Pavilian HPE: Benefits of the execution of a judgment?

Similar Questions

• Satellite A660 - 11 M: benefits of the update of the Bios

  What are the benefits of the update of the bios. (ive never done)
  Since then I've seen on the forums of toshiba how its so complicated to do.

  So I'm wonering if its worth the practice, what can I expect? What will get better after update?

  THX in advance :)

  Hi mate

  Don t expect anything if you have no problems with your laptop.
  BIOS update is the very delicate process and if you have no problem with the laptop, you shouldn't have to date.

  You know you would need assistance from service provider authorized if something goes wrong with the update of the BIOS.

  Therefore, never change a running system

• What are the benefits should the software Intel offers compared to Win zero configuration

  (Satellite M60, Intel 2200BG)
  A few months ago Intel released new software WLAN (a major problem for the security, etc.). Initially, there was a memory leak problem, but he was soon fixed. However, they always seem to be a resource hog: there is the CPU usage in the Task Manager on the cob of 10 to 20% every 5 seconds all the time, also WIFI turned off & off, overall performance is affected - this can be seen for example in the tests of hard drive.

  I noticed that in order to use windows to configure WLAN & then kill two switching processes (iFramework, S32EvMon (?)) eliminates this activity.
  Recently, new Intel drivers are offered by Toshiba also, so I'm about to reinstall them with the option "drivers only".

  Anyone know what are the benefits should the full Intel software offer compared to Windows zero configuration?
  As far as I know, monitor event S32 is supposed to improve coordination Intel WLAN and LAN, working together.

  The new package is about 50MB in size, while the former was 2MB.

  Hi Sammo

  You have already preinstalled new driver? The package is really about 50 MB and Intel PROSet utility.

  I can tell you that offers software Intel the same configuration options of Windows. Maybe Utility Intel PROSet is friendly and kind but designed WLAN Windows settings by using, you can exactly the same.

  If you have more info on the download package and installation please let us know.

• How to shorten the execution time of the NXT (TETRIX & MATRIX toolkit) brick

  Hello

  How to shorten the execution time of the NXT brick?

  (TETRIX & MATRIX toolkit, running time)

  The software is 2012 LabVIEW for LEGO MINDSTORMS

  Thank you.

  

  

  Hi 40123157,

  You use the module in an appropriate manner, and there is no simple way to improve the time of loop iteration beyond what you've done. Here are my suggestions:

  (1) the i2c commands take a long time. In your application, it may speed up if you run only move the engine only when the engine speed has changed.

  (2) for this particular example, you do not use the release of the report engine. If this VI does not need to run it can be removed.

  (3) If you need to speed up execution other than that, as a user advanced LabVIEW, you can create a copy of the VI of engines to move and change it as you choose. All you have to to the "DC motors' entry is use cluster to array on the cluster, as shown below. I think you can speed it up by running all the settings before the loop (type sensor and fixed connection configuration), and removing the value of power if you send only the values between-100 and 100.

  (4) drawing on the screen can be slow you down here.

  

• How to calculate the execution time of a SCTL in FPGA VI?

  Hello

  Can someone guide me that how to calculate the execution time of a SCTL for an iteration in the FPGA VI?

  Thank you and best regards,

  Rashid

  Hello r,.

  A SCTL will always run in a beat the clock it has been linked to.  So, if you use a 40 MHz clock, this loop will run in 25 ns.  If the code cannot complete in that, or if it requires two graduations of the watch to do the calculation, your code does not compile, then you have the guarantee that this will always be how long it takes this piece of code to run.

• How can I retrieve the execution of TestStand 4.0 Test results in a c sharp Application?

  I am writing a c sharp application to launch a test sequence in TestStand 4.0.1 and then collect the results of the tests to update our own screens / report (s).  I'll need some sort of recursive routine to collect the following information (if available) for each stage: name, result, Min value, Max Value, measured value, units.

  My attempts have been to an event to end execution allows to collect data:

  void EndExecution (sender As object, EndExecutionEvent ev)
  {
  Results PropertyObject = ev.exec.ResultObject.GetPropertyObject ("ResultList", 0);

  int numContainers = Results.GetNumElements ();

  for (int i = 0; i)< numcontainers;="">
  {
  PropertyObject resultData = results. GetPropertyObjectByOffset (i, 0);
  String testResult = resultData.GetValString ("Status", 0). ToString();

  PropertyObject testStep = resultData.GetPropertyObject ("TS", 0);
  Dim testName = testStep.GetValString ("StepName", 0). ToString();

  MessageBox.Show (i.ToString () + "". "") testName + "=" + testResult);
  }
  }

  But this only gives me MainSequence data.

  How to cross the ResultsList tree to access the results of all the test steps?

  tlaford,

  There are a couple of big problems with what you are doing:

  (1) it is best to call the code from a test report of the result of your sequence treatment reminder (just use an action step) or change the process template to call your code rather than to call for EndExecutionEventHandler of the user interface, because if you use Test DUT and then there is a separate resultlist by USE not by execution, and it is generally processed at the end of each use not at the end of execution. If you use the EndExecutionEventHandler then you should NOT use the process templates provided with TestStand because they don't work that way. Instead, you just run your sequences without a process template. Although I really recommend the path of process model, even if you write your own a custom, because it is more flexible, and then hardcode your treatment result in the user interface as you do. A few reasons why a process model is that more flexible or better are that it will work in any user interface, including the sequence editor (no changes to the user interface is needed), and it can do everything you can do in a sequence, for example to call a code module in any language supported , asynchronous sequences, call sous-séquences, etc.

  2 recursion) through each property at such a low level is bad because the names of the properties are not guaranteed to be unique for what you expect them to be. Anyone can write their own types step custom with some result properties that they would like. You must make sure that the full path to the properties is what you expect it, and you can even check that the type of step is one you expect. You should rather loop through the result of higher level items ONLY and are looking for the complete data lookupstrings that you expect from these elements. For example, instead of WalkTree you might have the following instead:

  This must be called from a step in a test recall report or in a custom process template
  rather than from EndExecutionEventHandler of the user interface, because if you use Test DUT then
  There is a separate resultlist by USE, not by execution, and it is usually processed
  at the end of each use not at the end of execution.
  Sub ProcessResultList (PropertyObject resultList)
  {
  	numElements int = resultList.GetNumElements ();
  	< numelements;="">
  	{
  		Element PropertyObject = resultList.GetPropertyObjectByOffset (i, 0);
  		String stepTypeName = string. Empty;
  If (point. There are ("TS. ((StepType', 0))
  			stepTypeName = GetValString ("TS. (StepType", 0);
  If (stepTypeName is "NumericLimitTest")
  		{
  			If (point. Exists ("Limits.High", 0))
  			{
  				 Double highLimit = item. GetValNumber ("Limits.High", 0);
  				 Do something with the value
  			}
  		}

  NOTE: The two step type SequenceCall and NI_Wait can have subresults like that. A stage of waiting waiting on an asynchronous thread or the execution will have this.
  If (point. There are ("TS. ((SequenceCall.ResultList', 0))
  {
  Recurse for results call sequence.
  PropertyObject sequenceCallResultList = item. GetPropertyObject ("TS. (SequenceCall.ResultList', 0);
  ProcessResultList (sequenceCallResultList);
  }
  }
  }

  Hope this helps to clear things up,

  -Doug

• Pause the execution of a Vi

  Hello

  I'm making an aplication with two main Vi. The first Vi is responsible for the configuration of different instruments. On the other hand, the second Vi is responsible for the different measures of an electronic circuit.

  My problem is that I want to pause the first Vi when configurations were carried out then go to the second Vi and carry out measures. When the measurements were made, execution must return to the first Vi and continues from the point where the program has been suspended.

  I am trying to solve this problem with the queues and some time a loop to stay the execution, but it does not work properly.

  The following picture, I have attached the while loop. This loop communicates with the Vi second to check whether or not the measures are completed. But it is not working properly and I don't know why. My question is: this method is good to solve this problem or there is another method better than this? Or quite simply, the break of a Vi enforcement cannot be done.

  

  Any help is appreciated.

  Thank you.

  Luisi says:

  Thank you very much, your answers are very useful for me. I understand that the state machine is the best method to carry out the proposed work. But I have a problem, if I decided to do it in two different VI is for space issues. I think that I can't do that in one Vi. Is it possible to have two sides of a same Vi?

  I will attach two pictures of front panels of the screws so that you can understand my problem.

  In this first image, I have attached the face before of the Vi that supports the configuration of instruments. The table is the values of the configurations, and each line is an iteration. As you can see the number of lines can be configured (sorry is in Spanish in the picture), which means that the space can be bigger than that.

  As you can see, I need two different screws to make this automazation. I've read tutorials on the state machine and I also looked at the model that is very useful and understandable. However, I don't see that this method can be used in a communication between two different screws. Certainly, I'm very confused and now I don't know that I have to do.

  Sorry because the first question is how to pause the execution of a program (idle state) and now I'm adding these issues and the need for the two different voluntary initiatives.

  Thank you for your attention! If you have an idea, I will be very happy that you help me.

  There are several solutions for this. If you have a main executable (state machine), it may appear in the settings (your first picture) window and sends the settings as an output (or make adjustments to the main state machine and hide while the other is running). The main VI appears the window of measurement that uses the input parameters. Once the measurement is done, you save the file and return to the settings.

  As a note, you will probably need a lot more than 3 VI, to get a good program structured and modular, I'm guessing 50, fortunately it's simple to do.

  /Y

• VI does not work properly when run at each full speed or highlight the run mode, but running at full speed after the starting and stopping of the execution mode games

  Start labview, so fix that will probably teach me a lot. Looked and saw a lot of posts of things only work in games of the run mode, but nothing like this. I have attached the relevant real-time and FPGA VI.

  The code is supposed to read a motor encoder. When ran regularly, it works somehow. It will update the counter of how sporadic all few seconds a fraction of a second. When ran in climax run mode, it appears really up-to-date. After that matches the execution mode is canceled, it works perfectly. Can someone find out what could be the problem?

  Ended up staring at me. I am sure that the problem was that if there is only one element in the FIFO when it checks first, it eliminates the two elements when the FIFO filled.

  Fixed it by adding a test for the number of items before and reading only if there are enough items to read. Attached file sets for reference.

  I have still no idea why he was running after delivery to highlight in the first place. We will never know. Bonus points for the answer = P

• How to measure the execution time of a specific to a VI process?

  Hello! My VI has two processes: compression and edge detection image and I'm trying to measure the execution time for the process of detection of edge of my VI, but I don't know how to do. Please give me some ideas on how to do it. Thank you!

  There are several ways that you can do.

  -L' one is using the number of cycles before and after your vi to get time like here: http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/6F6B9F4E149C80578625652800784764

  - or use the profiling: https://zone.ni.com/reference/en-XX/help/371361H-01/lvhowto/profiling_vis/

  Edit: If you're open to suggestions:

  -You have not to load the image inside the loop instead, make him outside of the loop.

  - And I see of many IMAQ buffers are not removed properly. You can have everything at once by Images (No) by logging in to Boolean TRUE: http://zone.ni.com/reference/en-XX/help/370281P-01/imaqvision/imaq_dispose/

• Unable to modify a VI after the execution of TestStand sequence

  If I open a VI after the execution of my order, it cannot be edited. I assume that it is loaded in memory and ready to be run again. What should I do? Normally, I close LabVIEW and open it again. There must be an easier way.

  Thank you

  CT

  File-> unload all Modules

• Wait for the execution of all the

  Hello

  I have a simple question about the option "wait for complete execution" using new:

  the appellant until AFTER the execution of the cleaning or just after the main sequence?

  concerning

  At the end of the cleaning to the tag.

  Hope this helps,

• The execution of the sequence TestStand in LabVIEW via TS - API: execution different times for the same sequence

  Hello - the members of the Forum.

  I have a problem about the execution of a TestStand sequence into LabVIEW. I created a VI that offers the possibility to choose a sequence TestStand-file and then executes the sequence using the TestStand API. The implementation is based on an example in C++-Application found the following link:

  http://forums.NI.com/T5/NI-TestStand/unreleased-references-using-engine-API-in-C/m-p/2927314#M46034

  The app works pretty solid where the VI is executed the first time. The VI treats the sequence chosen in an acceptable time.

  But where execution is started again, the sequence takes approx. 30 sec more than in the first case.

  So far I have not found a solution and hope someones got a clue about this problem...

  I use 2013 LabVIEW and TestStand 2013.

  I enclose my own VI, a sequence of the specimen with a small sample of VI, so you can reproduce the problem.

  Kind regards

  TobiKi

  
  

• How to calculate the execution time of a loop?

  Hello

  Can someone guide me that how to calculate the execution time of a loop to iterate?

  Thank you and best regards,

  Rashid

  I hope I have your question! See attached screenshot

• change the execution target

  I was using Labview 7.1, where under Operate in the main menu there is an option to change the execution target, once the upgrade to 8.6, this option is not available any longer under Operate.

  so switch the execution target works differently in 8.6?

  Thank you.

  In the Project Explorer, click your Fieldpoint target and choose Disconnect.  The VI will continue on the Fieldpoint device, but the front stops turning and you shut up then.

• How to lock "Write to file measure VI" during the execution of the request for this file cannot be opened during execution.

  Hello

  I have an application where I am external hardware data acquisition and save it in a file using "Write to measure file VI.

  During the application run on time; When the user opens ".» LVM text file "; abendons-saving application of the data obtained in the prescribed file but continues to demand on external hardware data acquisition. When I stop the application; an error message is poped indicating that an error has occurred due to open running.

  My question is: How can I block this file in which the data is saved, so that the user cannot open it during the execution of the application?

  Looking forward for your kind suggestions in this regard.

  Kind regards

  Jamal

  Hi Jamal,.

  It has been said many times before: use simple simple file features!

  

  Opening a file with a default access "read/write" will disable access to this file to other programs!