ORDER BY clause with an expression

Similar Questions

• ORDER BY clause or HAVING clause... ERROR

  Hi, I request what error throws please find the solution for the application to go without danger...
  
  
  Select C.src_cd,
  D.src_nm,
  Count (*) supp_clm_count,
  (CASE WHEN A.clm_ttladjamt > 0 then A.clm_ttladjamt to another A.clm_ttlreqamt END) as the amount
  Of IWOWNER. WC_clm, a.
  IWOWNER. WC_clm_srvc B,.
  LOVELY. WC_SRC C.
  LOVELY. WC_SRC_lang D
  where A.clm_id = B.clm_id
  and A.rcv_loc_id = C.src_id
  and C.src_id = D.src_id
  and TRANSLATE (A.clm_rqst_type_cd) = "SUPPLIERCLAIM".
  and TRANSLATE (A.clm_typ_cd) in ('GUARANTEE', 'PRE-DELIVERY')
  and DATE (A.clm_create_dt) between January 1, 2000 "and on January 1, 2010"
  C.src_cd group, D.src_nm
  
  
  
  ERROR:
  -------
  
  SQLSTATE: 42803, SQLERRMC: CLM_TTLADJAMT
  Message: An expression starting with "CLM_TTLADJAMT" specified in a SELECT clause, HAVING clause, or ORDER BY clause is not specified in the GROUP BY clause or a SELECT clause, a HAVING clause ORDER BY clause with a column function and no GROUP BY clause is specified

  Hello

  With oracle, you can try this query.

  Salim cordially.

  /* Formatted on 2009/07/22 10:10 (Formatter Plus v4.8.8) */
  SELECT DISTINCT c.src_cd, d.src_nm,
                  COUNT (1) OVER (PARTITION BY c.src_cd, d.src_nm)
                                                                 supp_clm_count,
                  (CASE
                      WHEN a.clm_ttladjamt > 0
                         THEN a.clm_ttladjamt
                      ELSE a.clm_ttlreqamt
                   END
                  ) AS amount
             FROM iwowner.wc_clm a,
                  iwowner.wc_clm_srvc b,
                  showner.wc_src c,
                  showner.wc_src_lang d
            WHERE a.clm_id = b.clm_id
              AND a.rcv_loc_id = c.src_id
              AND c.src_id = d.src_id
              AND a.clm_rqst_type_cd = 'SUPPLIERCLAIM'
              AND a.clm_typ_cd IN ('WARRANTY', 'PRE-DELIVERY')
              AND a.clm_create_dt BETWEEN TO_DATE ('01/01/2000', 'dd/mm/yyyy')
                                      AND TO_DATE ('01/01/2010', 'dd/mm/yyyy')
  

• Order by clause

  Hello

  I want to know what it means when I use the "order by" clause with more than one column in both cases (sort order, it's the same, and when the sort order is different), for example

  What should happen when I do this

  1 Select * from table

  order by 1, 2; -both are a CSA

  2 - Select * from table

  order by 1 asc, desc 2;

  in both cases if it sorts the column with the first column without worrying, it is asc or desc, order another column order, because he should get

  related data in the first column, then another sort column does nothing?

  Am I wrong?

  Thank you

  SQL > select * from t by col1, col2 CSA CSA;

  COL1 COL2

  -------------------- --------------------

  1                    1

  1                    2

  1                    3

  2                    1

  2                    2

  SQL > select * from t by CSA col1, col2 desc;

  COL1 COL2

  -------------------- --------------------

  1                    3

  1                    2

  1                    1

  2                    2

  2                    1

• Problem with order by clause

  Hai all,
  
  I have problem with order by clause,
  
  My query is
  
  "Select number from table1 order number CSA.
  
  and the output as
  
  1
  10
  12
  13
  15
  17
  19
  2
  20
  21
  22
  .
  ........
  
  But if we give the order that it should display below the only good?
  
  1
  2
  10
  12
  13
  15
  17
  19
  20
  21
  22 ........
  
  Help me please why it is not displayed as she. and how to make the statement to display as in the second case. Thanks in advance.
  
  Kind regards
  Uraja

  In your table, the column is VARCHAR2 data type.

  It is a string, even if it is to store numeric values, it will get condemn as strings

  Try the below

  select your_column from table1 order by to_number(your_column) asc 
  

  Published by: JAC on November 19, 2012 16:35

• Need help with order by clause row_number() Fn

  with t as
  (
   select 123 id, 'brwr' lstatus from dual
   union all
   select 123 id, 'ca' lstatus from dual
   union all
   select 123 id, 'fac' lstatus from dual
   union all
   select 345 id, 'ca' lstatus from dual
   union all
   select 345 id, 'brwr' lstatus from dual
   union all
   select 567 id, 'brwr' lstatus from dual
   union all
   select 789 id, 'brwr' lstatus from dual
   union all
   select 1011 id, 'fac' lstatus from dual
  union all
   select 1011 id, 'xyz' lstatus from dual
  )select id,lstatus,row_number() over(partition by id order by lstatus)rw
   from t;

  Desired output
  

  id           lstatus       rn
  
  123         brwr         3
  123         ca          1
  123         fac         2
  345         ca          1
  345         brwr         2
  567         brwr         1
  789         brwr         1
  1011         fac        1
  1011  xyz         2

  That is, my first priority is to 'ca', then 'College '.
  
  I am aware that this can be done through the use of CASE within the order by clause
  but could not find the logic of the apt.
  
  Please help me.

  A solution just for data given to samples...

  with t as
  (
   select 123 id, 'brwr' lstatus from dual
   union all
   select 123 id, 'ca' lstatus from dual
   union all
   select 123 id, 'fac' lstatus from dual
   union all
   select 345 id, 'ca' lstatus from dual
   union all
   select 345 id, 'brwr' lstatus from dual
   union all
   select 567 id, 'brwr' lstatus from dual
   union all
   select 789 id, 'brwr' lstatus from dual
   union all
   select 1011 id, 'fac' lstatus from dual
  union all
   select 1011 id, 'xyz' lstatus from dual
  )select id,lstatus,row_number() over(partition by id order by (case  when lstatus <> 'brwr' THEN UPPER(lstatus) else lstatus end)) rw
   from t;
  

  Basically, it shows how to use the CASE statement. You can change based on your actual data.

  Concerning
  Arun

• Cannot wrap a select with order by clause in a file.

  TOGETHER SET TERMOUT OFF FEEDBACK OFF PAGESIZE 0 400 LINESIZE ECHO OFF OFF POSITION

  coil & 1;

  Select "EMPID, EMP_NAME, REGION, FROM, TO, MONTH, ACTIVITY_TYPE, PROJECT_PIN, MILESTONE_NAME, PRACTICE_ID, RESOURCE_CATEGORY, HOURS, COMMENT, percent ALLOCATION, INVOICE_TO, the STATE of the double"

  Union of all the

  select empid,resource_name,region,week_of,(week_of+7),core_month,bill_rate,project_name,project_type,milestone_name,practice_id,resource_category,total_hours_submitted,project_type,"%ALLOCATION",invoice_to,status from master_emp_allocation order by week_of;

  spool off;

  "exit";

  /

  the above block gives result below

  select empid,resource_name,region,week_of,(week_of+7),core_month,bill_rate,project_name,project_type,milestone_name,practice_id,resource_category,total_hours_submitted,project_type,"%ALLOCATION",invoice_to,status from master_emp_allocation order by week_of

  *

  ERROR at line 3:

  ORA-00904: "WEEK_OF": invalid identifier

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Without the order by clause it wraps the file passed as an argument.

  check

  Combining the UNION AGENDA and BY

  Columns in the ORDER BY list must be a subset of the columns in the selection list on the left side of the union.

  All the columns in the ORDER BY list should be sorted in ascending order, and they must be a prefix in the order of the columns in the target of the left side of the UNION list.

• Evaluate the Expression in the order by Clause

  Hello
  
  I'm struggling to run after JPQL.
  
  Select r.firstname, r.lastname, (e.distance/e.duration) from Runner r Inner Join r.event e Order BY (e.distance/e.duration) Desc;
  
  Error suggests that ' (' character is unacceptable in the Order By Clause.) Here is the error.
  
  javax.servlet.ServletException: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: an exception occurred while creating a query in EntityManager:
  Description of the exception: syntax error parsing the query [Select r.firstname, r.lastname, (e.distance/e.duration) of Runner r Inner Join r.event e Order BY Desc (e.distance/e.duration);], line 1, column 101: unexpected token [()].
  Inner exception: NoViableAltException (81! = [1328:1: orderByItem returns [object node]: (n = stateFieldPathExpression (a = ASC | DESC = d |) | I = IDENT (a CSA = | d = DESC |)) ;])])
  
  Can someone show me please how to fix it.
  
  Thank you
  Adam

  What version do you use? It should work in EclipseLink > 2.1.

  ---
  James: http://www.eclipselink.org

• sys_context and order by clause

  Hi all
  
  IM using Oracle 11 g R2.
  
  Is it somehow possible to use the context variable (to store the column name) in the ORDER BY clause? My ultimate goal is to build by Order at run time, without using the concatenation.
  
  for example, I created context as my_ctx for some pkg and its variable as v_ctx with a value defined as 'TABLE_NAME '.
  So it is possible to use it as
  
  Select * from all_tables
  sys_context order ('my_ctx', 'v_ctx');
  
  If not, does perform a work around?
  
  Thank you
  Vivek

  Hi, Vivek,

  Vivek says:
  Hi all

  IM using Oracle 11 g R2.

  Is it somehow possible to use the context variable (to store the column name) in the ORDER BY clause? My ultimate goal is to build by Order at run time, without using the concatenation.

  Of course, you can use SYS_CONTEXT in an ORDER BY clause, but it is unclear what you are trying to do, so I don't know if SYS_CONTEXT will help you.

  for example, I created context as my_ctx for some pkg and its variable as v_ctx with a value defined as 'TABLE_NAME '.
  So it is possible to use it as

  Select * from all_tables
  sys_context order ('my_ctx', 'v_ctx');

  If not, does perform a work around?

  Post a full test script Hat people can run to recreate the problem and test their ideas. Show the output you want from the parameters a data you give.

  Consider using a CASE expression in the ORDER BY clause. You can use SYS_CONTEXT in the expression BOX, if you wish.

• Purpose of the ORDER BY clause in the analytic function Min Max

  I was always using analytical functions like Min Max without ORDER BY clause. But today I used with the ORDER BY clause. The results are very different. I would like to know the purpose of the ORDER BY clause in Min, Max and analogues of analytical functions.

  user10566312 wrote:
  I was always using analytical functions like Min Max without ORDER BY clause. But today I used with the ORDER BY clause. The results are very different. I would like to know the purpose of the ORDER BY clause in Min, Max and analogues of analytical functions.

  It is a good point that many developers are not so aware. As far as I understand it the way it works.

  Some analytical functions do not need an order by or windowing clause (SUM, COUNT, MIN, etc.). If there is no specified window, then the full score is the window.
  As soon as you add a command also add you a windowing clause. This window has the default value of 'rank ofrows between unbounded preceding and current_row. So as soon as you add an order by clause, you get a sliding window.

  Documentation: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/functions001.htm

  windowing_clause
  ...
  You cannot specify this clause unless you specified the order_by_clause. Window limits defined by the clause RANGE you can not specify only a single expression to the > order_by_clause. Please refer to 'Restrictions on the ORDER BY Clause'.

  example of

  with testdata as (select 10 numval, level lv from dual connect by level < 10)
  select lv, numval, sum(numval) over () sum1, sum(numval) over (order by lv) sum2
  from testdata;
  
  LV NUMVAL SUM1 SUM2
  -- ------ ---- ----
   1     10   90   10
   2     10   90   20
   3     10   90   30
   4     10   90   40
   5     10   90   50
   6     10   90   60
   7     10   90   70
   8     10   90   80
   9     10   90   90 
  

  Published by: Sven w. on 25 Sep 2012 16:57 - default behavior has been corrected. Thanks to Chris

• Can I connect a link more MXI for PXI-1033 card in order to work with it

  Ladies and gentlemen,

  Tell me please that I can plug a card of MXI link more in the PXI-1033 chassis in order to work with it.

  In other words, I don't use the built-in controller for MXI and want to work with the NI PXI-8366 MXI-Express and PXI-1033.

  Thank you.

  The answer to your question is no. The question that must be taken into consideration is the type of housing, we have access to on the PXI-1033. To use a PXI MXI card for control purposes in a PXI system, we need to use the card in a slot of system controller (denoted by a triangle around the number of slots on the chassis). With the 1033 however, we have no access to slots control. Because of the connection of controller MXI incorporated, we only have access to a calendar/trigger and devices slots.

  Is there a particular reason you don't want to use on the 1033 MXI connection, or you just want to avoid having to change the connection to another computer?  Single MXI cards which would depend on the space available on the PXI-1033 would be something along the lines of the 8367 and 8367, who are used to the Garland of a separate chassis.

• Order By clause does not

  I have a very basic SQL statement that I am running on a simple table of three columns. I just want to choose two of the three columns basing selection on a column, then rank each other. I use version 9.2.0.1.0 and I tried to use sqlplus and toad 10.6 and the results are the same in both. My problem is that even if I use an Order By clause the results not be sorted. I have countless statements written and never had a problem with the Order By clause before. I'm puzzled.

  Executed SQL statement:

  Select COL3 From Table1 where COL2 = 1 Order By COL3;

  Result:

  DXXXXX
  NXXX Mxxx/Cxxxx CXXV
  Nzzzz Ezzzz
  Oxxxxxxxxxx Exxxx
  Rxxxxxxxxx Exxxx
  Sxxxxxxx Exxxx
  Sxxxxxx Hxxx
  gxxxxxxx

  You should know that I replaced everything except the first letter of each letters to alter woth Word. There's nothing remarkable about the table:

  Executed SQL statement:

  DESC Table1;

  Result:

  Table1 TABLE:
  Name                                      Null?    Type
  ----------------------------------------- -------- ----------------------------
  COL1                                                   NUMBER
  COL2                                                   NUMBER
  COL3 VARCHAR2 (255)

  Hello

  Use this...

  Select COL3 From Table1 where COL2 = 1 Order By LOWER (COL3);

  It should work once you order by the case-based.

  When you view, its up to you, if you want to use all the conversions of case or not

• How to order by working with rownum

  Oracle worm: 11g
  
  Hi all
  I have 2 cases here, with external control by one and another without external by command.
  I see no difference in the results for the moment.
  Case 1:

  /* Formatted on 4/30/2013 2:12:28 PM (QP5 v5.240.12305.39446) */
  SELECT *
    FROM (  SELECT ROWNUM rn, id
              FROM (SELECT 9 AS id FROM DUAL
                    UNION ALL
                    SELECT 1 FROM DUAL
                    UNION ALL
                    SELECT 14 FROM DUAL
                    UNION ALL
                    SELECT 7 FROM DUAL
                    UNION ALL
                    SELECT 5 FROM DUAL
                    UNION ALL
                    SELECT 6 FROM DUAL
                    UNION ALL
                    SELECT 13 FROM DUAL
                    UNION ALL
                    SELECT 8 FROM DUAL
                    UNION ALL
                    SELECT 2 FROM DUAL
                    UNION ALL
                    SELECT 4 FROM DUAL
                    UNION ALL
                    SELECT 19 FROM DUAL
                    UNION ALL
                    SELECT 3 FROM DUAL)
          ORDER BY id)
   WHERE rn BETWEEN 1 AND 6;
   

  Case 2:
  I added the command by external clause in this case
  But I want to make sure if I really need to have the order of outer query by here.

  /* Formatted on 4/30/2013 2:12:28 PM (QP5 v5.240.12305.39446) */
  SELECT *
    FROM (  SELECT ROWNUM rn, id
              FROM (SELECT 9 AS id FROM DUAL
                    UNION ALL
                    SELECT 1 FROM DUAL
                    UNION ALL
                    SELECT 14 FROM DUAL
                    UNION ALL
                    SELECT 7 FROM DUAL
                    UNION ALL
                    SELECT 5 FROM DUAL
                    UNION ALL
                    SELECT 6 FROM DUAL
                    UNION ALL
                    SELECT 13 FROM DUAL
                    UNION ALL
                    SELECT 8 FROM DUAL
                    UNION ALL
                    SELECT 2 FROM DUAL
                    UNION ALL
                    SELECT 4 FROM DUAL
                    UNION ALL
                    SELECT 19 FROM DUAL
                    UNION ALL
                    SELECT 3 FROM DUAL)
          ORDER BY id)
   WHERE rn BETWEEN 1 AND 6;
   ORDER BY id;

  Thank you
  Rod.

  Hey, Rod,

  SamFisher wrote:
  ... I see no difference in the results for the moment.

  You can not, but you are not sure that you will never see a difference. There may be a difference if you change versions, or if you add more data, or for no apparent reason.

  If there is an ORDER BY clause in the main query (as in query 2) then the output is guaranteed to be in that order.
  Is there no ORDER BY clause in the main query (as in the query 1), then there is no guarantee that the lines will be in a particular order. If Oracle finds it convenient to display rows in order by one of the columns (for example, rn) then she will do. You can't count on it always does the same thing, unless there is an ORDER BY clause.

  You should check the ROW_NUMBER analytic function. It is much more useful and easier to understand, as ROWNUM. (In this example, it maybe not simple, however.)

• order by clause union in date column

  Hi gems... good evening...
  
  Oracle version: 11.2.0.2 EL6 Linux server
  
  I have a query as below:
  
  Select col1, col2, col3 col4
  tab1, tab2, tab3
  where the conditions
  Union
  Select col1, col2, col3 col4
  tab1, tab2, tab3
  where the conditions
  Union
  Select col1, col2, col3 col4
  tab1, tab2, tab3
  where the conditions;
  
  Now the col4 is a date column, and I need to order by on that entire result sets. I know that I can do (order of col4) (order by 4) or at the end of all of the query.
  
  But the problem is that the output is coming to Mon-dd-yyyy (i.e. 31-Dec-2012).
  
  I want each output in the format dd/mm/yyyy, so I need to use the function to_char.
  
  But in this case, I can't use the order by clause, because in this case it's get organized by character IE by 1,2,3,4,5 like that.
  
  How can I solve my problem... Please help... Thanks in advance.
  
  Published by: gogol on 3 November 2012 08:05

  Maybe - when you order by date column, she did it with a date internal representation so on exit you can use any date format you think appropriate

  select distinct
         col1,col2,col3,col4
    from (select col1,col2,col3,col4
            from tab1,tab2,tab3
           where conditions_1
              or conditions_2
              or conditions_3
         )
  

  Concerning

  Etbin

• Need help with regular expressions

  Hi all
  
  I need your help, because I have no ideas more...
  
  I have the following problem: in the column of the database table, I have the string with the names of files already uploaded to the database. For example: + File1_V01.txt +, + File1_v02.txt +, + File1_01_v01.txt +, etc. The string _vxx * + or _Vxx * + (non-case sensitive) represents the version of the file.
  
  Now the problem: I'll upload the file with the name + File1_v02.txt + (already exists in the table).
  If the file name already exists in the table the pl/sql function should get the name of the file with the following version number. In my case it takes + File1_v03.txt +.
  
  Is it possible to do this using SELECT with regular expressions?
  
  Best regards and thanks!

  with t as (
    select 'File_V05.txt' fn from dual union all
    select 'File_V04.txt' fn from dual union all
    select 'File2_v03.doc' fn from dual union all
    select 'File2_v115.doc' fn from dual union all
    select 'File2_v15.doc' fn from dual union all
    select 'File1_v03.doc' fn from dual union all
    select 'File1_v115.doc' fn from dual union all
    select 'File1_v999.doc' fn from dual union all
    select 'File2.doc' fn from dual union all
    select 'File2_v05.doc' fn from dual union all
    select 'File1_v01.txt' fn from dual union all
    select 'File1_v02.txt' fn from dual union all
    select 'File1_v1.txt' fn from dual union all
    select 'File1_v1.doc' fn from dual union all
    select 'File1_v2.txt' fn from dual union all
    select 'File2_v01.doc' fn from dual union all
    select 'File2_v02.doc' fn from dual union all
    select 'File1_ABC_v01_DEF.docx' fn from dual union all
    select 'File1_ABC_V02_ABC.docx' fn from dual union all
    select 'File1_ABC_v01_12_04_17.docx' fn from dual union all
    select 'ABC_V1_QWERT.pdf' fn from dual
  )
  
  select fn,
  case when fn!=fn_new then
   last_value(fn_new)
   over(partition by regexp_replace(upper(fn),'V[[:digit:]]+','') --(.*?V0*)([1-9]+)(\..*?)$
   order by nv
   rows between unbounded preceding and unbounded following
   )
  else fn
  end fn_new
  from (
      select
      case when v-1 <= 0 then fn
      else
             regexp_replace (fn,
                      '(_v|_V)(\d*)',
                      case
                      when length(substr(fn,v+1,p-v-1)+1) > (p-v-1)
                      then '\1'||to_char(substr(fn,v+1,p-v-1)+1)
                      else '\1'||lpad(substr(fn,v+1,p-v-1)+1,p- v-1,0)
                      end
             )
      end fn_new
      ,fn
      ,case when v-1 <= 0 then -1
       else
          substr(fn,v+1,p- v-1)+1
       end nv
      from (
          select fn, regexp_instr(upper(fn),'_V[[:digit:]]+',1,1,1) p, instr(upper(fn),'_V')+1 v from t
      )
  )
  order by fn
  
  FN     FN_NEW
  ABC_V1_QWERT.pdf     ABC_V2_QWERT.pdf
  File_V04.txt     File_V06.txt
  File_V05.txt     File_V06.txt
  File1_ABC_v01_DEF.docx     File1_ABC_v02_DEF.docx
  File1_ABC_v01_12_04_17.docx     File1_ABC_v02_12_04_17.docx
  File1_ABC_V02_ABC.docx     File1_ABC_V03_ABC.docx
  File1_v01.txt     File1_v3.txt
  File1_v02.txt     File1_v3.txt
  File1_v03.doc     File1_v1000.doc
  File1_v1.doc     File1_v1000.doc
  File1_v1.txt     File1_v3.txt
  File1_v115.doc     File1_v1000.doc
  File1_v2.txt     File1_v3.txt
  File1_v999.doc     File1_v1000.doc
  File2.doc     File2.doc
  File2_v01.doc     File2_v116.doc
  File2_v02.doc     File2_v116.doc
  File2_v03.doc     File2_v116.doc
  File2_v05.doc     File2_v116.doc
  File2_v115.doc     File2_v116.doc
  File2_v15.doc     File2_v116.doc
  

• ORA-00907: lack the right parenthesis when using Group by clause with xmlagg

  I have the following query and I am getting ORA-00907 error when I use the clause with the xmlagg function group.

  select xmlelement("Mitigation",
                  xmlelement("m_szMethodName",tm.DisplayName),
                  xmlelement("SubstanceInterferenceProtocolList",
                              (select xmlagg(xmlelement("MitigationProtocol",
                                      xmlelement("m_szMethodName",tm.DisplayName),
                                      xmlelement("m_szInterferenceProtocolName",tmp.protocol_name),
                                      xmlelement("m_szInterferenceSubstance",tmp.intf_mtrl_prod_code),
                                      xmlelement("m_ProtocolParameters",
                                          xmlelement("m_szProtocolName",tmp.protocol_name),
                                              xmlelement("m_Consumables",
                                                  xmlelement("Consumable",
                                                      xmlelement("m_szConsumId", xrl.rgnt_pack_name),
                                                      xmlelement("m_szProductCode",xrl.pack_prod_code),
                                                      xmlelement("m_nVolume",tmp.fluid_vol),
                                                      xmlelement("m_szProtocolStep",xps.protocol_step_name))),
                                                  xmlelement("m_ProtParamList",
                                                      xmlagg(
                                                      xmlelement("ParameterValues",
                                                          xmlelement("m_szProtocolName",tmp.protocol_name),
                                                          xmlelement("m_Time",xpsd.parameter_ntime_value))
                                                      group by tmp.ccd_test_id,tmp.intf_mtrl_prod_code)
                  )))
                  order by tmp.ccd_test_id, tmp.intf_mtrl_prod_code, xps.protocol_step_intprotocolstep )
                  from XPR_tdef_mitigation_protocol tmp, xp_reagentlist xrl,
                  xpr_protocol_settings xps, xpr_protocol_settings_default xpsd
                  where tmp.ccd_test_id = tm.ccd_test_id
                  and tmp.ccd_test_id = xrl.ccd_test_id
                  and tmp.pack_prod_code = xrl.pack_prod_code
                  and tmp.intf_type = 1
                  and xps.protocol_name = xpsd.protocol_name
                  and xps.protocol_step_name = xpsd.protocol_step_name
                  and xps.ps_action_parameterlist = xpsd.ps_action_parameterlist
                  and xps.protocol_name =  tmp.PROTOCOL_NAME
                  )))
  from XPtoXPRTdef_defn_mapping tm
  where tm.DisplayName = 'SYPH'

  If I remove the clause xmlagg and the group by clause, the query works well and not give me the result.
  But in this code XML, the output format is incorrect for my application.
  
  Could someone help out here?

  Now my problem is that this unique coating is more than 32767 characters and utl_file can write 32767 bytes per line.
  Someone deal with this?

  Serialize the output as CLOB and DBMS_XSLPROCESSOR.clob2file procedure used to write to a file:

  DECLARE
    xml_output CLOB;
  BEGIN
    SELECT XMLElement("Department",
             XMLAgg(
               XMLElement("Employee",e.job_id||' '||e.last_name)
               ORDER BY e.last_name
             )
           ).getClobVal() AS "Dept_list"
    INTO xml_output
    FROM hr.employees e
    WHERE e.department_id = 30 OR e.department_id = 40;
  
    DBMS_XSLPROCESSOR.clob2file(xml_output, 'XML_DIR', 'test.xml');
  END;
  /