ORA - 04020:deadlock detected while trying to lock object when running catqm

Similar Questions

• ORA-00060: Deadlock detected while you wait resource

  Hello
  
  I have a trigger to an underlying table. It fires after that insertion of the events in the underlying table. When I try to update some columns in a table underlying even within the trigger, I get the error below.
  
  ORA-00060: Deadlock detected while you wait resource
  
  Can anyone clear or correct me.
  
  Thank you

  Ignore the Aurélie. It is just a spammer who is trying to promote some criminal website.

  A deadlock occurred if two different sessions lock resources. Each session can wait the other session ends.

  I suppose that you set up a trigger and use the 'autonomous transaction' wrongly to a commit. This function creates a new session. Now you have two (or more) session that could create deadlock. Committing inside a trigger from the table is ALWAYS bad (with some exceptions).

  Solution: remove the pragma of your relaxation. Then the other problems you get with it.

• ORA-00060: Deadlock detected while you wait the cursor CLOSE resource

  Hello
  
  I am a new Member of this forum. I work with a problem that we have obtained a few weeks ago. It runs in the lot C Pro executable on 10 threads dealing with > 800 data accessed from more than one table. The error, such as reported was a package.function call.
  
  This is the error I encountered:
  process_item ~ G *, D * ~-60 ~ ORA-00060: Deadlock detected while you wait resources ~ PACKAGE ERROR = cursor CLOSE C_ * in the R package *. I * 7641
  
  The slider is a simple SELECT without Table or record locking.
  
  My questions are:
  * During the occurrence of this error, execution is already in the line of the CLOSE cursor or did the error has occurred between the OPEN and the CLOSE slider? There are several lines of code between the OPENING and CLOSING:
  -one who calls to a package.function that simply stores the values of parameter to a variable
  -another one that retrieves the cursor. The group that contains the values of the cursor is used only by a single function in the package
  
  * Is it possible for this CLOSE cursor cause a deadlock? What could have caused this?
  
  * From what I know, Oracle treats blocks by abandoning the blocking process, while others continue, but this impasse caused our program to hang. How is that possible? The origin of the impasse might be our Threading program? This is a rare event and has past that twice this year.
  
  Thank you
  RAF

  RAF Serrano wrote:
  I see, so it be that blocking has occurred before the CLOSE cursor or it occurred during CLOSING? The cause could be executable ProC

  first cause is NOT ProC

  or is it really an error in PL/SQL

  first cause is NOT PL/SQL.

  cause of ORA-00060 is DML (INSERT, UPDATE, or DELETE)

• Patch 9239090 - ORA-04021: timeout period exceeded while waiting to lock object

  
  Hello guys,.

  I need emergency aid to comlete an upgrade to ebs 12.1.1 to 12.1.3.

  We are to modernize ebs 11i to 12i will live this weekend. We met "ORA-04021: timeout exceeded while waiting to lock object" on patch 9239090 with two workers:

  In adctrl:

  1. run AutoPatch R120 AFUTLGRS.pls failed

  2. run AutoPatch R120 AFUTLOGS.pls failed

  sqlplus s APPS / * @/u02/applfinp/apps/apps_st/appl/admin/OFPROD/out/p001invok.sql

  Connected.

  create or replace package wf_bes_cleanup AUTHID CURRENT_USER as

  *

  ERROR on line 1:

  ORA-04021: timeout period exceeded while waiting to lock object

  I did everything imaginable, but can not get pass these 2 workers failed.

  (1) I checked there is no lock blocking on all objects:

  Select s1.username. '@' || S1.machine

  || ' (SID =' | s1.sid | block him ') '

  || S2. UserName | '@' || S2.machine | ' (SID =' | s2.sid |) ') ' AS blocking_status

  v $ lock l1, v$ session s1, v$ lock l2, s2 of v$ session

  where s1.sid = l1.sid and s2.sid = l2.sid

  and l1. BLOCK = 1 and l2.request > 0

  and l1.id1 = l2.id1

  and l2.id2 = l2.id2;

  (2) I also checked and there is space in the database.

  (3) adctrl, I tried to restart the positions one by one, but the worker 1 crashes at and fails finally on several attempts (12).

  4) the solution on Doc ID 1291064.1 is not the problem:

  SQL > select SUPPLEMENTAL_LOG_DATA_MIN, SUPPLEMENTAL_LOG_DATA_PK, SUPPLEMENTAL_LOG_DATA_UI, FORCE_LOGGING

  database of v$.

  SUP SUP SUBSECTIONS FOR

  -------- --- --- ---

  NO NO NO NO

  (5) enforcement of manual still gives ORA-04021:

  sqlplus s APPS/apps @/u02/applfinp/apps/apps_st/appl/admin/OFPROD/out/p001invok.sql

  sqlplus s APPS/apps @/u02/applfinp/apps/apps_st/appl/admin/OFPROD/out/p002invok.sql

  (6) the alerts log has no related errors

  (7) I finally, after more than 6 hours of waiting, I could only get the patch to continue after using the adctrl option 8 to ignore these two workers.

  After the procedure, I struck still more than two errors and now stuck:

  I hit another error with the same patch:

  create or replace package FND_LOG as body

  / * $Header: AFUTLOGB.pls 120...

  AD worker error:

  ORA-04021: timeout period exceeded while waiting to lock object

  Unable to process the file in PACKET mode.

  Do not convert the file for the rights of the appellant because she seems to be a create package body script (based on the name of the file).

  File: /u02/applfinp/apps/apps_st/appl/fnd/12.0.0/patch/115/sql/AFUTLOGB.pls

  *********************************************

  Worker AD WARNING:

  Product data file

  /U02/applfinp/apps/apps_st/appl/Admin/xniprod.txt

  There is no product "number".

  This product is registered in the database, but the file above does not exist in APPL_TOP.  The product will be ignored without error

  **********************************************

  AD worker error:
  The following ORACLE error:

  ORA-04063: package body "APPS. FND_LOG"contains errors
  ORA-06508: PL/SQL: called program unit is not found: 'APPS. FND_LOG ".
  ORA-06512: at the 'APPS '. FND_FUNCTION', line 834
  ORA-06512: at the 'APPS '. FND_MENU_ENTRIES_C_DELTRG', line 4
  ORA-04088: error during execution of trigger ' APPS. FND_MENU_ENTRIES_C_DELTRG'

  Can I stop and restart it patch 9239090 ?

  Solved by running scripts workers failed manually at a later date. :

  sqlplus-s @/u02/applfinp/apps/apps_st/appl/admin/OFPROD/out/p001invok.sql APPS/apps

  sqlplus-s @/u02/applfinp/apps/apps_st/appl/admin/OFPROD/out/p002invok.sql APPS/apps

  Thank you

• ORA-04021: timeout period exceeded while waiting to lock object

  Hello
  
  DB 10.2.0.4
  
  trying to compile a package get anything below error every time, there is no blocking.
  
  ORA-04021: timeout period exceeded while waiting to lock object
  
  Thank you

  The package was in use. There are two ways to find the person who uses a package at a given time.

  You can join v$ session to dba_ddl_locks or you can use v$ acess but you can see who is running the package. The code cannot be recompiled, while the code is running.

  HTH - Mark D Powell.

• Error detected while trying to perform the work

  Hello world

  
  

  One of my users tried to run a rule in Hyperion Planning 11.1.1.3 and an error occurred: error detected while trying to perform the work

  
  

  When I went to Essbase, I found that when I launched the rule an error pops up:

  
  

  ERROR - 1006059 - invalid block header: illegal block type - please use the IBH Locate/Fix utilities to find or fix the problem of IBH.

  
  

  I read it could be a problem with corrupt blocks. I'm not familiar with MXL and I read that there are commands that I could run. Someody could give me a help?

  
  

  Kind regards
  

  IBH errors when there is an incompatibility between the .pag file and the index file (.ind). In other words the file pag and .ind file are not synchronized.

  run it separately in maxl

  change the HYPCOLAN database. Invalid_block_headers repair COSTS

  Still the error ibh, then reload metadata and data backups and try to re start batch Scheduler.

  After re - run batch Scheduler the same problem persists, then

  1 save the relational tables of demand in 11.1.1.3

  2 backup essbase objects (rul, otl, CSC, rep)

  Planning enforcement

  (A) create a new planning application

  (B) restore all the 11.1.1.3 relational tables in the newly created application application

  (C) to restart the Services

  (d) copies of objects like .csc, rul, .rep in db (excluding the .otl)

  (e) re - import the data into db

  (f) to run batch Scheduler

  Or you can make use of LCM method

  Try also to optimize your planning applications

  Kind regards

  Sreekumar heraud

• Create the error ORA-04021: timeout period exceeded while waiting to lock object

  Hello
  
  I get the following error when I try to deploy the mapping.
  Create the error ORA-04021: timeout period exceeded while waiting to lock object.
  I use OWB 10.2.0.4.36
  
  All the world is facing this problem? Kindly help me in this regard.
  
  Thank you
  Siva

  Hi Siva,

  It's probably a blocking problem.

  Select "alter system kill session"'"
  || TO_CHAR (l.session_id)
  || ','
  || to_char(s.Serial#)
  || '''; ' kill_session
  o.object_name
  l.oracle_username
  l.os_user_name
  || Chr (10)
  || '('
  || s.Terminal
  || ')' os_user_name
  v $ session s
  , v$ locked_object l
  dba_objects o
  where s.sid = l.session_id
  and l.object_id = o.object_id
  /

  The above should give you the session id

  Then use SYSTEM account to kill the session
  alter system kill session "";

  Thank you
  Fati

• ORA-000060: Deadlock detected. More info in file filename.trc

  Friends,
  
  DB: oracle 9iR2
  

  *** 2008-11-12 11:22:11.895
  *** SESSION ID:(112.20587) 2008-11-12 11:22:11.884
  DEADLOCK DETECTED
  Current SQL statement for this session:
  UPDATE SCM_MR_ENGR_DTL SET.........................(deleted space consuming)
  The following deadlock is not an ORACLE error. It is a
  deadlock due to user error in the design of an application
  or from issuing incorrect ad-hoc SQL. The following
  information may aid in determining the deadlock:
  Deadlock graph:
                         ---------Blocker(s)--------  ---------Waiter(s)---------
  Resource Name          process session holds waits  process session holds waits
  TX-00080007-000148b4        97     112     X             80     104           X
  TX-0004000a-00014e7f        80     104     X             97     112           X
  session 112: DID 0001-0061-000007BC     session 104: DID 0001-0050-00000733
  session 104: DID 0001-0050-00000733     session 112: DID 0001-0061-000007BC
  Rows waited on:
  Session 104: obj - rowid = 000079E2 - AAAHniAAGAAA7LrAAR
    (dictionary objn - 31202, file - 6, block - 242411, slot - 17)
  Session 112: obj - rowid = 000079E0 - AAAHngAAGAAA0lrABc
    (dictionary objn - 31200, file - 6, block - 215403, slot - 92)
  Information on the OTHER waiting sessions:
  Session 104:
    pid=80 serial=19532 audsid=971660 user: 45/NMS
    O/S info: user: matur, term: ANOP-KMCH-151, ospid: 3668:2272, machine: NMS\ANOP-KMCH-151
              program: 
    Current SQL Statement:
    
  UPDATE SCM_MR_HD SET ................ (deleted space consuming)
  End of information on OTHER waiting sessions.

  is this block will be automatically released?
  It will cause any problem?
  What should I do?

  Hello..

  This lock will be automatically released. If you encounter a lot of blocking issues, you can increase the INITRANS of this parameter. We also had a blocking problem on a production database, we found was due to a trigger. So, you can also check the triggers.

  You can find some good Articles on Metalink:

  1 doc ID: Note: 164661.1

  2 doc ID: Note: 115467.1

  3 doc ID: Note: 62365.1

  HTH
  Anand

• has received the error ORA-44416: invalid ACL, while trying to enable network services

  Hi guys I got the ERROR ORA-44416 after the activation of services network in 11 GR 2 to send emails, so I ran this command found just as shown below in the Oracle document library

  SELECT THE ACL, PRINCIPAL

  OF NACL, XDS_ACE ACE DBA_NETWORK_ACLS

  WHERE HOST = ' *' AND LOWER_PORT IS NULL AND UPPER_PORT IS NULL AND

  NACL. ACLID = ACE. ACLID AND

  ARE NOT (SELECT NULL FROM ALL_USERS WHERE USERNAME = MAIN);

  That returned a result of

  no selected line

  What could this mean

  The installation is done on a localhost and the APEX version is 4.2.2 browser is mozilla fire fox

  ORA-44416 means that the ACL that you tried to create to refer to a valid principle - that is, the user does not exist.

  The SQL code that you included above seems to be looking for associated ACL principles which are more database users. I don't see a direct link between this request and the ORA-44416.

  What was your original script of ACL?

  Also, because it is a question of database rather APEX you might get a better answer on the forums of the database.

• 2 Apple Watch water lock on when running

  Question: Is the 'blocking of water,"the only option"lock"now in workouts on Apple Watch 2?

  When I run and use that as the '' restructuring '' selected, I want to "lock" my watch, so if I hit it, it not disturbed.  With the new Apple Watch 2, option 'lock' is now the 'blocking of the water", so when I unlock it, it makes the sound as to empty all the water. Where as with Apple Watch 1, you have the normal locking option.

  Thank you!

  "Avoid bycatches. If the exercise you do or equipment you wear causes accidental taps on Apple Watch, lock the screen if your training record is not interrupted. Glisser slide to the right, then press the lock. To unlock the screen, turn the digital Crown. »

  Apple Watch 2, when you drag to the right, the lock with the lock icon option is there, just the drop of water, put it in the water not lock mode.

  Hello

  The water lock icon is certainly what is shown during a training run in the open air, place the padlock icon that is indicated by Apple in the supporting documentation for the application of the training session:

  • Work with your Apple Watch - Apple Support

  You may want to Apple did know out:

  • https://www.Apple.com/feedback/watch.html

• Get the error ORA-39146 while trying to import data from 10 g to 12 c

  Hi all

  
  

  im getting below error while trying to import data from 10 g to 12 c
  

  
  

  ORA-39146: schema 'B_SITES' does not exist
  import in WE8MSWIN1252 and AL16UTF16 NCHAR character set
  export in the UTF8 character set and AL16UTF16 NCHAR character set
  ATTENTION: the possible loss of data to character set conversions

  
  

  can someone help how do we change to WE8MSWIN1252 UTF8 character set...
  

  Hello

  "ORA-39146: there is no schema 'B_SITES'.

  ORA-39146: schema 'string' does not exist

  Cause: The specified schema was referenced as the source of a REMAP_SCHEMA parameter, but did not exist in the dump file (for

  Action: Specify the correct name of the schema to be remapped.

  Anand

• While trying to install windows xp on my computer, it displays the search for previous versions of windows and then locks the system.

  XP installation problem

  while trying to install windows xp on my computer (processor i3), she shows looking for previous versions of windows and then crashes the system. So please give me a solution

  Hi deva_reddy,

  Looks like you are trying to do a repair of windows xp installation.

  You use a windows installation cd?

  Refer to the link below for the procedure to install windows XP using different methods.

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/978307

  Hope the helpfu.

• DEADLOCK DETECTED - DELETE statement - how/why he expects in SHARING mode?

  Hello
  
  I wonder if anyone can advise here. The environment is:
  
  Microsoft Windows 2003 Server
  Standard Oracle 10.2.0.4 Edition
  
  We had a deadlock detected in our application on a customer site - I enclose the corresponding part of the trace file below. While we think we have found the reason for the deadlock (looks like it is due to a foreign key in cascade), I'm confused as the lock mode that is requested.
  
  Here is the track information:
  

  Deadlock graph:
                         ---------Blocker(s)--------  ---------Waiter(s)---------
  Resource Name          process session holds waits  process session holds waits
  TX-00120012-00003b59        28     475     X             29     481           S
  TX-000a0029-0003508b        29     481     X             28     475           X
  session 475: DID 0001-001C-000F96B0     session 481: DID 0001-001D-00000079
  session 481: DID 0001-001D-00000079     session 475: DID 0001-001C-000F96B0
  Rows waited on:
  Session 481: no row
  Session 475: obj - rowid = 00014625 - AAAUYlAAIAAAAawAAo
    (dictionary objn - 83493, file - 8, block - 1712, slot - 40)
  Information on the OTHER waiting sessions:
  Session 481:
    pid=29 serial=18261 audsid=202192707 user: 51/info
    O/S info: user: SYSTEM, term: our_term, ospid: 5244:940, machine: our_machine
              program: our_exe.exe
    client info: GUI
    application name: app, hash value=3864155245
    action name: our_action, hash value=3631189430
    Current SQL Statement:
    DELETE FROM TABLE_1 T WHERE T.T_ID = :B1
  End of information on OTHER waiting sessions.
  Current SQL statement for this session:
  UPDATE TABLE_1 T SET T.STATUS_ID = :B2 WHERE T.T_ID = :B1 

  It seems to me like session * 481 * trying to do a deletion when the block is raised:
  

   DELETE FROM TABLE_1 T WHERE T.T_ID = :B1

  and ask which mode (dynamique31) S .

                                     ---------Blocker(s)--------  ---------Waiter(s)---------
  Resource Name          process session holds waits  process session holds waits
  TX-00120012-00003b59        28     475     X             29     481           S

  (also the 'no line' for lines didn't wait)
  

  Session 481: no row

  I thought it would be in mode (e) X (clusive) (for the line being deleted). Actually Yes, I set up a test of fast and simple locking and mode (e) X (is) expected the final delete .
  
  So, am I misinterpreted the tracing information, or is the DELETE statement requesting the lock in mode S (Hare)? If this is the case, I'd appreciate a quick explanation of how/why it's...
  
  
  
  Kind regards
  
  ADOS

  I think we have almost the same reason to wait in S mode as in [single key application | http://books.google.pl/books?id=14OmJzfCfXMC&dq=oracle+wait+interface+practical+guide&q=unique+key+enforcement].
  If two sessions want to insert the same key value, the other must wait, because the outcome depends on a commit / rollback of the first session. In the case of validation, session 2 must generate an error in case of cancellation, it must insert his record.

  In the test provided by ADOS, at session 1 there is an insert in session 2 - delete. The result of the delete operation depends, once again, commit or rollback in the first session. In the case of validation, it must remove, and cancellations, there is nothing to remove.

  If the insert in session 1 has been replaced by the Update, there is no S lock but 'normal' eXclusive

  Bartek

• Deadlock detected

  Hello
  
  all applying patch workers got faile dand I checked the logs and newspaper said dected deadlock.
  So I checked the newspaper alert... and alert a mistake to show who headed one of the trace files...
  and I got the following info from the trace file
  
  
  Release 9.2.0.8.0 - Production jserver
  ORACLE_HOME = /bustools/oracle/v01/product/9.2.0.8
  Name of the system: AIX
  Name of the node: AIXAPP01
  Press release: 3
  Version: 5
  Machine: 00SBFC005A01
  Instance name: DPAPPL01
  Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
  Oracle process number: 44
  The Unix process PID: 1269774, image: oracle@aixapp01 (TNS V1 - V3)
  
  SESSION ID: (103.4753) 2009-06-27 08:15:37.952
  DEADLOCK DETECTED (ORA-00060)
  The following deadlock is not an ORACLE error. It's a
  deadlock due to the error of the user in the design of an application
  or deliver incorrect SQL ad hoc. What follows
  information can help determine the impasse:
  Deadlock graph event:
  -Blockers - Waiter (s).
  Resource name process session held process session expected holds expected
  TX-00020015-00017e5b 44 50 103 X 42 X
  TX-00060013-000274aa 42 50 X 44 103 X
  session 103: IS 0001-002C-00002EFE session 50: 0001-002 a-00002E67
  session 50: FACT a 0001-002 - 00002E67 session 103: have you 0001-002C-00002EFE
  Expected number of lines:
  Session 50: obj - rowid = 000A2C20 - AACiwgAFbAAAI5zAAZ
  (dictionary objn - 666656, file - 347, block - 36467, sub - 25 machine)
  Session 103: obj - rowid = 000A2C20 - AACiwgAFbAAAI5yACK
  (dictionary objn - 666656, file - 347, block - 36466, machine slot - 138)
  Information about OTHER sessions of waiting:
  Session 50:
  PID = 42 series = 18272 audsid = user 1382965: 69/APPS
  Info of the o/s: user: dpaappl01, term: pts/1, ospid: 1478862, machine: aixapp01
  program:
  Customer Info: 055 AY385 N
  Current SQL statement:
  
  
  so now, how to get the SID and SPID and serail #.
  
  and in the light of the foregoing, I see unix process pid 1269774 and ospid = 1478862...
  I'm not clear on this topic so plese I want what sid pid spid and and ospid...
  
  Thank you

  Hello

  You can refer to the following ML doc to get a complete idea about the issue.

  [ORA-60 / locks the more frequent Causes | https://metalink2.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=164661.1]

  [What to do with ORA-60 deadlock errors | https://metalink2.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=62365.1]

  Thank you
  Anchorage :)

• While trying to reinstall my wireless mouse is not find it

  While trying to reinstall my wireless mouse is not finding it. The mouse was working fine and then all of a sudden mouse does not. I tried to power on then turn on the computer and that did not help.

  Hello
  • You receive an error message in the Device Manager?
  • What is the brand and model of the wireless mouse?
  You can view these methods:
  Method 1:
  Check if the mouse works fine on any other computer.
  Method 2:
  Hardware devices do not work or are not detected in Windows
  http://support.Microsoft.com/mats/hardware_device_problems/en-us
  Method 3:
  Troubleshoot the incidents of the response to the mouse or wireless keyboard
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/838398