ORA-01554: simultaneity of transaction limit reached the reason

Similar Questions

• TCP ip has reached the limit of security imposed on the number of tcp simultaneous connect

  Idle process original title: System, create tcp/ip connections to achieve maximum attempts allowed on win xp
  Continue to event viewer showing warning saying tcp/ip has reached the limit of security imposed on the number of tcp connect attempts simultaneous and system idle process, that's what causes this error.  To many connections 127.0.0.1:6999 127.0.0.1:4426 time_wait

  127.0.0.1:4427 TIME_WAIT
  etc etc etc.

  Hello

  Thanks for asking! If I have understood correctly, you receive tcp ip error message has reached the security limit imposed on the number of simultaneous tcp connect in Event Viewer. I suggest you follow the troubleshooting steps to check if this may help.

  1. don't you make changes on the computer before the show?
  2. when exactly do you face the question?
  3. what anti-virus is installed on the computer?

  Method 1:
  It is a warning that a malicious program or a virus can be run on the system. You can run a Microsoft security scanner to make sure that the computer is free from virus infection:
  http://www.Microsoft.com/security/scanner/en-us/default.aspx
  WARNING:
  If you run the antivirus program that is infected by the virus scan will get deleted. Therefore, reinstall the program. Also if the files and folders are affected by the virus, while they might even get deleted

  
  Method 2:
  Check the behavior by starting the computer in a clean boot state. How to configure Windows XP to start in a "clean boot" State
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/310353
  Note: When the diagnosis is complete do not forget to reset the computer to a normal startup. Follow step 7 in the above article.

  Method 3:
  Please close some of the connections (some types of downloads can use multiple connections).

  Check out the link:
  http://www.Microsoft.com/technet/support/ee/transform.aspx?ProdName=Windows+operating+system&ProdVer=5.2&EvtID=4226&EvtSrc=Tcpip&lcid=1033

  Please follow these recommended steps, review the additional information provided and post if you still experience the problem. I'd be happy to help you more

• "You have reached the limit for the reservations authorized by customer.

  I got this error, whatever i use different apple ID. and also another telephone number of her present on ireserve. But if I try to use another type of government identification. This works. I don't know why the apple system can keep to see my id personal Government reach the limit and it should be fine clear every day. I try to call hong kong apple support. but they said they don't have solution and any part can help with my problem. It is quite interesting that they suggested me to use the information for other people to do the ireserve. can anyone help?

  I'm really confused by your question

  You have reached too much supply of iPhone on iReserve and get an error when you try to use a different number of phone or Apple ID, telling you that you have booked too much. So you try to book using a most other Hong Kong Government issued IDS, and it works

  I'm confused on what you need help with

• ORA-29975: cannot save a query in the middle of a transaction active Castle ADF

  Hello

  I use JDeveloper 12.1.3. 64 bit.

  I have a unique feature on FirstEO EO object validator is based:

  public boolean validateSomeThingCheckRule() {}

  Boolean flag = false;

  Set of rows from the rowset = this.getMyVO1 (); / * an accessor to ViewObject MyVO * /.

  rowSet.setRangeSize(-1);

  rowSet.executeQuery (); /
  

  Line myRow = rowSet.first ();

  If (myRow! = null) {}

  .. .do something

  if(Something>0) {}

  flag = true;

  }

  else {}

  flag = false;

  }

  }

  return of flag;

  }

  The validator works well.

  I also Module of Application with java AMImpl class, where I replace before the commit operation:

  @Override

  {} public void beforeCommit (TransactionEvent transactionEvent)

  MyViewObjectImpl firstViewObjectImpl = getFirstVO1 (); / * Raturns FirstVO based on FirstEO * /.

  MyViewRowImpl firstViewRowImpl = (MyViewRowImpl) firstViewObjectImpl.getCurrentRow ();

  Set of rows myRowSet = (all lines) firstViewRowImpl.getAttribute ("MyVO1"); / * an accessor to ViewObject MyVO, as in the EO validator, they have both access same view MyVO object * /.

  MyRow = myRowSet.getRowSet () such () line; / * Here I have: ORA-29975: cannot save a query in the middle of an active transaction Castle * /.

  / * do something...*/

  super.beforeCommit (transactionEvent);

  }

  Can someone explain to me why and help me with the solution. Thx a lot.

  This is probably related to database change notifications.

  Maybe you have enabled auto-refresh on this VO?

  In addition, postings in beforeCommit() method of coding is not very good practice: this is the 'overall' method so it is called for each commit on each page, and in some cases, this method can be called by framework: http://andrejusb.blogspot.ba/2013/03/coding-validation-in-adf-bc-view-object.html

  Dario

• error when the test server - user has reached the limit or the firewall is not blocking. Using Godaddy as a host

  Try to download files on godaddy by Dreamweaver CC 2015.2 - an FTP error occurred - cannot make connection to the host. Maximum number of users reached or not authorized to make the connection because of local firewall blocks FTP data.

  Have turned off windows firewall and other antivirus software. I'm not sure which limit the means reached.

  Help, please

  "Limit reached" means that the disk is full or you have reached the maximum of files you can store on your remote server. If necessary, you will need to remove some files before you can upload more.

• vmkfstools ' cannot open 'exch01_3.vmdk': has reached the limit of the host to open files (40).

  Hello

  We try to restore a virtual Exchange computer from a backup of virtual machine BE files. Download us all files for the data store and inventory of the virtual machine. We got an error when you try to turn on the virtual machine

  Power DevicePowerOn module has failed. Failed to create virtual SCSI devie to scsi0:0.

  VMware technical support has helped/Showed me how to reformat the VMDK using VMKFstools and show in this KB

  http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_us & cmd = displayKC & externalID = 1028943.

  There are 4 disks and disk cloning first 3 succeeded, but the last of them failed with the message "unable to open 'exch01_3.vmdk'. Reached the limit of the host for open files (40).

  The environment is ESXi 4.1.0

  Is there someone out there who knows how I can get this last drive for clone properly?

  Any help is appreciated.

  Thank you

  Craig

  It is probably caused by the block size VMFS for the target data store. In order to allow greater than 512 GB files the size of the block on a VMFS3 data store must be at least 4 MB. You have an another data store with a block size of 4 MB (or 8 MB)? If so, create a folder named on this data store for the hard file and run vmkfstools as target using that store of data/folder.

  André

• Try to change computers, said I reached the activation limit

  I'm tethering to reinstall Creative Suite CS5 on the new computer, but it says I have installs too. I disabled a facility, it is permanently disabled, but the activation on the new laptop window still says that I reached the activation limit.  How can I get Adobe to fix this problem? DN

  Hi Dcn,

  Please follow the link: Contact customer and connect to our chat support team. They can manually disable your activation of your previous computers.

  Thank you

  Yann Arora

• What happens if AUTOEXTEND is turned on and the data file reaches the limit?

  Hello
  
  I m using Oracle 11 g. I created a tablespace by using the following command:
  
  CREATE TABLESPACE MYTABLESPACE
  DATAFILE '< PATH > '.
  SIZE 1 G AUTOEXTEND ON MEASUREMENT OF LOCAL MANAGEMENT AUTOALLOCATE;
  
  
  The data file is almost full. The question is: given that AUTOEXTEND is enabled, a new data file will automatically create the original data file reaches the limit? (data file is PETIT_FICHIER)
  
  
  I would appreciate your help.
  
  
  Thank you

  998043 wrote:
  Hello

  I m using Oracle 11 g. I created a tablespace by using the following command:

  CREATE TABLESPACE MYTABLESPACE
  DATAFILE ''.
  SIZE 1 G AUTOEXTEND ON MEASUREMENT OF LOCAL MANAGEMENT AUTOALLOCATE;

  The data file is almost full. The question is: given that AUTOEXTEND is enabled, a new data file will automatically create the original data file reaches the limit? (data file is PETIT_FICHIER)

  I would appreciate your help.

  Thank you

  File stops growing & error is thrown.

• ORA-14080: partition cannot be split along the specified high limit

  Hi guys,.
  
  I try to divide a new partition MD_PROV_201207, but hit error ORA-14080: partition cannot be split along the specified upper limit.
  My code as below, please help make sure my code is there any problem. Thank you.
  
  ALTER TABLE SPLIT PARTITION abc_201206 table_owner.abc
  AT (TO_DATE ('20120801', 'SYYYYMMDD'))
  INTO (PARTITION tbsp_abc, PARTITION abc_201207 TABLESPACE tbsp_abc TABLESPACE abc_201206);
  
  
  HIGH_VALUE PARTITION_POSITION NOM_PARTITION
  --------------- ------------------------------ --------------- ------------------------- ------------------ ------------------------------
  abc_201203 '20120401' 1
  abc_201204 '20120501' 2
  abc_201205 '20120601' 3
  abc_201206 '20120701' 4
  MAXVALUE DEF 5

  SagiGal wrote:
  Error again.

  ALTER TABLE SPLIT PARTITION DEF table_owner.abc
  AT (TO_DATE ('20120801', 'SYYYYMMDD'))
  IN (PARTITION, PARTITION DEF abc_201207)
  ;

  ERROR on line 1:
  ORA-14080: partition cannot be split along the specified high limit

  Is the partition that I shared is incorrect?

  Seems that you have high bound
  Action: make sure the limit along which a partition is to be shared together
  lower than that of the partition to be sliced and higher than that of a
  partition immediately preceding the one to be split

  See also Metalink
  ORA-14080 during an attempt to split a Partition. [100299.1 ID]

  Osama...

• Cannot run Photoshop, tells me I've reached the limit of Comp 2

  I have installed on two computers Adobe Photshop, now on one of them, I am unable to run Photoshop and get a message telling me that I've reached the limit of two computers and it no longer works and you request an activation code.

  The thing is that it is only installed on these two computers and not any other, could my account have been hacked and installed by someone else? It is a way of "withdrawal" of activation on a remote computer, or at least identify which computers it is installed?

  Thank you

  Hi ubali,.

  Welcome to the community!

  Please contact our Adobe support and they will help you with the activation, check the information of contact here: http://www.adobe.com/support/download-install/supportinfo/

  -Pierre

• ORA-01400: cannot insert NULL into () in the procedure OE_Header_Util package

  Hi Hsawwan,
  
  When you try to save the header in the order form, you will see the following message in R12.
  
  Note
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  ORA-01400: cannot insert NULL in
  ("TO HAVE". "" "" OE_ORDER_HEADERS_ALL '. "" ORDER_NUMBER") in the package OE_Header_Util procedure Insert_Row
  
  
  I followed the Doc-ID 1208783.1 and change the value of the profile Option, OM: Default sale Transaction Phase, NULL or "Fulfillment". and I srt a configuration document for sales orders sequence.
  
  
  Please help me how to solve the problem.
  
  Thank you
  Concerning
  GSM

  Are you connected to the correct responsibility?

  Have you checked if this simultaneous program is added to the application group that is the responsibility?

  Thank you
  Hussein

• The limit of the device must be less than or equal to the limit of life cycle license in first cisco 2.2

  Hi all

  I have seen under error in the tool main 2.2 Cisco infrastructure

  The limit of the device must be less or equal to the limit of license of life cycle and also secondary device ISE inaccessible since premium.

  Could you please suggest how we can solve your problem.

  Thanks in advance...

  Kind regards

  Sachin

  Yes. Life cycle license are by smart device managed. See this page for a good overview:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/cloud-systems-management/Prime...

  .. as well as this page:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/cloud-systems-Managemen...

  .. who States:

  Life cycle license: allows access to all the features of the life cycle, which includes the configuration of the devices, image management software, basic health and performance monitoring, fault management, troubleshooting and customer visibility on the network. The license of the life cycle is based on the number of managed devices. Life cycle of the licenses are available in sizes from package of 25, 50, 100, 500, 1000, 2500, 5000, 10,000 and 15 000 devices and can be combined as needed to reach a total number of device under license.

  A device is uniquely identified through the assigned IP address and system object ID (SysOid). Routers, switches, light/unified access points and network first Cisco (NAMs) analysis Modules are charged on the number of licenses. If a switch stack is managed via a single IP address, it counts as a single device. A single frame will, however, be counted as multiple devices if the chassis is configured with several IP addresses. For example, a switch with several service cards, such as a firewall and so forth, or a stackable switch with an IP address assigned to each switch who is involved in the stack is considered multiple devices within the first Cisco Infrastructure. Cisco Wireless LAN controllers (WLCs), autonomous and peripheral access points third are not counted against the number of licenses.

  When you have more devices that licenses, you will receive the error see you and prevented from adding additional devices to your inventory.

  We see it more often when it is light (i.e. not independent) APs are added to a wireless controller. PI will not prevent the new APs to be added, they are managed under their association with the WLC. However, if you try to add a new switch it would prevent you to do until the deficit of licenses has been sent.

• Transaction aborts after the installation of the ODAC 12 c Release 3

  I have .net code using a transaction scope that works very well using ODAC 11 g Release 4, but does not work, "Failed to register in a distributed transaction" using the ODAC 12 c version 1.2 or 3.  A single database transaction.  I am at a loss for what could be the problem.

  This problem occurs on Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2.

  I spent reviewing logs tracking for distributed by Microsoft Transaction Server and the Oracle Services for Microsoft Transaction Services of.  Tracking MSDTC logs indicate that the abandonment of the transaction was request was received from the calling application ("RECEIVED_ABORT_REQUEST_FROM_BEGINNER").  Tracking ORAMTS logs indicate an error in the OIC, and that there is an attempt to start a transaction distributed with on logon ("OCI_ERROR - 2048.", "ORA-02048: try to start the transaction distributed without logging")

  I can reproduce this error with a simple code with just example tried to insert records into a table.  If I change the data provider for "System.Data.OracleClient" or uninstall 12 c and install 11g this code works very well.

   DataSet1TableAdapters.DataTable1TableAdapter da = new DataSet1TableAdapters.DataTable1TableAdapter();
              
              using (TransactionScope scope = new TransactionScope())
              {
                  Transaction txn = Transaction.Current;
                  try
                  {
  
  
                     da.Insert(0, "This ia a title");
  
  
                      scope.Complete();
                      lblmessage.Text = "Transaction Succeeded.";
                  }
                  catch (Exception ex)
                  {
                      txn.Rollback();
                      lblmessage.Text = "Transaction Failed.";
                  }
  

  Can anyone provide any ideas what is happening?  I really want to use ODAC 12 c.

  Thank you.

  My team has been able to reproduce this problem with DB 10.2.0.3, but not with DB 10.2.0.5. If it is possible, I advise to use 10.2.0.5 If you need an immediate solution.

• Acrobat license limit reached error

  When I built the reference image for our Windows 7 machines, I
  installed Adobe Acrobat 11 with a unique serial number.  In addition, when Acrobat 10 reached the end of support, I improved the many machines 11 Acrobat or Acrobat DC.  When I did I recycled serial numbers as I have
  was in a hurry.  Please note that we
  have, and always have had enough of the serial numbers for the copies of Adobe on our
  systems.  At a certain point in demand
  realized that the serial numbers had been reused and assigned encourage citizens
  of a kick out of the application.
  I went to individual work stations, uninstalled the software, then
  reinstalled ensuring that I used a unique serial number.  (this has been recommended by Adobe support).

  Unfortunately, that did nothing to solve the problem.  I don't know if a registry key is stuck and
  the question or that the case is at the origin.  Any
  assistance can be provided would be great.

  

  Hi chrisw53748869 ,

  Please refer to this article:- Creative Cloud "Of Activation limit reached" or "cannot connect" errors

  Let me know how it goes.

  Kind regards

  Christian

• Transaction management in the ADF Application using Dynamic Shell

  Hi all

  I use Jdev 12.1.2. We have an application built using design pattern of Shell of dynamic user interface where each workflow in the application will open in a separate tab. So my question here relates by using transaction management in the workflow.

  I read in many places where we are asked to avoid always using "start new Transaction" as it would open multiple connection. But I also vaguely remember reading that best practices to use in an application built using by using Dynamic user interface Shell, is to have isolated Datacontrol with always start new Transaction.

  So could indicate the recommended approach for impact Shell of the user interface and the performance of the approach?

  Note: We have just a data control in our application.

  Thanks in advance.

  Hello

  the transaction is not defined by the shell of the dynamic tab but the workflow. The shell of the dynamic tab displays only the workflow at a glance. If you plan to display a single feed task several times as tabs in a dynamic tab shell, each indicating a different set of data, then you use "isolate" scope of data control or "adaptive databinding (https://blogs.oracle.com/groundside/entry/towards_ultra_reusability_for_adf). If you are using remote data controls then - if you use ADF BC - each instance of the workflow (in shell dynamic tab tab) creates its own connection to the base and the transaction. Workflow transaction parameters are passed to it.

  So use case issues: If you only display a single instance of a workflow tasks at once in a tab of the shell of the dynamic tab so that you can use the scope of shared control (default) data without doing anything. I however you must show the same workflow multiple times then reach isolated from control data or link Adaptive is the implementation, you should go for. The first option - data control isolated - is expensive because it creates additional database connections. There if its use cases.

  Frank