Problem in Local storage

Similar Questions

• iCloud photo library and the problems of local storage of iOS

  I have iCloud library lit with iPhone active storage optimization. However, I still have more than 1 GB of space being taken up locally on my iOS. If all my photos that I take on iOS are automatically sent to iCloud for storing, why is there such a big mark always on my phone locally? If I try to remove my iOS device photos, I am prompted with a message indicating that this photo is deleted from all devices and iCloud. Is it possible to have all your photos sent to iCloud and then removed from your iOS device?

  You need to keep them on the device, or they will be deleted to iCloud. Optimization occurs according to the needs, not all at once.

• Problem when executing the processors in the nodes with disabled local storage

  Hello world
  
  We test the coherence JSR107 (a.k.a. JCache) implementation of Yannis (https://github.com/yannis666/Coherence-JSR-107) and we found the following issue when you work with a local storage where distributed cache node is disabled (using - Dtangosol.coherence.distributed.localstorage = false). Yannis implementation uses several EntryProcessors for the execution of operations get() or put () in the cache. For example, the following code is used to update a value in the cache:
  
  / public class PutProcessor implements InvocableMap.EntryProcessor {}
  
  @Override
  public Object process (input InvocableMap.Entry) {}
  BEntry entry = (BinaryEntry) BinaryEntry;
  return bEntry.isPresent ()? bEntry.getBinaryValue (): null;
  }
  
  }
  
  And put operatino is taken from the following code:
  
  namedCache.invoke (key, CPU)
  
  where processor argument contains a reference to the PutProcessor object.
  
  
  When we call JSR107 performs surgery put in the cache and code above we get following exception:
  
  java.lang.NullPointerException
  to com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.grid.partitionedService.PartitionedCache$ Storage.invoke (PartitionedCache.CDB:10)
  at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.grid.partitionedService.PartitionedCache.onInvokeRequest(PartitionedCache.CDB:52)
  to com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.grid.partitionedService.PartitionedCache$ InvokeRequest.run (PartitionedCache.CDB:1)
  at com.tangosol.coherence.component.net.message.requestMessage.DistributedCacheKeyRequest.onReceived(DistributedCacheKeyRequest.CDB:12)
  at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.Grid.onMessage(Grid.CDB:34)
  at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.Grid.onNotify(Grid.CDB:33)
  at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.grid.PartitionedService.onNotify(PartitionedService.CDB:3)
  at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.grid.partitionedService.PartitionedCache.onNotify(PartitionedCache.CDB:3)
  at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.Daemon.run(Daemon.CDB:42)
  at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
  
  Of course we have previously started another node in the cluster with local storage enabled.
  
  It seems that, as no storage card is present at the node, a NullPointerException is thrown when you try to insert the entry.
  
  Could someone give advice on this problem and how to overcome? This implementation is based on the processor is not compatible with the knots of localstorage cache disabled?
  
  Thank you in advance,
  
  Daniel C.

  Hello

  It sounds like COH-7180 - demand deserialization failure results in a cryptic NullPointerException, that has been fixed in one of the 3.7.1 patches. The real problem is that your entryprocessor cannot be deserialized.

• Permission to access local storage problem

  Hi guys recently I'm developing an application with the purpose of storing images downloaded from the internet to local storage.
  So I did some tests on a 8310. On this particular model he kept asking permission whenever he wanted access to local storage or network. It was slightly boring during normal operation but is impossible to use demand because he asked me for what seemed like every download of the image. On all my tests to date (especially on the 8800 and Perl series) I am able to respond at a time and give permanent security permissions requests access to the network, GPS and local storage.
  Is there a way to get the application to make a time permissions configuration?

  Application for authorization, the code is

  ApplicationPermissions permRequest = new ApplicationPermissions();
  permRequest.addPermission (ApplicationPermissions. PERMISSION_FILE_API);
  ApplicationPermissionsManager.getInstance () .invokePermissionsRequest (permRequest);

• In a local storage folder, I can't view messages beyond a certain date

  My most recent e-mail messages in a particular local storage folder cannot be found. I get the message "loading" and nothing happens. I updated for Thunderbird 38.2 this morning and then noticed the problem. It's especially bad, because this block of emails contains most of my banking passwords online.
  My operating system is Windows XP Pro Service pack 3

  Right-click on the folder and select Properties, then on the button repair.

  Note that XP is probably the worst place you can think of to store passwords for banking these days. More out of support most at risk, as you become.

• I get a request for local storage through Adobe flash which I can't get rid of

  When I opened a site of video or audio as the NPR media player http://www.npr.org/player/v2/mediaPlayer.html?action=2 & t = 1 & islist = false & id = 370394953 & m = 370394958 & live = 1 I get a request for Adobe Flash Player settings for Local storage. Clicking on accept or decline does not a doggone thing. I don't have the problem with Google Chrome, but I really prefer to use Firefox. I had the problem with other sites next to NPR (National Public Radio All Things Considered). It does not interfere with the download, but there really with the NPR player. My world will not end if you do not resolve the problem, but it would be nice if you could. I live in the Philippines, so that might be a factor.

  I use Windows 7 via a network (Globe Telecom) local DSL

  See the following page:

  • http://www.Macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings_manager07.html

• Flash does not work in FF26, it works in Chrome and IE. I reinstalled FF and Flash several times. I can't adjust the setting of local storage for Flash either.

  Flash does not work on some web sites. I never had a problem before with flash on FF in the nearly 15 years that I've used FF. Recently it has stopped working for some reason any and on some flash sites does not, NHL.com and site of kid Herotopia being just two of them. I updated FF, Adobe flash, the reinstalled version them repeatedly deleted all the files that have been stored on my laptop; that is, profiles, saved favorite nothing that I could find in user accounts and in the local app, low local and roaming data folders. What is strange, is that I can't set the local storage for flash either. When I visit the Adobe site to view the Adobe Flash Player Settings Manager I can move the scroll bar, but cannot check the: allow third-party flash content to store data on your computer. I can't do it on a Web site where the flash does not work. When I try and it changed on any site that it goes back to zero. Not sure if it is a part of the problem. I got tired of many suggestions on the pages of material here, but nothing works. I even tried this http://forums.adobe.com/message/4566499#4566499#4566499

  The other strange thing is that I used to get the "warning: script does not" prompt that displays "a script on this page may be busy, or it may have stopped responding." You can stop the script now, or you can continue to see if the script ends. "sometimes when I would buy on Macy's.com. This is the only site that it happened.
  I know I have only little technical knowledge, but I have tried to figure this out for a few days and do not know what is happening. The only thing I can think is that I somewhere files corrupted causing this problem. I have just updated to Windows 8.1 tonight in the hope that can help, but nothing helped. I would be very disappointing if I couldn't use FF or must go back using Chrome and FF.
  Sorry for the posting long but no solution would be much appreciated.

  Hi jscher2000,.

  Yes, I followed essentially the: Manual steps: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/968190?page=5#answer-509209 you have posted.

  And after restarting Firefox, Flash worked. Thanks again for your post I could not find this solution on the Adobe forums until you have posted the link.
  Your expertise and your time is much appreciated.

• Popup of local storage that cannot be granted or denied

  Computer of my mother who is an iMac running the most recent version, has begun to show this popup last night when she goes on shockwave.com to play games.  It says something about the local storage and gives you the ability to allow or deny.  (Sorry I don't have a screenshot, but I'm on my computer after working with him for hours).  The problem is that you can not click or either allow or refuse - he won't do anything.  I tried the tab options and it would move but nothing if you hit enter or SPACEBAR.  The only way out is to leave the site.

  I don't really know a lot about Adobe Flash so bear with me please.  She uses Firefox, but the same thing happened in Safari when I went to shockwave.com.  He arrived in Chrome at the moment.  The computer is almost new and I checked and the last version of Flash has been installed.  Just to try it, I uninstalled Flash and reinstalled and exactly the same thing happened when I went to this site.  She says she's only seen on this Web site.

  I have Firefox configured to always ask before running it.  I changed it so that it always runs for this particular site, but the popup was always there.  I researched and researched and exhausted all the options I can think.  It is not just a matter of the popup is annoying, is the fact that it will not go away, or allow you to click on what it is about that.  My elderly mother has very limited abilities and understanding when it comes to technology and online security is a huge concern.

  Does anyone have ideas about what could possibly help?  I appreciate all the help and assistance.  Thank you.

  Yes, it's a symptom of our anti-clickjacking too careful logic.  This happens usually when something animated moves behind the dialog box, or sometimes, it's just specific resolution/zoom-level.

  Unfortunately, as a browser plug-in, it's really hard to say whether or not we are above the thing on the screen, and we do not accept clicks on the dialog boxes for security unless we know that you actually see them and not other thing (for example "click here to win! 1. '') superimposed on top of it.

  Honestly, in 2016, restrict the ability of content to store data locally is not really buy you something meaningful in terms of privacy and security.  If you want to avoid persistent tracking chips, your browser's private browsing mode is much, much more efficient, and we pay tribute to her.  We also clear the Flash Player local shared objects when you clear cookies from your browser (to the extent that your browser tells us that you have done this).  Aversion for Flash Player local shared objects is largely based in the superstition at this stage.  The ability for marketers to create followed resilient, persistent is much more powerful in native HTML and JavaScript.  Feel free to look through my feeding activity to find similar posts, where I pointed the academic research on the subject, etc.

  So, here's my pragmatic recommendation:

  Go to settings > Flash Player > storage and choose allow sites to record information on this computer

  Where you do not want websites to save persistent information, use the private browsing mode.

  This accomplishes two things:

  -Content stores data locally, while everything seems to work normally to the content.

  -Flash Player nor the content will throw errors or permission dialog boxes

  -All data is stored in a temporary location, which is destroyed when you exit your private browsing session

  This gives you the best possible user experience and the best defense against tracking in Flash and HTML/JavaScript.  If you are in the business to uniquely identify people, it is a general practice at this stage to use all the technologies available for the redundancy and resilience, including techniques of both local fingerprinting that on the server side, so just to "solve" the Flash Player vector by disabling LSO does not significantly help.

  Unfortunately, the threat of clickjacking requires us to implement solutions less than optimal and the decade or so of experience with very smart people working on it shows that it is a game of whack-a-mole.  It is best to avoid scenarios where the dialog box gets jumped by adding fields to the trust list, or simply by allowing access to the total of just.  The ideal solution would be to move these to the browser native user interface dialog boxes, but which requires buy-in from all browser vendors involved, etc..

• Local storage shows as inactive in the web client

  Hello

  So I have a strange problem. On two of my guests, local storage shows as inactive in vCenter. I can access it without problem and there seems to be problems, but it is a bit concerning to see the alert whenever I am connected.

  

  However, when I checked in the thick client this error is not there. It is only in the web client for a reason any. I tried to restart the management agents, update storage adapters, and a new analysis of storage, but it has not changed.

  No idea what can be the cause and if it's something to worry about?

  Thank you!

  Please reboot the host and see again in the Web Client.

  BTW, what version of vSpehre for your environment?

• vSphere 6, impossible to use FT with local storage

  Hi guys,.

  Now that I understand that when you turn on FT without storage shared in any data warehouse results are displayed in dialog FT in the web client, I met a different problem (so the discussion topic).

  When I turn on FT for a virtual machine that is on the local storage, I'm now able to select data warehouses, but when I select the local storage for the secondary virtual machine, I get a lot of mistakes which tell me the secondary host cannot reach the .vmx file (of course - this is why I need shared storage - for these small files). Shouldn t FT copy the .vmx and all that has to be shared in the right place, because I said where it is? I need to move my VM to a shared storage, then move my VMDK and stuff for local storage manually?

  Here is a screenshot of the dialog box:

  

  Here are the current hardware configuration:

  ESX1:

  -IP: 192.168.220.51

  -Data warehouses: ESX1-LocalStorage and NFS

  ESX2:

  -IP: 192.168.220.52

  -Data warehouses: ESX2-LocalStorage and NFS

  My primary VM for FT is on ESX2 and try to get my high school on ESX1.

  Thank you!

  When I read about the new features of FT and it also replicates the storage, I also expect the ability to place FT VMs on non-shared storage. However, it seems that this is not an option (maybe in a later version, who knows).

  The vsphere availability Guide:

  Virtual Machine for the fault tolerance requirements

  ...

  • Virtual machines files should be stored on shared storage. Shared storage solutions include Fibre Channel, iSCSI (hardware and software), NFS and NAS.

  André

• HP ProLiant DL160 - cannot create the data with local storage (controller, no RAID) store

  Hi all. I appreciate your time and comments.

  Using VMware ESXi (initially), installation (VMware ESXi 5.5.0, 1331820) will very well (install on USB). Able to enter in the console of the vSphere Client, everything seems normal. Any attempt to use local storage, however, is filled with this error message: http://i.imgur.com/40ySsOS.png

  "It was not correct to specified parameters. Vim.Host.DiskPartitionInfo.spec"-" 'HostStorageSystem.ComputerDiskPartitionInfo' call for object 'storage system' on ESXi "< ip address >" failed. "

  I tried both the base (from VMware) installation disc and the "Custom" (HP) HP installation disk. Both have the same problem: all facilities, but local disks - as seen while - are not able to serve local storage. It worked very well (previous incarnation was as Server 2003 file server, no reported\noticed questions). It's not under warranty, its going to be used as a laboratory server. All this seems to work well.

  Specifics:

  HP DL160 G6

  Storage card: ICH10 6 Port SATA AHCI Controller

  Discs: 3 G MDL 500 GB 7200

  Controller and the disks are perceived by the system: http://i.imgur.com/3PAKQHL.png

  Can someone point me in the right direction on what to go here? Research on the error messages do not lead to a lot of help. I'll get more pending. I would be grateful.

  This could be a problem with the current data on the disk. I suggest clean you the partition info using the DD explained to the KB VMware: Troubleshooting in the add storage Wizard error: cannot read this disk partition information to see if that solves the problem.

  André

• ESX 4 Local Storage Name Changed - can't change back

  Recently, I move my VMware farm.  When I got to the top, one of local storage devices came back as "Local (1).  I've never had one (1) about this before and now all VMS are orphans.  When I try to change the name back to just 'Local', he says that there is already, which it is not.  Somehow, VMware has become confused!

  Anyone knows how I can bring the 'Local' and the virtual machine without having to remove and re-add?  There are some VM who really "may not be moved" because of a restriction of the application.

  Thanks in advance!

  Hello

  as you mentioned several blades, I assume you are also using vCenter Server.

  How have you tried to rename the data store, by connecting to vCenter Server or directly on the affected ESX Server?

  Maybe the vCenter DB contains an entry in database 'outdated' that block any operation rename.

  I saw similar problems when I tried to rename a data store, while it is directly connected to an ESX Server, which was managed by a vCenter server.

  I managed to rename the data store, but more or less immediately after it was renamed from the original name.

  So if possible, I would

  • disconnect/remove this host ESX to vCenter
  • connect the vSphere Client directly to the ESX Server
  • new attempt by renaming the local data store
  • Check the changes are permanent/accepted
  • Reconnect/add a return to vCenter ESX host

  Good luck

  Ralf

• Local storage for ESXi - SD USB or a traditional hard drive

  We will replace our ESX host soon with new hardware and I'm on the fence about the use of a player USB SD 4 GB or traditional hard drives in a RAID. Obviously, the reader SD has its advantages, namely its speed and reliability, but is reliable enough to give up using redundant hard drives?

  As someone mentioned previously, we spend much of our time concerned with our redundant hard disks, expecting to fail. Several times the failure is related to moving parts in the drive also. SD readers have the pleasure of having no moving parts to wear out or fail. But what good are they?

  Sells the dealer that I spoke with them for 3 years and never heard of a failure. His $62 for 4 GB, so it's not a bottom of the line edit. It is designed to be in a HP DL380G7, once again, I doubt that it is a lower end model.

  I'm leaning toward the SD drive rather than traditional drives, but I wanted to get feedback from others who may have used this before configuration. I'm looking for the successes and failures (and the reason for the failure).

  4 GB is enough for installation (ESXi 4.1) and I have not any more local storage as VM is on the shared storage and the assistance as AppSpeed and esXpress VM program I can also install it on the shared storage (where in our current datacenter these are installed on the local storage). Or should I worry about this size with respect to logging or something else?

  Thanks in advance, please discuss.

  Eduard Tieseler

  I had a fight 100 ESX hosts running by USB - only questions I ever had were with the original green USB keys that HP provided in the first days of ESXi on USB.

  I like the approach of USB for several reasons:

  1. no local physical disk required, less moving parts = less material problems

  2. If you have local physical disks, you can use these as the dumping grounds for the ISOs etc.

  3. If rebuilding a server, I can remove the old USB key and press a new - and recover simply by replacing the OLD USB key

  4. I can pre-generate a USB one double key as a method of construction of servers in bulk (not tested on 4.1u1 well)

  5. I've had many many hard drive failures. . USB (except Green HP ones) have never failed on me.

  In addition, your syslog problem isn't treally a 0 - practice problem is to get servers to connect to a centralized in any case syslog box (I would even if I used not USB/SD)

  Good luck - let us know what you decide.

• Dealing with the Local Storage block size (vSphere 4)

  I have a pretty basic question / easy I think I know the answer want to but to double check.  I spaced that vSphere 4.0 uses a default size of 1 MB, which began to cause problems with our backup software try to attach block vmdk is greater than 256 GB in size.  I want to continue to use local storage for our assistants of esXpress but to do this I need to have a larger block size to the local vmfs volume...  Question is can I safely delete the local storage (if nothing is done off of it) and add it and increase the block size or is there a way of installing to set greater than 1 MB block size?

  Easy points.  Thank you guys.

  • Kyle

  Remember, by default your COS is installed on local storage, so do not remove.

  I think this article gives you the best solution

  http://KB.VMware.com/kb/1012683

• Is it possible to run vcbmounter (or a free alternative) so that it doesn't copy vmdk local storage?

  Hi all

  Another question about vcbmounter. Just get the part my implementation of VSphere backup and will go with backup exec and vcb. Have divided into EMC cx500 san fc vcb proxy. I am able to run vcbmounter on my vcb proxy and he rides out of my vmdk files no problem. It seems, however, that when I try to mount vmdk directly (forget the name now), there is a copy and conversion process that takes a lot of time. So I guess that the vmdk everything is copied to a local storage of the vcb proxy?

  Is there a way like the "files" mode, where it rises only the vmfs file system and the vmdk can be copied directly to tape?

  Thanks in advance!

  Liam-

  vcbMounter will ABSOLUTELY instant of your VM and copy it to the SAN disk via the proxy. Unfortunately, it will not directly copy on tape. Check out my Guide to proven practices VCB on VI:OPS. He will explain VCB for you and how to make it work with your software backup-> http://viops.vmware.com/home/docs/DOC-1392

  Dave Convery

  VMware vExpert 2009

  http://www.dailyhypervisor.com

  http://Twitter.com/dconvery

  Prudent. We do not want to make of this.

  Bill Watterson, "Calvin and Hobbes".