OIF signing certificate update

Similar Questions

• receiving the OCSP signing certificate valid error in the OCSP response;

  From 08:00 this morning, I started getting the following: valid OCSP signing certificate in OCSP response. (Error code: sec_error_ocsp_invalid_signing_cert) when you try to load any page on FANFICTION.NET; before that time, I was actively looking at Web site.

  This problem occurs always from 10:43 AM EDT despite the posts here saying that this is resolved. Features of the site very well with Chrome and IE.

  I use the version of 31.0 Firefox on a laptop Windows 8.1

  The question seems not himself have resolved to our site this morning. Don't know exactly what has changed, but for what it's worth, we are hosted on Amazon EC2, so maybe they have updated something.

• Creation of my own CA, self-signed certificates and the use of these

  I'm stupid. Three years ago, I created my own CA and my own wildcard certificate for my OS X Server (always 10.8.5 with Server 2.2.5). I install my public Root CA on clients who make use of my server. At these must not often updated and the work is complex, so I created a CA Vault take care of a few scripts and configuration of openssl. What I forgot is document how to get these used by Server.app. That's why I'm stupid, because I struggle to reproduce what I did and discovered three years ago.

  I use two scripts. (MYNAME, mydomain and tld are generic strings, of course in reality I use my own name and mydomain.tld)

  The first is for the creation of a root certification authority:

  #!/bin/bash
  
  # Only edit these:
  mycaname="MYNAME Certificate Authority"
  myrootname=mydomaincaroot
  
  # Run in current dir:
  mydir=`pwd`
  
  mkdir RootCert >/dev/null 2>&1
  
  if [ ! -e "$mydir"/RootCert/"$myrootname".key -o \
       -e "$mydir"/RootCert/"$myrootname".crt ]
  then
      openssl req -config "$mydir"/openssl.cnf \
    -new -x509 \
    -keyout "$mydir"/RootCert/"$myrootname".key \
    -out "$mydir"/RootCert/"$myrootname".crt \
    -days 3650
      openssl pkcs12 -export -clcerts \
    -inkey "$mydir"/RootCert/"$myrootname".key \
    -in "$mydir"/RootCert/"$myrootname".crt \
    -out "$mydir"/RootCert/"$myrootname".p12 \
    -name "$mycaname"
  
      echo "Now import ""$mydir""/RootCert/""$myrootname"".p12 in KeyChain"
      echo "For this, unlock the System KeyChain first, then import"
      echo "NOTE: this imports your private key in the System Keychain"
      echo "So it can be used for signing activities."
      echo "This is less safe then keeping your private key on media that"
      echo "cannot be accessed from the system, like a safely stored USB stick"
  else
      echo "Your root CA crt and key already exist! I will not overwrite this"
      echo "as this could overwrite a still used private key and lose you access"
      echo "to signed certificates, e.g. for revoking them"
  fi
  

  I think I know what to do (but Advisor is always welcome). I have to add the certificate of generic identity for the Keychain system, after which I can use in.app.

  Now I encounter another problem: when I enter the certificate in the system Keychain, it ends up in/etc/certificates without a. fichier.pem. See: OS X 10.8.5 Server 2.2.5/Keychain Access certificates issue for more details.

  Help is always welcome.

• cannot install self-signed certificates sbs2008 on Vista SP2 with IE8

  I use SBS2008 Setup and it is to use self-signed certificates,

  My laptop is Windows Vista SP2 with IE8.

  When I try and connect to my OWA SBS2008 Web site, I get this error: there is a problem with this site's secure certificate.

  I tried to solve my problem with this solution: http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2008/05/08/installing-a-self-signed-certificate-as-a-trusted-root-ca-in-windows-vista.aspx , don't worry! In date; May 8, 2008

  I also looked at: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb; EN-US; 932156 , dated; November 19, 2008

  This link is on the page above: download the update for Windows Vista (KB932156) package now. , dated March 24, 2008. I understand that all of the above links are ment to work with Vista & IE7, there is no mention of the Service Pack level.

  This patch really works on Vista SP2 with IE8 or do I have to change the registry and if so, this key is always the right pair?

  HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\SystemCertificates\Root\ProtectedRoots

  Thank you

  Hello

  Questions like these are much better handled in the TechNet IT Pro Forums.

  My moderator tools cannot transfer messages on Windows forums, please re - ask you question there.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/itprovistanetworking/threads

• Generate a DRAC 7 - new self-signed certificate

  Try to generate a new cert self-signed by the DRAC, but keep the size to 2048 bits.

  racadm config-g cfgRacSecurity-o cfgRacSecCsrKeySize 2048

  sslresetcfg restores the cert to 1024...

  racadm sslresetcfg

  Counsel on how to obtain a self-signed certificate 2048?

  iDRAC 7 2.10.10.10 Firmware go iDRAC have by default with 2048-bit certificate. You can update iDRAC to 2.10.10.10 and run the command "racadm sslresetcfg" to load the default certificate of 2.10.10.10 firmware.

  iDRAC7 2.10.10.10 Firmware is available @ http://www.dell.com/support/home/us/en/19/Drivers/DriversDetails?driverId=Y5K20&fileId=3445456701&osCode=NAA&productCode=poweredge-r820&languageCode=EN&categoryId=LC

• Cannot use jar with icon files gif and self signed certificate files (Exception in thread "AWT-EventQueue-3" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: oracle/ewt/laf/basic/SelColorChange)

  Hi all.

  I use Forms 11 g 11.1.2.1 and updating JRE 7 45.

  I have create a jar file containing gif icons files using this procedure:

  (1) create the jar file:

  set path = % path %; C:\Oracle\Middleware\Oracle_FRHome1\jdk\bin (my ORACLE_HOME/jdk)

  jar - cvf webfigolos.jar *.gif

  (2) self sign the file:

  c:\Oracle\Middleware\asinst_1\bin > sign_webutil.bat c:\Oracle\Middleware\Oracle_FRHome1\forms\java\webfigoicons.jar

  Jars is signed but with a warning:

  Generate a signature key certificate aaosa2015 = auto...

  keytool error: java.lang.Exception: key pair not generated, al alias < aaosa2015 >

  loan is

  .

  There are errors or warnings while generating a self signed certificate. Pleas

  e revisiting.

  .

  Backup as c: C:\Oracle\Middleware\Oracle_FRHome1\forms\java\webfigoicons.jar

  \Oracle\Middleware\Oracle_FRHome1\forms\java\webfigoicons.jar.old...

  1 file (s) copied.

  Signature using ke c:\Oracle\Middleware\Oracle_FRHome1\forms\java\webfigoicons.jar

  y = aaosa2015...

  .. own made.

  But I can use this file. The application crashes and get this error from the java console:

  network: connection http://myluism-pc:7001/forms/lservlet; jsessionid = p98GTL5Fh6XnQcykySBhLWq2823HwHlPGZ16TYHVv93006N4mmdl!-947562687 with proxy = LIVE

  network: connection http://myluism-PC:7001 / with proxy = LIVE

  Exception in thread "AWT-EventQueue-3" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: oracle/ewt/laf/basic/SelColorChange

  at oracle.ewt.laf.oracle.OracleTreeUI.createItemPainter (unknown Source)

  at oracle.ewt.laf.basic.BasicTreeUI._getItemPainter (unknown Source)

  at oracle.ewt.laf.basic.BasicTreeUI.getItemPainter (unknown Source)

  at oracle.ewt.dTree.DTreeBaseItem.getSize (unknown Source)

  at oracle.ewt.dTree.DTree.paintCanvasInterior (unknown Source)

  at oracle.ewt.EwtComponent.paintInterior (unknown Source)

  at oracle.ewt.lwAWT.SharedPainter._paintInterior (unknown Source)

  at oracle.ewt.lwAWT.SharedPainter.paintExtents (unknown Source)

  at oracle.ewt.lwAWT.LWComponent._paintComponent (unknown Source)

  at oracle.ewt.lwAWT.LWComponent.paint (unknown Source)

  at oracle.ewt.EwtComponent.paint (unknown Source)

  at oracle.ewt.lwAWT.SharedPainter.paintExtents (unknown Source)

  at oracle.ewt.lwAWT.LWComponent._paintComponent (unknown Source)

  This used to be a very simple procedure, but it has stopped working...!

  Don't know if the jar file is well born, or if it is corrupt.

  I can't start my application.

  Help, please!

  Best regards, Luis.

  Try again with the JRE 7 10 update, I get a problem with the update of JRE 7 45, but when I tried the update of JRE 7 10, it works fine.

  For the objective test, disable the check

  Java Panel-> advance-> mixed Code-> disable verification (unchecked)

• Code signing certificate renewal problem

  We recently renewed our Verisign code signing certificate, only to find out that it breaks the process of automatic update with the notorious error "this application cannot be installed because this installer has been misconfigured." We were able to make it work using the ADT-migrate command. It's all good and wonderful. But there are two issues I see. First of all, there is a limit of 180 days, beyond which users is no longer updated. Then, when our certificate gets renewed next year, we could be stuck in a situation where we have to choose which users get to update and who are orphaned and are forced to uninstall/re-install.

  Also, how much of this we have to live with the pain becomes a function of how long a certificate we are willing to pay for. If we are a small company of doubling money for a year 3 certificate could be painless. Why should that be a factor? Why is it not simple to renew the same certificate and have facilities at the beginning of time be well with him?

  Maybe there's something about the renewal process which is not fair. However, when I renewed my cert of Verisign that their process fairly well got me to keep everything about the renewed cert, identical to the original, otherwise it would not be a "renewal."

  If there is something arcane we miss them I'd appreciate it more for what it is. It shouldn't be this difficult.

  Thank you

  Kevin

  Hey Kevin,

  I asked around and learned that the process you describe is "as planned."  However, there are strategies to minimize the disadvantages.

  For more information, please see the following documents:

  AIR 2.6 periods Migration Signature Grace

  Update strategies for changing certificates

  Regularly update your Applications

  Code singing in Adobe AIR

  Hope this helps,

  Chris

• TLS fails on linux self-signed certificates

  on firefox 38.1.0 under centOS 6.6 I have some problem with TLS.

  When it first happened I re fact cert using keys of 2048 bytes. It seemed if address the issue when you navigate to similar addresses to https://localhost/somesite, however, I have try https://localhost:10000 with the fact that it still fails:

  An error occurred during a connection to localhost.localdomain:10000. The certificate server included a public key which was too low. (Error code: ssl_error_weak_server_cert_key)

     The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the authenticity of the received data could not be verified.
     Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem.
  

  The signing certificate is algorithim-> PKCS #1 SHA-1 with RSA encryption

  The algorithim public key is-> PKCS #1 RSA encryption

  The key has been creating 07/06/15 for a period of 10 years is a Version 1 cert issued by myself with the info
  E = [email protected]
  CN = localhost
  UO = hq
  O = permite
  L = Stone Mountain
  ST = ga
  C = us

  It was a problem of webmin.

  To fix this /etc/webmin/miniserv.pem edition replace the cert and private key sections.

  Use a new generated key and self-signed certificate. If you follow the instructions of centOS, the location of the files are /etc/pki/tls/private/ca.key and /etc/pki/tls/certs/ca.crt

• I have a Proxy Server that uses a self-signed certificate, and I can't accept this certificate from Firefox

  I have Firefox installed 37.0.1 on OpenSuse 13.2. I have a proxy server that uses a self-signed certificate, and I tried to add my certificate to the list of authorities and to check all the option displayed to be wz trust no chance.

  I tried to restart firefox, but it did not help.

  I did the same steps in chrome and it works fine.

  appreciate any help.

  After removing my .mozilla in my home directory. Add the certificate to the list of authorities in fact work.

• WPA2 Enterprise signed vs self-signed certificate

  Hello

  What are the risks by using a self-signed certificate on an OS X Server RADIUS client using WPA2-Enterprise?

  The biggest risk is teaching your users to ignore certificate warnings.  But tell all to ignore your warnings cert will be likely to train people to ignore all the warnings, possibly opening security threats.  For non-technical users, it's a bad habit to enforce.

  The cost of a valid certificate is not terrible.  If you have decided to build a wireless infrastructure secure by using certificates and RADIUS, buy a real certificate.  I hope this helps.

  Reid

  Apple Consultants Network

  Author - "El Capitan Server - Foundation Services.

  Author - "El Capitan Server - Collaboration & control»

  Author - "El Capitan Server - Advanced Services '.

  : IBooks exclusively available in Apple store

• RealTek HD Audio driver "stdriver64.sys" not digitally signed, and update returns the message "everything is up-to-date.

  Hello

  Recently, I checked my RealTek HD Audio drivers and found that the "stdriver64.sys" driver is not digitally signed.  It can be connected to a crash problem that I have known for two weeks now, so I try to update all the drivers and see if it will solve this problem.  When I click on update drivers for RealTek HD Audio, a message returned quickly saying that all drivers are up-to-date.  But again controlled the pilot "stdriver64.sys" shows that it is not digitally signed.  Is there another way to update this driver or another way to take with this?  Thank you for your help.

  Preston

  * original title - RealTek HD Audio driver "stdriver64.sys" not digitally signed and update returns message "everything is up-to-date. How can I solve this? *

  Go to the website of the manufacturer of your computer/laptop > drivers and downloads Section > key in your model number > look for the latest Vista drivers > download/install them.

  See you soon.

  Mick Murphy - Microsoft partner

• Understand how KB2813430 works (Windows 7 certificate Updater)

  Microsoft has published a newsletter on Dell certificates that need to be blocked to use in their https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/security/3119884.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396notice.  I have confirmed on 24 November, we have version applied to systems as we have things the installer for update by installing some KB2813430 in the past.  But I'm curious to know if we should also expect to see the certificates of Dell as untrusted certificates?  (We do not these as Untrusted and there never exist in the first place on our systems as far as I KNOW because we create our versions of media from Microsoft rather than using the original image).

  Can anyone shed some light on when you should see a certificate not approved in the certificate store (certmgr.msc)?

  Hello Eddie,

  Thank you for visiting Microsoft Community and we provide a detailed description of the issue.

  According to the description, I understand that you want to know how Windows 7 certificate Updater works on the system.

  Certainly, I understand your concern and will try my best to help you.

  I suggest to read the articles below and check if that helps.

  http://www.Microsoft.com/en-US/Download/details.aspx?ID=39115

  Certificates: Frequently asked questions

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/Certificate-FAQ#1TC=Windows-7

  I hope this information is useful.

  Please let us know if you need more help, we will be happy to help you.

  Thank you.

• QNXStageWebView and self-signed certificates

  I use the QNXStageWebView control to load HTML pages in my AIR application. I'm testing with OS version 1.0.7.3133 and version 2.7 AIR and Tablet OS SDK 1.1.0.  When I use https and try to access a web site that uses a self-signed certificate (which is not approved on the device), the object of QNXStageWebView does not throw error events. How can I detect that the user tries to access a unreliable website and warn (as the native browser)? I saw the newspapers of Wireshark and I see an error "the handshake failed".

  Hello Kiran,

  After further investigation, the dialog box for the certificate that is popped up by the WebKit is made under the covers. The issue which is seen is actually a bug in sdk. However the bug has been fixed and the fix will be available in the next version of the blackberry Tablet sdk.

  Let me know if you have any questions, and I'll be happy to answer them for you.

• Create safer self-signed certificates on IOS router?

  I use a router in 1921 and use partially as an AnyConnect (WebVPN) server for remote access in the location.  The certificate I used was a self-signed certificate & trustpoint generated on the router.  I am running as the last IOS available track to ensure that it has all the latest features.

  Do a quick check of SSL against her of Qualys, he seems to have a lot of weaknesses and known vulnerabilities.

  * Poodle TLS

  * TLS 1.0 only

  * SHA1

  * Diffie-Hellman 1024 bits

  * Some algorithms of older encryption which seem to be available (but I've never specified), as TLS RC4_128_MD5

  The encryption mechanism and controls to create the cert don't give me much choice in the matter.

  Is there a new or better way to create a more secure certificate chain on an IOS router?  I couldn't find the instructions anywhere.

  Robert

  Take a look at my guide to private networks virtual Suite-B.  It creates more secure certificates.  Note my comment about the minimum software version to use.

  https://www.IFM.NET.nz/cookbooks/Cisco-IOS-router-IKEv2-AnyConnect-Suite-B-crypto.html

• Self-signed certificates Z10 blackBerry

  I try to lateral load of the self-signed certificates on the device for testing of the reasons (see various other misfortunes listed elsewhere).  Settings > Security > certificates he seems to have the ability to do.  I can't find any documentation as to where certificates must be located to be detected.

  Some research on Google mentioned something about the process in which concerns the PlayBook, but that requires that they be placed in the Cert folder on the device.  The Z10 is not this standard file and it is not possible (AFAIK) to create this folder at the root of the device.

  Thank you

  The Z10 has the same Cert folder in the same location as the PlayBook, and the installation of a certificate process is the same, so documentation on who should serve you well.

  The folder is visible through network sharing, when you turn on sharing in the settings and display from a PC on your network... in case it wasn't clear.