Order of query

Similar Questions

• How to order a query by a column added by using QueryAddColumn()?

  I have a query ("GetTotals"). I add a column it is else the query ("GetTheList") using the standard code:

  < CFSET myArray = ArrayNew (1) >

  < cfloop query = "GetTheList" >

  < CFSET TotalJobs = GetTheList.Total >

  < CFSET x = ArrayAppend (myArray, TotalJobs) >

  < / cfloop >

  < CFSET x = QueryAddColumn (GetTotals, "Total", "VarChar", myArray) >

  < CFOUTPUT QUERY = "GetTotals" > what shows how I need.

  Except for one problem: how to control the output by the added column?

  Simple re-order (below) works for a column only, but not for all of them.

  < cfquery name = "ResortQuery", dbtype = "query" >

  SELECT *.

  OF GetTotals

  ORDER BY DESC totals

  < / cfquery >

  
  

  Any ideas are appreciated!

  Not quite sure what you mean by "works for a column only, but not for all the'.»»  You add more columns?  Or that you're also wanting to make secondary classification, for example have ordered them totals, and then by name?

  If for example your query is already ordered the name, you added your new column of totals.  You should be able to:

  SELECT *.

  OF GetTotals

  ORDER BY DESC, Name ASC totals
  

       

  
  

  PS: when you use to call functions like this, you don't have to assign them to a variable:

  
  

  arrayAppend returns a Boolean value, queryAddColumn returns an integer indicating the number of the new column.  In most cases, these values are not used; You can simply do:

  
  

• Error in query of the ordered result query contained CFSCRIPT in CF10

  I came across a very interesting error when you perform a query of a query within a CFSCRIPT tag...

  I get a result in withdrawal of a SQL Server stored procedure.  This is a list of metric names (METRIC_ID) and the metric measures themselves.

  I need to pull the METRIC_ID for this outcome, plans to make a JOIN on another query having display and other attributes of formatting for display in a web page.

  The following code runs without error when the query is not ordered:

  var displayDataQuery = new Query();

  displayDataQuery.setName ("joinedQuery");

  displayDataQuery.setDBType ("query");

  displayDataQuery.setAttributes (qry1 = fullMetricsListQuery);

  displayDataQuery.setAttributes (qry2 = arguments.cubeData);

  displayDataQuery.setSQL ("SELECT METRIC_ID FROM qry2");

  var tempResultSet = displayDataQuery.execute ();

  var cubeMetricIDList = tempResultSet.getResult ();

  When I take the same results of exact query of the same stored procedure, but it is controlled by an ORDER BY clause, this statement;

  var tempResultSet = displayDataQuery.execute ();

  get the following error: "value" cannot be converted to a number.»   It is 2 apostrophes, meaning an empty string between 'value' and 'impossible.'

  
  

  Wait, what?  I want to just a list of names metrics, varchars.  Why is there a conversion error...?

  
  

  The error in the end pprovided back to ColdFusion10\cfusion\CustomTags\com\adobe\coldfusion\base.cfc, line 445

  OK, this is where it takes an interesting twist...

  Starting at line 444, in base.cfc, line 445 bolded in red:

  "< cfif sqlType NEQ" "and arraylen (sqlParams) gt 0 >."

  < cfloop index = "i" = "2" to = "#ArrayLen (sqlArray) #" >

  < arraylen (sqlParams) of lte cfif (i-1) >

  < cfqueryparam attributeCollection = "#sqlParams [i-1] #" / >

  < / cfif >

  #getPreserveSingleQuotes (sqlArray [i]) #.

  < / cfloop >

  < / cfif >

  So if I understand correctly, when I have a query, unordered, copy the following code in base.cfc bed the SQL code in displayDataQuery.setSQL ("SELECT METRIC_ID FROM qry2"), but is not when the query is controlled by METRIC_ID... ?

  Oh, wait... the CFDUMP when using an ordered set of data says something else...

  query
  RESULTSET
  CACHING	fake
  EXECUTIONTIME	4
  SQL	SELECT * FROM qry1 ORDER OF METRIC_ID, LOCATION

  I'm a bit confused why the same data in works set ordered, while an ordered set causes this error.

  All useful suggestions or clues would be greatly appreciated!

  Do you mean that the error has occurred without the order by clause?

  Given that the error only occurs with one unsorted data set, I'm a bit confused why you ask this...?

  I've followed your suggestion:

  Run the same code, but use the cfquery instead of cfscript tag. The error persists there?

  My assumption was that your suggestion is to test it against a set of ordered data because that is what caused the original error.

  Unfortunately, the error occurs in the scenarios the tag and script-based.

  There is absolutely no sense why this happens.  The order of a set of data should have no impact on a query of a query on a column defined as varchar.

  If there are null values in the other columns defined as a type of digital, big deal, the code in question does not seek to assess these columns.  Still more interesting thing is why disorderly orderly vs makes a difference.

• ORDER BY query

  Hi all
  

  select emp_id,emp_name,doj from employees order by doj desc;  

  This query must sort my reports in descending order, as recently happened to the employee must be displayed on the top, I tried this query in sql workshop and it shows employees in descending order, but in the reports page its been not show accordingly! It displays in a random order.
  
  Pointers?
  
  Thanks in advance

  You do not to specify the ORDER BY in IR

  1. create the IR without ORDER OF
  2. run the IR
  3. click on Actions - Format - sorting. Set your sort here order and apply
  4. click on Action - save report and Save as default report parameter

  Kind regards

• Order of query clause

  Hello
  Here's the example query.
  with t1 as)
  Select 1 as id, 'aa' as the name of double
  Union
  Select 2, 'a2' of the double
  Union
  Select 3, 'qe' from dual
  Union
  Select option 4, 'ee' from dual
  Union
  Select 5, are ' double
  Union
  Select 6, 'tt' from dual
  Union
  Select 8, 'kl' double)
  SELECT id, name from t1 where id in (6,2,12,5,1)
  
  the result obtained
  
  ID NA
  ---------- --
  1 aa
  2 a2
  5 re
  TT 6
  
  But I need results in order (as in the values clause ic (6,2,12,5,1))
  ID NA
  ---------- --
  TT 6
  2 a2
  5 re
  1 aa
  
  Is this possible?
  
  Thank you
  Sujnan

  You can, but you'll need to duplicate the data in the clause of a DECODING (or CASE) statement IN

  SQL> ed
  Wrote file afiedt.buf
  
    1  with t1 as (
    2  select 1 as id, 'aa' as name from dual
    3  union
    4  select 2, 'a2' from dual
    5  union
    6  select 3, 'qe' from dual
    7  union
    8  select 4, 'ee' from dual
    9  union
   10  select 5, 're' from dual
   11  union
   12  select 6, 'tt' from dual
   13  union
   14  select 8, 'kl' from dual)
   15  select id,name
   16    from t1
   17   where id in (6,2,12,5,1)
   18*  order by decode( id, 6, 1, 2, 2, 12, 3, 5, 4, 1, 5 )
  SQL> /
  
          ID NA
  ---------- --
           6 tt
           2 a2
           5 re
           1 aa
  

  Justin

• Content by query order

  I use the CMIS query to a content query:
  
  SELECT cmis:name from cmis:document WHERE IN_TREE('/AcqUCM/IDC:Folder/687225755214001010') ORDER BY cmis:name ASC
  
  I get an error message:
  
  Caused by: oracle.webcenter.content.integration.cmis.query.ParseException: May 23, 2011 15:45:19 oracle.webcenter.content.integration.cmis.query.VcrExpressionSearchDelegate registerOrderBy
  GRAVE: Not classifiable property: cmis:name.
  
  How can I order my query results?
  
  Thank you
  Mitch

  Try this:

  select * from ora:t:IDC:GlobalProfile WHERE IN_TREE('/AcqUCM/IDC:Folder/687225755214001010')  ORDER BY ora:p:dDocTitle ASC
  

  or

  SELECT cmis:name from cmis:document WHERE IN_TREE('/AcqUCM/IDC:Folder/687225755214001010') ORDER BY ora:p:dDocTitle ASC
  

  One thing you can check is in the UCM metadata fields are available, but I think that dDocName and dDocTitle are available by default.
  It is possible that you could meet the indexer for the AAU. This can be done in the admin cmdlets in Complutense University of MADRID. If you don't know how, I'll give you more details tomorrow when I have a server of the University Complutense of MADRID.

  Published by: Yannick Ongena May 23, 2011 22:29

• Order General questioning of IEC 60870-5-104

  Dear all,

  I use the NI Communications toolkit to create slave IEC 60870-5-104 (station controlled).

  I use s/w of Triangel microworks part and use it as the master for the same. I am able to send and receive the bulk of orders with the examples provided with the Toolkit to "C:\Program NIUninstaller Instruments\LabVIEW 2012\examples\IEC60870-5,

  I am not able to find a way to capture the "questioning general command" from the server.

   

  Can someone help me how to proceed with this.

  Thank you.

  Hi Frabto,

  The development team has had some great insights below. I have bad informed you (sorry!) behavior, that the command general question should be processed automatically in the communication stack.

  First the order of query sent to control the station may request the complete(station interrogation) or a subset (group interview) of all the data points on the control station. NEITHER 60870-5 to the command station supports the command when the control station receives an order of questioning of the station, it will reply with all the values of the data points. If the Group interrogation command, it will reply with the values of the data points that belong to the group. Users are not able to detect whether the query command is received or not, is automatically handled inside the battery, it allows users of the VI called "Set Group.vi" inside the VI polymorphic "set Property.vi" to set a point to be one of the 16 groups and you can see the usage with the example 'Interrogate information in Group.vi objects' in the folder of the example 60870-5.

  You shouldn't need to do anything to respond to a command of the interrogation. The station will automatically answer. I hope that I did not cause you too much confusion on this point.

• Order by with Union

  select level as lvl --,1 as ordered 
  from dual
  connect by level <=5
  union all
  select rownum as lvl --,2 as ordered  
  from dual
  connect by level <=5 
  

  How to order the query after the UNION ALL clause in descending order

  My expected results

  1

  2

  3

  4

  5

  5

  4

  3

  2

  1

  Select * from (select level as lvl-, 1 as ordered

  of the double

  connect by level<>

  order by 1)

  Union of all the

  Select * from (select rownum as -lvl 2 as he ordered

  of the double

  connect by level<>

  order by 1 desc)

• Order of the Gantt chart

  Hello

  I created a Gantt chart and discovered a problem. Jobs don't always appear in chronological order.

  I tried to order the query by date, but then the tasks don't always show next (or in the same order) on the bars to the right of the plan.

  Is anyway I can order the tasks without losing the alignment with the diagram of the individual task bar?

  Thanks in advance.

  Hello

  You have not specified what type of Gantt chart, you use: it is a project gantt chart or resource? In addition, you are dealing with hierarchical data?

  Looks like you might be dealing with hierarchical data and the order in which the data are generated is cause your problem and culminating in the timeline entries being out of alignment with the datagrid control.  So, without seeing the application in use, my suggestion would be to update the query to generate a hierarchical representation of your data via an START WITH... CONNECT BY question, using a syntax similar to the following:

  Select the link,
  TaskName,
  ID,
  parent_id,
  start_date,
  End_date,
  status
  tasks _table
  Start by parent_id is null
  connect by parent_id = prior id
  siblings arrested by start_date

  If the query is retrieving the list of tasks and then hierarchically by listing the based on parent-child association which was held in the PARENT_ID of the table column.  The end result means that each parent task is listed with their tasks associated with children and sorted by START_DATE.

  If this isn't answering your query, please update this thread with more information about your test scenario.  Even better - if you could create a unit test on apex.oracle.com and post a link to the unit test and the syntax of the query you are using, it would be very useful.

  Kind regards

  Hilary

• query: bulletin boards remove list

  I want to delete record of mother/parent/one table and delete dependent records in the child tables.
  For this, I would like to query for names of tables list in order (order) can I use to create delete clauses from the deepest children tables.
  How to write this query?
  My original query (the entrance is the name of table "List of GAMES"):

  SELECT PARENT, Child, LEVEL
  FROM (SELECT Parent_Table.Table_Name PARENT, Child_Table.Table_Name Child
        FROM all_Tables Parent_Table,
             all_Constraints Parent_Constraint,
             all_Constraints Child_Constraint,
             all_Tables Child_Table
        WHERE Parent_Table.Table_Name = Parent_Constraint.Table_Name
              AND Parent_Constraint.Constraint_Type IN ('P', 'U')
              AND Child_Constraint.r_Constraint_Name =
              Parent_Constraint.Constraint_Name
              AND Child_Constraint.Constraint_Type = 'R'
              AND Child_Table.Table_Name = Child_Constraint.Table_Name
              AND Child_Table.Table_Name != Parent_Table.Table_Name
              AND Parent_Constraint.Constraint_Type = 'P'
              AND Parent_Table.Table_Name != Child_Table.Table_Name)
  START WITH PARENT = 'GAMELIST'
  CONNECT BY PRIOR Child = PARENT;

  I don't know how to reproduce the query with the well known table name or the name of the system table, but this request appears in the 3rd LEVEL of depth, is column - this correct order just query "LEVEL DESC" and delete list of such order to produce?
  
  (Oracle 10g, Sun OS)

  Hello

  Yes; If table A reference table B, then A will appear at LEVEL = n and B appears to LEVEL =(n-1), then you need to remove the lines form the table with the first top-level.

  This approach does not work with cyclic dependencies, of course.
  What happens in the world does that mean? Take the example of an employee (as scott.emp) table and a department table (a little, but not exactly, like scott.dept). Each emp may be assigned to a Department, so there is a foreign key in emp SEO Dept. Now imagine that each Department has (at least) a spokeman, an employee. so the dept table might have a key referening foreign emp. If this query encounters such a loop, it will trigger the "ORA-01436: CONNECT LOOP is data user" error. Assuming that you get around to it, two tables may appear LEVEL = 1 (if that is what is happening in the START WITH clause), and the other will be at LEVEL = 2, but it is meaningless, since you can not just delete rows in each table in this case.

  Remember that the table names are not unique. You can put the owner of the table in the SELECT and START WITH clauses. Even if all the tables are now in a single schema, or you know who are the owners of all the tables, you do not change this query than the change of these conditions.

  If you create when foreign key with the ON DELETE CASCADE option, you can simply delete the parent rows, and all the children who make reference to this parent will be automatically deleted as well.

• "Order by" instruction Dynamics

  Hi guys,.
  
  I am trying to build a dynamic sql query in java (see below)
  

  sqlStr = "Select * " +
       "from " + tableName
  
  if(tableName!=null){
       if(tableName.equals("Table1"){
            sqlStr = sqlStr.concat("order by city desc");
       }else if(tableName.equals("Table2"){
            sqlStr = sqlStr.concat("order by country desc");
       }else if(tableName.equals("Table3"){
            sqlStr = sqlStr.concat("order by price desc");
       }
  }

  Now what I want to do is to add a final "else" statement that would order the query based on the question of if the table contains a column named "CustomerID". There will be several tables with this column, so I want to sort those who have this column by custID. (Rather than having hundreds of other if statements for each table that has only column name). Is this possible? I've seen people using "decode", but I can't work out how to use it here.
  
  Published by: ziggy 16 Sep, 2010 13:57

  Why you do not create your sqlStr through a procedure from tablename as an input parameter? For the satisfaction of your condition you must query the data dictionary and then generate your sqlStr.

  I don't have to if you can do it in Java.

  ... Vivek

• Query on the organized Table (IOT) Index sorts unnecessarily data

  I created hist3 to the table as follows:
  
  create table hist3)
  reference date,
  palette varchar2 (6).
  Artikel varchar2 (10),
  Menge number (10),
  status varchar2 (4).
  VARCHAR2 (20) text.
  VARCHAR2 (40) data.
  primary key constraint hist3_pk (reference, palette, artikel)
  )
  index of the Organization;
  
  The table being an IOT, I expect that the retrieval of rows in the same order as in the primary key must be very fast.
  
  This is true for the following query:
  
  SQL > select * from hist3 by reference;
  
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | 1000K | 82 M | 3432 (1) | 00:00:42 |
  | 1. INDEX SCAN FULL | HIST3_PK | 1000K | 82 M | 3432 (1) | 00:00:42 |
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  But if I add the following column of the primary key as a criterion of the order, the query becomes very slow.
  SQL > select * from hist3 by reference, palette;
  
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | TempSpc | Cost (% CPU). Time |
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | 1000K | 82 M | 22523 (1) | 00:04:31 |
  | 1. SORT ORDER BY | 1000K | 82 M | 200 M | 22523 (1) | 00:04:31 |
  | 2. FULL RESTRICTED INDEX SCAN FAST | HIST3_PK | 1000K | 82 M | 2524 (2) | 00:00:31 |
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  If I look at the execution plan, I don't understand why a SORT statement should be needed, as data already take the IOT in the order requested.
  
  Any thoughts?
  Thomas

  There are various ways how Oracle sorts VARCHARs.
  When you create an index on a VARCHAR column, sort order is binary.
  Try ' alter session set nls_sort = "BINARY" "and run your query."

• What happens if I don't know several target load order in advance?

  OWB always lets user to set a load order target for mapping that has multiple targets, what should I do if I don't know in advance the target load order?
  
  Load order sometimes target is determined by the source table (file) and change several times during execution according to the record in the source.
  
  A set of example of the record.csv of the source file data is defined as: (insert I:, U:update, delete D)
  Action, DateTime, key, name Desc
  I, 71520031200, ProdABC, ABC, ABC product
  I, 71520031201, CRC, ProdCDE, produces CDE
  I, 71520031202, XYZ, ProdXYZ, product XYZ
  U, 71620031200, ProdABC, ABC, ABC produced with option
  D, 71620032300, ProdABC, ABC, ABC produced with option
  I, 71720031200, ABC, ProdABC, former ProdABC reintroduced
  U, 71720031201, XYZ, ProdXYZ, rename XYZ
  
  You want to load the data into a target table as follows:
  DESCRIPTION OF THE NAME OF THE KEY SRC_TIMESTA
  CRC product ProdCDE CDE 71520031201
  71720031201 XYZ ProdXYZ rename XYZ
  ABC 71720031200, ProdABC former ProdABC reintroduced
  
  Solution: we define three targets, one for insert, delete and update.
  The order of loading for these targets are exactly the order in the file line by line, of the source, so order here are not determined, how instruct owb to load targets in the order of the records in the source?

  Agree with Dallan, you CAN get it works.

  Your flow of source table separator which has three external groups according to your flag field and you have three targets defined by type of operation. Don't worry about the definition of an explicit load order.

  For OWB to generate Code that works, on the configuration tab set:

  Block size = 1
  By default the operating Mode = line on
  Optimize the Code checked =
  Use the load order target = unchecked
  Bulk processing = Code checked
  Generation line Mode = on

  And the generated code SHOULD do what you want, scroll down your input in the order at a table and apply the proper functioning of this line.

  Now, if OWB keeps their code generating engine constant from one version to the other is debatable. Frankly, I would like to make a remark that future updates OWB would need to re - test this map.

  I should also mention that I am always wary of any implied order in a select statement, which assumes the code. It is expected that a "Select * from external_table" will bring back lines in the same order as the file. And he cursed well should!

  But no one has ever seen Oracle guarantees the order of query results when it is not explicitly specified in a clause "order by"?

  Me too.

  And given my distaste of uncertanty and assumptionms, I would say that IF the order of processing is a neccessity then I would add a pseudo-column RECNUM to the external table definition and order it before executing by the dispatcher to ensure this order.

  Mike

• order of Qs?

  prj_id project_name created by
  ============================
  1 orange
  2 apple
  3 jane Zhang
  4 joe cakes
  5 jason juno
  
  
  Basically, I want to order the query so
  (1) those who have hidden value "created by" will appear on the top and then order by project name
  (2) the rest that has the value ' create by "is classified by project name first, and then 'create '.
  
  
  the result I want to achieve is:
  
  prj_id project_name created by
  =============================
  2 apple
  1 orange
  4 joe cakes
  5 jason juno
  3 jane Zhang
  
  
  
  It is possible with sql query?

  This should work:

  WITH DATA AS (SELECT 1 prj_id, 'orange' project_name FROM DUAL
                UNION ALL
                SELECT 2 prj_id, 'apple' project_name FROM DUAL
               ),
       DATA2 AS (
                SELECT 3 prj_id, 'zoro' project_name, 'jane' created_by FROM DUAL
                UNION ALL
                SELECT 4 prj_id, 'cake' project_name, 'joe' created_by FROM DUAL
                UNION ALL
                SELECT 5 prj_id, 'juno' project_name, 'jason' created_by FROM DUAL
               )
  SELECT PRJ_ID,
         PROJECT_NAME,
         NULL,
         1
    FROM DATA
    UNION ALL
  SELECT PRJ_ID,
         PROJECT_NAME,
         CREATED_BY,
         DECODE(CREATED_BY, NULL, 1, 2)
    FROM DATA2
   ORDER BY 4,2,3
  

• bad sequence for "select xmlagg (...) "in... by..."

  The above statement, I get a forrest of XML nodes in the wrong order.

  I have a sequence of XML elements in a table:

  [Sorry for such things ' < span span > < time > < > < span > < span > > < "-I did not find a way to remove it]

  
  

  T5100 = 4, seqno = 1
  T5100 = 7, seqno = 2
  T5100 = 10, seqno = 3
  T5100 = 13, seqno = 4
  T5100 = 16, seqno = 5
  T5100 = 19, seqno = 6
  T5100 = 22, seqno = 7
  T5100 = 25, seqno = 8
  T5100 = 37, seqno = 9
  T5100 = 40, seqno = 10
  T5100 = 43, seqno = 11
  T5100 = 46, seqno = 12
  T5100 = 49, seqno = 13
  T5100 = 52, seqno = 14
  T5100 = 55, seqno = 15
  T5100 = 73, seqno = 16
  T5100 = 76, seqno = 17
  T5100 = 79, seqno = 18
  T5100 = 106, seqno = 19
  
  
  
  

  'T5100' is an XML attribute in the node root aggregate xmltype (column) of the source (just used here as a token) table (< SEG9510 >).

  'seqno' is a sequence number (column) of the same table in the source - which is used for the "order by".

  However, my result xmlserialize goes like this:

  <SEG9510 T5100="76"/>
  <SEG9510 T5100="79"/>
  <SEG9510 T5100="106"/>
  <SEG9510 T5100="4"/>
  <SEG9510 T5100="7"/>
  
  
  
  

  In fact, items out-of-sequence (76-79-106) are always some that appear at the beginning, but to the end (see above).

  And this subset located to evil itself is in order (76-79-106).

  For this, I was not sure if it's because of xmlagg (...) or xmlserialize (...).

  So, I picked up the 1st element of root XML result xmlagg (...) (via "excerpt") and registered separately:

  <SEG9510 T5100="76"/>
  
  
  
  

  So the question is on xmlagg (...).

  So what is wrong here?

  -Thanks a lot!

  Best regards

  Frank

  Your ORDER BY is moved.

  SELECT... ORDER BY ordering the query results. The way you wrote your query, data will be grouped by XMLAGG in no particular order and then XMLAGG results will be ordered. What you want is to classify data while aggregating. You need to add ORDER BY for XMLAGG:

  Select xmlagg (... Order by...) in...

  SY.