Performance of fracture problem
Attached are the log files.
We urge you to proceed with the installation of all missing patches, because it will exclude all known bugs that can cause this problem. For more information about these patches, look into the following on My Oracle Support document:
- Doc-ID 1138602.1 Overview of available patches for the embedded in Oracle E-Business Suite Oracle XML Publisher
Tags: Business Intelligence
Similar Questions
-
Performance of Bluetooth problem
I, two headphones listening separate bluetooth (Jaybird X2s and Airfix Matrix 2) this pair perfectly and work fine with my iPhone 6.
The problem is that when I connect it to my Mac, performance system - audio and video, jump tanks lag mouse, slow individual tasks, etc.
However, I see no increase in the pressure load of the CPU or memory in the activity monitor.
I see no unusual chatter in the Console, only messages I expect:
06/04/16 7:27:50.077 PM blued [26990]: device connected with the address: 44-5e-xx-xx-xx-xx and classOfDevice 0 x 240404 and handle connection 0x000b
06/04/16 7:27:50.405 PM blued [26990]: CoreAudio trigger for you to connect to bluetoothaudiod
06/04/16 7:27:52.000 PM kernel [0]: BTCoex Config setting: enable_2G:1, profile_2g:0, enable_5G:1, profile_5G:0
That said, there are messages that are apparently independent which occur when a Bluetooth audio device is connected and I'm experiencing performance degradation:
06/04/16 7:30:44.809 PM AddressBookSourceSync [27024]:-[ABPerson valueForProperty:com.apple.Messages.FontSize] - unknown property. This warning will be displayed only once by unknown property, by session.
06/04/16 7:30:44.811 PM AddressBookSourceSync [27024]:-[ABPerson valueForProperty:com.apple.Messages.FontColor] - unknown property. This warning will be displayed only once by unknown property, by session.
06/04/16 7:30:44.812 PM AddressBookSourceSync [27024]:-[ABPerson valueForProperty:com.apple.Messages.BalloonColor] - unknown property. This warning will be displayed only once by unknown property, by session.
06/04/16 7:30:44.813 PM AddressBookSourceSync [27024]:-[ABPerson valueForProperty:com.apple.Messages.FontFamily] - unknown property. This warning will be displayed only once by unknown property, by session.
06/04/16 7:30:44.813 PM AddressBookSourceSync [27024]:-[ABPerson valueForProperty:com.apple.Messages.RandomBalloonColor] - unknown property. This warning will be displayed only once by unknown property, by session.
06/04/16 7:30:44.000 PM kernel [0]: sandbox: com.apple.Addres (27025) deny (1) / private/var/run/mDNSResponder network-outgoing
06/04/16 com.apple.AddressBook.InternetAccountsBridge [27025 7:30:44.817 PM]: dnssd_clientstub ConnectToServer: connect()-> no of tests: 1
I contacted the support from Apple via Twitter and they recommended the usual Voodoo PRAM reset, but it was not effective.
Any ideas?
Now, I'm sure that this is caused by low battery on bluetooth devices to 99%.
This is a problem that does not occur on my iPhone (even with a low battery), but the loading devices seems entirely solve the problem. Audio begins to jump and performance degrades again once the battery is less than 40% on the headphones.
Well well... :-/
-
Performance of computer problem
Hi all
Last month, I found a problem with my laptop. I have a Sony Viao VPCEJ running on Windows 7, Intel Corei5 2.40 GHz.
The question that began to occur more frequently is when I'm videos buffer on the internet or listen to the audio on the internet, either live or recorded after 30 seconds or so of the listening/veiwing my computer media will start to seem his hard face... it will start to freeze and buzzing consistent in tone with the audio and then catch up but this way continues which makes the whole frustrating issue. in some cases, I'm having a problem of crash report where I have to reload the page and it will work normally again for a short period of time until the process begins again. There is no update for adobe flash player 11.8 r800 which I a little printing is where this problem arises from reading the forums and I even completely deleted all the adobe and reinstalled to see if that would solve the problem which he did for nearly 24 hours until I noticed the issue once again.
I also have this problem when you listen just my itunes on my laptop after a while...
I have Norton Anti Virus and made complete and defragmented system checks, etc. using all available options to maintain the performance of my system and no viruses have been detected.
It has gotten to the point where I have tried everything I can think off power and can only ask for all your advisor to help me solve this problem! I appreciate the help.
My apologies if I missed any operating system information that you might need to know that I'm not sure how else to find information without assistance. If the above, you believe that this cannot be a problem with flash/shockwave or adobe then please advise :)
Thank you
Hello Yaqub K,.
I was already running on Firefox and connected to my wireless router.
I tried to see if the problem has continued on Internet Explorer, which he did when viewing media.
I also tried to load in safe mode on and watch media on internet but in safe mode sound/volume is disabled since it was impossible to see if the show and the GAL/skip took place only in safe mode.
Oddly enough I always update my system when I get notification next to my bar of the time and date at the bottom of my screen from Windows Update. I did check to make sure that everything was to date a week before your answer when the problem occurred and he said everything was up to date. However one day after you sent your message to me here, I received a Windows Update notification that there are 6 available updates I performed. I dare say, but since then I have not received all previous media watch an issues and physical memory on Windows Task Manager never descended below 1200 MB. I've noticed that the media always look a problem falls to about 300 MB of free space when the media is lagging and jumps. Why he does this, I don't know.
But it seems that somehow maybe one of Windows Update has hopefully stopped my problem does not happen.
Thanks to all who offered their support and I hope that the question does not return!
-
Performance-to-many problem (using the model of the FAQ)
After reading "HOW TO: post a request for tuning SQL - model showing statement" I gathered:
I have included some general information at the bottom of the post
The following SQL statement has been identified as a bad performance. It takes ~ 160 seconds to run, but similar (indicated below first statement) SQL statements run in ~ 1 second.
SQL taking 160 seconds:
SQL in ~ 1 second or lessSELECT a.* FROM table_a a INNER JOIN table_a_b ab ON a.id = ab.media_fk WHERE ab.channel_fk IN (7, 1);
Or:... ab.channel_fk IN (7);
The purpose of the SQL is to return lines from table_a associated table_b (not in SQL) through the junction table table_a_b.... ab.channel_fk IN (6, 9, 170, 89);
The version of the database is 10.2.0.4.0
These are the parameters relevant for the optimizer:
Here is the output of the EXPLAIN PLAN of:show parameter optimizer; NAME TYPE VALUE -------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------------------------------------- optimizer_dynamic_sampling integer 2 optimizer_features_enable string 10.2.0.4 optimizer_index_caching integer 0 optimizer_index_cost_adj integer 100 optimizer_mode string ALL_ROWS optimizer_secure_view_merging boolean TRUE show parameter db_file_multi; NAME TYPE VALUE -------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------------------------------------- db_file_multiblock_read_count integer 16 show parameter db_block_size; NAME TYPE VALUE -------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------------------------------------- db_file_multiblock_read_count integer 16 select sname, pname, pval1, pval2 from sys.aux_stats$; SNAME PNAME PVAL1 PVAL2 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ ---------------------- ------------------- SYSSTATS_INFO STATUS COMPLETED SYSSTATS_INFO DSTART 07-18-2006 23:19 SYSSTATS_INFO DSTOP 07-25-2006 23:19 SYSSTATS_INFO FLAGS 0 SYSSTATS_MAIN SREADTIM 5.918 SYSSTATS_MAIN MREADTIM 7.889 SYSSTATS_MAIN CPUSPEED 1383 SYSSTATS_MAIN MBRC 8 SYSSTATS_MAIN MAXTHR 1457152 SYSSTATS_MAIN SLAVETHR -1
For reference, the EXPLAIN PLAN when usingPLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT Plan hash value: 3781163428 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1352K| 771M| | 60042 (3)| 00:05:56 | |* 1 | HASH JOIN | | 1352K| 771M| 27M| 60042 (3)| 00:05:56 | |* 2 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| SYS_IOT_TOP_316310 | 1352K| 11M| | 1816 (4)| 00:00:11 | | 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TABLE_A | 2190K| 1230M| | 32357 (4)| 00:03:12 | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id): --------------------------------------------------- 1 - access(""AB"".""MEDIA_FK""=""A"".""ID"") 2 - filter(""AB"".""CHANNEL_FK""=1 OR ""AB"".""CHANNEL_FK""=7) Note ----- - 'PLAN_TABLE' is old version
that runs in ~ 1 second is:... ab.channel_fk IN (6, 9, 170, 89);
Here is the output of SQL * Plus AUTOTRACE, including CALENDAR information:PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT Plan hash value: 794334170 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 143K| 81M| | 58982 (3)| 00:05:50 | |* 1 | HASH JOIN | | 143K| 81M| 2952K| 58982 (3)| 00:05:50 | | 2 | INLIST ITERATOR | | | | | | | |* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN| C_M_INDEX | 143K| 1262K| | 1264 (1)| 00:00:08 | | 4 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| TABLE_A | 2190K| 1230M| | 32357 (4)| 00:03:12 | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id): --------------------------------------------------- 1 - access(""AB"".""MEDIA_FK""=""A"".""ID"") 3 - access(""AB"".""CHANNEL_FK""=6 OR ""AB"".""CHANNEL_FK""=9 OR ""AB"".""CHANNEL_FK""=89 OR ""AB"".""CHANNEL_FK""=170) Note ----- - 'PLAN_TABLE' is old version
The TKPROF output for that statement looks like the following:SQL> set autotrace traceonly arraysize 100; SQL> SELECT 2 a.* 3 FROM 4 table_a a 5 INNER JOIN table_a_b ab ON a.id = ab.media_fk 6 WHERE 7 ab.channel_fk IN (7, 1); 1336148 rows selected. Execution Plan ---------------------------------------------------------- Plan hash value: 3781163428 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1352K| 771M| | 60042 (3)| 00:05:56 | |* 1 | HASH JOIN | | 1352K| 771M| 27M| 60042 (3)| 00:05:56 | |* 2 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| SYS_IOT_TOP_316310 | 1352K| 11M| | 1816 (4)| 00:00:11 | | 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TABLE_A | 2190K| 1230M| | 32357 (4)| 00:03:12 | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id): --------------------------------------------------- 1 - access("AB"."MEDIA_FK"="A"."ID") 2 - filter("AB"."CHANNEL_FK"=1 OR "AB"."CHANNEL_FK"=7) Note ----- - 'PLAN_TABLE' is old version Statistics ---------------------------------------------------------- 10586 recursive calls 0 db block gets 200457 consistent gets 408343 physical reads 0 redo size 498740848 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client 147371 bytes received via SQL*Net from client 13363 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client 49 sorts (memory) 0 sorts (disk) 1336148 rows processed
DBMS_XPLAN. Output DISPLAY_CURSOR:TKPROF: Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production on Mon Oct 1 12:23:21 2012 Copyright (c) 1982, 2007, Oracle. All rights reserved. Trace file: ..._ora_4896.trc Sort options: default ******************************************************************************** count = number of times OCI procedure was executed cpu = cpu time in seconds executing elapsed = elapsed time in seconds executing disk = number of physical reads of buffers from disk query = number of buffers gotten for consistent read current = number of buffers gotten in current mode (usually for update) rows = number of rows processed by the fetch or execute call ******************************************************************************** ALTER SYSTEM SET TIMED_STATISTICS = TRUE call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows ------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 Execute 1 0.00 0.03 0 0 0 0 Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 ------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- total 2 0.00 0.03 0 0 0 0 Misses in library cache during parse: 0 Parsing user id: 21 ******************************************************************************** SELECT a.* FROM table_a a INNER JOIN table_a_b ab ON a.id = ab.media_fk WHERE ab.channel_fk IN (7, 1) call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows ------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Parse 1 0.01 0.00 0 0 0 0 Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 Fetch 2 27.23 163.57 179906 198394 0 16 ------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- total 4 27.25 163.58 179906 198394 0 16 Misses in library cache during parse: 1 Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS Parsing user id: 21 ******************************************************************************** OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL NON-RECURSIVE STATEMENTS call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows ------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Parse 2 0.01 0.00 0 0 0 0 Execute 2 0.00 0.03 0 0 0 0 Fetch 2 27.23 163.57 179906 198394 0 16 ------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- total 6 27.25 163.62 179906 198394 0 16 Misses in library cache during parse: 1 OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL RECURSIVE STATEMENTS call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows ------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Parse 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 Execute 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 ------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- total 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 Misses in library cache during parse: 0 2 user SQL statements in session. 0 internal SQL statements in session. 2 SQL statements in session. ******************************************************************************** Trace file: ..._ora_4896.trc Trace file compatibility: 10.01.00 Sort options: default 1 session in tracefile. 2 user SQL statements in trace file. 0 internal SQL statements in trace file. 2 SQL statements in trace file. 2 unique SQL statements in trace file. 46 lines in trace file. 187 elapsed seconds in trace file.
Thank you for reading I'm waiting for suggestions to improve the performance of this statement.select * from table(dbms_xplan.display_cursor('474frsqbc1n4d', null, 'ALLSTATS LAST')); PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT SQL_ID 474frsqbc1n4d, child number 0 ------------------------------------- SELECT /*+ gather_plan_statistics */ c.* FROM table_a c INNER JOIN table_a_b ab ON c.id = ab.media_fk WHERE ab.channel_fk IN (7, 1) Plan hash value: 3781163428 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows | A-Time | Buffers | Reads | Writes | OMem | 1Mem | Used-Mem | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |* 1 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 1352K| 1050 |00:00:40.93 | 198K| 182K| 209K| 29M| 5266K| 3320K (1)| |* 2 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| SYS_IOT_TOP_316310 | 1 | 1352K| 1336K|00:00:01.34 | 10874 | 0 | 0 | | | | | 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TABLE_A | 1 | 2190K| 2267K|00:02:45.56 | 187K| 182K| 0 | | | | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id): --------------------------------------------------- 1 - access(""AB"".""MEDIA_FK""=""C"".""ID"") 2 - filter((""AB"".""CHANNEL_FK""=1 OR ""AB"".""CHANNEL_FK""=7))
-----
H3. Backgroud
There are many years my company made decided to maintain many-to-many relationships in our database using pipe delimited fields. An example of field value:
Each delimited value refers to a unique "short" code TABLE_B (there is also a real digital foreign key to TABLE_B, which is what I use in the junction table). We are regularly using these columns with the next SQL style:'|ABC|XYZ|VTR|DVD|'
Appropriate indexes have been created over the years to make this process as soon a possible.... WHERE INSTR(pipedcolumn, '|ABC|') > 0 OR INSTR(pipedcolumn, '|XYZ|' > 0 ...
We now have an opportunity to correct some of these errors of design and implementation of junction tables to replace the current field. Before that, we have decided to take a copy of a database to a client with the largest set of records and test. I created a new junction table:
And the analysis on a pipe delimited field, populated by this new table.TABLE_A_B DDL: CREATE TABLE TABLE_A_B ( media_fk NUMBER, channel_fk NUMBER, PRIMARY KEY (media_fk, channel_fk), FOREIGN KEY (media_fk) REFERENCES TABLE_A (ID), FOREIGN KEY (channel_fk) REFERENCES TABLE_B (ID) ) ORGANIZATION INDEX COMPRESS; CREATE INDEX C_M_INDEX ON TABLE_A_B (channel_fk, media_fk) COMPRESS;
I then compared the performance of the following SQL:
When x, y, n are values that occur less frequently in the TABLE_A_B.CHANNEL_FK performance are comparable. However once the frequency of x, y, n increases, performance suffers. Here is a summary of the data CHANNEL_FK in TABLE_A_B:SELECT a.* FROM table_a a INNER JOIN table_a_b ab ON a.id = ab.media_fk WHERE ab.channel_fk IN (x, y, n); -- Can be Many Minutes --vs. SELECT a.* FROM table_a a WHERE INSTR(OWNERS,'|x|') >0 OR INSTR(OWNERS,'|y|') >0 OR INSTR(OWNERS,'|n|') >0; -- About 1 second seemingly regardless
I noticed that whenever I use any combination of values that occur over approximately 800 000 times (i.e. IN (7, 1) = 780741 + 555407 = 1336148) then I get performance problems.--SQL For Summary Data SELECT channel_fk, count(channel_fk) FROM table_a_b GROUP BY channel_fk ORDER BY COUNT(channel_fk) DESC; CHANNEL_FK COUNT(CHANNEL_FK) ---------------------- ---------------------- 7 780741 1 555407 2 422493 3 189493 169 144663 9 79457 6 53051 171 28401 170 19857 49 12603 ...
I find it very difficult to accept that the old pipe delimited fields are a better solution (without taking into account any other than this search criterion!).
Thank you for reading this far. I really look forward to suggestions on how to improve the performance of this statement.
Published by: user1950227 on October 1, 2012 12:06
Table of link renamed in DDL.davebcast wrote:
The following SQL statement has been identified as a bad performance. It takes ~ 160 seconds to run, but similar (indicated below first statement) SQL statements run in ~ 1 second.
Keep in mind that the enforcement timeframe has elapsed is a poor metric to use for benchmarking of SQL. The reason is that the same workload does not mean that the same elapsed execution time.
The workload for example shows a block of 1000 readings. There will be a difference marked by this workload reading data of the slow physical disks, or making this workload by reading data from memory in memory cache. And if it happens to be in memory or on disk is a kind of "random" thing (depends on many environment and factors of execution).
Thus, rather than measure the elapsed time and use it to compare, rather compare actual workloads. A workload of 500 block reading is faster and better than a block of 1000 DSL - despite the fact that a point of elapsed time can show the 500 read being slow (e/s physical) block a block of 1000 to read (e/s logic).
-
Performance monitoring / identify problems
Is there a technique to find and identify database performance problems without accessing the database?
Thank youWell, if you are root on the server, you can connect to the database as SYSDBA using operating system authentication.
Using operating system tools could be potentially useful, but usually in addition to the information in the database, not instead of it. You can see at the level of the operating system, for example, that the machine is constantly using 95% of the available CPU for long periods of time at night so we can conclude that the current processes of charge every night are generally CPU a bottleneck. Short throw material the problem (which may or may not make things better), however, there is no way to know that the problem is that there are a few poor query plans that are causing excessive CPU consumption and no way to fix the problem.
There are a small number of issues of a bad system configuration that you can see in the level of operating system - for example, if you have 4 GB of physical RAM and the database is regularly using 8 GB of RAM and is constantly exchanging. You must Access the database (or at least the settings file) to change the database settings to use less RAM.
Justin
-
performance after decommissioning problem
Hello
Before iam using the version of the oracle 11.1 client to connect to oracle 10.1, it was working fine,
now, I spent in the client version of 11.1 to 8, now iam facing the performance of applications in oracle 10.1 connection.
What could be the reasons behind all this.
Thank you.What language do you use? Maybe a few problems of libraries?
Nicolas.
-
Performance - Captivate 2 problems
Since I installed Captivate 2, I've known severe performance on my laptop problem. A video captured with the first version of Captivate (approximately 75 slides), when opened in Captivate 2, limited my ability to changes. I can perform changes on the first 20 - or so slides... IE - resize highlight boxes, change in length of strike etc... After the slide 20' th, I can no longer make these changes. It's as if the system is at maximum. I am obliged to break the video into separate files, not more than 20 slides each to continue with the installation. At the end that I can copy and past these slides back into a single file for editing. Someone at - it experieince that? You can provide any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance for your help.I solved this problem by upgrading to the RAM on my computer. Thank you for all your help.
-
performance y40 Lenovo problem
I bought lenovo y40 ago 30/11/2014... I am not happy with that because his slow running on day 1... I tried many way to solve it but it doesn, t work I need few Suggetions as soon as possible, that I have to solve this problem.
You can try to reset the laptop which will erase all of your personal files (make a backup) and restore the system to its original configuration.
Shut down the laptop computer
Press the NOVO button next to the power button
Follow the instructions to reset to the factory settings.
Once the process is complete, recheck the system. If it is still slow, then call Lenovo in your country and request a RMA number, maybe your drive HARD or SSD or RAM is not good and is a failure.
Send it for repair.
-
There are two days that my computer has turned black. She is back but worked a few minutes and then became slow or stopped completely. Often, said pages do not respond. Can start working very well for about fifteen minutes, but back problems. Dell worked on this remote and it did not help. I was going to try to do a system restore to the day before the problem said but it says: System Restore has been locked by the administrator and I need to contact the administrator. I am the only user and administrator. I would have not locked the system restore. Anyone has any ideas that might help?
I do not recommend using all cleaner programs like that, they cause many more questions and delays them distressed.
PS. You can configure your browser for all sessions to treat confidentially, without initiating inPrivate mode. Go to the options of IE and set it as you like (such as "remove history when I go out", which means that it will always act as InPrivate. But remember that your history of ways your previously typed addresses will show never again of compensation.
-
Hello OPA Experts.
I built the OPA rules and mapping of Siebel IO for the calculation of the line item. OPA calculates the discount and upsert discount for Siebel. during the tests for the 1000 items, it took 2 minutes to run the workflow OTB "Policy of automation evaluate IO", I added steps for upsert and map data. Here are the results:
1 step 'Load IO' has 7 seconds
' 2 ' call access IO "took 1 minute 2 seconds
I use the Tomcat server in my room for tests. Why it takes so long to get the response from OPA? How can I improve the performance, I can use IO searchSpec to send only the headings meet for calculation. But the user that the process all the 1000 posts on click of a button. Please let me know if we can improve performance or it's OOTB behavior. Thank you.
What version of OPA Siebel connector are you using? There are a few significant improvements between 10.4.2 and 10.4.4 preformance.
A few things to look at:
If you do a lot of relationships presumed or inferred from the entities that may be quite slow. For example, if every line item has a possible relationship alleged among 1000 other posts which will result in 1000 x 1000 assessments for membership.
Also, if you return the records of decision, they can be vary large, especially if there is one per line.
See you soon
Frank
-
Performance and memory problem
Location:
Have a mapping in Informatica (SDE), who joins about 15 tables from the OLTP database to create the staging table. This process joins the tables such as accounts, orders, and control elements. Great process that joins with very large tables. The process has been running in about 18 minutes, a change has been made.
Change:
Added three additional tables in the join (account tables and references) to pull 5 new fields. Two of these paintings are large enough with the third being small.
Question:
Now, the process that was running in about 18 minutes is more than 8 hours to run. If I take the SQL mapping code and run it in SQL Developer, it runs less than a minute.
Possible cause:
Don't know what the problem is that suddenly caused the process to change so dramatically. One thought is that the addition of three new tables in the join can be maxing some Informatica cache in temporary memory (storage). Looking at the workflow and I noticed that the size of the buffer of DTM has been set to 36 m. Not sure if this aspect will have to be increased, or if there is another parameter that we need change. Any insight and help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you...Better find an Informatica forum with expert tool specific.
See you soon
David -
performance on hz_cust_acct_sites problem
Hi all
I am faced with the question of performance. Each row of the table AR. HZ_CUST_ACCT_SITES_ALL is reading.
joined all the primary keys as well as foreign
output:
must get the customer details in service sales representative
can anyone suggest...
This is the query.
SELECT hca.cust_account_id,
HCA.account_number,
HP.party_name,
HCA. Status,
HCAS.cust_acct_site_id,
HL. Address1. ', ' || HL.address2 | ', ' || HL. City | ', ' || HL. State | ' ' || HL.postal_code | ', ' || HL. Country concatenated_address,
DECODE ('NAME', 'NAME', hp.party_name,
"ZIP", hl.postal_code,
'STATE', hl.state,
'The CITY', hl.city,
"Address1", hl.address1,
'COUNTRY', hl.country,
HP.party_name sort_field)
OF hz_parties hp,.
hz_party_sites hps,
hz_cust_accounts AOB,
hz_cust_acct_sites AHC,
hz_locations hl,
ra_addresses one
WHERE 1 = 1
and hp.party_id = hps.party_id
AND hp.party_id = hca.party_id
AND hca.cust_account_id = hcas.cust_account_id
AND hcas.party_site_id = hps.party_site_id
AND hps.location_id = hl.location_id
AND hp.party_id = a.party_id
AND hps.party_site_id = a.party_site_id
AND (hca.primary_salesrep_id = 1040 or EXISTS (SELECT primary_salesrep_id)
OF hz_cust_site_uses
WHERE cust_acct_site_id = hcas.cust_acct_site_id
AND primary_salesrep_id = 1040))
AND hca.status = 'A '.
AND a.status like 'A '.
Thank you
Pieron.Remove this part
AND (hca.primary_salesrep_id = 1040 or EXISTS (SELECT primary_salesrep_id)
OF hz_cust_site_uses
WHERE cust_acct_site_id = hcas.cust_acct_site_id
AND primary_salesrep_id = 1040))
and try.
If he runs fast, then try to change the part above. Usually there are or slows down the application. -
Performance collection filtering problem
I'm filtering an XMLListCollection by date. The date of the Collection must be > = date today and then a list item, use it as a dataProvider will only display items with a date article > = today.
Today I came across a problem where if there is no item matching this criteria, the list opens the voids. Source of confusion. So I added a line after applying the filter to the list to check if the length of the dataProvider property == 0 after filtering. If so, I remove the filter and apply the refresh() method, and now all of the elements are. This seems terribly inefficient and makes the flicker of the list, but I can't think of a way to check the zero items before a filter is applied.
Any ideas on how I could do this effectively?Try to simply run the e4x expression which is the same as the filter and
audit of its length. Or use instead of a function coming filterFunction
with the XMLList in the first place.HTH;
Amy
"rtalton" wrote in message
News:gjavn6$7s3$1@forums. Macromedia.com...
> I'm filtering an XMLListCollection by date. At the time of the Collection
> be
> = date today and then a list item, use it as a dataProvider's
> show
> only the items with a date of the article > = today.
>
> Today I came across a problem where if no matching items in this
> criteria,.
> the empty list opens. Source of confusion. So I added a line after the list
> filter
> is applied to check if the length of the dataProvider property == 0 after
> filtering. If so, I remove the filter and apply the refresh() method, and
> now
> all items appear. This seems terribly inefficient and makes the list
> Twinkle, but I cannot think of a method of control of zero points before a
> filter is
> applied.
>
> Any ideas on how I could do this effectively?
> -
We have an ADF application uses MDS for the customization of the user interface. For each page, we see that the customization part takes 20 sec run. We helped all levels of MDS to TRACE32 newspaper. We are seeing the following message in the log files permanently. Typically for a page load, this comes many times and 7-8 logs files are shot. What does this mean and how to fix this?
[ExecuteThread: '4' for queue: "(self-adjusting) weblogic.kernel.Default"] [userId: inv] [ecid: f7a1f56f50bb5660:-a1600bc:14b9d1ee107 :-8000-0000000000000538,0] [APP: oracle.communications.inventory] [IDDM: 0000KiTH3jCAdLzLK2CCye1KtAED000007] doCache moRef=/xliffBundles/InventoryOverrideBundle.xlf MetadataObject.getBaseMO = true priorCacheAccess = null noCacheContent = null () started
[2015 02-18 T 20: 51:39.884 + 05:30] [AdminServer] [TRACK: 32] [] [oracle.mds.corecache] [tid: [ASSETS].] [[ExecuteThread: '4' for queue: "(self-adjusting) weblogic.kernel.Default"] [userId: inv] [ecid: f7a1f56f50bb5660:-a1600bc:14b9d1ee107 :-8000-0000000000000538,0] [APP: oracle.communications.inventory] [IDDM: 0000KiTH3jCAdLzLK2CCye1KtAED000007] moRef=/xliffBundles/InventoryOverrideBundle.xlf () = true priorCacheAccess = null noCacheContent = null MetadataObject.getBaseMO doCache finally release cacheAccess=CacheAccess@36d2adf0 < rootNode=RootNode@1e57a918 < Cle_principale = StoredKey < /xliffBundles/InventoryOverrideBundle.xlf:LabelSet[45-null] >, value=MetadataObject@27ff3b0[hashCode=a14346a]/xliffBundles/InventoryOverrideBundle.xlf > >
[2015 02-18 T 20: 51:39.884 + 05:30] [AdminServer] [TRACK: 32] [] [oracle.mds.corecache] [tid: [ASSETS].] [ExecuteThread: '4' for queue: "(self-adjusting) weblogic.kernel.Default"] [userId: inv] [ecid: f7a1f56f50bb5660:-a1600bc:14b9d1ee107 :-8000-0000000000000538,0] [APP: oracle.communications.inventory] [IDDM: 0000KiTH3jCAdLzLK2CCye1KtAED000007] doCache moRef=/xliffBundles/InventoryOverrideBundle_en_US.xlf MetadataObject.getBaseMO = true priorCacheAccess = null noCacheContent = null () started
[2015 02-18 T 20: 51:39.884 + 05:30] [AdminServer] [TRACK: 32] [] [oracle.mds.corecache] [tid: [ASSETS].] [ExecuteThread: '4' for queue: "(self-adjusting) weblogic.kernel.Default"] [userId: inv] [ecid: f7a1f56f50bb5660:-a1600bc:14b9d1ee107 :-8000-0000000000000538,0] [APP: oracle.communications.inventory] [IDDM: 0000KiTH3jCAdLzLK2CCye1KtAED000007] doCache moRef=/xliffBundles/InventoryOverrideBundle_en_US.xlf () MetadataObject.getBaseMO = true priorCacheAccess = noCacheContent cache null = null, cacheAccess = null
[2015 02-18 T 20: 51:39.884 + 05:30] [AdminServer] [TRACK: 32] [] [oracle.mds.corecache] [tid: [ASSETS].] [ExecuteThread: '4' for queue: "(self-adjusting) weblogic.kernel.Default"] [userId: inv] [ecid: f7a1f56f50bb5660:-a1600bc:14b9d1ee107 :-8000-0000000000000538,0] [APP: oracle.communications.inventory] [IDDM: 0000KiTH3jCAdLzLK2CCye1KtAED000007] doCache moRef=/xliffBundles/InventoryOverrideBundle_en.xlf MetadataObject.getBaseMO = true priorCacheAccess = null noCacheContent = null () started
[2015 02-18 T 20: 51:39.884 + 05:30] [AdminServer] [TRACK: 32] [] [oracle.mds.corecache] [tid: [ASSETS].] [[ExecuteThread: '4' for queue: "(self-adjusting) weblogic.kernel.Default"] [userId: inv] [ecid: f7a1f56f50bb5660:-a1600bc:14b9d1ee107 :-8000-0000000000000538,0] [APP: oracle.communications.inventory] [IDDM: 0000KiTH3jCAdLzLK2CCye1KtAED000007] moRef=/xliffBundles/InventoryOverrideBundle_en.xlf () = true priorCacheAccess = null noCacheContent = null MetadataObject.getBaseMO doCache finally release cacheAccess=CacheAccess@419983ae < rootNode=RootNode@77849f44 < Cle_principale = StoredKey < /xliffBundles/InventoryOverrideBundle_en.xlf:LabelSet[45-null] >, value=MetadataObject@3ced2e73[hashCode=e4e94926]/xliffBundles/InventoryOverrideBundle_en.xlf > >
[2015 02-18 T 20: 51:39.884 + 05:30] [AdminServer] [TRACK: 32] [] [oracle.mds.corecache] [tid: [ASSETS].] [ExecuteThread: '4' for queue: "(self-adjusting) weblogic.kernel.Default"] [userId: inv] [ecid: f7a1f56f50bb5660:-a1600bc:14b9d1ee107 :-8000-0000000000000538,0] [APP: oracle.communications.inventory] [IDDM: 0000KiTH3jCAdLzLK2CCye1KtAED000007] doCache moRef=/xliffBundles/InventoryOverrideBundle.xlf MetadataObject.getBaseMO = true priorCacheAccess = null noCacheContent = null () started
[2015 02-18 T 20: 51:39.884 + 05:30] [AdminServer] [TRACK: 32] [] [oracle.mds.corecache] [tid: [ASSETS].] [[ExecuteThread: '4' for queue: "(self-adjusting) weblogic.kernel.Default"] [userId: inv] [ecid: f7a1f56f50bb5660:-a1600bc:14b9d1ee107 :-8000-0000000000000538,0] [APP: oracle.communications.inventory] [IDDM: 0000KiTH3jCAdLzLK2CCye1KtAED000007] moRef=/xliffBundles/InventoryOverrideBundle.xlf () = true priorCacheAccess = null noCacheContent = null MetadataObject.getBaseMO doCache finally release cacheAccess=CacheAccess@45943627 < rootNode=RootNode@1e57a918 < Cle_principale = StoredKey < /xliffBundles/InventoryOverrideBundle.xlf:LabelSet[45-null] >, value=MetadataObject@27ff3b0[hashCode=a14346a]/xliffBundles/InventoryOverrideBundle.xlf > >
[2015 02-18 T
Thank you
The same is discussed in
In pages ADF Faces resource packs could cause huge locking conflicts
-
Performance once again problem
Hi all
11.2.0.1
Our application is now booming high CPU resources. from 08:00.
I got this
AWR >https://app.box.com/s/6r7vfxq54shsoihkfj3c
ADDM >https://app.box.com/s/38n1b9i3fa6pb8y2l5xh
ASH >https://app.box.com/s/cm0p9kmc10kvldzx6p1v
But I got only the sql statement that was good in the past few months.
Please help me identify the culprit again.
Thank you very much
zxy
Hi all
The culprit is, we have installed DB Vault and some configuration was messed up. Maybe the DVOWNER admin accidentally deleted some permissions?
The sql statement that worked well before suddenly bad was the reason is that vault DB reject the owner of the table to access its own index. That is why the
plan instruction SQL has been changed and the table full to analyze all the time.
In this regard, is there a way to check if all PLANS SQL in the OLD_PROD (with no Vault db), can be compared to all the SQL PLANS in our NEW_PROD (with barrel vault db)?
So that we know what changes were made?
Thank you very much
zxy
Maybe you are looking for
-
Mark the selected item in a listview
Hello experts, So, I need to show a selected list item by placing a checkmark next to him (into the cell). What a cell can be selected. So does anyone have a solution that can be shared? Or some advise how this can be done properly. I would be very g
-
How to disable the generation of intel graphics hd 4000 video on Dell Inspiron 3521?
Hello, I recently bought the Dell laptop inspiron 3521. It comes with AMD Radeon HD M 8730. But it seems that the computer is not at all. Two video cards with drivers up to date.I tried with disable the generation in the video card, but when I do the
-
BlackBerry Smartphones Re: BADLY FORMED XML?
Hi all, I have the curve 8520. All was well until today and now I also get XML NOT GOOD SHAPE is not on all the sites yet but its so boring. I also did what was Sujested here and that you still have the problem. The only thing I've done today is upda
-
Ringtones using custom. Help, please.
Hi all. I am new to this forum and Palm. A week ago I bought a Palm Pre Plus from Verizon. I have version 1.4 update installed as well. My question is this: I've set up ringtones for specific calls. I also put a song for "incoming calls" (i.e. ca
-
Can I buy Premiere Pro a month with discount for students?
I was hoping to buy Premiere Pro for one, maybe two months, and I'm still a student. However, so far I only saw the student for annual subscriptions discount. Could someone tell me what's the story?