No direct reading.

Dell Inspiron 1501

Windows XP Media Center Edition

SP2

I never had this work and just decided I would try it out. I read that Dell provided their laptops with live monitoring power off. I tried the regedit and am sure I did it right. I then restart my computer, and when I go to the part where we can read:

"2. in the Options menu, select Properties.

3. under "Show the following volume controls" check the input monitor. Click OK. »

I do not end up see entry monitor... so I can't check.

I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. My audio works fine. I can record and then play again. I don't know that this is not just cut in the Volume controls.

Thank you and I would be very grateful if you can solve this problem. Let me know if you need more info.

Message edited by jonny01 on 14/06/2008 10:39

Tags: Dell Laptop

Similar Questions

  • My direct read anchor point selection tool and the handle when on these points, but is now box or anything. How do I change back.

    My direct read anchor point selection tool and the handle when on these points, but is now box or anything. How do I change back.

    Turn on view > Smart guides.

  • "path direct reading temp '-P1

    Hello!

    One of my active sessions waiting 'the direct path read temp' event.
    Average P1 number settings file and at the same time why this grater number as:
    select max(file#) from v$ datafile;
    I'm usung 10.2.0.5

    Thank you and best regards,
    Pavel

    The file referenced in the direct path read temp"wait event is a temporary file.
    EEG, the number of file to a temporary file, you need to subtract the number P1 file db max.
    You can get the maximum number of db files with
    {code}
    Select the value of the parameter $ v where name = 'db_files '.
    {code}
    After getting the file number of the temporary file, you must look at v$ tempfile for further details.

    Lordane Iotzov
    http://iiotzov.WordPress.com/

  • force direct read instead of memory

    Hello

    is it possible via a tip or something to force oracle does not put blocks of a sql for the buffer cache and read directly to disk every time? That's a test question.

    Thank you all

    He has hidden parameter serialdirect_read.
    The allowed values depend on the version:
    before 11R2 - true or false
    11R2 - true/false/always/never/auto

    alter session set "_serial_direct_read"=true 
    

    It works in any version > = 8i.

  • Is it reasonable to require a Full table Scan (Direct path read) on a large Table

    Hello

    I have an Oracle 11.2.0.3 on a Sun Solaris 10 sparc with SGA 25 GB machine

    One of my made SQL an analysis of indexes on the table to 45 GB where the size of the index is 14FR and the thourghput for the sequential read is 2MBPS.

    so now (Index) 14 000 Mo, 14 GB / 2 MB = dry 7000 = 2 hours to scan the index.

    Flow of the direct path read is 500 Mbps for an another SQL and reads assimilate them all live.

    and because of this flow, a read (FTS) of direct path on the table of 7 GB out in 12-13 seconds. So in my case, it probably takes 100 seconds to scan the entire table. It is a monthly report and does not often.

    Should I try to use a trick to force sql to do a full scan and exploit the possibilities of direct reading and is done in a few minutes? Assuming it to do a FTS (direct play)

    Of course, it will be tested and verified, but the question is, is this a sensible apprioach? is - anyone has experience by forcing it?

    Any suggestions would be helpful... I'll test this on a different machine tomorrow.

    Best regards

    Maran

    82million lines and a grouping of 18million factor?  And really 17million from lines to recover?  However, your result set after the hash join is 3500 lines, although the optimizer expects 16 lines.

    I would say that the statistics are not representative or not in use for this SQL.  Certainly, the index does not match query predicates.

    The fact that the index is also using the virtual columns only adds to confusion.

    Hemant K Collette

  • With regard to 'Direct Path read' expected

    As we know, the direct path read waits is a new feature of Oracle 11 g. Oracle Documents or other objects, when it's the full table scan, direct path reading took place. But why it happened?  I don't know clearly.

    Here is the description of the Oracle Document:

    http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E18283_01/server.112/e17110/waitevents003.htm#sthref3849

    During operations of Direct Reading of data asynchronously access path in the database files. At some point, the session must ensure that all the asynchronous i/o in circulation have been realized on the drive. This can also happen if during a direct reading without more slots is available for storing exceptional load requests (a charge application might consist of several e/s).


    Question:

    1 during operations of Direct data asynchronously reading path in database files.  > > this statement means what? What of "asynchronous reading '?

    2 describe above description for me in details.

    3. who can clearly explain "why read direct path wait to happen ' for me?


    Thanks in advance.

    Lonion


    Lonion wrote:

    Question:

    1. to path operations Direct playback of data asynchronously in the database files.  > This statement means what? What of "asynchronous reading '?

    2 describe above description for me in details.

    3. who can clearly explain "why read direct path wait to happen ' for me?

    If you want to get very technical, Frits Hoogland wrote a lot about the implementation:

    http://fritshoogland.WordPress.com/2013/05/09/direct-path-read-and-fast-full-index-scans/

    http://fritshoogland.WordPress.com/2013/01/04/Oracle-11-2-and-the-direct-path-read-event/

    http://fritshoogland.WordPress.com/2012/12/27/Oracle-11-2-0-1-and-the-KFK-async-disk-IO-wait-event/

    http://www.UKOUG.org/what-we-offer/library/about-Multiblock-reads/about-Multiblock-reads.PDF

    Concerning

    Jonathan Lewis

  • DB file sequential read and read of the direct path

    Hello

    Could someone please clear my doubts about 'db file sequential read' and ' path direct reading. And help me understand the tkprof report correctly.
    Please suggest if my understanding for scenario below is correct.

    We have a 11.2.0.1 ' cluster 2 node rac version + asm' production and environment of his test environment that is a stand-alone database.
    The query performs well in production compared to the test database.
    The table is to have 254 + columns (264) with many lobs coulumns however LOB is not currently selected in the query.
    I read in metalink this 254 table + column a intra-line-chaining, causing "db file sequential read" full table Scan.

    Here are some details on the table which is similar to the prod and test, block size is 8 k:
    TABLE                             UNUSED BLOCKS     TOTAL BLOCKS  HIGH WATER MARK
    ------------------------------  ---------------  ---------------  ---------------
    PROBSUMMARYM1                               0          17408          17407
    What I understand less tkprof in production environment for a given session is:
    1 - the request resulted in disk 19378 readings and 145164 consistent readings.
    2 19378 disc bed, 2425 reads disc has given rise to the wait event 'db file sequential read'.
    This statement is correct this disc remaining readings were "db file sequential reads" but real quick so didn't wait event tied to it?
    3 - 183 'direct path read' there also. Is it because of the order by clause of the query?

    SQL ID: 72tvt5h4402c9
    Plan Hash: 1127048874
    select "NUMBER" num 
    from
     smprd.probsummarym1 where flag ='f' and affected_item = 'PAUSRWVP39486' 
      order by num asc
    
    
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    ------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------
    Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Fetch        1      0.53       4.88      19378     145164          0           0
    ------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------
    total        3      0.53       4.88      19378     145164          0           0
    
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: SYS
    
    Rows     Row Source Operation
    -------  ---------------------------------------------------
          0  SORT ORDER BY (cr=145164 pr=19378 pw=0 time=0 us cost=4411 size=24 card=2)
          0   TABLE ACCESS FULL PROBSUMMARYM1 (cr=145164 pr=19378 pw=0 time=0 us cost=4410 size=24 card=2)
    
    
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
      Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait  Total Waited
      ----------------------------------------   Waited  ----------  ------------
      SQL*Net message to client                       1        0.00          0.00
      ges message buffer allocation                   3        0.00          0.00
      enq: KO - fast object checkpoint                2        0.00          0.00
      reliable message                                1        0.00          0.00
      KJC: Wait for msg sends to complete             1        0.00          0.00
      Disk file operations I/O                        1        0.00          0.00
      kfk: async disk IO                            274        0.00          0.00
      direct path read                              183        0.01          0.72
      db file sequential read                      2425        0.05          3.71
      SQL*Net message from client                     1        2.45          2.45
    The same query when ran in no no rac - asm test stand alone database has given below tkprof.
    Does this mean that:
    1-here too, reads happen through "db file sequential read", but they were so fast that has failed to the wait event?
    2. "direct path read," it's because of the order clause in the query. "
    SQL ID: 72tvt5h4402c9
    Plan Hash: 1127048874
    select "NUMBER" num 
    from
     smprd.probsummarym1 where flag ='f' and affected_item = 'PAUSRWVP39486' 
      order by num asc
    
    
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    ------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------
    Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute      1      0.00       0.06          0          0          0           0
    Fetch        1      0.10       0.11      17154      17298          0           0
    ------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------
    total        3      0.10       0.18      17154      17298          0           0
    
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: SYS
    
    Rows     Row Source Operation
    -------  ---------------------------------------------------
          0  SORT ORDER BY (cr=17298 pr=17154 pw=0 time=0 us cost=4694 size=12 card=1)
          0   TABLE ACCESS FULL PROBSUMMARYM1 (cr=17298 pr=17154 pw=0 time=0 us cost=4693 size=12 card=1)
    
    
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
      Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait  Total Waited
      ----------------------------------------   Waited  ----------  ------------
      SQL*Net message to client                       1        0.00          0.00
      Disk file operations I/O                        1        0.00          0.00
      db file sequential read                         3        0.00          0.00
      direct path read                              149        0.00          0.03
      SQL*Net message from client                     1        2.29          2.29
    For trace files in the database Production and Test, I see that 'direct path read' is against the same data file that's stored table.
    Then how come 'this direct path read' because of the order by clause of the query and would have been in sort field size or pga?
    Or this direct path read extracts real PGA disk data, and "db file sequential read" do not extract data?
    I know, it's 'direct path read' is wait event when data are asked in PGA drive or what kind segment or temp tablespace is used.

    Here is the example of trace file in the Production database:
    *** 2013-01-04 13:49:15.109
    WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 11258483 driver id=1650815232 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=-1 tim=1357278555109496
    CLOSE #1:c=0,e=9,dep=0,type=1,tim=1357278555109622
    =====================
    PARSING IN CURSOR #1 len=113 dep=0 uid=0 oct=3 lid=0 tim=1357278555109766 hv=138414473 ad='cfc02ab8' sqlid='72tvt5h4402c9'
    select "NUMBER" num from smprd.probsummarym1 where flag ='f' and affected_item = 'PAUSRWVP39486' order by num asc
    END OF STMT
    PARSE #1:c=0,e=98,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=1,plh=1127048874,tim=1357278555109765
    EXEC #1:c=0,e=135,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=1,plh=1127048874,tim=1357278555109994
    WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 2 driver id=1650815232 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=-1 tim=1357278555110053
    WAIT #1: nam='ges message buffer allocation' ela= 3 pool=0 request=1 allocated=0 obj#=-1 tim=1357278555111630
    WAIT #1: nam='enq: KO - fast object checkpoint' ela= 370 name|mode=1263468550 2=65610 0=1 obj#=-1 tim=1357278555112098
    WAIT #1: nam='reliable message' ela= 1509 channel context=3691837552 channel handle=3724365720 broadcast message=3692890960 obj#=-1 tim=1357278555113975
    WAIT #1: nam='ges message buffer allocation' ela= 2 pool=0 request=1 allocated=0 obj#=-1 tim=1357278555114051
    WAIT #1: nam='enq: KO - fast object checkpoint' ela= 364 name|mode=1263468550 2=65610 0=1 obj#=-1 tim=1357278555114464
    WAIT #1: nam='KJC: Wait for msg sends to complete' ela= 9 msg=3686348728 dest|rcvr=65536 mtype=8 obj#=-1 tim=1357278555114516
    WAIT #1: nam='ges message buffer allocation' ela= 2 pool=0 request=1 allocated=0 obj#=-1 tim=1357278555114680
    WAIT #1: nam='Disk file operations I/O' ela= 562 FileOperation=2 fileno=6 filetype=2 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555115710
    WAIT #1: nam='kfk: async disk IO' ela= 5 count=1 intr=0 timeout=4294967295 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555117332
    
    *** 2013-01-04 13:49:15.123
    WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 6243 file number=6 first dba=11051 block cnt=5 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555123628
    WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 195 file#=6 block#=156863 blocks=1 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555123968
    WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 149 file#=6 block#=156804 blocks=1 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555124216
    WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 155 file#=6 block#=156816 blocks=1 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555124430
    WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 4826 file#=6 block#=156816 blocks=1 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555129317
    WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 987 file#=6 block#=156888 blocks=1 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555130427
    WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 3891 file#=6 block#=156888 blocks=1 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555134394
    WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 155 file#=6 block#=156912 blocks=1 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555134645
    WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 145 file#=6 block#=156920 blocks=1 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555134866
    WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 234 file#=6 block#=156898 blocks=1 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555135332
    WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 204 file#=6 block#=156907 blocks=1 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555135666
    WAIT #1: nam='kfk: async disk IO' ela= 4 count=1 intr=0 timeout=4294967295 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555135850
    WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 6894 file number=6 first dba=72073 block cnt=15 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555142774
    WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 4642 file#=6 block#=156840 blocks=1 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555147574
    WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 162 file#=6 block#=156853 blocks=1 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555147859
    WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 6469 file#=6 block#=156806 blocks=1 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555154407
    WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 182 file#=6 block#=156826 blocks=1 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555154660
    WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 147 file#=6 block#=156830 blocks=1 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555154873
    WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 145 file#=6 block#=156878 blocks=1 obj#=85520 tim=135727855515
    Here are the trace file for the test database:
    *** 2013-01-04 13:46:11.354
    WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 10384792 driver id=1650815232 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=-1 tim=1357278371354075
    CLOSE #1:c=0,e=3,dep=0,type=3,tim=1357278371354152
    =====================
    PARSING IN CURSOR #1 len=113 dep=0 uid=0 oct=3 lid=0 tim=1357278371363427 hv=138414473 ad='c7bd8d00' sqlid='72tvt5h4402c9'
    select "NUMBER" num from smprd.probsummarym1 where flag ='f' and affected_item = 'PAUSRWVP39486' order by num asc
    END OF STMT
    PARSE #1:c=0,e=9251,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=1,plh=1127048874,tim=1357278371363426
    EXEC #1:c=0,e=63178,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=1,plh=1127048874,tim=1357278371426691
    WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 2 driver id=1650815232 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=-1 tim=1357278371426766
    WAIT #1: nam='Disk file operations I/O' ela= 1133 FileOperation=2 fileno=55 filetype=2 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371428069
    WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 51 file#=55 block#=460234 blocks=1 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371428158
    WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 31 file number=55 first dba=460235 block cnt=5 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371428956
    WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 47 file number=55 first dba=136288 block cnt=8 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371429099
    WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 80 file number=55 first dba=136297 block cnt=15 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371438529
    WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 62 file number=55 first dba=136849 block cnt=15 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371438653
    WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 17 file number=55 first dba=136881 block cnt=7 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371438750
    WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 35 file number=55 first dba=136896 block cnt=8 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371438855
    WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 22 file number=55 first dba=136913 block cnt=7 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371438936
    WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 19 file number=55 first dba=137120 block cnt=8 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371439029
    WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 36 file number=55 first dba=137145 block cnt=7 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371439114
    WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 18 file number=55 first dba=137192 block cnt=8 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371439193
    WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 16 file number=55 first dba=137201 block cnt=7 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371439252
    WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 17 file number=55 first dba=137600 block cnt=8 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371439313
    WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 15 file number=55 first dba=137625 block cnt=7 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371439369
    WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 22 file number=55 first dba=137640 block cnt=8 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371439435
    WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 702 file number=55 first dba=801026 block cnt=126 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371440188
    WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 1511 file number=55 first dba=801154 block cnt=126 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371441763
    WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 263 file number=55 first dba=801282 block cnt=126 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371442547
    WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 259 file number=55 first dba=801410 block cnt=126 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371443315
    WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 294 file number=55 first dba=801538 block cnt=126 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371444099
    WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 247 file number=55 first dba=801666 block cnt=126 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371444843
    WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 266 file number=55 first dba=801794 block cnt=126 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371445619
    Thanks & Rgds,
    Vijay

    911786 wrote:

    Direct path readings can be done on the series tablescans in your version of Oracle, but if you have chained rows in the table and then Oracle can read read read the beginning of the line in the path directly, but must make a single block in the cache (the db file sequential read) to get the next part of the line.

    It is possible that your production system has a lot of chained rows, while your test system is not. As corroboration (though not convincing) indicator of what you might notice that if you take (reads disc - db file sequential reads) - who might get you close to all the blocks direct read - the numbers are very similar.

    I'm not 100% convinced that it's the answer for the difference in behavior, but worth a visit. If you can force and indexed access path in the table, do something like "select / * + index (use {pk}) * / max table (last_column_in_table)" and check the number of "table fetch continued lines" could be close to the number of db file sequential reads you. (There are other options for the counting of the chained rows that could be faster).

    Concerning
    Jonathan Lewis

  • The direct readings and parallel reading

    What is the difference between the direct and parallel reading?

    Direct read:
    http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E11882_01/server.112/e25513/waitevents003.htm#sthref3915
    http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E11882_01/server.112/e16638/instance_tune.htm#sthref726

    Db file parallel read:
    http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E11882_01/server.112/e25513/waitevents003.htm#sthref3901

  • VeriStand - reading A2L file

    Hello

    It is possible to directly read files A2L uses Veristand on "System Explorer-> material-> add NI - CAN-> Messages-> import NI-CAN Messages?

    I have seen that it is possible to do with .dbc or .ncd files, but we use the .a2l file.

    Any suggestion will be appreciated.

    I contacted Luciano with few options, he should get in touch with you soon.

    Take care

  • Strange thermocouple at the time reads high

    I have a problem my thermocouples to high playing time. I have a cRIO 9074 with a connected to 3 K type thermocouples 9211 thermocouple module. Thermocouples monitoring 3 heat zones from a giant furnace, in which areas can be activated and deactivated with the help of a relay. When activated, the thermocouples read the temperature normally up to 800 ° C. However, when it goes beyond 800 degrees, it can seem to read normally, but when you place radiator different relay on or off, the thermocouple reading significantly changes a few times. This does not happen below 800 C see attached photos and assume that the first photo is the right base temperature:

    When I joined the first box to an external drive thermocouple with its own digital screen, I don't see this radical change when switching of the relay on and outside. It has remained relatively constant.

    Why I see such a big change with the 9211 module? I'm not process the signal somehow, just a direct reading, and the module itself is configured to play the K type thermocouples. The heater contactor and thermocouples are relatively far.

    Any help is appreciated.

    Linus

    Hi Craig,.

    Yes, I could solve this problem. a LabVIEW engineer suggested this solution and it worked. See Section 3 (Nonreferenced) floating measurement of Sources at this link:

    http://www.NI.com/white-paper/3344/en/#toc3


    The source of the problem was instrumentation amplifier input bias currents, causing the voltage level of the floating source to be moved out of reach. I need to add polarization resistors to provide a path of DC since the instrumentation amplifier inputs to the instrumentation amplifier ground and anchor this voltage level at a few references. I followed resistors in FIgure 10 and added two 100 kOhm for each of my thermocouples. Since then, I have much more fluctuating readings.

    Hope this helps,

    Linus

  • read the output of a path of analog output current voltage

    In DAQmx if you are unsure of the status of a digital output port, you can take a reading on this subject.  When I try this on an analog output, I get an error.  Is it possible to query the status of the output of an analog output?  I realize that I could follow the State with a variable, but a direct reading would be really handy.

    Hello, GIS.

    There is no way to read the output in the AO modules without wiring physically the signal to a module to HAVE.  You are able to use a variable to read the current value of the output, as you mentioned earlier.

    Channels AO multifunction boards, however, can be read through tasks of entry by rounting in-house channel to read ao vs aoground.

    Lisa

  • ArcGIS reads georaster data?

    Hello world

    Does anyone know the ArcGIS support or not to read georaster data? If take charge, how to use ArcObject to read georaster data?

    Best regards

    Ylin

    Hi Ylin,

    By ESRI, ArcGIS 9.2 and later versions are supported direct read and write of GeoRaster. "In a DBMS Oracle ArcSDE Geodatabases store raster data in the types of storage or LONG RAW, BLOB or GeoRaster." Please check ArcGIS/ArcObject manuals to obtain technical information.

    Best regards

    Jeffrey Xie

  • Amazing grace! LGWR is READING!

    Oracle 11g has a table called V$ IOFUNCMETRIC, which is a feature
    table of metrics, as the game that has been introduced in 10g. What confuses
    There are 2 things to me:
    (1) SQL > select function_name from V$ IOFUNCMETRIC;

    FUNCTION_NAME
    ------------------
    Recovery
    Direct writing
    Smart Scan
    Others
    ARCH
    DBWR
    XDB
    Streams AQ
    Buffer Cache reads
    Direct readings
    Data pump
    LGWR
    RMAN

    13 selected lines.

    What the devil is "smart scan"? It is neither a cache buffers read or
    a direct read since the two functions are defined separately.

    (2) 1 Select SMALL_READ_MBPS, SMALL_READ_IOPS
    2 from V$ IOFUNCMETRIC
    3 * where FUNCTION_NAME = 'LGWR.
    SQL > /.


    SMALL_READ_MBPS SMALL_READ_IOPS
    --------------- ---------------
    1.83150183.016650017

    Elapsed time: 00:00:00.05


    LGWR is READING? What is reading newspaper writer? Newspaper editor isn't supposed to
    read whatever it is. Why LGWR do readings? I think it is cheating. Does anyone have any explanation for what is reading LGWR?
    Explanation of Kevin Closson to this article http://tinyurl.com/yr37pw
    obviously does not cover this case.

    --
    Mladen Gogala
    http://mgogala.freehostia.com

    Kandi Sissi wrote:

    Satish, always the question of the "smart scan"?

    :-( I haven't found something in this regard. It seems to be undocumented (or my search is not developed).

    I guess the "smart scan" refers to new technology "Exadata" that allows to perform a so-called "smart scan" which means that the storage system for example performs a full table scan to the server only returns the rows and columns that meet the criteria of filter/projection, the subsystem of storage rather than brute force simply transfer all the blocks from the table.

    Kind regards
    Randolf

    Oracle related blog stuff:
    http://Oracle-Randolf.blogspot.com/

    SQLTools ++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
    http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676 /.
    http://sourceforge.NET/projects/SQLT-pp/

  • How to display an e-mail message when the message is in HTML?

    Sometimes I get emails whose messages are in HTML format.
    They are unreadable, unless I have save outside of thunderbird as files with the extension .html and open them in firefox.
    Is there a less cumbersome way to directly read in thunderbird itself?

    Linux Mint Debian Edition

    View - body of the Message as - HTML Original

  • I want to download Pod Casts, can someone help me?

    like many others, I couldn't save pod-casts, they simply open and start playing. I tried a long click and right-click on the link, there is no option "Save." I put all the options of MP3 tools to "always ask", no luck there more (I also tried 'save'). In the remarks. config page I changed the media.windows - media - foundation.enabled. 'false', he stopped the play of pod-cast, but has not helped to save or download. I use a windows PC that I'm be more tempted to hit with something big and heavy so any help or new suggestions would be very appreciated

    Moderator edited the title of this thread

    Hello, 21 firefox now uses the codecs that are included in your operating system that allow him to directly read mp3 and mpeg (also for html5 videos). in order to disable that, enter about: config in the address bar of firefox (confirmed the message information where it appears) and search for the preference named media.windows - media - foundation.enabled. Double-click it and change its value to false.

    Another way to download files without tweaking the above-mentioned preference would be to click right on the link that leads to an mp3 file or right click on the drive in firefox and choose to download the file like that...

Maybe you are looking for