Panoramas from Lightroom 6 eventually small

Similar Questions

• Editing photos from Lightroom CC CC of items in layers

  I have a question or forgot with pictures of stratification from lightroom to items CC.  I've done this before and have not had a problem.  The background layer is tiny on the layer and I can't fill the layer with the complete picture.  The other layers are enormous.  What I am doing wrong?

  A possible answer-

  The dimensions in pixels are different for each image.

  'Document' that Photoshop creates should take the size of the bigger picture. The small images will fill only part of the area of the background of the document new box appears therefore as image on a transparent layer.

  You should not use "Transform" or similar to resize the layers.

  

• Colors do not match from Lightroom (checked ICC, cab version and color settings)

  Greetings,

  I have a picture of the water in the rocks in Lightroom CC 2015. Do you have all my settings and it looks the way I want it. He sent to Photoshop CC 2015 and I get this strange halo neon-aqua in the water.

  The image has a DNG from a Panorama in Lightroom, so I tried the following:

  1. check that the treatment of color Aqua/Blue in Lightroom. Restore all files source panorama 0 and rebuilt. Same question.

  2. export file looking for good Lightroom as TIFF, then open it directly from Lightroom. Same question.

  3. open the TIFF file in other applications (e.g., Pixelmator, Raw Therapee). Image looks exactly as it does in Lightroom, so question should be in Photoshop.

  4. change the settings in the color settings in Photoshop. Tried of perceptual and Relative. Have all the options under "Color management policies" as "Preserve" and all options are checked. All combinations led to the same question.

  5 enabled setting in Camera Raw by bridge and resynched setting for the CC apps. Same question.

  6a changed to write the settings Lightroom develop in format JPG, TIFF, PSD files (I always checked even when XMP). Same question.

  7. calibrate the monitor with X - Rite ColorMunki Photo. Same question.

  8 calibrate the monitor with a gain of X-Rite ColorMunki Photo, but this time with the ICC v2 profile. Same question.

  9. turned on GPU (MacBook Pro retina end 2013). Same question.

  10. tried to re-assiging and profile ProPhoto RGB conversion. Same question.

  11. I usually export to Photoshop as 16 bit, ZIP, 300 dpi, ProPhoto RGB TIFF. Tried to export to Photoshop as PSD. Same question.

  12 tried exporting as sRGB and AdobeRGB. Who worked in the sense that the halos of aqua has disappeared, but the image is duller than in Lightroom (although a so slightly).

  In view of the fact that the image is displayed as expected in all applications, but Photoshop (well, Illustrator as well, but it converts the subtle colors of the water in 8-bit, so I'm not sure that the problem is the same), I suspect I'm missing something in Photoshop. In addition, it seems to only affect how Photoshop interprets the images with ProPhoto RGB profiles. I don't remember having this problem with previous versions.

  All the foregoing is CC versions and is up to date. ACR is 9.2.

  Steps 1 through 9 were the ideas that I found elsewhere in the forums, but I'm out of ideas.

  A reflection as to how I can continue to use ProPhoto RGB, given that my entire workflow is based on that?

  Thank you very much

  Paul

  Screenshots would help, but from what you describe this must be your monitor profile. A problem with the profile itself, or an application is not loading the correct profile.

  It does not matter what color space you export from Lightroom. These applications are the two color managed and will display the file correctly regardless of the color space. They must be synchronized (the exception is the threshold effect that can happen from Adobe RGB to sRGB, but you won't see that on a range wide-screen.) Any cutting of ProPhoto was moot because you don't see, in any case, on any monitor).

  So when you say you see a difference between a file exported as ProPhoto and exported as Adobe RGB or sRGB, it's a smoking gun. Something wrong here, and the main suspect is still the monitor profile.

  The two find themselves in the same monitor profile, but the source profiles are different. In Lightroom, it is linear (gamma 1.0) ProPhoto, in Photoshop gamma 1.8 ProPhoto, Adobe RGB or sRGB. Conversions are so different. This is why a bad profile may appear differently in different scenarios.

  Basic troubleshooting is to replace the monitor with a known good profile. That would be the sRGB or Adobe RGB, depending on whether your monitor is a standard or wide range. Then see if there is still a difference. Be sure to restart both applications when done - they load the profile screen on startup.

  

• My sRGB JPEGs from Lightroom different online

  I'm having a bit of a problem with my sRGB JPEG files from lightroom,

  Initially, the JPEGs looked different to Lightroom everywhere (Windows etc. Photo Viewer), but when I imported them back into Lightroom, they looked the same as the published RAWs.

  I solved with a little research by removing my profiles of color monitors, now my sRGB JPEGS look identical in Photo Viewer Windows as the RAWs edited in Lightroom.

  However, as soon as I download these JPEG files online, they are different again!

  See the examples:

  

  If you look at the trees to the right of the image on the image uploaded on Facebook you can see that they are quite a bit darker than on the windows photo viewer. It becomes much more obvious if you zoom in. How can occur when it is the exact same sRGB JPEG?

  Thanks for any help!

  Thank you both for your responses. I solved the problem, but I don't really know how. All I did was unplug my monitor and plug it into a small TV instead, the images seemed identical to television in IE and Chrome. I then plugged my monitor into and what you know, images look identical through IE and Chrome now? !!!

  All I can think is that my profile of monitor settings were somewhat damaged or messed up, and chrome could not map the profile properly on my monitor. When I plugged the TV it must have refreshed the monitor profile and then 're-installed' when I reconnected my original monitor

  Very strange...

• Why can't I create a good performance of Acrobat to print from Lightroom in Win 7?

  I have two computers: an older XP laptop computer with many applications and an old Win7 dedicated workstation for 6 months for a photography work.  Everyone has Acrobat 10.1.0 and Lightroom installed 3.4.1.

  Sometimes I print proof of batches of photos using Lightroom Print, print to Adobe PDF.

  On XP, I have never had trouble printing an Acrobat PDF from Lightroom.

  On Win7, I NEVER was able to print a good PDF Acrobat from Lightroom.  A PDF file is produced that is readable and contains all the text expected properly prepared in the planned grid (names, page numbers), but it contains only a fraction of the photos, anywhere between zero and a significant percentage.  Each photo that appears is actually complete and not partial.  If I re - run the print job, sometimes different photos materialize than last time. The number of photos in the batch seems to make no difference to the result - also very small batches have the problem.

  Something more - it takes that long in Lightroom to print format PDF as you would expect, in other words, it seems to be made each appropriate photo.

  I'm stumped on how to solve this problem.  I reinstalled Acrobat and Lightroom, and during the last 6 months since I have this machine, I was setup one-time release of these two products, any combination of which worked for me.

  Any tips on what I can do about it?

  This was identified as a problem in Acrobat and in the system for a fix.

  Thanks to cross barriers and reports.

• Images from Lightroom do not look the same when opened in PSCS5

  Hello

  I use LR 3 and PS CS5, but an annoying problem that I don't know how to fix. Basically, when I look at a picture in the window inside LR 3, obviously true insofar the contrast and saturation and hue... when I select Edit in Photoshop CS5, the file opens in the PS, but the contrast and saturation and the same hue are a little off. Why?

  Thank you

  Juan

  Juan, note that in Lightroom develop didn't use all the raw data available at a time to give you an overview. She does as otherwise, the program would be unusably slow. Each movement of a slider should give rise to a complete rerendering of the data at full resolution and then reduce the image resolution of the screen. Even on very fast machines out there that lasts about one second that would make all glacial especially on normal computers. So in a zoomed view outside, it takes just a subset of the raw data at lower resolution and uses for rendering. This can subtly affect the saturation in cases where there are a lot of specific details of the colors because there are no average before reaching the lower res image. When you zoom to 1:1, Lightroom simply makes only the small subset of the image you see in your window. Because it is a small subset, it is still once very fast, but is now done at full resolution. To develop, you can only 1:1 see Lightroom apply the noise reduction and levels of sharpening that can also affect the saturation similar to zoom out. Certainly, this will remain a problem until we are a few generations further down the curve of Moore. However, at this time there, the resolution of the cameras will have increased by the same amount as the rest of the problem.

  Now consider what happens when you go to Photoshop. Lightroom (or ACR when you use "Edit in Photoshop") reproduces the image of the raw usually a TIFF 16 bit prophotoRGB. It is then opened in Photoshop. Photoshop doesn't know how to deal with RAW files. He needs a fully rendered RGB image provided by ACR or Lightroom. Now, since you have a fully rendered image, downward revision is very easy. However, you have more freedom to reinterpret raw data. The model used in Photoshop is very different from Lightroom and so different restrictions apply.

  In the Lightroom library views, a prerendered jpeg is used for the display. This means that, in library view, the image is reduced to a fully rendered image and should show a desaturation with respect to develop when you have a lot of specific color details. Note that neither Lightroom overview of the library and scaled down preview Photoshop are actually accurate. The two scale in a corrected gamma space, but for display only. To complicate this, Lightroom evolves down using a different algorithm than Photoshop (which uses several mechanisms based on the zoom level - i.e. If it is divisible by two).  It is simply impossible to precisely display a picture in high resolution on a computer screen very low resolution. Always deal with scaling, for which there is no more correct approach. They have questions (stupid method of Photoshop has certainly).

  Finally, a lot of people who see subtle (or even extreme) differences between Photoshop and Lightroom do have a problem with their monitor profile. Make sure calibrate you re - your monitor, and when you do, make sure that the calibration software generates a v2 profile (most profiling software have this option in advanced settings). Lightroom treats LUT v4 unlike Photoshop monitor profile. This difference will be left in a matrix of v2 profile.

• Photos sent by e-mail is not clear from Lightroom

  When I sent a photo from Lightroom by e-mail.

  The picture is not clear when I open

  Why?

  Did you take care to set the size of the image by e-mail?

  

• Color profile question from lightroom to PSE 12.

  After changing for Windows 10 I find that the color profile is deleted when opening a file from Lightroom 6 to 12 of PSE.  I also get an error message when you try to load a 12 for 8.5 RAW update.  The error reads U44M1I210.  If anyone can help with the problem.

  Ok. What is the setting in Lightroom under preferences > external editing > color space? Here you have the choice between sRGB, Adobe RGB and ProPhoto. The default is ProPhoto, and unless you have changed, it is how it opens in the external editor (in your case, PES).

  If you view while in an another viewer of photos without color management, color will be away (dark and desaturated).

  Now, there may be color settings of the specific items that can strip or convert this profile, so I would still recommend that go. All I can do here is to take the floor for Lightroom and Photoshop.

• Import directly from Lightroom still not possible...

  Hello Adobe,

  why it is unable to import photos directly from Lightroom?

  It is no good workflow open Lightroom, export photos to a new folder and import them manually into Muse-. -.

  I suggest that this post really belongs in the forum lightroom under "request a service"?

  But I'll try to answer anyway.

  Lightroom is a program intended for professionals (who are not the original to be changed when editing image) that is why all the export options are defined as a 2-step... The idea is to make | Export your changes without touching the main image.

  Why it does not = because Adobe has not got around manufacturing it syncs to the library of cc or update web code built-in to make slideshows (the reason for which our company dropped) fixed the just basic UI work on modern windows machines then your options are;

  • Put up with it until Adobe bypasses to fixing the program or
  • Use photoshop instead... My recommendation.

• Keep the dng or CR2 files when switching from Lightroom and Photoshop.

  From Lightroom and Photoshop, how can I keep the dng or CR2 files. Now it changes the psd and when I return to Lightroom it removes options in the section of Calibration of the camera, so that while I have a choice (Adobe Standard/camera faithful), after returning from Photoshop file I have "Embedded." How can I keep the dng or CR2 files

  Adding to the good advice of Alfred - a raw file cannot be registered as the other files.

  Its only use is the basis for the creation of new files, which must be regular files, such as tiff, psd or jpg.

  When you edit a raw file in Lightroom, it does not change the file, the changes are written to the catalog.

  Optionally, save the changes in the form of metadata (xmp) sidecar files, or in the case of DNG in the file itself.

• Images from Lightroom slow opening in Photoshop cc cc

  I just upgraded to the stand-alone versions of 6 cc Lightroom & Photoshop 6 (hoped for an increase in speed and new features). When I want to edit an image in Photoshop from Lightroom, it opens very slowly or I try a couple of times before opening. Any advice on a solution would be appreciated. Thank you.

  The standalone version and the CC version share the same program code. Regarding speed, you won't see any difference. However, the CC version adds new features that the stand-alone version does not.

  Compare your Options: the differences between Lightroom 6 vs CC | ProDesignTools

  As already mentioned of Mohit: Please post your system specs.

• I can't change my photos from lightroom to photoshop

  I'm not able to edit my photos from lightroom to photoshop

  Yes, it is one of the measures mentioned in the link, I posted "Edit in Photoshop" missing order and solves the question several times.

  ~ Assani

• When to go from Lightroom to Photoshop

  Hello

  I searched the forum and not quite found the exact answer, but I confess, I'm new here so sorry if this is old news.

  So, I'm working on my photos in lightroom (do the majority of the edition) and occasionally in Photoshop (fluidity and more nuanced and powerful healing and fading of shit).

  My question is: when if the best time to go from Lightroom to Photoshop?  First option: before making changes to lightroom, go into photoshop and make the changes, then apply changes to lightroom to the new tiff file?  Option two: when any changes in Lightroom are fully completed, then send to Photoshop and edit (realizing that once I go to Photoshop, I'm no longer by changing the RAW file, but now to edit the Photoshop tiff file) Option three: anytime?

  Are there other options I think not?

  Thank you

  Jerm

  I think you do as much editing in Lightroom as possible, and only then you go to Photoshop for editing you need which is not possible in Lightroom.

  Of course, you could go to Photoshop when you want to, but there is little benefit unless you have done as much as you can in Lightroom and still have editing capability that has only Photoshop.

• How to get my files from lightroom on a single computer to lightroom on another.

  This might be a really easy question, but I'm really illiterate when it comes to computers.  I was using a PC and just bought a Mac.  How do I get all my images from lightroom on the old computer to my new computer?  Any info or advice would be greatly appreceiated.

  Thank you

  Stephanie

  Hi Stephanie,

  Please refer to How can I move Lightroom to a new computer? The Lightroom Queen and follow the steps.

  Let us know if you have any questions.

  Kind regards

  Assani

• Problem when I open an image from lightroom to PS CC

  Hello! For some time, I have a lot of noise on my image in PS when I open it from lightroom. I think it is started after an update, but I'm not sure. It is very annoying because I never know if my picture is good or not. In lightroom, all is well. Someone knows what to do? I really need my PS, but I can't use it and I paid for it.  Thank you

  Marie-Josée

  Assess the noise and sharpening must be made to the 1:1 / 100% view - any other point of view will be inaccurate and misleading.

  Therefore, compare reviews of 1:1 in Lightroom with 100% view in Photoshop,

  If the image is still louder in Photoshop, go to Preferences > performance and try to set the Cache level to 4.