iDRAC6 1.98 openssl version

Similar Questions

• Incompatibility of logging postfix in OpenSSL versions after the server upgrade

  In my postfix logs, I get:

  "WARNING: Library Runtime vs. compile header version mismatch: OpenSSL 2.0.0 is not compatible with OpenSSL 0.9.8.

  When smtp or smtpd connections are attempted. It is true that it is only a warning and the connection goes ahead, but someone has an idea where can be found the error?

  This has happened only since the update of my Mac Mini (used as home to 10.11.4 Server) and Server 5.1!

  I'm seeing this too. So far there is no sequel, and I don't think it will be one question (other than the warning message). I doubt that this can be corrected without re - compile Postfix against the correct library/header. Will examine however.

• MITM Dell idrac openssl vulnerability

  Hello

  Nessus allows us to analyze our network. My most recent scan reports several openssl vulnerabilitis with a cvss score of 9.3, (note: HIGH), see below for more details. Found products are affected:

  Reference Dell idrac6 1.97

  Dell idrac7 1.57.57

  Nessus says that the possibility is confirmed, and the openssl version could also be vulnerable to the other openssl release questions the same day as the OpenSSL ' ChangeCipherSpec' MiTM vulnerability"released on June 5.

  If this is confirmed by dell? patches will be released for this fault?

  CVE-2010-5298, CVE-2014-0076, CVE-2014-0195, CVE-2014-0198, CVE-2014-0221, CVE-2014-0224, CVE-2014-3470

  Here's what I received the answer from Dell to the Openssl vulnerability.

  After a few calls to the help desk here is what I get for my iDRAC7 fighting flag of Foundstone security for vulnerability CVE-2014-0224scans:

  "The package OPEN SSL used here contains several components, you do not use the component that is vulnerable and affected, other components in this package are used but are not vulnerable".

  "Dell has determined that the products listed in the attached document are not affected by the problems.  Some products generated a module OpenSSL older (but not vulnerable).  This could be marked by a scanner.  "Dell is currently working to update the modules on a version that will not be reported for these issues.

  I also tried to download the document, I hope I can be read or downloaded.

  If this post has helped you please note.

  Thank you

  2376.Dell - ResponseOpenSSLSecurityAdvisory_05_June_2014_final.pdf

• OpenSSL with 'Cisco VCS Certificate Creation and use - deployment guide. "

  Hi team,

  To prevent users to log on with the VCS Highway, we want to use OpenSSL (version: 1.0.1p 9 julio 2015), but I am facing the following problem:

  1 - I can't implement the command "touch index.txt".

  2 - I can´t implement the command "openssl genrsa-aes256-out private/cakey.pem 4096"; and when I apply these commands I get "OpenSSL is not recognized.

  I did all the steps that says "VCS certificate creation and use Cisco".

  What could be the matter?

  Thanks for your advice.

  Kind regards

  Bill

  Already explained why touch does not, simply create the .txt through windows command file.

• OpenSSL Powershell script

  someone at - it script PowerCLI for the OpenSSL version for each host on a Virtual Center

  So I suggest you try plink.exe from the PuTTY suite

  Once the SSH is open, just run the same command that I gave above.

  Alan has some tips on using plink.exe

• OpenSSL vulnerability software

  I see a lot of news based on the alias of OpenSSL software vulnerability.

  For more information:

  http://www.ZDNet.com/heartbleed-serious-OpenSSL-zero-day-vulnerability-revealed-7000028166/

  security - software: what is and what are the options to mitigate? -Server fault

  https://blog.cloudflare.com/staying-ahead-of-OpenSSL-vulnerabilities

  https://Web.NVD.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2014-0160

  I did some searching but can't find any relationship with VMware/ESXi

  My question is this also influences the environment vSphere somehow?

  I hope that VMware will soon release a notice of security clear things and providing updates to this horrible problem (which is not their fault).

  The openssl software bug seems to affect ESXi as well. Virtual appliances based on recent Linux as the VCSA, vMA, etc. may be vulnerable too:

  Which versions of OpenSSL are affected?

  Status of different versions:

     OpenSSL 1.0.1 through 1.0.1f (included) are vulnerable

  1.0.1g OpenSSL is NOT vulnerable

  OpenSSL 1.0.0 branch is NOT vulnerable

  OpenSSL 0.9.8 branch is NOT vulnerable

  Bug was introduced in OpenSSL in December 2011 and has been in the wild since OpenSSL version 1.0.1 March 14, 2012. Published April 7, 2014 1.0.1g OpenSSL fixes the bug

  Let's take a look at a host of ESXi 5.5 GA (no U1):

  # vmware - vl

  VMware ESXi 5.5.0 build-1331820

  VMware ESXi 5.5.0 GA

  
  

  # OpenSSL version-

  OpenSSL 1.0.1e February 11, 2013

  built: kills Feb 26 16:34:26 PST 2013

  Now, here's a 5.1 U2 to update ESXi host:

  # vmware - vl

  VMware ESXi 5.1.0 build-1612806

  Updating VMware ESXi 5.1.0 2

  
  

  ~ # OpenSSL version -

  OpenSSL 0.9.8y 5 February 2013

  built: Fri Mar 20 20:44:08 CDT 2013

  As you can see, ESXi 5.5 runs the branch vulnerable openssl 1.0.1. ESXi 5.1 U2 also uses the openssl 0.9.8 branch. So versions prior to ESXi 5.5 should be affected.

  I have a virtual appliance of older vMA 5.1 which is unchanged, as well:

  # cat/etc/vma-release

  vMA 5.1.0 BUILD-1062361

  # cat/etc/SuSE - release

  SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (x86_64)

  VERSION = 11

  PATCHLEVEL = 2

  # OpenSSL version-

  OpenSSL 1.0.0c December 2, 2010

  At least the vCenter non Inventory Service seems to depend on the openssl library as well:

  A 5.1 vCenter U2 seems of course:

  "C:\Program Files\VMware\Infrastructure\Inventory Service\bin\openssl.exe" version - a

  OpenSSL 0.9.8y 5 February 2013

  built: Thu Feb 12 23:38:08 2013

  There are two binary openssl on a test vCenter 5.5 GA of mine, one of them having a vulnerable version:

  "C:\Program Files\VMware\CIS\openSSL\openssl.exe" version - a

  OpenSSL 1.0.1e February 11, 2013

  built: Thu Feb 12 19:37:08 2013

  "C:\Program Files\VMware\Infrastructure\Inventory Service\bin\openssl.exe" version - a

  OpenSSL 0.9.8y 5 February 2013

  built: Thu Feb 12 23:38:08 2013

• low key public ephemeral Diffie-Hellman in vCenter Assistant support 6.0.0.0 Build 2632669

  I have install the vCenter Assistant support, no problem. But when I used Chrome (v47) to access it, I had a small "Ephemeral DH public key" error I tried to give him a certificate signed by our Windows 2008 R2 Enterprise internal CA, but not joy. IE will not work, but Chrome. What can I do to get rid of this error blocking (in addition to switch to IE, which is not a good solution)? I saw a note to update some files server.xml in VCOrchestrator to the same question, but I can't find a comparable file on the device to support Asst. As far as I can tell, our CA used a model that uses the Microsoft Enhanced RSA and AES Cryptographic Provider, sha256, 2048-bit keys - what is weak on this subject? What did I miss?

  Someone at - it ideas?

  I would love to see a response from the support, but I think that the only option is to wait for an update of the device.  I did a little research and it looks like a problem with the OpenSSL version delivered with SLES 11.  OpenSSL v0.9.8 does not support TLS 1.1 or 1.2 (TLS 1.2 - SUSA Blog |) The communities of SUSE) and there is no simple mechanism was updated to the version within the unit. No matter what kind of cert you put on the system, he will always support the resulting weak encryption methods Chrome report the site.  I tried to limit the list of encryption algorithms to only ECDHE, but Chrome still did not like it.

• Advanced of environment VMware vSphere, Esxi 5.5

  Amigos,

  Hoy estoy again the comunidad publicando post para buscar UN knew consejo y experiencia en VMware, el tema hoy are the advanced of una environment in una plataforma VMware vSphere a c the tabla that take the environment as sebo corregir:

  Assets	Trend	Assets
  VMware ESXi 5.5.0 Build 1331820	Vuln	via the ssl Protocol

  Against a respond of problemas mi sort el KB (2076665) of VMware pero este habla no estoy seguro TR este o los KB dries alli sugeridas son los correct esta environment expuesta in tabla anterior, ahora reach a ser este KB el correcto than tiendo as debo hacer lo are:

  1 Descargar los patches 'ESXi550-201404001'y'ESXi550-201404020'.

  2 Subirlos a VMware Update Manager para con esta posteriormente instalarlos in los host.

  3 el orden para los patches apply are "ESXi550-201404020" Primero y luego "ESXi550-201404001".

  4 Reiniciar el host y corregida the environment would be.

  Note: también me indican no delpierre fornuis has version VMware vSphere 5.5 U1 lo contrario is a the environment encontrarme y tendría than corregirla again.

  Dudas:

  1 Este so are el KB correcto para correcion of the environment?

  2 Esta TR are training (orden) to apply los patches?

  3. are cierto no delpierre fornuis has version 5.5 U1?

  Of photos gracias por su colaboracion acostumbrada tan.

  Te refieres has the environment of software of Open SSL reciente. Answering intento a tus dudas.

  Runs following comandos y dime if the version of ESXi e tienes informs are certainly the're (5.5.0 1331820). If so esa version is bajo the environment:

  # vmware - vl

  VMware ESXi 5.5.0 build-1331820

  VMware ESXi 5.5.0 GA

  
  

  OpenSSL 1.0.1 through 1.0.1f (included) are vulnerable

  Ahora el comando siguiente para ver the version of Open SSL runs there if sale you esta version, estas in riesgo:

  
  

  # OpenSSL version-

  OpenSSL 1.0.1e February 11, 2013

  built: kills Feb 26 16:34:26 PST 2013

  
  

  In fact, if you appears otra SSL version ten in a hotel that also can be vulnerable. Son todas las versiones 1.01 has the 1.0.1f. ASI del example, than ESXi 5.5 seria para el. build 1331820, veras are the 1.01e y por lo tanto tiene el problema.

  Sabido esto entonces you respondo a tus dudas:

  1) if, el KB than indicas soluciona el problema of the software environment.

  VMware KB: Solve OpenSSL software for ESXi 5.5 - CVE - 2014 - 0160

  2) if, el orden instalacion los parches of that el are.

  Not continue TR cerebro VMware Update Manager (desconozco if lo tienes wont y configurado), are themselves encargara descargar los parches internet host el y tenerlos in vCenter would para ser desplegados in el el. Además VMware Update Manager hara el instalacion than sea preciso orden.

  Te recommend that cuando tengas a rato arrows UN ojo a Update Manager y prueba alguna do. Te gustara.

  The ECHA UN ojo al siguiente article: patch ESXi 5.5 for software without having to install the update 1 | Insider - Articles from VMware VMware support

  3) I have understood that if U1 tambien esta afectado.

  The ECHA UN ojo al siguiente KB from VMware that recently Público para indicate what su propiedad por esa environment affected only productos: VMware KB: response to OpenSSL security issue CVE-2014-0160/CVE-2014-0346 a.k.a: "Heartbleed"

  Are no tell.

  Saludos.

• What version of openssl and libcurl to use?

  We are Member of the VMware TAP alliance and so are bulking VDDK components with our linux application. But since

  our application also needs to dynamically bind with openssl and libcurl (for other reasons) I do not know what exact version of openssl and libcurl

  to use. We want to build libcurl and openssl source, also want to know what options to build should be used for the same, that we

  you want to collect only one pair of openssl and libcurl with our application libraries. Any help/ideas in this direction will be appreciated.

  Hello

  If there are patches for the opensource libs, we will keep the patches in 'Open Source' download VDDK downloads section. Otherwise, the procedure of compiler options is the same as that recommended by the package open source.

  I guess you want to build for debugging/internal purposes and redistribute to those you get with VDDK, is that correct?

  HTH,

  Annick

• The OpenSSL software patches have rolled to all the latest full versions 5.5?

  This should be easy, even if I can't find anything definitive on the vmware site.

  Thank you!

  Ron

  Yes, software fixes have been made to ESXi 5.5. Reference kB - http://kb.vmware.com/kb/2076665

• Are all versions of Firefox susceptable to software bug CVE-2014-0160?

  All versions of Firefox are using OpenSSL?
  If so, what versions of Firefox are vulnerable to the bug software CVE-2014-0160-who has recently been identified.
  As stated in:
  http://heartbleed.com/
  http://arstechnica.com/security/2014/04/critical-crypto-bug-in-OpenSSL-opens-two-thirds-of-the-Web-to-eavesdropping/

  Hello pjhill, not firefox (the browser) is not affected by this vulnerability, but were two mozilla web services (firefox accounts, persona): https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2014/04/08/heartbleed-security-advisory/

• Excite Pro AT10LE-A108 - Android update for several issues of OpenSSL

  Fortunately more Android version avoids the bug of software, but there is a new raft of bugs that Android is vulnerable to the:

  http://www.eWEEK.com/security/OpenSSL-finds-and-fixes-7-new-security-flaws.html

  Is there a plan to fix the latter with an update?
  Of course, it would take some time, because I think that the latest version of Android 4.4.3 is still vulnerable.

  Clearly Toshiba will know a lot more about details.

  > Is there any plan to fix the latter with an update?
  Since this is a user to user community, I put t think someone will be able to provide more information on these updates or patches.

  > Of course it would take a long time, because I think that the latest version of Android 4.4.3 is still vulnerable.
  From my point of view of a few such bugs should be fixed by google android developers...
  Just Tablet manufacturers add some special software features and customize the Android system for hardware built into the smartphone and tablet devices.

• OpenSSL WALNUT

  Dear community,

  is there an OSX Server version using a version of openssl which is not vulnerable to attack DROWN (TLS 1.2)?

  https://drownattack.com/#check

  Thanks in advance!

  For what its worth OS X Server uses Apache, if you follow the link to read the information about Apache and this number you will see Apache 2.4.x and later are supposed to be not affected.

  OS X Yosemite and El Capitan using versions of Apache that are 2.4.x or later, so in theory are not affected. Mavericks uses Apache 2.2.x and likely to be affected.

  Follow these steps in Terminal.app to know the version of Apache that you have.

  httpd - v

• Updated HP Device Manager 4.6 SP3 (OpenSSL vulnerability)

  Hey!

  I installed the HP Device Manager 4.6 SP3 Upgrade and our resident shows Vulnerability Scanner that uses the Version of OpenSSL is vulnerable.

  Ssleay32.dll and libeay23.dll details yet also show they are version 0.9.8.24 and not 1.0.1i...

  I did all this trouble during the upgrade?

  I tried the process of installation/upgrade on 3 different machines now, and the version of the same thing on all the settings...

  All boards

  Thank you!

  Georg

  Hi, George,

  There is nothing wrong with your update. Update libssl was not included in SP3. Please go with service pack4 released 27 October for this security update.

  Concerning

  -Chen

• M1000e with M610 Blade. iDRAC6 problems with the upgrade of the firmware 3.50 (Build 4) - "image downloaded missed the check" error

  I have the blade that is a M610. its current 3.30 iDRAC6 Firmware version (Build 17), his version of BIOS is 6.0.7. I am trying to upgrade the firmware to 3.50 iDRAC (Build 4). I am upradging by the MCC on the M1000e chassis. I choose the slot of in that the blade is and then start the IDRAC GUI. I choose firmware update and select the firming.imc file that I used successfully on some other M610 blades. After about 30 seconds, he returned with the following error.

  The uploaded image has no verification

  Why?

  I came across the same problem (with a refurb M610, iDRAC firmware has been 2.20).

  I tried to upgrade the iDRAC6 firmware to 3.60 via the web interface of iDRAC6 and it was a no go.

  I tried several browsers (chrome and firefox) and same problem each time.
  I tried to go to firmware (as shown in the accompanying note) 2.31 instead of 3.60 and same question every time.

  I finally managed to update the firmware of the iDRAC6 by upgrading the web interface M1000e and not in the iDRAC6 web interface.

  It worked the first time (using Chrome).