OpenSSL WALNUT

Dear community,

is there an OSX Server version using a version of openssl which is not vulnerable to attack DROWN (TLS 1.2)?

https://drownattack.com/#check

Thanks in advance!

For what its worth OS X Server uses Apache, if you follow the link to read the information about Apache and this number you will see Apache 2.4.x and later are supposed to be not affected.

OS X Yosemite and El Capitan using versions of Apache that are 2.4.x or later, so in theory are not affected. Mavericks uses Apache 2.2.x and likely to be affected.

Follow these steps in Terminal.app to know the version of Apache that you have.

httpd - v

Tags: Servers and Enterprise Software

Similar Questions

  • Question of vulnerability OpenSSL WALNUT

    Microsoft releases any patches for OpenSSL WALNUT cause of vulnerability

    Hello

    I suggest you post your query in the following TechNet forums to improve assistance in this regard.

    https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/Windows/en-us/home

    Thank you.

  • Excite Pro AT10LE-A108 - Android update for several issues of OpenSSL

    Fortunately more Android version avoids the bug of software, but there is a new raft of bugs that Android is vulnerable to the:

    http://www.eWEEK.com/security/OpenSSL-finds-and-fixes-7-new-security-flaws.html

    Is there a plan to fix the latter with an update?
    Of course, it would take some time, because I think that the latest version of Android 4.4.3 is still vulnerable.

    Clearly Toshiba will know a lot more about details.

    > Is there any plan to fix the latter with an update?
    Since this is a user to user community, I put t think someone will be able to provide more information on these updates or patches.

    > Of course it would take a long time, because I think that the latest version of Android 4.4.3 is still vulnerable.
    From my point of view of a few such bugs should be fixed by google android developers...
    Just Tablet manufacturers add some special software features and customize the Android system for hardware built into the smartphone and tablet devices.

  • Incompatibility of logging postfix in OpenSSL versions after the server upgrade

    In my postfix logs, I get:

    "WARNING: Library Runtime vs. compile header version mismatch: OpenSSL 2.0.0 is not compatible with OpenSSL 0.9.8.

    When smtp or smtpd connections are attempted. It is true that it is only a warning and the connection goes ahead, but someone has an idea where can be found the error?

    This has happened only since the update of my Mac Mini (used as home to 10.11.4 Server) and Server 5.1!

    I'm seeing this too. So far there is no sequel, and I don't think it will be one question (other than the warning message). I doubt that this can be corrected without re - compile Postfix against the correct library/header. Will examine however.

  • Import a CA certificate file created with OpenSSL

    I am trying to import a CA file, I created with the CA.sh of OpenSSL utility. Firefox does not see as valid well: when I try and import the cacert.pem I get the error "is not a certificate authority certificate, so it cannot be imported into the certificate authority list.
    I tried to delete all the text before - START CERTIFICATE - but it does not help.
    What Miss me?

    Maybe try here: http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.tech.crypto?lnk=

  • Updated HP Device Manager 4.6 SP3 (OpenSSL vulnerability)

    Hey!

    I installed the HP Device Manager 4.6 SP3 Upgrade and our resident shows Vulnerability Scanner that uses the Version of OpenSSL is vulnerable.

    Ssleay32.dll and libeay23.dll details yet also show they are version 0.9.8.24 and not 1.0.1i...

    I did all this trouble during the upgrade?

    I tried the process of installation/upgrade on 3 different machines now, and the version of the same thing on all the settings...

    All boards

    Thank you!

    Georg

    Hi, George,

    There is nothing wrong with your update. Update libssl was not included in SP3. Please go with service pack4 released 27 October for this security update.

    Concerning

    -Chen

  • Linksys Smart Wi - Fi is vulnerable to the heart bleed OpenSSL

    I'm curious to know if the Linksys Smart Wi - Fi site or routers are vulnerable to the exploit of heart bleed OpenSSL?

    http://SiliconANGLE.com/blog/2014/04/08/OpenSSL-heartbleed-vulnerability-may-affect-millions/

    BTW: Change your passwords...

    FW_LICENSE_EA4500_v2.1.39.145204 - 3 - RainCAP_n.html construction

  • MITM Dell idrac openssl vulnerability

    Hello

    Nessus allows us to analyze our network. My most recent scan reports several openssl vulnerabilitis with a cvss score of 9.3, (note: HIGH), see below for more details. Found products are affected:

    Reference Dell idrac6 1.97

    Dell idrac7 1.57.57

    Nessus says that the possibility is confirmed, and the openssl version could also be vulnerable to the other openssl release questions the same day as the OpenSSL ' ChangeCipherSpec' MiTM vulnerability"released on June 5.

    If this is confirmed by dell? patches will be released for this fault?

    CVE-2010-5298, CVE-2014-0076, CVE-2014-0195, CVE-2014-0198, CVE-2014-0221, CVE-2014-0224, CVE-2014-3470

    Here's what I received the answer from Dell to the Openssl vulnerability.

    After a few calls to the help desk here is what I get for my iDRAC7 fighting flag of Foundstone security for vulnerability CVE-2014-0224scans:

    "The package OPEN SSL used here contains several components, you do not use the component that is vulnerable and affected, other components in this package are used but are not vulnerable".

    "Dell has determined that the products listed in the attached document are not affected by the problems.  Some products generated a module OpenSSL older (but not vulnerable).  This could be marked by a scanner.  "Dell is currently working to update the modules on a version that will not be reported for these issues.

    I also tried to download the document, I hope I can be read or downloaded.

    If this post has helped you please note.

    Thank you

    2376.Dell - ResponseOpenSSLSecurityAdvisory_05_June_2014_final.pdf

  • iDRAC6 1.98 openssl version

    Hello, we are looking to correct vulnerabilities in openssl on iDRAC6 and improved to 1.98 can you please advise if 1.98 fixed below vulnerabilities so we can get openssl version used in 1.98 thanks

    CVE-2014-0224,CVE-2014-0221,CVE-2014-0195,CVE-2014-0198,CVE-2010-5298,CVE-2014-3470,CVE-2014-0076

    Vrrv,

    1.98 has indeed addressed some of those vulnerabilities in OpenSSL, where 1.99 addressed the rest. As you can read the description of the software update. You can find the 1.99 download here. Run the updates and it should be covered.

    Let me know how it goes.

  • OpenSSL cascading

    Hello

    I try to use OpenSSL in my application of cascades. I added the openSSL library by "configure-> Add library-> library of Platform Standard BB ' then selecting openSSL. After that, I followed the instructions of the cheat to change the .pro file.

    But the problem comes when I compile my app with openSSL code, for example when I try to create a new RSA key I got the following compaling error:

    C:\bbndk\host_10_0_9_284\win32\x86\usr\bin\ntoarm-ld: note: 'RSA_new' is defined in DSO C:/bbndk/target_10_0_9_1101/qnx6/armle-v7/usr/lib/libcrypto.so.2 so try adding it to the linker command line
    C:/bbndk/target_10_0_9_1101/qnx6/armle-v7/usr/lib/libcrypto.so.2: could not read symbols: Invalid operation
    

    I'm using openSSL because I have the experience and the same code is used in the application for windows. So I wouldn't take me long to use in BB10. So if someone knows how to use OpenSSL in a BB10, please help me!

    Thank you in advance.

    OK, I fixed it add in the .pro file:

    LIBS += -lcrypto
    
  • OpenSSL needs the upgrade on the CV

    Discovered today that the version of OpenSSL in firmware x 6 VCS is 1.0.0b. Had problems using OpenSSL to get the 3 parts of the certificate, he produced only the private key. The server ca using a newer version of the RSA/DH Microsoft Windows 2008 R2 OCS provider and found that OpenSSL 1.0.0b cannot read them. I have run the same commands on a separate Linux platform using OpenSSL 1.0.0d and this has generated the expected pem file.

    I would recommend the look of Cisco OpenSSL upgraded in the next version of the firmware as I ran to my cock for hours on this one!

    Sent by Cisco Support technique iPad App

    Hi David,

    This is a known issue (reference 86671 bug) and is dealt with in a later version of the VCS software. To my knowledge, the reason for the VCS do not convert the .pfx .pem file is the instance of OpenSSL on the VCS does not support the RC2 encryption using the .pfx file.

    The workaround is to use an OpenSSL installation outside, as you did.

    Kind regards

    Andreas

  • X7.2.3 VCS OpenSSL vulnerability

    Hi all

    CSCuo16472 (https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuo16472), we see that the vulnerability is fixed in X7.2.3 and X8.1.1.

    But in X7.2.3 covering memo, we cannot find any description about it. (In X8.1.1 we can find it).

    It's really fixed in X7.2.3?

    Best regards

    Kotaro

    Yes, it is set at X7.2.3 - it is mentioned very briefly buried on page 49 of the release notes where it says that it uses OpenSSL 1.0.1c patched for CVE-2014-0160.

  • OpenSSL only way to get WLC CSR?

    Hello

    I am running Windows 8.1 and not having luck with OpenSSL. Are there other ways to generate a CSR for a cert of auth WLC 5508 web?

    Thank you.

    I've always used OpenSSL v9.8 light and never had any problems. You can always use another method to generate a CSR, but you must convert the cert that they supply to a pem. There are online conversions, but for me it's more complicated.

    Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App

  • Release date for VCS x8.2.1 to fix several bugs of OpenSSL (CSCup25151)

    Hi all

    We are offshore on the endless power level and patch the path with the imminent release of the x8.2.1 to fix another bug in OpenSSL (among others) which are potentially more dangerous than the question of the HeartBleed of a few months back. Notice of Cisco was sent near earlier (18/07/2014), which suggests that CSCup25151 of bug will be fixed in x8.2.1. I just check the download site and it doesn't seem to be available yet. Any idea on when this might be?

    I wonder also if additional fixes will be needed for the C/SX CODECs (and other), the line TC of the software running. As far as I can see, bug reference CSCup25163 covers some of these issues in the TC7.1.4 version (already out) but I'm assuming that another rejection would be next - or make any remaining issues of OpenSSL (listed for VCS above) does not affect the line of code TC?

    See you soon

    Chris

    Published today. On 31 July.

    http://software.Cisco.com/download/release.html?mdfid=283733603&flowid=46003&softwareid=280886992&release=x8.2.1&relind=available&rellifecycle=&RelType=latest

  • OpenSSL with 'Cisco VCS Certificate Creation and use - deployment guide. "

    Hi team,

    To prevent users to log on with the VCS Highway, we want to use OpenSSL (version: 1.0.1p 9 julio 2015), but I am facing the following problem:

    1 - I can't implement the command "touch index.txt".

    2 - I can´t implement the command "openssl genrsa-aes256-out private/cakey.pem 4096"; and when I apply these commands I get "OpenSSL is not recognized.

    I did all the steps that says "VCS certificate creation and use Cisco".

    What could be the matter?

    Thanks for your advice.

    Kind regards

    Bill

    Already explained why touch does not, simply create the .txt through windows command file.

Maybe you are looking for