Need to answer with Create Table

Hi guys OTN.

I would ask, what is the difference between this two syntax.

create table table_name as
select * from other_table;

and

create table table_name as
(select * from other_table);

Thank you and more power!

Hello

Cloud Nines Bliss wrote:
Hi guys OTN.

I would ask, what is the difference between this two syntax.
create table table_name as
select * from other_table;
and
create table table_name as
(select * from other_table);

There is no difference. Oracle allows often in brackets when they are not needed. For example:

SELECT  SYSDATE - (1 / 24)    AS one_hour_ago
FROM    dual;

The result would be the same if you have lost the parentheses, but it is nice to make in this case, to clarify that the / operation is being doen before the...

Tags: Database

Similar Questions

Problem with create table as select (DEC)
Hello

We try to data cleaning of huge tables. And a customer of guise is reanme main table to the backup table. Then create a master table in select * backup table with some test.

Now the problem with create table select, is that it creates the table without indexes and constraints. Is it possible to use the ETG (create the select table) with the same structure that he was the (all index, constriaints).

Or any other solution to solve this problem?

Thanks in advance
Sweety wrote:
Hello

We try to data cleaning of huge tables. And a customer of guise is reanme main table to the backup table. Then create a master table in select * backup table with some test.

Now the problem with create table select, is that it creates the table without indexes and constraints. Is it possible to use the ETG (create the select table) with the same structure that he was the (all index, constriaints).

Or any other solution to solve this problem?

Thanks in advance

No, this is not possible. You need to get the manuscript of dependent object and create it manually.

Problem with creating tables DB DWH
Hello
During the generation of tables of data warehouse (dry 4.10.1 how to create the Data Warehouse Tables), I got to the top with an error indicating that "Datawarehouse Creating tables failed '.
But when I checked in the log "generate_ctl.log" file, it has the message below:

+ "Schema will be created in the following containers: +"
Oracle 11.5.10
Oracle R12
Universal

Conflict between containers:

---------------------------------------------
Table name: W_BOM_ITEM_FS
Column name: INTEGRATION_ID.
+ Column properties that are different: [keyTypeCode] +.
---------------------------------------------

Success! "

When I checked in the database of DWH, I find tables DWH, but do not know if all tables have been created?
Can someone tell me if my DWH tables are all created? Tables of how much would be created for EBS containers above?
Also, should I have to drop a container of EBS to create tables DWH successfully?

The Installation guide States when creating tables DWH fails then "createtables.log" will not be created. But in my case, this log file is created.

Published by: userOO7 on November 19, 2008 14:41
Even if you do the install with DBA role, it will fail is that sse_role is not present. Please, create it and try again. You must also create a user of separate database to the data warehouse that is separate from the repository of DAC. Then you can remove and re-create the account of data warehouse without losing the DAC repository.

4.3.4.1 create databases
http://download.Oracle.com/docs/CD/E12127_01/doc/BIA.795/e12083/windows_ic.htm#i1081422

Problem with Create Table from target in CKM Oracle
In CKM following Oracle are:
create table < % = snpRef.getTable ("L", "CHECK_NAME", "W") % >
(
Catalog_name < %=snpRef.getDataType ("DEST_VARCHAR", "100", "") % > < % = snpRef.getInfo ("DEST_DDL_NULL") % >.
Schema_name < %=snpRef.getDataType ("DEST_VARCHAR", "100", "") % > < % = snpRef.getInfo ("DEST_DDL_NULL") % >.
RESOURCE_NAME < %=snpRef.getDataType ("DEST_VARCHAR", "100", "") % > < % = snpRef.getInfo ("DEST_DDL_NULL") % >.
FULL_RES_NAME < %=snpRef.getDataType ("DEST_VARCHAR", "100", "") % > < % = snpRef.getInfo ("DEST_DDL_NULL") % >.
ERR_TYPE < %=snpRef.getDataType ("DEST_VARCHAR", "1", "") % > < % = snpRef.getInfo ("DEST_DDL_NULL") % >.
ERR_MESS < %=snpRef.getDataType ("DEST_VARCHAR", "250", "") % > < % = snpRef.getInfo ("DEST_DDL_NULL") % >.
CHECK_DATE < %=snpRef.getDataType ("DEST_DATE", "", "") % > < % = snpRef.getInfo ("DEST_DDL_NULL") % >.
ORIGINAL < %=snpRef.getDataType ("DEST_VARCHAR", "100", "") % > < % = snpRef.getInfo ("DEST_DDL_NULL") % >.
CONS_NAME < %=snpRef.getDataType ("DEST_VARCHAR", "35", "") % > < % = snpRef.getInfo ("DEST_DDL_NULL") % >.
CONS_TYPE < %=snpRef.getDataType ("DEST_VARCHAR", "2", "") % > < % = snpRef.getInfo ("DEST_DDL_NULL") % >.
ERR_COUNT < %=snpRef.getDataType ("DEST_NUMERIC", "10", "") % > < % = snpRef.getInfo ("DEST_DDL_NULL") % >
)

What is product is...
create the table ETL_STAGING. SNP_CHECK_TAB
(
CATALOG_NAME VARCHAR2 (100 CHAR) NULL,
SCHEMA_NAME VARCHAR2 (100 CHAR) NULL,
RESOURCE_NAME VARCHAR2 (100 CHAR) NULL,
FULL_RES_NAME VARCHAR2 (100 CHAR) NULL,
ERR_TYPE VARCHAR2 (1 CAR) NULL,
ERR_MESS VARCHAR2 (250 CHAR) NULL,
CHECK_DATE DATE NULL,.
ORIGINAL VARCHAR2 (100 CHAR) NULL,
CONS_NAME VARCHAR2 (35 CHAR) NULL,
CONS_TYPE VARCHAR2 (2 CHAR) NULL,
ERR_COUNT NUMBER (10) NULL
)

Why it adds the word TANK in parenthesis? Anyone?

Tom Cusick
Hello

Follow these steps:

(1) go to the topology

(2) physical architecture

(3) modify the Oracle (directory) technology

4) go to the tab "other".

(5) change the "String Mask" (4º-text box) to: VARCHAR2 (%)

That will solve the problem.

Cezar Santos

Need help with creating table that inserts the lines according to the amount of data

Hello
I try to create a table for supervisors to enter their subordinates of information and inserts lines for supervisors with several of his subordinates. This form is not be connected to a data source, the supervisors will be simply fill out the form and print. I want it sort of look like this:
Name Position # Ranking Hours
I really appreciate any help. Thank you!

Hi Laura,

It's very strange. I downloaded a new version on the site and it works perfectly. The script is in the right place.

I can sugggest you right click on the download link and select "save a copy as" the alternative menu. This should save the form locally and from there, you should be able to open it in Acrobat.

If you are a Mac, make sure that the form opens in preview from Apple.

Also make sure that Javascript is enabled in Acrobat (in the preferences window).

Niall

Need some answers with re-construction of my site to the fluid network

Hi guys, I'm rebuilding my site at fluid network.
The 5 first mainpages are downloaded on a test site: http://www.Hoddenbagh.nl/bibleopentest/index.html
Now I begin to rebuild the pages of the study. One is over except that there are a few things that I can't do right. And I used a JavaScript to get the pop up windows, which work well, but I hope that there is a better way to do it.
OK questions:
1. How can I add space above the first line under the orange heading? http://www.Hoddenbagh.nl/bibleopentest/armour.html . I tried < br > and < p > < / p >
2, as said I use Javascript to get the texts of the bible-thet when users click on the reference text, but I like it much better when the text appears in a small window when the Viewer is appropriate on the text, or click top, and then click. Again, I have used it on this page: http://www.hoddenbagh.nl/bibleopentest/armour.html
3. near the end of the page, I tried to ad an ordered list. The code is in the HTML code, but it does not appear in the browser of the thw. I tried to change the settings for the list, but then the navigation bar is changing as well, and I don't want that.
I hope I get some answers
Laurens

To create a space between groups of the sorted list, add the following. Adjust the values according to your needs.

{of the ol

padding-top: 2%;

padding-bottom: 2%;

}

Nancy O.

CREATE TABLE... COMPRESS

Hello
I'm trying the COMPRESSION with CREATE TABLE option. I wanted to just understand if we need the "Advanced Compression" option turned on.
That requires an additional license?
Kind regards
Vikram

Compression of the base table is available without an additional license for Oracle Enterprise Edition.

Editions of Oracle database

Options and Packs

Need help - multilevel nested table - create table problem

Hello
My version of oracle db: 11g
I just created a table that contains a nested multi-level table.
Here is the code:
create or replace type sdef_t_nt_empNames21 is table of the varchar2 (50);
create or replace type sdef_ot_SCmarks21 as an object (number of physics, chemistry number, number of Biology);
create or replace type sdef_t_nt_SCmarks21 is table of the sdef_ot_SCmarks21;
create or replace type sdef_ot_allsubmarks21 as an object (eid, eng, math, sc sdef_t_nt_SCmarks21 number number);
create or replace type sdef_t_nt_dep_m_info21 is table of the sdef_ot_allsubmarks21;
create the table nt_dep21
(number of fact
, dname varchar2 (50)
c_sdef_t_nt_empNames21 sdef_t_nt_empNames21
c_sdef_t_nt_dep_m_info21 sdef_t_nt_dep_m_info21)
nested as NT_c_sdef_t_nt_empNames21 table c_sdef_t_nt_empNames21 store
store table nested like NT_c_sdef_t_nt_dep_m_info21; c_sdef_t_nt_dep_m_info21 <-I know that the problem is here.
TRACE OF THE ERROR:
Error at startup on line: 13 in the command.
create the table nt_dep21
(number of fact
, dname varchar2 (50)
c_sdef_t_nt_empNames21 sdef_t_nt_empNames21
c_sdef_t_nt_dep_m_info21 sdef_t_nt_dep_m_info21)
nested as NT_c_sdef_t_nt_empNames21 table c_sdef_t_nt_empNames21 store
Nested table c_sdef_t_nt_dep_m_info21 (sdef_t_nt_SCmarks21) store as NT_c_sdef_t_nt_dep_m_info21
Error report-
SQL error: ORA-00904: invalid identifier
00904, 00000 - '% s: invalid identifier '.
* Cause:
* Action:
PS: I'm just solve a problem given to me by some1, is not a practical implementation, I'm just trying to get through
I'm sure that some1 could help me with this, I have searched a lot of this problem but could not find my answer, please help me.
Concerning
Rahul

SQL > create table (nt_dep21)
Did number 2,
3 dname varchar2 (50).
4 c_sdef_t_nt_empNames21 sdef_t_nt_empNames21,
c_sdef_t_nt_dep_m_info21 5 sdef_t_nt_dep_m_info21
6 )
store c_sdef_t_nt_empNames21 7 nested as NT_c_sdef_t_nt_empNames21 table
store c_sdef_t_nt_dep_m_info21 8 table nested as NT_c_sdef_t_nt_dep_m_info21)
9 table nested as NT_sc sc store
10 )
11.

Table created.

SQL >

SY.

Create view opaque in OBIEE with multiple tables

Hello
I need assistance with the opaque view since I've never created in the past. I want to create an opaque view that retrieves data from several tables. Is it possible to do? Or y at - it another alternative available in OBIEE option? I read the blog following and other similar articles on views opaque but found no option to use for the query with several tables:
Oracle Business Intelligence: A physical layer to OBIEE 10 g Opaque View Creation

Also please advice how to join two tables from different databases in OBIEE?

Kindly advice.

Kind regards
Andy

Check also, it may be useful to you

http://obinsight.blogspot.com/2010/05/reporting-against-multiple.html

Creating table in the schema has with the user B and granting permissions to the user C
Hello, I have a problem fun - we have a large table which requires a batch to make millions of updates, and he needs to finish more quickly. It takes several hours as an update, but a select create table did the same thing in about a minute. Yay! Then we just delete the old table and rename the new table to the former, rebuild all the index and grant select/insert/update/delete permissions to another user who needs access... and there is the problem, Oracle said insufficient privs.

We have A figure, which is the owner of the table, userid B who done all the stuff of application batch and userid C which performs inserts for a process of middleware. None of them are actual users, of course. We want that user B to do the ETG, rename, rebuild and re-grant of the authorisation of the index. But user B apparently cannot grant permissions on objects in the schema A to user C, even if B has created the table and has the role DBA (not ideal, I know)!

What's really crazy is that there is no sense unique user b can grant permissions to user C, which is to:

grant select any table USER c;
grant insert any table USER c;
grant update any table USER c;
Grant delete any table USER c;

It seems really perverse can create tables in diagram A and even grant C privs "whole table" that user B, but may not grant privs specifically on this object in the schema A, even with DBA privs. I must be missing something... right?
Yes. By default, the stored procedures are stored procedures from DEFINER rights. If A is the owner of a stored procedure, this stored procedure can do whatever A enjoys the privileges to directly. If A grants B privileges RUN this stored procedure, when B calls the stored procedure, the procedure runs with the privileges.

I agree point stew, however, re-creating objects in Oracle is generally a bad idea and a TRUNCATE with one insert direct-path, possibly combined with the deactivation and the rebuilding of the index would be more appropriate than a DEC. If you're going to stick with this Assignment, however, that really do in a stored procedure owned by A while B has no need to CREATE ANY TABLE.

Justin

create table as a table with nested column type
On my Oracle DB (11.1), I have a table with a nested as a column type (and it is a partitioned table).
Now I need to copy partitions in a second table, and I use swap partition for it (with a table that is not partitioned as a table in step).

But there is a problem, because as the ordinary as sql ddl:
```
create table table1_stage as select * from table1 where 1=2;
```
does not work when there is a table nested within a column type.
Is it possible easy to copy its structure (and to create the table that is not partitioned, so I suppose that no dbms_metadata package would help)?

Kind regards...
>
does not work when there is a table nested within a column type.
>

Will work indeed.

Read this
```
SQL> CREATE TYPE typtst IS TABLE OF VARCHAR2 (100);
  2
  3  /

Type created.

SQL> CREATE TABLE test1
  2  (
  3     col1   VARCHAR2 (100),
  4     col2   typtst
  5  )
  6  NESTED TABLE col2
  7     STORE AS list1;

Table created.

SQL> CREATE TABLE test2
  2  NESTED TABLE col2
  3     STORE AS list2
  4  AS
  5     SELECT * FROM test1;

Table created.

SQL> 
```
G.

what need parameter should be ignored for creating table in LMT
Hi all

I have locally managed tablespace (LMT) with the type of ventilation SYSTEM and segment_space_management is AUTOMATIC. My database is Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi.

I have for example:

create table (ID)
PCTFREE 5
INITTRANS 2
STORAGE (Initial...).

Oracle documnetation, I found that it is recommended to omit the storage clause when you use LMT.

I want to know, I do also omit PCTFREE 5, INITTRANS 2 of the create table statement?

Thanks for any advice.
Dear spur230,

Yes, you can omit these parameters either.

Here's the answer to your question;

http://download.Oracle.com/docs/CD/B19306_01/server.102/b14231/tspaces.htm#sthref1153

+"+
* + Creating a locally managed Tablespace + *.

+ Create a locally managed tablespace by specifying IN clause of the CREATE TABLESPACE statement SCOPE MANAGEMENT. This is the default value for new permanent storage space, but you must specify the EXTENT MANAGEMENT LOCAL clause if you want to specify the AUTOALLOCATE or the UNIFORM clause. You can have the database to manage extensions for you automatically with the clause AUTOALLOCATE (default), or you can specify that the tablespace is managed with uniform extents of a specific size (UNIFORM). +

+ If you plan the tablespace contains objects of various sizes, requiring many scopes with different sizes, then AUTOALLOCATE is the best choice. AUTOALLOCATE is also a good choice if it is not important for you to have a lot of control over the allocation of space and the deallocation, because it simplifies the management of the table space. A space may be wasted with this parameter, but the advantage of having the Oracle database manage your space probably outweigh this disadvantage. +

+ If you want exact control on unused space, and you can predict exactly the space to allocate for an object or objects and the number and size of extensions, and then UNIFORM is a good choice. This setting ensures that you will never have the unusable space in your tablespace. +

* + When you do not explicitly specify the type of management, database Oracle determines management extended as follows: + *.

+ * _If the CREATE TABLESPACE statement omits the DEFAULT storage clause, then the database creates a locally managed tablespace autoallocated. _ +
+ * _If the CREATE TABLESPACE statement includes a default storage clause, then the database considers the following: _ +.
+ O _If you specified AS MINIMUM clause, the database evaluates if MEASURE MINIMUM values, INITIAL, FOLLOWING are equal, and the value for PCTINCREASE is 0. If so, the database creates a locally managed tablespace uniform with size = INITIAL measurement. If the parameters to MEASURE MINIMUM INITIAL and NEXT are not equal, otherwise PCTINCREASE is not 0, the database ignores storage extent parameters you specify and creates a locally managed tablespace autoallocated. _ +
+ o _If you have not specified a MEASURE MINIMUM clause, the database evaluates only if the values of storage are the same INITIAL and NEXT and PCTINCREASE is 0. If so, the tablespace is locally managed and uniform. Otherwise, the tablespace is locally managed and autoallocated. _ +

+ The following statement creates a managed tablespace locally named lmtbsb and specifies AUTOALLOCATE: +.

+ CREATE TABLESPACE lmtbsb DATAFILE ' / u02/oracle/data/lmtbsb01.dbf' SIZE 50 +.
+ EXTENT MANAGEMENT LOCAL AUTOALLOCATE; +

+ AUTOALLOCATE causes tablespace system managed with a volume of minimum extent of 64K. +

+ The alternative to AUTOALLOCATE is UNIFORM. who says that the tablespace is managed with uniform size extents. You can specify the size of the uniform SIZE clause. If you omit the SIZE, the default size is 1 M. +

+ The following example creates a tablespace with uniform extents of 128 K. (In a database with 2 K blocks, each would amount to 64 blocks of data). Each measure 128K is represented by a bit in the bitmap extent for this file. +

+ CREATE TABLESPACE lmtbsb DATAFILE ' / u02/oracle/data/lmtbsb01.dbf' SIZE 50 +.
+ EXTENT MANAGEMENT LOCAL UNIFORM SIZE 128K; +

+ You can not specify the storage, TEMPORARY or MEASURE MINIMUM clause by DEFAULT when you explicitly specify EXTENT MANAGEMENT LOCAL. If you want to create a locally managed temporary tablespace, use the statement to CREATE a TEMPORARY TABLESPACE. +
+"+

Hope that helps.

Ogan

Creating Tables with a Script
I am trying to create tables using a script, but it seems that the consecutive statements in the script will not run - someone ' one can tell me what I need to use the syntax?

****************************************************************************
Here is my script - I use SQL-Plus:

CREATE TABLE parts
(region_id NUMBER
NOT NULL CONSTRAINT Region_id_nn
, region_name VARCHAR2 (25)
)

CREATE TABLE countries
(country_id TANK (2)
NOT NULL CONSTRAINT Country_id_nn
, country_name VARCHAR2 (40)
region_id NUMBER
CONSTRAINT Country_c_id_pk
PRIMARY KEY (country_id)
)
INDEX OF THE ORGANIZATION

Here's what I touch in:

SQL > get c:\oracle\test.txt

Here is the error that comes out:

1 parts of CREATE TABLE
2 (region_id NUMBER
3 region_id_nn of CONSTRAINT NOT NULL
4, region_name VARCHAR2 (25)
5)
6 countries in CREATE TABLE
7 (country_id TANK (2)
8 country_id_nn of CONSTRAINT NOT NULL
9, country_name VARCHAR2 (40)
10, region_id NUMBER
11, CONSTRAINT country_c_id_pk
12 PRIMARY KEY (country_id)
13)
14 * ORGANIZATION INDEX
15 run;
CREATE TABLE countries
*
ERROR on line 6:
ORA-00922: missing or not valid option
****************************************************************************
If trim down the script - just 1 create table command, none of the semicolons, this works:

Script:

CREATE TABLE parts
(region_id NUMBER
NOT NULL CONSTRAINT Region_id_nn
, region_name VARCHAR2 (25)
)

Key in:
SQL > get c:\oracle\test.txt
1 parts of CREATE TABLE
2 (region_id NUMBER
3 region_id_nn of CONSTRAINT NOT NULL
4, region_name VARCHAR2 (25)
5 *)
SQL > execute;

Receive:

1 parts of CREATE TABLE
2 (region_id NUMBER
3 region_id_nn of CONSTRAINT NOT NULL
4, region_name VARCHAR2 (25)
5 *)

Table created.
****************************************************************************
adding a semicolon between the instructions in create table does not solve this problem - anyone got any ideas?

Thank you

-Tom
Please see this for more information on the GET sqlplus command.

http://download.Oracle.com/docs/CD/A97630_01/server.920/a90842/ch13.htm#1009882
```
Get command Loads a host operating system file into the SQL buffer.

*The operating system file should contain a single SQL statement or PL/SQL block*.
The statement should not be terminated with a semicolon. If a SQL*Plus command or
more than one SQL statement or PL/SQL block is loaded into the SQL buffer from an
operating system file, an error occurs when the RUN or slash (/) command is used to
execute the buffer.
```
I hope it is clear now. So if you want to run a script that may contain more then one of SQL statements, create a file * .sql, put all the instructions, complete with a semicolon and run as follows:

SQL > @script_name.sql

Unable to create cache with several tables group
Hello

I need to create a group of cache with several tables, which are referential to the other.

There are 2 related tables and table 1 child...
While trying this thing, it gives me an error:

8222: multiple parent tables found

It is not possible to use several tables of root in a single cache group? Is there another way to use it?

Script, I used is:

create a cache group asynchronous writethrough TEST. CG1
of the TEST. ROOT1)
KEY PRIMARY ID VARCHAR2 (8 BYTES),
NAME VARCHAR2 (50 BYTE),
DESCRIPTION VARCHAR2 (255 BYTE),
POLICYTYPEID VARCHAR2 (7-BYTE)),

TEST. ROOT2)
PARAMTYPEID VARCHAR2 (5 BYTES) PRIMARY KEY,
PARAMETERUSAGE VARCHAR2 (1 BYTE),
NAME VARCHAR2 (25 BYTE),
DESCRIPTION VARCHAR2 (255 BYTE)),

TEST. CHILD1)
PARAMDETAILID NUMBER (20) PRIMARY KEY,.
ID VARCHAR2 (8 BYTE),
PARAMETERUSAGE VARCHAR2 (1 BYTE),
DISPLAYVALUE VARCHAR2 (255 BYTE),
OPERATORID VARCHAR2 (5 BYTE),
VENDORID NUMBER (20).
FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES TEST. ROOT1 (ID),
TEST KEY (PARAMETERUSAGE) REFERENCES STRANGERS. ROOT2 (PARAMETERUSAGE));
You can't have multiple root within a group of cache tables. The requirements for tables in the group a cache are very strict; There must be only one top-level (root table) table and there may possibly be several children tables. Tables of the child should be linked through foreign keys to the root table or a child table above in the hierarchy.

The solution for your case is among the tables of root and the other root table in a separate cache group and the child table in a cache group. If you do this, you must take care of a few things:

1. you cannot define foreign keys between the tables of groups of different cache in TimesTen (keys may exist in Oracle) so the application must enforce referential integrity itself for these cases.

2. If you load data in a cache group (using LOAD the GROUP CACHE or "load we demand") and Timesten will not automatically load the corresponding data in the other group of cache (since he doesn't know the relationship). The application must load the data into the other group of cache explicitly.

There is no problem with transactional consistency when changes are pushed to Oracle. TimesTen maintains and reinforces the coherence transactional regardless of how the tables are arranged in groups cache correctly.

Chris

'Create table' is not possible with Jet.OLEDB.4.0

I use LabVIEW Toolkit DB to access databases.

I opened an access database of microsoft with the connection string "Provider = Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0; Data Source = C:\test3.accdb".

When I exeucted

create table leq_octave_5min (recorded_time DATETIME CONSTRAINT PRIMARY KEY pk1,
Leq5 LEQ5 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Min MIN FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Max MAX FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
L05 FLOAT L05 CONSTRAINT NOT NULL,.
L10 FLOAT L10 CONSTRAINT NOT NULL,.
L50 FLOAT L50 CONSTRAINT NOT NULL,.
L.90 L.90 FLOAT CONSTRAINT NOT NULL,
L95 FLOAT L95 CONSTRAINT NOT NULL,.
Us01 us01 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
EN02 EN02 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr03 FR03 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr04 fr04 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr05 fr05 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr06 fr06 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr07 fr07 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr08 FR08 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr09 FR09 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr10 fr10 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr11 FR11 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr12 FR12 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr13 FR13 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr14 FR14 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr15 FR15 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr16 FR16 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr17 FR17 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr18 FR18 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr19 FR19 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr20 FR20 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr21 FR21 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr22 FR22 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
E23, e23 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr24 FR24 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr25 fr25 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr26 FR26 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr27 fr27 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr28 FR28 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr29 FR29 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr30 FR30 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
status TEXT (2) st NOT NULL CONSTRAINT)

I got an error saying "error ADO: 0x80040E14.

I have not had any problems with an ODBC driver.

Why make such a mistake with Jet OLE DB?

A web page was told that MIN and MAX are reserved words of Jet 4.0.

So I defined with [and].

Then, after it works.

Need to answer with Create Table

Similar Questions

Maybe you are looking for