  (
  TOPIC_ID varchar (20),
  name varchar (20),
  PRIMARY KEY (topic_id)
  );
  
  CREATE TABLE blogpost_table
  (
  TOPIC_ID varchar (20),
  post_id varchar (20),
  PRIMARY KEY (topic_id, post_id);
  FOREIGN KEY (topic_id) REFERENCES topic (topic_id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
  FOREIGN KEY (post_id) REFERENCES post_table (post_id) ON DELETE CASCADE
  );
  
  
  Now, I inserted a few values in these tables as
  
  INSERT INTO post_table VALUES ('p1', to_date ('2009-09-14 18:00 "," MM/DD/YYYY mi:ss'));))
  INSERT INTO post_table VALUES ('p2', to_date ('2009-07-18 18:00 "," MM/DD/YYYY mi:ss'));))
  INSERT INTO post_table VALUES ('p3', to_date ('2009-07-11 18:00 "," MM/DD/YYYY mi:ss'));))
  INSERT INTO post_table VALUES ('p4', to_date ('2009-03-11 18:00 "," MM/DD/YYYY mi:ss'));))
  INSERT INTO post_table VALUES ('p5', to_date ('2009-07-13 18:00 "," MM/DD/YYYY mi:ss'));))
  INSERT INTO post_table VALUES ('p6', to_date ('2009-06-12 18:00 "," MM/DD/YYYY mi:ss'));))
  INSERT INTO post_table VALUES ('p7', to_date ('2009-07-11 18:00 "," MM/DD/YYYY mi:ss'));))
  
  INSERT INTO VALUES subject ("t1", "baseball");
  INSERT INTO category VALUES ('t2', 'football');
  
  INSERT INTO blogpost_table VALUES ("t1", "p1");
  INSERT INTO blogpost_table VALUES ('t1', 'p3');
  INSERT INTO blogpost_table VALUES ("t1", "p4");
  INSERT INTO blogpost_table VALUES ('t1', 'p5');
  INSERT INTO blogpost_table VALUES ('t2', 'p2');
  INSERT INTO blogpost_table VALUES ('t2', 'p6');
  INSERT INTO blogpost_table VALUES ("t2", "p7");
  
  
  I'm launching SQL queries on the table in this topic.
  
  I want to write a SQL query that returns me the name of a topic (s) and the number of blog_post (s) associated with the topic in descending order of the number of blog posts created in July.
  
  Can someone please help me to write this query?
  
  Thank you
  
  Published by: user11994430 on October 9, 2009 07:24

  Thanks for the test of the configuration!

  SQL>SELECT   t.NAME, COUNT(*)
    2      FROM topic t, blogpost_table b, post_table p
    3     WHERE b.topic_id = t.topic_id
    4       AND p.post_id = b.post_id
    5       AND p.datepost >= DATE '2009-07-01'
    6       AND p.datepost < DATE '2009-08-01'
    7  GROUP BY t.NAME
    8  ORDER BY COUNT(*) desc;
  
  NAME                   COUNT(*)
  -------------------- ----------
  baseball                      2
  soccer                        2
  

  HTH, Urs

• Need help with query Cumulative difference

  Hi all

  I need help with a query and my requirement is as below

  {code}

  ROWNO

  ORDERS

  VALUE

  1	10	900
  2	11	700
  3	12	500
  4	13	400

  {/ code}

  I have need to query which will display the cumulative difference for example I value tell 10000 numbers opening

  now I need for each of the lines of cumulative difference

  {code}

  ROWNO ORDERS DIFF

  1 10 10000 - 900 = 9100

  2 11 9100 - 700 = 8400

  3 12 8400 - 500 = 7900

  4 13 7900 - 400 = 7500

  {/ code}

  WITH commands LIKE (10 SELECT order_id, 900 double UNION ALL val
  11. SELECT, 700 FROM dual UNION ALL
  SELECT 12, 500 FROM dual UNION ALL
  Select 13, 400 double)

  SELECT row_number() over (ORDER BY order_id ASC) AS rowno
  order_id
  sum (val) 10000 - OVER (ORDER BY order_id ASC) AS diff
  orders

  /

  HTH

• Need help with query between 2 dates

  Hello

  I did not SEE in a long time and need help with a simple query.

  I have a table of DB access with 3 fields, name, date and number

  What I want is to create a query to retrieve all the names between 2 dates

  When I ask the date field, the results are showing in this formats 2013-07-12 00:00:00

  Here's my query

  < cfquery datasource = 'mydb' name = 'test' >

  SELECT name from myTable

  where edate between ' 2011-01-01 00:00:00 ' AND ' 2013-01-01 00:00:00 '

  < / cfquery >

  < cfoutput query = 'test' >

  #name #.

  < / cfoutput >

  What I get is this error

  ODBC = 22005 (assignment error) error code

  [Microsoft] [ODBC Microsoft Access driver] Type mismatch of data in the expression of the criteria.

  Don't know what I'm doing wrong here.

  Please let me know.

  Thank you

  SELECT ename

  FROM MyTable

  WHERE edate BETWEEN

  AND

  #ename #.

• Need help with Oracle SQL merge records according to date and term dates

  Hi all

  I need help to find this little challenge.

  I have groups and flags and effective dashboards and dates of term against these indicators according to the following example:

  GroupName	Flag_A	Flag_B	Eff_date	Term_date
  Group_A	THERE	THERE	20110101	99991231
  Group_A	N	N	20100101	20101231
  Group_A	N	N	20090101	20091231
  Group_A	N	N	20060101	20081231
  Group_A	N	THERE	20040101	20051231
  Group_A	THERE	THERE	20030101	20031231
  Group_B	N	THERE	20040101	99991231
  Group_B	N	THERE	20030101	20031231

  As you can see, group_A had the same combination of (N, N) flag for three successive periods. I want to merge all the time periods with the same indicators in one. Where entry into force will be the most early (underlined) time period and end date will be later (underlined)

  So the final result should look like this:

  GroupName	Flag_A	Flag_B	Eff_date	Term_date
  Group_A	THERE	THERE	20110101	99991231
  Group_A	N	N	20060101	20101231
  Group_A	N	THERE	20040101	20051231
  Group_A	THERE	THERE	20030101	20031231
  Group_B	N	THERE	20030101	99991231

  Thanks for your help

  Here's the DDL script

  drop table TMP_group_test;

  create table TMP_group_test (groupname varchar2 (8))

  , flag_a varchar2 (1)

  , flag_b varchar2 (1)

  , eff_date varchar2 (8)

  , term_date varchar2 (8)

  );

  insert into TMP_group_test values ('Group_A', 'Y', 'Y', ' 20110101 ', ' 99991231');

  insert into TMP_group_test values ('Group_A', 'n', ' n ', ' 20100101 ', ' 20101231');

  insert into TMP_group_test values ('Group_A', 'n', ' n ', ' 20090101 ', ' 20091231');

  insert into TMP_group_test values ('Group_A', 'n', ' n ', ' 20060101 ', ' 20081231');

  insert into TMP_group_test values ('Group_A', 'n', 'Y', ' 20040101 ', ' 20051231');

  insert into TMP_group_test values ('Group_A', 'Y', 'Y', ' 20030101 ', ' 20031231');

  insert into TMP_group_test values ('Group_B', 'n', 'Y', ' 20040101 ', ' 99991231');

  insert into TMP_group_test values ('Group_B', 'n', 'Y', ' 20030101 ', ' 20031231');

  commit;

  Post edited by: user13040446

  It is the closest, I went to the solution
  

  
  

  I create two rows;

  Rnk1: partition by group name, order of eff_date / / desc: this grade will sort the records of the most recent and handed to zero for each group\

  Rnk2: (dense) partition by group name, flag_A, flagb: this grade for each combination of group\flag gives a number so that they are classified as "families".

  Then I use the function analytic min

  Min (eff_date) more (partition of GroupName, rnk2): the idea is that, for each Member of the same family, the new date is the min of the family (and the max for the date of the term), at the end I just need separate so that the duplicates are gone

  Now the problem. As you can see from the query below, records of 1 and 6 (as identified by rownum) are identified in the same family, because they have the same combination of flag, but they are not successive, so everyone must keep its own date of entry into force.

  If only I can make the distinction between these two that would solve my problem

  
  

  Query:

  
  

  Select rowNum,GroupName, flag_a, flag_b, eff_date, term_date, rnk1, rnk2

  , min (eff_date) more than (partition by GroupName rnk2( ) min_eff

  Of

  (

  Select rowNum,

  GroupName , flag_a , flag_b , eff_date , term_date

  rank() more than (partition by GroupName stopped by eff_date desc) rnk1

  DENSE_RANK() more than (partition by GroupName order by flag_A flag_B ( ) rnk2

  de dsreports . tmp_group_test

  ) order by rowNum

  Hello

  user13040446 wrote:

  Hi KSI.

  Thanks for your comments, you were able to distinguish between these lines highlight, but lost lines 2,3,4 which are supposed to have the same date min = 20060101.

  Please see the table wanted to see the final result I want to reach

  Thanks again

  This first answer is basically correct, but in the main query, you want to use the function MIN, not the analytical function aggregation and GROUP BY columns with common values, like this:

  WITH got_output_group AS

  (

  SELECT GroupName, flag_a, flag_b, eff_date, term_date

  ROW_NUMBER () OVER (PARTITION BY GroupName

  ORDER BY eff_date

  )

  -ROW_NUMBER () OVER (PARTITION BY GroupName, flag_a, flag_b)

  ORDER BY eff_date

  ) AS output_group

  OF tmp_group_test

  )

  SELECT GroupName, flag_a, flag_b

  MIN (eff_date) AS eff_date

  MAX (term_date) AS term_date

  OF got_output_group

  GROUP BY GroupName, flag_a, flag_b

  output_group

  ORDER BY GroupName

  eff_date DESC

  ;

  The result I get is

  GROUP_NA F F EFF_DATE TERM_DAT

  -------- - - -------- --------

  Group_A Y 20110101 99991231 Y

  N Group_A 20101231 20060101 N

  Group_A N 20051231 20040101 Y

  Group_A Y Y 20031231-20030101

  Group_B N Y 99991231 20030101

  which is what you asked for.

• Need help with PL/SQL so and then select

  Hello guys, I am new to the PL/SQl programming (only Java experience) and I'm pretty stuck to my task. It would be great if you could help me. I am in programming with Oracle SQL * Plus Version 10.2.0.3.0

  Whenever a user logs on to the server a database entry is created with information about the logged-on user. I need to create a PL/SQL command that selects all the information from last month. Unfortunately, the date_stamp column has a certain weird format: 1131210 for December 10, 2013

  
  

  My idea so far:
  

  
  

  DECLARE

  v_today NUMBER;

  BEGIN

  v_today: = TO_NUMBER (TO_CHAR (SYSDATE, 'MM'));       -Save the number of the month (e.g.12) in v_today

  IF v_today = 01 THEN

  SELECT * from audittrl

  WHERE the date_stamp between 1131201 AND the 1131231;

  ELSIF v_today = 02 THEN

  SELECT * from audittrl

  WHERE the date_stamp between the 1130131 AND 1130101;

  .......

  END IF;

  END;

  /

  Error code: "an INTO clause in this SELECT statement.

  I do not want to save the result to select a variable, hope you can help me. Thanks in advance.

  Hello

  6a4d1bcd-c00e-4dac-AB64-9b6bdb1652d1 wrote:

  Thanks, I'll try that, if still get caught once, I'll be back. Anway I'm not sure of the solution of Chris227, because I can't test it right now. From my point of view it gives you information the current month (e.g., December) and not the month previous (-online November), or have I missed something. ?

  You are right.  In addition, it does not for a given year.  If you have data from several years in the table, it will select lines for the month of December 2012, 2011, 2010,... but also of 2013.

  Here's a way to get around that:

  DECLARE

  prev_month_start PLS_INTEGER: = TO_NUMBER (TO_CHAR (ADD_MONTHS (SYSDATE-1)

  , "YYMM"1' "01"

  )

  );

  this_month_start PLS_INTEGER: = TO_NUMBER (TO_CHAR (SYSDATE

  , "YYMM"1' "01"

  )

  );

  BEGIN
  FOR (IN) rec
  SELECT *.
  Of audittrl
  WHERE the date_stamp > = prev_month_start
  AND date_stamp< >
  ORDER BY user_id, date_stamp - or other

  )
  LOOP
  dbms_output.put_line (rec.date_stamp);
  dbms_output.put_line (rec.event);
  dbms_output.put_line (rec.user_id)
  dbms_output.put_line (rec.host_name);
  END LOOP;
  END;

  This should also be more effective, because it will allow the optimizer to use an index on date_stamp.  Even if there is no index, it will be more effective because it avoids calling any function (for example, SUBSTR) on each line of the table.

  You needn't PL/SQL to get these results.  Just use SQL, you might say:

  SELECT event, host_name, user_id and date_stamp
  Of audittrl
  WHERE the date_stamp > = TO_NUMBER (TO_CHAR (ADD_MONTHS (SYSDATE-1)
  , "YYMM"1' "01"
  )
  )
  AND date_stamp<  to_number="" (="" to_char="" (="" sysdate="" to_number="" (="" to_char="" (="">

  
  , "YYMM"1' "01"
  )
  )

  ORDER BY user_id, date_stamp - or other

  ;

  Your front end will provide column headers and touch the data so that the columns line up.  It can also set the output to a file.  (For example, if your front-end is SQL * Plus, you can use the command of the COIL.)

  I guess date_stamp is a NUMBER.  If it is a string, the solutions above can be simplified a bit.

  This problem (and many other problems) would be so much simpler if date_stamp was a DATE column.  Using numbers or strings to store the date information is simply asking for trouble.

• need help with query-please help

  Hi all
  I want to convert the query to a view online below. I write examples of data that I used

  create table pde(empno number(10),act_hour varchar(10 byte));
   
  Table created
   
  insert into pde values(211,'12:20');
  insert into pde values(211,'06:00');
  insert into pde values(213,'07:00');
  insert into pde values(213,'07:20');
   
  WITH  got_total_hours     AS
  (
       SELECT SUM (   TO_NUMBER (SUBSTR (act_hour, 1, 2))
                  + ( TO_NUMBER (SUBSTR (act_hour, 4, 2))
                    / 60
                    )
                  ) AS total_hours  
       from      pde
   
  )
  SELECT        TO_CHAR (FLOOR (total_hours))
         || ':'
         || TO_CHAR ( MOD (total_hours, 1) * 60
                , 'fm00'
                 )     AS hh_mm,empno,act_hour
  FROM     got_total_hours ,pde
   
  this is the output i am getting  
   
  HH_MM  EMPNO  ACT_HOUR
  32:40     211     12:20
  32:40     211     06:00
  32:40     213     07:00
  32:40     213     07:20
  
  i tried changing the above query to an inline view given below
  SELECT        TO_CHAR (FLOOR (total_hours))
         || ':'
         || TO_CHAR ( MOD (total_hours, 1) * 60
                , 'fm00'
                 )     AS hh_mm,act_hour from(SELECT SUM (   TO_NUMBER (SUBSTR (act_hour, 1, 2))
                  + ( TO_NUMBER (SUBSTR (act_hour, 4, 2))
                    / 60
                    )
                  ) AS total_hours  
       from      pde)
  
  ORA-00904:''ACT_HOUR":invalid identifier

  Please help me
  thanking in advance
  Kind regards
  oracleuser
  
  Published by: makdutakdu on January 5, 2010 11:41

  Just push "with the clause" within the main request and give an alias of the table for him... something like

   SELECT TO_CHAR (FLOOR (total_hours))
    || ':'
    || TO_CHAR ( MOD (total_hours, 1) * 60 , 'fm00' ) AS hh_mm,
    empno                                                     ,
    act_hour
     FROM
    (SELECT SUM ( TO_NUMBER (SUBSTR (act_hour, 1, 2)) + ( TO_NUMBER (SUBSTR (act_hour, 4, 2)) / 60 ) ) AS total_hours
       FROM pde
    ) got_total_hours ,
    pde
  

  Ravi Kumar

• Need help with query outputing group names

  I'm trying to find a way for groups of output headers, then all the records in each group etc header. It would be easy, except there is a key with what I want to do.

  Normally, if I have this data set (that I've ' borrowed' a site that showed the closest to what I was looking for):

  Example table:

  TABLE [number]

  (Name, NUMBER)

  Dave Bower 843-444-4444

  Dave Bower 843-555-5555

  Matthew Small 843-111-1111

  Matthew Small _843-222-2222

  Matthew Small 843-333-3333

  I could use the following code:

  < cfoutput query = "somequery" group = "name" >

  #name # < br >

  < cfoutput >

  #phonenumber # < br >

  < / cfoutput >

  < hr >

  < / cfoutput >

  And get this:

  Dave Bower

  843-444-4444.

  843-555-5555.

  -------------------

  Matthew Small

  843-111-1111.

  843-222-2222.

  843-333-3333.

  -------------------

  BUT my actual tables are not set up like that. Rather than recording of every name of every record, I would have an ID that is the foreign key to another table.

  Current table set up is as follows:

  TABLE [people]

  (ID, NAME)

  1 Dave Bower

  2 small Matthew

  TABLE [Phones]

  (PEOPLE_ID NUMBER)

  1 843-444-4444

  1 843-555-5555

  2 843-111-1111

  2 843-222-2222

  2 843-333-3333

  If this output actually would this give me with my current setup and request above code:

  1

  843-444-4444.

  843-555-5555.

  -------------------

  2

  843-111-1111.

  843-222-2222.

  843-333-3333.

  -------------------

  How can I keep my current setup but create a query that produces the same result from the top? (The table names of people like the group headers, but data from the phones table under that output)

  You must gather the two tables, and then group the output.

  Something along the lines of the (may vary slightly depending on your DB and the exact table structure)

  SELECT ppl.name, ph.number

  PEOPLE ppl

  INNER JOIN phones ph ON ppl.id = ph.people_id

  ORDER BY ppl.name

  See you soon

  Kai

• Need help with basic sql

  Hello
  
  I use oracle 10g and having some small doubts associated with sql, goes here of the situation
  
  I have a Transaction table, which contains the records/operation made by an employee under a code of pattern on different dates, see below examples of data
  

  EMP_CODE          REASON_CODE     DATE
  
  A001           B1                            1st Jan 2009
  A001          B1          3rd Jan 2009
  A001          B1          6rd Jan 2009
  A001          C2          9th Jan 2009
  
  A002          D4          1st Jan 2009
  A002          D4          3rd Jan 2009
  A002          D5          6rd Jan 2009
  
  A003          E6          6rd Jan 2009
  A003          E6          7rd Jan 2009

  Actually I want to have the final result as follows (p. ex. some how hide A003, see below for reason)
  

  A001          B1
  A001          C2
  A002          D4
  A002          D5

  So basically, print employee ID and reason code only if the employee has made the transaction under more than 1 code of reason, since the employee "A003" completed transaction code Minus 1 SINGLE code ONLY reason *, I don't want his record in printed.*
  
  the current query I wrote is as follows:
  

  select      emp_cd, reas_cd
  from      employee_trans_table
  where     reas_cd <> '   '
  group by emp_cd, reas_cd
  order by emp_cd, reas_cd

  but this impression of results as
  

  A001          B1
  A001          C2
  A002          D4
  A002          D5
  *A003          E6*

  How to avoid printing A003/E6 since she had only 1 reason code attached to it...
  
  
  I hope that I am able to clearly state the doubt that I am, let me know if you need any other info/clarrification on it.
  
  Concerning
  
  Learner
  
  Published by: learner1 on October 26, 2009 13:33
  
  Published by: learner1 on October 26, 2009 13:34
  
  Published by: learner1 on October 26, 2009 13:36
  
  Published by: learner1 on October 26, 2009 13:36 (added code tag)

  A possible solution.

  with data as
  (
    select 'A001' as col1, 'B1' as col2 from dual union all
    select 'A001' as col1, 'B1' as col2 from dual union all
    select 'A001' as col1, 'B1' as col2 from dual union all
    select 'A001' as col1, 'C2' as col2 from dual union all
    select 'A002' as col1, 'D4' as col2 from dual union all
    select 'A002' as col1, 'D4' as col2 from dual union all
    select 'A002' as col1, 'D5' as col2 from dual union all
    select 'A003' as col1, 'E6' as col2 from dual union all
    select 'A003' as col1, 'E6' as col2 from dual
  )
  select distinct col1, col2
  from
  (
    select col1, col2, count(distinct col2) over (partition by col1) as distinct_count
    from data
  )
  where distinct_count != 1
  

• IP number looking for PSI - need help with a sql solution better and faster

  Hello

  I have a table (one) with more 1 000 000 IP addresses and numbers (the digital equivalent of the IP address)

  I have a second table (b) which contains a mapping between the ranges of the ISP and IP. The table looks like this and more contains 150 000 entries:

  BEGIN_IP_RANGE END_IP_RANGE ISP_NAME

  --------------------------   ----------------------   --------------

  600000000 700000000 ISP_X

  800000000 900000000 ISP_Y

  I'm creating a third table (c) which connects (a) IP numbers to identify the ISP from (B). The query looks like this:

  CREATE TABLE c

  AS

  Select a.IP_ADDRESS

  b.ISP_NAME

  IP_NUMBERS a, ISP_LOOKUP b lkp

  where a.IP_NUMBER between b.BEGIN_IP_RANGE and b.END_IP_RANGE

  ;

  There is no key join between the 2 tables and so I use TO search for the access provider. The performace of it's terrible and table (c) takes several hours to create.

  Does anyone have any thoughts/ideas/suggestions on how this research can be achieved by using a solution better and faster?

  Thank you very much

  Shah

  The performace of it's terrible and table (c) takes several hours to create.

  Hours what do you say?

  See if the following can help.

  Cardinalities are similar to yours. The ETG takes 7sec. :

  SQL> create table ip_numbers (ip_address, ip_number) as
    2  select cast(to_char(level,'fm099G999G999G999', 'nls_numeric_characters=,.') as varchar2(15))
    3       , level
    4  from dual
    5  connect by level <= 1000000 ;
  
  Table created.
  
  SQL> select * from ip_numbers where rownum <= 10;
  
  IP_ADDRESS       IP_NUMBER
  --------------- ----------
  000.000.000.001          1
  000.000.000.002          2
  000.000.000.003          3
  000.000.000.004          4
  000.000.000.005          5
  000.000.000.006          6
  000.000.000.007          7
  000.000.000.008          8
  000.000.000.009          9
  000.000.000.010         10
  
  10 rows selected.
  
  SQL>
  SQL> create table isp_lookup (begin_ip_range, end_ip_range, isp_name) as
    2  select 1 + (level-1)*5
    3       , level*5
    4       , cast('ISP_'||to_char(level,'fm099999') as varchar2(10))
    5  from dual
    6  connect by level <= 200000 ;
  
  Table created.
  
  SQL> select * from isp_lookup where rownum <= 10;
  
  BEGIN_IP_RANGE END_IP_RANGE ISP_NAME
  -------------- ------------ ----------
               1            5 ISP_000001
               6           10 ISP_000002
              11           15 ISP_000003
              16           20 ISP_000004
              21           25 ISP_000005
              26           30 ISP_000006
              31           35 ISP_000007
              36           40 ISP_000008
              41           45 ISP_000009
              46           50 ISP_000010
  
  10 rows selected.
  
  SQL> create index ip_address_number_ix on ip_numbers (ip_number);
  
  Index created.
  
  SQL> set timing on
  SQL>
  SQL> create table ip_mappings as
    2  select /*+ use_nl(a b) */
    3         a.ip_address
    4       , b.isp_name
    5  from isp_lookup b
    6       join ip_numbers a on a.ip_number between b.begin_ip_range
    7                                            and b.end_ip_range
    8  ;
  
  Table created.
  
  Elapsed: 00:00:06.94
  SQL> select count(*) from ip_mappings;
  
    COUNT(*)
  ----------
     1000000
  
  Elapsed: 00:00:01.22
  

• Need help with a SQL

  Hi Experts,

  I have a table W_data where there are 2 fields (1) business_date and (2) ID Business_date is a date field havgnd dates daily while id is to have an id associated with each date. So, for a date, there is always a single record.

  I need to write a query so that I can retrieve the records for every sixth month by selecting the date of the minimum activity.

  Please advice.

  Thanks in advance.

  So far you have not posted an expected output.

  If you would like the earliest date in each half of the year and its corresponding ID, then

  Select min (WAH_BUSINESS_DATE), min (id), Dungeon (dense_rank of the first order by WAH_BUSINESS_DATE)

  of w_data

  Trunc ((to_number (to_char (WAH_BUSINESS_DATE, 'yyyyq') Group) + 1) / 2).

  Trunc (to_number(to_char...)) is to get a separate value for each semester, convert a different value of Q1 2013 and 2013 Q2 in a value and 2013 Q3 Q4 2013.

  On your published data, which gives:

  Date                         ID

  -------------------- ----------

  July 1, 2011 00:00:00 208596038

  January 1, 2012 00:00:00 223976512

  July 1, 2012 00:00:00 239761627

  January 1, 2013 00:00:00 256223102

  1 July 2013 00:00:00 272492185

• need help with query can find data back please help.

  Hi guys I have a table such as

  CREATE TABLE "FGL"
    (
      "FGL_GRNT_CODE" VARCHAR2(60),
      "FGL_FUND_CODE" VARCHAR2(60),
      "FGL_ACCT_CODE" VARCHAR2(60),
      "FGL_ORGN_CODE" VARCHAR2(60),
      "FGL_PROG_CODE" VARCHAR2(60),
      "FGL_GRNT_YEAR" VARCHAR2(60),
      "FGL_PERIOD"    VARCHAR2(60),
      "FGL_BUDGET"    VARCHAR2(60)
    )

  and I have a data as such

  Insert into FGL (FGL_GRNT_CODE,FGL_FUND_CODE,FGL_ACCT_CODE,FGL_ORGN_CODE,FGL_PROG_CODE,FGL_GRNT_YEAR,FGL_PERIOD,FGL_BUDGET) values ('240055','240055','7600','4730','02','11','1','400');
  Insert into FGL (FGL_GRNT_CODE,FGL_FUND_CODE,FGL_ACCT_CODE,FGL_ORGN_CODE,FGL_PROG_CODE,FGL_GRNT_YEAR,FGL_PERIOD,FGL_BUDGET) values ('240055','240055','7600','4730','02','10','1','100');
  Insert into FGL (FGL_GRNT_CODE,FGL_FUND_CODE,FGL_ACCT_CODE,FGL_ORGN_CODE,FGL_PROG_CODE,FGL_GRNT_YEAR,FGL_PERIOD,FGL_BUDGET) values ('240055','240055','7240','4730','02','10','1','0');
  Insert into FGL (FGL_GRNT_CODE,FGL_FUND_CODE,FGL_ACCT_CODE,FGL_ORGN_CODE,FGL_PROG_CODE,FGL_GRNT_YEAR,FGL_PERIOD,FGL_BUDGET) values ('240055','240055','7240','4730','02','10','14','200');
  Insert into FGL (FGL_GRNT_CODE,FGL_FUND_CODE,FGL_ACCT_CODE,FGL_ORGN_CODE,FGL_PROG_CODE,FGL_GRNT_YEAR,FGL_PERIOD,FGL_BUDGET) values ('240055','240055','7600','4730','02','10','14','100');
  Insert into FGL (FGL_GRNT_CODE,FGL_FUND_CODE,FGL_ACCT_CODE,FGL_ORGN_CODE,FGL_PROG_CODE,FGL_GRNT_YEAR,FGL_PERIOD,FGL_BUDGET) values ('240055','240055','7600','4730','02','10','2','100');
  Insert into FGL (FGL_GRNT_CODE,FGL_FUND_CODE,FGL_ACCT_CODE,FGL_ORGN_CODE,FGL_PROG_CODE,FGL_GRNT_YEAR,FGL_PERIOD,FGL_BUDGET) values ('240055','240055','7470','4730','02','10','2','200');

  I need bascially to get the total of the budget column. However this is not as simple as it sounds good (at least not for the me.) totals carried forward to the new period. you will notice that you have a period column. Basically, what im is that
  fgl_grant_year 10 1 period = account 7600 its $100 and $100 for the period 2, you see $ 100 more, it wants to not be added to this is the door on the balance. that is $100.
  So im trying to write a query that basically does the following.
  IM considering a period for the sake of this example let period 1 I get anything else. I find that the greates contributes dumpster year the amount for the period 14 (which corresponds to the total of the previous year) and add it to the amount of the current year. in this case period 1 grnt_year 11
  the expected result is therefore $700

  240055     240055     7240     4730     02     10     14     200
  240055     240055     7600     4730     02     10     14     100
  240055     240055     7600     4730     02     11     1     400

  do not forget that I am not given a just a period of the year.
  any help you guys can give would be immensely appreciated. I tried to get this to work for more than 3 days now.
  Finally broke down and put together this post
  
  Published by: mlov83 on Sep 14, 2011 20:48

  Hello

  Thanks for posting the CREATE TABLE and INSERT statemnts; It is very useful.

  I'm not sure that understand your needs.
  The correct output will be just one line:

  TOTAL_BUDGET
  ------------
           700
  

  or will it be 3 ranks that you posted? I guess you want just line after line.

  Do you mean that you are given a period (for example, 1).
  First you have to find the largest gfl_grnt_year which is related to this period (in this case, 11).
  Then you need to add fgl_budget lines that have to be
  (1) the specific period and the largest fgl_grnt_year, or
  (2) perriod = 14 and the previous fgl_grnt_year (in this case, 10).
  Is this fair?

  If so, here's a way to do it:

  WITH     got_greatest_year     AS
  (
       SELECT     fgl.*     -- or whatever columns are needed
       ,     MAX ( CASE
                   WHEN  fgl_period = :given_period
                   THEN  fgl_grnt_year
                  END
                ) OVER ()     AS greatest_year
       FROM     fgl
  )
  SELECT     SUM (fgl_budget)     AS total_budget     -- or SELECT *
  FROM     got_greatest_year
  WHERE     (     fgl_grnt_year     = greatest_year
       AND     fgl_period     = :given_period
       )
  OR     (     fgl_grnt_year     = greatest_year - 1
       AND     fgl_period     = 14
       )
  ;
  

  If you want the 3 lines you have posted, then change the main SELECT clause to ' SELECT * ' (or, instead of *, youcan the columns you want to see the list).

• Need help with query of queries

  I have the query 'almost' out there, but I don't know exactly how to proceed.
  
  I need all of the recrods meets the criteria of the query AppliedLicense.
  
  But not all records will have a match in the ApprovedLicense query.
  
  In the MergedData query I hope to have the column with date_exp filled with ApprovedLicense data when there is a football match but NULL if there is not a match.
  
  The code below, of course, only returns records where there is a match in the two data sources, but I have no idea how to proceed.
  
  Thanks for any help.
  
  

  You could do it yourself with functions of list if I hope, you do not have too many files. After executing the second query:

  
  You have now 2 lists of coordinates

  Subsequently during the processing of the first query,
  
  
  
  
  
  

• Need help with PL/SQL code

  Hi I am writing this code in pl/SQL:
  
  create or replace
  PROCEDURE 'TESTPRI '.
  (NUMBER pCYC_DT)
  AS
  vTGT_TABL VARCHAR2 (25);
  vSTG_TABL varchar2 (30);
  vsql varchar2 (200);
  BEGIN
  vTGT_TABL: = 'TESTTABL ';
  vSTG_TABL: = vTGT_TABL | » _'|| pCYC_DT;
  vsql: = 'TRUNCATE TABLE ' | vTGT_TABL;
  EXECUTE IMMEDIATE vsql;
  RUN IMMEDIATELY "INSERT" | vTGT_TABL | ' SELECT * FROM '. vSTG_TABL;
  COMMIT;
  -IMMEDIATE 'TRUNCATE TABLE ' | vSTG_TABL;
  END TESTPRI;
  
  When executing this procedure it gives me following error:
  ORA-03290: Invalid command truncate - lack of key word TABLE or CLUSTER
  ORA-06512: at "DBR. TESTPRI', line 11
  ORA-06512: at line 6
  
  But I think that the TRUNCATE TABLE statement is correct. Is there a problem with the variable?
  
  Any help would be appreciated.
  Thank you.

  vsql: = 'TRUNCATE TABLE ' | vTGT_TABL;

  You need space after the TABLE

  vsql:= 'TRUNCATE TABLE ' ||vTGT_TABL ; 
  

  EXECUTE IMMEDIATE vsql;
  RUN IMMEDIATELY "INSERT" | vTGT_TABL | ' SELECT * FROM '. vSTG_TABL;

  Sapce here after INTO, before SELECT and FROM

  EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'INSERT INTO '|| vTGT_TABL||' SELECT * FROM '|| vSTG_TABL;