Patch 9239090 - ORA-04021: timeout period exceeded while waiting to lock object

Similar Questions

• ORA-04021: timeout period exceeded while waiting to lock object

  Hello
  
  DB 10.2.0.4
  
  trying to compile a package get anything below error every time, there is no blocking.
  
  ORA-04021: timeout period exceeded while waiting to lock object
  
  Thank you

  The package was in use. There are two ways to find the person who uses a package at a given time.

  You can join v$ session to dba_ddl_locks or you can use v$ acess but you can see who is running the package. The code cannot be recompiled, while the code is running.

  HTH - Mark D Powell.

• Create the error ORA-04021: timeout period exceeded while waiting to lock object

  Hello
  
  I get the following error when I try to deploy the mapping.
  Create the error ORA-04021: timeout period exceeded while waiting to lock object.
  I use OWB 10.2.0.4.36
  
  All the world is facing this problem? Kindly help me in this regard.
  
  Thank you
  Siva

  Hi Siva,

  It's probably a blocking problem.

  Select "alter system kill session"'"
  || TO_CHAR (l.session_id)
  || ','
  || to_char(s.Serial#)
  || '''; ' kill_session
  o.object_name
  l.oracle_username
  l.os_user_name
  || Chr (10)
  || '('
  || s.Terminal
  || ')' os_user_name
  v $ session s
  , v$ locked_object l
  dba_objects o
  where s.sid = l.session_id
  and l.object_id = o.object_id
  /

  The above should give you the session id

  Then use SYSTEM account to kill the session
  alter system kill session "";

  Thank you
  Fati

• Procedure crashes and closes with ORA-04021: timeout period exceeded while waiting for

  Hello
  
  I am facing a problem in which calling a procedure in a package hangs in "EXECUTE IMMEDIATE" and after a long time out with ORA-04021: timeout period exceeded while waiting.
  I faced the problem in an existing package. Then, I tried a little test and could reproduce the problem.
  Test script is:

  kallo:DZHLHFC1> cat test.sql
  
  CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY timeout_test AS
      PROCEDURE execute_immediate( p_cmd VARCHAR2 );
  
      PROCEDURE execute_immediate( p_cmd VARCHAR2 ) IS
      BEGIN
          EXECUTE IMMEDIATE p_cmd;
      EXCEPTION
          WHEN OTHERS THEN
              dbms_output.put_line( 'Command failed: '||p_cmd );
              dbms_output.put_line( 'SQL error message is: ' || SQLERRM );
      END;
  
      PROCEDURE revoke_priv(p_object_name VARCHAR2) IS
          l_cmd VARCHAR2(1000);
      BEGIN
          l_cmd := 'REVOKE EXECUTE ON "TIMEOUT_TEST" FROM "CSG_SUPP_LHOWNER_WRITE"';
          execute_immediate(l_cmd);
      END;
  
  END timeout_test;
  /
  show err
  TIMING START
  REVOKE EXECUTE ON "TIMEOUT_TEST" FROM "CSG_SUPP_LHOWNER_WRITE"; -- Check if command is syntactically correct
  TIMING SHOW
  
  set serverout on size 100000
  TIMING SHOW
  exec timeout_test.revoke_priv('TIMEOUT_TEST');
  TIMING SHOW

  When it is running, I get after release:

  Package created.
  
  Package body created.
  
  REVOKE EXECUTE ON timeout_test FROM "CSG_SUPP_LHOWNER_WRITE"
  *
  ERROR at line 1:
  ORA-01927: cannot REVOKE privileges you did not grant
  
  Elapsed: 00:00:00.01
  Elapsed: 00:00:00.02
  Command failed: REVOKE EXECUTE ON "TIMEOUT_TEST" FROM "CSG_SUPP_LHOWNER_WRITE"
  SQL error message is: ORA-04021: timeout occurred while waiting to lock object
  LHOWNER.TIMEOUT_TEST
  
  PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
  
  Elapsed: 00:15:03.03

  I did some analysis and conclusions next concluded that it hangs in "EXECUTE IMMEDIATE".
  1 TOAD "browser session" shows the current statement for this session as a course of execution with "EXECUTE IMMEDIATE"
  2. no lock appear in "browser"->"tab locks session."
  3. If I comment "EXECUTE IMMEDIATE", it comes quickly.
  
  Is - this problem with a programming or an oracle bug?
  
  Thank you and best regards,
  Hey

  Hello

  I think I found the reason.
  I'm changing the grants on the same package (TIMEOUT_TEST) which I am running.
  If I change object_name in order that it works.

  Kind regards
  Hey

• ORA - 04020:deadlock detected while trying to lock object when running catqm

  I am a newbie. Help, please.
  I improved my db from 10g to 11g using dbua and found that xmldb didn't settle. so, I install the catqm script xmldbthrough and he finds himself in a bind. My alert log complained abput the impasse. How can I stop the script now?

  As far as I KNOW, the process level to level only those components that are installed. It adds no new components. :-)

  HTH
  Srini

• Hi, my trial period exceeded and buy the complete package of the cloud Barnard for one year, while trying to download the programs continued to show me that my period obsolete preuba.

  Hi, my trial period exceeded and buy the complete package of the cloud Barnard for one year, while trying to download the programs continued to show me that my period obsolete preuba.

  If you updated to Creative Cloud 2015 and some or all of your CC applications show 'trial start or buy now' in the desktop app creative cloud, or if you launch any product of CC 2015 and the pop up displays a test message window, please check this link for the resolution:

  https://helpx.Adobe.com/manage-account-membership/CC-reverts-to-trial.html

• A transport-level error has occurred when receiving results from the server. (provider: TCP provider, error: 0 - the semaphore timeout period has expired.)

  Hello

  I get the below error message while my windows application inserts data in SQL Server.

  A transport-level error has occurred when receiving results from the server. (provider: TCP provider, error: 0 - the semaphore timeout period has expired.)

  I use LINQ-to-SQL.  SQL Server is installed on Windows server 2003.

  We are using SQL server 2008 r2.

  When we insert large data base records, approximately 1 million we get this question.

  Please suggest.

  Hello

  When you use Windows server, we ask you to send the query in the link depending on whether they are the experts.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/WindowsServer/en-us/home?category=WindowsServer

  Thank you.

• Error 0 x 80070079: the semaphore timeout period has expired.

  Original title: error 0 x 80070079: the semaphore timeout period has expired.
  

  An unexpected error prevented the operation. "and the error code" error 0 x 80070079: the semaphore timeout period has expired. ".

  I have this message when I try to copy a file of 1.6 GB on an 8GB SanDisk SDHC card

  I tried to format the card, but it will be only quick format. I've tried NTSC and FAT32, but it does the same thing.

  I have Windows Vista Home Premium, 32-bit system

  Hi bumbed.

  You have active wireless network?

  There are many suggestions that fixed the issue of which two are listed below:

  O change router security

  Ø change setting antivirus/firewall

  Method 1: Change the router security setting.

  Router change of WPA - PSK (WiFi Protected Access, pre-shared Key) at Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP). This seems to have contributed to this point.

  For more information about these security features, read:What are the different wireless network security methods?

  For more information on how to change the setting, see your router's manual or contact the manufacturer of the router.

  Method 2: Disable your firewall/antivirus

  Disable security software such as antivirus/firewalls see if it interferes with the transfer for test purposes.

  For more information about this issue, see:error 0 x 80070079: the semaphore timeout period has expired

  Note: Runs the computer without antivirus software or firewall is a potential threat to the computer; don't forget to activate the security software after completing the troubleshooting steps and after you have identified the problem.

  Kind regards

  Shinmila H - Microsoft Support

  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

• Error 0 x 80070079 windows 7 x 64 win7 - when you try to copy large files to USB. The semaphore timeout period has expired. Help, please!

  Any file larger and begins to copy and Quen stops about 95 to 98% before its finshed. This is some time and comes back with an error 0 x 80070079: the semaphore timeout period has expired. If I boot in safe mode, I get the same thing. I applied http://support.microsoft.com/kb/976972 and it did not help me. Help, please!

  I have Dell XPS9000, Win7 Premium, x 64, I7/920, Nvidia 260, 12 GB of RAM

  Hello

  Thanks for the reply Thahaseena. I think a lot of people have the same problem and it's partially the fault of Microsoft. It is the solution of the problem that works for most people if the heart of the problem is corrupt USB driver (s). The USB driver might get damaged due to defective USB device. This was my case. I bought the 16 GB Sandisk USB which has serious problems. It seems that it is real default, rather than fake. However, I am still investigating.

  This is what happens:

  -Start the copy of the file and at one point gets stuck. After all, you get that infamous error 0 x 80070079. If you try to shoot this defective USB before the error pops out, it's really dangerous abduction of USB that could cause corruption of the driver for the USB controller. This happened to me. So, after this point, none of the USB devices will be capable of the greatest copy files 1 GB +, because my USB drivers are now corrupt and and the transfer is slower. Fast devices and more small files work great, but if you have low speed USB 2.0 device it will not be able to complete the transfer of files at one time and you will receive the error.

  Solution:

  -Stop using the defective device to avoid a repetition of the problem (if you know who is defective). If you do not know, must be eliminated one by one.

  -Disconnect all USB cables except the keyboard cable (at least that is not based USB)

  -Use tabs and the arrows on the keyboard to get to Device Manager

  -Remove all usb drivers, including the one that is connected to the keyboard

  -You may need to force the closure - the dawn of the computer.

  -Do not turn on computer. Get on your knees and unplug the power cord. If you forget this step, the process of booth PC will load faulty driver again. (faulty or bad it depends on the scenario)

  -By unplugging the power cord and let it stay for at least 5 minutes, you force your PC to renegotiate the devices and drivers

  -Connect all USB cables

  -Check the usb status icon in the status bar. Sometimes, you may need to restart the computer if windows asks you to do. Restart the computer if you are not sure what I'm talking about.

  - and... Here we are. Bingo!

  Now, if you plug the faulty device once again, you will need to repeat the process. However, in my case I return to the seller or the manufacturer for repair. You can use this procedure to force the outcrop of USB drivers. That's why I say I blame partially Microsoft for that matter because there is no utility or command available to force this action automatically do that when the problem occurs. This could potentially help people with the question when a few USB ports stop working if its pilots involved.

  If it worked for you, please press useful Votes.

  Thank you.

  Ntongo

• USB 3.0 Port at random times out the error "semaphore timeout period has expired.

  My USB 3.0 port randomly shuts down completely. I sometimes get a message that says "the semaphore timeout period has expired." I disabled USB selective suspend and verified that the port is functional (Device Manager) and even used my drive hard/USB stick/mouse wireless mouse in the regular USB 2.0 ports. 2.0 ports both products I work very well. Moreover, the stop device, is not related to the volume or type of media, that I'm going through. Yes, any driver alone on my computer is 100% up-to-date (from validation). How can I change this? I feel that I lost all the money on my new USB 3.0 hard drive.

  Windows 7, 64-bit.

  I also had the same problem and host controller Renesas usb3.

  I went to the site intel and downloaded this driver

  https://Downloadcenter.Intel.com/Detail_Desc.aspx?DwnldID=19880&lang=eng

  My driver usb3 was updated according to Microsoft and Lenovo.

  Former pilot was 2.0.32.0 according to Lenovo.

  My external drive USB3 now works correctly and not cut or hang PCs.

  No help on Microsoft or Lenovo websites regarding this issue, but it is a HUGE problem.

• A timeout occurred while waiting for the host controller EHCI interrupt on answer Async ahead Bell.

  Whenever I put my adapter wireless netgear n150 under heavy load (download of World of Warcraft for example), it will go down to connection and until I restart the computer the adapter usb port is useless.  I dug into the event viewer and found that a timeout occurred while waiting for the EHCI host controller interrupt on the asynchronous response advance doorbell, source usbehci.  This seems to have been a problem with windows 8 I found other threads referencing but I can say that they are pre-release and some actually work solutions have been validated.  I already assured that all drivers, firmware and chipsets are up-to-date and compatible.  ANYONE please help?

  Quick fix I found:

  -try falling back to WiFi G rather than use N
  In my case, it works... is no longer a fall. But not the same bandwidth...

• I have reset my system without disabling the acrobat 8.0 writer. Now when I am trying to activate I get message 'Maximum Activations exceeded', while trying to activate the software, please suggest what to do to activate...

  I have reset my system without disabling the acrobat 8.0 writer. Now when I am trying to activate I get message 'Maximum Activations exceeded', while trying to activate the software, please suggest what to do to activate...

  Contact adobe support by clicking on this link then "still need help" as soon as it appears, https://helpx.adobe.com/contact.html . request a reset of count of activation.

• The semaphore timeout period has expired

  Hello

  on FSCM90, 8.49 on Win 2003 tools, the batch will fail with the following error:

  Failure of SQL stmt: SELECT MESSAGE_SEQ FROM PS_MESSAGE_LOG WHERE PROCESS_INSTANCE =: 1 AND MESSAGE_SEQ =: 2 FOR UPDATE OF PROCESS_INSTANCE

  File: error e:\pt84920b-retail\peopletools\src\psappeng\aedebug.hSQL. Stmt #: 1603 error Position: 0 return: 8200 - provider TCP [Microsoft] [SQL Native Client]: the semaphore timeout period has expired.

  I don't see what the problem is. By the semaphore timeout period has expired we can guess the problem?

  Thank you.

  Yes network problem. Running successfully, and once again finished.

• I m error when i m to access the Manager version alb 3. "expired.the timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool.this have bcz grouped all connection used and maximum pool size has been reached.

  Hi team,

  I m error when i m to access the Manager version alb 3. "expired.the timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool.this have bcz grouped all connection used and maximum pool size has been reached.

  Please provide the solution.

  Concerning

  Ajay

  Discussion moved from the Knowledge Base of VMware Lab Manager

• Cannot install the patch 9239090 because of the mistake of adrelink

  Hello

  I register patch 9239090 for the upgrade of Oracle EBS 12.1.1 to 12.1.3

  But I get the following error:-

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Reissue of executable links...

  / bin/sh: /apps/devapp/appl/apps/apps_st/appl/ad/12.0.0/bin/adrelinknew.sh: / bin/sh ^ M: Bad interpreter: no such file or directory

  An error occurred during re-Association of the application programs.

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  
  

  Can you please help.
  

  Hello

  Please find the file adrelink.log, adrelinknew.sh, and Journal of the patch attached to the link below.

  https://docs.Google.com/file/d/0B_bzj8IFyvCRUVMwUjdfaUhCcEk/edit?USP=sharing

  One of my observation is that the adrelinklog file not updated this time where I applied the patch.

  Thank you

  Patricia