Record on block DB

Similar Questions

• Adding records int BLOCK in a loop

  Hi all
  
  I have problems in the following ways:
  
  When I press a button, I request a cursor that returns several records, according to certain values on this record that I have to add, or not a block.
  
  Somoeone please tell me how to do, I do:
  
  GO_BLOCK ('BLOCK');
  FOR reg cursor
  LOOP
  ..
  ..
  If s = reg.value"then
  create_record;
  : BLOCK. VALUE = S ';
  end if;
  ..
  ..
  END OF LOOP
  close the cursor;
  Exception
  while others
  close the cursor;
  
  
  THX in advance!

  The problem that I feel is the FRM-40102.

  The "FRM 40102 Records must be inserted or deleted everything first" error implies that you already have a line/record of "New" in your form so that when you call the CREATE_RECORD integrated forms you said that you have not met the minimum values required for the current 'new' recording you can not create a new.

  Frm40735 suggests (good choice of name, incidentally), rather than using the Create_Record, I would recommend that you check if the line the cursor is a new record before attempting to create a new record. Your code should look like this:

  GO_BLOCK('BLOCK');
    FOR reg in cursor
      LOOP
      ..
      ..
      if reg.value = 'S' then
        If (:system.record_status != 'NEW') THEN
          create_record;
        END IF;
      :BLOCK.VALUE = 'S';
      end if;
      ..
      ..
    END LOOP
    close cursor;
  Exception
    when others
      close cursor;
  

  Hope this helps,
  Craig B-)

  If someone useful or appropriate, please mark accordingly.

• How to record data block details without validation data?

  Hi all.
  I have a form - forms 6i - contains three blocks of data DB1 h1 ^(form/master) ^ <-DB2 ^ (in the form of table/main/detail) ^ <-DB3 ^(tabular/detail) ^
  
  There are certain mandatory elements in DB1, which must be entered.
  user first enter data DB1 then go to DB2 - master DB1, DB2 in detail.
  in normal when insert us a new record in the detail data block and move the cursor to the next element form will ask for validation. I solve this problem by engaging if the status in new or modified data block, that is the problem because there are certain elements is required in DB1, so if the user leave them empty and fill the tabular data block DB3 form will commit and the requested item will be stored as null in the database.
  
  so, how can I save the data in DB2 and DB3 temporally to the form so that the form won't ask for validation when the cursor will move to the other element?
  If Yes, then I can do a procedure which ensure that all the necessary filed came before committing.
  Thank you

  To be very honest, I'm still confused what you want to do. But the thing in the last post asked you then read on the POST in the help of forms...

  Integrated POST

  Writes data into the form in the database, but does not perform data validation. Oracle Forms valid first form. If there are changes to publish on the database, for each block in the form of what oracle Forms written deletions, insertions and updates the database. All the data that you send to the database is committed to the database of the next COMMIT_FORM that runs when the session Runform. In addition, these data can be restored by the next CLEAR_FORM.

  -Clément

• How to find the sum of an element of the record multi block?

  Hello
  
  Hi I have form have a multi block record and sing record block. Multi block record for an element, namely Excise_value. I want to find the sum of total Excise_Value of the entire tape. How to get there.
  
  Please guide me in this regard.
  
  PS: I want to use the Formula property / summary forms
  
  Thank you
  
  Iqbal

  For your unique record block, set the property of simple recording/precalculate summaries on YES.
  And in BlockA, set the property of all the query to YES.

  -Clément

• How to make a loop that records data block without having to navigate to it

  I have a form with 2 tabs. Tab_1 displays the information of the monitor and tab_2 raw_data (that the user attempts to insert/update or delete) for the monitor. The two tabs have a button 'Post production', which messages the raw_data (in tab_2) to the database. If it is an update operation, I have to check if a column_value_1 has changed from what is present in the comic book. If so, then the user should be given a warning. The warning would be appropriate if the column_value_1 for any 1 record is changed. Therefore, the comparison can be stopped after first difference. The code in the when_button_pressed trigger looks like
  
  go_block (raw_data());
  first record;
  loop
  If value_changed then
  v_alert: = true;
  "exit";
  end if;
  IF: SYSTEM. LAST_RECORD = "TRUE" THEN
  EXIT;
  ON THE OTHER
  NEXT_RECORD;
  END IF;
  end loop;
  
  If v_alert then
  display_alert;
  end if;
  
  This should work fine if I'm in tab_2 (which displays the block of raw_data). But if I hit the 'Post production' button tab_1, go_block (raw_data()) would go to tab_2, I do not want to make. So, how can I browse the raw_Data in tab_2 block without having to navigate to this tab?

  Prosper,

  I don't have what it is possible to loop in a block without having to navigate to it. Instead, you can navigate to the control you are calling by GO_ITEM integrated.

  Kind regards

  Manu.

• Record event blocks LabVIEW if the event Type is not selected.

  Hi I think that found a possible bug in LV2011 SP1.

  -Thread a property node of event Reg on the dynamic event record Terminal of a structure of event

  -Add a case to the event

  -Click on the dynamic event

  -LV accidents

  The source code included, try adding the unspecified event and look like LV breaks down.

  BR,

  / Roger

  Hi Roger,

  I doubt it. If you first select the event in the node property and then add the event to the event, you do not get an accident (I don't have at least let me know if you do). However, if boring and annoying is when it happens, there is a simple solution to the problem, which probably means that it will not be fixed on the previous version.

  Johan BR

• Play the recorded movies blocked after the computer repair

  I taped a lot of television films of storage on hard disk using Media Center. I also played to them using Media Center. My computer failed and the graphics card was replaced, following Media Center will no longer play the recorded movies, citing copyright issues. He, too, let me record new ones. What can we do?

  jmvranish@Hotmail,com

  Looks like it has something to do with Macrovision? What is a Nvidia card?

• Movie Maker won't save, reached 1% recorded and blocks indefinitely.

  Tried on two machines. Project includes a 26 MB WMV 3minute14second (recorded a series of slides under WMV PPT in PowerPoint) and 3 MB MP3 audio file that I need to save as a single film. Tried to save as H.264 and WMV with the same results... a pop dialog box where it says "Step 1 of 1", reached 1% and will sit down again there indefinitely. Complete deadlock, it is a screenshot of how it appears: http://i.imgur.com/k0rby.jpg

  Movie Maker version 2012 (Build 16.4.3503.0728)
  Windows 7 Pro 64-bit SP1

  Hello

  Movie Maker is not included in the Windows 7 operating system.

  Reference:

  Movie Maker:

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/products/features/Movie-Maker

  If you use Windows Live Movie Maker, I suggest you send the same Windows Live Forums from the link below:

  http://answers.Microsoft.com/en-us/windowslive/Forum

  Otherwise provide us with more information on the issue sets to help you to fix as soon as possible.

• Equium A100-147: Sonic recorder blocked under Vista

  I am told that sonic recorder is blocked due to a driver issue.
  There is no way to cure this other than the upgrade I don't want to do.
  The thing is I got rid of the sound recorder help adding / deleting thing, but I still get the message of blocked driver. I've got rid of everything to do with
  Sonic, including in the registry.

  There are still two programs in the list adding / deleting, but I can't just get rid of them. One of the programs is called "sonic coders" and I said I need a disc.
  I never had a drive and he took a left when I
  went from xp to vista. The other program is called "sonic DLA" and will simply not respond after I click on uninstall.
  Although he does not seem to have any obvious effect on the performance of the pc, it's a real pain having the message there all the time.
  Anyone got any ideas what to do?

  Thanks in advance.

  Hello

  As a first step, it will be interesting to know what model of laptop you have exactly and is this laptop comes with Windows XP Home or Vista edition. And secondly, can you please tell us more about your information source? Where you got information on the Sonic Software? ;)

• multi record selection in shape has 3 tubular blocks

  Good times for all

  I have a form that has 3 tubular blocks

  I need to highlight for the 3 files that are now involved in 3 blocks

  I write this code in two triggers but not work

  Triggers is

  when_validate_record

  post_query

  Start

  IF

  : SYSTEM. RECORD_STATUS = 'true', then

  Set_Item_Instance_Property('GRADE_NAMES.) USER_GRADE_ID', current_record, VISUAL_ATTRIBUTE, 'VISUAL_CURR');

  Set_Item_Instance_Property('GRADE_NAMES.) PROGRAM_NAME_AR', current_record, VISUAL_ATTRIBUTE, 'VISUAL_CURR');

  -OTHER

  -Set_Item_Instance_Property('<BLOCK_NAME.field_n ame>,current_record,VISUAL_ATTRIBUTE,'TEXT');

  END IF;

  end;

  Applications

  Ibrahim

  Hello

  You don't need to write the code

  Just do the following

  1. create the Visual attribute with desire color

  2 assign this Visual attribute on the property of current Visual attribute Record Group block (all three block)

  Please check the question answer correct/good, if this has answered your question. Thank you

• How to insulate the record insertion on a block of other blocks

  Hi all

  I am facing a problem in inserting record on several blocks. Let suppose that there are three blocks A, B and C user is inserting record in the block in the user Meanwhile jumped to block B and inserting record start here and then commit those changes. Inserting record on block B is failed due to validation on block A, where user left between the two and jumped to block B and application form for incomplete registrations. However, on the block B, all elements are validated but still ask to enter data block has.

  It is possible that if the user enter the record in the current block and forms insert record in that block and validate any changes on other blocks. I tried insert_record; integrated into the insert record but did not work. An idea to get out of this situation that I would be grateful.

  Thank you.

  A form module is treated as a single unit of work or of a single transaction. Either you save all data in it or anything. If you have a logic which must be stored separately from each other, so you should design your modules accordingly, in your case, create different form-Modules for different blocks. Everything else will only cause problems and is not the way to form of work.

  Message geändert durch AndreasWeiden

• activation and deactivation of the button in the block record multi

  Hi all
  I use
  Forms [32 bit] Version 6.0.8.24.1 (Production)
  Oracle Database 10g Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
  I have a multi record block each block contains a button (the button is to approve the record in terms of change of status)
  I have elements such as the date, remarks and button
  the button should be enabled if the remarks is not null in the case otherwise it should be disabled.
  I wrote to this effect in the pre-record trigger

  if :record is null then
     set_item_property('button',enabled,property_false);
  else
        set_item_property('button',enabled,property_false);
  end if;

  What problem is enable and disable has repercussions on all the buttons in the block. in other words, if the remarks of the first record is null then all records button is disabled. If the observations of the first record column is not null, then all the records in the column of buttons is enabled.
  I have to enable and disable the button for the corresponding record.that ways if the remarks of the first record column is not null not so only records first button should be activated and others should be disabled.
  
  Thank you...

  Hello

  but I'm not able to do.

  You can find the current record Y_POS 
  

  This means that whatever the user record navigates according to whether the button position gets her past set.but not.
  for example the user navigates up to the fourth record that will settle the position of the button but if user navigates back to the first record. the position of the button is going to the fifth record?

  V_ITEM_Y_POS: = GET_ITEM_PROPERTY ("NOM_ELEMENT", Y_POS);

  Please note that do not use the button element to get the Y_POS.
  This should be another element in the block, then button as a buttons position will continue to change on
  What you are to get the Y_POS of button which is the fourth position of the record for the first time so, it is fair,
  second time you set Y_POS button which is 4th record + first recording which is the fifth album,.
  you need to find is the Y_POS from a fixed point in the block.

  in your description what do you mean by top_record. Why I ask, is because it is multi record block(showing_10_records).so will appear every 10. no record may be hiding.

  Top of page record is the first record in the block.
  For example, in a record 10 block, if there are 20 records then if you navigate the records, if you go to the 11th, 12th, 13th, 14th... the other then your TOP_RECORD be record No 2, 3, 4,... is the first record that is displayed in the block that is not always 1, and will be 1 only for the first 10 rcords.
  If we use: system.cursor_record we will not be able to get the Y_POS exact numbers of superior record then 10 which will put the button located under the last (10th) record, which is not what we want, so need to find the TOP_RECORD.

  Best regards

  Arif Khadas

• Filtering the detail block before saving records

  I have my form
  Head_Blk
  Det_Blk
  
  I get in my Det_Blk from Table1, via a query defined in WHEN TIMER EXPIRE at the form level
  GO_BLOCK ('det_blk');
  CLEAR_BLOCK;
  FOR idx IN C_QUOT LOOP
  IF: SYSTEM. RECORD_STATUS! = 'NEW' THEN
  CREATE_RECORD;
  END IF;
  : D_PROD_CODE: = IDX.prod_CODE;
  : D_PROD_NAME: = IDX. PROD_name;
  : D_QTY: = IDX. QUOTD_qty;
  : D_RATE: = idx.quotd_rate;
  num_total_rows: = C_QUOT % ROWCOUNT;
  END LOOP;
  PREMIER_ENREGISTREMENT;
  
  The det_blk is filled with records, now user will enter into quantity in some records, NOT necessary all records.
  
  How can I finally register records of block detail, just whose quantity is greater than 0.
  
  Please advice me... TYVM

  Try this in the VALIDATION KEY:

  GO_BLOCK('det_blk');
  FIRST_RECORD;
  WHILE (:system.record_status != 'NEW' ) LOOP
     IF :det_blk.D_QTY = 0 THEN
       CLEAR_RECORD;
     END IF;
     NEXT_RECORD;
  END LOOP;
  COMMIT_FORM;
  

• Insert Record Server causing DWCC2015 down behaviors?

  Since the upgrade to DWCC2015 I have real problems with the server behaviors panel in that whenever I try to create a behavior to insert a record, it blocks DW.

  I had to install the Panel "Disapproved the server behaviors" to get my database, links and server panels behaviors back, but I assumed that the feature in their midst would continue to operate.

  Would be recognizing all of the advice offered because it is totally flat all my websites database!

  Thank you.

  NJ

  Obsolete means ' is no longer supported. You use them at your own risk.

  If you really need to use server behaviors, you must install Dreamweaver CS6, which is included in your subscription to creative cloud. CS6 can coexist with the latest version of the CC on the same computer. However, you cannot run both programs at the same time (at least on Windows).

• Block size and cannot run the snapshot-

  Hello

  I have the following LUNS carved to my windows 2008 r2 SQL box.

  ESX 4.0

  Lun1 - size - 230GB of OS 1 MB size block

  LUN2 - DataUn 4 MB block size - 950 GB

  LUN2 - size - 500 GB of block DataB 4 MB

  LUn3 - records the block size of 1 MB - 200 GB

  When I try to run a backup, veeam, got the following error

  < Unspecified file name > file is larger than the maximum size supported by the data store ' < indeterminate datastore >

  What could be the cause and how to fix it so I can run a backup on this virtual machine. How big a LUN should I create?

  Joe.

  Check this KB, would be useful

  http://KB.VMware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalID=1012384

  -A