normal priority for the priority producer consumer

Similar Questions

• Why, abroad, I am normally charged for the Icloud, but I don't have access to the download items from my Itunes library?

  I am Brazilian, I'm out of Brazil to hold a doctorate in Paris, and he was denied access to an album of my library.

  I don't think that being outside the Brazil I can't download it, because it's the same MAC and the same APPLE ID. I know that before international property laws, denial of access to the files I already bought is called restriction and severe restriction of the rights of the customer, especially because my stay here - through the eyes of the law - can not be considered a change of nationality, and move my personal equipment can not be seen as the import / export , and for my files private use does not violate the Agreement agreed to purchase access. More, I'm being cherged for my icloud, even in Paris! So, why is it "for me" there is no problem, but "using my library of purshased' is denied?

  The message I get is:

  The song "Me, Myself and I" could not be used because he did not find the original file. You want to locate?

  What is the procedure to download my library paid itens againg?

  Tnks!

  The song "Me, Myself and I" could not be used because he did not find the original file. You want to locate?

  This means that you have deleted, renamed, or moved this file of music on this computer. You have searched your computer and checked the garbage?

  What is the procedure to download my library paid itens againg?

  When you are in Brazil you can redownload your Brazilian store bought (assuming they remain in the Brazilian store). If you can't find them on your computer, you have them on a backup of your library of downloads or Time Machine that you have with you?

  I don't think that being outside the Brazil I can't download it, because it's the same MAC and the same APPLE ID. I know that before the international laws of property, denial of access to the files I already bought is called restriction and severe restriction of the rights of the customer, in particular because my stay here - through the eyes of the law - can not be considered a change of nationality,

  You have accepted the terms of the Brazilian store when creating the account that you wouldn't use Brazilian store when in the Brazil. Nationality has nothing to do with it, it's the country that you are physically in what is relevant.

• BlackBerry smartphones is this normal appearance for the Trackpad?

  I just got a replacement from AT & T torch and have noticed that the trackpad has drawn on it (see below).  My previous torch was not successful in such model.  One of the other torch has the same?  Thank you.

  

  I just got the phone with AT & T warranty service. They helped me to determine that this is just a decorative sticker.

• producer consumer loop run only once?

  Hello here

  In my VI, the loop of the producer seems to operate continuously, but the loop of consumer only run once.

  I did not use producer/consumer patterns before, could someone give me some ideas why this is happening?

  My code is attached.

  Thank you in advance.

  Faouzi

  It would be the wrong choice to use a structure of the event into the loop of the consumer.  As it is configured, you must generate a leave mouse or mouse event enter on the graph of waveform for the loop of consumer to complete its first iteration.

  Remove the structure of the event.  you don't need to update a chart.

• VISA SERIES termination character producer consumer model

  Hello

  I'm developing a HMI to receive data from a sensor.
  Material sensor is built in my company and I have no flexibility with her. Only 2 RX & GND wires, no possibility of
  hardware handshake.

  The sensor send to an RS232 com port a string hex each 1 s, 10 s, 60 years or more and I can not know the frequency.
  So, I scan each data bytes to the serial port and serial port with VISA Read 20ms. At the end of the string hex sent by the sensor
  There is a stop character but I don't how to use it.

  I use the model producer/consumer do not lose any data.

  In fact, I read and concatain received data (with VISA READ) until I got the right number of bytes (because I know the size of)
  the sent hexastring is 495 bytes).
  But in the real work, I don't know the size of the data to be received by the sensor. (<500>

  So, I want to use the character of endpoint to stop the loop of producer that contain VISA READ.

  Should what special function or the property node I use to do this?

  I've attached a screenshot of JPEG of my code.

  PS: for the development of the VI, I simulate the sensor data with another PC that sent the hex string in loop
  with the stop character.

  CHRI = s = nour wrote:
  Hello

  But in the real work, I don't know the size of the data to be received by the sensor. (<500>

  A method to read an unknown number of bytes: put just the bytes to the Port in the whole loop (not read). Place the output of bytes to the Port into a shift register and compare the latest iteration with the current. When the number stops change (current loop = last loop) then all bytes have arrived. Bail out of the loop so directly while reading VISA.

• Different plan for the same sql id

  Hello

  Our team of application reported recently that a query ran longer than usual.

  Search in tables AWR (dba_hist_active_sess_history & dba_hist_sqlstat), it was a change of plan_hash_value. The next day, without intervention from anyone (collect statistics did not run, no change in the tables involved) the sql used the former plan and completed quickly.

  The differences in the plan was the index that was used to access the table.

  What could be the reason for the optimizer to choose a bad plan and return once more the good thing. ?

  The code sql that has been run twice & three in one day and then it years off cursor cache.

  Regime shifts are normal.

  Flipfloppping plans are quite normal.

  I'd be willing to bet that a large percentage of your SQL shows variations in implementation plans and you never notice.

  And there are several reasons why you might get a different plan.

  1 bind variable peeking - it is normal SQL for the age from the cache and then get analyzed once again with different bind variable leading to different cardinality estimates and plans

  2. the statistics change - it is normal that the statistics of change over time causing different cardinality estimates and the various plans, especially if the histograms are involved and changing buckets

  3. data change - especially if you use dynamic sampling it is normal to get a different sample of data leading to different cardinality estimates and plans

  4 SYSDATE - it's normal for queries with SYSDATE in them to recognize that time is never on leave and which, in conjunction with statistics or data, can lead to different cardinality estimates and plans

  5. integrated optimization features - it's normal for features like ACS to kick in and notice that they got forecasts wrong in an execution plan and force the recalculation to a different plan with an adjusted cardinality.

  Using DBMS_XPLAN. DISPLAY_CURSOR or DISPLAY_AWR you can get different plans (provided that they are in memory or AWR). The notes section should indicate cardinality comments have been a factor. You can also get links peeked with format mask of "+ PEEKED_BINDS".

• Can I change my normal photography to the subscription subscription student creative cloud?

  Hello

  I want to change my subscription (not student) normal photography for the subscription of cloud creative with all applications (for students), because im a student now.

  Is this possible?

  Hello

  Yes, you will be able to switch your subscription to plan photography to complete the creative cloud.

  Please get in touch with the customer for the same service:

  https://helpx.Adobe.com/contact.html?step=CCSN

  You can also check:

  Pricing plans and creative Cloud membership | Adobe Creative Cloud

  Please go through the Adobe - General conditions of subscription as well.

• jump the subroutine so busy normal priority

  I want to use the functionality of the subroutine jump if busy to a sub.vi of normal priority. Is it possible to do?

  This seems like a simple request, but I couldn't find on the discussion forums. Sorry if it's there and I missed it.

  I would say semaphores are your best best here.  Even if you had a property node, which would introduce some interesting race conditions.  What happens if you check to see if he was busy and then between check you that he was busy and actually call it, the other process has started running the Subvi?  You're now stuck in exactly what you're trying to prevent.  And Yes, such things happen.  The specific condition I have spoke to me (took a prominent developer and one of the best R & D of LabVIEW guy hours to find this race condition) involved searching for a queue reference be valid, then using the queue.  In fact, they were getting an error of invalid reference because the queue was destroyed by another process between searching the valid reference, and then using the reference.

  But the semaphore is simple to use and does the job.

  

• overflow memory for the producer consumer

  I'm trying to save data from 4 ports to 40.96 Mhz. using a producer consumer architecture and a PCIe NI 6527 B using an external clock.

  I inherited code which works for 2 ports.  I tried to add additional ports and changed the size of the data to the DAQ.mx queue and data.  Launch the program several times, reach conflicting error messages after less than 2 seconds from the beginning:

  Error 200284: Some or all of the requested samples are not yet acquired.  [...] To make available samples more quickly, increase your sampling rate

  200361 error: Overflow memory device on board.  Due to the limitations of system and/or the bandwidth of the bus, the driver could not read the device fast enough to follow the flow of the unit.  Reduce your sampling rate.

  What is a race condition between the error messages, a problem of timing of start or something else?

  I approach, how to debug these types of problems?  How can I determine what is causing the error?  I can't single step through because I'm at the wheel of sampling with an external clock.

  Running on labview 2012 Windows XP on the machine who's 3.17 GB of ram.

  Try to reduce the size of your buffer.  In fact, simply leave the calendar DAQmx unwired.  The size of the buffer must be large enough by default.  And then also try to read less data at a time, as data instead of data 500ms 10ms.  What I suspect here, it's that the DAQmx buffer is too large and therefore must use the hard drive for part of the buffer, to slow things down a lot.

  Other notes here:

  1. do not use the time-out to stop your loop of consumer.  Your producer should send an order of a certain type to your consumption by telling it to stop.  In this case, I would use an empty array.  And then, you must release the queue after the loop of the consumer.

  2. you want a constant FALSE to Append Array/String input size of the binary file write.  This will remove the 2 I32s at the beginning of each table that you write.  Eelle are here to tell the size of the table being written.  But since you are just data flow, I doubt that you care about those.

  3. instead of the entire setup of producer/consumer, have you considered using just the DAQmx Configure Logging VI do DAQmx stream directly to a TDMS file for you?  Makes things much faster and much easier on you.

• Data types in the design for the producer consumer model

  Is it possible for me to use any type of data in a model of design producer consumer, without specifying specific data type?

  what I mean is if there is a way to connect to a data type with which I can use any other type of data, not to mention that one that I have connected, and if not, how can I specify the data type for a number or any other data type, for use in a design of producer-consumer model?

  You can make a part of your cluster of data a Variant.  It will take any type of data.  A common architecture for the producer/consumer is a cluster which is an enum and a Variant.  The enum contains all possible "orders", you might want to send.  The variant contains data that could be of any type.

  Ungroup you in the consumer and get the enum and Variant.  Attach the enum to a case structure.  In the specific case, convert the variant type in a data type of regular LabVIEW and with it as you please.

• What is the fastest method producer consumer. Queue, RT-FIFO, event

  Hi all

  Another question completed for the pro:

  I recently inherited the labview code that uses RT-FIFO for the transfer mechanism in the architecture of the producer consumer.

  The code was first written in 3-4 years and is currently in LV8.6. It is possible that the reasons for the architectural decision no longer exists.

  I am qualified using a producer consumer queued architecture,

  I understand the RT-FIFO Architecture.

  I started using an architecture based on events from the user.

  (I have attached samples of each)

  I also see the existence of a priority queue

  Each method has its own capabilities and gaps, that hand, nobody knows the relative performance of each method.

  (Assuming that the only process)

  I would expect RT-FIFO to be faster, there seems to be a version of low characteristic of a standard queue.

  What is the perfornace hit to use a coding user-friendly queue more

  RT-FIFO description talks about commications between the time-critical and lower priority threads.

  Until today, I thought that the queues had the same capacity.

  

  I've included an event method that I commonly use for review by peers and help from other users...

  It allows to:

  1. several producers with different types of data

  2. process 37 production order.

  3 allows asynchronous verification of functional notifiers such as stop, start and abort.

  4. in a system not real-time, it can include interactions of façade.

  What I do not understand on this subject, that's what are overhead or thread priority changes that may occur using this architecture (it solves a lot of problems for me).

  Thanks in advance,

  Hi Timmar,

  Here's a KB article on some frequently asked questions about the RT FIFO: http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/7AE7075AF1B2C58486256AED006A029F?OpenDocument

  The more relevant question is #4, I posted below.

  What is the difference between RT FIFO and queues? 
  Functionally, RT FIFO and LabVIEW queues are two pads of first in, first out. However, here are the main differences between them:

  • RT FIFOs run deterministically in LabVIEW and evanescent code queues are not. This comes from the fact that queues use block calls during read/write to the resource shared, while RT FIFOs use non-blocking calls.
  • RT FIFO are fixed size while queues develop when items are added to them.
  • RT FIFOs will execute the code, even if there are input errors. They can (and will) produce new errors and spread the existing errors.
  • Queues work with any type of data, while the data types that can be used with RT FIFOs are limited. Generally any type of data involving allocations of extra memory can be used with RT FIFOs to preserve determinism.

  Let us know if you have persistent questions!

  Ryan

• First try the producer consumer Architecture: continuous play and dynamically update settings.

  Hello

  I am currently working with two instruments; an Agilent E3646A and a NI 6212 BNC. My goal is to have the 6212 continuously take measures according to predefined parameters while the E3646A parameters can be continuously updated. This combination simple instrument aims to help me learn the manual architecture; continuous measurement, output dynamic controls and instruments more will be added in the future.

  I've already posted on a similar, but more complicated configuration (http://forums.ni.com/t5/Instrument-Control-GPIB-Serial/Split-second-lag-when-controlling-two-instrum... and was advised to try the producer consumer Architecture.) I found the documentation on the website (http://www.ni.com/white-paper/3023/en/, https://decibel.ni.com/content/docs/DOC-2431), searched the forums and built my own VI. While my first attempt at a producer consumer Architecture has solved some of the problems I had when I posted on the subject, however, new questions have been raised regarding the reading and adoption of the VI.

  I am currently able to run the VI and update the settings on the device. Previously, I'd get a freeze while the instrument has been updated and could not switch settings until it was done. This has been resolved, although that reading updates only when a parameter has been updated, although it is outside the structure of the event. In addition, the Stop button does not in any context. I also got occasional mistakes on the part of Deqeue, but the major part of the sentence is error-200279 'A tried to read samples that are no longer available' to DAQmx Read. I realize that there is a problem in my loop of producer but have not been able to find a way to solve it.

  This is my first attempt at a producer consumer Architecture and already I can see that it is a powerful tool. I read as much as I could and looked at examples, but should have some problems at the beginning. Would be very grateful of any advice so I can take full advantage of the architecture.

  Hope to hear from you,

  Yusif Nurizade

  You're going to overflow this buffer, unless the events are generated faster than "sample rate/number of samples.   Period.  Nothing could be simpler.

  You don't need a local to stop your curls.

  Try something like this attachment.  I simply moved the structure of the event in its own loop dedicated since it had nothing to do with acquiring data at all.

  Data acquisition loop stops very well when you destroy the task and destrying the stops of power queue (sending the default values of the queue for the power control) for EXAMPLE, to ADD a group of setting 'Safe shutdown' to a 'package' and it wire to the Center terminal (Prototype).

• Programmatically change the number of producers in an architecture of producer/consumer

  Hi all

  I've got 3 momo SoMat I am streaming of data to 10 Hz. I plan on 3 producer loops and loop a consumer to treat.

  I am pretty sure when I show my customer that they want to increase the number of devices. This scuppers then the producer/consumer model unless I change by programming the number of producers and the rest of the architecture associated.

  Is there a way to do this or a better architecture?

  Phil

  As long as there is an ID any in your command of the queue, I do not see why your consumer cannot handle the producers as much as you need.  I would turn the producer code in a Subvi.  Make sure reentrant Subvi.  Then, you can call dynamically that VI as many times as you need, one for each instrument.

• Is the reference of the register of necessary shift in architecture of producer/consumer?

  Hi guys,.

  I was just wondering if the producer/consumer architecture is necessary register wired shift to the reference of the queue or the notifier. Is this necessary?

  I think that it isn't, because it's quite a tunnel but could anyone who thinks that the shift register is necessary, explain to me why it is necessary?

  In each of the samples I found the reference to the queue or the Notifier is connected to a shift register, I tried to wire it to a tunnel and it works well, then, what is the best implementation?

  Thank you in advance.

  Thank you guys for your quick responses...

• Instead of using the structure of the event with the producer consumer?

  I used the architecture of producer-consumer in the past to control a state machine with the structures of the event.  I'm working now with the basic version of LV that does not include the structure of the event.  Can anyone recommend alternatives to the use of the same architecture in this case?  Thank you, David

  Before the introduction of the structure of the event, the only option was the election.  Control terminals are in a time loop (the producer) with shift registers and a wait, usually about 100ms.  At each iteration of the loop, the control's current value is compared to the previous value.  If it has changed, and then take appropriate action.  Andrey suggested, queues are a good way to pass information between the loops.

  It works for the equivalent of the value change events.  Things like mouse to top or filter events were much more difficult or not possible.

  Lynn