Oracle trace files

Similar Questions

• Generation of Oracle Trace files for a session

  Hello
  
  I use oracle 10g (10.2.0.5) in RHEL5 server. I used the instruction exec dbms_system.set_sql_trace_in_session (147,3,TRUE); to draw a particular session. I am able to track successfully, but I created a new table in this session where I'm not able to find any statement of create table in the trace file generated, but I can find the insert statements that I made on the table newly created in the trace file.
  
  Is not recorded in the events of path of the DDL statements?
  
  Kind regards
  
  007

  Salvation;

  Please find below the doc who can help you

  DBMS_SYSTEM. SET_SQL_TRACE_IN_SESSION GENERATES NO TRACE FOR THE SESSION ACTIVE [ID 236178.1]
  How to enable the SQL Trace for all new Sessions [ID 178923.1]

  Follow-up to the Sessions to Oracle using the package DBMS_SUPPORT [ID 62160.1]

  Respect of
  HELIOS

• Directory for the trace file permissions

  Oracle11gR2 64-bit rhel5
  
  Hi all
  
  I was wondering if there is a way to set the permissions on the directories of oracle trace files permanently? All groups and users have been implemented correctly and some users received 777 on some directories, but they always can access new trace files generated. It seems that when oracle generates new trace files, it replaces the permissions set on the directory.
  
  For example, if I put the directory "trace" to 777 all files will be reading/writing/execution. However new files/directories created will be 755 and now are not accessible for some users. It seems that Oracle is something internally or back to the method by default as it set up with. How can I change this behavior?
  
  Thank you.

  Dear JrOraDBA,

  There is a setting in * nix called UMASK. If you export the value of this setting to 777, I guess that the problem will be solved.

  777 means;

  First 7 for the current user
  Second 7 for current user's group
  Third 7 for the other users.
  

  It will be useful,

  Ogan

• not generating the trace for rdf report by oracle apps file

  Hi all
  
  
  in fact, we aim to generate trace file for reports and a convert to text file using tkprof by simultaneous program unix shell script submit using fnd_request.submit_request in another program of concurrent proceedings. but all the reports that are created by using pl/sql generates the trace file, but rdf report does not trace file.
  
  Report generator Oracle 6i is used
  
  Oracle application is 11i
  
  List of measures are being taken to get the trace file are
  1.SRW. USER_EXIT (' FND SRWINIT' "); before the release of report
  2SRW. USER_EXIT ("FND SRWEXIT'"); in after the report
  
  another of the measures which are followed
  SRW.do_sql ("alter session set SQL_TRACE = TRUE'"); before release of the report
  SRW.do_sql ("alter session set SQL_TRACE = FALSE'"); in after the report
  
  above, said steps are done, but still it does not arouse any trace file
  
  same oracle_process is null
  
  Select oracle_process_id from the fnd_concurrent_requests where request_id
  
  ID processOracle for this report oracle rdf file is not generated.
  
  
  Please help me in this issue
  
  Thank you
  
  Published by: 797525 on October 12, 2012 12:43 AM

  Add the following line before the outbreak of report
  SRW. DO_SQL ("alter session set events = tracefile_identifier" trace 10046 name context forever, level 4 "=" REPORT ' ")

  Trace stops automatically when the report closes.

  In addition, what program submits the script fnd_request.submit_request... shell / pl/sql procedure?

  you initialize apps FND_GLOBAL. APPS_INITIALIZE before submit_request of shooting?

  Make a DNF: active Log Debug = Yes and check the table of fnd_log_messages

  See the following MOS docs:
  Oracle 6i [ID 111311.1] follow-up reports
  See you soon,.
  ND
  Use the buttons "useful" or "correct" to award points to the answers.

• Cannot write trace files destined for the bottom dump in oracle 10 g

  Hi all
  
  Version of the OS: RHEL 5.7
  DB version: 10.2.0.4
  cluster: database node 2 RAC
  
  Today I faced a strange behavior for one of our production database. Its a database of 2 rac nodes. There is no automatic generation of trace files in the destination of bottom dump on the first node. I am able to see the second trace files in its context dump dest. But the strange behavior occurs on the first node. I see that alert logfile in the bottom dump dest. Despite an error that displays the generated trace file but no file is located in the bdump. Here is the error, but physically he no trace file is generated:
  

  Errors in file/oracle/db/admin / < sid > /bdump/ < sid >j0011558.trc:
  ORA-12012: error on auto run 94377 work
  ORA-12008: error path refresh materialized view

  can someone have any idea for this strange behavior. There is no script maintenance for the removal of trace files.
  
  Kind regards
  Imran Khan

  its his work after you re-create your synonym then Yes you should not recreate MV again.

• How to disable the trace files in the oracle 11g version

  Senario: trace file grow
  How to disable the trace files in the oracle 11g version
  pls guide with best practices

  NATHALIE wrote:
  Senario: trace file grow
  How to disable the trace files in the oracle 11g version
  pls guide with best practices

  11 g, there is an extended tracing which happens for reasons best known only to Oracle. But if you want to disable, Coskan had published a small ticket mentioning a parameter not documented (which means you should think twice before using it) to disable it - disablehealth_check *. Here you can read the full message,
  http://Coskan.WordPress.com/2009/06/03/too-many-trace_file-on-11g/

  Aman...

• DB Oracle 10.2.0.4 generating a large number of trace file.

  Hi all
  
  We oracle 10.2.0.4 DB running on HP - UX PARISC system.
  Today, I saw this system of file with a binary oracle little drastically increases.
  
  on the descent of the cause, I found that there is generation of trace file every second in the directory BDUMP ranging from 500 KB to 2 MB.
  
  The no files generated today is
  
  $ pwd
  / cbsora1/Ora10g/OraHome1/RDBMS/log/bdump
  $
  $ ls - lrt | grep "Oct 20' | WC-l
  29606
  
  Tried to look in one of the trace files but failed to get the news.
  Here is the example output from the trace file.
  
  /Cbsora1/ora10g/OraHome1/RDBMS/log/bdump/ucodb_ora_28171.TRC dump file
  Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production 64-bit
  With partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
  ORACLE_HOME = / cbsora1/ora10g/OraHome1
  Name of the system: HP - UX
  Name of the node: bcobdb01
  Press release: B.11.11
  Version: U
  Machine: 9000/800
  Instance name: UCODB
  Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
  Oracle process number: 0
  The Unix process PID: 28171, image: oracle@bcobdb01
  
  File "/ dev/async" absent: errno = 2
  /Cbsora1/ora10g/OraHome1/RDBMS/log/bdump/ucodb_ora_28171.TRC dump file
  Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production 64-bit
  With partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
  ORACLE_HOME = / cbsora1/ora10g/OraHome1
  Name of the system: HP - UX
  Name of the node: bcobdb01
  Press release: B.11.11
  Version: U
  Machine: 9000/800
  Instance name: UCODB
  Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
  Oracle process number: 0
  The Unix process PID: 28171, image: oracle@bcobdb01
  
  File "/ dev/async" absent: errno = 2
  /Cbsora1/ora10g/OraHome1/RDBMS/log/bdump/ucodb_ora_28171.TRC dump file
  Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production 64-bit
  With partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
  ORACLE_HOME = / cbsora1/ora10g/OraHome1
  Name of the system: HP - UX
  Name of the node: bcobdb01
  Press release: B.11.11
  Version: U
  Machine: 9000/800
  Instance name: UCODB
  Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
  Oracle process number: 0
  The Unix process PID: 28171, image: oracle@bcobdb01
  
  
  Thanks in advance,
  Samapriya

  This is a known problem with 10.2.x.x on HP - UX with a certain operating system configuration, you must define DISK_ASYNCH_IO on false and perhaps FILESYSTEMIO_OPTIONS voice against zero.

  Nicolas.

• Oracle XE, generating a huge amount of trace files

  Hi all
  
  one of our customer have oracle XE installed on windows, 32-bit and that XE is generating a lot of (in GB) trc file in BDUMP... These trace files varying from 200 M to 1 GB creating havoc on my drive that I'm out of my drive...
  
  I checked the sql_trace is set to false, no code in our application is running sql_trace = true, so I get no idea about this unexpected behavior of oracle XE...
  
  What should be the steps to remove this error... any suggestions would be appreciated...
  
  Thanks and greetings
  VD

  Can you post the first 20 lines of any of these trace files?

  Would it be a queue of work process?

• Trace file has many references obj # but this oppose is nowhere in SQL statements

  Hi all

  Oracle 11.2.0.3 x 64 on x 64 Linux.

  No CARS.
  

  I have a trace file (captured with lie = true, wait = true) where inside, I have a large number of obj # references for the object that is not in the above trace file nowhere.

  Example of part of the trace file:
  

  ...
  

  PARSING IN CURSOR #22 len = dep 52 = uid 0 = 46 oct = cover 3 = 46 tim = hv 43179827168145 = ad 1014772292 = "c00000023baba230" sqlid = "amqq2ncy7sck4."

  Select TNC in PF_TRX where (CTN =: b0 and ROWNUM = 1)

  END OF STMT

  ANALYSIS #22:c = 0, e = 17, p = 0, cr = 0, cu = 0, set = 0, r = 0, dep = 0, og = 1, plh is 2442708035, tim = 43179827168144

  LINKS FOR #22:

  Link #0

  oacdty = 01 mxl = 32 (25) = 00 mxlc bad = 00 = 00 = 00 pre scl

  oacflg = 00 fl2 = 1000000 frm = 01 csi = 32 off siz = 32 = 0

  kxsbbbfp = 9fffffffbf5faba0 = 32 avl bln = 10 flg = 05

  value = "0606015172".

  EXEC #22:c = 0, e = 94, p = 0, cr = 0, cu = 0, set = 0, r = 0, dep = 0, og = 1, plh is 2442708035, tim = 43179827168314

  WAITING #22: nam ='SQL * Net message to client' ela = 1 driver id = 1413697536 #bytes = 1 p3 = 0 obj #= 775422 = 44216143020385 tim

  FETCH #22:c = 0, e = 13, p = 0, cr = 2, cu = 0, set = 0, r = 1, dep = 0, og = 1, plh is 2442708035, tim = 43179827168378

  "STAT id #22 = 1 cnt = 1 pid = 0 obj = 0 op = pos = 1' STOPKEY COUNTY (cr = 2 pr = 0 pw = time 0 = 0 US)"

  STAT #22 = 2 cnt = 1 pid = 1 pos = 1 obj id = 8236 op ='INDEX RANGE SCAN PF_TRX_1IX (cr = 2 pr = 0 pw = time 0 = 0 US cost = 1 size = 11 card = 1)'

  WAITING #22: nam ='SQL * Net client message' ela = 135 driver id = 1413697536 #bytes = 1 p3 = 0 obj #= 775422 tim = 44216143020630

  ...
  

  obj #= 775422 is an index into a schema user wealth of paintings, consideration of related things.

  But the picture, who own index which is never mentioned in the trace file all (DDL, DML, or Select statement).

  TKPROF does not display as well without the presence of this table.
  

  How to interpret these topics, as registrations in the event of mine is the biggest event of waiting.

  THX,

  Damir
  

  «SQL * Net message to client "is in fact a wait on the BONE (layers TCPIP).»  Oracle is not clear when the package reaches the customer, he knows only that she has presented the package to the TCPIP services provided by the operating system on the database server.

  Hemant K Collette

• The Oracle trace: number of physical reads of the signifier of disk buffer

  Hi all

  
  Since yesterday, I was under the impression that, in a trace file Oracle, the "number of physical buffer of disk reads" should be reflected in the wait events section.

  Yesterday we add this trace file (Oracle 11 g 2):

  call the query of disc elapsed to cpu count current lines

  ------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------

  Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0

  Run 1 0.04 0.02 0 87 0 0

  Get 9 1.96 7.81 65957 174756 0 873

  ------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------

  total 11 2.01 7.84 65957 174843 0 873

  Elapsed time are waiting on the following events:

  Event waited on times max wait for the Total WHEREAS

  ----------------------------------------   Waited  ----------  ------------

  SQL * Net message to client 9 0.00 0.00

  reliable message 1 0.00 0.00

  ENQ: KO - checkpoint fast object 1 0.00 0.00

  direct path read 5074 0.05 5,88

  SQL * Net more data to the customer 5 0.00 0.00

  SQL * Net client message 9 0.01 0.00

  ********************************************************************************

  We can see that the 65957 physical disk reads resulted only 5074 direct path read. Normally, the number of physical reads from disk is more directly reflected in the wait events section.

  Is this normal? Why is that? Maybe because these discs are on a San have a cache?

  Best regards.

  Carl

  direct path read is an operation of e/s diluvium, is not just to read 1 block

• Trying to manage the background trace files

  With all the parameters of track known to zero, there are daily newspapers of processes that have no discernible purpose.  I'm looking for advice and solutions to reduce chatter.  I searched and have not yet found a source to explain why we need them.

  Since RDBMS 11 g, you can set the parameters of adrci SHORTP_POLICY and LONGP_POLICY.

  For example:

  [oracle@xxxxxxx ~] $ adrci

  ADRCI: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production on Mon Feb 4 11:15:54 2013

  Copyright (c) 1982, 2011, Oracle and/or its affiliates.  All rights reserved.

  Basis of the ADR = ' / u01/app/oracle '.
  adrci > show houses
  Houses of ADR:
  diag/rdbms/xxx/xxx
  diag/tnslsnr/xxxxxx/listener
  adrci > put House diag/rdbms/xxx/xxx
  adrci > set (SHORTP_POLICY = 240) # 240 hours: 10 days
  adrci > set (LONGP_POLICY = 240)
  adrci > put House diag/tnslsnr/xxx/listener
  adrci > set (SHORTP_POLICY = 240)
  adrci > set (LONGP_POLICY = 240)

  You can manually delete the trace files:

  adrci > put House diag/tnslsnr/xxx/listener

  adrci > purge - age 1440 - type track

  I hope this helps

  Borys

• I got a path wrong trace file

  Hello

  In the initPostgreSQL.ora file, I put ODBCINI=/etc/odbc.ini.

  In the odbc.ini file, I put the path of the trace on/tmp/odbc.log file.

  When I had a mistake in sqlplus, I will got some newspaper in the trace file.

  but he has always written log on/tmp/sql.log.

  I have not set on/tmp/sql.log path.

  I don' t know why he wrote the wrong file?

  -initPostgreSQL.ora-

  HS_FDS_CONNECT_INFO = PostgreSQL

  HS_FDS_TRACE_LEVEL = 255

  HS_FDS_SHAREABLE_NAME = /usr/local/unixodbc/lib/libodbc.so

  HS_LANGUAGE = AMERICAN_AMERICA. WE8ISO8859P1

  HS_NLS_NCHAR = UCS2

  Set ODBCINI=/etc/odbc.ini

  set LD_LIBRARY_PATH = / usr/local/93AS/lib

  odbc.ini-

  [PostgreSQL]

  Driver = /usr/local/93AS/connectors/odbc/lib/edb-odbc.so

  Description = Test2PG

  ServerName = 10.2.22.86

  PORT = 5444

  UserName = enterprisedb

  Password = oracle

  Database = testdb

  TRACE = Yes

  TaceFile = /tmp/odbc.log

  As far as I know when you want to have a trace file name dedicated using the ODBC driver manager unixODBC to put tracing settings in the [ODBC] section.

  Could you please check with a file odbcinst.ini looking like this:

  [pg]

  Driver=/usr/local/93AS/connectors/ODBC/lib/edb-ODBC.so

  [ODBC]

  TraceFile=/tmp/odbc.log

  Trace = 1

• Cannot generate the SQL * Net trace file on Linux

  Oracle 11 g 1 material

  RHEL 6.3

  --------------------

  SQLNET.ora file:

  SQLNET. AUTHENTICATION_SERVICES = (DOB, TCPS, NTS)

  SSL_VERSION = 0

  SSL_CLIENT_AUTHENTICATION = TRUE

  SSL_CIPHER_SUITES = (SSL_RSA_EXPORT_WITH_RC4_40_MD5)

  LOG_DIRECTORY_CLIENT = / home/oracle

  LOG_FILE_CLIENT = SQLNET.log

  TRACE_DIRECTORY_CLIENT = / home/oracle

  TRACE_FILE_CLIENT = SQLNET.trc

  DIAG_ADR_ENABLED = OFF

  TRACE_UNIQUE_CLIENT = WE

  The sqlnet.ora file above does not create a trace file when you try to use SQL * more to connect to the remote database.

  What could be the problem?  (The user has write access to the directory where the log file and the Commission of truth and reconciliation must be created)

  Answered my own question.  It was that o/s was THAT RHEL 5.3 and that caused some compatibility problems.  Updated to 6.5 and all is fine.

• Address of the instantiation of the cursor in the SQL trace files &gt; = 11.2.0.2

  Oracle Doc ID 11677061.8 mentions in 11.2.0.2 10046 trace / SQL_TRACE displays the address of the instantiation after the # rather than the number of cursor.

  Can someone explain what a "address instantiation" is and how to use it to identify the sliders in the trace of the files in an improvement on number of cursor.

  I have a theory that it may be useful when dealing with accumulated from several trace files using trcsess trace data.

  For the most part, I'm just curious to see if I can improve my performance skills by exploiting this change.  I can't find a single reference in the article or the blog describing the change.

  An example of the largest number of cursor that I see these days.

  PARSING IN CURSOR #48003855878616 len=65 dep=0 uid=370 oct=6 lid=370 tim=1366907498174148 hv=1477430740 ad='209f99a028' sqlid='40hwrntc0zmfn'

  ANALYSIS #48003855878616:c = 0, e = 4842, p = 0, cr = 0, cu = 0, set = 0, r = 0, dep = 0, og = 1, plh = 0, tim = 1366907498174146

  
  

  Pre 11.2.0.2 what it would look like
  

  
  

  PARSING IN CURSOR #3 len=65 dep=0 uid=370 oct=6 lid=370 tim=1366907498174148 hv=1477430740 ad='209f99a028' sqlid='40hwrntc0zmfn'

  ANALYSIS # 3: c = 0, e = 4842, p = 0, cr = 0, cu = 0, = 0, r = 0, dep = 0, og = 1, plh = 0, tim = 1366907498174146

  
  

  
  

  Here's what I read on the subject in 2010:

  The problem is that with the restructured cursor caching in 11g a statement executed again would come by number of different cursor for each run. As the number of cursor and the sqltext did not since the last use of the slider, the sqltext was printed for each execution of a cursor. It's a significant problem for applications like Oracle E-Business, where is typical SQL statement it is many thousands of characters. In some cases, this has increased the size of the file trace of an order of magnitude, and I'm sure it could be even worse.

  The solution was to pass the handle of the cached cursor (which is probably the address) and display instead of the cursor number. This should mean that the text is printed only on the first analysis of the SQL statement and the size of the trace file goes back to something reasonable.

  I believe you can "join" these new id values cursor from a trace file in a column of address in v$ sql, but I have not checked myself.

  I do not think that the change was intended to give the advantage of trcsess you are suspect, but it could turn out to be useful for this.

• Can not find the trace file after "alter database backup controlfile to trace;" on the RDBMS 11.2.0.3

  Hello

  I use a database on RDBMS 11.2.0.3. Connected as sys and run

  SQL > alter database backup controlfile to trace;

  Database altered.

  view the USER_DUMP_DEST parameter.

  VALUE OF TYPE NAME

  ------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------

  user_dump_dest string D:\app\oracle\diag\rdbms\pears

  dev\pearsdev\trace

  Looking at the track record, there is no trace file? What am I missing?

  Thank you

  Mathias

  Confirm with:

  SQL > dir D:\APP\ORACLE\CONTROLFILE the host. TXT