Race weight affecting the size of the object and alignment

Similar Questions

• Race weight between the hard and soft lines?

  IM an ellipse with a race drawing 1px. If I change the race to the hard line the result is horribly pixelated, but if I use the sweet line the restult is too broad (it seems thicker than the straight line of 1px). Is their way to achieve something in the meantime maing the soft line or thinner than the default 1px setting?

  Thank you

  It affects only the soft lines, making them a little harder or softer.

• will never be an update where you can erase a background object of an image without clear photo behind the object and have the result as if the object was not always on the picture in the first place.

  Will never be an update where you can erase a background object of an image without clear photo behind the object and have the result as if the object was not always on the picture in the first place.

  I guess this feature without doubt not will be part of Lightroom because of the non-destructive nature publishing. Is that programs like Photoshop are for. But I don't speak for Adobe, because I do not work for them, and I did not all understand what are their plans for the future.

• Grids of, how to place above the objects and placed images?

  PS the grid can be displayed above the jpegs allowing me to measure exactly, AI shows the grid below placed images and vector obects, which means that I am not the squares of the Board through the objects and images to place my other lines and shapes, is this possible? Place the rack over the objects and placed images?

  Yes. In the preferences: guides & grids: uncheck the box for the grids at the rear. easy.

• Should we leave how much free space on the C drive before affecting the performance and speed?

  Hello!

  Hard drive of my new PC (C) is 1 TB (processor Samsung 7i, Windows 8.1). It doesn't have any other disk/partition. How this space is safe to use to store large files (videos, esp., stored in the native video library file) without harming the performance and speed?

  And if I create another partition (D) and just use it for storage, it will make much difference compared to the above?

  Thank you!

  Anna

  Sunday, March 1, 2015 10:59 + 0000, AnaFilipaLopes wrote:

  And if I create another partition (D) and just use it for storage, it will make much difference compared to the above?

  Planning your Partitions

  The Question

  Partitions, how much should I have on my hard drive, what do I use
  each of them for, and what size should each one be?

  It s a common question, but unfortunately this doesn t have a
  only simple, just answer to all the world. A lot of people will respond with
  the way they do, but their response isn't necessarily best for the
  person seeking (in many cases it isn't right even for the person)
  response).

  Terminology

  First, let's rethinking the terminology. Some people ask "should I".
  partition my drive? That s the wrong question, because the
  the terminology is a little strange. Some people think that the word
  "partition" means divide the drive into two or more partitions.
  That s not correct: to partition a drive is to create one or several
  partitions on it. You must have at least one partition to use
  He who think they have an unpartitioned disk actually
  have a player with only one partition on it and it s normally
  Called C:. The choice you have is to have more than one
  partition, not that it's the partition at all.

  A bit of history

  Back before Windows 95 OEM Service Release 2 (also known as Windows
  95 (b) was published in 1996, all MS-DOS and Windows hard drives have been set
  using the file system FAT16 (except for very tiny to aid
  FAT12). That 16-bit only because were used for addressing, FAT16 has a
  maximum 2 GB partition size.

  More than 2 GB of hard disks were rare at the time, but if you had
  one, you must have multiple partitions to use all the available
  space. But even if your drive was not larger than 2GB, FAT16 created
  Another serious problem for many people - the size of the cluster has been
  more great if you had a larger partition. Cluster sizes increased from 512
  bytes for a partition to no greater than32Mb all the way up to 32 KB for a
  partition of 1 GB or more.

  More the cluster size, the space more is wasted on a hard drive.
  That s as space for all the files is allocated in whole clusters
  only. If you have 32 KB clusters, a 1 byte file takes 32 KB, a file, a
  greater than 32 k byte takes 64 k and so on. On average, each file
  about half of his last group waste.

  If large partitions create a lot of waste (called "soft"). With a 2 GB
  FAT16 drive in a single cluster, if you have 10,000 files, each
  lose half a cluster of 32 KB, you lose about 160 MB for relationships. This s
  back in an important part of a player that probably cost more than $400
  1996 - around $ 32.

  So what did the people? They divided their 2 GB drive in two,
  three or more logical drives. Each of these logical drives has been
  smaller the real physical disk, had smaller clusters, and
  so less waste. If, for example, she was able to keep all the partitions
  less than 512 MB, cluster size was only 8 KB, and the loss was reduced to a
  a quarter of what it would be otherwise.

  People partitioned for other reasons also, but back in the days of
  FAT16, it was the main reason to do so.

  The present

  Three things have changed radically since 1996:

  1. the FAT32 and NTFS file systems came along, allowing a larger
  partitions with smaller clusters and so much less waste. In
  with NTFS, cluster sizes are 4 K, regardless of the size of the partition.

  2 hard drives have become much larger, often more than 1 TB (1000 GB) in
  size.

  3 hard drives have become much cheaper. For example, a 500 GB drive
  can be bought today for about $50. That s 250 times the size of this
  Player 2Gb typical 1996, about one-eighth of the price.

  What these things mean together which is the reason to be old to have
  multiple partitions to avoid the considerable wastage of disk space left.
  The amount of waste is much less than it used to be and the cost of
  that waste is much less. For all practical purposes, almost nobody does
  should no longer be concerned about slack, and it should no longer be
  has examined when planning your partition structure.

  What Partitions are used for today

  There are a variety of different ways people put in place several
  scores of these days. Some of these uses are reasonable, some are
  debatable, some are downright bad. I'll discuss a number of Commons
  partition types in the following:

  1. a partition for Windows only

  Most of the people who create such a partition are because they believe
  If they never have to reinstall Windows properly, at least they
  He won t lose their data and he won t have to reinstall their applications.
  because both are safe on other partitions.

  The first of these thoughts is a false comfort and the second
  is downright bad. See the analysis of the types of partition 2 and 4
  below to find out why.

  Also note that over the years, a lot of people who find their windows
  partition that has begun to be the right size proves to be too
  small. For example, if you have such a partition for Windows and later
  upgrade to a newer version of Windows, you may find that your Windows
  partition is too small.

  2. a partition for installed programs

  This normally goes hand in hand with the partition type 1, a partition for
  just Windows. The thought that if you reinstall Windows, your
  installed application programs are safe if they are in another
  partitions is simply not true. That s because all programs installed
  (with the exception of an occasional trivial) have pointers to the inside
  Windows, in the registry and elsewhere, as well as associated files
  buried in the Windows folder. So if Windows, pointers and
  the files go with it. Given that the programs need to be reinstalled if Windows
  the fact, this reasoning to a separate partition for programs not
  work. In fact, there is almost never a good reason to separate
  Windows of the software application into separate partitions.

  3. a partition for the pagefile.

  Some people think mistakenly that the pagefile on another
  score will improve performance. It is also false; It doesn t
  help and often I hurt, performance, because it increases the movement of the head
  to get back to the page to another file frequently used
  data on the disk. For best performance, the paging file should normally
  be on the most widely used score of less used physical player. For
  almost everyone with a single physical disk than the same drive s
  Windows is on C:.

  4. a partition for backup for other partitions.

  Some people make a separate partition to store backups of their other
  or partitions. People who rely on a "backup" are a joke
  themselves. It is only very slightly better than no backup at all.
  because it leaves you likely to be simultaneously the original losses
  and backup for many of the most common dangers: the head crashes and other
  types of drive, serious glitches to power failure, near lightning
  strikes, virus attack, even stolen computer.  In my opinion,.
  secure backup must be on a media removable and not stored in the
  computer.

  5. a partition for data files

  Above, when I discussed separate Windows on a clean partition,
  I pointed out that separate data from Windows is a false comfort if
  He of done with the idea that data will be safe if Windows ever
  must be reinstalled. I call it a false comfort that's because
  I'm afraid many people will rely on this separation, think that their
  data are safe there and so do not take measures to
  Back it up. In truth the data is not safe there. Having to reinstall
  Windows is just one of the dangers to someone a s hard disk and not
  probably even one. This kind of "backup" falls into the same
  category, as a backup to other partitions partition; It lets you
  sensitive to the simultaneous loss of the original and the backup on many of
  the most common dangers that affect the entire physical disk, not
  just the particular partition. Security comes from a solid backup
  diet, not how partition you.

  However, for some people, it may be a good idea to separate Windows and
  programs on the one hand of the data on the other, putting each of the
  two types into separate partitions. I think that most people
  partitioning scheme must be based on their backup system and backup
  plans are generally of two types: whole hard disk imaging
  or data only backup. If you back up data, backup is
  usually facilitated by the presence of a separate with data only partition;
  to save just the score easily, without having to
  collect pieces from here and elsewhere. However, for
  those who backup by creating an image of the entire disk, there is
  usually little, if any, benefit the separation of data in a partition of
  its own.

  Furthermore, in all honesty, I must point out that there are many
  very respected people who recommend a separate partition for Windows,
  Whatever your backup plan.  Their arguments haven t convinced
  me, but there are clearly two views different here.

  6. a partition to image files

  Some people like to deal with the images and videos as something separate
  other data files and create a separate partition for them. To my
  the spirit, an image is simply another type of data and there is no
  the advantage in doing so.

  7. a partition for music files.

  The comments above related to the image files also apply to music
  files. They are just another type of data and must be dealt with the
  just like the other data.

  8. a partition for a second operating system to dual-boot to.

  For those who manage several operating systems (Windows Vista, Windows
  XP, Windows 98, Linux, etc.), a separate partition for each operating
  system is essential. The problems here are beyond the scope of this
  discussion, but simply to note that I have no objection to s
  all these partitions

  Performance

  Some people have several partitions because they believe that it
  somehow improves performance. That s not correct. The effect is
  probably low on modern computers with modern hard disks, but if
  whatever it is, the opposite is true: more music mean poorer
  performance. That's because normally no partition is full and it
  so are gaps between them. It takes time for the drive s
  read/write heads to cross these gaps. Close all files
  are, faster access to them will be.

  Organization

  I think a lot of people overpartition because they use scores as a
  organizational structure. They have a keen sense of order and you want to
  to separate the apples from the oranges on their readers.

  Yes, separating the different types of files on partitions is a
  technical organization, but then is to separate different types of
  files in folders. The difference is that the walls are static and
  fixed in size, while the files are dynamic, changing size automatically
  as needed to meet your changing needs. This usually done records
  a much better way to organize, in my opinion.

  Certainly, partitions can be resized when necessary, but except with the latter
  versions of Windows, which requires a third-party software (the and the
  possibility to do so in Windows is primitive compared to the third-party
  solutions). These third party software normally costs money and not
  any point and how stable it is, affects the entire disk.
  with the risk of losing everything. Plan your partitions in
  first place and repartitioning, none will be necessary.  The need
  to repartition usually occurs as a result of overpartitioning in
  the first place.

  What often happens when people organize with partitions instead
  records are that they make a miscalculation of how much room they need on each
  This partition, and then when they run out of space on the partition
  When a file is logically, while having plenty of space
  on the other hand, they simply saving the file in the score of "poor".
  Paradoxically, therefore, results in this kind of score structure
  less organization rather than more.

  So how should I partition my drive

  If you read what came before, my findings will not come as a
  surprise:

  1. If your backup set is the image of the entire disk, have just one
  single (usually c partition :));

  2. If you backups just data, have two partitions one for Windows and
  application programs installed (usually c :)), the other for data
  (normally D :).)

  With the exception of multiple operating systems, it is rarely
  any advantage to have more than two partitions.

• The distance between the objects and not the objects themselves scale

  I work with a card and who is currently around A4 in size but will print about A0, cities are so numerous that they overlap on the small map. I hope that there is a way to change the positions up to size without scaling objects in this way, they must not overlap into the completed task. I use illustrator CS3.

  Jim,

  Before experimenting, always save a copy of the but not destroyed work.

  Have you tried:

  (1) to select the entire document (what you want to have at the present time, or relative, different size), possibly through selection > even > what is relevant, then object > transform > transform each uniform scale to the relative scale reduction (6.25% if you want to keep the size A4),

  (2) to select the entire document and scale up to 1600%?

• Revolution of the object and the object Cube transitions do nothing?

  I love the transitions of the 'object' - Flip Object, object Pop, object Zoom, etc. But two transitions do not seem to do anything. Revolution of object (which is new) and the object Cube (which is not) do not seem to animate anything on the slide. Am I missing something?

  Both work fine on our systems at Yosemite

• How to read the objects and collections dynamically?

  Hello
  I want to read database/collection objects dynamically. Please advice!
  Here is an example
  
  Create the user as an object type (name varchar2 (100), number (3)) of the age
  /
  
  create a family of fonts as a user table
  /
  
  I want to do something like this
  
  DECLARE
  user of the var;
  BEGIN
  ...
  ...
  SELECT "family (1)" INTO var FROM DUAL;
  ...
  ...
  END;
  /
  
  Thank you

  As I suggested, you can define your own method of "diff" for the object. You haven't told us exactly what form you would like to work to take. I'll define a (pretty useless) function which will just create a string that tells you how to modify the data of an object to match the data in another. Obviously, you would like a more useful output. Potentially, rather than a member function, you can choose a procedure Member who emits DML is required for the underlying table is necessary.

  SQL> ed
  Wrote file afiedt.buf
  
    1  CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE location_typ AS
    2  OBJECT
    3  (
    4    building_no NUMBER,
    5    city        VARCHAR2(40),
    6    MEMBER FUNCTION diff(
    7                l location_typ)
    8    RETURN VARCHAR2
    9  )
   10* ;
  SQL> /
  
  Type created.
  
  SQL> ed
  Wrote file afiedt.buf
  
    1  CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE BODY location_typ
    2  AS
    3    MEMBER FUNCTION diff(
    4      l location_typ)
    5    RETURN VARCHAR2
    6    IS
    7      l_diff_str varchar2(4000);
    8    BEGIN
    9      IF building_no != l.building_no THEN
   10        l_diff_str := 'Building_no needs to change from ' || building_no ||
   11                         ' to ' || l.building_no;
   12      END IF;
   13      IF city != l.city THEN
   14        l_diff_str := l_diff_str ||
   15                        'City needs to change from ' || city ||
   16                          ' to ' || l.city;
   17      END IF;
   18      RETURN l_diff_str;
   19    END;
   20* END;
   21  /
  
  Type body created.
  
  SQL> DECLARE
    2    loc location_typ;
    3    secloc location_typ;
    4    a NUMBER;
    5  BEGIN
    6    loc    :=NEW location_typ(300, 'San Francisco');
    7    secloc :=NEW location_typ(200, 'Redwood Shores');
    8    dbms_output.put_line( loc.diff( secloc ) );
    9  END;
   10  /
  Building_no needs to change from 300 to 200City needs to change from San
  Francisco to Redwood Shores
  
  PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
  

  Justin

  Published by: Justin Cave on 9 April 2012 14:12

• Edit the object and then save back causes the object to move?

  Hello

  I use Acrobat X 10.1.6 update. When you edit PDF documents in a right-click and then by selecting "Change the subject", I get my usual Illustrator pop-up window, change my color or anything else, save, moves back to Acrobat, and the object in question! This has only started happening recently and I have been using Acrobat on a daily basis in my work, as a device, since Acrobat 7 Professional prepress and never had this problem.

  Please tell us what is causing the object to move? I re-installed Acrobat today and being updated and no change. I also have several colleagues on the different versions of Acrobat from 9.5.3 to 10.1.6 who cannot reproduce this problem, even on the same PDF file?

  Thanks in advance.

  Tom.

  I have a feeling it may be a problem of Illustrator. That update?

• Display of all the objects and the lines of Source Code

  I'm currently running OEM in 10 g and I have two questions:
  
  1. How can I find an object when I know the name, but not the object type? For example, to have the name of the object, but I don't know if it's a package, procedure, function or what. How can I get information about this object in OEM?
  
  2. when I'm compiling an object invalid such as a procedure and I get errors, the compiler displays the errors and line numbers. However, the source field does not display line numbers (like the old Java version OEM did). Is there a way to get the current line number?
  
  I can easily do both in SQL * more. I just want to know if OEM has these capabilities.
  
  Thank you!

  Regarding question No. 1:
  -good question! But there is no way to search an object without specifying the type of object

  HTH

• Break the association between the object and original transformation?

  Hello

  

  After I had created an array of doubles for the original design, I've found that once the original object is modified, all copies are changed automatically thereafter.

  Is it possible to break the link between the original object and are copies of the transformation, so that the subsequent changes can be made on each individual copy?

  Bob

  Change > separate attributes. This will give you the items as a group. The transform is more effective.

  Judy Arndt

• Question about the scope of the object and memory.

  I created a class that extends Sprite.

  In this class, I have a private type BitmapData var

  I then add the Sprite as a child to another Sprite on the stage.

  Later, I delete the second Sprite (parent) of the scene and I put the variable referring to it to null.

  After the garbage collection (assuming that it happen correctly) there is no trace of the BitmapData?

  No, unless you did something extra.  If you cannot reference your bitmapdata object (and has no listener), he is eligible for gc.

• [ADF, JDev12.1.3] Manages the pageFlowScope same bean validation of the different fragments of BTF. Doubts about the 'object' and 'uiComponents' validator parms

  Hallo,

  I have a 'registration' process bounded with 4 fragments workflow.

  There is in each fragment components entry created by dragging different fields of the same instance of VO.

  The user cannot access the next step if the current step is not correctly filled.

  In the fragment of 1st, the user chooses its type (customer, supplier,...) and in the following steps, the fields are has shown/Asterisk based on her user'type selected (I save the String bean var type managed pageFlowScope dedicated to the btf).

  Because of this in the original Version, by the way the key, there is no other area marked as mandatory.

  To manage the visibility of fields I set the property of rendering the fields (or their container) using EL expressions that read the type in the managed bean stream.

  To manage the fields points, I thought only 2 solutions:

  1)

  For each field to create a validator that checks if the fied was flled and function in the formato (e.g. for emails) right in the successful flowScope bean. So I'll have so many validator functions as areas to manage.

  
  

  2)
  

  Create a unique global validator to which the property of the validator for all fields will point in the managed bean flowScope.

  For example

  public void myGlobalBtfValidator(FacesContext facesContext, UIComponent uiComponent, Object object) {
    if (uIComponet.getId() == "InputTextEmail") {  // Component is in Fragment_1
      // Check if the filed is filled and its format
    }
    if (uiComponet.getId() == "InputTextMobileNumber") {  // Component is in Fragment_2
      // Check if the filed is filled and its format
    }
    if (uiComponet.getId() == "InputTextAddress) {  // Component is in Fragment_3
      // Check if the filed is filled
    }
  // ...
  }
  

  ID' would like to know if the 2nd solution might work and that is the approach recommended among them.

  Then, I would like to know if I can use ther uiComponent parm to the validator without any problem. I ask this question because in many threads, I saw only the parm object used. What are the different function/purpose of these 2 settings?

  Thank you

  Federico

  If you do not want to re-use these validators elsewhere in your application, then method unique validator will be enough.

  Of course, if the implementation of this method only validator will require a huge amount of code, it is probably better to split this option to separate validator methods (to simplify the maintenance).

  BTW, ID of component has to be short, so instead of using the id of the component, set f: attribute on each component of the user interface and to use uIComponet.getAttributes () .get ("attrib_name")

  Dario

• Is there a way or a widget in Muse, allowing the objects and images to react with each other?

  Hello. I would make both objects or images imported into Muse react with each other. When I say react, think of a ball bouncing off a wall or a pool ball hitting a bunch of other billiard balls. I searched for a widget that might allow cela and couldn't find one. Is this something that can do Muse, or should I look for something else... edge or the interaction of coding? Thank you.

  You can do using the edge, then publish it in the "animated dashboard deployment package", ".oam".

• How to click to view the object and click to hide the object

  I'm very new to Flash and I create an ad that has a simple animation that cycles between two pieces of content. I including, but I have a button on the lower part called 'Important information' and clicking on, I want to bring up a screen that displays important information. I want there to be a 'Close' button on the important information screen, which brings back you to the animation. What is the best way to do it? I have trouble finding a tutorial, but for me, it doesn't seem like a rare action.

  With the help of professional Flash Action Script 3.0 and CC 2015

  There are several ways to do it, but all require that your screen is an object.  a clip that you create in the IDE would be typical.

  Add the movieclip on the stage where you want it to appear and assign it an instance name, for example info_mc.

  during your use of actionscript Panel:

  removeChild (info_mc);  to remove the display info_mc and the addChild (info_mc) to get it back on top of everything else.

  for a button trigger info_mc reappear:

  btn.addEventListener (MouseEvent.CLICK, infoF);

  function infoF(e:MouseEvent):void {}

  addChild (info_mc);

  }

  the code for the close button will also call a listener function that executes removeChild (info_mc)