P2014H vs P2014Ht of regulatory compliance

Similar Questions

• [Aurora R4] I/O Board charge LED flashing

  The charge of the battery LED on my i/o board flashes and lights on the rear lights when the computer is off. So I guess that the rechargeable battery that powers the LED must be replaced, but it is where?

  After all this time, you have not yet downloaded your owner's manual?

  Theatre-lighting batteries

  (ALX chassis only)

  Alienware Aurora-R4 user manual

  Prerequisites

  Remove the batteries from theatre-lighting

  Theater-light battery replacement

  Postrequisites

  WARNING: Before working inside your computer, read the safety instructions shipped with your computer and follow the steps before you start. For additional safety best practices information, see the homepage of regulatory compliance information.

  Prerequisites

  1. remove the left side panel. See removing the left side panel.

  2 open the cover PCI. See the PCI for opening shroud.

  3. remove the fairing of the drive Bay. See removing the fairing of the drive Bay.

  Remove the batteries from theatre-lighting

  1. turn the fairing of the drive Bay.

  2. open the compartment of theatre-lighting.

  NOTE: Your computer comes with two Rechargeable AA batteries.

  3 remove the two batteries theatre-lighting.

• What is the difference between Cisco NAC and ACS?

  I am currently part of a new construction project and my Cisco account manager and sales engineer recommend Cisco NAC for our new MDF. I'm confused because I don't clearly know the difference between a Cisco ACS and the NAC. What is the difference?

  Thank you

  Chris

  Chris,

  The two are completely different, maybe the sales rep could present you with more information and application. Each offers a variety of services tailored to the specific needs. I think that we need to read more in depth on the proceeds of the NAC. NAC seems an excellent solution for authentication authorization but other regulatory compliance.

  When you see ask your representative to sales for more information/demo.

  ACS is more widely use as a central point to access control to network devices routers, an example is for acs accounting management and the authority to order on all devices on the network using acs as RADIUS server. Considering that the NAC is over a central point of safety inspection on earlier systems of access to your network by via LAN or outside, an example of these respected regulatory defined could be inspections could be virus definition checks before getting lan access thus preventing access to the LAN if the system does not have regulatory compliance defined in NAC access is denied. Another example could be the unknown local host connections etc... So, it seems that NAC is a much broader product that provides endpoint security internal, not only the authentication authorization as acs... ACS has been there for a long time, NAC is rather new product.

  NAC

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/NetSol/ns466/networking_solutions_package.html

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/solutions/collateral/ns340/ns394/ns171/ns466/ns617/net_qanda0900aecd800fdd6f_ns466_Networking_Solutions_Q_and_A.html

  ACS

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/sw/secursw/ps5338/index.html

  Rgds

  Jorge

• Level of risk profile necessary for HIPAA

  The VMware Security Hardening Guide says:

  "Risk Profile 2: guidelines should be implemented for the most sensitive environments, for example those who handle sensitive data, those subjected to stricter rules of respect, etc..".

  If I'm the target of HIPAA compliance, should I assume that I need to comply with profile of risk 2 on all points all least, or is not as simple as that?

  Hello

  You MUST comply with the HIPAA regulations, however, there is nothing in there everything exceeds these requirements. If you feel that the guidelines are for you, then by all means to implement. The regulation is the bare minimum required and defined by the general Committee.  If you feel more comfortable, appropriate, according to the laws HIPAA AND risk II profile can do both, but meeting the profile of risk II does NOT mean that meet you HIPAA regulations.

  Regulatory compliance is the starting point is not the end of the security. However the course being does not mean that you meet the requirements of regulatory compliance.

  The VCM team did a mapping for you. Go this way.  Or if you prefer use not VCM then you can use HyTrust, mocking and many others. Depending on the tool you use, be sure to trust you with their mappings. This trust is essential. Personally, before choosing a compliance assistance tool, talk to your compliance officer and see if they have heard of the tool or would recommend to others. If 'other' does not work in a virtual environment, you must begin to educate the compliance officer, because they need to understand before they audit for compliance.

  Best regards
  Edward L. Haletky
  VMware communities user moderator, VMware vExpert 2009-2015

  Author of the books ' VMWare ESX and ESXi in the business: Planning Server Virtualization Deployment, Copyright 2011 Pearson Education. ' Of VMware VSphere and Virtual Infrastructure Security: securing the virtual environment ', Copyright 2009 Pearson Education.

  Virtualization and Cloud Security Analyst: The Practice of virtualization, LLC - vSphere Upgrade Saga - virtualization security Table round Podcast

• I've updated to v10.0 version, now a specfic program that runs using a bowser does not work. The problem is when the program runs a compliance test the following error message is displayed in the test results: Test; Version of the browser, the Test result

  COMPLIANCE TEST
  Results of Test test
  Firefox browser
  Version 1 browser higher than 2.0 must
  Acrobat Reader Version 9.5.0.270
  Sun Java Plug-ins active true
  Java JAVA version
  JavaScript 1.8
  Flash Flash Player 11
  ERROR Please correct

  This program is probably only read 1 of the number 10 - IOW, it is not able to read a number with 2 digits before the decimal point.

  Contact the developer of this program and let them know that they have some Fixin ' to do.

  See the MP I send to you. See your Inbox at the top of the forum pages.

• Lack of regulatory framework on iPad

  Hello

  Why did the regulatory framework missing on some iPads and not others?  To find the regulation go you to setting > General > regulatory but on a few iPads the regulatory framework has not been established. I noticed on the other forum user ask a similar question, but all remain unanswered.

  Thank you. Carl

  Settings > general > regulations contains regulatory marks.

  Here's what it shows for my iPhone (the United States):

  

  As you can see, the displayed regulatory marks apply to some (but not all) countries.  I imagine that the devices for these other countries do not have this available in configurations view.

• NI 9265 compliance voltage

  Someone can give me a decent reason why voltage compliance on the NI 9265 is only 12V, but you can provide the map with 9-36VDC?  The process control industry REALLY want to know if there is any chance to update this one day.

  Maybe that's a problem for the exchange of ideas.  I could see where try it power several devices from a single loop could require higher compliance voltage.

  The distributed system that you refer to seems like an interesting challenge.

• IviSwtch specific Test IVI Driver compliance in CVI crashing

  I have problem with the IviSwtch-specific driver. I have finished all of the code for this driver and test in CVI specific tool called 'Test IVI Driver. " Structure and functioning of the special series of tests without any errors. Problem is with the compliance test that returns:

  the driver could not be initialized by the class driver.

  Compliance test was interrupted.
  Error returned: bffa0011
  Error message: function or method not supported.

  I tried to add dll exports based on this solution http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/1DCA138862E75119862576C5006EA144

  After doing this compliance test comes crashing down and I have to close.

  Someone met with such a problem? I would be grateful for any help.

  Concerning

  Tomasz

  > The format of DLL version is valid.

  ERROR: DLL version is incompatible with the version of the header file.

  All attributes have the exact names.

  All attributes have correct data types.

  This error means that the revision of the generated .dll does not match the version major and minor, defined in the header. This should not be a conern if you won't release the pilot to customers and that you take care of revision.

  > ERROR: the driver is not c > ompliant with the Inherent group because:

  -The following intrinsic attributes are not implemented:

  INSTRUMENT_MANUFACTURER
  INSTRUMENT_MODEL

  It is difficult to say the reason for the root of this problem, but there might be something does not work in your code. What is the definition of these powers? OR send your project to [email protected]. I think that NEITHER could help to take a look inside.

  Thank you

  Charles

• System Center 2012 - data from compliance software

  I have my installation of SCCM 2012 connected to a WSUS server.

  All updates are synchronized via SCCM perfectly, however none of the compliance data has been entered.

  Conformity assessment is enabled in the default settings of the client.

  I tried to force the recovery of these data by downloading the required peripheral collections computer strategy, still no luck.

  Can anyone shed some light on this for me?

  Thank you

  Hello

  Your question is beyond the scope of this community.

  I suggest that repost you in the TechNet Forums:

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/SystemCenter/en-us/home?category=ConfigurationManager

  "Forums SCCM".

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home?category=systemcenter2012configurationmanager

  See you soon.

• Service Pack compliance - SQL - SCOM

  We have:

  SCOM R2 2012

  SQL MP is up to date

  The question:

  We rely on the compliance of Service Pack within the SQL MP in order to know when the SQL servers fall in non-compliance.  He worked up to 1.5 months ago.  It worked so well, that it has become a tool for our team of SQL.

  We have realized that it stopped working when the SQL team members out of non-compliant servers where we have not received any notification.

  There is little documentation about this tool.

  (1) how do SCOM servers communicate with MS on knowledge when check compliance?  My hunch is that something has changed in the Internet network access.

  (2) is just use MS Updates?

  Any help will be greatly appreciated.

  Thank you!!!

  Hello

  Your question is beyond the scope of this community.

  Please repost your question in the SQL Server TechNet Forums.

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/SQLServer/en-us/home?category=SQLServer

  Or here:

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/SystemCenter/en-us/home?category=systemcenteroperationsmanager

  See you soon.

• 2012 Foundation Server license compliance

  The server has not completed the compliance audit of the licenses. If the server is joined to a domain, make sure that the server can connect to a domain controller. If the license compliant check cannot be performed, the server will automatically stop in 0 days

  I started to get this two small server running Server 2012 Foundation R2, they work well for almost a year into two separate companies. All of the sudden they both started to get this error. The server are Fujitsu, both running the OEM of ROK Fujitsu version are authorized and registered with microsoft. They work together in a 'working group' envioment and both have 9/10 users (Foundation supports 15 users) that I've seen so much after that, but neither gives an answer before stright as to what is the problem and how to fix it? a moment to give a shared other printer installed DNS, I checked both and both work very well. The two server is the only server on the network and is configured as a tourist server but are not used as such users share only 1 or 2 folders and print nothing else is used. Any pointer appsiated.

  Hello

  Post your question in the TechNet Server Forums, as your question kindly is beyond the scope of these Forums.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/WindowsServer/en-us/home?category=WindowsServer

  See you soon.

• The server has not completed the compliance audit of the licenses. If the server is joined to a domain, make sure that the server can connect to a domain controller.

  Hi all

  Can I confirm with expert from Microsoft, it's windows foundation server 2012 may not be the first domain controller (which means that the first AD in the forest)? It must be attached to the root of the forest as a domain controller. If I'm promoting it to be first DC in new forest, he invites you to "the server has not completed the compliance audit of the licenses. If the server is joined to a domain, make sure that the server can connect to a domain controller. If the license compliant check cannot be completed, the server will automatically close in 9 days...

  Thank you & best regards
  Andy

  Hi Andy,.

  Your question of Windows is more complex than what is generally answered in the Microsoft Answers forums. It is better suited for the IT Pro TechNet public. Please post your question in the TechNet Windows Server Forums:
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en/category/WindowsServer

  Hope the helps of information.

• PCI Compliance Server 2012 IIS 6.2

  I have a client that is running Server 2012 with IIS 6.2 and so far I've supported all the questions except two to make them compatible PCI.

  Here are the two imminent failures.

  Server is sensitive to the BEAST attack 443/tcp
  STATE OF PCI COMPLIANCE
  PCI severity: MEDIUM
  IN CASE OF FAILURE
  DETAILS OF THE VULNERABILITY
  CVSSv2 Base Score: 4.3 (AV:N / AC:M / to the: N / reports / i: s/o: N)
  Gravity: potential
  Category: Browser Exploit against SSL TLS
  CVE ID: CVE 2011-3389
  Bugtraq ID: 49388 49778
  OSVDB: 74829
  References Microsoft: MS12-006
  References of providers: CERT: TA12-010 has CERT - VN:VU #864643 HP: HPSBMU02900
  UBUNTU:USN - 1263-1 SECTRACK:1026103 SECTRACK:1025997
  SECTRACK:1029190 APPLICATION: 49778 SUBMISSION: 49388 REDHAT:RHSA - 2012:0006
  REDHAT:RHSA - 2011:1384 MS: MS12 - 006-201406-32 GENTOO:GLSA

  ------------------------------------------------------

  osCommerce allows cross-site scripting 443/tcp
  STATE OF PCI COMPLIANCE
  PCI severity: MEDIUM
  FAILURE of the XSS/SQL/SSL vulnerabilities are not compatible PCI
  DETAILS OF THE VULNERABILITY
  CVSSv2 Base Score: 4.3 (AV:N / AC:M / to the: N / c: n / I: P / A:N)
  Severity: concern
  Category: Cross site scripting
  CVE ID: CVE-2003-1219
  Bugtraq ID: 9238
  OSVDB: -.
  Microsoft references: -.
  References of providers: QUOTE: 9238
  Details: Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the function tep_href_link in
  for osCommerce before 2.2 - MS3 html_output.php allows remote

  Hello

  Question about Windows Server 2012 are best addressed in the TechNet forums. Ask your questions here: https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/home

• How can I make sense of compliance SCCM reports?

  Hello

  I've created several update lists in SCCM. I have planned deployments and waited patiently as they occur. Now, when I jump into SCCM reporting to see how consistent my workstations are against these lists, I'm surprised by the<20%>

  Drilling down to individual computers in this list, I can see that SCCM reports compliance based on all THE updates that are available for these workstations, not the list updated I asked a compliance report for. Things like KB2545698, which is the size of the police and of irregularities in Internet Explorer 9 vs IE8?  I have not even approved or deployed that day and did not want to follow the compliance against it?

  In short, how to get the report of "Overall compliance" in SCCM for the display of results for the update of the list selected when generating the report and no compliance report on every possible update these workstations could potentially install if I approved and deployed (as this information is ZERO make them for me).

  Thank you

  Max

  How does this relate to the features of Windows Update?

  Tip: This is a forum for specific consumers. Try to post in the forums for it professionals in place => http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/category/w7itpro, windowsvistaitpro, windowsxpitpro /

  On the other hand, you can find the Windows Server support in these forums: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/category/windowsserver

  Specific Windows Server security sub-forum: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/winserversecurity/threads

• HIPAA compliance software

  I'm looking for a program to use that will be in HIPAA compliance when sending protected electronic health information. Any suggestions?

  Thank you!

  Kristin

  Why do you want to ask in a forum of Microsoft Windows?

  Let me Google that for you

  You might also be interested in
  http://www.oregonhipaaforum.org/
  http://www.emrandhipaa.com/