Appeal of UI entity-level validation

Similar Questions

• get the entity level validation error after clicking the Cancel button

  Hi Experts,

  JDEV 12.1.3.0

  I have a popup and I create several rows in a table. And when you click on CANCEL, I get the validation error level feature on the home page.

  Cancel call the method below and also set immediate = "true".

  /*

  * return allchanges

  */

  {} public void refreshRemoveNewRow (rank)

  If ((row) .getNewRowState (ViewRowImpl) () == Row.STATUS_INITIALIZED) {}

  Row.Refresh (Row.REFRESH_UNDO_CHANGES + Row.REFRESH_REMOVE_NEW_ROWS + Row.REFRESH_FORGET_NEW_ROWS);

  } else {}

  Row.Refresh (Row.REFRESH_UNDO_CHANGES + Row.REFRESH_FORGET_NEW_ROWS);

  }

  }

  If I try with Rollback I get Transaction has expired. My behavior of workflow is also use existing Transaction if Possible.

  Thank you

  Roy

  Hello

  Try again with

  public void refreshRemoveNewRow(Row row) {
     if (((ViewRowImpl)row).getNewRowState() == Row.STATUS_INITIALIZED) {
           row.refresh(Row.REFRESH_UNDO_CHANGES +  Row.REFRESH_REMOVE_NEW_ROWS);
      } else {
           row.refresh(Row.REFRESH_UNDO_CHANGES + Row.REFRESH_FORGET_NEW_ROWS);
      }
  }
  

  Beside that, can you post the jdev console stack trace, to see which exactly entity and validator is in question...

• How can I set an at the entity level validation rule

  Hi all
  I have a table that contains CompanyId DepartmentId, PostionId and PositionCode etc.
  I have to create a form to add new Postions in companies and departments.
  And I have to fix a contrint at the level of the entity such as group two number of records in this table have the same companyId and PostionCode information
  That's a companyId should not any document which is to have several codes Postion. Always the CompanyId PostionId combinaisondes must be unique.
  So I set a constraint in the entity level, I think that Yes...
  Please help with this problem...
  
  Thank you and best regards,
  Ranjith C

  create a key to spare for the CompanyId and PositionCode information...
  Have the validation of the key unique to the entity level...
  http://www.gabrielsideras.com/2010/09/28/ADF-unique-key-validation/
  http://andrejusb.blogspot.com/2011/07/unique-key-validation-for-lov-based-on.html

• Popup is get closed after the entity level validation error.

  Hello

  I have a requirement where I am creates a line entity in a popup. In the context menu, I have an attribute which is mandatory under certain conditions. To do this, I said that EO level method validator that checks if filed value is entered or not when it is required.

  This validation happens correctly, I am able to see the error message in the user interface. But the problem is, popup closer, when I click on ' save record ' (this button calls the validation logic for the record) button in the user interface. " Becuse in the logic of the 'save' button, I close the popup (appellant hidePopup) after committing the registration. But it should only occur when the validation is successful. But it happens the same validation is not as successful. I mean, after the validation logic that he goes to the next run of line code. And the error message is displayed only after the execution of all the lines inside the method of the Save"" button.

  How can I limit the logic of hide popup on successful validation.

  Jdev version: 11.1.1.7.0

  Kind regards

  Dietsch.

  Hello

  When you run the validation operation programmatically try to see if there are errors;

  .

  .

  .

  operationBinding.execute ();

  If (operationBinding.getErrors () .isEmpty ()) {}

  Without exception, the operation is success

  } else {}

  Exception is thrown by the method, handle it here

  OperationBinding::getErrors() return list of local

  The list of errorList = operationBinding.getErrors ();

  Alternative route ' on error ' go here

  }

  If there is no error not to close the popup while if there isn't one, then close.

• Of the entity-level validation

  Hi all
  At Jdev11g, I put the validation on the level of the attribute to check if a field (example password) contains only alphanumeric.
  I used the rule Type like regular Expression with the value of the regular expression [A-Za-z0-9] +.
  I'm worried, why this validation is not getting fired upward?
  Please help me get around this problem.
  
  
  Kind regards
  Bernadette

  Hello

  If you test your expression, he is happy if only one of the input characters is alphanumeric

  Frank

• Entity object - Validation of Composite primary key

  Hi people,
  
  Can someone help me to implement this? I have a custom table created with an entity object based on that. However, this table has a PK composed of three columns of number. The developer's guide says that PK validation should be performed inside the setter for the attribute using findByPrimaryKey PK, because for a simple PK validation is level of attribute, but in this case, I have three bombers distinct and three distinct attributes of PK, which makes the PK cross-attribute validation.
  
  I tried to implement this in the validateEntity() because it is cross-attribute, but still, the validation fails. In my view, which is related to the fact that when validateEntity() fires, the entity itself is already in the cache, and the call to findByPrimaryKey() causes BC4J return a single game. Here is the code inside the validateEntity() for me:
  

          // First validation: Primary Key Uniqueness
          if (this.getEntityState() == STATUS_NEW || this.getEntityState() == STATUS_INITIALIZED) {
              EntityDefImpl def = PeriodEOImpl.getDefinitionObject();
              EntityImpl period = def.findByPrimaryKey(getOADBTransaction(), getPrimaryKey());
              if (period != null) {
                  // ERROR: DUPLICATE KEY FOUND
                  throw new OARowValException( OAException.TYP_ENTITY_OBJECT
                                             , getEntityDef().getFullName()
                                             , getPrimaryKey()
                                             , "MSG_APP"
                                             , "MSG_NAME" );
              }
          }

  Y at - it assumptions that I am causing that validation always fail? Is there anyone who had the same requirement and implemented a working solution to this? I looked through the dev guide and other sources, but this simple and common requirement seems to be forgotten.
  
  Thank you very much and it concerns!
  Thiago

  You make a transaction fictitious attribute in the EO and do a Composite key of four attributes instead of three. This additional attribute must ensure the automatic error of the OA framework is not present. Now you can enter commands using validateEntity. Don't bother abt the value stored in the temporary attribute because it would be lost anyway.

  Concerning
  Sumit

• Need help: performs an attribute-level Validation

  Hi refugees,

  In the OPS how to perform Validation of the attribute levels?

  How to compare the values of two attributes?

  My requirement is I Amountfrom and Amountto articles in the area of Table having 10 records...

  validation is here amounted to must be greater than the quantity of, so for that I need to perform validation in the class of EOImpl...

  To do this, I need to read the value of AmountFrom and compare with AmountTo...

  Here, my question is, how to read the value of AmountFrom...

  Its urgent...
  

  1. Please... Give your valuable suggestions...

  Thank you

  Jaya

  It's really nice

  In addition, close threads once your problem solved.

• How to put in place a page-level validation!

  Hello
  
  I want to implement the validation of levels page.
  
  Thank you
  
  Published by: kumar73 on April 21, 2010 13:41

  Should be pretty easy - your state of health would probably be just the click of the button (the button name) or the value of the request sent by the button (SEND?) You can make a function that returns a Boolean as type

  The code would be something like:

  begin
    if :P1_SHUTTLE is not null or
    :P1_SHUTTLE2 is not null or
    :P1_SHUTTLE3 is not null or
    :P1_SHUTTLE4 is not null or
    :P1_SHUTTLE5 is not null then
      return(true);
    else
      return(false);
    end if;
  end;
  

• Clear the Cache at the entity level.

  I created a view based on the Dept table. This DeptID in the Department table has a foreign key with the Employee table reference. I created the view based on the Department. Based on the DeptView JSPX page, I created the ADF table with delete, insert commit. When removing a DeptID 10, I got a message from the database foreign key violation. But the table, the row is deleted. When I try to insert a new line in the same message of forign key violation happens again and again. Please advise, is it possible to delete this message?
  
  Thank you
  
  Vishnu

  Of course
  catch the exception in the layer model (or backing bean) and preform the lower price from there.
  Inside the model layer, you get the transaction via

  appmodule.getTransaction().rollback();
  

  Is to make you leave a bean to support, download the module of the application and use the code above.

  Timo

• How to adopt the validation of level entity such as BC ADF using EJB/JPA?

  I explore how to implement validation to entity level using the EJB/JPA instead of ADF BC. (Note: I use JDeveloper + ADF 12 c)

  1. I cannot add validation attribute level in the ADF (Data Control) of EJB model layer. but it is not enough. I can just code partial UI validation here.

  2. I googled and find that someone is using jsr-303-bean-validation. What is a unique choice? How the entity-level validation code?

  Validation of the JPA EJB ADF application entity

  3. I want to implement certain business validation and processing business in the layer of business ADF service, as in the EJB method.

  I did a simple test to simulate an exception, but I found the exception has been handled incorrectly in the layer of binding of ADF and error dialog box prompt: DCA-29000: Unexpected exception caught: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException, msg = null.

      public Departments persistDepartments(Departments departments) {
          if(true){
            throw new RuntimeException("persistDepartments");
          }
          em.persist(departments);
          return departments;
      }
  
  
  
  

  Any expert can help? will I have to rewrite the ADF Model layer error handling? How to code the validation in EJB? you will need to take local and manipulate it in class in the ADF error handling model layer? where can I find a demo?

  4. I want to introduce a layer of application service between EJB session façade and JPA entity for the re-use of the company.  but I found JDeveloper helps me to do anything. I do code manually, when I create EJB session façade, it always integrate directly with JPA entity inside.  I expect that my application service is class instead of the EJB POJO.  Session EJB façade summons enforcement and demand serviceshall call JPA entity services.  is this possible? any sugguestion?

  Thank you

  Qn1, the ADF Model layer Validation are supported at the level of the validation attribute. It is confirmed.

  Qn2, it seems that this is a better solution, but is not Explorer so far.

  Qn3 is resloved by creating a custom error handler to extract a validation thrown from EJB exception and at the same time, it cannot be avoided that the thrown exception of service business layer is still dumped at MTS-out.

  Qn4 is reslolved by employment Commission to inject POJO, EJB session faade and inject POJO EntityManager (use JTA transaction).

  Thanks to you all!

• Rich Table: entity validation fails, but the user can change the record! : O

  Hello
  I develop with JDeveloper 11.1.2.1.0 and I have the following problem. I have a rich table editable according to entity/view with a line entity level validator method that checks the consistency of rank according to custom rules.
  I noticed that if the validator fails, the error message is displayed correctly, but it is possible to move to a different folder and this causes a lot of problems. I need avoid recording of variation when this validator fails. I know there is a way to block navigation on an element using clientListener and javascript, but it's a different need because I don't want the user to change the recording while the validator fails.
  How can I do?
  Thank you
  
  Roberto

  Roberto R SCC wrote:
  I noticed that if the validator fails, the error message is displayed correctly, but it is possible to move to a different folder and this causes a lot of problems. I need avoid recording of variation when this validator fails. I > know there is a way to block navigation on an element using clientListener and javascript, but it's a different need because I don't want the user to change the recording while the validator fails.
  How can I do?

  When you change a line, it is the currentRow on the iterator. You do not want any line to become the currentRow.
  I would go to this topic, in this way: substitute the selectionListener table and the listener to custom selection, check if the current currentRow (the one you are editing) isValid (EntityImpl::isValid).
  Proceed with the treatment of the selection event only if it is validated... You could even show an error or a warning message asking the user to provide valid data and even commit the line before choosing another.
  (Sorry, don't have an example of a code of practice now)

• Validation message component ADF inputComboBoxListOfValue not appear.

  Hi all

  I use jdev 11.1.1.5.0. I have create a LOV and drag as an inputComboBoxListOfValue component.

  in this entity level validation attribute is perform validation method. but commit message not diplay until user click on any other button.

  but autoSubmit is true.

  the code is following.

  < af:inputComboboxListOfValues id = "ptodtId".

  popupTitle = "search and select: #{bindings.ptodt.hints.label} '"

  value = "#{Bindings.ptodt.inputValue} '"

  Model = "#{Bindings.ptodt.listOfValuesModel} '"

  required = "false".

  Columns = "#{Bindings.ptodt.hints.DisplayWidth} '"

  shortDesc = "#{bindings.ptodt.hints.tooltip} '"

  visible = "#{sessionScope.Status} '"

  inlineStyle = "width: 5px;"

  valueChangeListener = "#{pageFlowScope.TaExpEntryBean.getArrivalDate} '"

  partialTriggers = "v_Onbehalf_Name1Id".

  Binding = "#{pageFlowScope.TaExpEntryBean.ptodt} '"

  autoSubmit = "true" >

  < f: validator binding="#{bindings.ptodt.validator}"/ >

  < / af:inputComboboxListOfValues >

  concerning

  Manish

  Hello

  I had this problem in inputListOfValue, please check this: validation error message is not displayed for an attribute is a value of the entry list

  Kind regards

  Habib

• Customization of the EO validation messages

  (11.1.1.6 JDeveloper) example use case:
  -J' have an EO that maps to a VO that is displayed in two tabs different jsff (tab1, tab2).
  -L'EO has an attribute (say Myint of type oracle.jbo.domain.Number which is a type of db NUMBER (10,0)).
  -Myint appears in two tabs, but in tab1 he is referred to as "int1" and tab2 as "int2".
  
  -L' attribute has a validation rule (at the level of the EO) based on the type of the corresponding db (essentially asking that it is an integer).
  
  
  I read / believe that validation, if possible has to be done at the level of the OS (and it is logical that you set once and reuse it in all screens).
  Here are my questions:
  
  (1) in the pop-up "Edit Validation rule" (EO), I can set an error message according to a key of rb.
  In my case, I have a generic message like "an integer value is required for the field 'Myint'."
  How do I customize the messages for specific jsff tabs, for example, receive messages such as:
  
  Integer value is necessary for the field 'int1'.'
  Integer value is necessary for the field "int2". "
  
  I want to avoid customer validation; but I would also be able to customize my error message. Is there a way to do this?
  I know that I can get an expression for the text of the message, but still it does not really help me.
  
  Now if I can't do that, not this limits the use of the validation of the EO?
  
  (2) is it possible to have the ADF to create the red box around the wrong field. In my view, it's nice to have because it directly identifies the question.
  
  Thank you

  Hello

  I use JDev 11 g R2 and it has a red box has highlighted for any failure of the validation of the attribute (your point No. 2) but don't know if that's where your jdev version :)

  Coming to your question,

  EO, it's always the same field is independent from vo1 or vo2 and you don't have control of the vow/vo2 directly on EO validation messages, but you can get your condition in two ways

  Option #1. You can have a custom entity-level validation (call your custom method with the message that you ever want to throw)
  Option no. 2: you can create a transient attribute in your EO chain type and update your VO1 and VO2 to add the new transitional attribute and always keep this transient int1 and int2 attribute (depending on your use of VO)
  and now, in your attribute validation error message, you can use placeholder to read the value of the transient attribute

  for example error message like you to "Please fill the value for the field {field}".
  and it will fill the field in the list of the tokens in the same window of the editor, he value of field give him like name of the attribute of the transitional attribute.

  Kind regards
  Delighted Nuka.

• Bug: ViewObject programmatic and form Validation

  Hello
  
  I've set up a display object as described here: http://stackoverflow.com/a/14611815/59087
  
  Assigned to the view object is a shown here validation rule: http://i.imgur.com/HXiwPUL.png
  
  The StartDate attribute value must be a date equal to or earlier than the EndDate attribute.
  
  The view object is not supported by an entity. With the help of an entity here is not logically necessary as these input parameters are intended to be transmitted directly to a report. The parameters are independent of an entity and rather arbitrary.
  
  When a February 1, 2013 start date and an end date of February 28, 2013 are given, a validation rule error: http://i.imgur.com/8v4007w.png
  
  You can see how the view object has been created here: http://imgur.com/HQLNh5U, uqtt5Fq, X8fldVt, HXiwPUL, 8v4007w #0
  
  This was recorded as a SR with Oracle and received the following response, "I guess the question here is this place where you added the validation. If this is added to the attribute level, then he will be fired by updating the attributes and there is no guarantee of the order of the attributes updates. If this is not the right place for you to add validation dealing with several attributes of value. Ideally it should have been added as entity level validation in your OE. And if your VO is updatab; e, that he must have been supported by EO-it is British Colombia was designed.
  If EO the introduction is not possible now, maybe, you can try to replicate the validation at the attribute level and trigger the validation of the attribute last updated"
  
  I'm fairly certain that by selecting programmatic (http://i.imgur.com/HQLNh5U.png), this means that no entity is necessary for the view.
  
  In addition, given that the Rules of Validation tab appears (http://i.imgur.com/HXiwPUL.png), and a comparison rule can be defined, it leads me to believe that it is a bug.
  
  As a workaround, I can define an 'empty' entity that is not accompanied by a database object and performs an entity-level validation. I don't like this because it is a little more work and requires the implementation of a transitional 'ID' fake to uniquely identify the row.
  
  Other ideas (how can I enforce the order of updates of attributes so that StartDate is filled in the view before EndDate object, thereby ensuring that the validation is successful)?
  
  Published by: Dave.Jarvis on February 7, 2013 11:31

  Dave, support has a point here. Level of the attribute validation cannot cover the rules that have other attributes in the rule. In this case, you are detailed on the order of the attributes. The reason is that the validation of the attribute levels fires when the attribute changes its value. This is why the framework allows entity level validation (naturally only on an EO) where you can assume that all values are up to date and can be compared with each other.
  However, on a view levels validation object only transient attributes attribute is permitted. As is the validation of the attribute levels the same ruling applies as for EO. You should not compare two attributes of a levels of attribute validation rule as you cannot predict the order attributes and so you cannot predict the outcome of the rule.
  I do not see a bug here, such as validation to only at the level of the attribute.

  OK, what can you do?
  You can add an EO (as you said already) and add a level entity rule it. It will work, but needs some work more.
  You can remove the date field validation rules. MinValue and validate them in for example a bean or you can even use a method that is exposed in the client interface of your VO for this. Then, you call the method when the user clicks the button before you start the report. When the rule is triggered, you do not start the report, but the message.

  Timo

• Validation of the transitional attribute does not

  Hello
  
  I use the JDeveloper 11.1.1.6.0. In an entity object, I have a few transient attributes. These attributes represent the hours and the minutes and will be calculated from a databasecolumn that stores this time in minutes. The model I'm working with is defined in another library in the ADF.
  
  You imagine of course, the user should only be able to give the minutes between 0 and 59 minutes. So I created a validator on these transient attributes. When I now test validation in the AppModule it works when I set the validator on the entity object level, if I set them only to the level of the view object, they do not work.
  This isn't a big deal, of the entity-level validation would be fine for me, but the problem is on my page that the valdiation also seems to not work. I can put in values greater than 60 and I don't see the error message defined. Or change the focus of the field or an iteration in the following dataset.

  Hello

  try to set autoSubmit = "true" on command