PE 9 - no possible preset saving for the web...

Similar Questions

• How to get a GIF to loop PE11 with MAC 10.6.8? 480 x 320 x 72 pix/in. layers saved for the web, see animate, listen to excerpts times very well but the saved file is not

  can't understand why the gif file loop. Implemented 480x320pixels of photo frames 5 x 72pix / in in PE11, creating a layer for each. Each visible layer. Registered for the web. Checked to animate. The preview plays very well. But when I save the file and then click on the saved file to play, he re - opens the layers instead of playing the loop. The only registration option that appears is "IMAGES ONLY".

  Using photoshop elements on MAC 10.6.8 11. Either I'll put this in wrong place or is there a hidden setting I need to change?

  It you open in a web browser? That's where he plays, not in PSE, overview, or on your desktop.

• size of files when saving for the web

  'Save for web' sometimes export icon to very small size with size huge file (500Ko), when I take the same image and re - record using "Save for web", I get the small file (1 or 2 KB)

  Why does this happen?

  This happens because Photoshop is save the metadata in your PSD and JPG files. You can see that from Photoshop in file Info under the file menu, and then on the tab of raw data you will be able to see usually several lines of metadata information, sometimes thousands, and if you did a lot of manipulations on the file that can add literally MBs to the size of the file. Save for the Web and export as you can delete metadata. Personally, I find it a nuisance more than a useful feature tends to remove metadata from Lightroom, there is a plugin that allows you to select what you want to keep and what to throw away.

  Hope that helps

  Terri

• Warning of truncation of file name when saving for the Web (browsers for the Macintosh?) (CS2)

  Image (line drawing). Save for Web (* gif). Receive after WARNING:

  "Some names of the files being recorded will be truncated to 31 characters for compatibility with Macintosh browsers. To change your file name compatibility options, click on the optimization pop-up menu, choose the output settings and select saving files. »

  I couldn't find the optimization pop-up menu. Therefore, I did not this step.

  After register, I simply went to the folder appropriate and changed the file name to what I originally wanted (i.e., mainly correcting truncation).

  Big problem or not? Everything will be OK?

  Thanks in advance. A novice.

  K. Glenn Cole, President

  Wilmot Company, Inc.

  Probably safely, you can disable this Macintosh compatibility setting now.

  It's a little difficult to find these parameters...  Here's how.

  First of all, in the save for Web dialog box, tap the small icon at the top right and choose Edit output settings.

  

  Change the files record selector, and then look for the settings you want to change as shown here:

  

  I captured the foregoing PS cs6, but I think they are much the same.

  -Christmas

• Saving for the WEB in Adobe Illustrator

  Nice day!

  When I save for web or export image on the web he has quality problems. Please note attashed photo. I had the problem.

  This happens in all formats such as jpeg, gif or png. When I save as gif there are fewer of these things but still, they are not supposed to be.

  Could you please help me to solve this problem.

  Thank you.

  

  Facebook him convert to JPEG format, introducing artifacts. There isn't really anything you can do about it.

• Saving for the web. recording original, not optimized?

  I am trying to save a gif file. But if I save optimized, it makes the colors go weird. I want to just save the original, but photoshop isn't giving me this option! So, how can I do?

  Check the color reduction algorithm that you use, it is restrictive? as limiting colors Web safe only and probably change the colors a bit

  http://help.Adobe.com/en_US/Photoshop/11.0/WSE07483CE-5D9F-4764-AA48-9DF708AD8479.html

  You can manually change the color table using the pipette (this is optional, but it helps) to select the color you want to change, and then double-click it in the color table section

  http://help.Adobe.com/en_US/Photoshop/11.0/WS37DC6500-0F62-4887-9D33-761AB130FF7D.html

• Illustrator CS4 - when I save it for the web my vectors are pixelated. Help!

  I've recently updated to CS4 (I know, I'm always late), but since when I "save for web" my vectors appear pixelated. It seems worse when I want a transparent background. My pictures are for the web and it won't.

  I have read a lot about this and can't seem to fix my problem, but here is what I tried: anti-aliasing is checked, view > preview raster, view > preview overprinting, the object > pixelation and probably a few other things. If anyone can help me with this problem it would be GREATLY appreciated! I have attached a picture so you can see what I mean. I created this schematic in Illustrator CS4 and saved for the web with a transparent background and, as you can see, it seems pixelated everywhere.

  

  jskopinsky,

  It shouldn't look like this as a GIF, but what happens if you save it as PNG24?

• Note: The settings for this page are automatically saved in the Web browser cookies.

  I have a printer of C311a e-all-in-one HP Photosmart 7510.  When you look at the section of customizing built-in browser page printers, at the bottom of the installation of the list can be found this message:

  Note: The settings for this page are automatically saved in the Web browser cookies. If the Web browser cookies are deleted, these settings are lost.

  I would like to the file name for this cookie and can then ensure that this cookie is excluded from cleaning in the various tools that I could use for basic maintenance.  Thank you.

  I suspect that you gave me perfectly fine information.  However, given that this cookie file is not on my machine, determine why would come next.

  In fact, given the costs associated with this effort, profit generated over the lost time and possible third party website access to this particular cookie. all dictate that I have overcome this effort - for now.  I don't respect the time you have invested in answering my question, placing me in your debt in at least a couple of beers.  I want to thank you for the information provided.

  Mark

• Hello! I ve a problem with the complete abo... How can I activate illustrator after regulation time? the complete abo is already saved for the last month...

  Hello! I ve a problem with the complete abo... How can I activate illustrator after regulation time? the complete abo is already saved for the last month...

  [Duplicate message deleted... post the same question more than once is confusing... MOD]

  [This is an open forum, not a direct line to Adobe support... you have to wait a response]

  Hello

  Please see: -.

  https://helpx.Adobe.com/manage-account-membership/CC-reverts-to-trial.html

• Possible security for the Web-based Configuration

  My colleagues and I found something very interesting today... Despite having configured the FTP security settings (which have been confirmed to set up and in funcitoning. I can't open an FTP session to our remote target without specifying a username admin and the password) If you open the configuration tool based OR web in a browser, you can send via FTP to and from the target using the file remote browser without being connected to all! Everyone knows this?

  Apparently, these permissions are separate from FTP, but you can define these special permissions on the page of the security configuration for the web-based configuration utility.

• Is it necessary to 'save images for the web' before importing in Muse?

  Could someone give me some advice: resolution of the image please? I'm sure Adobe Tutorials said that Muse automatically resizes the images when they are imported, but on the training course Lynda.com Muse James Fritz recommend saving to the web before you import. Is this really necessary?

  I'll end up using hundreds of images, for the most part quite high level of 2 and 15 MB jpegs and it would save a lot of time if I could count on Muse to resize. But I guess the more images you use, it is more important to properly size...? !

  Also, Muse crashed tonight, and when I have opened my site he told me that all the 500 - odd links had an active lack - no doubt they all have come loose somehow during the crash. This is not really a big problem because I using just any old images in the design of the site and insert the most appropriate when it is presented. But of course, it's a little disturbing to think that all real links could be broken in the future. Is it possible to recover, rather than everyone restore manually? (And once you have downloaded from the site, you still have to have the assets and the original links? What happens if a computer fails or is stolen, for example?)

  Either way, I sought an answer to the problem of resolution on this site and thought I'd found on the Muse Jam Session: round trip and optimization of content. But this is the only video on the events page that does not have a link Watch Now! If someone could add an or point me in the right direction please it would be greatly appreciated.

  
  

  Hello

  Sorry for the late reply. Muse will be re-rasterize and optimize images you resize, crop, rotate or add effects. Otherwise they are passed through and the original image will be used. If you use very large images, but need not necessarily very good quality, I would recommend to optimize these images in something like Photoshop using "save for Web". Also, more pictures the slower your sites Web load, of course.

  You remember what you were doing before Muse crashed? Where the images that you had linked moved? You can re-edit them by double-clicking on an asset in the active panel and choose repeat the link. If all the images are in the same folder, Muse should attempt to recreate a link to all the pictures he can find.

  Having missing links in the file .muse will have no effect on your export, as they are integrated into the .muse himself file. After downloading, all necessary assets will be on your host.

  There is a video called "Optimize your images" at http://tv.adobe.com/show/muse-feature-tour/ that can help you.

  Thank you

  Colby

• What is the disadvantage of savings WITHOUT color profile for the web?

  I have discussed this issue in another thread and a clear argument against saving jpg files * without * a color profile must be performed.

  I'm very annoyed with how much more red and saturated, all my jpg files appear in IE (which does not read the sRGB embedded profile) compared to FF (which is the case).

  I tried to save the image even with the inclusion of unchecked color profile, and of course, IE and FF are showing the same image.

  It seems to me that including color profiles with jpg are just an invitation for different browsers interpret the image differently.

  Why not just save them all, WITHOUT color profiles?

  The downside to this, what exactly?

  mjyeager wrote:

  Emil, please do not confuse what follows for stubbornness...

  No worries, I never had such thoughts

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... IE does not read color profiles. The fact of FF. ERGO, in situations where a color profile is involved, the JPG will be different in each browser.

  True, without color managed programs and management the colors may not display an image in the same way. Except in the situation where the color profile describing the color of the image or the color values of an image without a color profile, by an extraordinary chance match the display capabilities of color of the device used by the program managed without colors.

  One of the problems that the addresses of color management is that all monitors will display the same color differently. Color management will make colors appear the same or as close as possible.

  A color managed program will send the RGB values of the color of the video card corrected to compensate for the differences between how your monitor displays color values and how they are perceived.

  For example, to help my Monitor wide gamut, when I create an image in Photoshop, with a red color pure R = 255, G = 0 and B = 0 and then do a screen capture, I can check how Photoshop sends these values to the video card. The result is R = 222, G = 65, B = 0 when I'm simulating an ideal sRGB display. So I can see how my colors appear on the screens of ideal sRGB. However, in reality, it is very likely to have a monitor displaying space sRGB color ideal without a color management, so to complete the color management chain, the other monitors that display my image must also have the appropriate color management to compensate for the differences in screen and display correctly RGB numbers representing the color that I see on my screen.

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... However, if the JPG has no color profile, image shows exactly the same way in both browsers...

  Who will most likely be a bad smell, which means not repoducing the expected color which is always the case with the browsers managed without colors.

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... Now, let's say this image - which looks the same in both browsers - is too hot. I can load it in Photoshop, change its hue and re-save is more what I'm looking for. The resulting image will then out - in the two browsers identically - the way I want to...

  Yes, the image will be the same in both browsers on your and any other monitor but the colors that you create (edit) will examine the way which only see you them on your monitor.

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... Now, what I think you are trying to do, is that I have no control on what are the conditions of viewing on the OTHER end (i.e., visitors to the site). They could range wide monitors, cheaper monitors, running MAC or PC, etc...

  I don't remember talking about this earlier, but yes, it's true.

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... It's true. I have no control over that. However, how including the color profile sRGB with the JPG would give me more control over these things I would not include? Unless you had to tell me that browsers arbitrarily apply a random color profile when in the absence of one, I am simply not understand how including the color with the JPG profile performs one another act that ensure that the picture is completely different in FF it does in Internet Explorer.

  You who are absolutely wrong. Color management is not to have any control over how other devices are setup, calibrated, etc.. As I said earlier make sure you communicate the colors scheduled correctly or as close as possible, as long as you and the destination use the proper color management. This means that the embedded profile FF will display correctly the planned colors while IE will not. If you do not include a color profile with your image both FF and IE will not display correctly the planned colors but they will be equal in that.

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... I understand the need for color profiles to print. In fact, my printer insists on the details when it comes to color profiles.

  But for the web? I'm still not understand where the downside is to omit the color profile. It's not like the browsers get CONFUSED when it is not included. Or that the colors will start randomly from refreshing one page to another.

  I am really trying to understand what you are saying here, but still haven't.

  In addition to what Marian said:

  If you create the colors using an sRGB display ideal (given the color management on your system works properly, it can be simulated by color of Photoshop on your range management widescreen when you assign the profile sRGB color to the image) and then on any ideal sRGB display, it will look the same you see on your screen regardless if it's with or without embedded sRGB color profile. However, in reality, it is unlikely to have a monitor, sRGB, display of the ideal space of sRGB color without color management. Now what does this mean in practice? Assume that users interested in, using the IE managed without colors on a PC with the Windows default color management. In other words, color management programs are told by the system monitor displays the ideal sRGB space, which is very likely to be the truth. Then users with this configuration with sRGB monitors will not see a difference between IE and FF when viewing your image with or without sRGB profile, the colors are not very likely to be the same that you see on the screen, but with the difference that is more likely to be accepted depending on how close to the ideal color space sRGB these monitors are. If some of these users with this configuration have wide range monitors, then the image will always be the same with or without sRGB profile, but with a very unacceptable difference of how you see it on your space to sRGB sumulated - strongly supersaturated.

  For users that have the color correctly managed systems, when the image is saved with a sRGB profile, it appears color managed programs such as FF the same or as close as possible to the way in which you can see on your monitor. Programs run without colors the case remains the same as that described above.

  A little history on how standard sRGB was created. It is a standard, including more things, but above all defining an abstract color space. It was created sometime after that the market was already flooded with computer monitors, and the creation of ideal sRGB color space was based on an average PC monitor display capabilities over time. After that the manufacturers used this standard sRGB as a target to create monitors.

  UN-color of programs run on PC have been created and tested using sRGB monitors so that they can't be considered reliable for showing intended to display colors if the images they use have been created using an sRGB they will be in the stadium of this range of sRGB.

• What is the best export for the web?

  What is considered the best export from Adobe Illustrator CC 2015 for the web these days? I know that PNG has the color a bit better than JPEG files. How about SVG?

  What is your recommendation?

  Thank you

  For modern websites of today, vectors are now better saved in SVG. As long as you use the last CC 2015, use file > export to create the SVG (which is newer than the file > save under). It will yield a smaller SVG files.

  Better, photos are saved in JPEG format.

  PNG are not "keep color" better. The JPEG and PNG24 support millions of colors, but a JPEG will be able to compress photographic details better, if you end up with a file of faster loading.

  For HTML Email SVG is not appropriate, so I use PNG or GIF instead (whichever is smaller) to the line drawings in general I want to save it as SVG.

• save multiple files for the web in JPEG max at a resolution of 800%

  I had more than 200 created illustrator files. They all have the same dimensions. I wanted an adobe illustrator script that saves all files for the web in jpeg.

  Export options must be max.resolution of all files should be increased to 800%.

  I think it's the reasoning

  Open a folder with all the files

  loop through each file

  Save for web each in jpeg format to the quality of resolution and up to 800%

  the names of all jpeg files should be the same from these illustrator files (if possible)

  I will be very thankful to you if you could help me

  Best regards,

  Hassan Ali

  As far as I understand your request it is also possible with a simple action in batch mode.

• Buy a Myriad Pro font for the web?

  Hello

  
  

  I would buy the Myriad font for the web (embed this font on my site legally).

  
  

  Is this possible?

  Thank you

  Please check Myriad Pro | Typekit

  http://www.Adobe.com/products/type/creative-cloud-fonts.html

  Concerning

  Stéphane