Port forwarding to another local subnet on RV130W

Similar Questions

• WRT54G2 - port forwarding to a different local port

  Hi people,
  I just tried to set up my wireless G router to transfer a WAN calls on a specific port IP address local and ANOTHER port. Here's the scenario:

  An incoming request: port 80
  Should be rerouted to: 172.16.0.2:8585

  The only option I found is to reroute the port 8585 to 172.16.0.2:8585 which unfortunately does not work for me in this case.
  Am I missing something?
  Any help is appreciated.

  Hi, thanks for your response.

  The problem was exactly what you mentioned at the end of your post - interface (not the router mmee) linksys does not Port forwarding for the local way different.

  For those who are interested in the solution - you have to Flash your router - details and download here - www.dd-wrt.com

  I did and now I am able to transfer to a specific LAN IP: Port (+ 1000s other useful goodies).

  

• EA7500 Port Forwarding disorder

  Hello

  I'm having a problem involving using the port forwarding on my new LInksys EA7500 router.

  Everything works well, it works as it should locally, with my Apple TV, Windows desktop and all my phones.

  But as soon as I set up a port forwarding using port 32400 "plex" and the Ip address of my SIN.

  I start getting "failed to retrieve the queue of reading for this element. Please try again ".

  This problem only when I try to use the plex locally, if I use the phone, on my 4g net, everything works as it should.

  But not locally on my LAN/WLAN.

  As soon as I remove the port forwarding, it works locally again?

  Can someone please help me if there is anything I should change?

  / Fredrik

  I think I have it solved.
  I've updated the Plex media server, rebooted, and now it seems to work.
  / Fredrik

• Port Forwarding problem through 2 routers RVS4000 2 subnets

  I modified a building network to be compliant (Visa) PABP where two router and two subnets are required.

  My original CD building network configuration was designed to allow remote access to a server terminal server via the port forwarding on a RVS4000 router. So cables / modems-> xx.xx.xx.xx wan ROUTER lan 192.168.1.1--> subnet 192.168.1.0 with TCP 3389 Port forwarding for 192.168.1.11 (terminal server).

  The new configuration of the network is composed of two routers RVS4000 on two subnets. So the Modem cable-> wan xx.xx.xx.xx ROUTER1 lan 192.168.2.2-> Subnet 192.168.2.0-> DMZ 192.168.2.14 and the second router wan ROUTER2 lan--> subnet 192.168.1.0 192.168.1.1 192.168.2.1.

  ROUTER1 is configured in Bridge mode and ROUTER2 is configured in router mode. Port forwarding on ROUTER1 to port TCP 3389 is 192.168.2.1 (on ROUTER2 wan port). Port forwarding on Router 2 for the TCP 3389 must 192.168.1.11 port (server address terminal server).

  With this new configuration of network I am able to connect to the Terminal Server remotely. No problem with access to the Internet and the 192.168.2.0 subnet from inside the 192.168.1.0 subnet.

  So I think my problem is through two RVS4000 routers port forwarding. Any help on this problem will be appreciated.

  Thank you.

  1. can you access the terminal server server from inside the subnet 192.168.2.0/24 using the IP WAN to Router 2, which is access 192.168.2.1:3389 from inside 192.168.2.0/24.

  2. turn on Router 2 router in Bridge mode. Try again. My guess is that this will make the work of transfer. I think that port forwarding is linked to the NAT/gateway mode. No NAT no transfer. Is not logical to use the transfer when you are able to access the IP directly without NAT. Of course, the web interface does not allow you to forward a port located outside the LAN subnet...

  3. are you sure that you can access internet through Router 2 in router mode on the LAN subnet router 2? Usually in the NAT their own LAN subnet routers only bridge mode but not others. If the RVS4000 not NAT a different subnet that would be good to know.

• RV130W - Firewall locks? Port forwarding no longer works!

  Hey all,.

  I have a Cisco RV130W router, which seems to have problems with the Port Forwarding type stuff.  Port forwarding is without a doubt done properly (as I did on all other RV130W) and the ports actually work for a few hours or maybe more, but then it's like she goes down on the lock and blocks all traffic that passes through.

  My solution is to reboot the router for port forwarding works again.

  I can't access management "distance" more when this happens.  I can access the Web Interface via LAN and Internet and network continues to operate correctly - DHCP and all.

  I'm under the new firmware.

  Any ideas?  Thank you!

  Hello Jeff,.

  Sorry the camera does not work as expected.  I have seen this problem before and I think that you would see if you were doing a capture of packets across the Wan is the router receives a SYN, but never respond with a SYN ACK.  We have found a workaround is to, I suspect that you have single port forwarding enabled, try to configure the same ports in the range of port forwarding page.  Configure the ports of departure and end in the same port number, and remove the single port forwarding configuration.  I hope this helps.

• WRT160N V3 DMZ and Port-Forwarding does not work

  Hi all

  I have a V3 WRT160N and DMZ or Portforwarding do not work.

  I tried on locally

  WAN_PC-> WAN - PORT-> WRT160N V3-> LOCAL - PORT-> LOCAL_PC

  The WAN_PC has a static IP 192.168.1.2, subnet 255.255.255.0

  The WAN PORT has a static IP 192.168.1.1, subnet 255.255.255.0

  ON the WRT160N V3, I set up a DMZ on 192.168.0.100.and off the firewall.

  On the LOCAL_PC (192.168.0.100:8888) is an Apache

  So when I type 192.168.1.1:8888 on the WAN_PC I get NOOO the Apache on 192.168.0.100:8888 Web site?

  WHY??????????????

  Please correct me if I'm wrong. My understanding of your installation, it is that you have a computer connected to the internet port of the router and another computer connected to the router's ethernet port? Is this correct? You don't have a modem for internet connection or something like that? If you can post here a diagram that will be better. Thank you.

• Port forwarding on RV220W

  Hello

  I'll try to find a router that can do the redirection to other subnets of port. My current linksys has IP 192.168.1.1 and only allows me to move forward to 192.168.1.x, but I need to send to 2.x, 3.x, 4.x

  I can see how to do this on the RV215W through the emulator online, but Cisco has suggested that I use the RV220W. Looking into Microsoft device emulator, I can't understand how I would be put in place.

  I'm not in business, it's just to test at home.

  Hello

  It is certainly possible to do, but it may be different. What makes it worse, it's the emulator which is listed on the Web site is running the firmware more old. New firmware 1.0.1.0 beyond had changed around MISTLETOE. So even if you get used to how to do it with the emulator online, you will notice, it's still a little different in the new firmware, but not much.

  You'd have to do is to go under Firewall and go under the IPv4 firewall rules. You would then add a firewall rule declaring Wan LAN (from area to area) with your source and destination (source will usually be none) and 'send it to the local server' would be the ip you are transferring to. Under the list of service return, there will be a list of common services that you could use. If the service that you want to use does not appear, then you create what's called a personal service.

  Of course, it was just a quick run down. Port forwarding feature of this router gives you plenty of control and I would recommend to check up on the guide of the administrator for more details.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/routers/CSBR/rv220w/Administration/Guide/rv220w_ag_78-19743.PDF

  Other than that, what is your main goal? You don't yet need something flashy like the RV220w, the RV215 seems like it could do the job but seems to only go up to 4 VLANS if I remember, maybe wrong. It's probably much easier to set up at least in the RV215 well.

  I hope this helps you!

  Thank you

  Clayton Sill

• Issue from site to site of SRP527w port forwarding

  

  Hello

  I have problem with setting up port forwarding on the VPN between two cisco 527w.

  Scenario when we see a tunnel VPN from Site to Site between Site A and B; a printer behind Site B must be accessible using the IP WAN of A Site address.

  Like the picture above:

  -From site A, I am able to ping printer and printer access locally and via 120.146.x.x with port forwarding to installation on site has to the printer.

  -From site B, I am able to ping A site gateway but not able to access the printer through 120.146.x.x. The printer can be access via 129.203.x.x if port forwarding is configured on the site B on the printer.

  Cisco SRP 527w supports port forwarding via VPN site-to-site site A to site B printer?

  Y at - it no suggest or another solution for this scenario?

  Some help would be very appreciated.

  Kind regards

  Thai

  Hi thai,

  I'm not entirely sure - I think that an IOS based router, for example, the 800 series, you could do with proper setup.

  I would say that remote access to a printer or a server like this is perhaps not the most secure solution however.  A better approach would be to use a router that supports both a remote access VPN site.  With this, you must be able to use a VPN client to access the site with the IP address static, then tunnel to the other site where the device is.  You might consider the series RV of the device as well as IOS routers for that.

  Kind regards

  Andy

• RV042 & Port forwarding

  Hi all
  I connect to my ISA Server to the linksys RV042 router. the router is configured to work dualWan and not of DMZ.

  I have configured port forwarding on the router to forward all traffic on ports 80 and 443 to be forward to the IP address of the ISA. I disabled

  the firewall. but without success.

  I tried to open the http connection to ISA from a laptop computer connected on one of the LAN port of the router (port next to the port where ISA is

  connected) the test is successful.

  another test is done, I installed a Web server on your laptop (xerver.exe) application. I connected the laptop to the router linksys lan port,

  and I configured the port forwarding on ports 80 and 443 to the IP address of the laptop. I tried to connect via http/https to the ip of the router

  address of WAN but without success. which means that the problem is in the transfer of traffic from the Wan to the local on ports 80 & 443 network and not with the ISA iteslf.

  If a configuration option is still missing on the RV042 router to complete my setup.

  can you please advice.

  Thank you

  Hello

  Dual WAN or DMZ mode will not affect the firewall rules, as long as you try to access the ISA server through the IP WAN 1 address.

  You mentioned that you have disabled the firewall, you have re-enabled the firewall before you add new rules for port 80?

  If this isn't the case, please do and report your findings.

  Thank you!

  Dave

• Need help with the implementation of a VPN to bypass the port forwarding to access my web server

  Pretty much as the title suggests, but it's probably not clear enough. Let me explain:
  I want to host a Web site on my computer. Not another major, but something small and private.

  Before you set up a domain name, I want to make sure the site works - which it is not.
  I am currently using WAMPServer to organize it all.

  I put it so when I connect to localhost, I have access to all my files in the directory, regardless of whether or not I'm "online" or "offline" on WAMPServer (or not, others will have access to my Web page).

  When I turn WAMPServer 'on-line', it allows the connection of my WAMPServer homepage through both localhost and connection through the static IP address, I put in place, but only in LAN, meaning that only computers connected to my home network would have access to the page.

  My router cannot be configured to allow port forwarding for can I open a port to allow redirection to my computer, rather than the ambiguous router itself. As an alternative, I downloaded Hamachi to allow a computer to connect to the VPN (Hamachi) and, by extension, my IP for access to files in the directory.

  In theory, it should work, but it didn't. In my local network computers could still connect to the IP address, but the computer in the virtual private network, but not on the local network could not.

  Is there something I'm missing here, or is there any suggestions to make this work?

  Note:
  My works of static IP as what it is, however, it is different from the IP address used in Hamachi. If I change the IP address used by my computer to access the site to the IP address that uses my Hamachi, would that work? As another suggestion, can I change my static IP setting is automatic and change one used on WAMPServer (from localhost, allowing the connection to bring) than on Hamachi? Or I do all three IP addresses the same?

  Thanks for all the help and solutions,
  Elgo

  Domain/server/business questions are best addressed @ Technet.  Answers is more connected consumer.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/categories/

• Unable to connect with RDP after you have configured the port forward

  I have configured my router with port pushing forcefully with port 3389. Now when I try to rdp to the pc from outside I get the following error:

  Remote Desktop cannot connect to the remote computer to one of the following reasons:

  1. remote access to the server is not enabled

  2. the remote computer is disabled

  3. the remote computer is not available on the network

  I checked that all these 3 does not apply to me. I was able to RDP pc (with the local ip address) from another pc in my network home but not from outside. Could someone help me please?

  Is the computer on which you want to connect with Remote Desktop [DRC], IE. the DRC, by using a host address static IP on your LAN? In the contrary case and the computer is restarted its possible its LAN IP address changed by denying any plan of port forwarding you set up in your router. Go to the site CanYouSeeMe and host DRC computer test.

  http://www.canyouseeme.org

  Also, when the connection to make sure that you really test from a client outside the DRC and does not use the public IP address of the router from a local computer on your local network.

  http://theillustratednetwork.MVPs.org/RemoteDesktop/TroubleshootingDiagrams/Basic.html

  Finally you are sure that the public IP address of the router has not changed? If you have a dynamic IP from your ISP, you can use a free as no - IP.com that maps a name to your public IP address. Call using the fully qualified domain name. Many routers support which is a free service like DynDNS for example. You can also download and install a small program on the host of the DRC. The program communicates with the No - IP or DynDNS servers on a regular basis. The server so you know what your current IP address and that map to your fully qualified domain name.

  http://www.no-IP.com/?utm_source=MSN&utm_medium=CPC&utm_term=no%20IP%20.com&utm_campaign=brand+MSN

  http://dyn.com/DNS/

• SSH port forward in upcoming white

  I am trying to set up a connection to database via a hopserver using SSH port forwarding, as described in the article by Jeff SSH Tunnel with #SQLDev 4.1 EA1 and ai2 side by side .  I have screenshots, but don't want to publish sensitive information in the forum - where the descriptive text instead.

  I have 4.1.0.18 SQL Developer build HAND - 18.37 (ai2), identical to his article.

  My laptop with SQL Developer (internal corporate network)

  My-jmpbox-01 (linux hopserver that I can ssh to)

  prod-db-01 (Server database DB on port 1521 of housing)

  From my laptop, I can't not directly to the prod-db-01.  First of all, I must first SSH to my-jmpbox-01.

  Therefore, in the developer SQL 4.1 ai2, here's what I'm trying to do:

  Display-> SSH

  click right-> new host SSH SSH hosts

  Host = my-jumpbox-01

  Port: 22

  Click OK

  Back to the host SSH window

  my_unix_user@my-JumpBox-01 right click-> TEST

  
  Enter your regular LDAP password

  Click OK

  Back to the host SSH pane:

  Click right my_unix_user@my-jumpbox-01 -> New Remote Port Forward

  Name prod-db-01

  Host: prod-db-01

  Port: 1521

  automatically assign the remote port

  Ok

  should now look like this:

  prod-db-01. right click-> CONNECT

  password

  and OK

  now move your mouse over the line of prod-db-01 and I see a DISTANT PORT (which probably indicates that he got a course valid tunnel).

  Back in the connections (top left) pane

  Click + icon (new connection)

  Display "new database connection:

  login name: prod-db-01

  user name: scott

  password: *.

  connection type: SSH

  Under the Port Forward Dropdown, I don't see the my_unix_user@my-jumpbox-01 or the prod-db-01-connection. It is completely empty.  The troubleshooting steps I can take? has anyone else seen this problem before?

  > Click right my_unix_user@my-jumpbox-01-> new remote Port Forward

  You want a LOCAL port forward

  Take a remote port, for example, your database server network traffic and forward on the SSH tunnel to another destination, say to your client computer.

  An attacker Local port would take your jdbc via SSH traffic to a another machine before a database connection was attempted.

• Airport of Port Forwarding is more?

  So I'm pretty new to this network thing. I don't know the technical network terms then please do not use (or at least their simplification). So I managed to set up my ASUS RT - something something router. I also put in some rules to sink my Xbox One anywhere port forwarding. However, I had problems with port forwarding, so I just used the dmz for her service. However, given that I had to move my Xbox to another part of my house with worst network connection, set up a time capsule for the network. After a long time, I managed to do the work, but now I can listen to is no longer my Xbox. My guess is that the port forwarding rules are not carriers, as it connected via ethernet time capsule and the capsule is connected to another time capsule via radio and this time capsule is connected to my ASUS router via ethernet. So my question is: how to transfer the required ports to my Xbox?

  If both of your time Capsules are configured as bridges, the Asus router is the one that needs to be set up on port mapping. The port mapping is used only when a router is configured for routing. In other words, the NAT and DHCP services are enabled. This is the default value for any router.

  Just to make sure that I understand your current network configuration, the following is correct?

  • ASUS > Time Capsule > > > Time Capsule > Xbox, where ' > ' represents a wired connection, and ' > > > ' represents a wireless.

• Port forwarding rules missing WNR1000V3

  I read a few posts here that may be similar, but they are so old, that threads are blocked. I'm trying to help out a local company add some rules to redirect to their server port WNR1000V3 more.

  They must have some configuration of port forwarding already because they are able to access an existing via RDP server so there is a rule somewhere for port 3389. However, it is has nothing listed in respect of port forwarding.

  My view on it after scratching my head for several hours, it's that there is either a port forwarding rules defined and running, but they are not displayed in the user interface, OR there is some screen that I have not found (was all!) where port forwarding is also configured.

  I think it's the first because there is no rule for the listed FTP, but if I try to add a new FTP rule, it displays a "conflict of Port with other services".

  Firmware is V1.0.2.62_60.0.87 although the router points out that there is an update.

  There is a known issue like this with this model? It seems a few years old.

  Thank you, Rob.

  Sorry, I would have given an update on that. I am aware of what means the error and it was probably that a rule on this port unless it was not displayed. I hoped that export Netgear configuration could be a human readable script (found on the Cisco routers), but it's not.

  After discussion about ServerFault and checking some of the suggestions there, it became clear that something was broken enough with the router. An update does not solve so I have taken note of all the settings and did a reset.

  That solved the problem. My theory is that some bugs in an earlier version of the firmware caused a bad record in order to be there for port forwarding. One that actually worked, but could not be displayed.

  Cheers, Rob.

• NETGEAR ProSafe VPN Firewall SRXN3205 and port forwarding?

  Hi, this is a long shot, but I'm pulling my hair out at this point and can be a bit over my head, as I am new on network

  Small short story, I have two servers, one is the NAS box (IE if I connect via the internet to the site via public IP network from home, I get it that site says 'my actions' I insert login and pass and get access to them.)
  That is, everything is peachy.
  The problem is when I try to connect to my FileMaker Server I'm not and instead, he takes me to the login NAS box. So I think ok, I need to port forward (5003 for filemaker) to go to different PC local LAN(192. etc)

  Security > firewall > Add Service entering:
  Service: fmserver
  Action: Always leave
  Send to LAN Server: unique address 192. etc is filemaker installed on (and different on a NAS)
  Definition of Port number: 5003<-- is="" this="" right?="" how="" else="" would="" you="" indicate="" you="" want="" all="" connections="" on="" this="" port="" to="" go="" to="" this="" specific="" lan="" machine="" from="" internet="" instead="" of="" default="" which="" seems="" to="" be="">
  rest is default, I click on apply.

  Here's what I don't understand. In the table of incoming Services, (security > firewall) I have two local IP in the list, a SIN, the other for Filemaker. But only the top works and can be connected to. I can move every top position and it will work, but they will not work at the same time, just the one that sits on the top of the sad Smiley page

  and yes I read the manual again and again and don't know how I'm screwing up the port forwarding on this point, even if I am brand new to probably something stupid Smiley Happy (our work IT guy is gone so tried to get involved through this somehow)

  Any help would be appreciated.

  Hello sinieq,

  There is a hierarchy on incoming service table, which is normal. I see 4 services added using "ANY" (ALL use any port number) you will need to remove/disable these because of the rule of the hierarchy on the table, all other services will be ignored when EVERYTHING is used. What is the port number used by the NAS Server? I don't see a port defined to access NAS. Try disabling services by using "ANY" and try again by adding the translation to the port number of the NAS.

  Let us know what happens.

  Thank you