"path direct reading temp '-P1

Hello!

One of my active sessions waiting 'the direct path read temp' event.
Average P1 number settings file and at the same time why this grater number as:
select max(file#) from v$ datafile;
I'm usung 10.2.0.5

Thank you and best regards,
Pavel

The file referenced in the direct path read temp"wait event is a temporary file.
EEG, the number of file to a temporary file, you need to subtract the number P1 file db max.
You can get the maximum number of db files with
{code}
Select the value of the parameter $ v where name = 'db_files '.
{code}
After getting the file number of the temporary file, you must look at v$ tempfile for further details.

Lordane Iotzov
http://iiotzov.WordPress.com/

Tags: Database

Similar Questions

  • Insert adds parallel sessions expect "direct path read temp".

    Hi all.

    The database is 11.2.0.3 on a linux machine.

    I published the following query, and I found that parallel query sessions were waiting for "direct path read temp.

    And SDPCSM. Table SDP_CHILD_SVC_PROFATTR_HIS does NOT index and is in nologging mode.

    Why the pq sessions expect "direct path read/write temp?
    insert /*+ append parallel (8) */ into SDPCSM.SDP_CHILD_SVC_PROFATTR_HIS
select /*+ parallel (SDP_CHILD_SVC_PROFATTR_HIS_E, 8) */ * from SDPCSM.SDP_CHILD_SVC_PROFATTR_HIS_E@tb_link;
    Thanks in advance.
    Best regards.

    Please check this blog:
    http://www.Confio.com/blog/Oracle-wait-event-explained-direct-path-read-temp

  • My direct read anchor point selection tool and the handle when on these points, but is now box or anything. How do I change back.

    My direct read anchor point selection tool and the handle when on these points, but is now box or anything. How do I change back.

    Turn on view > Smart guides.

  • Paths of reading via the Config Ini file

    I was curious to know how one send or read from a configuration (.ini) file paths in LabVIEW. Any help is appreciated especially examples

    It's actually pretty simple...

  • force direct read instead of memory

    Hello

    is it possible via a tip or something to force oracle does not put blocks of a sql for the buffer cache and read directly to disk every time? That's a test question.

    Thank you all

    He has hidden parameter serialdirect_read.
    The allowed values depend on the version:
    before 11R2 - true or false
    11R2 - true/false/always/never/auto

    alter session set "_serial_direct_read"=true

    It works in any version > = 8i.

  • I'm new windows xp installen ask me for service pack 2 I'm uncertain the cd in the drive but always ask the path the reader

    I change the hard drive and xp OS reisntal then ask me for the service pack 2 cd I have uncertain the cd in the drive but ask me for path were the file s thank you

    If the version of Windows XP SP1a, then consider installing Service Pack 3 (including SP2).

    Windows SP2 download (WindowsXP-KB835935-SP2 - ENU.exe)
    http://www.Microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=049c9dbe-3b8e-4F30-8245-9e368d3cdb5a&DisplayLang=en

    Learn how to install Windows XP Service Pack 3 (SP3)
    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/help/learn-how-to-install-Windows-XP-Service-Pack-3-SP3

    J W Stuart: http://www.pagestart.com

  • No direct reading.

    Dell Inspiron 1501

    Windows XP Media Center Edition

    SP2

    I never had this work and just decided I would try it out. I read that Dell provided their laptops with live monitoring power off. I tried the regedit and am sure I did it right. I then restart my computer, and when I go to the part where we can read:

    "2. in the Options menu, select Properties.

    3. under "Show the following volume controls" check the input monitor. Click OK. »

    I do not end up see entry monitor... so I can't check.

    I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. My audio works fine. I can record and then play again. I don't know that this is not just cut in the Volume controls.

    Thank you and I would be very grateful if you can solve this problem. Let me know if you need more info.

    Message edited by jonny01 on 14/06/2008 10:39

  • DB file sequential read and read of the direct path

    Hello

    Could someone please clear my doubts about 'db file sequential read' and ' path direct reading. And help me understand the tkprof report correctly.
    Please suggest if my understanding for scenario below is correct.

    We have a 11.2.0.1 ' cluster 2 node rac version + asm' production and environment of his test environment that is a stand-alone database.
    The query performs well in production compared to the test database.
    The table is to have 254 + columns (264) with many lobs coulumns however LOB is not currently selected in the query.
    I read in metalink this 254 table + column a intra-line-chaining, causing "db file sequential read" full table Scan.

    Here are some details on the table which is similar to the prod and test, block size is 8 k:
    TABLE                             UNUSED BLOCKS     TOTAL BLOCKS  HIGH WATER MARK
------------------------------  ---------------  ---------------  ---------------
PROBSUMMARYM1                               0          17408          17407
    What I understand less tkprof in production environment for a given session is:
    1 - the request resulted in disk 19378 readings and 145164 consistent readings.
    2 19378 disc bed, 2425 reads disc has given rise to the wait event 'db file sequential read'.
    This statement is correct this disc remaining readings were "db file sequential reads" but real quick so didn't wait event tied to it?
    3 - 183 'direct path read' there also. Is it because of the order by clause of the query?

    SQL ID: 72tvt5h4402c9
Plan Hash: 1127048874
select "NUMBER" num 
from
 smprd.probsummarym1 where flag ='f' and affected_item = 'PAUSRWVP39486' 
  order by num asc


call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------
Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Fetch        1      0.53       4.88      19378     145164          0           0
------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------
total        3      0.53       4.88      19378     145164          0           0

Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: SYS

Rows     Row Source Operation
-------  ---------------------------------------------------
      0  SORT ORDER BY (cr=145164 pr=19378 pw=0 time=0 us cost=4411 size=24 card=2)
      0   TABLE ACCESS FULL PROBSUMMARYM1 (cr=145164 pr=19378 pw=0 time=0 us cost=4410 size=24 card=2)


Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
  Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait  Total Waited
  ----------------------------------------   Waited  ----------  ------------
  SQL*Net message to client                       1        0.00          0.00
  ges message buffer allocation                   3        0.00          0.00
  enq: KO - fast object checkpoint                2        0.00          0.00
  reliable message                                1        0.00          0.00
  KJC: Wait for msg sends to complete             1        0.00          0.00
  Disk file operations I/O                        1        0.00          0.00
  kfk: async disk IO                            274        0.00          0.00
  direct path read                              183        0.01          0.72
  db file sequential read                      2425        0.05          3.71
  SQL*Net message from client                     1        2.45          2.45
    The same query when ran in no no rac - asm test stand alone database has given below tkprof.
    Does this mean that:
    1-here too, reads happen through "db file sequential read", but they were so fast that has failed to the wait event?
    2. "direct path read," it's because of the order clause in the query. "
    SQL ID: 72tvt5h4402c9
Plan Hash: 1127048874
select "NUMBER" num 
from
 smprd.probsummarym1 where flag ='f' and affected_item = 'PAUSRWVP39486' 
  order by num asc


call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------
Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.06          0          0          0           0
Fetch        1      0.10       0.11      17154      17298          0           0
------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------
total        3      0.10       0.18      17154      17298          0           0

Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: SYS

Rows     Row Source Operation
-------  ---------------------------------------------------
      0  SORT ORDER BY (cr=17298 pr=17154 pw=0 time=0 us cost=4694 size=12 card=1)
      0   TABLE ACCESS FULL PROBSUMMARYM1 (cr=17298 pr=17154 pw=0 time=0 us cost=4693 size=12 card=1)


Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
  Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait  Total Waited
  ----------------------------------------   Waited  ----------  ------------
  SQL*Net message to client                       1        0.00          0.00
  Disk file operations I/O                        1        0.00          0.00
  db file sequential read                         3        0.00          0.00
  direct path read                              149        0.00          0.03
  SQL*Net message from client                     1        2.29          2.29
    For trace files in the database Production and Test, I see that 'direct path read' is against the same data file that's stored table.
    Then how come 'this direct path read' because of the order by clause of the query and would have been in sort field size or pga?
    Or this direct path read extracts real PGA disk data, and "db file sequential read" do not extract data?
    I know, it's 'direct path read' is wait event when data are asked in PGA drive or what kind segment or temp tablespace is used.

    Here is the example of trace file in the Production database:
    *** 2013-01-04 13:49:15.109
WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 11258483 driver id=1650815232 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=-1 tim=1357278555109496
CLOSE #1:c=0,e=9,dep=0,type=1,tim=1357278555109622
=====================
PARSING IN CURSOR #1 len=113 dep=0 uid=0 oct=3 lid=0 tim=1357278555109766 hv=138414473 ad='cfc02ab8' sqlid='72tvt5h4402c9'
select "NUMBER" num from smprd.probsummarym1 where flag ='f' and affected_item = 'PAUSRWVP39486' order by num asc
END OF STMT
PARSE #1:c=0,e=98,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=1,plh=1127048874,tim=1357278555109765
EXEC #1:c=0,e=135,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=1,plh=1127048874,tim=1357278555109994
WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 2 driver id=1650815232 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=-1 tim=1357278555110053
WAIT #1: nam='ges message buffer allocation' ela= 3 pool=0 request=1 allocated=0 obj#=-1 tim=1357278555111630
WAIT #1: nam='enq: KO - fast object checkpoint' ela= 370 name|mode=1263468550 2=65610 0=1 obj#=-1 tim=1357278555112098
WAIT #1: nam='reliable message' ela= 1509 channel context=3691837552 channel handle=3724365720 broadcast message=3692890960 obj#=-1 tim=1357278555113975
WAIT #1: nam='ges message buffer allocation' ela= 2 pool=0 request=1 allocated=0 obj#=-1 tim=1357278555114051
WAIT #1: nam='enq: KO - fast object checkpoint' ela= 364 name|mode=1263468550 2=65610 0=1 obj#=-1 tim=1357278555114464
WAIT #1: nam='KJC: Wait for msg sends to complete' ela= 9 msg=3686348728 dest|rcvr=65536 mtype=8 obj#=-1 tim=1357278555114516
WAIT #1: nam='ges message buffer allocation' ela= 2 pool=0 request=1 allocated=0 obj#=-1 tim=1357278555114680
WAIT #1: nam='Disk file operations I/O' ela= 562 FileOperation=2 fileno=6 filetype=2 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555115710
WAIT #1: nam='kfk: async disk IO' ela= 5 count=1 intr=0 timeout=4294967295 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555117332

*** 2013-01-04 13:49:15.123
WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 6243 file number=6 first dba=11051 block cnt=5 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555123628
WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 195 file#=6 block#=156863 blocks=1 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555123968
WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 149 file#=6 block#=156804 blocks=1 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555124216
WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 155 file#=6 block#=156816 blocks=1 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555124430
WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 4826 file#=6 block#=156816 blocks=1 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555129317
WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 987 file#=6 block#=156888 blocks=1 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555130427
WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 3891 file#=6 block#=156888 blocks=1 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555134394
WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 155 file#=6 block#=156912 blocks=1 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555134645
WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 145 file#=6 block#=156920 blocks=1 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555134866
WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 234 file#=6 block#=156898 blocks=1 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555135332
WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 204 file#=6 block#=156907 blocks=1 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555135666
WAIT #1: nam='kfk: async disk IO' ela= 4 count=1 intr=0 timeout=4294967295 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555135850
WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 6894 file number=6 first dba=72073 block cnt=15 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555142774
WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 4642 file#=6 block#=156840 blocks=1 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555147574
WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 162 file#=6 block#=156853 blocks=1 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555147859
WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 6469 file#=6 block#=156806 blocks=1 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555154407
WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 182 file#=6 block#=156826 blocks=1 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555154660
WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 147 file#=6 block#=156830 blocks=1 obj#=85520 tim=1357278555154873
WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 145 file#=6 block#=156878 blocks=1 obj#=85520 tim=135727855515
    Here are the trace file for the test database:
    *** 2013-01-04 13:46:11.354
WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 10384792 driver id=1650815232 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=-1 tim=1357278371354075
CLOSE #1:c=0,e=3,dep=0,type=3,tim=1357278371354152
=====================
PARSING IN CURSOR #1 len=113 dep=0 uid=0 oct=3 lid=0 tim=1357278371363427 hv=138414473 ad='c7bd8d00' sqlid='72tvt5h4402c9'
select "NUMBER" num from smprd.probsummarym1 where flag ='f' and affected_item = 'PAUSRWVP39486' order by num asc
END OF STMT
PARSE #1:c=0,e=9251,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=1,plh=1127048874,tim=1357278371363426
EXEC #1:c=0,e=63178,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=1,plh=1127048874,tim=1357278371426691
WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 2 driver id=1650815232 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=-1 tim=1357278371426766
WAIT #1: nam='Disk file operations I/O' ela= 1133 FileOperation=2 fileno=55 filetype=2 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371428069
WAIT #1: nam='db file sequential read' ela= 51 file#=55 block#=460234 blocks=1 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371428158
WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 31 file number=55 first dba=460235 block cnt=5 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371428956
WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 47 file number=55 first dba=136288 block cnt=8 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371429099
WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 80 file number=55 first dba=136297 block cnt=15 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371438529
WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 62 file number=55 first dba=136849 block cnt=15 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371438653
WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 17 file number=55 first dba=136881 block cnt=7 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371438750
WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 35 file number=55 first dba=136896 block cnt=8 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371438855
WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 22 file number=55 first dba=136913 block cnt=7 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371438936
WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 19 file number=55 first dba=137120 block cnt=8 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371439029
WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 36 file number=55 first dba=137145 block cnt=7 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371439114
WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 18 file number=55 first dba=137192 block cnt=8 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371439193
WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 16 file number=55 first dba=137201 block cnt=7 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371439252
WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 17 file number=55 first dba=137600 block cnt=8 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371439313
WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 15 file number=55 first dba=137625 block cnt=7 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371439369
WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 22 file number=55 first dba=137640 block cnt=8 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371439435
WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 702 file number=55 first dba=801026 block cnt=126 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371440188
WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 1511 file number=55 first dba=801154 block cnt=126 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371441763
WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 263 file number=55 first dba=801282 block cnt=126 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371442547
WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 259 file number=55 first dba=801410 block cnt=126 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371443315
WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 294 file number=55 first dba=801538 block cnt=126 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371444099
WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 247 file number=55 first dba=801666 block cnt=126 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371444843
WAIT #1: nam='direct path read' ela= 266 file number=55 first dba=801794 block cnt=126 obj#=93574 tim=1357278371445619
    Thanks & Rgds,
    Vijay

    911786 wrote:

    Direct path readings can be done on the series tablescans in your version of Oracle, but if you have chained rows in the table and then Oracle can read read read the beginning of the line in the path directly, but must make a single block in the cache (the db file sequential read) to get the next part of the line.

    It is possible that your production system has a lot of chained rows, while your test system is not. As corroboration (though not convincing) indicator of what you might notice that if you take (reads disc - db file sequential reads) - who might get you close to all the blocks direct read - the numbers are very similar.

    I'm not 100% convinced that it's the answer for the difference in behavior, but worth a visit. If you can force and indexed access path in the table, do something like "select / * + index (use {pk}) * / max table (last_column_in_table)" and check the number of "table fetch continued lines" could be close to the number of db file sequential reads you. (There are other options for the counting of the chained rows that could be faster).

    Concerning
    Jonathan Lewis

  • Insert into... How to do it with a big enough request?

    Hello

    I want to store the result of this query in a table:

    insert into dbsnmp.zetup_iostat (seq_ms, seq_ct, lfpw_ms, lfpw_ct, scat_ms, scat_ct, dpr_ms, dpr_ct, dprt_ms, dprt_ct, prevseq_ct, prevscat_ct, prevseq_tm, prevscat_tm, prevsec, prevlfpw_tm, prevlfpw_ct, prevdpr_ct, prevdpr_tm, prevdprt_ct, prevdprt_tm, prevdpw_ct, prevdpw_tm

    prevdpwt_ct, prevdpwt_tm) values (seq_ms, seq_ct, lfpw_ms, lfpw_ct, scat_ms, scat_ct, dpr_ms, dpr_ct, dprt_ms, dprt_ct, prevseq_ct, prevscat_ct, prevseq_tm, prevscat_tm, prevsec, prevlfpw_tm, prevlfpw_ct, prevdpr_ct, prevdpr_tm, prevdprt_ct, prevdprt_tm, prevdpw_ct, prevdpw_tm

    prevdpwt_ct, prevdpwt_tm)

    Select

    Round (seqtm/NULLIF(seqct,0), 2) seq_ms.

    Round (seqct/NULLIF(Delta,0), 2) seq_ct.

    Round (lfpwtm/NULLIF(lfpwct,0), 2) lfpw_ms.

    Round (lfpwct/NULLIF(Delta,0), 2) lfpw_ct.

    Round (scattm/NULLIF(scatct,0), 2) scat_ms.

    Round (scatct/NULLIF(Delta,0), 0) scat_ct,

    Round (dprtm/NULLIF(dprct,0), 2) dpr_ms.

    Round (dprct/NULLIF(Delta,0), 2) dpr_ct.

    Round (dprttm/NULLIF(dprtct,0), 2) dprt_ms.

    Round (dprtct/NULLIF(Delta,0), 2) dprt_ct.

    prevseq_ct, prevscat_ct, prevseq_tm, prevscat_tm, prevsec, prevlfpw_tm, prevlfpw_ct

    prevdpr_ct, prevdpr_tm, prevdprt_ct, prevdprt_tm, prevdpw_ct, prevdpw_tm

    prevdpwt_ct, prevdpwt_tm

    Of

    (select

    sum (decode (event, 'db file sequential read', round(time_waited_micro/1000) - & prevseq_tm_var, 0)) seqtm,.

    sum (decode (event, "db-reading of scattered files", round(time_waited_micro/1000) - & prevscat_tm_var, 0)) scattm,.

    sum (decode (event, 'parallel writing to log file', round(time_waited_micro/1000) - & prevlfpw_tm_var, 0)) lfpwtm,.

    sum (decode (event, 'db file sequential read', round(time_waited_micro/1000), 0)) prevseq_tm,.

    sum (decode ("db-reading of scattered files", event, round(time_waited_micro/1000), 0)) prevscat_tm,.

    sum (decode (event, 'parallel writing to log file', round(time_waited_micro/1000), 0)) prevlfpw_tm,.

    sum (decode (event, 'db file sequential read', total_waits - & prevseq_ct_var, 0)) seqct,.

    sum (decode (event, "db-reading of scattered files", total_waits - & prevscat_ct_var, 0)) scatct,.

    sum (decode (event, 'parallel writing to log file', total_waits - & prevlfpw_ct_var, 0)) lfpwct,.

    sum (decode (event, 'db file sequential read', total_waits, 0)) prevseq_ct,.

    sum (decode ("db-reading of scattered files", event, total_waits, 0)) prevscat_ct,.

    sum (decode (event, 'parallel writing to log file', total_waits, 0)) prevlfpw_ct,.

    sum (decode (event, 'direct path read', round(time_waited_micro/1000) - & prevdpr_tm_var, 0)) dprtm,.

    sum (decode ('direct path read', event, round(time_waited_micro/1000), 0)) prevdpr_tm,.

    sum (decode (event, 'direct path read', total_waits - & prevdpr_ct_var, 0)) dprct,.

    sum (decode ('direct path read', event, total_waits, 0)) prevdpr_ct,.

    sum (decode (event, 'Write direct path', round(time_waited_micro/1000) - & prevdpw_tm_var, 0)) dpwtm,.

    sum (decode (event, 'Write direct path', round(time_waited_micro/1000), 0)) prevdpw_tm,.

    sum (decode (event, 'Write direct path', total_waits - & prevdpw_ct_var, 0)) dpwct,.

    sum (decode (event, 'Write direct path', total_waits, 0)) prevdpw_ct,.

    sum (decode (event, ' path direct writing temp', round(time_waited_micro/1000) - & prevdpwt_tm_var, 0)) dpwttm,.

    sum (decode (' path direct writing temp', event, round(time_waited_micro/1000), 0)) prevdpwt_tm,.

    sum (decode (event, ' path direct writing temp', total_waits - & prevdpwt_ct_var, 0)) dpwtct,.

    sum (decode (' path direct writing temp', event, total_waits, 0)) prevdpwt_ct,.

    sum (decode (event, 'the direct path read temp', round(time_waited_micro/1000) - & prevdprt_tm_var, 0)) dprttm,.

    sum (decode (event, "the direct path read temp", round(time_waited_micro/1000), 0)) prevdprt_tm,.

    sum (decode (event, 'the direct path read temp', total_waits - & prevdprt_ct_var, 0)) dprtct,.

    sum (decode (event, "the direct path read temp", total_waits, 0)) prevdprt_ct,.

    Delta to_char (sysdate, 'SSSSS') - & prevsec_var,

    to_char(sysdate,'SSSSS') prevsec

    Of

    v$ system_event

    where

    test of ('db file sequential read',

    "scattered files db reading."

    "direct way read temp."

    "direct path write temp."

    "direct path read."

    "Write direct way."

    "log file parallel write")

    ) ;

    create table iostat_table)

    number of seq_ms

    number of seq_ct

    number of lfpw_ms

    number of lfpw_ct

    number of scat_ms

    number of scat_ct

    number of dpr_ms

    number of dpr_ct

    number of dprt_ms

    number of dprt_ct

    number of prevseq_ct

    number of prevscat_ct

    number of prevseq_tm

    number of prevscat_tm

    number of prevsec

    number of prevlfpw_tm

    number of prevlfpw_ct

    number of prevdpr_ct

    number of prevdpr_tm

    number of prevdprt_ct

    number of prevdprt_tm

    number of prevdpw_ct

    number of prevdpw_tm

    number of prevdpwt_ct

    number of prevdpwt_tm

    );

    I get

    ERROR on line 4:

    ORA-00933: SQL not correctly completed command.

    When you run the query.

    How well do things?

    Concerning

    3

    Delete 'values' of the insert bit.

    insert into iostat_table...

    Select

  • Direct path read event

    Hi all

    We use 10.2.0.3 on sparc solaris 10 64 bit OS.

    I wondered about two events in my environment that will take a long time. Yes, we do a lot of grouping, sorting and hash joins that temp on spill data.

    For the most part, all time will "lead the read temp path. I took route and seen it's just 1 block reading all time (p3) vs other reads like scattered or direct path write 32 blocks read/write.
      direct path read temp                      241389        4.19       2511.08
  direct path write                               2        0.00          0.00
    So, is there a reason why the direct path read temp to read than a single block at the time? Can we define something that can read multiple blocks in an extraction

    Nico wrote:
    Thank you Greg for more information.

    Have you found any workaround to 10.2.0.3

    It is not a work around. The changes in the fixed a bug how temp blocks are read for positional kinds. It should all but remove the one-piece temp readings. Much more effective with this fix. I saw about 2 x increase in performance in many cases actual test using this hotfix.

    You can try and see if Oracle Support will backport of 10.2.0.3, but I recommend you do 10.2.0.4 anyway due to the considerable number of bug fixes. It won't take long and 10.2.0.5 comes out as well.

    --
    Kind regards
    Greg Rahn
    http://structureddata.org

  • Is it reasonable to require a Full table Scan (Direct path read) on a large Table

    Hello

    I have an Oracle 11.2.0.3 on a Sun Solaris 10 sparc with SGA 25 GB machine

    One of my made SQL an analysis of indexes on the table to 45 GB where the size of the index is 14FR and the thourghput for the sequential read is 2MBPS.

    so now (Index) 14 000 Mo, 14 GB / 2 MB = dry 7000 = 2 hours to scan the index.

    Flow of the direct path read is 500 Mbps for an another SQL and reads assimilate them all live.

    and because of this flow, a read (FTS) of direct path on the table of 7 GB out in 12-13 seconds. So in my case, it probably takes 100 seconds to scan the entire table. It is a monthly report and does not often.

    Should I try to use a trick to force sql to do a full scan and exploit the possibilities of direct reading and is done in a few minutes? Assuming it to do a FTS (direct play)

    Of course, it will be tested and verified, but the question is, is this a sensible apprioach? is - anyone has experience by forcing it?

    Any suggestions would be helpful... I'll test this on a different machine tomorrow.

    Best regards

    Maran

    82million lines and a grouping of 18million factor?  And really 17million from lines to recover?  However, your result set after the hash join is 3500 lines, although the optimizer expects 16 lines.

    I would say that the statistics are not representative or not in use for this SQL.  Certainly, the index does not match query predicates.

    The fact that the index is also using the virtual columns only adds to confusion.

    Hemant K Collette

  • With regard to 'Direct Path read' expected

    As we know, the direct path read waits is a new feature of Oracle 11 g. Oracle Documents or other objects, when it's the full table scan, direct path reading took place. But why it happened?  I don't know clearly.

    Here is the description of the Oracle Document:

    http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E18283_01/server.112/e17110/waitevents003.htm#sthref3849

    During operations of Direct Reading of data asynchronously access path in the database files. At some point, the session must ensure that all the asynchronous i/o in circulation have been realized on the drive. This can also happen if during a direct reading without more slots is available for storing exceptional load requests (a charge application might consist of several e/s).


    Question:

    1 during operations of Direct data asynchronously reading path in database files.  > > this statement means what? What of "asynchronous reading '?

    2 describe above description for me in details.

    3. who can clearly explain "why read direct path wait to happen ' for me?


    Thanks in advance.

    Lonion


    Lonion wrote:

    Question:

    1. to path operations Direct playback of data asynchronously in the database files.  > This statement means what? What of "asynchronous reading '?

    2 describe above description for me in details.

    3. who can clearly explain "why read direct path wait to happen ' for me?

    If you want to get very technical, Frits Hoogland wrote a lot about the implementation:

    http://fritshoogland.WordPress.com/2013/05/09/direct-path-read-and-fast-full-index-scans/

    http://fritshoogland.WordPress.com/2013/01/04/Oracle-11-2-and-the-direct-path-read-event/

    http://fritshoogland.WordPress.com/2012/12/27/Oracle-11-2-0-1-and-the-KFK-async-disk-IO-wait-event/

    http://www.UKOUG.org/what-we-offer/library/about-Multiblock-reads/about-Multiblock-reads.PDF

    Concerning

    Jonathan Lewis

  • read the output of a path of analog output current voltage

    In DAQmx if you are unsure of the status of a digital output port, you can take a reading on this subject.  When I try this on an analog output, I get an error.  Is it possible to query the status of the output of an analog output?  I realize that I could follow the State with a variable, but a direct reading would be really handy.

    Hello, GIS.

    There is no way to read the output in the AO modules without wiring physically the signal to a module to HAVE.  You are able to use a variable to read the current value of the output, as you mentioned earlier.

    Channels AO multifunction boards, however, can be read through tasks of entry by rounting in-house channel to read ao vs aoground.

    Lisa

  • The direct readings and parallel reading

    What is the difference between the direct and parallel reading?

    Direct read:
    http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E11882_01/server.112/e25513/waitevents003.htm#sthref3915
    http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E11882_01/server.112/e16638/instance_tune.htm#sthref726

    Db file parallel read:
    http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E11882_01/server.112/e25513/waitevents003.htm#sthref3901

  • Reverse the direction of the pasted path?

    I have a path on a shape layer and I copy this path in the Position of another layer (so I can animate this layer along the way).

    But I need the inversion that moves the stuck position.

    So I need instead of the movement object to the right, left right left.

    I tried to change the setting of 'Reverse Path Direction' on the path before copy/paste, but who don't seem to do anything.

    CC OF 2015

    Choose all keys > right click > keyframe assistant > time-reverse keyframe

Maybe you are looking for