performance issue: break apart or simple model?

Similar Questions

• Break apart letters, distributed layer not in order (from top to bottom)

  Hello!

  I'm starting to learn how to use Flash.  I am trying to break apart a simple exercise of creating text, then distribute objects to layers.

  When I do that, layers in the timeline box appeared not in order, instead of up and down, the letters appeared low to the top of the page (see attached photo).

  Someone knows how to fix this problem, so that they appear in the order?

  Thank you!

  

  Drag and drop layers.

• DPS - simple edition - PDF rendering, text of multi-State performance issues

  Hello

  

  Please advise on the question above...

  On a retina display ipad, I have problems with States multiple objects that contain text. The left column is a clear text, object not multi-state. However when I place the text in a multi (right) state object it is not rendered in high resolution. A bit pixelated.

  One question - Cloud Creative License

  iPad Version original Gen III retina

  My application is compiled using the version of the app: v24

  I also experienced performance issues of the use of the PDF manual... When you edit a page, everything is super grainy and then ~ 2 seconds later it makes crisp. It used to be made in advance, or much faster. Maybe I was using PNG? I went in mode like PDF than recommended in countless articles. Is that the slow makes just an induced effect of PDF? What can I do to optimize? Recommendations?

  Thank you very much!

  Richie

  You must select PDF as the format and optionally vector in the slide show of the Group Folio overlays pane.

  And Yes, the delay in rendering is something you have to live with for now.

  Bob

• Performance issues when coming out of sleep

  I recently built a gaming PC. On Christmas day, I finished putting the thing together. It has an Intel i7-4790 CPU running Intel HD Graphics, 8 GB of Corsair Vengeance RAM, an Asus Z97 - A Mobo and a 2 terabyte Seagate HDD. I installed Windows and put everything in place. Then a week later, my MSI GTX 970 arrived in the mail.

  So, I take the thing to sleep and decreases the performance of the whole thing. Videos YouTube stutter, simple as games fight of World of Tanks to run at its usual rate of 60 fps. To avoid this, I simply restart my comp and then it works fine. performance is back to normal.

  A few weeks, Windows gave me a message on one of the Nvidia drivers causing performance issues when you wake up from sleep. I don't think a lot of it and rejected it. I'll try to reinstall all my Nvidia drivers. I uninstall the Intel HD graphics driver a few days ago and has not changed anything. I would appreciate an answer to this problem because I would like to continue to use the "sleep mode" because it consumes less energy and prolongs the life of my case of LED. Thank you!

  In order to diagnose your problem, we need run Windows performance toolkit, the instructions that are in this wiki

  If you have any questions do not hesitate to ask

  
  

  Please run the trace when you encounter the problem

• Performance issues with large number of nodes

  I am creating an application to display graphics (large), for example:

  

  But I ran into some performance issues, even for a relatively small number of nodes in the scene graph (+-2000 in the picture above). The graph is built, step by step, adding circles and paths to a StackPane. Circles and paths can be semi-transparant. For a small number of nodes, I get a solid 60 FPS, but this decreases over time to about 5 frames per second. As soon as I stop adding new nodes, the framerate shoot again up to 60 images per second. The framerate drop even when all the nodes are outside the viewport.

  My questions are:

  * Is Platform.runLater () call to 2000 times a minute too?

  * This might just be a problem with my graphics card? (I have an Intel HD Graphics 3000)
  * JavaFX pulse recorder says such things, are there meaningful information in that I'm missing?

  PULSE: 1287 [163MS:321MS]

  T14 (0 + 0ms): col of CSS

  T14 (0 + 5ms): layout pass

  T14 (6 + 152ms): waiting for the minutes of the previous

  T14 (158 + 0ms): copy the State for graphic rendering

  T12 (159 + 0ms): dirty opts calculated

  T12: Path of the slow form for null

  T12 (159 + 160ms): painted

  T12 (319 + 2ms): Presentable.present

  T12 (321 + 0ms): completed the presentation of painter

  Counters:

  Background image of the region used cached: 14

  NGRegion renderBackgroundShape slow path: 1

  Nodes displayed: 1839

  Nodes visited during rendering: 1840

  Kind regards

  Yuri
  

  Basically, try some optimization of performance ranging from the simple to the complex.   Each of the changes below may provide you with an increase in performance.  Some will probably increase performance much more that others (depending on where is the real bottleneck).  I would probably start by replace the paths to the lines and reduce the number of Platform.runLater calls (as adding nodes that fall within the viewport can be difficult only).

  > The framerate drop even when all the nodes are outside the viewport.

  Place the nodes in the graph, which fall inside the viewport.

  > Is Platform.runLater () call to 2000 times a minute too?

  Yes, there is no reason to call it more than 60 times a minute when the framerate of JavaFX is capped at 60 frames per second by default.

  > This might just be a problem with my graphics card? (I have an Intel HD Graphics 3000)

  Yes, it's a graphics system relatively low-end.  But, look at the comment of developer below - your CPU and choice of graphic primitives can also affect rendering speed.

  > Adding circles and the paths to a StackPane

  You don't need a StackPane to this, a group is a container easier and probably better.

  > may be semi-transparant

  Remove transparency * may * cause acceleration.

  ----

  You run may be:

  https://JavaFX-JIRA.Kenai.com/browse/RT-20405 : improve the rendering of path performance

  Maybe if you use lines rather than the paths, performance might improve.

  A comment by a developer on this performance tweak application is:

  «It is quite normal for applications that use arbitrary paths (if the node path objects, SVGPath, polyline, or polygon) because these paths are rendered in software.» As card circle, Ellipse, line and Rectangle very primitive forms easily to the operations that can be performed entirely on the GPU, which makes them essentially cheap. There is no need to compare the rendering of a complicated shape for rendering of simple primitives for this reason. »

  ----

  Setting the cache indicators can help, but probably only if you animate nodes.

  ----

  Present level of detail of your graph functionality so a chart with zoom out is not make as many nodes as a part of zoomed in.

  ----

  You run any code important calculation on the JavaFX application thread that could stall it?

  Can make you available a ftom so that others can reproduce your problems?

• Is there a performance issue associated with SPARQL property path?

  Is there a performance issue associated with SPARQL property path?

  When we use paths property is our SPARQL queries, the queries never ends. I have a general problem, or do you have a problem with Jena and jena adapter version?

  We run Oracle 12 c. The Jena adapter has version 12.1.0.1.

  Thank you

  By Oyvind

  None of these requests ends. We have 300000 tuples in the model.

  SELECT subclass, superClass

  TABLE (SEM_MATCH)

  "SELECT? subclass? superclass WHERE {? rdfs:subClassOf + subclass? superclass} LIMIT 10'.

  SEM_Models ('isall1_x'),

  NULL, null, null, null,

  (= T, timeout = 100, qid = 123, STRICT_DEFAULT = F'));

  SELECT subclass, superClass

  TABLE (SEM_MATCH)

  "SELECT? subclass? superclass WHERE {graph? g {? subclass rdfs:subClassOf +? superclass}} LIMIT 10'.

  SEM_Models ('isall1_x'),

  NULL, null, null, null,

  (= T, timeout = 100, qid = 123, STRICT_DEFAULT = F'));

• OPA webservice performance issues

  Hi all
  
  We are experiencing some performance issues with the service call a takeover of modules. The service is called via a regular Web service (XML) and we analyzed (using a clean SOAP UI call) the OPA response time is 1.5-2 seconds.
  
  As the modules is not very big (below I provide you with project statistics), I am surprised by the amount of time it takes OPA to return. Anyone know what could possibly cause this problem?
  
  Best regards, Els
  
  
  
  Project statistics
  
  Build the model
  
  Number of attributes: 242
  Number of attributes at the basic level: 26
  Number of top level attributes: 39
  Number of entities: 7
  Number of rules: 234
  Number of screens: 8
  Number of witnesses: 9
  
  Project files
  
  Word documents: 16
  Excel documents: 0
  Records of the screen: 1
  Source files: 1
  Test script files: 11
  The Visual Explorer files: 2
  Excluded files of generation: 0
  Other files: 0
  -----
  Project files total: 31

  Hi, Els,

  The amount of data you pass in to OPA (i.e. What is the XML)? I saw some performance issues with web service calls big (such as those involving thousands of entity instances), and I understand the bottleneck in these situations the time it takes to parse the XML. (The engine of the OPA itself is extremely fast).

  Of course, there are many variables to consider in all environments. Without doubt you and your team will have to do some testing to eliminate assumptions until you find the root cause.

  M

• Performance issue with the submodels

  Hello
  I'm working on submodels and my requirement needs only one main calling location several specific submodels (a location may have several own submodels, e.g.: US_subtemp1, US_subtemp2, US_subtemp3... in the same way to other locations).
  I would like to know is there any performance issue associated with calls in the submodels and on how this decrease in performance can be minimized.
  
  Kind regards
  Arvind

  Use of the submodels with components imported alongside repeated sections in the main template layout is not recommended when the number of repetitions is high and the size of the document is large. BI Publisher optimize the xsl transformation internally, but it is not applied to xsl inside models of void.
  One of the extreme scenario is a main model set only a repeating section that matter a submodel of the header and the footer.
  A body of the repeating section is defined in the subtemplate. In this scenario, there is no xsl optimization made and you can easily see some differences in performance.

  As long as you don't need to repeat the layouts of submodels, you don't need to worry about this performance issue.

  Thank you
  Shinji

• Performance issues when you build a large crossroads

  Hello
  
  I have a performance issues when you build a large crossroads.
  
  So here's my situation:
  
  We use Discoverer Plus 10.1.2.45.46c
  Database Oracle 9.2.0.6 on Windows 2003
  OAS 10.1.0.3
  1.5 GB of RAM on my PC
  
  -J' planned a workbook with 1 single worksheet that takes 2 minutes to run. The table generated in the database to store the results from 19 columns and rows to about 225000 (I know that's a lot, but it is what the customer needs).
  
  -When I opened the workbook, it takes about 2 hours to recover the data. The data is retrieved in groups of 1000 and at the beginning, the lines are read much faster than at the end. There are also 15 minutes more to build the crosstab. So overall, it takes 2 hours and 15 minutes for the crosstab display on my screen.
  
  Can someone explain to me:
  -Why does take so long?
  -What can I do to improve the execution other than changing the application or displaying the results in a regular tab? Is there some setting that I can do on the database of the Oracle Application Server?
  
  Note: I have reproduced the worksheet in a simple tab and demand it. The table generated in the DB to store the results is the same and it takes only 2-3 minutes to open this spreadsheet and extract all lines.
  
  
  Thank you!
  
  Mary

  Hi Mary
  If you have 225 000 lines in your basic spreadsheet, then it will take a lot of time to produce a crosstab. The reason is that Finder can not calculate how many buckets he needs until he has read all the data. I can almost guarantee that with 225 000 lines to read and manipulate that you are short of memory.

  You might be better suited someone create and populate a table with the results you need rather than try to get the discoverer to calculate values in crosstab on the fly. If the final result of the crosstab is a few lines of aggregated data, then this is what is right for your table. The advantage of using a table and a few SQL (or PL/SQL) is that you will not be using your local computer during the aggregation / sorting phase. Don't forget a crosstab also sort based on the values in the left columns, the columns you have aggregations (buckets) you will have and most necessary sort. Using a table, you can index or even partition the results that will make for a much faster recovery.

  As a tip, recommend Oracle, confirmed by myself during the exhaustive tests, no do not build large paintings to double entry due to the performance of touch that you will have. The tables are much more efficient because you can pull back x lines at once. You can't do that with a crosstab and all values must be read before that whatever it is is displayed.

  Does that help?
  Concerning
  Michael

• HP Elitebook 8570p - Windows XP USB very slow and the transfer rate performance issues.

  Hello. I was wondering if anyone else knows some performance issues with the HP Elitebook 8570p and Windows XP Pro - SP3.

  I get a VERY slow start, general poor performance (waiting time when opening files and programs).

  I asked to burn in tests that show that everything is good.

  USB transfer rates are VERY slow (tried all ports of a Seagate FreeAgent USB drive, which works fine on other laptops etc.) for example a 30-minute transfer a 7gig single file of the USB HD on the desktop. Only 3 minutes to do the same on another laptop.

  I think there are problems with the drivers, like Windows 7 works very well and does boot from a bootable USB.

  USB transfer rate are also good when starting from a Windows boot environment.

  I installed HP SoftPaq Download Manager, and all the drivers are up to date.

  Hello:

  I think outside of the box here... Select the Intel (r) 7 Series Chipset Family SATA AHCI Controller instead.

  If it does not, I raise the white flag.

  Paul

• Smartphone blackBerry Storm performance issues (and suggestions)

  I want to start and say that I don't like my phone.  When it works (which is most of the time), it works fine.

  But there are certainly problems of software.  As a software engineer, the OS has some memory serious management problems.  This seems to cause most of the problems I'm having with the phone.  I'm running the latest Verizon S/W (v4.7.0.148).

  Problem #1:

  I am a paranoid person.  There are a lot of personal information on my phone, I have currently international calls helped that I need this feature.  So to protect me my phone is locked when it is the case or after a period of inactivity time.  It is a good practice.  Part of the draw to the fate of the Blackberry is the security that you can configure on the device (I'm not paranoid enough to allow all the protections of encryption - yet).  Problem of the storm is that it can take 1 to 5 minutes to get the phone unlocked when unholstering.  It is not an exaggeration.  As the performance of the memory gets worse, time takes more time.  If I had to make an emergency call, it could be the difference between life and death.  5 minutes is a long time to wait to call 911.  This must be corrected!

  Problem #2:

  The phone must be "reset" once a day to remember "lost."  It is just poor programming.  I don't know if this problem of BB OS or Apps I'm running, but in both cases, this isn't fair.  After the reboot if I go to the display of memory under options I could have about 3-5 MB of free memory.  After a few hours of use, this will almost always '0 '.  I installed MemoryUp Pro, which seems to have extended the period of time between the battery grips, but I still don't think we should ask all owners of BB Storm to pull there battery once a day.  The other answer I get is "do not run so many Apps.  I get all my applications when finished.  Are the only ones that I continue to turn: Blackberry Messenger, Yahoo Messenger, Google Talk and Google Maps (Latitude).  Other applications running, you can't get out (phone, browser).  I tried doesn't work is not the 'optional' tricks and performance has not really much better.

  Problem #3:

  Missed calls.  This is probably related to problems of memory above, but if the storm can be used as a phone, then I should buy something else.  Although the occurrence of this problem has gone down because I installed MemoryUp Pro and perform the reset once a day, sometimes still about 1 to 5 times.  It takes so long for the phone to 'wake up' when a call comes in (especially if it is holstered), at the time where I hit "Answer", a call has been Messaging voice or even worse, the phone doesn't ring at all.  All I get is a notification of appeal lacks the 'unknown number '.

  Problem #4:

  Battery performance could be improved.  The battery that comes with the storm has about 24 hours on 24 with the Radio and Bluetooth.  Really, this isn't a problem if you know it.  I solved the problem by buying a 2700 mAh battery for extended life of BoxWave I use when traveling.  Makes the storm bit bulky, it will give me 2-3 days of life.  I don't know how this could be improved if not

  I hope that the developers of RIM are trying to solve some of these performance issues.  Certain tasks should be a higher priority as they seem to have (like phone & Unlock).

  Sean

  Here is the link...

  http://www.BlackBerryForums.com/General-9500-series-discussion-storm/196496-latest-9530-OS-4-7-0-208...

• upgrade performance issues - see my profile

  Hello world

  I have suffered from some performance issues and would like to hear comments on my current set in place.

  USE

  I use InDesign, Photoshop and Illustrator also throughout the day.

  SETUP

  -Intel i7 - 3770K @ 3, 5 GHz

  -16 GB Crucial RAM

  -NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

  -WDC WD1000DHTZ-04N21V0 1 to 10 k RPM 64 MB cache SATA drive at 6 GB/s (internal)

  I have not yet attributed this player for something specific

  -WDC WD5000HHTZ-04N21V1 500 GB 10 k RPM 64 MB Cache SATA drive with 6 GB/s (internal)

  It's my drive disk OS, applications, files of work and scratch

  -Software: Win7, WAA CC (not this latest version, there were issues, we had to go back to the previous version).

  WEAKNESSES

  1 RAM is small, I put at level 32 GB this week.

  2. video card is pretty low, but I rarely use first so maybe ok for now?

  3 discs: do you think that improving an SSD for OS and Adobe CC?

  I look forward to your opinions. Thanks in advance!

  Thanks for the information, Mohammad,

  What would you suggest for my existing 10 k TPM?

  I am considering a 256 GB SSD for my OS and applications. But think my scratch disk 500 GB and the 1 TB for my working files.

  Your thoughts?

• Management performance issues and huge catalog

  I shoot architecture and real estate. I turn every day hundreds of frames and my current catalog becomes huge. I'm also starting to see a huge performance hit recently. Last night I just changed until 03:30 because LR would take some time as 20 seconds to perform a single task (like changing a slide or photo of the flag). A lot of time spinning beach ball. I have an external hard drive which I support to locally.

  What I was wondering is if I have everything except the most recent project files copy the disk external then keep it unplugged when I WIP edition if it would help performance issues?

  MacBook Pro (10.9.5) and LR CC running. I optimized my catalog and I also have a Cocktail for Mac running on my system to clean the memory, etc.

  Other ideas of huge catalogs management would be useful. I prefer not to make a new catalog for each customer that I shoot several each day and passing backward between catalog every day would be a pain in the thigh.

  Hi KristianWalker,

  Have you tried to increase/purge your Cache? See How to improve and accelerate the performance of Photoshop Lightroom for more ways to optimize Lightroom.

  Also what size is your catalog at the moment?

  Kind regards

  Assani

• I am trying to perform a static check on the model. When I double click the model and go to the tab control... There is nothing to select in the knowledge module. I want to use CKM here... but nothing appearing in the drop-down menu. The global KMs are no

  I am trying to perform a static check on the model. When I double click the model and go to the tab control... There is nothing to select in the knowledge module. I want to use CKM here... but nothing appearing in the drop-down menu. The global not supposed to KMs the listed here?

  Hello

  You have imported the whole CKM in modules of knowledge?

  If not, import ckm and do it.

  Kind regards

  Gangareddy.k

• Adobe Air performance issues?

  I have recently finished a huge project in Adobe Muse and I love the new sensitive design tools. However, as the project continued to develop, Muse has become increasingly slow to react and interact with the sensitive cursor was almost impossible. As someone who worked for Apple, I'd be the first person to point the finger my Mac and offer to buy a new computer, but it is a new, maxed-out MacBook Pro 15 inches. All other Adobe CC applications work without problem. When Muse was first published, as I remember, it was written on top of the Adobe AIR platform, instead of being natively written in C++. That this has something to do with performance issues that I see? If so, is there something I can do to improve performance, I see?

  Air is not basis for Muse more for a long time. Nativly revised muse was released in early 2014.

  In my view, the Muse team works actively on performance boosts, but I think that we should not expect any miracle: no other application I know not a calculate and display real-time changing dynamically and the same objects interactively from time on endless pages in response.

  In my opinion, the only way to significantly increase the speed would be gray on all goods during the move of the scrubber.