Problem with order by clause

Similar Questions

• Problem with REPLACING the clause in Sybase

  I am facing a problem with REPLACING the clause in embedded SQL with a Sybase database.
  
  My Cold Fusion Server is MX 7.
  
  The database is the Adaptive Enterprise/12.5.0.3/EBF 10689 IR/P/Sun_svr4/OS Server 5.8/rel12503/1915/64-bit/FBO/Thu 23 Jan 16:05:19 2003
  
  That is the problem. I have a variable bureau_incode of Cold Fusion, which I use to set the values in my IN clause. When I comment on my request and display this value in the HTML page, bureau_incode has the following value:
  
  ('TAB', 'OGC', 'BIG', 'OLA', "MDG", "SEO", "OSP", "ANOTHER OWD ',' ', 'PSHSB", "CAT", "WTB")
  
  My CFQUERY embedded SQL looks like this:
  
  

  Quote:
  < name cfquery = "qResults" datasource = "#request.dsn #" >
  Select Name,
  bureau_code,
  Telephone,
  Mobile phone,
  Pager,
  E-mail
  Availability,
  Explanation,
  Password,
  Admin,
  last_login = convert (varchar (20), last_login, 0)
  of PAMS where availability = ' don't
  < #request.seltype # cfif IS NOT "ALL" >
  and bureau_code IN #bureau_incode #.
  < / cfif >
  < / cfquery >

• Problem with Order by

  Hello everyone
  
  I am an Oracle Developer, and I have a problem with an order by clause.
  
  I have a column varchar2 with numeric values and alfanumeric
  For example, I have the following values in the column that I applied the order of: 1,2,3, A, B, C
  
  When I do next

  Select column_ord From my_table Order by ASC column_ord;

  The result is:
  A, B, C, 1, 2, 3
  
  With the following:

  Select column_ord From my_table Order by column_ord desc;

  The result is:
  3,2,1, C, B, A
  
  I Don t udestand this result, because I think that the result should be as follows:

  Select column_ord From my_table Order by ASC column_ord;

  The result is:
  1,2,3, A, B, C
  
  
  I work with Oralce 10 g ver: 10.2.0.1. and I tried this in Toad and sql * more
  
  Appreciate the help, greetings
  Miguel att.
  
  Published by: Miguel Balderas on 30/03/2011-14:04

  Hi Miguel,.

  Check your session nls_sort setting in this selection: SELECT * FROM v$ nls_parameters;

  For your desirable result, try this: ALTER SESSION SET NLS_SORT = "BINARY";

  Santiago González

• Problem with order submit data record for Reporting ATG

  Hi, r. j. Nunes

  I am facing problems with the connection to present newspapers for ATG of the report. The logs for RegistrationFileLogger, SiteVisitFileLogger, UserFileLogger, SegmentFileLogger were successfully getting generated but unable to see the logs for OrderFileLogger during shipment of the order.

  I understand that the/atg/reporting/datacollection/trade/SubmitOrderEventListener of the listener must be notified so that the listeners of corresponding data is called in the order:

  SubmitOrderEventListener-> OrderLogEntryQueueSink-> OrderLogEntryGenerator-> OrderFileLogger

  and newspapers would be written.

  But I'm not able to determine which component notifies the SubmitOrderEventListener by submitting an order.

  
  

  Is - this SendFulfillmentMessage component? But SendFulfillmentMessage sends the message to the localdms topic: / local/realization/LocalSubmitOrder on the port of OrderSubmitPort which as component SubmitOrderEventListener listen the subject localdms: / local/realization/LocalSubmitOrder on the DEFAULT port?

  
  

  Could someone please clarify.

  Thank you

  Saud

  Hello

  Pipelinelink = "sendFulfillmentMessage" name has been commented to our commercepipeline.xml that we did not use OOTB Presse. Once I removed the comment, sent messages and newspapers to submit order got generated.

  Thank you

  Saud

• Problem with order?

  I had some problems with a po recipes.
  I create a purchase order, but I can´t see it in some organizations. the ship of the organization is the main element of the organization.

  Sorry, I'm not a functional person so I can't offer much help.

  You have consulted the documentation? -http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B53825_08/current/html/doclist.html#Purchasing_p

  If you still have the same problem, then you can save a SR.

  Thank you
  Hussein

• Need help with order by clause row_number() Fn

  with t as
  (
   select 123 id, 'brwr' lstatus from dual
   union all
   select 123 id, 'ca' lstatus from dual
   union all
   select 123 id, 'fac' lstatus from dual
   union all
   select 345 id, 'ca' lstatus from dual
   union all
   select 345 id, 'brwr' lstatus from dual
   union all
   select 567 id, 'brwr' lstatus from dual
   union all
   select 789 id, 'brwr' lstatus from dual
   union all
   select 1011 id, 'fac' lstatus from dual
  union all
   select 1011 id, 'xyz' lstatus from dual
  )select id,lstatus,row_number() over(partition by id order by lstatus)rw
   from t;

  Desired output
  

  id           lstatus       rn
  
  123         brwr         3
  123         ca          1
  123         fac         2
  345         ca          1
  345         brwr         2
  567         brwr         1
  789         brwr         1
  1011         fac        1
  1011  xyz         2

  That is, my first priority is to 'ca', then 'College '.
  
  I am aware that this can be done through the use of CASE within the order by clause
  but could not find the logic of the apt.
  
  Please help me.

  A solution just for data given to samples...

  with t as
  (
   select 123 id, 'brwr' lstatus from dual
   union all
   select 123 id, 'ca' lstatus from dual
   union all
   select 123 id, 'fac' lstatus from dual
   union all
   select 345 id, 'ca' lstatus from dual
   union all
   select 345 id, 'brwr' lstatus from dual
   union all
   select 567 id, 'brwr' lstatus from dual
   union all
   select 789 id, 'brwr' lstatus from dual
   union all
   select 1011 id, 'fac' lstatus from dual
  union all
   select 1011 id, 'xyz' lstatus from dual
  )select id,lstatus,row_number() over(partition by id order by (case  when lstatus <> 'brwr' THEN UPPER(lstatus) else lstatus end)) rw
   from t;
  

  Basically, it shows how to use the CASE statement. You can change based on your actual data.

  Concerning
  Arun

• Problem with order of clip

  This is a question and request for suggestions.
  I'm very new to using first Pro CS4 using VideoStudio for a long time. But due to a mutitude of bug and constant crashes, I just let fall on her and made the transition to the first.

  I begin to develop projects of AVCHD clips. My camera creates each scene as a file. With VideoStudio I had to use TSmuxeR to merge them into a single clip, otherwise it would just fall more take hours (literally) to start because she wanted to check each hook. When you have hunderds in a project it is a problem.

  Prime Minister handles this much better doing things in the background, but I had some problems with clips are reordered. Maybe my approach is all wrong and I'm open to suggestions.

  For example, I break the clips in segments that relate to a topic and put in a bin. So, in a project, I would have 700 clips into 10 bins with 50 to 100 clips in each location. And I might have a dozen projects which constitute a 'production '. But when I import clips (IE windows) the last clip always happens to be the first imported. It is a common windows problem which I do not know how to move. In any case, when it gets imported I then rearrange clips. Clips from your device name is a time code date as 20100514082312.mts which is unique and you can order by date very easily, but it is really hard to read.

  The problem that I seem to have if I take a bin (that' it'sbeen sort) and drag it to the timeline, the last clip gets always inserted first. I guess that the Prime Minister is to remember the order that the clips had import and not how I trie in the bins.

  Because I tend to move things around a lot, it is a concern to keep deting first clips and then put on the end of the sequence, etc..

  Is there a way to get around this? As do enforcement in the stick of bins, or order the clips by name in the time line or maybe bring imported in the correct order in the first place?

  Or is the way I'm doing this all wrong. I admit it's hard to give up the way I did things in VideoStudio which could impose some bad habits.

  There is something else you can try - select the media and to automate for the timeline. You can tell it to not add transitions and do not overlap, and there are options to overlay the clips in the order of sorting or the order of selection. Try to select clips in the order of your choice.

  If there is something else in the trash you want, like a sequence, you may need to select all, uncheck what you want and then automate.

• Cannot wrap a select with order by clause in a file.

  TOGETHER SET TERMOUT OFF FEEDBACK OFF PAGESIZE 0 400 LINESIZE ECHO OFF OFF POSITION

  coil & 1;

  Select "EMPID, EMP_NAME, REGION, FROM, TO, MONTH, ACTIVITY_TYPE, PROJECT_PIN, MILESTONE_NAME, PRACTICE_ID, RESOURCE_CATEGORY, HOURS, COMMENT, percent ALLOCATION, INVOICE_TO, the STATE of the double"

  Union of all the

  select empid,resource_name,region,week_of,(week_of+7),core_month,bill_rate,project_name,project_type,milestone_name,practice_id,resource_category,total_hours_submitted,project_type,"%ALLOCATION",invoice_to,status from master_emp_allocation order by week_of;

  spool off;

  "exit";

  /

  the above block gives result below

  select empid,resource_name,region,week_of,(week_of+7),core_month,bill_rate,project_name,project_type,milestone_name,practice_id,resource_category,total_hours_submitted,project_type,"%ALLOCATION",invoice_to,status from master_emp_allocation order by week_of

  *

  ERROR at line 3:

  ORA-00904: "WEEK_OF": invalid identifier

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Without the order by clause it wraps the file passed as an argument.

  check

  Combining the UNION AGENDA and BY

  Columns in the ORDER BY list must be a subset of the columns in the selection list on the left side of the union.

  All the columns in the ORDER BY list should be sorted in ascending order, and they must be a prefix in the order of the columns in the target of the left side of the UNION list.

• problem with order 40470 themes from adobe for muse

  Hi, I have a problem with a template I received topic of adobe, nr.40470. the problem is that when I preview the page in the browser, the text is on the right side of the chassis. I deleted and reinstalled the model several times but still the same error

  Hi A and C,

  Try to increase the size of the TextBox for a better analysis and share a link to your site.

  Kind regards

  Akshay

• Help with order by clause

  Hello
  
  I have a table with the data below, when I run my select with order option gives me
  1 card
  
  as a first line, but I need it
  12 atm
  
  as the first line, how this is possible.
  
  
  
  create table test
  (Identification number,
  Val varchar2 (20)
  )
  
  
  insert into test values (1, 'Card')
  Insert test values (2, ' map')
  Insert test values (3, ' map')
  
  Insert test values (4, 'cash')
  Insert test values (5, 'Cash')
  Insert test values (6, 'cash')
  
  Insert test values (7, "Checque")
  Insert test values (8, "Checque")
  Insert test values (9, "Checque")
  
  Insert test values (10, 'atm')
  insert into test values (11, 'atm')
  Insert test values (12, 'atm')
  
  
  
  Select * from test
  order by ASC of val

  Or try again with

   select * from test order by upper(val) asc, id desc 
  

• ORA-00904 ROW_NUMBER, problem with ORDER BY id

  Hello world
  
  I use Oracle 9i, I use ROW_NUMBER and I got the ORA-00904 because of the ORDER BY identifier.
  

  SELECT      * 
  FROM      (SELECT c.id_comp, 
            c.nom, 
            c.id_type_comp, 
            c.libelle, 
            c.standard, 
            c.id_comp_std, 
            c.id_comp_grp, 
            (SELECT      t.nom 
            FROM      type_composant t 
            WHERE      t.id_type_comp=c.id_type_comp ) 
            AS      nom_type_comp , 
            (SELECT t.libelle 
            FROM      type_composant t 
            WHERE      t.id_type_comp=c.id_type_comp ) 
            AS      libelletype, 
            (SELECT cc.nom 
            FROM      composant cc 
            WHERE      cc.id_comp=c.id_comp_std ) 
            AS      nom_comp_std, 
            (SELECT ccc.nom 
            FROM      composant ccc 
            WHERE      ccc.id_comp=c.id_comp_grp ) 
            AS      nom_comp_grp, 
            ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY nom_type_comp) R 
       FROM composant c) 
  WHERE      nom LIKE '%' 
  AND      R BETWEEN 0 and 200 
  ORDER BY nom_type_comp;

  And here is the error:
  

   ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY nom_type_comp) R FROM composant c)
                                      *
  ERROR at line 25:
  ORA-00904: "NOM_TYPE_COMP": invalid identifier

  Apparently, it takes the pseudonym I use. I tried with the query instead of the alias, and it worked. Is there a way to do it with the alias because I would use a variable with my ORDER BY.
  
  Any help would be nice!
  
  Andalusians
  
  Published by: Guich may 12, 2011 10:40

  You may not use an alias defined on the same query plan.
  The alias must be from a subquery.
  Such as:

  SELECT      *
  FROM      (select my_table.*, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY nom_type_comp) R
           from  (SELECT c.id_comp,
                   c.nom,
                   c.id_type_comp,
                   c.libelle,
                   c.standard,
                   c.id_comp_std,
                   c.id_comp_grp,
                   (SELECT      t.nom
                   FROM      type_composant t
                   WHERE      t.id_type_comp=c.id_type_comp ) AS      nom_type_comp ,
                   (SELECT t.libelle
                   FROM      type_composant t
                   WHERE      t.id_type_comp=c.id_type_comp ) AS      libelletype,
                   (SELECT cc.nom
                   FROM      composant cc
                   WHERE      cc.id_comp=c.id_comp_std ) AS      nom_comp_std,
                   (SELECT ccc.nom
                   FROM      composant ccc
                   WHERE      ccc.id_comp=c.id_comp_grp ) AS      nom_comp_grp
              FROM composant c) my_table)
  WHERE      nom LIKE '%'
  AND      R BETWEEN 0 and 200
  ORDER BY nom_type_comp;
  

  Nicolas.

• Strange problem with order of cursor on Satellite P100-160

  On my brand new laptop P100-160 with MS Vista Premium, I have an annoying error. Frequently, but without a reason, when I point the cursor on a command and press the touch screen go to the Maximum or to the Minimum size if it's to the Max, but the command is not executed. This happens on all programs, that is to say, words, Excel, games, etc.. I'm away from the United Kingdom and the store where I bought the laptop so resume the shop is not an option.

  Anyone else see this fault or can anyone suggest a solution?

  "It's not a bug, it's a feature!"

  Discover the taskbar when using the touchpad. There is an animated icon beside the clock touchpad. Click twice, and then on the top left device options and on the options again. There, you can spend some time and read about all the flaws of your touchpad - also how you can disable them.

  Have fun.

• Problem with order by Date

  Apex 3.2

  I have a report based on a collection, but the ranking of start_date and end_date does not work.

  Select

  C002 start_date,

  C003 end_date,

  -start_date to_char (to_date (c002, 'dd.mm.yyyy'), 'dd.mm.yyyy'),

  -End_date to_char (to_date (c003, 'dd.mm.yyyy'), 'dd.mm.yyyy'),

  C004 conversion_factor,

  SI.apskey SMI,

  SI.longdescr Description

  to apex_collections, if udm_si

  where si.siid = c001

  and collection_name = "SMI_INSERT_COL."

  I tried

  C002 start_date,

  C003 end_date

  and put exact in the formatting of column

  I tried

  start_date to_char (to_date (c002, 'dd.mm.yyyy'), 'dd.mm.yyyy'),

  -End_date to_char (to_date (c003, 'dd.mm.yyyy'), 'dd.mm.yyyy'),

  with no formatting of column

  I also tried

  start_date to_char ("c002, ' dd.mm.yyyy")

  but I get an error

  error report:

  ORA-01722: invalid number

  Gus

  Some previous threads please refer to "-" the origin of this. Try to split the "-"s: ".

  ' ': apex_item.display_and_save (2, c002)

• Problem with a Where Clause in report

  Hi all
  
  I have a simple report on the EMP table with a form of parameter to select employees of a particular or all departments.
  It works fine if I'm in one or all the departments in the report. The SQL code for the report is the following:
  
  SELECT
  EMPNO,
  ENAME,
  HIREDATE,
  SAL,
  DEPTNO
  Of
  EMP
  WHERE
  DEPTNO LIKE "%" | : P68_DEPTNO | » %'
  
  Now, I have added another element of setting labeled "category". If you select the category 'OFFICE', she must return employees of departments 10 and 20, if selected from category 'FIELD', he has to return employees to Department 30 and 40. But if you select the category ALL then he must return the employees of all departments.
  
  Anyone would be able to advise me on the correct approach to achieve the above?
  
  You can view the report by clicking on this link: http://apex.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=43368:68
  
  Thank you
  Zahid
  
  Published by: Zahid Khan on April 15, 2009 16:20

  Something like:

  SELECT
  EMPNO,
  ENAME,
  HIREDATE,
  SAL,
  DEPTNO
  Of
  EMP
  WHERE
  DEPTNO LIKE "%" | : P68_DEPTNO | » %'
  AND
  ((: P68_CATEGORY = 'OFFICE' AND deptno IN (10,20)))
  OR (: P68_CATEGORY = 'FIELD' AND deptno IN (30, 40))
  OR: P68_CATEGORY = "ALL".
  )

  But what happens if the user chooses the category OFFICE and Deptno 30? What needs to happen next? The query above will return any given - no one is in the two 30 and Department 10 or 20!

• Problem in the SQL because of the order by clause

  Hi all
  I am facing a problem in a sql query. I use Oracle 10 g 2.
  Query is given below:
  

  SELECT t1.ename
          FROM T1, T2
         WHERE T1.EMPNO = 1234
           AND T1.ACCOUNTNO = T2.ACCOUNTNO
           AND T1.SEQ = T2.SEQ
         ORDER BY T2.SEQ

  The query Plan is:
  

  .----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  | Id  | Operation                     | Name                 | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT              |                      |     2 |   218 | 11716   (1)| 00:00:41 |
  |*  1 |  TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID  | T1                   |     1 |    89 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
  |   2 |   NESTED LOOPS                |                      |     2 |   218 | 11716   (1)| 00:00:41 |
  |*  3 |    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T2                   |     2 |    40 | 11715   (1)| 00:00:41 |
  |   4 |     INDEX FULL SCAN           | PK_T2_SEQ            | 58752 |       |   122   (5)| 00:00:01 |
  |*  5 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN           | FK_ACCOUNTNO         |     3 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |
   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Now, I want to reduce the time of this request.
  
  If I remove order by clause query that the query performance is quite perfect, but with order by clause its take time.
  
  I already set SORT_AREA_SIZE, but still nothing improves.
  
  Welcome and thank you for your suggestions.
  
  Thank you
  
  Published by: BluShadow on June 23, 2011 07:55
  addition of {noformat}

  {noformat} tags and formatted explain plan to make it readable.  Please see {message:id=9360002} for details on how to post code and data                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            

  Hey, a quick test, try:

  select ename from (
  SELECT t1.ename, T2.SEQ
  FROM T1, T2
  WHERE T1.EMPNO = 1234
  AND T1.ACCOUNTNO = T2.ACCOUNTNO
  AND T1.SEQ = T2.SEQ
  and rownum > 0)
  ORDER BY SEQ
  

  Amiel Davis