Gurus: PARALLEL index does NOT work in 11g. Any suggestions

Similar Questions

• 'Windows 7 search' does not & "indexing does not work" (on libraries)

  'Windows 7 search' does not & "indexing does not work" (on the libraries).

  How can I correct (get indexing and searching for work) research one of the features of pride & joy MS on Librearies?

  The Indexing Options Control Panel indicates "Indexing does not work" & the library places panel shows Unresponsive.

  The service started Windows search and then stopped.

  Look forward to any suggestions

  Ed.

  Hello EdJarvis,

  Thanks for the return of the response.  Below is a link with the same problem reported.  You did some of the steps listed to try, but there are others listed.

  Windows Search service does not (Windows 7)

  http://answers.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/Forum/Windows_7-performance/Windows-Search-service-is-not-running-window-7/3d7858e1-c3d3-4149-9EC1-640f319c0137

  Please let us know status.

• Why B * TREE index does not work when ask explicit type conversion.

  What is the job of back-end of B * column indexed with numeric type data when to perform explicit Conversion in the WHERE clause of number of Char.

  Basically my question is why index does not work when applying both sides TO_CHAR conversion in where clause?

  Let's say we have a table with 1 million rows

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Create Table T (collar number);

  -The unique index on the column.

  CREATE A UNIQUE IDX_T ON T (CSA COL) INDEX.

  -Insert the statement on the table with million lines

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Begin

  For I In 1.1000000 loop

  Insert Into Values T (I);

  End loop;

  COMMIT;

  End;

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  We have different situations using

  explain plan for select col from t where col =?;

  SELECT * FROM TABLE (DBMS_XPLAN. DISPLAY);

  Case 1.  Where COL = 50555;

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

  0 | SELECT STATEMENT |       |     1.    13.     0 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  1.  INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | IDX_T |     1.    13.     0 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

  ---------------------------------------------------

  1 - access ("COL" = 50555)

  Case 2.  Where COL = '50555';

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

  0 | SELECT STATEMENT |       |     1.    13.     0 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  1.  INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | IDX_T |     1.    13.     0 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

  ---------------------------------------------------

  1 - access ("COL" = 50555)

  Case 3.  Where TO_CHAR (COL) = 50555;

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------

  0 | SELECT STATEMENT |      |     1.    13.   470 (6) | 00:00:06 |

  1.  TABLE ACCESS FULL | T    |     1.    13.   470 (6) | 00:00:06 |

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

  ---------------------------------------------------

  1 - filter (TO_NUMBER (TO_CHAR ("COL")) = 50555)

  Case 4. Where TO_CHAR (COL) = '50555';

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------

  0 | SELECT STATEMENT |      |     1.    13.   463 (5) | 00:00:06 |

  1.  TABLE ACCESS FULL | T    |     1.    13.   463 (5) | 00:00:06 |

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

  ---------------------------------------------------

  1 - filter (TO_CHAR ("COL") = '50555')

  Why the access descriptor became predicate to filter in case 3 and 4?

  Please, help me understand.

  ACCESS (Index Scan) - Oracle tries to use an index one try to access a table row that they are interested.

  FILTER (full table scan) - Oracle has no any tool to directly get to the table of ranks it is interested in, so it must pass all the lines and then filter the rows that match the main condition.

• Vista Search & indexing does not work

  When I go to Control Panel/Indexing Options/Advanced/show Options all the locations of some files are to check, but the OS(c:) est grisée.) I had turned off at the same time & now cannot get it turned back on.

  How to make this work?

  Why indexing taking so long?

  Why can't stop indexing or turn it off for awhile (it interferes with other programs sometimes)?

  Why seek complex with a bunch of drop downs and it usually does not even get just a subfolder. I searched (using the F command) 3 letters in a title only and got a response from an area not indexed that contains NONE of the letters, and it took several minutes. @!

  Some MS answers say to use the troubleshooting Index feature, but it doesn't seem to be indexing window.

  Hello

  These two showed more problems of search for Windows 7, however, they also seem to be
  able to affect Vista as well.

  
  1. one thing that seems to have an impact on several is the bit REACH has been set on some files
  Index cannot be set and search for cannot be found. So the ATTRIB-a *. * bps, which means archive
  is REMOVED for the files in the folder/directory Parent (top) and those in all the subfolders/sup-
  directories.

  Check out this link.
  http://mikekirby.spaces.live.com/blog/CNS! E008D856FA702CAC! 758.entry

  How to play and off the read-only file and folder attribute in Windows (see the second method)
  http://www.SevenForums.com/tutorials/63741-read-only-file-folder-attribute.html

  ------------

  2 another problem seems to be McAfee and some other antivirus programs are interfering with the
  Index or search functions. McAfee, must be uninstalled using the uninstall routine in
  Windows AND the removal of McAfee too of course no remains are left. (Possibly other antivirus
  programs are also what causes this error.) Of course, you want to move to another antivirus
  MSE (Microsoft Essentials), Avast or other.

  ===============================================
  ===============================================

  Windows Search does not work or research are slower
  http://support.Microsoft.com/GP/windows_search

  Troubleshooting Windows Vista search & indexing errors
  http://www.WinVistaClub.com/T24.html

  Reconstruction of the Index in Windows Vista
  http://www.howtogeek.com/HOWTO/Windows-Vista/rebuilding-the-search-index-in-Windows-Vista/
  How to enable or disable the search Index in Vista
  http://www.Vistax64.com/tutorials/69564-index-enable-disable.html
  Improve Windows searches using the index: frequently asked questions
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/improve-Windows-searches-using-the-index-frequently-asked-questions

  ================================

  Tips for finding files
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/tips-for-finding-files

  How to use advanced search in Vista Options
  http://www.Vistax64.com/tutorials/75451-advanced-search.html

  How to restore the page button on the Start Menu after installing Vista SP1
  http://www.Vistax64.com/tutorials/145787-Search-start-menu-button-restore-after-SP1.html

  How to restore the context Menu item search after installing Vista SP1

  
  http://www.Vistax64.com/tutorials/134065-search-context-menu-item-restore-after-Vista-SP1.html

  How to create a shortcut on the desktop search in Vista
  http://www.Vistax64.com/tutorials/126499-search-desktop-shortcut.html

  ----------------------------------------------------------

  Win Key F opens advanced search

  Searching in Windows Vista, part 1
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/searching-in-Windows-Vista-part-1-secrets-of-the-search-box

  Part 2
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/searching-in-Windows-Vista-part-2-Start-menu-and-control-panel-search-tips

  Part 3
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/searching-in-Windows-Vista-part-3-using-advanced-search-for-those-hard-to-find-files

  I hope this helps.

  Rob Brown - MS MVP - Windows Desktop Experience: Bike - Mark Twain said it right.

• controlfile autobackup does not work on 11g R2

  Hi all
  
  in database 11g R2 on windows and linux os (linux machine is a virtual machine), RMAN controlfile autobackup does not work. I'm this setting on IT and adding a tablespace for the database, but there is no new files backup controlfile.
  
  Oracle documentation, I know that if you set THE controlfile autobackup on RMAN, each structural change in the database control file is saved to automaticlly. Also in the 11g R1 version I did and saw new backup controlfile is created. (to see the new backup, I use the backup RMAN list command).
  
  I check in the machine 2 windows machines and different virtual linux but for 11 g r2 there is no new backup. I couldn't find anything about it in the Oracle documentation.
  
  will there be a new change that I don't know? I will appriciate to get answers.
  
  Published by: Mustafa KALAYCI on 10.Oca.2011 16:50

  I see in the GR 11, 2 backup and recovery Reference Guide, page 98, there is a paragraph as follows:

  "Beginning with Oracle 11 g Release 2, RMAN creates a backup file auto single covering the whole of the structural changes that took place within minutes of each other rather than create a new backup of the controlfile on each structural change to the database."

  I checked all my databases again, and there is now a backup of contolfile for each of them. It seems that there is now a delay of a few minutes for the backup of the controlfile. Can you watch it again to see if you can see them on your databases?

• Table, shuffle a part of a table using start and end Index does not work properly

  Hello
  I used a method to mix a part of an array, but I noticed that it does not work very well.
  When I run this method sometimes I empty array values.

  So if you try the example below and test out a few times would get you a good result but sometimes a wrong result.

  
  For example, when I run the present I get in my trace output:

  a, b, c, d, g, e, f (here after the g it won't)

  a, b, c, f, g, d, e (here it goes right)

  a, b, c, d, g, f, e (here I'm not)

  var myArr:Array = ['a', 'b', 'c', ', 'e', 'f', 'g'];

  function shuffle(myArray:Array,_startIndex:int_=_0,_endIndex:int_=_0):Array {}
  if(endIndex == 0) endIndex = myArray.length - 1;
  for (var i: int = endIndex; I > startIndex; i--) {}
  var randomNumber:int = Math.floor (Math.random () * endIndex) + startIndex;
  var tmp: * = myArray [i];
  myArray [i] = myArray [NombrAl];
  myArray [NombrAl] = tmp;
  }
  return myArray;
  }

  trace (shuffle (myArr, 3, 5));

  No one knows where he goes wrong and why nobody on the web discovered this problem previously, because
  When I googled on this topic, I found other methods that also sometimes fail.

  Kind regards
  Chris.

  var myArr:Array = ['a', 'b', 'c', ', 'e', 'f', 'g'];

  function shuffle(myArray:Array,_startIndex:int_=_0,_endIndex:int_=_0):Array {}
  If (endIndex == 0) {}
  endIndex = myArray.length - 1;
  }
  for (var i: int = endIndex; I > = startIndex; i--) {}
  trace (i)
  var randomNumber:int = int (Math.random () * (endIndex + startIndex-1)) + startIndex;

  var tmp: * = myArray [i];
  trace (i, randomNumber)
  myArray [i] = myArray [NombrAl];
  myArray [NombrAl] = tmp;
  }
  return myArray;
  }

  trace (shuffle (myArr, 3, 5));

  There were a few issues going on here.  The first is that you used the index end to the random number, but should be the difference between the beginning and the end.  the second is the > = start index in the loop.  give this a go.

• Indexing does not work

  I have Windows 7 Starter Edition, running on HP Mini 210, as a function of Windows, indexing is turned on (enabled).  In the control panel of configuration, Indexing Options, said indexing is not running. "How can I change it to on? The Advanced button does not change that.

  Hello
  
  Which exact error message do you while trying to activate the Windows Search service?
    
  From your computer by using a minimal set of drivers and startup programs so that you can determine if a background program is interfering with your game or program. This type of boot is known as a "clean boot".
    
  Follow the steps provide in the article below to perform the clean boot. http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/929135

  Thanks and greetings
  Umesh P - Microsoft technical support.

  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.
  [If this post can help solve your problem, please click the 'Mark as answer' or 'Useful' at the top of this message.] [Marking a post as answer, or relatively useful, you help others find the answer more quickly.]

• The research of the embedded index does not work for the PDF file opened with Adobe Reader in a browser

  Due to the way in which we use our Document management system, if we want to search through multiple or large files stored in our DMS PDF we merge PDF together and create an embedded index. This works perfectly well, when you open the PDF file in Adobe Reader standalone. Enter a particular term can bring 100 hits (very quickly) in the Adobe Reader search results pane.

  However, if we launch the PDF with Adobe Reader in Internet Explorer (any version), enter a term to search (contained in document) only get one result, that of the file name of the document itself.

  Unfortunately most of our users will access our DMS documents with internal links.

  Any ideas greatly appreciated.

  K

  It is a problem with Reader 8. You must use that...

  Using Reader 9. It will work well with it.

  -Arnav Agarwal

• I don't have a navigation bar and firefox does not open in safe mode to return to the default configuration. Does not work reinstall. Any help please.

  I have no navigation bar since I closed it to have more space on the screen. It will not re - open. Firefox does not open in safe mode, but immediately opens in normal mode with the new configuration incorrect, so I can't reset to default configuration. I deleted Firefox and re-installed and it always opens with the same faulty configuration. Why doesn't Firefox give me the safe mode dialog box, why can I not re - open the navigation bar, and how I can do those two things, please? Firefox is currently unusable for me without a navigation bar with no access to the default settings in safe mode. I can't search the extensions that I use since I have no navigation bar to go to tools, modules, Extensions.

  This has happened

  Each time Firefox opened

  I closed the navigation bar to make more space on the screen and I could not re - open.

  User Agent

  Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/4.0; GTB6.4; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729 .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0)

  Press the Alt key to display the Menu bar, then open view > toolbars and select menu bar and the bar of Navigation, so that they have a check mark.

• my search index does not work

  I can't get my search for windows 7 to work. I get this error that says: search query device = % 20manager class not registered. How can I fix it

  A class not registered error means usually there is corruption in the index search or the missing DLL.

  If the problem occurred, just maybe, you can use system restore to return to a time where the search index has worked properly.
  
  Have you tried to delete and rebuild the search index
  http://helpdeskgeek.com/Windows-7/Windows-7-file-search-indexing-options/
  http://www.AddictiveTips.com/Windows-Tips/how-to-rebuild-the-search-index-in-Windows-Vista/

• Windows experience index does not work

  THE PROBLEM:
  When I try to run WEI (Windows experience index) I get this error message:
  "Windows Experience Index for your system could not be calculated.
  Could not measure the performance of storage. The temporary file necessary to perform work
  could not be placed on the drive. Unable to find a drive for the file. »

  Now of importance that I did to try to fix the problem, that nothing worked.
  Some facts related to the reason why the error occurs:
  1. my computer is a dual boot Vista and W7.
  2 WEI worked perfectly when I first installed W7.
  3 W7 is on B:\ drive. The Device Manager shows: System, starting, Active, dump, primary Partition
  4 when I started using W7, I noticed a lot of many duplicates of files in libraries.
  5. not knowing what was the role of the library, I have deleted many, if not all the files into it.
  6. Accordingly, I may be wrong deleted files than WEI needs to operate.
  7 there is no Winstat.exe anywhere on my computer
  8. I ran SFC and he finds errors, but running WEI always produces the same error message.
  Windows resource protection found corrupt files and to repair the.
  Details are provided in the
  CBS. Journal windir\Logs\CBS\CBS.log.
  For example C:\Windows\Logs\CBS\CBS.log
  9. However, strangely, it will run in the use of BACK: formal B:\Windows\system32>winsat
  10. the result is:
  Read 94,82 6.5 MB/s sequential 64.0 disc
  Random disk reading 16.0 1.83 MB/s 4.1

  After the quick fix for the problem of the text in Firefox, I hope there is an easy solution to this problem.

  Thanks for any help.

  Brian

  PA bear,

  Thanks for all the help.

  I decided to just leave things they way they are.

  Almost everything works perfectly on my computer now.

  And I learned that too much intervention can cause more problems.

  To devote more time to it is not a good use of my time or yours.

  I can't justify to devote more time to this.

  It would be preferable for you to spent time with someone who has a real problem.

  I can easily run WEI with a command prompt, it is therefore essential to set of WEI.

  Thanks again.

  Best regards

  Brian

• WITH the Clause does not work in 11g

  Hi all

  I run this query via PL/SQL developer in 11g, but it shows no data to me.

  with aquery as (c1, c2 from t1 select where c2 = 20130101) select * from aquery.

  However, when I run only the SELECT, and then it retrieves the output.

  Select c1, c2 from t1 where c2 = 20130101

  The db user privileges both CREATE MV and CREATE Table in this database.

  Thank you.

  I have no developer PL/SQL, but I do not have 11.2.0.4, and your query works for me in sqlplus and SQL Developer, the problem is with PL/SQL Developer, or maybe a transient network issue any.  You simply get an error any or all not the lines selected?

  John

• I can't turn on the index. ' It is said ' INDEX does NOT WORK.

  I tried help and support without success. Statement said go to SERVICES and turn on Windows SEarch. It is not at all here. I can't find Windows search in my PC

  What version of Vista are you using?  To make sure you looked in the right place, go to start / Control Panel / Administrative Tools / Services, and search the list for Windows Search (I found it on my PC and it is launched and automatic and I am running 32-bit Vista Business SP2).

  We will start by trying to verify some of your system files:

  Go to start / programs / accessories / command prompt and right click on command prompt and click Run as administrator.

  Type sfc/scannow, go and let it run.  He can ask your installation disc - if yes insert and continue.  It will scan some of your system files and try to fix them.  If all goes well it will finish without error, it could not repair (if it finds any errors, you can try to interpret them using http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/928228 or just post back here).

  You can also try a system restore to a point in time BEFORE this problem started first (if you have an idea, when he first started).  Here are the procedures: http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/using-windows-vista-system-restore/.  If the first attempt fails, try and point earlier or two.

  You have a genuine drive to Installation of Windows Vista?  The next troubleshooting steps may depend on if you have a copy (or can borrow one briefly to someone you know - they are not protected against copying and the version used is related to your product key).  Or did you just a disc of recovery with a recovery partition on your hard drive (which won't help us unless we need to do a clean install and that is something that we both avoid because of all the work involved and the potential loss of data).  BTW, I do a full backup of all your data in a timely and up-to-date in case a clean installation is required (or where the problem is transformed into something bigger).  I don't know how to restore all the Windows Search service on its own.

  Good luck and I hope that the suggestions above will help you with your problem.  If this isn't the case, we will have to do a repair/system upgrade to the real Windows Vista Installation disc - so try to get your hands on a copy if the procedures above do not resolve the problem. Lorien - a - MCSE/MCSA/network + / A +.

• Idle in the profiles does not work... need suggestion

  Guys,
  
  11 GR 2. Windows 2005
  
  We have a lot of idle sessions of java thin client and configure a profile to kill sessions that are inactive for more than 4 hours.
  

  select resource_name,limit from dba_profiles where profile='APP_USERS';
  
  RESOURCE_NAME                    LIMIT
  -------------------------------- ----------
  COMPOSITE_LIMIT                  DEFAULT
  SESSIONS_PER_USER                UNLIMITED
  CPU_PER_SESSION                  DEFAULT
  CPU_PER_CALL                     UNLIMITED
  LOGICAL_READS_PER_SESSION        DEFAULT
  LOGICAL_READS_PER_CALL           DEFAULT
  IDLE_TIME                        240
  CONNECT_TIME                     DEFAULT
  PRIVATE_SGA                      DEFAULT
  FAILED_LOGIN_ATTEMPTS            10
  PASSWORD_LIFE_TIME               DEFAULT
  PASSWORD_REUSE_TIME              DEFAULT
  PASSWORD_REUSE_MAX               DEFAULT
  PASSWORD_VERIFY_FUNCTION         NULL
  PASSWORD_LOCK_TIME               1
  PASSWORD_GRACE_TIME              7
  
  SQL> select username,profile from dba_users where username in ('RATOR');
  
  USERNAME                       PROFILE
  ------------------------------ ------------------------------
  SOCTT                         APP_USERS
  
  SELECT SID, SERIAL#, USERNAME,STATUS, (LAST_CALL_ET / 60) LAST_CALL_ET,
  LOGON_TIME
  FROM v$session
  WHERE username IS NOT NULL
  AND (LAST_CALL_ET / 60) > 240
  AND STATUS = 'INACTIVE';
  
  -- still showing 12 records --

  But when I ran the query to check the idle sessions that are for more than 4 hours (240 minutes), I am able to see them always
  
  They should be killed right? Correct me if im wrong.
  
  Thank you

  Hello;

  PMON will clean these sessions but he does regularly.

  Finally, it will show in v$ session as dead. Most likely your sessions are already dead and on time.

  If you want to test this connection and leave your session become inactive and then you check the connection to 241 minutes.

  Subsequently

  Salman raises a good point: (see for yourself)

  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E14072_01/server.112/e10820/initparams207.htm

  Best regards

  mseberg

  Published by: mseberg on March 26, 2013 21:03

• tilde key suddenly does not work - OSX.6 any ideas?

  Cannot find what the problem is. Key in other applications works. Have not changed anything. He can not find in the keyboard preferences file. really need to be able to optimize and reduce

  TRIS

  ignore me.

  Someone put the machine to 'English' not 'real English '.

  Time for a cup of tea, I think.

  TRIS