Parallel index property

Similar Questions

• manage the z-index property in the chrome browser (was: is there another problem with Chrome?)

  Hello

  I wonder is there another problem with Edge and Chrome.

  I know that something got sorted out but now I have a problem with rectangles (such as the hitboxes) not appearing is not in Chrome.

  Anyone know why this is happening?

  Hi Robyn,

  Looks like a problem with chrome. He is not able to manage the z-index property (although set) in this case. Due to which the user is not able to click on the button that is hidden by another element.

  There is a workaround solution you can do on board animate:

  You simply select the item named "s_cpl_fa_nav_x2" in the Panel edge ' Elements' animate and drag just below the element named "s_cpl_fa_0_guide_page1" and delete the selected item. This will place the first below the latter, with regard to the stacking order of the UI, and so the click event will work.

  I hope this works.

• Gurus: PARALLEL index does NOT work in 11g. Any suggestions

  SQL stmt:

  SELECT / * + PARALLEL (r) * /.

  r.C1, r.c2

  From table1 r

  -> Table 1 has 44 million records.

  -> Explain plan shows FULL TABLE SCAN

  Hello

  You can post the steps that you run on your DB (from sqlplus)?

  It's my DB:

  SQL > show parameter parallel_instance_group;

  VALUE OF TYPE NAME

  ------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------

  parallel_instance_group string ora1

  SQL > show parameter instance_groups;

  VALUE OF TYPE NAME

  ------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------

  instance_groups string

  SQL > explain plan for select / * + parallel (r) * / table1 object_id r;

  He explained.

  SQL > select * from table (dbms_xplan.display ());

  PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Hash value of plan: 963482612

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |        | 61519 |   781K |   283 (1) | 00:00:04 |

  |   1.  TABLE ACCESS FULL | TABLE1. 61519 |   781K |   283 (1) | 00:00:04 |

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Note

  -----

  PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  -dynamic sample used for this survey (level = 2)

  12 selected lines.

  SQL > alter session set parallel_instance_group = ";

  Modified session.

  SQL > explain plan for select / * + parallel (r) * / table1 object_id r;

  He explained.

  SQL > select * from table (dbms_xplan.display ());

  PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Hash value of plan: 1574891232

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |    TQ | IN-OUT | PQ Distrib.

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |          | 61519 |   781K |   283 (1) | 00:00:04 |        |      |            |

  |   1.  COORDINATOR OF PX |          |       |       |            |          |        |      |            |

  |   2.   PX SEND QC (RANDOM). : TQ10000 | 61519 |   781K |   283 (1) | 00:00:04 |  Q1 00 | P-> S | QC (RAND) |

  |   3.    ITERATOR BLOCK PX |          | 61519 |   781K |   283 (1) | 00:00:04 |  Q1 00 | ISSUE |            |

  |   4.     TABLE ACCESS FULL | TABLE1. 61519 |   781K |   283 (1) | 00:00:04 |  Q1 00 | SVCP |            |

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Note

  -----

  -dynamic sample used for this survey (level = 2)

  15 selected lines.

  SQL >

  Kind regards

  Ivica

  Post edited by: Ivica Arsov

• ALTER INDEX with parallel and Nologging

  I want to move some indexes to a different tablespace. For this I use the SQL below:

  XYZ ALTER INDEX REBUILD TABLESPACE TS_INDX01 NOLOGGING PARALLEL 8;

  I use NOLOGGING and PARALLEL thinking it will speed up the process of movement. But now I'm confused because I think that this will change the index property, as in, when we create an index specify us certain parallels and logging properties.

  So I want to understand:

  1. the SQL above to change the properties of the index?

  2. How can I check the existing nologging and parallel properties of an index?

  SQL> create table temp (no integer, name varchar2(100));
  
  Table created.
  
  SQL> create index temp_idx on temp(no);
  
  Index created.
  
  SQL> select degree, logging from user_indexes where index_name = 'TEMP_IDX';
  
  DEGREE                                   LOG
  ---------------------------------------- ---
  1                                        YES
  
  SQL> drop index temp_idx;
  
  Index dropped.
  
  SQL> create index temp_idx on temp(no) nologging parallel 5;
  
  Index created.
  
  SQL> select degree, logging from user_indexes where index_name = 'TEMP_IDX';
  
  DEGREE                                   LOG
  ---------------------------------------- ---
  5                                        NO
  
  SQL> alter index temp_idx parallel 1 logging
    2  ;
  
  Index altered.
  
  SQL> select degree, logging from user_indexes where index_name = 'TEMP_IDX';
  
  DEGREE                                   LOG
  ---------------------------------------- ---
  1                                        YES
  

• Point property Index, performance problems

  I write a script that loops through the index of a document theme objects and for each theme through PageReference objects and different bits of treatment which I won't bore you with the fact. Everything was going great.

  For this part of the script, I already had the code that called a PageReference who fell on a page later than the previous PageReference, but I wanted to handle things differently if the new PageReference, while on a page later, was in fact always in the same paragraph as the previous...

  Find that the page number is pretty easy, find the paragraph is fairly easy, but I assumed that it would be much faster to compare a property that would be specific to each paragraph, rather than compare the Paragraph objects themselves, that is why I took on the Index property. And I found myself with something like this:

  var oInsertionPoint = oPageReference.sourceText;
  var nReferencedPage = Number(oInsertionPoint.parentTextFrames[0].parentPage.name);
  
  var nThisParaIndex = oInsertionPoint.paragraphs[0].index;
  
  if (nReferencedPage > nLastReferencedPage)
  {
      if (nThisParaIndex != nLastParaIndex)
          // processing here
      else
          // alternative processing here
         
      nLastReferencedPage = nReferencedPage;
  }
  
  nLastParaIndex = nThisParaIndex;
  
  

  And suddenly the script, which was already very well, ran like a dog with three legs with molasses. Switching on profiling in the ExtendScript Toolkit options told me that more than 50% of the processing time of the script is taken on this one declaration "var nThisParaIndex = oInsertionPoint.paragraphs [0] .index; -a not unreasonable calculation counts as insertion doubled at the time the script took to run. I tried to divide in two, first grasp the object of paragraphs [0] and then by recording its Index value, but it didn't speed things up, he comes to confirm that it was the reference to the Index property, not the reference to the Paragraph itself object that took all the time.

  I tried to change the references as well as tests from the values of the index in paragraph objects themselves and change the problematic line to ' var oThisPara = oInsertionPoint.paragraphs [0]; "was certainly faster, but then the comparison between the 'this' and 'last' Paragraph objects has been much slower that comparing the two numeric values, so it was not really an improvement.

  Can anyone offer a solution to this problem? Be solved what takes so long to access the Index property and to find a way to deal with this issue? Or by offering an alternative and less slow property paragraph that I could check? Or even a completely different approach that would allow me to check the same thing?

  Edit: I should add that it's CS5.5.

  Perhaps it is true up to a number of calls and process, things are going relatively smoothly, and that, when some critical point is reached, things begin to fall apart. This would explain why divide the story into separate stories gave it this speed boost: the critical point is never reached.

  It could also explain why the addition of this statement "var nThisParaIndex = oInsertionPoint.paragraphs [0] .index;" in your script well work reduced to a crawl: before adding this statement, the critical point has not reached; the statement added added enough calls to overthrow the script of the critical point. I don't know if this is true, but it seems consistent with your comments.

  For the sake of interest, you might try the following approach to your publication of a floor. The idea is this: you create an array of indices of paragraph, presenting itself as for example [0, 100, 150, 500,...]. It captures the first paragraph of the story index is 0, clause 2 index is 100, the third, 150, etc. This could be a great picture.

  To determine if two cross references are in the same paragraph, you look at the position of the sourceText.index of these two paragraphs. This script illustrates:

  // Create an array of indexes of the paragraphs in myStory
  // You would do this just once.
  
  var paragraphIndexes = myStory.paragraphs.everyItem().index;
  var last = paragraphIndexes.length-1;
  
  // Given two pageReference objects xRef1 and xRef2, determine the rank of each.
  // If the ranks are the same, the pageReference objects are in the same paragraph.
  
  if (getRank (xRef1.sourceText.index) === getRank (xRef2.sourceText.index)) {
    // xRef1 and xRef2 are in the same paragraph
  }
  
  function getRank (index) {
    var n = last;
    while (n >= 0 && index < paragraphIndexes[n]) {
      n--;
    }
    return n;
  }
  

  In this approach, you will access model object InDesign times less than in your script. You can access it whenever the script determines the index of a pageReference sourceText, but it only once for each comparison.

  Peter

• DAC - index in parallel

  How DAC indexes run in parallel?
  
  We are on OBI Apps - 7.9.5.

  Navigate to the physical configuration of the Sources of data - parallel Index creation - set a value

  If you want parallel index that will be created at the same table, select the shadow checkbox table index.

  If the script must be changed to include PARALLEL then it can be very well inside the D:\OracleBI\DAC\CustomSQLs

  file customsql.Xml... change the syntax of create index would include the parallelism.

  HTH

• At all indexes on tables of the same value in the structure of the event

  Hello

  I have a panel with the four bays and I use a structure of the event.

  Now, I want that change of the index of array_1 also affects the index of 3 other tables at the same index.

  But there is only a property "value Exchange" and no property 'index-change' in the properties of the table.

  So I read the 'index' property and write in the other table.

  But: It seems as if I have to do so within the period of waiting-section of the structure of the event.

  Is there another way to do this?

  Thanks for help

  You can use the mouse event on each table to detec the event (of course, that will attract not only a change of index, but I don't think you care too) and then use the 'values of the indices' property on all the table to set.

  See annex VI (LV2012), hope this helps

• problem with index on a list of variants

  Hi, im working with a variant property list and index property int for the passage of the current 5 days and back temperature seems to work, but it has some problems, first of all, instead of the current temperature, I got 0 and then when I get to the day 4 me sends to the current day, and when I am right now (jsonweather.temp in the list) I spend twice for him , I increase the index on the shot upwards and taper sliding down like that

  Page {
  
  property variant list
  property int index: 0
  
  list: [ jsonweather.temp,
          jsonweather.tempMax1,
          jsonweather.tempMax2,
          jsonweather.tempMax3,
          jsonweather.tempMax4,
          jsonweather.tempMax5 ]
  
  function setIndex(_index){
          index = _index
      }
  function temperatureChanges(index){
          if(_WeatherNow.useFarenheit == true){
              weatherDataTemperature.text = Math.round((list[index])*1.8+32);
         } else{
                weatherDataTemperature.text = Math.round(list[index]);
              }
      }
  
  Container {
          id:swipeContainer
  
          property int swipeThreshold: 100
          property double swipeStartPosX: -1
          property double swipeStartPosY: -1
          property double swipeLastKnownPosX: -1
          property double swipeLastKnownPosY: -1
          property bool swipeStart: false
          property bool swipeMove: false
  
  attachedObjects: [
  PositionSource {
              id: positionSource
              //! Desired interval between updates in milliseconds
              updateInterval: 10000
              //! When position changed, update the location strings
              onPositionChanged: {
                  currentCoord = positionSource.position.coordinate;
                  latitude = Math.round(currentCoord.latitude*1000)/1000;
                  longitude = Math.round(currentCoord.longitude*1000)/1000;
                  console.debug("Latitude: " + latitude, "Longitude: " + longitude);
                  positionSource.stop();
                  // start loading weather data for location
                  jsonweather.getWeatherdata(latitude, longitude);
                  jsonweather.onGetReply(loading.stop())
              }
          },
          ExternalIP {
              id : jsonweather
              onNameChanged: {
                  weatherDataCity.text = name;
              }
              onDescriptionChanged: {
                  weatherDataCondition.text = list2[index2];
              }
              onHumidityChanged: {
  
              }
              onTempChanged: {
              if(_WeatherNow.useFarenheit == true){
              weatherDataTemperature.text = Math.round((list[index])*1.8+32);
              } else{
              weatherDataTemperature.text = Math.round(list[index]);
              }
  }
          ]
          function processSwipe() {
              var horz = swipeContainer.swipeLastKnownPosX - swipeContainer.swipeStartPosX;
              var vert = swipeContainer.swipeLastKnownPosY - swipeContainer.swipeStartPosY;
  
              if (Math.abs(vert) > swipeThreshold) {
                  if (vert > 0) {
  
                      if(index > 0) temperatureChanges(index--)
                      else index = list.length - 1
  
                  }
                  else if (vert < 0) {
                      //swipe up
                      if (index < list.length - 1) temperatureChanges(index++)
                      else index = 0
              }
  }
              if (Math.abs(horz) > Math.abs(vert)) {
              // Moving horizontally: refresh information
              if (Math.abs(horz) > swipeThreshold) {
                  if (horz < 0) {
  
                           loading.start()
                           positionSource.start()
                           temperatureChanges(index)
  
                  } else if (horz > 0) {
                      temperatureChanges(index)
                  }
  
  }
          }
          }
          onTouch: {
              if (event.isDown()) {
                  swipeContainer.swipeStartPosX = event.windowX;
                  swipeContainer.swipeStartPosY = event.windowY;
                  swipeContainer.swipeStart = true;
              } else if (event.isMove() && swipeStart) {
                  swipeContainer.swipeMove = true;
                  swipeContainer.swipeLastKnownPosX = event.windowX;
                  swipeContainer.swipeLastKnownPosY = event.windowY;
              } else if ((event.isUp() || event.isCancel()) && swipeContainer.swipeMove) {
                  swipeContainer.swipeStart = false;
                  swipeContainer.swipeMove = false;
                  processSwipe();
              }
          }
  onCreationCompleted: {setIndex(0)}
  }
  

  This code seems very strange to me...

  if(index > 0) temperatureChanges(index--)
  else index = list.length - 1
  

  If it should not change anything...

  if(index > 0) index--
  else index = list.length - 1
  temperatureChanges(index)
  

  Ditto for increase the index in the code a little later, the.

  I do not say that it is something to do with your problem, that there should be further analysis, but this code seemed to me odd right now.

• in a PivotTable, the Director of the Forum can tell the index of the current instance of the line?

  Script dependencies and "recalculate()".

  I am the example here and use it to make a dynamic array. The button now work as my Add/Delete a button line + /.

  From the guide, I can use the instance manager and add or remove any instance of line. Now, I want to know what line I'm publishing now, so that when there is data in the other lines that the first line, it appears an alert reminding me to complete the first line beforehand.

  

  Code instance manager that works in my local:

  var oTargetSubform = addButton.parent.repeatingTable.repeatingRow; Line subform or a table, the controls are intended to manipulate.

  oManager var = oTargetSubform.instanceManager; Download the instance Manager.

  while I suppose that property I should want to talk is oManager.index, it always returns 0, but I can't find the definition of 'index' in Designer 11: Adobe LiveCycle ES4 * instanceManager

  Hello

  to be able to know what line you are currently in when you change a field in any event you can call the index property of the parent row of the field... In this case, you can use the property parent to access the line where the field is inside of...

  For example: this.parent.index-> (1) parent means that the field is directly in the line considered a cell

  This.parent.parent.index-> (2) parents means that the field is in a subform in the line

  I hope this will help you!

• How much will be / * + PARALLEL * / use?

  Hello

  I've always used / * + PARALLEL (tablename, degree) * / but I recently saw a query using just / * + PARALLEL * /.

  How much will be / * + PARALLEL * /. use? the degree with which the table is created? If Yes, what happens if the table is created without any parallelism.

  I tried to search the Internet but no conclusive answer, so approaching again the expert forum is not found.

  I've always used / * + PARALLEL (tablename, degree) * / but I recently saw a query using just / * + PARALLEL * /.

  How much will be / * + PARALLEL * /. use? the degree with which the table is created? If Yes, what happens if the table is created without any parallelism.

  I tried to search the Internet but no conclusive answer, so approaching again the expert forum is not found.

  Interesting - I searched using "parallel index of oracle 11 g" and this was the FIRST link

  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E11882_01/server.112/e25523/parallel002.htm

  Then I searched the page for "parallel" and find section 19.1.2.7 tips for parallel execution which was State

  You can specify the parallelism at the level of the object or statement. If you do not explicitly specify an object in the indicator, then parallelism occurs at the level of instruction.

  Then, this article explains the difference between the EDUCATIONAL level and OBJECT level parallelism and includes a code example.

  And article 3 of the code example shows this:

  3 run the following SELECT statement:

  SELECT / * + PARALLEL (4) * / hr_emp.last_name, d.department_name
  Hr_emp, departments d employees
  WHERE the hr_emp.department_id = d.department_id;
  Because there is no schema object specified in the PARALLEL indication, the scope of the indicator is education, not an object. This statement requires the request of employees and departments to run with a degree of parallelism to 4, tables substituting defined on tables parallelism setting.

  All this took less than 5 minutes and EXACTLY answer your question!

  The documentation is your friend.

  I suggest that a break of Oracle and research of tutorials on the internet about how to search the Internet. Until you learn how to search effectively on the internet, you will continue to have problems, find answers.

• Indexing and who should do it

  I work for a company that has a fairly large data warehouse Oracle that we use to store the SAP data dissemination (about 500 M of lines for some tables). Tables are not indexed and if I try to reach them on the query takes hours to complete. If the DBA needs to be proactive and create these indexes in order to reduce the load on the database?

  The team wants to load our 40 hours for 3 indices Department ADMINISTRATOR has already provided a script for. I'm naïve or y at - it something crazy to need 40 hours to implement 3 clues? I should mention that these tables is related to SAP and should be indexed to joined already IMO.

  I'm just trying to understand if I'm missing something.

  Thank you

  Creation of parallel indexing can reduce your time to create, but you must "alter index noparallel xyz" after its creation if you want really not parallel to this topic.

  Another impact on the creation of index how long does is how fast your hardware (processors, processor speed, speed of SAN etc.), but also what else is no running on the database in time using server resources.

  On an AIX Power 7-3 processor (quad core) production server it took me about 15 minutes to create an index on a table of 600 million lines running at the same time 8.

  On an AIX Power 5-4 Intel (quadruple-heart) test server it took about twice as long.  The SAN on production was super fast as well which had impact on how long it took.

  There are other factors that will affect the creation time.

  Specifically that I seriously doubt they can justify bill you for 40 hours.  It is unlikely that someone will run a script and then watching the screen for the next 40 hours waiting for the index to create... unless they are a bunch of clowns.  More than likely they run the script, go and do other things and periodically check to see if she has completed.

  Your IT team is having a laugh.  It should be fun to ask them to justify and to break the 40 hours.  minute to copy the script on the server, 30 seconds to go, 30 seconds to run the script.  39hrs, of 58 minutes watching the screen ready to create index at the end... Hmm... sounds fishy to me.

• How to create faster index in the table of 500 GB

  Dear Experts,

  I have to create 20 index on table data-ware house. This table is of size 500 GB.

  freshen up this weekly chart using the external table.

  creating 20 indexes on this table consumes a lot of time.

  I have 40 GB of ram on 2012 box windows with 8 processors.

  I installed 11 GR 2.

  I have 4 drives C D E F

  for AN index, it takes 4 hours

  
  

  I added enough space to the tablespace

  I put the tablespace in a drive D:\
  

  
  

  I'm under control to create indexes below

  create index  X_3_INVEN_ITEM_ID_IDX  on   X_3_PV_TD_2 (INVENTORY_ITEM_ID)  parallel 32 nologging;
  
  

  output long ops

  SID, SERIAL # CONTEXT SOFAR TOTALWORK LESS TARGET % _COMPLETE TIME_REMAINING

  ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- --------------

  108 10 0 3758 140973 Rowid Scan AD range. X_3_PV_TD_2                                    2.67            256

  173 23 0 5279 141470 Rowid Scan AD range. X_3_PV_TD_2                                    3.73            258

  114 6 0 10092 141786 Rowid Scan AD range. X_3_PV_TD_2                                    7.12            261

  99         59          0      46283     325908 Sort Output                                                                                                                     14.2          15207

  68        214          0      46763     323623 Sort Output                                                                                                                    14.45          14973

  35         93          0      47531     318364 Sort Output                                                                                                                    14.93          14570

  164         70          0      45058     288506 Sort Output                                                                                                                    15.62          12886

  227         31          0      44130     282285 Sort Output                                                                                                                    15.63          13011

  13          3          0      51890     309515 Sort Output                                                                                                                    16.76          12874

  222 67 0 28837 141380 Rowid Scan AD range. X_3_PV_TD_2                                    20.4            343

  73 37 0 32472 141488 Rowid Scan AD range. X_3_PV_TD_2 22.95 212

  47 8 0 34332 141154 Rowid Scan AD range. X_3_PV_TD_2 24,32 202

  176 20 0 35197 141161 Rowid Scan AD range. X_3_PV_TD_2 24.93 205

  19 7 0 35239 141325 Rowid Scan AD range. X_3_PV_TD_2 24.93 205

  80 4 0 40399 141611 Rowid Scan AD range. X_3_PV_TD_2 28,53 193

  144 20 0 44960 141481 Rowid Scan AD range. X_3_PV_TD_2 31,78 182

  233 101 0 74086 169228 Rowid Scan AD range. X_3_PV_TD_2 43,78 176

  128 165 0 78765 141436 Rowid Scan AD range. X_3_PV_TD_2 55.69 173

  235 1 0 41199796 70035728 table Scan AD. X_3_PV_TD_2 58,83 19804

  199 6 0 52748651 70035728 table Scan AD. X_3_PV_TD_2 75,32-9709

  44 2 0 53686039 70035728 table Scan AD. X_3_PV_TD_2 76,66 9022

  204 26 0 119969 141464 Rowid Scan AD range. X_3_PV_TD_2                                   84.81             40

  202 48 0 138880 162276 Rowid Scan AD range. X_3_PV_TD_2                                   85.58             43

  17 33 0 126506 141778 Rowid Scan AD range. X_3_PV_TD_2                                   89.23             28

  48 7 0 137772 141360 Rowid Scan AD range. X_3_PV_TD_2                                   97.46             15

  Temp tablespace

  
  

  USED_MB USED TOT_MB % NOM_TABLESPACE

  ------------------------------ ---------- ---------- ----------
TEMP 11533 286719 4.02

  temporary tables

  OWNER SEGMENT_NAME SEGMENT_TY TABLESPACE_NAME EXTENTS BYTES_
---------- ------------------------------ ---------- -------------------- ---------- ---------------
AD 156.1601650 TEMPORARY USERS 96 209,715,200

  Question:

  How to fix this?

  (a) run several parallel create sqlplus statement index different sessions

  (b) create a tablespace to put data files in different hard drives like D: E: F: C:

  (c) create the separate tablespace for each hard drive and map it to a single disk IO benefit

  (d) I have 8 processors but parallel 32 is not speed

  (e) how these clues I can run in parallel. Is it OK to run 20 parallel index 32 sqlplus sessions

  All that I have to create 20 index on the table of 500 GB

  target memory = 30GB

  index of names to create 20, each index is 10 GB

  his is of 80 hours (4 hours per index)

  This machine is waiting, I just used all the resources of the machine to accelerate.

  Thanks for reading this

  Thanks for the help in advance

  I was talking about your end of issue speed up construction of index, where I proposed

  orclz >

  orclz > alter session set workarea_size_policy = manual;

  Modified session.

  orclz > alter session set sort_area_size = 2147483647;

  Modified session.

  orclz > create index

  Post edited by: JohnWatson

  Sorry, I misread it: this question was not from you. My apologies. My solution should work for you, however: give yourself a big PGA, manually. Automatic PGA management using not will never give you enough.

• Statement of parallel Queueing

  I know that statement parallel queues is enabled when you use automatic degree of parallelism. I am trying to identify if it is possible to use parallel statement queues without using auto DOP. My current environment does not use auto DOP and I was looking to use queues to troubleshoot a performance gap problem that I see. I will present a request for support as well, but I wanted to see if anyone had experience with this or if it was still possible. Thanks for your time.

  According to the documentation Oracle Advanced features like automatic DOP, statement queuing parallel execution and parallel in-memory execution depends on the value of the PARALLEL_DEGREE_POLICY parameter. Statement queuing is available only if the parameter is set to AUTOMATIC.

  Here is the document [url http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e25523/parallel002.htm#CIHEFJGC].

  As automatic DOP itself depends on many other factors to work (such as the degree of DEFAULT value defined for objects), it is theoretically possible to use queuing and always explicitly specify DOP for the majority of the objects through two parallel degree property notes.

  It will be useful.

• Property is renamed to the opening

  Hello

  I have a weird problem. I use "Advanced Lightning" and the expression following the Direction (called french "axe") property. Everything works fine, so I save and close the project.

  When I open it, the property of "Axe" seems to have been renamed to "Control popup" and so mess up all of my expressions. When I click on the layer and the effect, it goes back on behalf of the normal, but I have to re-enable the expression. I have a LOT of expressions, so is not the solution!

  Anyone have any ideas?

  Thank you very much

  Fred

  IM on Windows 7 64-bit after effects CC in french

  This is a limitation in all these controls. You must use the index property, i.e. to put a single number without quotes in there.

  Mylenium

• z-index option

  I don't see an option to determine what item is visually on top another. Would it not possible to integrate a z-index property in the options?

  Thank you for all the work you do on this tool! I think it is very useful!

  Hi SLBohrman,

  Z Index is available in reflow Preview 2 version (in the pane advanced, where the position is set to relative, absolute or fixed.

  See you soon,.

  Remy sisi,

  Developer of reflow