Generation of Oracle Trace files for a session

Hello

I use oracle 10g (10.2.0.5) in RHEL5 server. I used the instruction exec dbms_system.set_sql_trace_in_session (147,3,TRUE); to draw a particular session. I am able to track successfully, but I created a new table in this session where I'm not able to find any statement of create table in the trace file generated, but I can find the insert statements that I made on the table newly created in the trace file.

Is not recorded in the events of path of the DDL statements?

Kind regards

007

Salvation;

Please find below the doc who can help you

DBMS_SYSTEM. SET_SQL_TRACE_IN_SESSION GENERATES NO TRACE FOR THE SESSION ACTIVE [ID 236178.1]
How to enable the SQL Trace for all new Sessions [ID 178923.1]

Follow-up to the Sessions to Oracle using the package DBMS_SUPPORT [ID 62160.1]

Respect of
HELIOS

Tags: Database

Similar Questions

  • Oracle trace files

    Salvation Group

    My file system becomes full with Oracle trace files where the binary files are installed, they are not the kind of trace generated when a request for a trace session, they contain information that I am not able to read that they are updated daily.

    The path where these files are: /oracle/product/9.2.0/rdbms/log/instancename_ora_8103.trc


    That contain these files?
    I can remove them to save space?
    I can't stop their generation?

    SO: HP - UX 11.23
    Oracle: 9.2.0.8.0
    ------------------------------------------


    I copy some lines in the file:

    opidrv () + 1008 call 9fffffffffffbea0 9FFFFFFFFFFFDEA0?
    000000000? 000000000?
    C000000000000B9B?
    sou2o () + 48 9fffffffffffbea0 9FFFFFFFFFFFED00 call?
    000000000? 000000000?
    main() + 576 call 9fffffffffffbea0 9FFFFFFFFFFFF280?
    000000032? 000000000?
    000000000?
    main_opd_entry () + 80 call 9fffffffffffbea0 000000001?
    9FFFFFFFFFFFF748?
    C000000000000004?
    C00000000002BE30?

    -Binary stack dump-

    = FRAME [1] (ksedmp () + 528-> 9ffffffffffd8ca0) =.
    BSP 9FFFFFFFBF806A30 sp 9FFFFFFFFFFD4280
    0x9FFFFFFFFFFD4958 to 0x9FFFFFFFFFFD49B0 memory dump
    9FFFFFFFFFFD4950 9FFFFFFF FFFFDEA0 [...]
    9FFFFFFFFFFD4960 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [...]
    C0000000 00000B9B 01435F60 40000000 9FFFFFFFFFFD4970 [... @...] [C_']
    9FFFFFFFFFFD4980 0000EAAB 00000000 9FFFFFFF FFFFDE70 [.. p]
    60000000 00531478 9FFFFFFF BF7FF390 9FFFFFFFFFFD4990 ['...] S.x........]
    9FFFFFFFFFFD49A0 9FFFFFFF 00000000 00000000 FFFFDE60 [...'...]

    Thank you

    You can't stop their generation, or no sane person would want. If something goes wrong and you don't have them, you may be roasted.

    What you can do is delete them when they are no longer needed for the purpose of management.

  • GENERATION OF THE LDT FILE FOR SPECIFIC SUBMENU OF THE MENU

    Hello

    I am creating a menu using the script below in the TDL file.

    $FND_TOP/bin/FNDLOAD apps / $CLIENT_APPS_PWD O Y DOWNLOAD $FND_TOP/patch/115/import/afsload.lct ICX_POR_SSP_HOME.ldt MENU menu_name = "ICX_POR_SSP_HOME."

    It works very well. If 10 submenus are attached to the menu, it generates all the submenus using script above in the TDL file.

    My requirement is, I want to generate LDT only for some specific subemenus for this menu.

    Is there any script or any other alternative to it.

    It is very urgent, please help me as soon as possible.

    Thanks in advance.

    Hello

    You can use the PARENT_MENU_NAME and SUB_MENU_NAME parameters to try to only get submenus you need. This works if you only need a submenu, or submenus are appointed in the same way. You could also manually delete submenus you don't need the ldt generated.

    It will be useful.

  • not generating the trace for rdf report by oracle apps file

    Hi all


    in fact, we aim to generate trace file for reports and a convert to text file using tkprof by simultaneous program unix shell script submit using fnd_request.submit_request in another program of concurrent proceedings. but all the reports that are created by using pl/sql generates the trace file, but rdf report does not trace file.

    Report generator Oracle 6i is used

    Oracle application is 11i

    List of measures are being taken to get the trace file are
    1.SRW. USER_EXIT (' FND SRWINIT' "); before the release of report
    2SRW. USER_EXIT ("FND SRWEXIT'"); in after the report

    another of the measures which are followed
    SRW.do_sql ("alter session set SQL_TRACE = TRUE'"); before release of the report
    SRW.do_sql ("alter session set SQL_TRACE = FALSE'"); in after the report

    above, said steps are done, but still it does not arouse any trace file

    same oracle_process is null

    Select oracle_process_id from the fnd_concurrent_requests where request_id

    ID processOracle for this report oracle rdf file is not generated.


    Please help me in this issue

    Thank you

    Published by: 797525 on October 12, 2012 12:43 AM

    Add the following line before the outbreak of report
    SRW. DO_SQL ("alter session set events = tracefile_identifier" trace 10046 name context forever, level 4 "=" REPORT ' ")

    Trace stops automatically when the report closes.

    In addition, what program submits the script fnd_request.submit_request... shell / pl/sql procedure?

    you initialize apps FND_GLOBAL. APPS_INITIALIZE before submit_request of shooting?

    Make a DNF: active Log Debug = Yes and check the table of fnd_log_messages

    See the following MOS docs:
    Oracle 6i [ID 111311.1] follow-up reports
    See you soon,.
    ND
    Use the buttons "useful" or "correct" to award points to the answers.

  • Directory for the trace file permissions

    Oracle11gR2 64-bit rhel5

    Hi all

    I was wondering if there is a way to set the permissions on the directories of oracle trace files permanently? All groups and users have been implemented correctly and some users received 777 on some directories, but they always can access new trace files generated. It seems that when oracle generates new trace files, it replaces the permissions set on the directory.

    For example, if I put the directory "trace" to 777 all files will be reading/writing/execution. However new files/directories created will be 755 and now are not accessible for some users. It seems that Oracle is something internally or back to the method by default as it set up with. How can I change this behavior?

    Thank you.

    Dear JrOraDBA,

    There is a setting in * nix called UMASK. If you export the value of this setting to 777, I guess that the problem will be solved.

    777 means;

    First 7 for the current user
    Second 7 for current user's group
    Third 7 for the other users.
    

    It will be useful,

    Ogan

  • Phase of extraction in a trace file

    Oracle version: 11.2.0.3.0 Enterprise Edition
    Operating system - IBM/AIX RISC System/6000

    I'm trying to generate a trace file from a piece of code executed by the java server. What I asked the java developer to do is to place this block immediately after a connection is established:
    BEGIN
      EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'ALTER SESSION SET TRACEFILE_IDENTIFIER = ''M1''';
      dbms_monitor.session_trace_enable(waits => FALSE, binds => TRUE);
    END;
    And at the end of the block of logic java code:
    BEGIN
      dbms_monitor.session_trace_disable;
    END;
    I want to know is how many lines the java Server recovers after executing a particular select statement, because they complain about getting less account lines select statement waits.
    For example, if I run the same query sql in the sqlplus session, then we'll, I extract say 1000 rows.
    When the same query is executed on the side of java, the lines of recoveries are less in number, let's say 500.
    And because I doubt it, I wanted to trace to see what is actually executed and how.
    The extract of the trace file I see exactly the same query that I myself run in a sqplus session.
    There is no precise control over the udnerlying tables in the query.

    And my question is, how to interpret the phase EXTRACTION of the slider (for the select statement)?
    For example, if I see a FETCH for this cursor, this means that the java server retrieves a single row?
    If I see 100 extractions, this means that they recovered 100 lines of the cursor?

    Here's a short excerpt from the trace file (please don't crucify me for obvious denormalized tables design, and the request it is not invented by me):
    PARSING IN CURSOR #4573587152 len=667 dep=0 uid=737 oct=3 lid=737 tim=17685516462413 hv=954980718 ad='70000006d3e4940' sqlid='69pm96nwfrqbf'
    select /* ordered */ o.id, nvl(o.par_id, -1) as par_id, o.NAME_GER, o.NAME_ENG, o.NAME_ESP, o.NAME_ITL,o.NAME_FRA, decode(lo.lflag, 'Y', 'L', 'N') as leaf_or_node, lo.distance + 1 as "LEVEL",  to_char(o.beg_date, 'DD.MM.YYYY HH24:MI:SS'),  o.mais_id, l.path, nvl(o.non_selectable, 'N')  from   st_prod o, lprod_new l, lprod lo where  o.end_date = to_date('31.12.3999', 'DD.MM.YYYY') and   (lo.id, lo.beg_date) in (select id, beg_date from st_prod where par_id is null and end_date = to_date('31.12.3999', 'DD.MM.YYYY')) and   lo.lid = o.id and lo.lid_beg_date = o.beg_date and   l.st_prod_id = o.id and l.st_prod_beg_date = o.beg_date order by lo.distance, o.name_ger
    END OF STMT
    PARSE #4573587152:c=31,e=152,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=1,plh=2027551050,tim=17685516462412
    EXEC #4573587152:c=80,e=375,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=1,plh=2027551050,tim=17685516462936
    
    *** 2013-03-11 11:28:09.122
    FETCH #4573587152:c=519446,e=892645,p=0,cr=113446,cu=0,mis=0,r=10,dep=0,og=1,plh=2027551050,tim=17685517355715
    FETCH #4573587152:c=37,e=59,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=10,dep=0,og=1,plh=2027551050,tim=17685517359109
    FETCH #4573587152:c=39,e=63,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=10,dep=0,og=1,plh=2027551050,tim=17685517361128
    FETCH #4573587152:c=29,e=46,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=10,dep=0,og=1,plh=2027551050,tim=17685517362849
    FETCH #4573587152:c=31,e=48,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=10,dep=0,og=1,plh=2027551050,tim=17685517364621
    <162 more FETCH-es here>
    <STAT phase>
    CLOSE #4573587152:c=533,e=849,dep=0,type=1,tim=17685517671878
    It is possible based on the trace file (if I have to change something in the way of tracing) to determine the number of rows retrieved?
    FETCH #4573587152:c=519446,e=892645,p=0,cr=113446,cu=0,mis=0,r=10,dep=0,og=1,plh=2027551050,tim=17685517355715
    FETCH #4573587152:c=37,e=59,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=10,dep=0,og=1,plh=2027551050,tim=17685517359109
    FETCH #4573587152:c=39,e=63,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=10,dep=0,og=1,plh=2027551050,tim=17685517361128
    FETCH #4573587152:c=29,e=46,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=10,dep=0,og=1,plh=2027551050,tim=17685517362849
    FETCH #4573587152:c=31,e=48,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=10,dep=0,og=1,plh=2027551050,tim=17685517364621
    

    Each FETCH call returns r = number of lines.

    Run TKPROF trace file for a readable activity summary.

    How to interpret the phase EXTRACTION of the slider (for the select statement)?

    The java code uses a default fetchsize to 10 (lines per extraction).

  • Trace file is not generated

    Hello

    I use Oracle 10 g Rel2.

    I'm trying to generate the trace for a session using DBMS_SYSTEM file.

    First of all, I used DBMS_SYSTEM. Procedure SET_SQL_TRACE_IN_SESSION to generate the trace for a session, but that file was generating trace udump directory files. Then I checked on the net and found that we cannot generate the trace file in this way for active sessions.

    Then I tried to use DBMS_SYSTEM. Procedure SET_ENV, same results. It also generates trace files?

    No idea why this is happening? In addition to around how long should I activate trace?




    Thanks in advance.

    It does not generate all trace file unless drawn session perform some activity.

    Lukasz

  • How to find trace files

    Hello...

    How can I get associated with a particular event trace files...

    I know the location of the trace files (< ORACLE_BASE > \diag\rdbms\orcl\orcl\trace) and also I can put name suffix of the trace files...

    I want to know... How to identify them it IE problems, so how can I get the trace file for this error...

    Please suggest... Thanks in advance...

    You can use the views of GDR

    http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/B28359_01/server.111/b28310/diag006.htm#CHDIHIBA

    http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/B28359_01/server.111/b28310/diag001.htm#CHDIABAA

  • Question about errors stored in our trace files

    DB version: 12.1.0.2.5 Linux

    I'm looking for trace files for one of our production database and I see entries that are similar to the following:

    kjgcr_StatCheckLCP: getweinfo returned error, kjzsret = 0 x 0

    I Googled, searched this forum and the research in the MOD and I can't find what it means.

    Does anyone have an idea of what they show?

    Thank you

    Thomas

    Thomas Morgan wrote:

    DB version: 12.1.0.2.5 Linux

    I'm looking for trace files for one of our production database and I see entries that are similar to the following:

    kjgcr_StatCheckLCP: getweinfo returned error, kjzsret = 0 x 0

    I Googled, searched this forum and the research in the MOD and I can't find what it means.

    Does anyone have an idea of what they show?

    Thank you

    Thomas

    submit the Service request to MOS

  • TKProf: 0 user SQL statement trace file

    Hello!

    Please explain, what is the difference of conversion of trace file of user session and a process internal/bottom of tkprof?
    I get message 'SQL statement of 0 user in the trace file' cause this difference?
    In my target sitting, I published:
    start
    sys.dbms_system.set_ev (...,..., 10046, 12, ");
    end;
    /
    Start
    sys.dbms_system.set_ev (...,..., 10053, 1, ");
    end;
    /
    Thanks and regards,.
    Pavel

    Have you tried a 10053 trace of tkprof?

    This only goes to show anything. 10053 tracks are supposed to be read as they are. TKProf is here to treat the 10046 trace.

  • Cannot write trace files destined for the bottom dump in oracle 10 g

    Hi all

    Version of the OS: RHEL 5.7
    DB version: 10.2.0.4
    cluster: database node 2 RAC

    Today I faced a strange behavior for one of our production database. Its a database of 2 rac nodes. There is no automatic generation of trace files in the destination of bottom dump on the first node. I am able to see the second trace files in its context dump dest. But the strange behavior occurs on the first node. I see that alert logfile in the bottom dump dest. Despite an error that displays the generated trace file but no file is located in the bdump. Here is the error, but physically he no trace file is generated:
    Errors in file/oracle/db/admin / < sid > /bdump/ < sid >j0011558.trc:
    ORA-12012: error on auto run 94377 work
    ORA-12008: error path refresh materialized view
    can someone have any idea for this strange behavior. There is no script maintenance for the removal of trace files.

    Kind regards
    Imran Khan

    its his work after you re-create your synonym then Yes you should not recreate MV again.

  • Trace file created for the wrong session

    DB version: 10.2.0.3.0
    Version of the operating system: Solaris 5.10
    2 node RAC

    With the help of DBMS_MONITOR. SESSION_TRACE_ENABLE, I tried to draw an oracle session led by a C++ application.

    So, I determined which instance this session is connected by querying the gv$ session. I logged, SYS in this instance of node and then issued
    execute dbms_monitor.session_trace_enable(4371,98124, true, false);
    After activating, I saw new a trace file that is generated. But this track is actually some tracking SYS session that executed dbms_monitor.session_trace_enable and not the session (4371,98124). I tested a few session of SYS as basic queries
    select sysdate from dual
    And I see all these complaints contained in the trace file. What could be the cause of this problem?

    I noticed that
    SHARED_SERVERS = 1
    on both nodes. Is the origin of this strange problem? For the follow-up, if I disable using SHARED_SERVERS
    alter system set SHARED_SERVERS = 0
    It can cause connection problems for client applications because of their setting of the tnsnames.ora file?

    Hi, you can also try this one in conjunction with the dbms_monitor.

    DBMS_SYSTEM. SET_SQL_TRACE_IN_SESSION

    concerning

  • trace generation for a session

    Hi all

    I have a problem with enabling sql trace for a particular sql code that gives performance problems

    IAM using oracle 9.2.0.6 with EBS 11.5.10 and OS is HP-UX 11.11

    I've identified on BONES of top command

    so I ran the following query to obtain the sid and serial No.

    Select spid, s.sid, p.serial #, s.terminal, pid, machine, s.program, osuser,.
    p.Program, w.event from v$ session s, v$ process p,.
    v$ session_wait w where addr = paddr and (spid like ' % & & % DISO ' or)
    process as ' % & & % DISO ')
    and w.sid (+) = s.sid;


    as I do not know which user executed this code


    now, I tried to start tracing for this session

    EXECUTE dbms_system.set_sql_trace_in_session ('59 ',' 9', TRUE);

    but I cud not see any trace file generated in user_dump_destination

    How can I generate the trace for this particular session?

    If a SQL statement began performing at 10:01 and you enable followed by the session at 10:02:05 and the SQL triggers No. LOOKS because it runs all with logical bed, CPU, without increasing the physical read waits ("db-reading scattered files" or "db file sequential read") and don't experience lock causint claim to wait on the latches etc... then it do not write in the trace file.
    Only the following SQL statement OR the appearance of a wait will cause an entry in the trace file.

    (Of course, the other possibility is that you have enabled tracing on the incorrect Session SID. Applications Oracle EBS notoriously used two or more database sessions as well.
    There are a large number of Metalink Note on EBS track sessions.
    Start with Notes 171647.1 and then read Thraliana mentioned therein).

  • Generate the trace for another session file and change the path

    Hello

    Please let me know how to configure tracing for another session and it is also possible that the trace file can be re-directed to another path than the default path user_dump_dest?

    Kind regards

    VN

    Use DBMS_MONITOR. SESSION_TRACE_ENABLE (and SESSION_TRACE_DISABLE).

    as far as I know, you cannot change the default location of the trace file.

    In a session, you can change its path filename with ALTER SESSION SET TRACEFILE_IDENTIFIER = "";

    Hemant K Collette

  • How to stop the generation of the trace of the files concern the particular user

    Dear all,

    Please advice:

    Is it possible to stop the trace file that is created by a user for a particular job (sql/exp)

    For example:
    Create trace files whenever the user has run the sql/exp command from the application server.
    Which created a large files and caused the file system is full (not in bdump but it's generation in the home directory of the user application).
    Is there a method to stop the generation of trace records relate to the particular user base on this job.

    Thank you
    Nathalie

    Dear GEORGE

    This trigger will be created for that specific user by dba or anyone with sysdba privileges. It will be triggered at the time of login of this user and edit the sqltrace.

    for example, we write a trigger in our database for each ddl operation in the database.

    CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER "SYS." "' SYS$ DDLTRIG" after the DDL on the database
    declare
    v_machinename VARCHAR2 (100);
    v_osuser VARCHAR2 (100);
    v_dbuser VARCHAR2 (100);
    v_host VARCHAR2 (100);
    v_program VARCHAR2 (100);
    v_instance VARCHAR2 (100);
    T_DATE VARCHAR2 (100);
    Start
    Select to_char (sysdate, ' dd-mm-yyyy HH24:MI:SS), user, sys_context (' userenv ',' OS_ ")
    USER'), sys_context ('userenv', 'HOST'), (select instance_name of v$ instance), (se
    You can select program session $ v where sid = (select distinct sid from v$ mystat)), (se
    machine READING of session $ v where sid = (select distinct sid from v$ mystat)) int
    o T_DATE, v_dbuser, v_osuser, v_host, v_instance, v_program, v_machinename of double;
    IF ora_sysevent = 'DROP' or ora_sysevent = 'CANCEL' or ora_sysevent = 'GRANT' or
    ora_sysevent = 'CREATE' or ora_sysevent = 'TRUNCATE' or ora_sysevent = 'CHANGE '.
    Then
    insert into ddl_log_new (T_DATE, v_dbuser, v_osuser, v_host, v_instance, v_program, v_m
    achinename, V_EVENT, V_OBJECT_NAME, V_OBJECT_TYPE, V_OBJECT_OWNER) values (T_DATE, v_
    dbuser, v_osuser, v_host, v_instance, v_program, v_machinename, ora_sysevent, ora_dict_
    obj_name, ora_dict_obj_type, ora_dict_obj_owner);
    END IF;
    END;

    I hope that above example will be useful to you,

    Concerning
    Evelyne

    Published by: ambrishr24 on 5 December 2012 17:02

    Published by: ambrishr24 on 5 December 2012 17:05

    Published by: ambrishr24 on 5 December 2012 17:20

Maybe you are looking for