Of the entity-level validation

Similar Questions

• How can I set an at the entity level validation rule

  Hi all
  I have a table that contains CompanyId DepartmentId, PostionId and PositionCode etc.
  I have to create a form to add new Postions in companies and departments.
  And I have to fix a contrint at the level of the entity such as group two number of records in this table have the same companyId and PostionCode information
  That's a companyId should not any document which is to have several codes Postion. Always the CompanyId PostionId combinaisondes must be unique.
  So I set a constraint in the entity level, I think that Yes...
  Please help with this problem...
  
  Thank you and best regards,
  Ranjith C

  create a key to spare for the CompanyId and PositionCode information...
  Have the validation of the key unique to the entity level...
  http://www.gabrielsideras.com/2010/09/28/ADF-unique-key-validation/
  http://andrejusb.blogspot.com/2011/07/unique-key-validation-for-lov-based-on.html

• get the entity level validation error after clicking the Cancel button

  Hi Experts,

  JDEV 12.1.3.0

  I have a popup and I create several rows in a table. And when you click on CANCEL, I get the validation error level feature on the home page.

  Cancel call the method below and also set immediate = "true".

  /*

  * return allchanges

  */

  {} public void refreshRemoveNewRow (rank)

  If ((row) .getNewRowState (ViewRowImpl) () == Row.STATUS_INITIALIZED) {}

  Row.Refresh (Row.REFRESH_UNDO_CHANGES + Row.REFRESH_REMOVE_NEW_ROWS + Row.REFRESH_FORGET_NEW_ROWS);

  } else {}

  Row.Refresh (Row.REFRESH_UNDO_CHANGES + Row.REFRESH_FORGET_NEW_ROWS);

  }

  }

  If I try with Rollback I get Transaction has expired. My behavior of workflow is also use existing Transaction if Possible.

  Thank you

  Roy

  Hello

  Try again with

  public void refreshRemoveNewRow(Row row) {
     if (((ViewRowImpl)row).getNewRowState() == Row.STATUS_INITIALIZED) {
           row.refresh(Row.REFRESH_UNDO_CHANGES +  Row.REFRESH_REMOVE_NEW_ROWS);
      } else {
           row.refresh(Row.REFRESH_UNDO_CHANGES + Row.REFRESH_FORGET_NEW_ROWS);
      }
  }
  

  Beside that, can you post the jdev console stack trace, to see which exactly entity and validator is in question...

• Popup is get closed after the entity level validation error.

  Hello

  I have a requirement where I am creates a line entity in a popup. In the context menu, I have an attribute which is mandatory under certain conditions. To do this, I said that EO level method validator that checks if filed value is entered or not when it is required.

  This validation happens correctly, I am able to see the error message in the user interface. But the problem is, popup closer, when I click on ' save record ' (this button calls the validation logic for the record) button in the user interface. " Becuse in the logic of the 'save' button, I close the popup (appellant hidePopup) after committing the registration. But it should only occur when the validation is successful. But it happens the same validation is not as successful. I mean, after the validation logic that he goes to the next run of line code. And the error message is displayed only after the execution of all the lines inside the method of the Save"" button.

  How can I limit the logic of hide popup on successful validation.

  Jdev version: 11.1.1.7.0

  Kind regards

  Dietsch.

  Hello

  When you run the validation operation programmatically try to see if there are errors;

  .

  .

  .

  operationBinding.execute ();

  If (operationBinding.getErrors () .isEmpty ()) {}

  Without exception, the operation is success

  } else {}

  Exception is thrown by the method, handle it here

  OperationBinding::getErrors() return list of local

  The list of errorList = operationBinding.getErrors ();

  Alternative route ' on error ' go here

  }

  If there is no error not to close the popup while if there isn't one, then close.

• Appeal of UI entity-level validation

  Hello

  I use jdev 12.1.3.0

  I have a feature object where I set the unique key constraint and this added to the entity-level validation.

  In my page user interface, I have af:table where I have the button to create a new line. Unique key validation is triggered when I click on validate.

  My requirement is to run this validation on strip off text field.

  Need your help to achieve this.

  Thank you

  Mozakkir

  What is the ChangeEventPolicy iterator in pageDef. ?

  If ChangeEventPolicy = "none" change for ChangeEventPolicy = "ppr" and try.

• Clear the Cache at the entity level.

  I created a view based on the Dept table. This DeptID in the Department table has a foreign key with the Employee table reference. I created the view based on the Department. Based on the DeptView JSPX page, I created the ADF table with delete, insert commit. When removing a DeptID 10, I got a message from the database foreign key violation. But the table, the row is deleted. When I try to insert a new line in the same message of forign key violation happens again and again. Please advise, is it possible to delete this message?
  
  Thank you
  
  Vishnu

  Of course
  catch the exception in the layer model (or backing bean) and preform the lower price from there.
  Inside the model layer, you get the transaction via

  appmodule.getTransaction().rollback();
  

  Is to make you leave a bean to support, download the module of the application and use the code above.

  Timo

• Salary and the date of validation at the OS level.

  Hi all
  
  I have two wage and Date fields both are present at the level of the OS
  
  I need to write a validation that if date of birth is entered on the user interface is more than 50 years as of today pay should not be less than 5000
  
  Ex: if entered date is 02/02/1961 and entered salary is 4500, then it must raise an error message when the button is clicked.
  
  There are to many validations customized at the OS level, but exactly where this is done.
  
  Thank you
  Arun

  Hello

  You can use a script expression for the attribute of salary at the entity level to calculate the age (DOB-based) and then trigger the error based on two conditions.

  Ex:

  Calendar now = Calendar.getInstance();
  Calendar dob = Calendar.getInstance();
  dob.setTime(); //Change it to the name of the attribute which holds the DOB.
  
  int year1 = now.get(Calendar.YEAR);
  int year2 = dob.get(Calendar.YEAR);
  int age = year1 - year2;
  int month1 = now.get(Calendar.MONTH);
  int month2 = dob.get(Calendar.MONTH);
  if (month2 > month1) {
    age--;
  } else if (month1 == month2) {
    int day1 = now.get(Calendar.DAY_OF_MONTH);
    int day2 = dob.get(Calendar.DAY_OF_MONTH);
    if (day2 > day1) {
      age--;
    }
  }
  
  if(age>=50 && newValue<5000) {
    adf.error.raise("SOME_ERROR")
    return false;
  }
  else return true;
  

  Define SOME_ERROR in the section of the error of the Add Rule dialog box.

  Arun-

• OPA is supports the rules of visibility to the instance level?

  
  Hi team,

  We have the scenario where we need to display a text-based data from the entity.

  Created visibility rule of "the personal ifnormation should be displayed" If

  the age of the person is over 18 (the person is the entity). and applied to the entity level where I created the Label "personal information."

  I debugged and created 2 instances. We're with the age is less than 18 and the other is with more than 18 years.

  It should display "Personal ifnormation" for the age is greater than 18 instance and should not display the value of age instance corresponding less than 18 years.

  Thank you

  Viv

  You can get close to what you're trying to do by adding an attribute to the child "the child is over 18 years of age"with a rule that is appropriate

  The entity collect collect screen 'age of the child' and 'additional information '. "References" field is mandatory if "the child has more than 18 years ' is true and so illustrious" the child has more than 18 years ' is true. " Entities are then added and the regulatory age gathered for each, when 'Next' is clicked if all children are under 16 years old, otherwise the entity re collect screen - see the following screen appears with "References" field visible (and mandatory) for each child who is over 18 years old.

  If you are willing to the childs age selected in a drop-down list, then you might make it age using a list of values which can be used directly as a condition of visibility. Of course, this would mean having to collect the age of the child directly rather than their date of birth, for example.

  I use the 15 Nov OPA release, I do not know if all of these features where, in previous versions.

  Ian

• "The constraints of validation" do not seem to import correctly.  Is this a bug?

  I boned my schema tables (file-> import-> data dictionary) and I noticed that "validation constraints" do not seem to import correctly.  While I peut see them perform a preview of the DDL, I can't understand how to modify them in the model.

  If you use the table in the example below, you will notice when you double-click on TEST_DEMO , which transports you to the properties of the Table, there is no place to view or change the constraints validation.  I guess that they are subject to constraints of Table-level but they are no where.

  Here is the example:

  CREATE THE TABLE APEX_DEMO. TEST_DEMO

  (ID NUMBER CONSTRAINT TEST_DEMO_ID_NN NOT NULL,)

  APPLICATION_TYPE VARCHAR2 (30) TEST_DEMO_APP_TYPE_NN DEFAULT 'APEX' CONSTRAINT NOT NULL,.

  LOG_SEVERITY VARCHAR2 (20) DEFAULT 'INFO' CONSTRAINT TEST_DEMO_LOG_SEVERITY_NN NOT NULL,

  APP_USERNAME VARCHAR2 (32) TEST_DEMO_APP_USER_NN DEFAULT "S/O" CONSTRAINT NOT NULL

  );

  ALTER TABLE APEX_DEMO. (ADD) TEST_DEMO

  CONSTRAINT TEST_DEMO_APP_TYPE_CC

  CHECK (APPLICATION_TYPE ("APEX", "DATABASE", 'WEB_SERVICE'))

  ENABLE VALIDATE);

  ALTER TABLE APEX_DEMO. (ADD) TEST_DEMO

  CONSTRAINT TEST_DEMO_LOG_SEVERITY_CC

  CHECK (LOG_SEVERITY IN ("INFO", "DEBUG", "WARNING", "ERROR", "CRITICAL"))

  ENABLE VALIDATE);

  For column-level constraints, double-click the column name in the table properties dialog box. Detailed properties appears. Are there constraints and default values.

  For the table level validation constraints, open the physical model (under relational node) and open the node of the table. Then you will see a Table Check Constraint level node. You can't go to the diagram.

• Validation of the attribute levels

  Hello

  I need to perform validation levels attribute between these two fields of type numbers, when the user tab in both areas if size is higher then its size fires and displays a message on the field from waist, well want to tell me how to do this?

  JDeveloper 11.1.1.6.0

  

  Kind regards

  Peyrot

  Take a look at:

  http://sundarakrishna.blogspot.com/2013/11/ADF-entity-object-entity-level-and.html

• How to change the user interface of the entity object indicators / Validation msg when running?

  Hello

  I use JDeveloper with version 11.1.1.6.3. Given my requirment details below.

  Suppose I have a (say 'EMPLOYEE_RATING') table in DB with the following structure.

  Columns:

  1 EmployeeId (Employee Id)

  2 RatingType (values can be in Stock or Bonus)

  3 RatingLevel (values can be 1, 2, and 3)

  Constraint:

  EmployeeId, RatingType and RatingLevel all together must be unique.

  Requirement:

  The customer's requirement is to have two screens of rating (one for Bonus another stock) and display different user interface boards and validations as follows.

  1 RatingType is a hidden field, are defined with the default (Bonus or Stock) based on the screen that the user opens.

  1. for the Stock screen, RatingLevel label should be "Stock note.

  2. for the Bonus screen, the label should be 'Bonus Rating'.

  3. for validation, the message must be 'Bonus note level must be unique' or 'Level of Stock of notes must be unique' ADB on the user screen opens.

  Implementation:

  I have a def EO (for example "RatingEO") and VO (for example ' RatingVO') def. Tips UI (Label) are given at the level of the OS. Also the unique constraint validation is made to EO with the message ' {0} and {1} must be unique, where {0} is source.hints.EmployeeId.label "and {1} is source.hints.RatingLevel.label.  I also did the shuttle two different instances of the VO (EmployeeRatingBonusVO and EmployeeRatingStockVO) in the request form (although BonusTaskFlow and StockTaskFlow are set to open with the new transaction, Intension of the two shuttle different named instances is to have the common code in VO. impl class but can run different business logic code by checking the name of the instance of VO)

  Question:

  Since I have two different pages, I can define two different labels in the jsff, but I can't change the commit message defined at the level of object entity based on open display. At the opening of the screen, depending on the type of screen, I should be able to change the label specified at the level of the entity object. (It should not affect the definition but only the instance). As this entity object cannot be distinguished (if it belongs to Bonus or Stock), I have problem on how to change the indicators of UI during execution.

  Any help on this would be appreciated! Thank you.

  Rami

  Post edited by: rami

  I tried your script.

  I created the secondary key with EmployId and rating level. I added validation of Unique key. In failure handling handling section of the validator, I gave the error message like: {0} must be unique. For token 0: I gave RatingType (here RatingType is the name of the attribute in OT).

  We give the default for RatingType as Stock Bonus in VO. kind RatingType get its value or Stock Bonus based on the original Version that we use.

  I hope this helps.

• Where to add the transitional attribute at the level of the entities or view level? And where to use {return getTransientAttribute()} in the entity or view?

  Mr President

  JDev 12.2.1.

  Where to add the transitional attribute at the level of the entities or view level?

  And where to use {return getTransientAttribute()} in the entity or view?

  public Number getAmount()  
    {  
      return getTransientAttribute();  
      //return (Number) getAttributeInternal(AMOUNT);  
    }  
  
  

  Concerning

  A difference I could think: place a transient attribute on EO level will make transaction dirty (DBTransaction.isDirty returns true) when the field is changed.

  From a design point of view, I tend to place the transient fields at the level VO, because most of the time they are for the presentation of the data in the user interface.

  Only when the transient fields are involved in DML operations (for example when you call a stored procedure EntityImpl.doDML) I place the transitional area on EO.

• Reporting at level 0 of half my Structure of the entity

  I have a structure of the entity in my hierarchy with two children, 'Corporate' and 'communities '. I would point out at level 0 of the 'Communities' Member, but I get the 'Corporate' kids in my report as well.
  
  How can I set up so that the level 0 members 'Communities' is included in my report?
  
  Thanks in advance for your help.

  If you get both, it seems that you do not use the operator exact (?).
  In the Select Member dialog box, make sure that you click the Advanced mode button, and then select change the Union operator to 'and '.

• Journal templates change the entity in POV after validation

  Hi guys,.

  We have recently migrated to the 11.1.2.3 version. After the creation of models of journal with a specific entity registered in the POV, we notice that wen posting journals, the entity on the POV has been reset to the entity at the top of the hierarchy.  Each unique journal is posted in the wrong place, although in the model, there is a predefined entity.

  Have you ever experienced this problem? How do solve you?

  Thank you!

  JAI

  Hi Jai,

  Install the patch appropriate to upgrade to version 11.1.2.3.500. We had a similar problem and the patch solved that one.

  See you soon,.

  Luli

• Entity object - Validation of Composite primary key

  Hi people,
  
  Can someone help me to implement this? I have a custom table created with an entity object based on that. However, this table has a PK composed of three columns of number. The developer's guide says that PK validation should be performed inside the setter for the attribute using findByPrimaryKey PK, because for a simple PK validation is level of attribute, but in this case, I have three bombers distinct and three distinct attributes of PK, which makes the PK cross-attribute validation.
  
  I tried to implement this in the validateEntity() because it is cross-attribute, but still, the validation fails. In my view, which is related to the fact that when validateEntity() fires, the entity itself is already in the cache, and the call to findByPrimaryKey() causes BC4J return a single game. Here is the code inside the validateEntity() for me:
  

          // First validation: Primary Key Uniqueness
          if (this.getEntityState() == STATUS_NEW || this.getEntityState() == STATUS_INITIALIZED) {
              EntityDefImpl def = PeriodEOImpl.getDefinitionObject();
              EntityImpl period = def.findByPrimaryKey(getOADBTransaction(), getPrimaryKey());
              if (period != null) {
                  // ERROR: DUPLICATE KEY FOUND
                  throw new OARowValException( OAException.TYP_ENTITY_OBJECT
                                             , getEntityDef().getFullName()
                                             , getPrimaryKey()
                                             , "MSG_APP"
                                             , "MSG_NAME" );
              }
          }

  Y at - it assumptions that I am causing that validation always fail? Is there anyone who had the same requirement and implemented a working solution to this? I looked through the dev guide and other sources, but this simple and common requirement seems to be forgotten.
  
  Thank you very much and it concerns!
  Thiago

  You make a transaction fictitious attribute in the EO and do a Composite key of four attributes instead of three. This additional attribute must ensure the automatic error of the OA framework is not present. Now you can enter commands using validateEntity. Don't bother abt the value stored in the temporary attribute because it would be lost anyway.

  Concerning
  Sumit