Question on the aggregation rule

Similar Questions

• Questions of the aggregator

  I'm desperate charges aggregate but having problems.  My last one is that I saved a project like SWF and that he did not understand the HTML 5.  the thought that as aggregator saw the file OK did, I get this error

  Sorry, it's so hard to read.  Point is, he says it isn't an Adobe AS3 file.  What is c?  Since I did it with Cap; tive, it would make sense that Captivate should be able to read.

  They are very old Captivate published of the SWF? Before 5, AS2 was often used. But your other similar question, in my view, that you have problems with the workflow to create an aggregator project.

  Normal workflow for the aggregator is:

  • publish the Captivate SWF files, you only need the SWF itself
  • Click on the + button in the aggregator and point to a SWF file
  • continue to do this second step
  • indicate the SWF file to use as the master movie, its parameters for TOC will be used
  • Finally, you can override the info by using the Info button
  • Save the aggregator project, the extension will be aggr
  • check publish settings (important if you need do a right-click feature, default accessibility is turned on)
  • Publish it

• Questions on the aggregation of data for parents

  Hi guys,.
  
  I have two questions.
  
  One, once I have enter data in the leaf level, values aggregate to their parent except period dimension. The aggregation method is elsewhere, conservation never share type and data type is currency. Should provide the member formula to calculate the value for high level members?
  
  Two, some nonleaf members need their own values. For example, a business in the entity dimension unit has some departments. Apart from the consolidation of departments, the BU needs a budget for itself. But members nonleaf cells are read-only. How to deal with my situation?
  
  Thank you

  You can't, not in a release from the bottom up. You can allot of bu1_ to his brothers and sisters. Or you can use the version of up and down, to parents of input values and allocate up to nonleaf members.

  See you soon,.
  Alp

• A question about the aggregation

  Hello
  
  A question on the having clause - can be used in a query that is not a group by clause?
  
  Thank you

  Depends on the selected columns:

  SQL> select count(*)
    2  from   dual
    3  having count(*) > 0;
  
    COUNT(*)
  ----------
           1
  
  1 row selected.
  
  SQL> select dummy
    2  ,      count(*)
    3  from   dual
    4  having count(*) > 0;
  select dummy
         *
  ERROR at line 1:
  ORA-00937: not a single-group group function
  

• Question about the business rule

  Hello
  
  If I've updated the business rule by updating a parameter in the Dev Environment, I need to export this business rule in the Prod environment or can I directly change the code in the production environment.
  
  Please advice me on this.
  
  Kind regards
  
  Upendra.

  Hello

  To import the xml data, just go on your prod EAS, make right click on Business Rules > import and select the xml file.

  See you soon

  John
  http://John-Goodwin.blogspot.com/

• Question of the aggregation of the ASO

  Hello
  I use ASO cube mdx formula for one child account and this account of a most sibilling account .those two accounts should be upto rold parent and need to give the result, but in my case, I do not get any rold account value and parent, view data by '0 '.
  
  Ex:
  
  Acct1 (+) (Parent)
  Acct11 (+)
  Acct12 (+) [formula MDX]
  
  
  Thank you

  try increasing the resolution on the parent order. If this does not work, try increasing the order of resolution on the parent and the stereotyped member. It is possible that the data for the formula not available when the formula is fired.

• Difference between the formula rule and column aggregation in edit form

  Someone please help this is the use of aggregation formula rule and column in column edit option.
  
  
  What is the difference if I ask the sum in the aggregation rule to apply sum (column name) in the formula in the column.
  
  When do I need to use that one.
  
  
  Thanks in advance

  When you create a column of the RPD, you have the opportunity to determine whether the column should be aggregated in some way or not. For dimension columns, you would not put the aggregation. To say, a column of accounting balance account, you may be putting the SUM or AVERAGE aggregate. Aggregation put you on this column will be 'default' column aggregation in the responses.

  Thus, in Answerrs, if you use the balancing item of the account column and you have only the size of the region, will bring together the OBIEE or SUM the book balances in order to have an AMOUNT for the level of the region. If you district, that the balance of the book column will consolidate at the district level. It is a convenient way to create reports without having to specify what should be aggregation.

  However, OBIEE gives you the ability to override what the default aggregation for a particular column. It is the purpose of the drop down at the bottom left of a column when you click the fx button.

  Say the aggregation by default of the book balance is the SUM of the RPD, but for the report that you create, you want to calculate the average, you can apply the AVERAGE function in the fx window and it will be overridge rule of SUM aggregation which was to the RPD.

  I have it?

• More efficient aggregation rule

  Hello
  
  Whenever we still one change in a particular combination of Member data, to run the aggregation rule, to show the effect of the change on the higher levels, every time. The rule takes 6 minutes - 8 mins to run. The script we use is as follows:
  
  AGG ("entity");
  
  Is this a normal procedure? If not, is there another way through the consolidation can be done most effectively?
  
  Kind regards
  
  Soglo

  @ANCESTORS is sometimes a good one to use in this situation, Cameron wrote an excellent blog-http://camerons-blog-for-essbase-hackers.blogspot.com/2009/06/why-i-hate-and-love-business-rules-part_17.html

  See you soon

  John
  http://John-Goodwin.blogspot.com/

• Aggregation rule doesn't work does not correctly after a change in level of generation

  Hello
  
  We have changed the level of the generation of a member of dimension 4 generation 3 generation. After changing the same, we have made the business of the aggregation rule. The result of the aggregation rule did not include the Member of dimension to the level of the generation that has been changed.
  
  Is this standard behavior? If this is not the case, can someone please respondent for a solution to this problem?
  
  Kind regards
  
  Amjad

  What is the property of the aggregation of the Member? You confirmed that the aggregation is not set on ignore or never?

  How do you use the aggregation? Do you need overall lack of your rule and if so, did you include the VALUE AGGMISSG on in your business rule? The aggregation code sharing can help to understand what is happening.

• VCP5-VTC Exam questions vs the rule VCP510 question?

  Could someone advise if VCP5-VTC examination questions are the same question as VCP510?

  VCP510 is the code to review, VCP5-VTC is the title of certification.

  Download the review plan to discover the objectives of the review - you can find that here: Virtualization VCP-Datacenter (VCP5-VTC)

• Table css rule the question of the definition

  table {}

  background: 66330;

  It is in the code, but look at the css rule for the table. There is no show background color and 663300 is in a position to table? Anyone know why? Thank you Donna

  Donna,.

  Missing octothorpe.

  table {}

  background: #663300;

  }

  Nancy O.

• Does Windows natively support the aggregation of links?

  There are some descriptions on the aggregation of links in Wikipedia.

  http://en.Wikipedia.org/wiki/Link_aggregation

  "Note that Microsoft Windows does support not natively the aggregation of links (at least until Windows Server 2008)."

  I was wondering if this description is accurate? And what about the new windows operating system, such as Windows Server 2012 edition?

  Windows xp, Windows 7 and Windows 8 natively supports the aggregation of links? If the answer if not, anyone know why? I know, Linux and other operating systems support the aggregation of links.

  Hi, Peacegump,

  For NIC teaming or link aggregation support, you will need to contact your provider network adapter or an OEM (for example, Dell offers a driver of consolidation).  They provide you with a driver that allows the grouping of NETWORK adapters, because Windows does not offer this feature in the core of the operating system.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/winserverPN/thread/f200b747-d9fb-4632-b6a4-aaf89c3dcc9b

  Grouping network adapter and clustered servers

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/254101

  How to use matching with Advanced Networking Services (YEARS)?

  http://www.Intel.com/support/network/sb/CS-009747.htm

  Windows 7 - aggregation of links to double bandwidth: 2 p., 2 network cards of each

  http://www.SevenForums.com/network-sharing/124720-link-aggregation-bandwidth-doubling-2pcs-2-NICs-each.html

  If you need more information, transfer your question on the Forum on TechNet.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/winserverPN/threads

• Question about the license of Windows Vista

  Hello. I didn't know where I should post this. I have Windows Vista, I purchased an upgrade. My question is, "I am allowed to install the software on a friends computer. Because I don't need the software, can I sell the software. I know that Microsoft has its policies, but I don't know what they are. I don't want to do something that I'm not supposed to do.

  Thank you.

  Original title: Microsoft Software
  

  Hello

  You posted in the appropriate Forum.

  Yes, a retail upgrade license can be transferred, as long as it is removed from where it was originally installed.

  One license is for a SINGLE Installation.

  ___________________________________

  These are the General rules for OEM and retail licenses, which can also help you in the future:

  If the machine came with the preinstalled Windows operating system (Dell, HP, Acer, etc.), this product key supplied with the laptop is preinstalled OEM license and is not transferable.

  OEM license/product key (systems of operating pre-installed on Dell, HP, etc.) is related to the first machine it is installed on and dies when dies of this machine.

  Only retail Operating System license that you buy and install yourself, are allowed to be transferred to another machine.

  And retail licenses also can be installed on a machine at one time.

  See you soon

• Ask questions about the functionality of EA8500 MU-MIMO

  Dear Linksys

  I bought EA8500, and it arrived today.

  I have two questions about the functionality of MU-MIMO of EA8500 AP.

  1. I want to compare the performance between SU-MIMO and MU-MIMO, but there is no option to control this feature in the router admin page. Is that one of the possible ways?

  2 EA8500 supports 1733 Mbps wireless speed, but it resembles the speed of 1 Gbps ethernet cable.

  This router supports really speed 1 Gbps ethernet? or y at - it an option to support more throughput as the aggregation of links?

  Thank you

  Hi, hyeonu. For your first query, it is not possible because there is no option to disable the feature of MU-MIMO on your Linksys EA8500 router. In addition, with regard to your second, you can get a higher throughput of 1 Gbps since this is the maximum capacity of your ethernet connection.

• Windows 7 firewall, just after the power rules

  Hello

  Setting up a private workgroup-to-peer network (not homegroup, no servers or domain) of several PC windows 7.  Have all network connections, defined as 'private' of networks.  At that time, the private firewall is disabled, and the Public firwall is enabled.  Administration tool using remote third 3rd RAdmin connect and control the PC.

  Strange behavior just after turn on/off the PC.  Can ping from one PC to another, but RAdmin tool fails to connect to a PC on just.  The 'Public' windows firewall log shows the RAdmin TCP packet dropped.  Once someone has logged on locally to the computer and then connected to the wide, the RAdmin packages are no longer considered (fell or permitted) by the Public firewall, and the RAdmin progam works great.

  I added a test rule to allow all TCP traffic through any firewall from any PC, any user, any port, etc. (essentially large open) and still have the problem where RAdmin specific TCP packets are lost by the Public firewall.

  I can get it to work by setting the 'incoming connections' for the Public firewall to 'Always allow', but is not an acceptable solution.

  I worked with the provider of 3rd party s/w (famatech) and they also have no idea why it works this way.

  Any ideas how the Windows 7 firewall works right after that the PC is on, but before the user login?  Any ideas how can I do an acceptable firewall rule which will be in force after powering on, but before that the user log?

  Thank you in advance for any help or any other ideas,

  Rick

  Answered my own question.  Found that a set Local GPO do not merge rules defined by the user.  When I moved the RAdmin rule throughout the local Group Policy object, problem goes away.